26 September 2026

Minister of State for Defence Desmond Choo Visits SAF’s Artillery Live-Firing Exercise in the United States

26 September 2026

Exercise Daring Warrior in Fort Sill, Oklahoma, United States (photos: Sing Mindef)

Minister of State (MOS) for Defence Desmond Choo visited Exercise Daring Warrior in Fort Sill, Oklahoma, United States (US) yesterday (Singapore time) to witness the Singapore Armed Forces’ (SAF) and the US Army’s combined live-firing exercise.


Held from 29 August to 28 September 2026, the exercise involved about 110 SAF and 50 US Army personnel, as well as the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) operated by the Singapore Army’s 23rd Battalion, Singapore Artillery, and the Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) operated by the US Army’s 75th Field Artillery Brigade.


During his visit, MOS Choo received a brief on the conduct of the exercise and witnessed the precision strike capabilities of the HIMARS and MLRS. He also engaged the exercise participants and thanked them for their dedication and commitment to defence. Speaking after his visit, MOS Choo expressed confidence in the SAF’s operational capabilities and highlighted the importance of overseas training opportunities for the SAF.
 

He said, “Exercise Daring Warrior is an extremely important exercise for the SAF. It allows us to train in realistic conditions beyond land-constrained Singapore, and allows our servicemen and servicewomen to be able to improve their professional skills by training with our US counterparts. NS60 is coming next year, and it is important for us to recognise and appreciate the work of our national servicemen and their contributions to building up competencies that have allowed us to be an effective fighting force.”


First held in 2010, this 11th edition of Exercise Daring Warrior underscores the long-standing and mutually beneficial defence relations between Singapore and the US. The SAF’s training in the US provides opportunities for professional exchanges that have strengthened cooperation and deepened understanding between personnel from both armed forces. The vast training space in the US also allows the SAF to conduct realistic training to sharpen its operational competencies and enhance operational readiness.

30 komentar:

  1. AAV M35 BARUW hah!✌️๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘Œ

    BalasHapus
  2. AAV M35 BARUW hah!✌️๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘Œ

    Kamo Baruw jugak..SOKLAT haha!๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ˜‰⚡️

    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1538891774660673/?referral_source=external_deeplink&original_uri=https://www.facebook.com/share/r/19XxAGGGjR/

    BalasHapus
  3. INDONESIA=
    KAPAL INDUK✔️
    AMRAAM✔️
    METEOR✔️
    HAMMER✔️
    FREGAT✔️
    SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
    48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
    42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
    16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
    33 F16✔️
    12 M346FA✔️
    20 T50i✔️
    24 HAWK✔️
    4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
    2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
    2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
    4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
    --------------------------------
    1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
    2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
    3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
    4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
    5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
    6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
    7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
    8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
    9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
    ===============
    ===============
    MALONYET
    18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
    18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
    7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
    16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
    NSM BANNED❌
    AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
    F18 BATAL❌
    UH60A BATAL❌
    REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
    SIPRI KOSONG❌
    --------------------------------
    FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
    LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
    MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
    DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
    -
    FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
    BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
    AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
    ---------------------------------
    2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
    2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
    2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
    1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
    1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    --------------------------------
    1967: USCG DECISIVE
    1968: USCGC STEADFAST
    1980: KM PERWIRA
    1984: LERICI CLASS
    1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
    1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
    1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    1. Singapura ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ: 347%
    2. Malondesh ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ: 224%
    3. Thailand ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ: 223%
    4. Vietnam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ: 161%
    5. Laos ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~5 - 10%
    -
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    1. Singapura ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ: 176,3%
    2. Laos ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malondesh ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ: 70,5%
    4. Thailand ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ: 63,0%
    6. Filipina ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~2,3%
    -
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)

    BalasHapus
  4. Minister of State for Defence Desmond Choo Visits SAF’s Artillery Live-Firing Exercise in the United States
    ------------

    waduuu himars seblah nembak roket jauh2 banget ke Amrik...haha!๐Ÿคญ๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜‰

    padahal arah johor ada area forest city..sepi bole coba haha!๐Ÿš€☠️๐Ÿคญ

    BalasHapus
  5. INDONESIA=
    KAPAL INDUK✔️
    AMRAAM✔️
    METEOR✔️
    HAMMER✔️
    FREGAT✔️
    SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
    48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
    42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
    16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
    33 F16✔️
    12 M346FA✔️
    20 T50i✔️
    24 HAWK✔️
    4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
    2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
    2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
    4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
    --------------------------------
    1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
    2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
    3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
    4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
    5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
    6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
    7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
    8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
    9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
    ===============
    ===============
    MALONYET
    18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
    18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
    7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
    16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
    NSM BANNED❌
    AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
    F18 BATAL❌
    UH60A BATAL❌
    REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
    SIPRI KOSONG❌
    --------------------------------
    FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
    LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
    MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
    DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
    -
    FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
    BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
    AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
    ---------------------------------
    2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
    2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
    2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
    1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
    1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    --------------------------------
    1967: USCG DECISIVE
    1968: USCGC STEADFAST
    1980: KM PERWIRA
    1984: LERICI CLASS
    1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
    1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
    1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    1. Singapura ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ: 347%
    2. Malondesh ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ: 224%
    3. Thailand ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ: 223%
    4. Vietnam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ: 161%
    5. Laos ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~5 - 10%
    -
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    1. Singapura ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ: 176,3%
    2. Laos ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malondesh ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ: 70,5%
    4. Thailand ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ: 63,0%
    6. Filipina ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~2,3%
    -
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)

    BalasHapus
  6. INDONESIA=
    KAPAL INDUK✔️
    AMRAAM✔️
    METEOR✔️
    HAMMER✔️
    FREGAT✔️
    SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
    48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
    42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
    16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
    33 F16✔️
    12 M346FA✔️
    20 T50i✔️
    24 HAWK✔️
    4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
    2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
    2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
    4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
    --------------------------------
    1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
    2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
    3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
    4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
    5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
    6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
    7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
    8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
    9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
    ===============
    ===============
    MALONYET
    18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
    18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
    7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
    16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
    NSM BANNED❌
    AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
    F18 BATAL❌
    UH60A BATAL❌
    REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
    SIPRI KOSONG❌
    --------------------------------
    FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
    LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
    MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
    DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
    -
    FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
    BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
    AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
    ---------------------------------
    2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
    2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
    2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
    1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
    1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    --------------------------------
    1967: USCG DECISIVE
    1968: USCGC STEADFAST
    1980: KM PERWIRA
    1984: LERICI CLASS
    1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
    1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
    1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
    --------------------------------
    UTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH (1998–2026)
    1998: RM 103,1 Miliar – Dampak Krisis Keuangan Asia.
    1999: RM 116,6 Miliar – Penerbitan obligasi domestik baru.
    2000: RM 125,6 Miliar – Restrukturisasi korporasi & perbankan selesai.
    2001: RM 145,7 Miliar – Lonjakan belanja pembangunan domestik.
    2002: RM 165,0 Miliar – Rasio utang terhadap PDB naik.
    2003: RM 188,8 Miliar – Plafon utang naik ke 40% PDB.
    2004: RM 216,6 Miliar – Ekspansi proyek infrastruktur baru.
    2005: RM 228,7 Miliar – Konsolidasi fiskal manajemen baru.
    2006: RM 242,2 Miliar – Pengendalian defisit anggaran ketat.
    2007: RM 266,7 Miliar – Posisi keuangan stabil pra-krisis global.
    2008: RM 306,4 Miliar – Plafon utang naik ke 45% PDB.
    2009: RM 362,4 Miliar – Plafon utang melonjak ke 55% PDB.
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar – Pertumbuhan awal pasca-krisis global.
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar – Tren kenaikan utang stabil.
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar – Menembus ambang batas RM 500 miliar.
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar – Ekspansi besar infrastruktur nasional.
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar – Berdasarkan Laporan Pemerintah Federal.
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar – Dampak fluktuasi harga minyak.
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar – Konsolidasi fiskal pemerintah berjalan.
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar – Tercatat dalam Laporan Bank Negara.
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun – Transparansi liabilitas 1MDB & proyek PPP.
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun – Total pengungkapan resmi utang.
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun – Dampak stimulus pandemi COVID-19.
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun – Akumulasi masa pemulihan ekonomi.
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun – Posisi akhir sebelum pergantian pemerintah.
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun – Konfirmasi PM Anwar Ibrahim atas warisan utang.
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun – Berdasarkan data APBN 2024.
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun – Proyeksi Tinjauan Fiskal Kementerian Kewangan.
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun – Target manajemen utang Economic Outlook.


    BalasHapus
  7. INDONESIA=
    KAPAL INDUK✔️
    AMRAAM✔️
    METEOR✔️
    HAMMER✔️
    FREGAT✔️
    SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
    48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
    42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
    16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
    33 F16✔️
    12 M346FA✔️
    20 T50i✔️
    24 HAWK✔️
    4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
    2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
    2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
    4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
    --------------------------------
    1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
    2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
    3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
    4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
    5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
    6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
    7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
    8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
    9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
    ===============
    ===============
    MALONYET
    18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
    18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
    7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
    16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
    NSM BANNED❌
    AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
    F18 BATAL❌
    UH60A BATAL❌
    REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
    SIPRI KOSONG❌
    --------------------------------
    FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
    LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
    MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
    DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
    -
    FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
    BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
    AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
    ---------------------------------
    2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
    2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
    2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
    1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
    1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    --------------------------------
    1967: USCG DECISIVE
    1968: USCGC STEADFAST
    1980: KM PERWIRA
    1984: LERICI CLASS
    1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
    1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
    1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
    --------------------------------
    ๐Ÿงฑ 1. Weak Implementation of Integrated Logistics Support (ILS)
    ILS is a structured approach used globally to ensure military assets are supported throughout their lifecycle. In MALONYET :
    • The ILS framework is not consistently applied across all branches of the Armed Forces.
    • Logistics Support Analysis (LSA), which helps forecast maintenance and supply needs, is underutilized or poorly executed, especially for armored vehicles.
    • This leads to inefficient sustainment, meaning equipment can't be reliably maintained or deployed when needed.
    ๐Ÿ”„ 2. Fragmented Logistics Planning Across Services
    • The Army, Navy, and Air Force each operate their own logistics systems with limited integration, causing duplication and delays.
    • There’s a lack of centralized coordination, which means supplies, spare parts, and maintenance schedules are often mismatched or delayed.
    • During joint operations or disaster response, this fragmentation slows down deployment and resupply efforts.

    BalasHapus
  8. INDONESIA=
    KAPAL INDUK✔️
    AMRAAM✔️
    METEOR✔️
    HAMMER✔️
    FREGAT✔️
    SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
    48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
    42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
    16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
    33 F16✔️
    12 M346FA✔️
    20 T50i✔️
    24 HAWK✔️
    4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
    2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
    2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
    4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
    --------------------------------
    1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
    2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
    3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
    4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
    5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
    6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
    7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
    8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
    9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
    ===============
    ===============
    MALONYET
    18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
    18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
    7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
    16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
    NSM BANNED❌
    AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
    F18 BATAL❌
    UH60A BATAL❌
    REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
    SIPRI KOSONG❌
    --------------------------------
    FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
    LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
    MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
    DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
    -
    FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
    BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
    AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
    ---------------------------------
    2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
    2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
    2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
    1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
    1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    --------------------------------
    1967: USCG DECISIVE
    1968: USCGC STEADFAST
    1980: KM PERWIRA
    1984: LERICI CLASS
    1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
    1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
    1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
    --------------------------------
    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1. What is the “Chronic Allocation Problem”?
    MALONYET defense budget suffers from structural imbalances:
    • ~70% → Salaries, pensions, allowances.
    • ~20–25% → Operations & maintenance (O&M).
    • <10% → Development (procurement, modernization).
    This pattern has persisted for decades, regardless of who is in power. It’s “chronic” because it doesn’t change year to year — it is baked into MALONYET defense system.
    ________________________________________
    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2. Why So Skewed?
    1. Large manpower-heavy force → Army dominates with many personnel, each entitled to allowances & pensions.
    2. Political incentives → Governments prefer to expand or protect jobs and welfare (pensions, veterans’ benefits) rather than invest in long-term modernization.
    3. Rigid financial system → Once salaries & pensions are committed, they are “locked in,” leaving procurement squeezed.
    4. Weak multi-year planning → Budgets are annual, so each year O&M & salaries get priority over new projects.
    ________________________________________
    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3. Effects on the Armed Forces
    ✈️ Air Force (RMAF)
    • Insufficient flying hours → pilots often below NATO standards.
    • Can’t afford to maintain multiple fleets (Su-30, F/A-18D, Hawks).
    • Retirement of MiG-29 left gap, but MRCA replacement delayed decades due to budget.
    ________________________________________
    ๐Ÿšข Navy (RMN)
    • Modernization projects (e.g., LCS frigates) stalled because there’s no steady development funding.
    • Existing fleet spends fewer days at sea due to limited fuel allocations.
    • Submarines (Scorpรจne) struggle with high operational costs.
    ________________________________________
    ๐Ÿช– Army (TDM)
    • Personnel-heavy structure consumes most of the salary budget.
    • Modernization of armored vehicles, artillery, and air defense delayed.
    • Training often limited to small-scale jungle exercises (cheap but outdated for modern warfare).

    BalasHapus
  9. Sangka berita F15 VERSI PRANK INDIANESIA.... ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      ๐Ÿ“Œ 1. What is the “Chronic Allocation Problem”?
      MALONYET defense budget suffers from structural imbalances:
      • ~70% → Salaries, pensions, allowances.
      • ~20–25% → Operations & maintenance (O&M).
      • <10% → Development (procurement, modernization).
      This pattern has persisted for decades, regardless of who is in power. It’s “chronic” because it doesn’t change year to year — it is baked into MALONYET defense system.
      ________________________________________
      ๐Ÿ“Œ 2. Why So Skewed?
      1. Large manpower-heavy force → Army dominates with many personnel, each entitled to allowances & pensions.
      2. Political incentives → Governments prefer to expand or protect jobs and welfare (pensions, veterans’ benefits) rather than invest in long-term modernization.
      3. Rigid financial system → Once salaries & pensions are committed, they are “locked in,” leaving procurement squeezed.
      4. Weak multi-year planning → Budgets are annual, so each year O&M & salaries get priority over new projects.
      ________________________________________
      ๐Ÿ“Œ 3. Effects on the Armed Forces
      ✈️ Air Force (RMAF)
      • Insufficient flying hours → pilots often below NATO standards.
      • Can’t afford to maintain multiple fleets (Su-30, F/A-18D, Hawks).
      • Retirement of MiG-29 left gap, but MRCA replacement delayed decades due to budget.
      ________________________________________
      ๐Ÿšข Navy (RMN)
      • Modernization projects (e.g., LCS frigates) stalled because there’s no steady development funding.
      • Existing fleet spends fewer days at sea due to limited fuel allocations.
      • Submarines (Scorpรจne) struggle with high operational costs.
      ________________________________________
      ๐Ÿช– Army (TDM)
      • Personnel-heavy structure consumes most of the salary budget.
      • Modernization of armored vehicles, artillery, and air defense delayed.
      • Training often limited to small-scale jungle exercises (cheap but outdated for modern warfare).

      Hapus
    2. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      KLAIM CASH = HUTANG ASET MILITER
      -
      1. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turki (LMS Batch 2)
      Model: G2G (Antar Pemerintah) via SSB.
      Bunga: 4% – 6% (Fixed/OECD CIRR).
      Tenor: 10 – 15 Tahun.
      -
      2. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Korea Selatan (Pesawat FA-50)
      Model: Hybrid (Kredit KEXIM & Barter CPO 50%).
      Biaya: Management Fee sangat rendah (0,10% - 0,50%).
      -
      3. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Inggris (Standar UKEF - Pesawat Hawk)
      Syarat: Wajib DP 15% (Standar OECD).
      Bunga: Stabil, mengikuti National Loans Fund.
      -
      4. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China (LMS Batch 1)
      Model: 100% Kredit Ekspor (China Eximbank).
      Bunga: Sangat murah (3,5% Fixed).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun.
      -
      5. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Polandia (Tank PT-91M)
      Model: DP 15% + Barter CPO (30-40%).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun cicilan.
      -
      6. ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Jerman (Kedah-Class)
      Model: Kredit Komersial dijamin negara (Euler Hermes).
      Pendana: Deutsche Bank & Konsorsium.
      -
      7. Kredit Sindikasi (Proyek LCS - 17 Kreditor/Hutang)
      Model: Konsorsium Bank Domestik/Intl (Skala Masif).
      Bunga: 6% (Saldo Menurun).
      Tenor: 15 Tahun (Akibat penundaan proyek)..

      Hapus
    3. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      KLAIM CASH = HUTANG ASET MILITER
      -
      1. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turki (LMS Batch 2)
      Model: G2G (Antar Pemerintah) via SSB.
      Bunga: 4% – 6% (Fixed/OECD CIRR).
      Tenor: 10 – 15 Tahun.
      -
      2. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท Korea Selatan (Pesawat FA-50)
      Model: Hybrid (Kredit KEXIM & Barter CPO 50%).
      Biaya: Management Fee sangat rendah (0,10% - 0,50%).
      -
      3. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Inggris (Standar UKEF - Pesawat Hawk)
      Syarat: Wajib DP 15% (Standar OECD).
      Bunga: Stabil, mengikuti National Loans Fund.
      -
      4. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China (LMS Batch 1)
      Model: 100% Kredit Ekspor (China Eximbank).
      Bunga: Sangat murah (3,5% Fixed).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun.
      -
      5. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Polandia (Tank PT-91M)
      Model: DP 15% + Barter CPO (30-40%).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun cicilan.
      -
      6. ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Jerman (Kedah-Class)
      Model: Kredit Komersial dijamin negara (Euler Hermes).
      Pendana: Deutsche Bank & Konsorsium.
      -
      7. Kredit Sindikasi (Proyek LCS - 17 Kreditor/Hutang)
      Model: Konsorsium Bank Domestik/Intl (Skala Masif).
      Bunga: 6% (Saldo Menurun).
      Tenor: 15 Tahun (Akibat penundaan proyek)..

      Hapus
    4. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      1. Singapura ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ: 347%
      2. Malondesh ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ: 224%
      3. Thailand ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ: 223%
      4. Vietnam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ: 161%
      5. Laos ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~5 - 10%
      -
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      1. Singapura ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ: 176,3%
      2. Laos ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ฆ: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malondesh ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ: 70,5%
      4. Thailand ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ: 63,0%
      6. Filipina ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ญ: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ฑ: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ณ: ~2,3%
      -
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)

      Hapus
    5. KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x KING : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x PM : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 6x MINDEF : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      -
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      --------------------------------
      1️⃣ MALONSIA DEBT DATA 2026
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion
      -
      Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Total Population of Malonsia (2026): 36,385,115 citizens
      --------------------------------
      2️⃣ PER CAPITA DEBT CALCULATION FOR MALONSIA (2026)
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
      -
      ➡ Total Cumulative Debt Burden Per Capita: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
      --------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      MALONSIA's approach to financing large-scale defense acquisitions often involves the use of loan agreements :
      1. The Need for Loan Agreements
      • High Cost of Modern Defense Systems: Modern military equipment, such as fighter jets, naval vessels, submarines, air defense systems, and advanced armored vehicles, are extremely expensive. A single major acquisition can easily exceed MALONSIA's annual defense budget.
      • Budgetary Constraints: While MALONSIA allocates a significant portion of its budget to defense, there are always competing demands from other sectors like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and social welfare. This limits the amount that can be immediately spent on defense acquisitions.
      • Long-Term Modernization Goals: MALONSIA has a continuous need to modernize its armed forces to maintain regional security, protect its sovereignty, and respond to evolving threats. Loan agreements facilitate these long-term strategic objectives by spreading the financial burden over several years.
      -----------------
      2. Sources of Loans
      MALONSIA can tap into various sources for these defense-related loans:
      • Foreign Governments (Government-to-Government Loans):
      o Direct Financing: Often, a selling country's government (e.g., France, the UK, Germany, South Korea) will offer direct government-backed loans or credit lines to MALONSIA to facilitate the purchase of their defense products. This can be part of a larger diplomatic or trade package.
      o Export Credit Agencies (ECAs): Many countries have ECAs (e.g., UK Export Finance, COFACE in France, Euler Hermes in Germany) that provide guarantees or direct loans to support their national defense industries' exports. These loans often come with favorable terms.
      o Advantages: These loans can sometimes offer lower interest rates, longer repayment periods, and more flexible terms than commercial loans, as they are often intertwined with strategic partnerships.
      • International Banks/Financial Institutions:
      o Commercial Loans: MALONSIA can secure loans from large international commercial banks or consortia of banks. These are typically market-rate loans, but for large sums, they might involve syndicated lending (multiple banks pooling resources).

      Hapus
    6. KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x KING : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x PM : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 6x MINDEF : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      -
      BERUK TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      --------------------------------
      1️⃣ MALONSIA DEBT DATA 2026
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion
      -
      Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Total Population of Malonsia (2026): 36,385,115 citizens
      --------------------------------
      2️⃣ PER CAPITA DEBT CALCULATION FOR MALONSIA (2026)
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
      -
      ➡ Total Cumulative Debt Burden Per Capita: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
      --------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Identification of Needs:
      The MALONSIAn Armed Forces (MAF) first identifies its operational requirements and strategic defense needs. This involves assessments of current threats, technological advancements, and the lifespan of existing equipment. For example, the Royal MALONSIAn Navy might identify a need for new littoral mission ships (LMS) or the Royal MALONSIAn Air Force for multi-role combat aircraft.
      -----------------
      2. Budget Allocation and Approval:
      Defense spending is a significant part of the national budget. The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) prepares budget proposals, which are then subject to approval by the MALONSIAn Parliament. For major acquisitions, special allocations or supplementary budgets may be required.
      -----------------
      3. Procurement Methods:
      MALONSIA employs various procurement methods, including:
      * Direct Negotiation: For specialized equipment or where only a few suppliers exist, direct negotiation with manufacturers or foreign governments is common.
      * International Tendering: For more competitive markets, international tenders are issued, allowing various global defense contractors to bid.
      * Government-to-Government (G2G) Agreements: Sometimes, procurement is done directly between the MALONSIAn government and a foreign government, which can facilitate financing options.
      -----------------
      4. Financing Options – How Loans Come In:
      When the outright purchase of military equipment is too costly for the immediate national budget, loans become a crucial financing mechanism. Here are the common sources and types of loans:
      Commercial Bank Loans:
      Syndicated Loans: A group of banks might come together to provide a large loan to the MALONSIAn government or a specific government entity responsible for procurement. These are often arranged through international financial institutions.
      Export Credit Agencies (ECAs): Many countries that export defense equipment have ECAs (e.g., UKEF in the UK, EXIM Bank in the US, Euler Hermes in Germany). These agencies provide loan guarantees, direct loans, or insurance to facilitate exports from their respective countries. If MALONSIA buys equipment from a French company, for instance, a French ECA might offer favorable financing terms to secure the deal for the French exporter. This is a very common source of financing for defense deals.
      Foreign Government Loans/Credits:
      Soft Loans/Concessional Loans: Sometimes, a foreign government might offer loans with very favorable terms (low interest rates, long repayment periods) as part of a broader diplomatic or strategic partnership, or to stimulate their own defense industry's exports.
      Defense Cooperation Agreements: These agreements can sometimes include provisions for financial assistance or credit lines for military purchases.
      Bonds/Sukuk:
      The MALONSIAn government could issue sovereign bonds or Islamic bonds (Sukuk) in domestic or international markets to raise funds for general expenditure, which could include military procurement. While not direct "loans" for a specific piece of equipment, they are a way to raise capital.

      Hapus
    7. KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x KING : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x PM : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 6x MINDEF : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      -
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      --------------------------------
      1️⃣ MALONSIA DEBT DATA 2026
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion
      -
      Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Total Population of Malonsia (2026): 36,385,115 citizens
      --------------------------------
      2️⃣ PER CAPITA DEBT CALCULATION FOR MALONSIA (2026)
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
      -
      ➡ Total Cumulative Debt Burden Per Capita: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
      --------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      USE OF LOANS IN DEFENSE PROCUREMENT
      1. Why Loans Are Used
      Budget Limits: MALONSIA’s annual defense budget is relatively modest (about RM15–20 billion in recent years). Buying big-ticket items like submarines, frigates, or fighter jets in one year would swallow a large chunk of the budget.
      Need for Modernization: To maintain regional balance (especially with neighbors like Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam), MALONSIA wants to modernize across all services (army, navy, air force) simultaneously.
      Smoothing Expenditure: Loans allow MALONSIA to spread payments over 5–15 years, instead of paying everything upfront.
      Political Optics: Loans make it easier for governments to announce “big” purchases without creating sudden budget spikes.
      ________________________________________
      2. Where the Loans Come From
      Foreign Export Credit Agencies (ECAs):
      Example: France’s COFACE, Germany’s Euler Hermes, South Korea’s KEXIM.
      These agencies guarantee loans tied to purchases from their industries.
      International Banks / Syndicated Loans:
      Global banks provide financing secured by sovereign guarantees.
      Domestic Financing:
      MALONSIA sometimes uses local banks or issues government bonds to support large contracts (especially if local shipyards are involved).
      ________________________________________
      3. How the Loans Are Structured
      Buyer’s Credit (Tied Loans):
      MALONSIA borrows from the supplier’s country → money must be spent on that country’s defense products.
      Supplier’s Credit:
      The vendor arranges financing on MALONSIA’s behalf.
      Mixed Financing:
      Part loan, part direct allocation from MALONSIA’s budget.
      Grace Periods:
      Often 3–5 years before repayment begins, matching the delivery of ships/planes.
      Repayment Terms:
      Usually 5–15 years, in USD or EUR, sometimes with concessional interest if linked to government-to-government deals.
      ________________________________________
      4. Examples of Loan-Financed Procurement
      Scorpene Submarines (France, early 2000s):
      Financed with loans from French banks, backed by the French government’s export credit agency. Payments stretched over many years.
      PT-91M “Pendekar” Tanks (Poland):
      Reports suggest export credit financing from Poland/Europe, since the total contract was too large for MALONSIA’s defense budget in one year.
      Littoral Combat Ship (LCS):
      Domestic + foreign financing mix. MALONSIAn banks supported Boustead Naval Shipyard with loans, while the government made progressive payments. Debt restructuring later became necessary due to delays.
      FA-50M Fighter Jets (South Korea, 2023):
      Likely tied to Korean financing packages (KEXIM export credit), though details not fully disclosed. A typical arrangement for aircraft sales from Korea.
      NGPVs (Kedah-class Patrol Vessels, 1990s–2000s):
      Built locally under a German license; financing reportedly included German export credit facilities.

      Hapus
    8. KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x KING : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x PM : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 6x MINDEF : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      -
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      --------------------------------
      1️⃣ MALONSIA DEBT DATA 2026
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion
      -
      Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Total Population of Malonsia (2026): 36,385,115 citizens
      --------------------------------
      2️⃣ PER CAPITA DEBT CALCULATION FOR MALONSIA (2026)
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
      -
      ➡ Total Cumulative Debt Burden Per Capita: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
      --------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Soft Loans (Government-to-Government or Export Credit Agencies):
      These are often provided by the exporting country's government or its export credit agency at favorable interest rates and repayment terms. They are typically used for large, strategic acquisitions.
      Example: Submarines (Scorpรจne Class from France)
      Asset: Two Perdana Menteri-class (Scorpรจne) submarines.
      Procurement: Acquired from France's DCNS (now Naval Group) and Spain's Navantia. The deal, signed in 2002, was reportedly financed through a combination of commercial loans and a government-backed credit facility from France and Spain. The total cost was around €1.08 billion (approximately RM4.7 billion at the time). The financing structure allowed MALONSIA to spread the cost over several years.
      Details: These loans are often tied to defense contracts, making it easier for developing nations to acquire sophisticated military technology. The repayment schedules are structured to be manageable for the acquiring nation's budget.
      -----------------
      2. Commercial Loans from Banks:
      For smaller acquisitions or when government-to-government loans are not available, MALONSIA might secure commercial loans from local or international banks. These loans are typically at market rates.
      Example: Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs)
      Asset: Various batches of Offshore Patrol Vessels (e.g., from local shipyards).
      Procurement: While some earlier OPVs might have been funded directly, more recent procurements or upgrades involving local shipyards could involve commercial financing. Shipyards often secure bank loans to fund construction, and the MALONSIAn government then pays in installments, which effectively means the procurement is supported by a form of commercial financing, albeit indirectly.
      Details: The government might issue guarantees for these loans, reducing the risk for commercial banks and potentially securing better terms.
      -----------------
      3. Direct Government Funding (Budget Allocation):
      While not a "loan" in the traditional sense, a significant portion of military procurement comes directly from the annual defense budget. However, even budget allocations can sometimes be backstopped by short-term government borrowing if immediate funds are insufficient.
      Example: Various smaller assets, maintenance, and upgrades.
      Asset: Armored vehicles, small arms, communication equipment, regular maintenance, and upgrades for existing platforms.
      Procurement: These are typically funded through direct allocations from the Ministry of Defence's annual budget. The funds are earmarked for specific projects or operational needs.
      Details: This method is preferred for recurring expenses or less capital-intensive acquisitions.
      -----------------
      4. Barter Trade or Counter-Trade (Less Common for Large Assets):
      While not a loan, historically some countries have used barter trade, where goods or services are exchanged for military assets. This is less common for high-value modern military assets but has been explored in the past.

      Hapus
    9. KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x KING : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x PM : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 6x MINDEF : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      -
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      --------------------------------
      1️⃣ MALONSIA DEBT DATA 2026
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion
      -
      Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Total Population of Malonsia (2026): 36,385,115 citizens
      --------------------------------
      2️⃣ PER CAPITA DEBT CALCULATION FOR MALONSIA (2026)
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
      -
      ➡ Total Cumulative Debt Burden Per Capita: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
      --------------------------------
      KLAIM MPA UAV CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      MALONSIA's defense procurement strategy has historically involved a mix of direct cash purchases, government-to-government (G2G) deals, and increasingly, the use of loans and financing schemes. The shift towards greater reliance on loans is driven by several factors, including:
      Budgetary Constraints: Like many nations, MALONSIA faces pressure to balance defense spending with other national priorities such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Loans allow the Ministry of Defense (MINDEF) to acquire high-value assets without immediately drawing large sums from the annual budget.
      Modernization Needs: The MALONSIAn Armed Forces (MAF) are undergoing a continuous modernization process to maintain regional relevance and address evolving security threats. Modern military equipment, such as fighter jets, warships, and advanced missile systems, is incredibly expensive.
      Technological Advancement: Rapid advancements in defense technology mean that new equipment often comes with a hefty price tag. Loans help bridge the gap between budgetary allocations and the cost of acquiring cutting-edge systems.
      Economic Offsets and Industrial Participation: Often, loan agreements or large procurement contracts come with clauses for economic offsets, technology transfer, or local industrial participation. These can be attractive to the MALONSIAn government as they contribute to local economic development and build domestic defense capabilities.
      Payment Flexibility: Loans offer structured payment plans over several years, which can be more manageable for national finances compared to a single, large upfront Detailed Example: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Project
      -----------------
      The procurement of six Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) for the Royal MALONSIAn Navy (RMN) serves as a prime example of a large-scale defense project heavily reliant on financing.
      Initial Contract: The contract for the six LCS vessels was awarded to Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) in 2011, with a value exceeding RM9 billion (approximately USD2.1 billion at the time). The project involves the construction of Gowind-class corvettes designed by French company Naval Group (formerly DCNS).
      Financing Structure: While specific details of the financing structure are not always publicly disclosed due to commercial sensitivities, it is understood that the project involved a significant portion of financing that was not entirely upfront cash payment. This typically includes a mix of government allocations and loans, possibly from local banks or with government guarantees, spread over the construction period.

      Hapus
    10. KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x KING : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 5x PM : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      KASIH PAHAM ....GANTI 6x MINDEF : ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
      -
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      MALONSIA TERTIPU : NOT PAID FFBNP = LEASING
      --------------------------------
      1️⃣ MALONSIA DEBT DATA 2026
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion
      -
      Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
      -
      Total Population of Malonsia (2026): 36,385,115 citizens
      --------------------------------
      2️⃣ PER CAPITA DEBT CALCULATION FOR MALONSIA (2026)
      -
      Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
      -
      Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
      -
      ➡ Total Cumulative Debt Burden Per Capita: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
      --------------------------------
      KLAIM MPA UAV CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      MALONSIA's defense procurement strategy has historically involved a mix of direct cash purchases, government-to-government (G2G) deals, and increasingly, the use of loans and financing schemes. The shift towards greater reliance on loans is driven by several factors, including:
      Budgetary Constraints: Like many nations, MALONSIA faces pressure to balance defense spending with other national priorities such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Loans allow the Ministry of Defense (MINDEF) to acquire high-value assets without immediately drawing large sums from the annual budget.
      Modernization Needs: The MALONSIAn Armed Forces (MAF) are undergoing a continuous modernization process to maintain regional relevance and address evolving security threats. Modern military equipment, such as fighter jets, warships, and advanced missile systems, is incredibly expensive.
      Technological Advancement: Rapid advancements in defense technology mean that new equipment often comes with a hefty price tag. Loans help bridge the gap between budgetary allocations and the cost of acquiring cutting-edge systems.
      Economic Offsets and Industrial Participation: Often, loan agreements or large procurement contracts come with clauses for economic offsets, technology transfer, or local industrial participation. These can be attractive to the MALONSIAn government as they contribute to local economic development and build domestic defense capabilities.
      Payment Flexibility: Loans offer structured payment plans over several years, which can be more manageable for national finances compared to a single, large upfront Detailed Example: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Project
      -----------------
      The procurement of six Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) for the Royal MALONSIAn Navy (RMN) serves as a prime example of a large-scale defense project heavily reliant on financing.
      Initial Contract: The contract for the six LCS vessels was awarded to Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) in 2011, with a value exceeding RM9 billion (approximately USD2.1 billion at the time). The project involves the construction of Gowind-class corvettes designed by French company Naval Group (formerly DCNS).
      Financing Structure: While specific details of the financing structure are not always publicly disclosed due to commercial sensitivities, it is understood that the project involved a significant portion of financing that was not entirely upfront cash payment. This typically includes a mix of government allocations and loans, possibly from local banks or with government guarantees, spread over the construction period.

      Hapus
    11. NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      UTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH (1998–2026)
      1998: RM 103,1 Miliar – Dampak Krisis Keuangan Asia.
      1999: RM 116,6 Miliar – Penerbitan obligasi domestik baru.
      2000: RM 125,6 Miliar – Restrukturisasi korporasi & perbankan selesai.
      2001: RM 145,7 Miliar – Lonjakan belanja pembangunan domestik.
      2002: RM 165,0 Miliar – Rasio utang terhadap PDB naik.
      2003: RM 188,8 Miliar – Plafon utang naik ke 40% PDB.
      2004: RM 216,6 Miliar – Ekspansi proyek infrastruktur baru.
      2005: RM 228,7 Miliar – Konsolidasi fiskal manajemen baru.
      2006: RM 242,2 Miliar – Pengendalian defisit anggaran ketat.
      2007: RM 266,7 Miliar – Posisi keuangan stabil pra-krisis global.
      2008: RM 306,4 Miliar – Plafon utang naik ke 45% PDB.
      2009: RM 362,4 Miliar – Plafon utang melonjak ke 55% PDB.
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar – Pertumbuhan awal pasca-krisis global.
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar – Tren kenaikan utang stabil.
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar – Menembus ambang batas RM 500 miliar.
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar – Ekspansi besar infrastruktur nasional.
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar – Berdasarkan Laporan Pemerintah Federal.
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar – Dampak fluktuasi harga minyak.
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar – Konsolidasi fiskal pemerintah berjalan.
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar – Tercatat dalam Laporan Bank Negara.
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun – Transparansi liabilitas 1MDB & proyek PPP.
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun – Total pengungkapan resmi utang.
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun – Dampak stimulus pandemi COVID-19.
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun – Akumulasi masa pemulihan ekonomi.
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun – Posisi akhir sebelum pergantian pemerintah.
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun – Konfirmasi PM Anwar Ibrahim atas warisan utang.
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun – Berdasarkan data APBN 2024.
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun – Proyeksi Tinjauan Fiskal Kementerian Kewangan.
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun – Target manajemen utang Economic Outlook.
      --------------------------------------------
      OBLIGASI GLOBAL (1998–2026)
      1998: Fokus restrukturisasi internal. Absen pasar global.
      1999: Rilis Global Bond USD 1 miliar (AS/Eropa). Bukti pemulihan.
      2002: Rilis Sukuk Ijarah Global pertama dunia USD 600 juta (London/Timur Tengah).
      2004: Promosi surat utang luar negeri via Khazanah Nasional.
      2006: Khazanah rilis Exchangeable Sukuk USD 750 juta (Asia/Eropa).
      2011: Rilis Wakala Global Sukuk USD 2 miliar. Permintaan oversubscribed 4,5 kali.
      2015: Rilis Sukuk Wakala Global USD 1,5 miliar untuk infrastruktur.
      2016: Rilis Sukuk Global USD 1,5 miliar (tenor 10 & 30 tahun).
      2019: Diversifikasi ke Samurai Bond JPY 200 miliar bergaransi JBIC (Jepang).
      2021: Rilis Sovereign Sustainability Sukuk pertama dunia USD 1,3 miliar. Permintaan melonjak 6,4 kali.
      2022–2024: Absen valas. Fokus optimasi obligasi domestik (MGS/MGII).
      2025: Bersiap kembali ke pasar valas lewat bank sindikasi internasional.
      2026: Promosi rencana obligasi global baru USD 1 miliar.

      Hapus
    12. KASIH PAHAM : JAGA-JAGA ASET LEMAH
      -
      ๐Ÿšข ASET LAUT (TLDM)
      • LCS = MANGKRAK 15 YEARS BANNED NSM
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Kasus penundaan proyek Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) telah dilaporkan secara luas sejak tahun 2020 oleh PAC. Masalah terbaru mengenai pembatalan izin ekspor rudal Naval Strike Missile (NSM) oleh pemerintah Norwegia diverifikasi oleh laporan media internasional seperti USNI News - Norway Cancels Malonsian Contract for NSM serta media lokal Airtimes MY .
      -
      • LMS B1 = GUNBOAT NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Littoral Mission Ship (LMS) Batch 1 (Kelas Keris) yang dibeli dari China dengan persenjataan terbatas (hanya meriam) tanpa rudal atau torpedo. Ulasannya dimuat di jurnal Janis Navy International dan portal lokal Malonsian Defence.
      -
      • LMS B2 = DOWNGRADE BABUR CLASS NO TORPEDO
      Sumber/Verifikasi: LMS Batch 2 Berbeda dengan kelas Babur milik Pakistan yang memiliki kemampuan anti-kapal selam berat, LMS Batch 2 Malonsia difokuskan pada pertahanan udara dan anti-kapal permukaan. Proses peluncuran kapal ini dilaporkan oleh Naval News - Malonsia’s Third LMS Batch II Corvette Launched in Tรผrkiye.
      -
      • LEKIU & KASTURI = EXO B2 EXPIRED RADAR CMS USANG / NO TORPEDO
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Laporan mengenai modernisasi dan isu penuaan sistem Combat Management System (CMS) serta kedaluwarsanya rudal Exocet MM40 Block 2 pada kapal kelas Lekiu dan Kasturi dirilis oleh Jurnal Pertahanan Malonsia (Kementerian Pertahanan) dan buletin militer regional Asia Pacific Defense Journal.
      -
      • LAKSAMANA, KEDAH, PERDANA, HANDALAN, JERUNG = GUNBOAT NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Kapal-kapal tua ini (seperti Kelas Laksamana yang awalnya memiliki rudal Aspide/Otomat dan Kelas Perdana/Handalan) telah dicopot sistem rudalnya karena usia pakai yang habis. Status operasional ini terdaftar di direktori kapal perang dunia IHS Janes Fighting Ships.
      ________________________________________
      ✈️ ASET UDARA (TUDM)
      • SU-30MKM = LOW SERVICEABILITY SPAREPARTS EMBARGO
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Masalah rantai pasok suku cadang jet tempur Sukhoi dikonfirmasi oleh Kementerian Pertahanan Malonsia saat sidang Parlemen dan media analisis pertahanan Defense News
      -
      • F/A-18D HORNET = AGING AIRFRAME LIMITED QUANTITY (ONLY 7 UNITS)
      Sumber/Verifikasi: TUDM hanya mengoperasikan 8 unit Hornet (1 jatuh/rusak, tersisa 7-8 unit operasional). Ketergantungan terhadap persetujuan Amerika Serikat untuk upgrade sistem senjata dibahas dalam dokumen RMAF Capability Development Plan 2055 (CAP55).
      -
      • HAWK 108/208 = FREQUent CRASHES & MIG-29N = RETIRED TOTAL FAILURE
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Rentetan kecelakaan jet latihan/tempur Hawk 108/208 (termasuk insiden fatal di Pangkalan Udara Butterworth) dilaporkan resmi oleh Bernama (Kantor Berita Malonsia). Sementara status armada MiG-29N yang di-mothballed (disimpan/pensiun) di Kuantan
      -
      • FA-50M = LIGHTWEIGHT DELAYED DELIVERY & BANNED AMRAAM 120
      Sumber/Verifikasi: oleh media analisis militer Defence UA - U.S. Blocked AIM-120 Integration on FA-50 Jets, meskipun Malonsia terus mengupayakan integrasinya untuk Batch terbaru Defence Security Asia.
      ________________________________________
      ๐Ÿช– ASET DARAT (TDM)
      • PT-91M PENDEKAR = SPARES DISCONTINUED & ENGINE BREAKDOWN ON HIGHWAY
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Insiden mogoknya tank utama (MBT) PT-91M Pendekar di jalan raya Kuala Lumpur dilaporkan oleh media global CNN - Tank stops traffic as Malonsian army vehicles break down
      -
      • AV8 GEMPITA = TENDER IRREGULARITIES UNPAID FINES (RM162M)
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Kasus denda keterlambatan AV8 Gempita oleh DRB- Laporan Ketua Audit Negara (LKAN) Malonsia yang dipublikasikan secara terbuka kepada publik dan pers.
      -
      • MILDEF TARANTULA, CONDOR 4X4, & ASTROS II
      Sumber/Verifikasi: Penghentian operasional panser tua Condor dan Sibmas pada tahun 2023 diumumkan resmi oleh pihak Angkatan Darat Malonsia. Sedangkan analisis komersialitas Mildef Tarantula (HAPC 4x4 lokal) yang kesulitan menembus pasar skala besar sering dibahas di majalah Asian Defence Journal (ADJ).

      Hapus
    13. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      1. Overweight on Operating Expenditure
      • Over 40% of MALONYET defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, and allowances.
      • This leaves limited room for capital expenditure (procurement, upgrades, R&D).
      • Example: In 2024, RM8.2 billion was allocated for personnel costs, while only RM5.71 billion went to procurement.
      2. Fragmented Procurement Planning
      • The Ministry of Defence lacks a clear multi-year procurement roadmap.
      • Funding is often allocated year-to-year, making it hard to commit to long-term modernization projects.
      • This leads to delays, cost overruns, and underutilized platforms (e.g. the Littoral Combat Ship fiasco).
      3. Political Hesitation to Rebalance
      • Successive governments have been unwilling to cut personnel costs or restructure the armed forces.
      • Reducing manpower or retiring outdated equipment is politically sensitive, especially with veterans and civil service unions.
      4. Currency Depreciation & Import Dependence
      • MALONYET imports most of its defence equipment.
      • The weak ringgit erodes purchasing power, so even increased budgets don’t translate into real capability gains.
      5. Multi-Year Commitments Hidden in Annual Budgets
      • Annual allocations include progressive payments for past procurements (e.g. FA-50 jets, A400M upgrades).
      • These payments crowd out new investments, creating the illusion of fresh funding when it’s actually backlog servicing.

      Hapus
    14. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      ๐Ÿ›ก️ Why MALONYET Lags Behind in Defence Tech & Force Structure
      1. Limited Defence Budget & Allocation Inefficiency
      • MALONYET ’s defence budget is lower than Indonesia and Singapore, and a large portion goes to personnel costs, not modernization.
      • In contrast:
      o Indonesia: USD10.6 billion budget (2025), focused on maritime security and modernization
      o Singapore: USD15 billion budget, with 4.9% of GDP allocated to defence—the highest in ASEAN
      o Vietnam: Prioritizes coastal defence with diversified procurement from the U.S., South Korea, and Israel
      2. Outdated Equipment & Slow Modernization
      • MALONYET still operates legacy platforms like MiG-29s (retired), aging Scorpene submarines, and delayed Littoral Combat Ships.
      • Meanwhile:
      o Indonesia is acquiring Rafale jets, Scorpรจne-class submarines, and expanding naval bases
      o Singapore has F-35B stealth fighters, advanced UAVs, and integrated cyber warfare units
      o Vietnam is modernizing its Soviet-era arsenal and investing in coastal missile systems
      3. Force Structure Limitations
      • MALONYET ’s armed forces are fragmented and lack joint operational doctrine.
      • Singapore’s SAF is highly integrated, with tri-service coordination and advanced simulation training.
      • Indonesia and Vietnam maintain large active personnel (400,000 and 600,000 respectively), while MALONYET has ~110,000 with limited reserve depth1
      4. Strategic Doctrine & Regional Role
      • MALONYET ’s defence posture is non-confrontational, focused on internal security and humanitarian missions.
      • In contrast:
      o Indonesia asserts maritime dominance in the South China Sea and Malacca Strait.
      o Vietnam maintains a deterrence posture against China, especially in the Spratly Islands.
      o Singapore positions itself as a technological leader and regional training hub.

      Hapus
    15. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      What Are MALONYET Force Structure Limitations?
      1. Small Active Force Size
      • MALONYET has ~113,000 active personnel and ~51,600 reserves.
      • Compared to regional peers like Indonesia (~400,000) and Vietnam (~600,000), MALONYET manpower is modest.
      • This limits its ability to sustain multi-domain operations or respond to simultaneous threats across Peninsular and East MALONYET .
      2. Fragmented Tri-Service Coordination
      • The MALONYET n Army, Navy, and Air Force operate with limited joint doctrine and interoperability.
      • There’s no unified Joint Operations Command, which hampers integrated responses in complex scenarios (e.g. amphibious landings, cyber warfare).
      • Exercises like CARAT and Bersama Shield help, but internal coordination remains weak.
      3. Lack of Force Projection Capability
      • MALONYET lacks long-range strategic assets:
      o No aircraft carriers, heavy bombers, or ballistic missile systems
      o Limited aerial refueling and sealift capacity
      • This restricts MALONYET ability to deploy forces beyond its borders or sustain operations in contested zones like the South China Sea.
      4. Overreliance on Legacy Platforms
      • Many platforms are aging or obsolete, such as:
      o MiG-29s (retired), F/A-18Ds (limited numbers), and Scorpene submarines (aging)
      • Procurement delays (e.g. Littoral Combat Ships) have stalled modernization
      • New acquisitions like FA-50 jets and LMS Batch 2 are promising but not yet integrated into full operational doctrine

      Hapus
    16. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      ๐Ÿ› ️ What Does “Legacy Platforms” Mean?
      Legacy platforms refer to aging military equipment—aircraft, ships, vehicles, and systems—that are:
      • Outdated in technology
      • Costly to maintain
      • Operationally limited in modern combat scenarios
      MALONYET continues to operate many such platforms across its armed services.
      ๐Ÿ” Why MALONYET Overrelies on Legacy Platforms
      1. Budget Constraints & Prioritization Gaps
      • Defence spending has never been a top priority in MALONYET ’s national budget.
      • Most funds go to personnel costs, leaving little for capital upgrades.
      • Modernization plans are often delayed or cancelled due to economic pressures.
      2. Delayed Procurement Cycles
      • Example: The MiG-29N jets, delivered in 1995, were supposed to retire by 2010. But due to budget issues, their service was extended indefinitely.
      • The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, meant to replace aging naval assets, has faced years of delay, leaving the Navy reliant on older patrol vessels.
      3. Fragmented Modernization Strategy
      • MALONYET lacks a cohesive long-term procurement roadmap.
      • Acquisitions are often piecemeal, reactive, and politically driven.
      • This leads to a mix of platforms from Russia, the U.S., France, and China, complicating logistics and interoperability.
      4. Maintenance Burden
      • Legacy systems require frequent repairs, spare parts, and specialized technicians.
      • Example: MALONYET ’s fleet includes C-130 Hercules from the 1970s and CN-235s from the early 2000s.
      • These platforms consume budget without delivering modern capability.
      5. Capability Gaps
      • MALONYET ’s Air Force can only cover one-third of its territory with current aircraft.
      • The Navy lacks sufficient sealift, anti-submarine warfare, and maritime surveillance assets.
      • The Army relies on older armored vehicles with limited protection and mobility.

      Hapus
    17. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      ๐Ÿ” Why MALONYET Deterrence Is Reduced
      1. Limited Military Capabilities
      • MALONYET lacks strategic assets like long-range missiles, stealth aircraft, or advanced naval platforms.
      • Its air force has only 18 F/A-18Ds and is just beginning to induct FA-50 light fighters, which are not deterrent-grade.
      • The Navy’s delayed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program and aging submarines weaken maritime deterrence.
      2. Fragmented Force Structure
      • The armed forces operate in silos, with weak joint command and coordination.
      • This reduces operational effectiveness in multi-domain scenarios like amphibious defense or cyber warfare.
      3. Budget Constraints
      • Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs, leaving little for modernization.
      • MALONYET defence spending is ~1% of GDP, far below regional peers like Singapore (~4.9%).
      4. Technological Gaps
      • MALONYET defence tech lags behind in:
      o Cyber warfare
      o Electronic warfare
      o Unmanned systems
      • This limits its ability to counter modern threats like drones, grey-zone tactics, and hybrid warfare.

      Hapus
    18. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      MALONYET ’s Military Modernization Is Slow
      1. Budget Allocation Imbalance
      • Over 60–70% of the defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, and maintenance, leaving little for new systems or upgrades.
      • MALONYET spends around RM15–18 billion annually, but most of it is used to “keep the lights on” rather than invest in future capabilities.
      2. Procurement Delays & Scandals
      • The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program—meant to modernize the Navy—has faced years of delay, cost overruns, and corruption investigations2.
      • These setbacks have eroded public trust and stalled critical upgrades, leaving the Navy with outdated ships.
      3. Fragmented Modernization Strategy
      • MALONYET lacks a cohesive long-term defence roadmap.
      • Procurement is often reactive, driven by political cycles rather than strategic planning.
      • Result: a patchwork of platforms from Russia, the U.S., France, and China, complicating logistics and interoperability.
      4. Weak Indigenous Defence Industry
      • MALONYET ’s domestic defence sector focuses on maintenance and basic manufacturing, not advanced systems.
      • Outsourcing of maintenance since the 1970s was meant to build self-reliance, but it hasn’t scaled to meet modernization needs.
      5. Currency Depreciation & Fiscal Constraints
      • The weak ringgit reduces MALONYET ’s purchasing power for foreign defence equipment.
      • Declining oil revenues and economic pressures have shrunk the government’s coffers, limiting capital expenditure.

      Hapus
    19. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      ๐Ÿงญ Strategic and Policy Challenges
      • Lack of Clear Long-Term Vision: MALONYET ’s defence budgeting process often lacks transparency and predictability, making it difficult for the armed forces to plan long-term procurement and modernization programs.
      • Frequent Political Changes: Since 2018, MALONYET has seen multiple changes in government, which has disrupted continuity in defence planning and policy execution.
      ๐Ÿ’ฐ Budgetary Constraints
      • Limited Procurement Funding: Although the defence budget has increased to RM19.73 billion in 2024, over 40% is allocated to salaries and allowances, leaving relatively little for equipment upgrades and procurement.
      • Currency Depreciation: MALONYET relies heavily on foreign defence suppliers. The weakening ringgit reduces purchasing power, making imported equipment more expensive.
      ⚙️ Operational and Equipment Issues
      • Aging Equipment: Many platforms, such as the Condor Armoured Personnel Carriers, are outdated. Replacement plans are slow due to budget and bureaucratic hurdles.
      • Dependence on Foreign OEMs: Domestic defence manufacturing is still heavily reliant on foreign original equipment manufacturers, limiting self-reliance.
      ๐Ÿงช Technological and Industrial Limitations
      • Underdeveloped Defence Industry: MALONYET ’s local defence industry lacks the capacity to produce advanced systems independently, which hampers modernization efforts.
      • Low R&D Investment: There’s insufficient investment in defence science and technology, which affects innovation and indigenous capability development.
      ๐Ÿค Civil-Military Integration Issues
      • Misunderstanding of HANRUH Concept: The “Comprehensive Defence” (HANRUH) strategy is often misinterpreted as a purely military doctrine, rather than a whole-of-nation approach involving civil sectors.
      • Weak Civil-Military Collaboration: The fading spirit of civil-military synergy, once strong during the Malayan Emergency, has weakened over time.

      Hapus
    20. INDONESIA=
      KAPAL INDUK✔️
      AMRAAM✔️
      METEOR✔️
      HAMMER✔️
      FREGAT✔️
      SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
      48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
      42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
      16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
      33 F16✔️
      12 M346FA✔️
      20 T50i✔️
      24 HAWK✔️
      4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
      2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
      2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
      4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
      --------------------------------
      1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
      2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
      3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
      4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
      5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
      6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
      7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
      8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
      9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
      ===============
      ===============
      MALONYET
      18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
      18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
      7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
      16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
      NSM BANNED❌
      AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
      F18 BATAL❌
      UH60A BATAL❌
      REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
      SIPRI KOSONG❌
      --------------------------------
      FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
      LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
      MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
      DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
      -
      FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
      BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
      AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
      ---------------------------------
      2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
      2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
      2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
      1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
      1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
      --------------------------------
      1967: USCG DECISIVE
      1968: USCGC STEADFAST
      1980: KM PERWIRA
      1984: LERICI CLASS
      1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
      1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
      1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
      --------------------------------
      ๐Ÿ“Œ 1. Overview of MALONYET ’s Local Defense Industry
      • MALONYET has several state-linked defense companies like Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), DefTech, SME Ordnance, ATSC (Aerospace Technology Systems Corporation).
      • However, compared to Singapore’s ST Engineering or Indonesia’s PT Pindad/PT PAL/PT Dirgantara, MALONYET ’s industry is:
      o Small in scale
      o Heavily dependent on foreign technology transfer
      o Politically influenced
      o Limited in R&D capacity
      ๐Ÿ“Œ 2. Structural Weaknesses
      a. Overdependence on Foreign Technology
      • Local companies rarely design or develop indigenous platforms.
      • Instead, they assemble or license-build:
      o AV-8 Gempita → Turkish FNSS design
      o LCS Gowind-class → French Naval Group design
      o DefTech trucks/APCs → based on imported chassis
      • This makes MALONYET vulnerable when foreign partners withdraw or when funding for ToT (Transfer of Technology) dries up.
      b. Limited R&D and Innovation
      • Defense R&D budgets are tiny (well under 1% of defense spending).
      • No serious indigenous aircraft, ship, or armored vehicle program has emerged.
      • MALONYET lacks the ecosystem (universities + defense labs + industry partnerships) that Singapore and South Korea used to build self-reliant industries.
      c. Project Mismanagement
      • Local companies given prestige projects beyond their capacity.
      • Example:
      o Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) with the RM9 billion Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program.
      o BNS failed to deliver even 1 ship by 2025, despite billions spent.
      o Poor project management, design changes, and alleged corruption highlight the weakness of local capability.

      Hapus
  10. INDONESIA=
    KAPAL INDUK✔️
    AMRAAM✔️
    METEOR✔️
    HAMMER✔️
    FREGAT✔️
    SIPRI SHOPPING✔️
    48 KAAN Gen 5✔️
    42 RAFALE Gen 4.5✔️
    16 Sukhoi 27/30✔️
    33 F16✔️
    12 M346FA✔️
    20 T50i✔️
    24 HAWK✔️
    4 FREEGAT MERAH PUTIH✔️
    2 PPA BRAWIJAYA CLASS✔️
    2 FREEGAT ISTIF✔️
    4 SCORPENE EVOLVED✔️
    --------------------------------
    1. BUDGET MILITER USD 20 MILIAR vs USD 4,7 MILIAR
    2. BUDGET 1 UNIT RAFALE = 4 UNIT FA50M
    3. BUDGET 1 UNIT PPA = 3 UNIT LMS B2
    4. BUDGET 1 UNIT SCORPENE IDN = 2 UNIT SCORPENE MALONYET
    5. CN 235 US$ 27,50 JUTA = ATR 72 US$24.7 JUTA
    6. BUDGET SEWA 28 HELI = BUDGET 119 HELI BARU
    7. BUDGET 1 UNIT APACHE = 13 UNIT MD530G
    8. UCAV ANKA vs ANKA ISR NOT ARMED
    9. BUDGET 1 UNIT LCS EXCLUDING AMMO = 1 UNIT DESTROYER INCLUDING AMMO
    ===============
    ===============
    MALONYET
    18 FA50Murah (10 LCA + 8 LIFT) = LACK BVR AMRAAM❌
    18 Sukhoi (4 Serviceable) = LACK MAINTENANCE❌
    7 F18 = LACK SOURCE CODE❌
    16 HAWK = LACK SPAREPART❌
    NSM BANNED❌
    AMRAAM BLOKIR❌
    F18 BATAL❌
    UH60A BATAL❌
    REWORK 4000 PIPA DAN KABEL❌
    SIPRI KOSONG❌
    --------------------------------
    FA-50M VERSI DOWNGRADE FA50PL✔️
    LMS B2 VERSI DOWNGRDE BABUR CLASS✔️
    MD530G VERSI SIPIL DOWNGRADE AH-6i✔️
    DOWNGRADE = SPEK TERMURAH BAWAH hahahaha
    -
    FA50 PL USD 60 JUTA vs FA50Murah USD 50 JUTA+VERSI BARTER
    BABUR CLASS USD 300 JUTA vs LMS B2 USD 150 JUTA+VERSI NO TORPEDO NO SONAR
    AH=6I USD 20 JUTA vs MD530G USD 12 JUTA+VERSI TRAINING
    ---------------------------------
    2003: PERDANA MENTERI – DEFACT KILL PREGNANT WOMEN
    2011: LCS – DELAYED 16 YEARS BANNED NSM
    2018: LMS B1 – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2024: LMS B2 – NO SONAR NO TORPEDO
    1994: LEKIU – EXO B2 EXPIRED
    1981: KASTURI – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1982: LAKSAMANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    2002: KEDAH – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1971: PERDANA – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1976: HANDALAN – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    1975: JERUNG – NO MISSILE NO TORPEDO
    --------------------------------
    1967: USCG DECISIVE
    1968: USCGC STEADFAST
    1980: KM PERWIRA
    1984: LERICI CLASS
    1989: PL-01 OJIMA & PL-02 ERIMO – EX-JCG HIBAH
    1989: KM ARAU – EX-OKI PL-01 REPAIR JAPAN
    1990: KM PEKAN – OJIKA CLASS TRANSFERRED..
    --------------------------------
    ๐Ÿงพ 1. Cronyism in Defence Contracts
    • Defence contracts are frequently awarded to companies with political connections or ties to retired military officers, rather than based on merit or technical capability.
    • Analysts have pointed out that unqualified firms often win major tenders, resulting in poor execution and missed deadlines.
    • For example, the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project—initially a RM9 billion contract—was plagued by mismanagement. Despite over RM6 billion being paid, none of the six ships were delivered on time.
    ⚠️ 2. Conflict of Interest in Procurement
    • In some cases, contracts have been awarded to companies linked to former defence officials or their families, raising serious questions about impartiality.
    • The Self-Propelled Howitzer (SPH) deal faced scrutiny when it was revealed that a company involved had ties to a former deputy defence minister’s family. This prompted public backlash and calls for renegotiation.
    ๐Ÿ’ธ 3. Financial Mismanagement and Delays
    • Crony-linked firms often lack the technical expertise or financial stability to manage complex defence projects.
    • This leads to:
    o Delayed deliveries (e.g., offshore patrol vessels handed over three years late)
    o Cost overruns (LCS project now revised to over RM11 billion)
    o Unaccounted spending with little transparency or oversight
    ๐Ÿงญ 4. Weak Enforcement and Accountability
    • Experts have questioned the government’s willingness to pursue legal action against companies that fail to deliver.
    • There’s concern that lawsuits could expose deeper corruption within the procurement system, making authorities hesitant to act.

    BalasHapus