06 Agustus 2026

Korps Marinir Adakan Kajian Meriam Howitzer 105mm LG1 MK III

06 Agustus 2026

Presentasi howitzer 105 mm LG1 MK III (photo: Korps Marinir)

Dispen Kormar TNI Angkatan Laut (Jakarta) -- Panglima Korps Marinir (Pangkormar) Letjen TNI (Mar) Dr. Endi Supardi, S.E., M.M., M.Tr.Opsla., CHRMP., CRMP., berkenan menerima Presentasi dan Diskusi Teknis Meriam Howitzer 105 mm LG1 MK III produk KNDS Prancis yang berlangsung di Golf Driving Range Cilandak, Jakarta Selatan, Senin (03/08/2026).

Pada kegiatan tersebut, Pangkormar didampingi Kepala Staf Korps Marinir, Mayjen TNI (Mar) Suherlan, Ir. Kormar, Komandan Pasmar 1 yang diwakili oleh Aslog Danpasmar 1, Asrena Pangkormar, Aster Pangkormar, Sahli A Bidang Operasi Kormar, Waaslog Kormar, Waasrena Kormar, Kadisenlekal Kormar, Danmenart 1 Mar, serta Danyon Howitzer 1 Mar.


Kegiatan diawali dengan pemaparan oleh Direktur PT Lentera Sumber Makmur Mayjen TNI (Purn) Dwi Jati Utomo mengenai kemampuan, spesifikasi teknis, serta perkembangan teknologi Meriam Howitzer 105 mm LG1 MK III. Sistem senjata artileri medan ringan ini memiliki mobilitas tinggi, bobot yang ringan, laju tembak yang optimal, serta dirancang untuk memberikan dukungan tembakan secara efektif dalam berbagai operasi tempur.

Dalam suasana diskusi yang berlangsung interaktif, dibahas berbagai aspek teknis, operasional, hingga dukungan logistik dan pemeliharaan sistem senjata. Kegiatan ini menjadi sarana bertukar informasi dan pengetahuan mengenai perkembangan teknologi alutsista modern yang dapat menjadi bahan kajian dalam mendukung peningkatan kemampuan tempur Korps Marinir TNI Angkatan Laut.


Pada kesempatan tersebut, Pangkormar menekankan bahwa setiap pengembangan kemampuan tempur Korps Marinir harus didukung oleh alutsista yang modern, andal, dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan operasional di lapangan. Oleh karena itu, setiap pemaparan teknologi pertahanan harus dikaji secara komprehensif dengan mempertimbangkan aspek kemampuan tempur, interoperabilitas, dukungan logistik, pemeliharaan, serta efektivitas penggunaannya dalam mendukung pelaksanaan tugas Korps Marinir di masa mendatang.

Melalui kegiatan ini, Korps Marinir terus berupaya mengikuti perkembangan teknologi pertahanan modern sebagai bagian

15 komentar:

  1. LCA : MAHAL346F VERSUS FA50MURAH
    -
    HARGA PER UNIT
    FA-50M (Korsel): USD 50,5 juta/unit.
    M-346 F Block 20 (Italia): USD 145 juta/unit (1 unit = 3 unit FA-50M).
    Rafale F4 (Prancis): USD 192,8 juta/unit (1 unit = 4 unit FA-50M).
    -
    HARGA PESAWAT FA-50 FIGHTING EAGLE =
    1. Polandia: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit GF (±US$58 juta/unit) + US$2,3 miliar untuk 36 unit FA-50PL (±US$64 juta/unit).
    2. Filipina: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit (±US$58 juta/unit).
    3. MALAYSEWA : US$920 juta untuk 18 unit (±US$51 juta/unit).
    -
    10 LCA + 8 LIFT
    Sumber Kontrak FA-50M Malaysia
    Global: Janes, Aviacionline, Global Defense Corp, K-Defense News.
    Lokal: Malaysian Defence, KAI, Yonhap.
    -
    7 F18 USANG
    Sumber Kecelakaan F/A-18D Hornet (21 Ags 2025)
    Media: The Star, NST, FMT, The Edge, Detiknews, Kompas.
    Resmi: TUDM, Bernama/RTM, Kepolisian Pahang, ASN Wikibase.
    --------------------------------
    πŸ“Œ 1. Nature of Corruption in Defense
    Defense procurement is especially vulnerable in MALAYSEWA because:
    Contracts are opaque, often labeled “national security” (no public scrutiny).
    Deals are politically negotiated, not based on military needs.
    Offsets and local content requirements create opportunities for rent-seeking.
    Oversight is weak; Parliament rarely audits defense deals in depth.
    ________________________________________
    πŸ“Œ 2. Major Examples of Corruption & Mismanagement
    a. Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal
    Budget: RM9 billion (≈ USD 2B) approved in 2011.
    Plan: 6 Gowind-class stealth frigates (from France/Thales-DCNS via Boustead Naval Shipyard).
    Reality:
    By 2022, not a single ship delivered despite RM6B already spent.
    Designs were changed mid-way without Navy approval.
    Funds misused → overpriced contracts, subcontracting to cronies.
    Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) found “serious mismanagement & corruption.”
    Effect: MALAYSEWA ’s navy today still lacks new major combatants.
    ________________________________________
    b. Scorpène Submarine Scandal (2002 deal)
    MALAYSEWA bought 2 French Scorpène submarines (~EUR 1B).
    Allegations:
    Commissions of over EUR 100M paid to MALAYSEWA n middlemen.
    Linked to Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case (Mongolian translator who was investigating kickbacks).
    Submarines delivered, but maintenance problems + corruption controversy damaged credibility.
    ________________________________________
    c. AV8 Gempita Armored Vehicles
    Contract: RM7.5 billion for 257 vehicles (with Turkish FNSS tech transfer).
    Issues:
    Final unit cost very high (~USD 7M per vehicle, more expensive than Western IFVs).
    Questionable whether MALAYSEWA needed so many heavy IFVs for its geography.
    Seen as more of an industrial project for DRB-HICOM than a military necessity.
    ________________________________________
    d. Helicopter & Aircraft Procurement
    MD530G light scout helicopters → ordered in 2016 (RM321M), but delivery delayed for years.
    Spare parts for Nuri helicopters (now retired) were procured at inflated prices.
    Many contracts allegedly awarded to politically connected firms with no expertise.
    ________________________________________
    πŸ“Œ 3. Forms of Mismanagement
    Overpricing → MALAYSEWA pays higher than global market prices.
    Delayed Deliveries → money spent, assets not delivered on time (or never).
    Capability Mismatch → politicians push prestige projects instead of what the armed forces need.
    Maintenance Neglect → assets delivered but poorly supported (e.g., Su-30MKM spare parts issue).
    Cronyism in Local Industry → contracts given to politically linked companies (Boustead, DRB-HICOM, etc.).

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. LCA : MAHAL346F VERSUS FA50MURAH
      -
      HARGA PER UNIT
      FA-50M (Korsel): USD 50,5 juta/unit.
      M-346 F Block 20 (Italia): USD 145 juta/unit (1 unit = 3 unit FA-50M).
      Rafale F4 (Prancis): USD 192,8 juta/unit (1 unit = 4 unit FA-50M).
      -
      HARGA PESAWAT FA-50 FIGHTING EAGLE =
      1. Polandia: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit GF (±US$58 juta/unit) + US$2,3 miliar untuk 36 unit FA-50PL (±US$64 juta/unit).
      2. Filipina: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit (±US$58 juta/unit).
      3. MALAYSEWA : US$920 juta untuk 18 unit (±US$51 juta/unit).
      -
      10 LCA + 8 LIFT
      Sumber Kontrak FA-50M Malaysia
      Global: Janes, Aviacionline, Global Defense Corp, K-Defense News.
      Lokal: Malaysian Defence, KAI, Yonhap.
      -
      7 F18 USANG
      Sumber Kecelakaan F/A-18D Hornet (21 Ags 2025)
      Media: The Star, NST, FMT, The Edge, Detiknews, Kompas.
      Resmi: TUDM, Bernama/RTM, Kepolisian Pahang, ASN Wikibase.
      --------------------------------
      πŸ“Œ 1. What is Fiscal Space?
      Fiscal space = the government’s capacity to spend without threatening debt sustainability.
      For defense, it means: how much room MALAYSEWA has in its annual budget to allocate funds for military modernization, operations, and maintenance.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 2. Why MALAYSEWA Has Limited Fiscal Space
      a. High National Debt
      As of mid-2025: Debt = RM1.3 trillion (~69% of GDP).
      Much higher than during the 2000s (below 55%).
      Debt servicing (interest payments) alone takes up 15–17% of annual federal revenue.
      This squeezes out spending on “non-priority” sectors like defense.
      ________________________________________
      b. Revenue Constraints
      MALAYSEWA ’s tax base is relatively small.
      GST (Goods & Services Tax) abolished in 2018 → replaced by SST (Sales & Service Tax).
      GST: broad, efficient, higher revenue.
      SST: narrower, less revenue.
      Oil & gas revenue is volatile (20–25% of government income), so during oil price slumps, fiscal stress rises.
      ________________________________________
      c. Competing Social Priorities
      Large commitments to:
      Education & health (biggest budget shares).
      Fuel subsidies & cash assistance programs.
      Infrastructure projects.
      Defense is politically unpopular → gets < 1% of GDP annually, one of the lowest in ASEAN.
      ________________________________________
      d. Rigid Operating Expenditure
      Around 70% of defense budget goes to salaries, pensions, and allowances.
      Very little left for capital expenditure (procurement & modernization).
      Fiscal rigidities make it impossible to redirect funds without upsetting powerful civil service & veterans’ groups.
      ________________________________________
      e. Currency Weakness
      Ringgit depreciation against USD (RM4.70–RM4.80 in 2025) makes imported defense systems much more expensive.
      Every billion USD contract now costs far more in local currency terms, shrinking what MALAYSEWA can buy.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 3. Effects on Military Spending
      Annual defense budget stuck at ~RM15–19 billion (0.9–1% of GDP).
      Compare:
      Singapore: ~3–4% of GDP.
      Indonesia: 1–1.2% of GDP, but on a much bigger GDP base.
      Result: MALAYSEWA ’s defense envelope is too small to cover both O&M (operations & maintenance) and procurement.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 4. Consequences for Military Procurement
      Delayed Programs → MRCA fighter jets, LCS frigates, helicopters.
      Cancelled or Downsized Orders → e.g., MRCA reduced to LCA, Black Hawk leasing plan shrunk then collapsed.
      Inability to Commit to Multi-Year Plans → no guaranteed funding stream.
      Patchwork Modernization → instead of comprehensive upgrades, MALAYSEWA buys in piecemeal fashion.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 5. Strategic Impact
      MALAYSEWA cannot sustain credible deterrence in South China Sea.
      Must rely heavily on diplomacy and ASEAN forums instead of hard power.
      Forces risk becoming a “hollow military”: large on paper, weak in practice.

      Hapus
    2. LCA : MAHAL346F VERSUS FA50MURAH
      -
      HARGA PER UNIT
      FA-50M (Korsel): USD 50,5 juta/unit.
      M-346 F Block 20 (Italia): USD 145 juta/unit (1 unit = 3 unit FA-50M).
      Rafale F4 (Prancis): USD 192,8 juta/unit (1 unit = 4 unit FA-50M).
      -
      HARGA PESAWAT FA-50 FIGHTING EAGLE =
      1. Polandia: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit GF (±US$58 juta/unit) + US$2,3 miliar untuk 36 unit FA-50PL (±US$64 juta/unit).
      2. Filipina: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit (±US$58 juta/unit).
      3. MALAYSEWA : US$920 juta untuk 18 unit (±US$51 juta/unit).
      -
      10 LCA + 8 LIFT
      Sumber Kontrak FA-50M Malaysia
      Global: Janes, Aviacionline, Global Defense Corp, K-Defense News.
      Lokal: Malaysian Defence, KAI, Yonhap.
      -
      7 F18 USANG
      Sumber Kecelakaan F/A-18D Hornet (21 Ags 2025)
      Media: The Star, NST, FMT, The Edge, Detiknews, Kompas.
      Resmi: TUDM, Bernama/RTM, Kepolisian Pahang, ASN Wikibase.
      --------------------------------
      πŸ“Œ 1. What Policy Flip-Flops Mean in Procurement
      In MALAYSEWA ’s case:
      A procurement program is announced, then delayed, cancelled, or changed.
      Often re-started later under different specs, suppliers, or budget levels.
      Result: equipment arrives 10–20 years late — or never at all.
      These flip-flops waste money, damage credibility, and create long gaps in capabilities.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 2. Key Drivers of Procurement Flip-Flops
      Frequent Government Changes → new prime minister or defense minister wants to review/restart.
      Budget Constraints → once economy slows, defense is first to be cut.
      Scandals/Corruption → programs frozen or restructured.
      Shifting Priorities → suddenly focus on cheaper “interim” solutions.
      Lack of Multi-Year Funding → no guarantee a program survives beyond one budget cycle.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 3. Case Studies of Procurement Flip-Flops
      ✈️ MRCA Fighter Program
      2007: MALAYSEWA starts plan to replace MiG-29 (retired 2017).
      2010–2015: Bidders included Rafale, Eurofighter, Gripen, Su-35, F/A-18E.
      2015: Najib defers due to budget.
      2018: Mahathir cancels MRCA, shifts to LCA (Light Combat Aircraft).
      2021: RMAF issues tender → 2023 chooses FA-50 (Korea).
      Flip-Flop Outcome: 20 years of talk, still no MRCA fleet by 2025. Only stopgap FA-50 arriving 2026.
      ________________________________________
      🚒 Littoral Combat Ship (LCS)
      2011: Approved → 6 ships (RM9b).
      2014–2018: Delays + corruption scandals.
      2019: PH gov stops payments pending audit.
      2020: PN gov restarts but restructures.
      2022: Again reviewed, delivery pushed to 2029.
      Flip-Flop Outcome: After 14 years, 0 ships delivered, billions sunk.
      ________________________________________
      🚁 Helicopter Replacement (Nuri/Medium-Lift)
      2017: Nuri retired abruptly → big air mobility gap.
      2018–2019: PH gov cancels procurement, proposes leasing option.
      2021: Leasing plan with 12 helicopters → downsized to 4 Black Hawks.
      2023: Contract collapses due to dispute.
      Flip-Flop Outcome: Still no medium-lift replacement by 2025. Army depends on ad-hoc leased platforms.
      ________________________________________
      πŸͺ– Army Armored Vehicles
      1980s-era Condor APCs still in service.
      2011: Order for 257 AV-8 Gempita → delivered but overpriced.
      Plan for new 4x4 and 6x6 vehicles → multiple tenders cancelled, restarted, then frozen.
      Flip-Flop Outcome: MALAYSEWA lacks a coherent APC fleet, stuck with old Condors.

      Hapus
  2. FACT 5x KING MALONYET =ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
    FACT 5x PM MALONYET = ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
    FACT 6x MINDEF MALONYET = ZONK MRCA SPH LCS NSM
    -
    NOT PAID FFBNP = NO SHOPPING BUT LEASING
    NOT PAID FFBNP = NO SHOPPING BUT LEASING
    --------------------------------
    1️⃣ MALAYSEWA DEBT DATA 2026
    -
    Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion
    -
    Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion
    -
    Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
    -
    Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% (Exceeding the 65% GDP statutory limit)
    -
    Total Population of Malaysewa (2026): 36,385,115 citizens
    --------------------------------
    2️⃣ PER CAPITA DEBT CALCULATION FOR MALAYSEWA (2026)
    -
    Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
    -
    Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
    -
    ➡ Total Cumulative Debt Burden Per Capita: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
    --------------------------------
    5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
    πŸ“Œ 1. Procurement Weaknesses
    a. Stop–Go Procurement
    Major projects (fighters, ships, armored vehicles) are often announced, delayed, or cancelled depending on which government is in power.
    No stable multi-year defense budget → contractors cannot plan effectively → delays & cost escalation.
    Example:
    MRCA fighter replacement: in discussion since 2009, but never finalized → MiG-29s retired in 2017 without replacement.
    ________________________________________
    b. Political Interference
    Contracts sometimes awarded to politically connected companies rather than the most capable suppliers.
    Domestic firms given contracts they cannot deliver on, leading to project mismanagement.
    Example:
    Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal: RM9 billion allocated in 2011 for 6 ships. As of 2025, none are delivered, funds mismanaged, and Navy stuck with 1980s-era ships.
    ________________________________________
    c. Corruption & Lack of Transparency
    Defense procurement in MALAYSEWA has often been opaque, with corruption scandals undermining delivery.
    This creates mistrust in both local industry and international partners.
    ________________________________________
    πŸ“Œ 2. Supply Chain Weaknesses
    a. Heavy Foreign Dependence
    MALAYSEWA imports almost all high-end systems:
    Fighters → Russia, US, UK
    Ships → France, Germany, locally assembled with foreign parts
    Vehicles → Turkey, South Korea
    Spare parts must come from abroad, which is expensive, slow, and vulnerable to geopolitical disruptions.
    ________________________________________
    b. Poor Local Industrial Capacity
    Local defense industry (Boustead, DefTech, etc.) has limited expertise.
    They rely on foreign designs and technology transfer.
    When local firms are given contracts they cannot handle → projects stall or quality suffers.
    ________________________________________
    c. Spare Parts Shortages
    Weak procurement planning → parts not stockpiled properly.
    Old systems (MiG-29s, Condors, etc.) → parts no longer manufactured.
    This leads to “cannibalization”, where one aircraft or vehicle is stripped to keep others running.

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. LCA : MAHAL346F VERSUS FA50MURAH
      -
      HARGA PER UNIT
      FA-50M (Korsel): USD 50,5 juta/unit.
      M-346 F Block 20 (Italia): USD 145 juta/unit (1 unit = 3 unit FA-50M).
      Rafale F4 (Prancis): USD 192,8 juta/unit (1 unit = 4 unit FA-50M).
      -
      HARGA PESAWAT FA-50 FIGHTING EAGLE =
      1. Polandia: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit GF (±US$58 juta/unit) + US$2,3 miliar untuk 36 unit FA-50PL (±US$64 juta/unit).
      2. Filipina: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit (±US$58 juta/unit).
      3. MALAYSEWA : US$920 juta untuk 18 unit (±US$51 juta/unit).
      -
      10 LCA + 8 LIFT
      Sumber Kontrak FA-50M Malaysia
      Global: Janes, Aviacionline, Global Defense Corp, K-Defense News.
      Lokal: Malaysian Defence, KAI, Yonhap.
      -
      7 F18 USANG
      Sumber Kecelakaan F/A-18D Hornet (21 Ags 2025)
      Media: The Star, NST, FMT, The Edge, Detiknews, Kompas.
      Resmi: TUDM, Bernama/RTM, Kepolisian Pahang, ASN Wikibase.
      --------------------------------
      πŸ“Œ 1. Why Training Hours Matter
      Training hours = the amount of time pilots, sailors, soldiers spend actively practicing their skills.
      In modern militaries, high training tempo is crucial to:
      Keep proficiency with complex equipment.
      Build unit cohesion.
      Maintain combat readiness.
      If training hours fall below international standards, equipment becomes almost useless in real combat.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 2. MALAYSEWA ’s Low Training Hours – Causes
      ✈️ Air Force (RMAF)
      Fighter pilots should have 150–180 flight hours per year (NATO standard).
      Many RMAF pilots only get 60–80 hours annually due to:
      Limited fuel budget.
      Spare parts shortages.
      Aircraft availability problems (MiG-29 retired, Su-30 often grounded).
      ________________________________________
      🚒 Navy (RMN)
      Warships should spend 90–120 days at sea per year to maintain readiness.
      RMN vessels average 30–50 days at sea, far below requirement.
      Reasons:
      Budget cuts for fuel and logistics.
      Maintenance backlogs (many patrol vessels >40 years old).
      LCS program delays leaving capability gaps.
      ________________________________________
      πŸͺ– Army (TDM)
      Modern armies conduct large-scale combined arms exercises regularly.
      TDM focuses on small-scale, low-cost jungle training instead.
      Limited live-fire, armored maneuvers, or joint training with air/navy units.
      Fuel & ammunition budgets are often capped → less field time.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 3. Impact of Low Training Hours
      a. Skill Degradation
      Pilots risk losing combat proficiency (dogfighting, weapons delivery).
      Sailors struggle with complex operations (anti-submarine warfare, missile defense).
      Soldiers lack practice in modern combined-arms tactics.
      ________________________________________
      b. Safety Risks
      Low training hours lead to higher accident rates.
      Example: RMAF has had multiple crashes (Hawk, Nuri) linked partly to training gaps & maintenance issues.
      ________________________________________
      c. Reduced Interoperability
      Joint operations (Air–Land–Sea) require constant practice.
      Without adequate exercises, coordination is weak.
      Limits MALAYSEWA ’s ability to operate with allies (e.g., Five Power Defence Arrangements with Singapore, UK, Australia, New Zealand).
      ________________________________________
      d. Wasted Equipment Investment
      Even when MALAYSEWA buys modern platforms (e.g., Su-30MKM, Scorpène submarines), lack of training hours means underutilization.
      Submarine crews need at least 150 sea-days per year → RMN ScorpΓ¨nes often achieve far less.
      ________________________________________
      e. Morale & Retention Problems
      Professional soldiers want to train and improve.
      When budgets restrict them to desk duty or symbolic exercises, morale falls.
      Leads to difficulties in retaining skilled pilots and officers, who may leave for commercial jobs.

      Hapus
    2. MALONYET = GOVT DEBT 70,5% HOUSEHOLD 84,3% TO GDP = NOT PAID FFBNP
      REVENUE: RM334.1 BILLION
      EXPENDITURE: RM470 BILLION
      SUBSIDY BURDEN: 23.9%
      BORROWING TO REPAY DEBT: RM470 – RM334.1 = DEFICIT OF RM135.9
      ------------------------------
      NOT PAID FFBNP = NO SHOPPING BUT LEASING
      NOT PAID FFBNP = NO SHOPPING BUT LEASING
      ------------------------------
      GOVERNMENT REVENUE =
      Ranges from RM334.1 Billion to RM343.1 Billion (75.8% from taxes and 24.2% non-tax/Petronas).
      -
      TOTAL EXPENDITURE =
      Reaches RM419.2 Billion to RM470 Billion.
      -
      BUDGET ALLOCATION =
      RM338.2 Billion is spent on operations (salaries, pensions, subsidies) and only RM81 Billion for infrastructure development.
      -
      MAIN REASONS FOR BORROWING =
      REVENUE COMPLETELY DEPLETED:
      Pure operating costs (RM338.2 Billion) directly consume nearly 100% of all incoming government revenue.
      -
      CHRONIC BUDGET DEFICIT:
      The massive gap between revenue and total spending creates a deficit hole of 3.5% to 3.6% of GDP.
      -
      CHRONIC BUDGET DEFICIT:
      The wide gulf between total revenue (~RM343 billion) and total expenditure (~RM419–RM470 billion) creates a budget deficit ranging from 3.5% to 3.6% of the country's GDP. The only way for the MALAYSEWA government to plug this tens-of-billions-of-ringgit funding gap is by ISSUING NEW GOVERNMENT BONDS.
      --------------------------------------------
      MALAYSEWA DEBT DATA 2026
      Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion (Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% - Statutory Limit: 65%)
      Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion (Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% - Statutory Limit: 65%)
      MALAYSEWA Population 2026: 36,385,115 people
      -
      DEBT PER CAPITA CALCULATION FOR MALAYSEWA 2026
      Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
      Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
      ➡️ TOTAL CUMULATIVE BURDEN PER CITIZEN: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
      ---------------------------------
      Kelumpuhan Matra Pertahanan (Analisis SIPRI)
      Data menunjukkan adanya degradasi progresif dari perencanaan ke ketiadaan aktivitas total:
      Vakum Total (2024–2025): Status "KOSONG" pada SIPRI mengonfirmasi tidak adanya kontrak baru atau transfer senjata berat. Ini menandakan hilangnya daya beli di pasar alutsista global.
      Kegagalan Akuisisi: Pembatalan berulang (seperti F/A-18 Kuwait) dan status Selected Not Yet Ordered mencerminkan ketidakpastian anggaran yang kronis.
      Model "Military-for-Rent": Pergeseran dari kepemilikan menjadi skema Leasing (Sewa) pada lebih dari 32 item (Helikopter, Simulator, dll.) menunjukkan militer hanya mampu membiayai operasional jangka pendek tanpa investasi aset strategis jangka panjang.
      -
      Krisis Fiskal: "Debt-Servicing Trap"
      Struktur ekonomi terjebak dalam siklus utang yang tidak sehat:
      Gali Lubang Tutup Lubang: Sejak 2019, rata-rata di atas 50% hingga 64% pinjaman baru hanya digunakan untuk membayar pokok dan bunga utang lama (principal repayment), bukan untuk pembangunan produktif.
      Rasio Kritis: Utang nasional yang diproyeksikan menyentuh RM 1,79 Triliun (2026) dengan rasio utang pemerintah 69% GDP telah melampaui batas aman fiskal.
      Ketergantungan Barter: Penggunaan CPO (Kelapa Sawit) sebagai alat bayar alutsista (FA-50, Scorpene) mengonfirmasi keterbatasan cadangan devisa tunai.
      -
      Degradasi Kredibilitas Internasional & Domestik
      Global Firepower (GFP) 2026: Penurunan ke peringkat 42 (disalip Filipina) adalah konsekuensi logis dari banyaknya aset yang grounded (MiG-29) dan skandal hilangnya inventaris (mesin jet/Skyhawk).
      Kritik Kepemimpinan: Pernyataan keras Mahathir (tentang etos kerja) dan fokus Anwar Ibrahim pada "Tata Kelola" (pemberantasan korupsi proyek banjir) menunjukkan bahwa masalah utama bukan sekadar teknis, melainkan sistemik dan administratif.
      Tekanan Eksternal: Ancaman sanksi tarif AS (Section 301) menambah beban pada sektor manufaktur yang merupakan tulang punggung ekonomi.

      Hapus
  3. NATO SAYS = MALON JUST BANANA REPUBLIC BANNED NSM
    INDONESIA NASAMS = DIKIRIM KONGSBERG, NORWEGIA
    MALAYDESH FFBNP NSM = BANNED KONGSBERG, NORWEGIA
    --------------------------------
    INDONESIA: NASAMS 2 (TERKIRIM & AKTIF)
    -
    Status: Pembelian berhasil, sistem terkirim, dan aktif digunakan.
    Komponen Buatan Norwegia (Kongsberg):
    Pusat Kendali: Pos komando taktis Fire Distribution Center (FDC) untuk deteksi dan eksekusi target.
    Peluncur Rudal: Unit peluncur multi-rudal berbasis darat.
    Sistem Komunikasi: Jaringan radio taktis dan integrasi sistem.
    Komponen Buatan Amerika Serikat (Raytheon):
    Radar: Sistem pengintai AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel untuk melacak target.
    Amunisi Utama: Rudal aktif AIM-120 AMRAAM.
    Skema Pengadaan: Dibeli terpisah lewat kesepakatan antarpemerintah (Government-to-Government / G2G) dengan AS.
    =======================
    =======================
    FFBNP NOT PAID - MALAYDESH: NAVAL STRIKE MISSILE / NSM (BATAL & DIBLOKIR)
    -
    Status: Pemerintah Norwegia membatalkan sepihak lisensi ekspor rudal dan peluncur NSM ke Malaydesh karena alasan geopolitik.
    Dampak & Respon Malaydesh:
    Tuntutan Hukum: Malaydesh menuntut kompensasi sebesar RM1,05 miliar dari Kongsberg.
    Sanksi Balasan: Malaydesh membekukan semua pengadaan pertahanan dari Norwegia.
    Bukti Pemberitaan Media:
    Media Nasional Malaydesh: Berita Harian (kronologi pembatalan), New Straits Times (negosiasi klaim kompensasi), dan Air Times Malaydesh (rincian angka tuntutan RM1,05 miliar).
    Media Internasional: Associated Press (konfirmasi sikap resmi Oslo), USNI News (analisis pembatalan dari sisi militer maritim), Defence Security Asia (pembekuan pengadaan oleh Malaydesh), dan The New Arab (analisis alasan geopolitik pembatalan).
    --------------------------------
    Status Pengadaan Alutsista (SIPRI 2020–2025)
    2020–2021: Status Planned (Hanya rencana/dijangka).
    2022: Status Selected Not Yet Ordered (Pemenang dipilih, tapi kontrak belum diteken).
    2023: Status Not Yet Ordered (Tanpa pesanan resmi).
    2024–2025: Status KOSONG (Vakum total, setara negara ekonomi kecil di ASEAN).
    Kegagalan Utama: Pembatalan akuisisi F/A-18 Hornet Kuwait sebanyak 4 kali.
    -
    Metodologi Pembiayaan "Non-Tunai"
    Karena krisis likuiditas, pengadaan alutsista beralih ke skema:
    Leasing (Sewa): Digunakan untuk 32+ item (Helikopter Blackhawk, AW139, simulator).
    Barter Komoditas: Penggunaan CPO (Minyak Sawit) untuk FA-50 (Korsel) dan PT-91M (Polandia).
    Hutang G2G/Kredit Ekspor: Pinjaman jangka panjang dari Korea Selatan (KEXIM), China (Eximbank), dan Turki untuk proyek LMS.
    -
    Eskalasi Utang & Liabilitas (2010–2026)
    Tren kenaikan beban finansial nasional:
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar (Awal pertumbuhan).
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun (Lonjakan akibat pengungkapan utang 1MDB & PPP).
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun (Warisan utang yang dikonfirmasi PM Anwar Ibrahim).
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun (Proyeksi Tinjauan Fiskal).
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun (Target manajemen utang tertinggi).
    -
    Indikator Krisis Ekonomi & Fiskal
    Spiral Debt-Pay-Debt: 58% pinjaman baru hanya untuk membayar cicilan/bunga utang lama.
    Debt-to-GDP Ratio: Mendekati 97% dalam skenario stres (jika jaminan pemerintah/kontinjensi terealisasi).
    Household Debt: Mencapai 85,8% dari GDP (Tertinggi di ASEAN).
    Tekanan AS (2026): Ancaman Section 301 (Tarif 10-25%) dan IEEPA (Pemblokiran transaksi) oleh USTR.
    -
    Penurunan Daya Gentar & Reputasi
    Militer: Peringkat 42 GFP (Ke-7 di ASEAN), resmi berada di bawah Filipina.
    Manajemen Aset: Skandal proyek LCS mangkrak, hilangnya 48 pesawat Skyhawk, dan 2 mesin jet tempur.
    Administrasi & Olahraga: Sanksi AFC/CAS terkait pemain naturalisasi ilegal, kalah WO 0-3, dan gagal lolos ke Piala Asia 2027 (digantikan Vietnam).
    Kritik Internal: Narasi "Melayu Malas/Miskin" (Mahathir) dan korupsi proyek banjir (Anwar Ibrahim) sebagai cerminan kegagalan sistemik.

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. LCA : MAHAL346F VERSUS FA50MURAH
      -
      HARGA PER UNIT
      FA-50M (Korsel): USD 50,5 juta/unit.
      M-346 F Block 20 (Italia): USD 145 juta/unit (1 unit = 3 unit FA-50M).
      Rafale F4 (Prancis): USD 192,8 juta/unit (1 unit = 4 unit FA-50M).
      -
      HARGA PESAWAT FA-50 FIGHTING EAGLE =
      1. Polandia: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit GF (±US$58 juta/unit) + US$2,3 miliar untuk 36 unit FA-50PL (±US$64 juta/unit).
      2. Filipina: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit (±US$58 juta/unit).
      3. MALAYSEWA : US$920 juta untuk 18 unit (±US$51 juta/unit).
      -
      10 LCA + 8 LIFT
      Sumber Kontrak FA-50M Malaysia
      Global: Janes, Aviacionline, Global Defense Corp, K-Defense News.
      Lokal: Malaysian Defence, KAI, Yonhap.
      -
      7 F18 USANG
      Sumber Kecelakaan F/A-18D Hornet (21 Ags 2025)
      Media: The Star, NST, FMT, The Edge, Detiknews, Kompas.
      Resmi: TUDM, Bernama/RTM, Kepolisian Pahang, ASN Wikibase.
      --------------------------------
      πŸ“Œ 1. MALAYSEWA Defense Budget in Absolute Terms
      Over the past decade (2015–2025), MALAYSEWA defense allocation has hovered around:
      RM15–19 billion annually (≈ USD 3.2–4.0 billion).
      2024 Budget: ~RM19.7 billion (~USD 4.2B).
      2025: projected to stay roughly flat, given limited fiscal space and high national debt.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 2. Why This is Small in Absolute Terms
      While 1% of GDP looks modest, the total envelope in ringgit is also small compared to regional peers:
      Country (2024 est.) Defense Budget (USD) Population Notes
      Singapore ~USD12.5B 6M Spends 3–4% GDP; much higher per capita.
      Indonesia ~USD9.5B 280M 1–1.2% GDP, but larger economy gives bigger envelope.
      Thailand ~USD7B 70M 1.2% GDP.
      Philippines ~USD5.3B 115M Rising due to South China Sea focus.
      MALAYSEWA ~USD4.0B 34M ~0.9–1% GDP, lowest absolute spend among major ASEAN states.
      πŸ‘‰ MALAYSEWA absolute spending is the lowest among middle-sized ASEAN militaries, despite having major maritime security needs in the South China Sea.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 3. Effect of a Small Absolute Budget
      Even if % of GDP rises slightly, the absolute ringgit amount remains too small to:
      a. Fund Modern Procurement
      Fighter jets, frigates, and submarines are multi-billion RM projects.
      Example: 6 LCS Gowind frigates → RM9 billion+ (but still incomplete).
      With only RM19B annual budget, one major program can consume the entire procurement budget for years.
      b. Support Operations & Maintenance (O&M)
      Fuel, spare parts, training, logistics are expensive.
      A small total envelope means O&M is constantly underfunded → low readiness.
      c. Currency Weakness Effect
      Most modern weapons are priced in USD or EUR.
      Ringgit depreciation (RM4.7–4.8 per USD in 2025) shrinks buying power even further.
      What looks like RM19B is really only USD 4B, compared to Singapore’s USD 12B.
      d. Crowding Out by Salaries
      Out of RM19B defense budget:
      ~70% goes to salaries, pensions, allowances.
      Only ~20–25% available for development & procurement.
      In absolute terms: less than RM4–5B/year for modernization.

      Hapus
  4. MALONYET = GOVT DEBT 70,5% HOUSEHOLD 84,3% TO GDP = NOT PAID FFBNP
    REVENUE: RM334.1 BILLION
    EXPENDITURE: RM470 BILLION
    SUBSIDY BURDEN: 23.9%
    BORROWING TO REPAY DEBT: RM470 – RM334.1 = DEFICIT OF RM135.9
    ------------------------------
    NOT PAID FFBNP = NO SHOPPING BUT LEASING
    NOT PAID FFBNP = NO SHOPPING BUT LEASING
    ------------------------------
    GOVERNMENT REVENUE =
    Ranges from RM334.1 Billion to RM343.1 Billion (75.8% from taxes and 24.2% non-tax/Petronas).
    -
    TOTAL EXPENDITURE =
    Reaches RM419.2 Billion to RM470 Billion.
    -
    BUDGET ALLOCATION =
    RM338.2 Billion is spent on operations (salaries, pensions, subsidies) and only RM81 Billion for infrastructure development.
    -
    MAIN REASONS FOR BORROWING =
    REVENUE COMPLETELY DEPLETED:
    Pure operating costs (RM338.2 Billion) directly consume nearly 100% of all incoming government revenue.
    -
    CHRONIC BUDGET DEFICIT:
    The massive gap between revenue and total spending creates a deficit hole of 3.5% to 3.6% of GDP.
    -
    CHRONIC BUDGET DEFICIT:
    The wide gulf between total revenue (~RM343 billion) and total expenditure (~RM419–RM470 billion) creates a budget deficit ranging from 3.5% to 3.6% of the country's GDP. The only way for the MALAYSEWA government to plug this tens-of-billions-of-ringgit funding gap is by ISSUING NEW GOVERNMENT BONDS.
    --------------------------------------------
    MALAYSEWA DEBT DATA 2026
    Government Debt: RM 1.79 trillion (Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 70.5% - Statutory Limit: 65%)
    Household Debt: RM 1.65 trillion (Household Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 84.3% - Statutory Limit: 65%)
    MALAYSEWA Population 2026: 36,385,115 people
    -
    DEBT PER CAPITA CALCULATION FOR MALAYSEWA 2026
    Government Debt: RM 1,790,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 49,196
    Household Debt: RM 1,650,000,000,000 / 36,385,115 = RM 45,348
    ➡️ TOTAL CUMULATIVE BURDEN PER CITIZEN: RM 49,196 + RM 45,348 = RM 94,544
    ---------------------------------
    Analisa Fiskal: "Spiral Debt-Servicing"
    MALAYSEWA terjebak dalam siklus "Gali Lubang Tutup Lubang" yang kronis:
    Siklus Utang: Proyeksi 2025–2026 menunjukkan 58% pinjaman baru hanya digunakan untuk membayar bunga dan pokok utang lama.
    Ledakan Utang: Dari RM 407,1 Miliar (2010) melonjak ke RM 1,79 Triliun (2026).
    Beban Rakyat: Utang rumah tangga mencapai 84,3% dari PDB, dengan fakta menyedihkan bahwa 84% masyarakat tidak memiliki tabungan setiap bulannya.
    -
    Degradasi Militer & Reputasi (GFP 2026)
    Peringkat GFP: Merosot ke posisi 42 dunia (Peringkat ke-7 di ASEAN), secara resmi disalip oleh Filipina (Peringkat 41).
    Aset Karatan & Hilang: Skandal mangkraknya proyek LCS & OPV, ditambah catatan hilangnya 48 pesawat Skyhawk serta 2 mesin jet tempur dari gudang negara.
    Status Armada: Mayoritas aset utama berstatus Grounded (MiG-29, MB339CM, Nuri, Lynx) atau beroperasi dengan keterbatasan suku cadang (Tank mogok/berasap).
    -
    Krisis Administrasi & Tekanan Global
    Pembekuan Total: PM Anwar Ibrahim menginstruksikan Procurement Freeze 2026 (pembekuan pengadaan) guna menghentikan kebocoran anggaran akibat korupsi proyek.
    Sanksi Internasional: Tekanan AS melalui Section 301 (tarif 10-25%) dan ancaman IEEPA mempersempit ruang gerak fiskal negara.
    Reputasi Regional: Kekalahan WO 0-3 (sanksi AFC/CAS) dan kegagalan lolos ke Piala Asia 2027 mencerminkan keruntuhan sistemik di level administrasi nasional.
    -
    Perbandingan Kontras: Indonesia (The Giant)
    Status SIPRI: Memiliki lembar belanja penuh (Rafale F4, KAAN, PPA, A400M, Rudal Khan).
    Ketahanan: Ekonomi Indonesia 4,24x lebih besar secara PDB PPP dengan rasio utang pemerintah yang jauh lebih sehat (40% vs 69%).

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. LCA : MAHAL346F VERSUS FA50MURAH
      -
      HARGA PER UNIT
      FA-50M (Korsel): USD 50,5 juta/unit.
      M-346 F Block 20 (Italia): USD 145 juta/unit (1 unit = 3 unit FA-50M).
      Rafale F4 (Prancis): USD 192,8 juta/unit (1 unit = 4 unit FA-50M).
      -
      HARGA PESAWAT FA-50 FIGHTING EAGLE =
      1. Polandia: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit GF (±US$58 juta/unit) + US$2,3 miliar untuk 36 unit FA-50PL (±US$64 juta/unit).
      2. Filipina: US$700 juta untuk 12 unit (±US$58 juta/unit).
      3. MALAYSEWA : US$920 juta untuk 18 unit (±US$51 juta/unit).
      -
      10 LCA + 8 LIFT
      Sumber Kontrak FA-50M Malaysia
      Global: Janes, Aviacionline, Global Defense Corp, K-Defense News.
      Lokal: Malaysian Defence, KAI, Yonhap.
      -
      7 F18 USANG
      Sumber Kecelakaan F/A-18D Hornet (21 Ags 2025)
      Media: The Star, NST, FMT, The Edge, Detiknews, Kompas.
      Resmi: TUDM, Bernama/RTM, Kepolisian Pahang, ASN Wikibase.
      --------------------------------
      πŸ“Œ 1. Structural Causes of Weak Modernization
      Small overall defense budget
      Around RM18–20B annually (≈ USD 3.5–4B), much lower than neighbors.
      Most of it goes to salaries & pensions → modernization share <10%.
      No Multi-Year Planning
      Procurement is done on a year-by-year basis, so long projects stall if next year’s budget is cut.
      Example: LCS Gowind frigates stuck for a decade because funds were not consistently released.
      Currency Weakness
      Weapons priced in USD/EUR, while ringgit has depreciated.
      RM19B sounds large, but only USD 4B in real purchasing power.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 2. Key Military Branch Problems
      ✈️ Air Force (RMAF)
      MiG-29 retired (2015) → never replaced, leaving capability gap.
      Su-30MKM → advanced but expensive to maintain, low flying hours.
      F/A-18D Hornet → old fleet, insufficient numbers.
      MRCA program (new multirole fighter) → repeatedly delayed since 2007 due to lack of funds.
      MALE UAV program → still limited, while neighbors already deploy combat drones.
      πŸ‘‰ Result: RMAF today has fewer fighters in service than 20 years ago.
      ________________________________________
      🚒 Navy (RMN)
      Gowind LCS frigate program (RM9B) → delayed over 10 years, still undelivered (as of 2025).
      Patrol fleet → many ships >30 years old, suffering from low readiness.
      Submarines (ScorpΓ¨ne) → only 2 units, high maintenance costs limit patrol days.
      LMS Batch 1 → Chinese-built, limited combat capability.
      LMS Batch 2 → delayed due to funding debates.
      πŸ‘‰ Result: RMN faces critical shortfall in surface combatants for South China Sea patrols.
      ________________________________________
      πŸͺ– Army (TDM)
      Mechanization → limited. AV8 Gempita produced locally, but expensive → numbers restricted.
      Air defense → virtually nonexistent, only MANPADS.
      Artillery → outdated, limited range compared to regional peers.
      Helicopters & transport → too few, most missions still rely on aging Nuri replacements (EC725).
      πŸ‘‰ Result: Army still manpower-heavy, low-tech, designed for counterinsurgency not modern warfare.
      ________________________________________
      πŸ“Œ 3. Consequences of Weak Modernization
      Capability Gaps Grow
      Air defense, fighters, frigates, and UAVs → all behind ASEAN peers.
      Singapore buying F-35s, Indonesia adding Rafale & submarines, Philippines modernizing with U.S./Japan help.
      Prestige Projects Without Sustainment
      MALAYSEWA sometimes buys “showpiece” assets (ScorpΓ¨ne, Su-30MKM) but can’t afford to keep them fully operational.
      Dependence on Foreign Partners
      Relies on FPDA (UK, Australia, Singapore, NZ) to cover gaps in defense.
      Reluctant to invest in self-reliance due to cost.
      Readiness vs Numbers Mismatch
      On paper, MALAYSEWA has frigates, fighters, submarines.
      In reality, many are grounded, under maintenance, or underutilized due to low O&M budgets.

      Hapus
  5. BUKTI HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    BUKTI PRANK 🦧GORILA ....
    -
    KLAIM SHOPPING CASH = 2018-2026 .....
    -
    HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    -
    Daftar tren "Hutang Bayar Hutang" MALAYSEWA dari tahun 2018 hingga proyeksi 2025 berdasarkan data Kementerian Kewangan MALAYSEWA (MOF) dan Jabatan Audit Negara:
    -
    2018: FASE "OPEN DONASI"
    Pemerintah meluncurkan Tabung Harapan MALAYSEWA untuk mengumpulkan sumbangan rakyat guna membantu membayar utang negara yang menembus angka RM1 triliun (80% dari PDB).
    -
    2019: 59% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    Laporan Ketua Audit Negara mengungkapkan bahwa 59% dari pinjaman baru digunakan hanya untuk melunasi utang yang sudah ada (gali lubang tutup lubang).
    -
    2020: 60% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    Ketergantungan meningkat; hampir 60% pinjaman baru dialokasikan untuk membayar utang lama, memicu kekhawatiran karena anggaran pembangunan semakin terhimpit.
    -
    2021: 50,4% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    Dari total pinjaman baru sebesar RM194,55 miliar, sebanyak RM98,05 miliar digunakan untuk pembayaran kembali prinsipal utang yang telah matang.
    -
    2022: 52,4% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    Realisasi pembayaran prinsipal mencapai RM113,7 miliar. Total pinjaman meningkat 11,6% dibandingkan tahun sebelumnya akibat pemulihan pascapandemi.
    -
    2023: 64,3% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    Persentase tertinggi dalam periode ini. Dari total pinjaman kasar RM226,6 miliar, sebesar RM145,8 miliar lari ke pembayaran utang lama.
    -
    2024: 58,9% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    Pemerintah mulai melakukan konsolidasi. Pinjaman digunakan untuk melunasi utang matang sebesar RM121,3 miliar dari total pinjaman RM206 miliar.
    -
    2025: 58% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    Berdasarkan Tinjauan Fiskal 2025, pemerintah memproyeksikan pinjaman kasar sebesar RM184 miliar, di mana RM106,8 miliar disiapkan untuk membayar prinsipal utang matang.
    -
    2026 = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    Dokumen Resmi Pemerintah (Kementerian Kewangan MALAYSEWA - MOF)
    Data utama berasal dari laporan tahunan yang diterbitkan bersamaan dengan pembentangan anggaran negara:
    Laporan Tinjauan Fiskal 2025 & 2026: Memuat angka proyeksi pinjaman kasar (gross borrowing) dan alokasi pembayaran kembali prinsipal utang yang matang.
    ________________________________________
    DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : DEBT PAY DEBT
    DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : OVERLIMIT DEBT
    2029 = 69,54% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2028 = 69,34% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2027 = 68,8% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2026 = 68,17% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2025 = 68,07% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2024 = 68,38% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2023 = 69,76% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2022 = 65,5% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2021 = 69,16% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    2020 = 67,69% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
    ________________________________________
    HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYSEWA 2010–2026
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
    ________________________________________
    Ringkasan Sumber Berita & Referensi:
    Bloomberg & Reuters (2018–2019): Laporan mengenai total utang yang melampaui RM 1 triliun setelah memasukkan komitmen jaminan dan liabilitas 1MDB.
    -
    CNA & The Star (2020): Analisis kenaikan plafon utang untuk pendanaan Kumpulan Wang COVID-19 (KWC).
    -
    The Edge MALAYSEWA (2021–2022): Catatan akumulasi utang federal yang mencapai ambang batas baru pasca-pandemi.
    -
    MOF Portal & Bernama (2023–2024): Pernyataan PM Anwar Ibrahim mengenai beban utang RM 1,5 triliun untuk reformasi fiskal.
    -
    Kementerian Kewangan (MOF) MALAYSEWA (2025–2026): Data proyeksi melalui dokumen Belanjawan 2026 dan strategi fiskal jangka menengah

    BalasHapus
  6. Eittttt nambah lagiiiii....skalian SPH biar tambah NGAMUKπŸ”₯ warganyet kl haha!😀🀣🍌

    BalasHapus
  7. Garibaldi FREE TRANSFER JADIII
    Sebentar lagi kirim yaa haha!πŸ‘ŒπŸ€—πŸ˜Ž

    SALAM buat negri🎰kasino genting BATAL❌️ DAPAT NSM dari NORWAY, MeWeK😭haha!πŸ˜πŸ˜‹πŸ˜­

    BalasHapus
  8. Latgab tahun ini terasa beda
    Semakin Moderen dengan Aset BARUW NAN PREMIUM= PPA & RAFALE haha!πŸ€‘πŸ‘πŸ₯³

    peperangan Dron AKM & USV serta KSOT semua made in dalam negeri🦾

    bisa produksi UNLIMITED..OKE GASπŸ”₯ KEUN haha!πŸ¦ΎπŸ˜ŽπŸš€

    apalagi taon depan, bole tembak Salvo MLRS VAMPIR, ASTROS, ITBM KHAN dari atas dek aset Baruw Kapal Induk Garibaldi FREE haha!πŸ€—πŸš€πŸ˜‰
    tak lupa serbuan dron2 UCAV

    kahsiyan, kl mana nyampe...
    beda level, beda kasta haha!πŸ˜‹πŸ˜‹πŸŒ

    ⬇️✅️⬇️✅️
    https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbqSKnKJ9oA/

    BalasHapus
  9. MANAKAL INI LEBIH PARAH DAN MEMALUKAN PAKE ACARA TIPU-TIPU SEGALA BUAT BARANG HARAM SESUAI HOBBY MALAYDESH, MUNGKIN AIRPORTNYA CANGGIH TERNYATA RONGSOK DAN BERUKNYA IQ BOTOL SEMUA πŸ”₯πŸ”₯🀣🀣🀣🀣

    https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20260803095657-12-1387888/pilot-malaysia-kurir-sabu-terbang-pakai-narkoba-bawa-urine-cadangan

    BalasHapus