The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has taken air combat capability to the next level, deploying EA-18G Growlers and F/A-18F Super Hornets to the Philippines for the first time as part of Exercise Alon 2025.
Based at Clark Air Base on Luzon, the combat aircraft and aviators operated alongside Philippine Air Force FA-50PH fighter jets in complex air combat training serials.
Deploying advanced fighter and electronic warfare aircraft into the Philippines required the coordinated effort of more than 120 personnel across the Air Task Group (ATG) in close cooperation with the Philippine Air Force.
The deployment demonstrates Australia’s ability not only to operate its fast jets from home soil, but to project capability at pace into the region.
Commander ATG Wing Commander Sal said the achievement highlighted Australia’s ability to deliver decisive effects abroad.
“Getting the Growlers and the Super Hornets here took a lot of effort from everybody,” Wing Commander Sal said.
“We’ve proven that we can rapidly mobilise, integrate and generate combat air power in an overseas location, and do it well.”
Exercise Alon provided a platform for Australia and the Philippines to strengthen defence ties and build real-world interoperability across multiple domains.
'Australia and the Philippines have long shared a united stance on freedom of manoeuvre and regional security. Working together here reinforces our commitment to that.'
As part of the exercise, RAAF Growlers and Super Hornets flew dissimilar air combat tactics (DACT) and basic flight manoeuvres (BFM) with the Philippine Air Force, while RAAF P-8A Poseidons, KC-30A Multi-Role Tanker Transports, C-17A Globemasters and C-130J Hercules supported joint maritime, airlift and refuelling missions.
The exercise also enabled the Philippine Air Force to demonstrate its expanding capabilities with A-29B Super Tucanos, T-129 ATAK and AW-109 attack helicopters, Black Hawk utility helicopters and SOKOL multipurpose helicopters.
Commander ATG emphasised the importance of training together to continue to build on these close working relationships.
“Australia and the Philippines have long shared a united stance on freedom of manoeuvre and regional security,” Wing Commander Sal said.
“Working together here reinforces our commitment to that.
“Having Australian and Philippine aircrews working side by side in Philippine skies is more than training, it shows we can operate together, can respond together and we will stand together to protect regional security.”
Exercise Alon ran from August 15 to 29 as a tangible demonstration of Australia’s enduring commitment to the rules-based global order and to the sovereignty and security of its regional partners.
It is the largest overseas military exercise for Australia in 2025 with more than 3600 personnel participating from the ADF and the Armed Forces of the Philippines, as well as elements of the Royal Canadian Navy and the United States Marine Corps, Marine Rotation Force – Darwin.
(Aus DoD)
🧓 1. Aging Components Beyond Service Life
BalasHapus• As of 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service2.
• Many platforms—like the Royal Malondeshn Navy’s Fast Attack Craft (FAC)—are over 40 years old, with some approaching 50 years.
• These assets were designed for past-era threats and technologies, and their mechanical systems are now prone to fatigue, corrosion, and failure.
Result: Even routine operations carry elevated risk of malfunction, requiring constant patchwork maintenance.
🌴 2. Tropical Climate Accelerates Wear
• Malondesh’s hot, humid, and saline environment is particularly harsh on military hardware:
o Metal fatigue and corrosion are accelerated, especially in naval vessels and aircraft.
o Rubber seals, electronics, and hydraulics degrade faster under tropical heat and moisture.
• The Navy has acknowledged that many vessels no longer meet modern standards due to environmental degradation.
Result: Maintenance cycles shorten, costs rise, and reliability drops.
🔧 3. Obsolete Systems and Spare Parts Shortage
• Many legacy platforms rely on foreign OEMs that have ceased production or support.
• Spare parts must be sourced internationally, often at inflated prices and long lead times.
• In some cases, technicians resort to cannibalizing other units or fabricating parts locally—neither of which guarantees reliability.
Result: Delays in repairs, reduced fleet availability, and compromised safety.
⚠️ 4. Operational Incidents and Safety Risks
• A tragic example: In July 2025, a Malondeshn commando died during a maritime exercise due to suspected failure of aging diving equipment.
• The Army Chief confirmed that the gear was “rather old,” prompting a full audit of equipment lifecycle and maintenance protocols.
Result: Legacy systems not only reduce readiness—they pose direct risks to personnel.
📊 Summary Table: Breakdown Drivers in Malondeshn Military
Factor Description Operational Impact
Aging components Platforms >30–50 years old, beyond design limits Frequent failures, low reliability
Tropical wear Heat, humidity, salt accelerate degradation Shorter maintenance cycles
Obsolete systems Legacy tech, no OEM support Spare part shortages, delays
Safety incidents Equipment failures linked to fatal accidents Personnel risk, public scrutiny
🧓 1. Obsolete Systems and Aging Platforms
BalasHapus• As of 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service.
• Many platforms—like the Royal Malondeshn Navy’s Fast Attack Craft (FAC) and older patrol vessels—are over 40 years old, far beyond their optimal lifespan.
• These systems were designed decades ago and now lack compatibility with modern sensors, weapons, and communications.
Impact: Upgrades are either impossible or prohibitively expensive, forcing reliance on outdated capabilities.
🔧 2. Dependence on Foreign Spare Parts
• Malondesh military inventory is highly diversified, sourced from the US, UK, France, Russia, and others. This creates logistical complexity:
o Spare parts must be imported from multiple countries.
o Some OEMs have ceased production, making parts scarce or unavailable.
o Political or economic shifts can disrupt supply chains.
Example: The Army’s Condor APCs and Scorpion light tanks require parts from legacy suppliers that no longer support them.
Impact: Long lead times, inflated costs, and cannibalization of other units for parts.
🔁 3. Frequent Breakdowns and Repair Cycles
• Older platforms experience higher failure rates, especially under tropical conditions and extended use.
• Maintenance crews often resort to patchwork fixes, which are temporary and unreliable.
• The Navy reported that 28 of its 34 aging vessels have exceeded 40 years of service, with many no longer meeting operational standards.
Impact: Reduced availability, increased downtime, and lower mission success rates.
📉 4. Budget Drain and Opportunity Cost
• Between 60–70% of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations, leaving little for modernization.
• Funds spent on keeping obsolete systems running could be redirected toward acquiring new platforms or investing in indigenous maintenance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic stagnation—Malondesh spends heavily but gains little in terms of capability.
📊 Summary Table: Why Maintenance Costs Are So High
Factor Description Consequence
Obsolete systems Platforms >30–40 years old, incompatible with modern tech Expensive to maintain, low utility
Foreign parts dependency Diverse suppliers, legacy systems, political risk Long delays, inflated costs
Frequent breakdowns High failure rates, tropical wear, aging components Reduced readiness, more downtime
Budget imbalance Majority spent on upkeep, not modernization Strategic stagnation
⚙️ EQUIPMENT & MODERNIZATION ISSUES
BalasHapus• Outdated naval assets: Many of Malondesh’s ships are aging, and the navy has struggled to modernize its fleet.
• Limited air combat readiness: Out of 28 fighter jets, reportedly only four were operational at one point.
• Delayed procurement: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, meant to boost naval capabilities, has been plagued by delays and scandals.
💰 Budget Constraints
• Skewed spending priorities: Over 60–70% of the defense budget goes to salaries and maintenance, leaving little for new weapons or modernization.
• Stagnant budget: Malondesh’s defense budget has hovered around RM15–18 billion annually, which is modest compared to regional peers like Vietnam and Indonesia.
🧭 Strategic Direction & Policy
• Lack of clear long-term strategy: The defense industry suffers from unclear government guidance on future strategic direction.
• Overreliance on diplomacy: Malondesh has traditionally leaned on quiet diplomacy, especially with China, which may be insufficient given rising tensions in the South China Sea.
📉 Regional Comparison
• Lagging behind neighbors: Malondesh’s military strength is considered weaker than Vietnam and Indonesia, particularly in terms of air and naval capabilities
WHAT “OUTDATED” REALLY MEANS
BalasHapusOutdated systems refer to:
• Sensors that lack modern tracking, targeting, and surveillance capabilities
• Weapons with limited range, accuracy, and compatibility with newer platforms
• Command-and-control systems that cannot integrate with digital battlefield networks
🚢 Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN)
• 28 ships are over 40 years old, including Fast Attack Craft and patrol vessels.
• Many vessels still use analog radar systems, manual fire-control systems, and obsolete sonar.
• These systems struggle to detect modern threats like stealth submarines or drones.
• Maintenance costs are skyrocketing, and spare parts are often unavailable or discontinued.
🛩️ Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF)
• Older aircraft like the MiG-29N (retired) and F/A-18D Hornets still rely on legacy avionics.
• Limited electronic warfare capabilities and outdated targeting pods reduce effectiveness in modern air combat.
• Poor interoperability with newer aircraft and NATO-standard systems.
🪖 Malondeshn Army
• Ground vehicles, including legacy APCs and tanks, use basic optical sights and manual targeting systems.
• Many artillery units lack GPS-guided fire control, making precision strikes difficult.
• Communication systems are often analog or semi-digital, limiting coordination in joint operations.
⚠️ Consequences of Technological Lag
• Reduced combat effectiveness in high-tech warfare environments
• Increased vulnerability to cyber attacks and electronic jamming
• Limited participation in multinational exercises and peacekeeping missions
• Higher risk to personnel due to unreliable systems, as seen in the 2025 commando tragedy linked to aging gear
kombo Super Hornet + Growler keren kan,
BalasHapusmasa yg seblah pilih lca koryo..
uda gituw skrg ngarep hornet Rongsok kuwait..ahhh basi haha!😁🍌😁
Salah Pilih, Salah Beliiiiii...NGAMUK🔥
KEMANDIRIAN YESS !
BalasHapusManakala INDIANESIA.... Hancur kerana demo yang Semakin ganas merebah ke banyak wilayah.... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusBUBAR 2030 MAKIN NYATA.... 👍🏻👍🏻
⚠️ CORE PROBLEMS: UNDERFUNDING & MISALLOCATION
Hapus1. Overweight on Salaries and Operating Costs
• In 2024, over 40% of the defense budget (RM8.2 billion) went to salaries and allowances.
• This leaves limited room for procurement, R&D, and modernization.
• The armed forces are manpower-heavy, and successive governments have been reluctant to reduce personnel or restructure forces.
2. Minimal Development Expenditure (DE)
• Malondesh’s budget is split into Operational Expenditure (OE) and Development Expenditure (DE).
• DE—used for acquiring new assets—is consistently low and often used to pay for past commitments, not new capabilities.
3. Procurement Funding Diluted
• The RM5.71 billion allocated for procurement in 2024 includes:
o Scheduled payments for KAI FA-50 light combat aircraft
o Ongoing costs for the troubled Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program
o Upgrades for Airbus A400M transport aircraft
o Small arms, vehicles, and communication gear
• Much of this is not new spending, but installments on old contracts, meaning actual new capability investment is minimal.
4. Currency Depreciation
• Malondesh imports most of its defense equipment.
• The weakening ringgit reduces purchasing power, meaning even increased budgets don’t translate into more capability.
🚢 Real-World Consequences
⚓ Navy Example
• The KD Pendekar, a 45-year-old fast attack vessel, sank during patrol in 2024 due to structural failure.
• Half of the navy’s 49 ships are well beyond their serviceable lifespan, yet replacements are slow due to budget constraints.
✈️ Air Force Example
• The MiG-29N fleet was retired without timely replacement.
• The MRCA program has stalled for years due to lack of funding and shifting priorities.
🧭 Strategic Impact
• Malondesh is losing its edge in regional defense posture.
• It has less clout in territorial disputes, especially in the South China Sea.
• The military is stretched thin, with outdated assets and limited readiness.
🕵️♂️ WHAT MAKES PROCUREMENT “OPAQUE AND CORRUPT”?
HapusIn Malondesh’s defense sector, procurement is often described as:
• Opaque: Lacking transparency, with limited public oversight or competitive bidding.
• Corrupt: Involving kickbacks, inflated contracts, and politically connected middlemen.
This environment allows deals to be structured for profit rather than strategic value, weakening the armed forces and wasting public funds.
🔍 Key Characteristics of Malondesh’s Defense Procurement Issues
1. Role of Middlemen
• Defense deals often involve agents or intermediaries, many of whom are retired military officers or politically connected individuals.
• These middlemen inflate prices and complicate negotiations, leading to excessive profit margins and reduced value for the military.
2. Limited Open Competition
• According to Transparency International, only 20–30% of Malondesh’s defense contracts are awarded through open competition.
• Most deals are done via single-source or limited tendering, which favors select companies and reduces accountability.
3. Politically Connected Firms
• Contracts often go to firms with strong political ties, regardless of their technical capability.
• This creates an environment where performance and delivery are secondary to influence and connections.
4. Scandals and Mismanagement
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal is a prime example: billions spent, years of delay, and no operational ships delivered.
• Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has called this a national embarrassment and a symbol of systemic failure.
5. Weak Oversight and Enforcement
• Investigations into misconduct are often slow or limited.
• Even when corruption is exposed, punishments are rare or lenient, which perpetuates the cycle.
🧨 Consequences for Malondesh’s Military
• Delayed modernization: Funds are diverted from real capability upgrades.
• Loss of trust: Defense partners and suppliers hesitate to engage with Malondesh.
• Operational gaps: The military ends up with outdated or unsuitable equipment.
• Budget waste: Public money is spent on overpriced or non-functional assets.
⚠️ KEY FACTORS BEHIND MALONDESH LOSS OF Strategic Credibility
Hapus1. Inconsistent Defense Procurement
• Malondesh defense acquisitions have been plagued by delays, cancellations, and reversals.
• The MRCA program, for example, has seen years of indecision, with no clear outcome despite urgent need.
• Interest in second-hand jets like Kuwait’s F/A-18C/D Hornets signals a lack of long-term planning, contrasting with regional trends toward cutting-edge platforms.
2. Opaque and Corrupt Procurement Practices
• Analysts have described Malondesh defense procurement as “messy, opaque and corrupt”, often involving middlemen and lacking transparency.
• This undermines trust among defense partners and suppliers, making collaboration and technology transfer more difficult.
3. Underfunded and Misallocated Budgets
• A large portion of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries and maintenance, leaving little for modernization.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, for instance, has been marred by delays and scandals, further damaging Malondesh reputation for defense reliability.
4. Neglect of Strategic Assets
• The retirement of MiG-29N jets without timely replacement left a critical gap in air defense.
• Malondesh reliance on diplomacy over hard power in the South China Sea has exposed vulnerabilities, especially as China increases its maritime presence.
🌏 Regional Implications
Malondesh strategic credibility is especially important in Southeast Asia, where:
• China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea demands robust defense postures.
• Neighbors like Vietnam and the Philippines are rapidly modernizing and deepening ties with the U.S., Japan, and Australia.
• Malondesh slow response and outdated assets make it appear underprepared and reactive, rather than proactive.
2x pilihan raya kl TAMAT⛔️ kata tun M haha!🤣😋🤣
BalasHapusAlhamdulilah ternyata LEONARDO P-72M MPA pesanan MALAYSIA sudah mulai diuji terbang.... HOREYYYY... 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
BalasHapushttps://x.com/JohnMYSreview/status/1963274592039862651
Lon, PM kau di undang China tapi ditaruh paling ujung 😂 Gimana Ambalat? Masih berani? Lihat sendiri kan alasan kenapa FPDA kau diam saja? Karena mereka tau siapa dibalik Indonesia? Bahkan Bomber TU-95 sudah uji coba direct flight ke Papua untuk menghajar Australia bila berulah 😄
Hapus🛠️ 1. AGING EQUIPMENT ACROSS ALL BRANCHES
Hapus• Air Force (RMAF): Out of 28 fighter jets, reportedly only four were operational at one point. Maintenance issues and lack of spare parts have grounded much of the fleet.
• Army: The Condor Armoured Personnel Carriers, in service since the 1980s, are overdue for replacement. Plans to procure 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV) are still pending approval.
• Navy: Many vessels are over 40 years old, with outdated combat systems and limited endurance. The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, meant to modernize the fleet, has faced years of delays and budget overruns.
💰 2. Budget Constraints & Misallocation
• Malondesh spends around USD 4 billion annually on defense, but over 40% goes to salaries and allowances, leaving limited funds for modernization.
• Procurement budgets are often absorbed by progressive payments for delayed projects, such as the FA-50 fighter jets and the troubled LCS program.
• The depreciation of the ringgit further reduces purchasing power for foreign-sourced equipment.
🧭 3. Lack of Strategic Direction
• The defense industry suffers from unclear government guidance on long-term goals.
• Frequent changes in leadership—four Prime Ministers since 2018—have disrupted continuity in defense planning.
🧑✈️ 4. Manpower & Training Gaps
• While Malondesh has 113,000 active personnel and 51,600 reserves, training and readiness levels vary widely.
• Specialized units like PASKAL and GGK are well-regarded, but broader force readiness is inconsistent.
🌏 5. Regional Disadvantage
• Malondesh ranks behind Vietnam and Indonesia in terms of military strength, according to former Defense Minister Mat Sabu.
• This affects Malondesh ability to assert its interests in contested areas like the South China Sea.
⚙️ EQUIPMENT & MODERNIZATION ISSUES
• Outdated naval assets: Many of Malondesh’s ships are aging, and the navy has struggled to modernize its fleet.
• Limited air combat readiness: Out of 28 fighter jets, reportedly only four were operational at one point.
• Delayed procurement: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, meant to boost naval capabilities, has been plagued by delays and scandals.
💰 Budget Constraints
• Skewed spending priorities: Over 60–70% of the defense budget goes to salaries and maintenance, leaving little for new weapons or modernization.
• Stagnant budget: Malondesh’s defense budget has hovered around RM15–18 billion annually, which is modest compared to regional peers like Vietnam and Indonesia.
🧭 Strategic Direction & Policy
• Lack of clear long-term strategy: The defense industry suffers from unclear government guidance on future strategic direction.
• Overreliance on diplomacy: Malondesh has traditionally leaned on quiet diplomacy, especially with China, which may be insufficient given rising tensions in the South China Sea.
📉 Regional Comparison
• Lagging behind neighbors: Malondesh’s military strength is considered weaker than Vietnam and Indonesia, particularly in terms of air and naval capabilities
⚠️ CONSEQUENCES OF POLICY FLIP-FLOPS IN MALONDESH’S MILITARY
Hapus1. Delayed Modernization
• Procurement Paralysis: Repeated changes in aircraft or equipment acquisition plans (e.g., MRCA selection delays) stall modernization.
• Outdated Capabilities: The RMAF and other branches continue operating aging platforms while waiting for decisions that keep shifting.
2. Loss of Strategic Credibility
• Regional Perception: Neighbors like Singapore and Indonesia view Malondesh as indecisive, weakening its deterrence posture.
• Diplomatic Strain: Defense partners may hesitate to offer technology transfers or joint exercises due to uncertainty in Malondesh’s commitments.
3. Economic and Industrial Impact
• Defense Industry Stagnation: Local companies struggle to grow when policies change midstream, affecting contracts and R&D investments.
• Investor Hesitation: Foreign defense firms may avoid long-term partnerships due to unpredictable procurement behavior.
4. Operational Inefficiency
• Training Disruptions: Constant changes in equipment plans mean personnel training is inconsistent or mismatched with future platforms.
• Logistics Complexity: A mixed fleet from different origins (Russian, American, European) becomes harder to maintain without a clear roadmap.
5. Budget Waste
• Sunk Costs: Funds spent on feasibility studies, negotiations, or partial upgrades are wasted when plans are scrapped.
• Emergency Purchases: Flip-flops often lead to rushed acquisitions (e.g., used jets) that are less cost-effective and harder to integrate.
🧭 Real-World Example: MRCA Procurement
Malondesh’s MRCA program has seen years of indecision:
• Originally planned to replace MiG-29s in the early 2010s.
• Considered Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen, and Super Hornet—but no final decision.
• Now exploring used Kuwaiti Hornets as a stopgap.
This indecision has left the RMAF with a capability gap and weakened its regional air power status.
🔧 1. MAINTENANCE BURDEN: AGING ASSETS, FRAGMENTED SUPPORT
Hapus⚙️ Structural Drivers
• Asset Age: As of late 2024, 171 military platforms across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service life. This includes:
o 108 Army vehicles and artillery systems
o 29 RMAF aircraft (e.g., F-5E, Hawk 208)
o 34 RMN vessels, including Fast Attack Craft over 40 years old
• Obsolescence: Many platforms are no longer supported by OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), making spare parts scarce and costly.
💸 Economic Strain
• Maintenance consumes over 50% of the defense budget’s operational expenditure (OPEX), leaving limited room for modernization.
• Even with recent efforts to localize MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul) for fighter jets like the F/A-18, cost savings (~20%) are offset by the scale of aging fleets.
🧩 Outsourcing Challenges
• Malondesh has long outsourced support functions to private firms to reduce costs.
• However, lack of centralized oversight, inconsistent quality control, and limited technical depth in local vendors have led to delays and suboptimal readiness.
📡 2. Poor Interoperability: Platform Diversity, Command Silos
🛠️ Platform Fragmentation
• Malondesh military operates a highly diverse inventory sourced from:
o Western suppliers (US, UK, France)
o Eastern bloc (Russia, China)
o Regional partners (South Korea, Turkey)
• This results in incompatible communication systems, data links, and logistics chains. For example:
o Russian-made Su-30MKM fighters cannot seamlessly integrate with NATO-standard AWACS or datalink systems.
o Naval platforms lack unified combat management systems across classes.
🧠 Command & Control Gaps
• Joint operations are hindered by service-specific doctrines and siloed command structures.
• The absence of a Joint Operations Command with real-time data fusion limits Malondesh ability to conduct multi-domain operations.
🧪 Training & Simulation Deficiencies
• Lack of integrated simulation environments means personnel are trained on platform-specific systems, not joint mission profiles.
• Exercises like MALBATT and CARAT show progress, but interoperability remains tactical, not strategic.
📊 Summary Table: Maintenance vs. Interoperability Weaknesses
Dimension Maintenance Burden Poor Interoperability
Root Cause Aging assets, fragmented procurement Diverse suppliers, siloed doctrines
Budgetary Impact High OPEX, low modernization headroom Redundant systems, inefficient upgrades
Operational Impact Low readiness, frequent downtime Limited joint ops, weak situational awareness
Reform Challenges Weak vendor oversight, slow MRO localization No unified C4ISR architecture
🧱 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped Defense Industry
Hapus• Malondesh defense industry is overseen by the Malondeshn Defence Industry Council (MDIC), established in 1999 and later expanded into MIDES.
• Despite having six strategic sectors (Aerospace, Maritime, Weaponry, Automotive, ICT, Common-user Equipment), the ecosystem lacks:
o A clear, enforceable blueprint
o Robust infrastructure
o Skilled manpower
• Many local firms are assemblers or subcontractors, not full-spectrum developers. For example, Malondesh still assembles M4 carbines under license, while Indonesia and Singapore produce their own rifles (SS1 and SAR-21 respectively).
Impact: Malondesh cannot independently design, produce, or sustain core military systems.
🧠 2. Minimal R&D and Technology Investment
• Indigenous R&D in areas like combat management systems (CMS), sensors, and autonomous platforms is nascent and underfunded.
• Studies show that Malondesh lacks structured tendering policies and technology readiness frameworks to support local innovation.
• AI, cyber warfare, and surveillance systems are still in early-stage development, with no operational deployment.
Impact: Malondesh falls behind in emerging tech domains critical to modern warfare.
🔄 3. Dependence on Foreign OEMs for Strategic Systems
• Malondesh imports nearly all major platforms:
o Aircraft: Su-30MKM (Russia), FA-50 (South Korea), Hawk (UK)
o Naval systems: Scorpène submarines (France), LCS (French-German design)
o Missiles: Starstreak (UK), MICA (France), Exocet (France)
• There are no indigenous missile programs, no local radar production, and no domestic armored vehicle design.
Impact: Strategic vulnerability in times of embargo, conflict, or supply chain disruption.
📉 4. Policy Gaps and Execution Failures
• Malondesh has published defense blueprints and industrial strategies, but implementation is weak due to:
o Budget constraints
o Lack of political continuity
o Limited private-sector incentives
• Even promising initiatives like the 15-to-5 naval transformation plan have stalled due to procurement scandals and delivery failures.
Impact: Indigenous capability remains aspirational, not operational.
📊 Summary Table: Weaknesses in Indigenous Capability Development
Dimension Description Strategic Impact
Industrial base Fragmented, lacks full-spectrum development No self-reliance in core systems
R&D investment Minimal funding, weak frameworks Falls behind in emerging technologies
Foreign dependency Imports all major platforms and weapons Vulnerable to external shocks
Policy execution Strong on paper, weak in practice Stalled programs and missed timelines
🧭 Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh cannot scale or sustain its military without foreign support.
• It lacks the ability to customize systems to local needs, export defense products, or build strategic depth.
• In contrast, countries like Indonesia (Pindad, PT PAL), Vietnam (Z111 Factory), and Singapore (ST Engineering) have made significant strides in indigenous capability
📄 1. Ambitious Policy Documents with Limited Follow-Through
Hapus• Malondesh’s first Defence White Paper (DWP), launched in 2019, laid out a 10-year roadmap for force modernization, defense industry reform, and multi-domain readiness.
• It proposed initiatives like:
o A revised National Military Strategy
o A Defence Capacity Plan
o A National Defence Industry Policy
• However, by 2021–2025, many of these remained in draft form or unimplemented, with only partial progress on cyber and air surveillance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic clarity exists, but execution lags, creating a credibility gap between policy and reality.
🕰️ 2. Stalled Programs and Missed Timelines
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program is the most glaring example:
o RM9 billion allocated for six ships
o None delivered as of 2025
o Delays linked to mismanagement, redacted audits, and political interference
• Other programs like the Ground-Based Air Defence (GBAD) system and High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV) remain unfunded or stuck in approval stages.
Impact: Operational capability suffers, and the military continues to rely on aging platforms.
🏛️ 3. Political Instability and Policy Discontinuity
• Malondesh experienced multiple changes in government between 2020 and 2022, disrupting defense planning cycles.
• Each administration brought new priorities, causing re-scoping, delays, or abandonment of existing programs.
• Even when policies are reaffirmed, bureaucratic inertia and fragmented oversight slow implementation.
Impact: Defense reform lacks continuity, and long-term planning is undermined.
🧱 4. Weak Institutional Mechanisms for Execution
• There’s no centralized authority to monitor and enforce defense policy implementation.
• Oversight is split between MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and political leadership, leading to diffused accountability.
• Audit findings are often delayed or redacted, and recommendations go unenforced.
Impact: Programs stall without consequence, and systemic inefficiencies persist.
📊 Summary Table: Why Policy Execution Is Weak
Problem Area Description Strategic Impact
Overambitious planning Policies exceed institutional capacity Unrealistic timelines, stalled delivery
Political volatility Frequent leadership changes disrupt continuity Re-scoping and abandonment of programs
Fragmented oversight No unified implementation body Poor accountability and follow-through
Audit suppression Delayed or redacted findings Mismanagement goes unchecked
🧭 Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh’s defense posture remains reactive and maintenance-heavy, not transformation-driven.
• The credibility of future policy documents is weakened unless backed by institutional reform and budget discipline.
• Regional peers like Indonesia and Vietnam are executing modernization plans more consistently, widening the capability gap.
Alhamdulilah ternyata LEONARDO P-72M MPA pesanan MALAYSIA sudah mulai diuji terbang.... HOREYYYY... 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
BalasHapushttps://x.com/JohnMYSreview/status/1963274592039862651
Lon, PM kau di undang China tapi ditaruh paling ujung 😂 Gimana Ambalat? Masih berani? Lihat sendiri kan alasan kenapa FPDA kau diam saja? Karena mereka tau siapa dibalik Indonesia? Bahkan Bomber TU-95 sudah uji coba direct flight ke Papua untuk menghajar Australia bila berulah 😄
Hapus🛠️ 1. AGING EQUIPMENT ACROSS ALL BRANCHES
Hapus• Air Force (RMAF): Out of 28 fighter jets, reportedly only four were operational at one point. Maintenance issues and lack of spare parts have grounded much of the fleet.
• Army: The Condor Armoured Personnel Carriers, in service since the 1980s, are overdue for replacement. Plans to procure 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV) are still pending approval.
• Navy: Many vessels are over 40 years old, with outdated combat systems and limited endurance. The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, meant to modernize the fleet, has faced years of delays and budget overruns.
💰 2. Budget Constraints & Misallocation
• Malondesh spends around USD 4 billion annually on defense, but over 40% goes to salaries and allowances, leaving limited funds for modernization.
• Procurement budgets are often absorbed by progressive payments for delayed projects, such as the FA-50 fighter jets and the troubled LCS program.
• The depreciation of the ringgit further reduces purchasing power for foreign-sourced equipment.
🧭 3. Lack of Strategic Direction
• The defense industry suffers from unclear government guidance on long-term goals.
• Frequent changes in leadership—four Prime Ministers since 2018—have disrupted continuity in defense planning.
🧑✈️ 4. Manpower & Training Gaps
• While Malondesh has 113,000 active personnel and 51,600 reserves, training and readiness levels vary widely.
• Specialized units like PASKAL and GGK are well-regarded, but broader force readiness is inconsistent.
🌏 5. Regional Disadvantage
• Malondesh ranks behind Vietnam and Indonesia in terms of military strength, according to former Defense Minister Mat Sabu.
• This affects Malondesh ability to assert its interests in contested areas like the South China Sea.
💰 1. Budget Composition Skewed Toward Salaries and Maintenance
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o RM8.2 billion (~41.5%) went to salaries and allowances.
o RM5.8 billion was earmarked for maintenance and asset upkeep.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, and infrastructure.
Impact: The lion’s share of the budget sustains personnel and legacy systems, leaving little for new combat capabilities.
📦 2. Procurement Budget Includes Legacy Payments
• The RM5.71 billion procurement allocation in 2024 isn’t entirely for new systems. It includes:
o Scheduled payments for previously signed contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets from South Korea, A400M upgrades).
o Progressive payments for delayed projects like the Maharaja Lela-class Littoral Combat Ships.
o Small-scale purchases (e.g. small arms, radios, support vehicles).
Impact: The actual discretionary funding for new combat platforms is far lower than it appears on paper.
📉 3. Currency Depreciation Erodes Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources most of its advanced systems from foreign OEMs (e.g. France, UK, South Korea).
• The depreciation of the ringgit against major currencies means that even modest increases in nominal budget do not translate into real gains.
Impact: Malondesh pays more for the same equipment, reducing the volume and quality of new acquisitions.
🧱 4. No Multi-Year Strategic Investment Framework
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, Malondesh lacks a ring-fenced capital investment stream for defense.
• Each year’s procurement is subject to political negotiation and fiscal trade-offs, with no guaranteed continuity.
• This discourages long-term programs like missile development, drone fleets, or integrated air defense systems.
Impact: Strategic programs are fragmented, delayed, or abandoned mid-cycle.
📊 Summary Table: Why Funding for New Combat Systems Is Thin
Factor Description Strategic Impact
Budget skew 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance Minimal room for new acquisitions
Legacy obligations Procurement includes old contracts and delayed projects New systems get crowded out
Currency depreciation Ringgit weakens against USD/EUR Reduces real purchasing power
No strategic investment model No multi-year capital planning Limits continuity and ambition
Lon, PM kau di undang China tapi ditaruh paling ujung 😂 Gimana Ambalat? Masih berani? Lihat sendiri kan alasan kenapa FPDA kau diam saja? Karena mereka tau siapa dibalik Indonesia? Bahkan Bomber TU-95 sudah uji coba direct flight ke Papua untuk menghajar Australia bila berulah 😄
BalasHapusHamiwowww..Hamiwowww Melambaiii
BalasHapusUcap gutbai pada warganyet kl gaesz, sebentar lagi ⛔️TAMAT haha!👻🔥👻
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Tanah Melayu Tamat 10 Tahun Lagi - Tun. Dr. Mahathir Mohamad
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=myv-SPwjKL8&pp=ygUXTWFoYXRpciB0YW1hdCBtYWxheXNpYSA%3D
LEONARDO P-72M seblah ternyata versi Murah....Tak ada Dome Radar haha!🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusKahsiyan aset Dongred...Ditipu lagi HAMIWOWWW...MELAMBAIIII...haha!😄😄😄
Sekadar berdiri DIDEPAN... HUTANG KERETA CEPAT DENGAN CHINA pun China tak mahu Turunkan bunga HUTANG buat apa... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapus🛠️ 1. AGING EQUIPMENT ACROSS ALL BRANCHES
Hapus• Air Force (RMAF): Out of 28 fighter jets, reportedly only four were operational at one point. Maintenance issues and lack of spare parts have grounded much of the fleet.
• Army: The Condor Armoured Personnel Carriers, in service since the 1980s, are overdue for replacement. Plans to procure 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV) are still pending approval.
• Navy: Many vessels are over 40 years old, with outdated combat systems and limited endurance. The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, meant to modernize the fleet, has faced years of delays and budget overruns.
💰 2. Budget Constraints & Misallocation
• Malondesh spends around USD 4 billion annually on defense, but over 40% goes to salaries and allowances, leaving limited funds for modernization.
• Procurement budgets are often absorbed by progressive payments for delayed projects, such as the FA-50 fighter jets and the troubled LCS program.
• The depreciation of the ringgit further reduces purchasing power for foreign-sourced equipment.
🧭 3. Lack of Strategic Direction
• The defense industry suffers from unclear government guidance on long-term goals.
• Frequent changes in leadership—four Prime Ministers since 2018—have disrupted continuity in defense planning.
🧑✈️ 4. Manpower & Training Gaps
• While Malondesh has 113,000 active personnel and 51,600 reserves, training and readiness levels vary widely.
• Specialized units like PASKAL and GGK are well-regarded, but broader force readiness is inconsistent.
🌏 5. Regional Disadvantage
• Malondesh ranks behind Vietnam and Indonesia in terms of military strength, according to former Defense Minister Mat Sabu.
• This affects Malondesh ability to assert its interests in contested areas like the South China Sea.
💸 1. Budget Breakdown: Overweight on Operational Costs
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o Salaries and allowances alone accounted for RM8.2 billion (~41.5%).
o Maintenance and asset upkeep received RM5.8 billion in 2025.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, infrastructure, and strategic programs.
Impact: The budget is heavily skewed toward sustaining the current force rather than building future capabilities.
🧱 2. Procurement Funding Is Thin and Fragmented
• The RM5.71 billion allocated for procurement in 2024 includes:
o Scheduled payments for existing contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets, A400M upgrades, LCS ships)
o Small-scale purchases like communication gear, vehicles, and small arms
• Due to ringgit depreciation and reliance on foreign suppliers, real purchasing power is eroded.
Impact: Malondesh struggles to fund new combat systems, let alone strategic platforms like missiles, drones, or ISR networks.
🧰 3. Maintenance of Aging Assets Is Costly and Inefficient
• Much of the RM5.8 billion maintenance budget goes to keeping legacy platforms operational, some over 30–40 years old.
• Example: The Navy’s Condor APCs and older patrol vessels require frequent repairs, yet offer limited tactical value.
Impact: High sunk costs in outdated systems reduce the ability to invest in transformative technologies.
🧠 4. No Dedicated Strategic Investment Stream
• Malondesh lacks a multi-year capital investment framework for defense.
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, there’s no ring-fenced funding for:
o Missile development
o Cyber warfare
o Space-based surveillance
o Indigenous defense R&D
Impact: Strategic programs are ad hoc, underfunded, and vulnerable to political shifts.
📊 Summary Table: How Budget Crowds Out Combat Capability
Category Allocation (2024–2025) Strategic Impact
Salaries & Allowances RM8.2B (~41.5%) Limits flexibility for modernization
Maintenance & Upkeep RM5.8B Sustains aging platforms, not upgrades
Procurement (net new) RM5.71B (incl. legacy contracts) Thin funding for new combat systems
R&D / Strategic Programs Negligible No indigenous capability development
💸 1. Budget Breakdown: Overweight on Operational Costs
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o Salaries and allowances alone accounted for RM8.2 billion (~41.5%).
o Maintenance and asset upkeep received RM5.8 billion in 2025.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, infrastructure, and strategic programs.
Impact: The budget is heavily skewed toward sustaining the current force rather than building future capabilities.
🧱 2. Procurement Funding Is Thin and Fragmented
• The RM5.71 billion allocated for procurement in 2024 includes:
o Scheduled payments for existing contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets, A400M upgrades, LCS ships)
o Small-scale purchases like communication gear, vehicles, and small arms
• Due to ringgit depreciation and reliance on foreign suppliers, real purchasing power is eroded.
Impact: Malondesh struggles to fund new combat systems, let alone strategic platforms like missiles, drones, or ISR networks.
🧰 3. Maintenance of Aging Assets Is Costly and Inefficient
• Much of the RM5.8 billion maintenance budget goes to keeping legacy platforms operational, some over 30–40 years old.
• Example: The Navy’s Condor APCs and older patrol vessels require frequent repairs, yet offer limited tactical value.
Impact: High sunk costs in outdated systems reduce the ability to invest in transformative technologies.
🧠 4. No Dedicated Strategic Investment Stream
• Malondesh lacks a multi-year capital investment framework for defense.
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, there’s no ring-fenced funding for:
o Missile development
o Cyber warfare
o Space-based surveillance
o Indigenous defense R&D
Impact: Strategic programs are ad hoc, underfunded, and vulnerable to political shifts.
📊 Summary Table: How Budget Crowds Out Combat Capability
Category Allocation (2024–2025) Strategic Impact
Salaries & Allowances RM8.2B (~41.5%) Limits flexibility for modernization
Maintenance & Upkeep RM5.8B Sustains aging platforms, not upgrades
Procurement (net new) RM5.71B (incl. legacy contracts) Thin funding for new combat systems
R&D / Strategic Programs Negligible No indigenous capability development
ECCRL..wuiihh dari $ 20 biliun proyek belum selesai, bisa naik lagi 2x lipat...Ngerih Utang seblah ke Elder Bradernya haha!🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusapalagi Ghost Town $ 100 biliun...darimana wangnya haha!🥶☠️🥶
Yang penting DIDEPAN.... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusBunga utang kereta cepat Jakarta-Bandung 3,4%, jebakan utang China
https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c72vg2v5732o
🧩 1. COMPLEX & OPAQUE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
Hapus• The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) follows procurement guidelines set by the Ministry of Finance, but defense deals are often complex and sensitive, making oversight difficult.
• Procurement is frequently conducted via single-source or limited tendering, with less than one-third of major contracts awarded through open competition.
• This environment favors politically connected firms, often involving ex-military officers on corporate boards, which can distort priorities and inflate costs.
🕵️ 2. Role of Middlemen & “Agents”
• A major source of mismanagement is the entrenched role of middlemen, who act as intermediaries in defense deals.
• These agents—sometimes retired generals—can inflate prices, reduce transparency, and compromise the quality of procured assets.
• In 2023, Malondesh King Sultan Ibrahim publicly rebuked the Ministry of Defence for relying on “agents” and “salesmen,” warning against repeating past procurement mistakes.
🚨 3. High-Profile Scandals
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project is the most notorious example. Intended to modernize the navy, it was marred by delays, cost overruns, and poor oversight.
• Another scandal involved the New Generation Patrol Vessel (NGPV) program, which was mismanaged after the privatization of the Lumut naval dockyard. Funds were siphoned off, and the fleet expansion fell short of expectations.
📉 4. Impact on Military Readiness
• Mismanaged procurement leads to:
o Delayed delivery of critical assets
o Operational gaps in air, sea, and land capabilities
o Wasted taxpayer money with little strategic return
• Malondesh ability to respond to regional threats—especially in the South China Sea—is weakened by these systemic issues.
💰 1. Budget Composition: Operational vs Development
Hapus• In 2025, Malondesh allocated RM21.2 billion to the Ministry of Defence.
o Operational Expenditure (OPEX): RM13.36 billion (~63%) — covers salaries, pensions, allowances, and day-to-day operations.
o Development Expenditure (DE): RM7.49 billion (~37%) — intended for asset acquisition, infrastructure, and modernization.
Impact: The bulk of funding goes to sustaining the status quo, not building future capabilities.
👥 2. Personnel Costs Dominate Spending
• Salaries, pensions, and welfare programs for active-duty personnel and veterans consume over half of OPEX.
• Initiatives like RKAT housing repairs, pension adjustments, and cost-of-living allowances are important for morale but crowd out capital investment.
• Malondesh armed forces have a relatively large administrative footprint compared to its combat strength.
Impact: High fixed costs reduce flexibility for strategic procurement or force restructuring.
🔧 3. Maintenance Over Modernization
• RM5.8 billion in 2025 was earmarked for maintenance, repair, and acquisition of military assets.
• However, most of this goes to keeping aging platforms operational, not acquiring new ones.
• Example: The Royal Malondeshn Navy spends heavily on maintaining ships that are 30–40 years old, with minimal upgrades.
Impact: Funds are spent on patching legacy systems rather than leapfrogging to modern technologies.
📉 4. Low R&D and Capability Investment
• Malondesh allocates negligible funding to defense R&D, indigenous production, or strategic systems (e.g. missiles, cyber, ISR).
• Unlike peers such as Indonesia or Vietnam, Malondesh has no major co-development programs or defense industrial offsets.
Impact: Malondesh remains dependent on foreign suppliers and lacks autonomy in capability planning.
📊 Summary Table: Budget Allocation Weaknesses
Category Description Strategic Impact
Operational Expenditure RM13.36B for salaries, pensions, and operations Limits modernization and flexibility
Personnel Costs High welfare and admin spending Crowds out combat capability investment
Maintenance Focus RM5.8B for upkeep of aging assets Sustains outdated platforms
Low R&D Investment Minimal funding for innovation or strategic systems No indigenous capability development
🚫 1. No Long-Range Strike Systems
Hapus• Malondesh does not possess ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, or standoff precision-guided munitions.
• Its air force lacks platforms capable of launching deep-strike missions. The Su-30MKM fighters have range and payload potential, but Malondesh has not equipped them with long-range strike munitions like Kh-59 or BrahMos.
• Naval assets are similarly limited—no ship-launched cruise missiles or land-attack capabilities exist.
Impact: Malondesh cannot credibly threaten retaliation against adversaries beyond its borders, reducing its strategic leverage.
🛡️ 2. Deterrence by Denial, Not Punishment
• Malondesh defense doctrine emphasizes “concentric deterrence”, focusing on denial rather than punishment.
• This means the strategy is built around preventing aggression, not retaliating against it.
• While this suits peacetime stability, it’s increasingly inadequate in a region where China, Vietnam, and the Philippines are investing in deterrence-by-punishment capabilities.
Impact: Malondesh lacks escalation control and cannot impose costs on adversaries, weakening its deterrent posture.
💸 3. Budget Priorities Undermine Capability Development
• Over 60–70% of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations.
• This leaves minimal room for R&D, procurement of advanced weapons, or strategic force development.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal and delays have further eroded trust and diverted resources from strategic programs.
Impact: Malondesh is stuck in a cycle of maintaining legacy systems rather than investing in future capabilities.
🌐 4. No Indigenous Missile or Strategic Weapons Program
• Unlike regional peers such as Indonesia (which is co-developing missiles with Turkey) or Vietnam (which fields Russian cruise missiles), Malondesh has no domestic missile development program.
• It also lacks partnerships for co-production or licensed manufacturing of strategic weapons.
Impact: Total dependence on foreign suppliers; no autonomy in strategic force planning.
📊 Summary Table: Strategic Strike & Deterrence Weaknesses
Weakness Description Strategic Impact
No long-range strike systems No cruise, ballistic, or standoff weapons Cannot retaliate or shape adversary behavior
Denial-based doctrine Focus on defense, not punishment Weak deterrence posture
Budget constraints Most funds go to salaries and maintenance No room for strategic force development
No indigenous capability No missile R&D or co-production High dependency, low autonomy
Manakala GORILLA... Yang penting DIDEPAN dengan Presiden China... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusChina berkeras bunga utang kereta cepat Jakarta-Bandung 3,4%, jebakan utang China
https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c72vg2v5732o
🚢 AGING NAVAL ASSETS – ROYAL MALONDESHN NAVY (RMN)
Hapus⚙️ Fleet Breakdown
• 34 RMN vessels have exceeded their intended service life, with 28 of them over 40 years old.
• These include Fast Attack Craft (FAC) that are now half a century old, far beyond modern standards.
• The RMN operates 53 ships across various classes, but many are technologically outdated and costly to maintain.
⚠️ Operational Risks
• Older ships suffer from:
o Reduced combat capability
o Outdated sensors and weapons systems
o High maintenance costs and frequent breakdowns
• The sinking of the KD Pendekar, a 45-year-old vessel, in August 2024 due to flooding highlights the dangers of keeping obsolete ships in service.
🪖 Aging Ground Assets – Malondeshn Army
📊 Asset Overview
• 108 Army units have surpassed 30 years of service.
• These include aging armored vehicles, artillery systems, and logistics platforms that are increasingly difficult to maintain and upgrade.
🔧 Maintenance Challenges
• Spare parts for older systems are scarce or discontinued.
• Modernization plans are slow due to budget constraints and procurement delays.
• Operational efficiency is compromised, especially in jungle and border operations where reliability is critical.
🧭 Strategic Implications
• Malondesh aging assets limit its ability to:
o Respond to regional threats, especially in the South China Sea
o Participate effectively in joint exercises and peacekeeping missions
o Maintain deterrence posture against more modernized neighbors
🔧 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped MRO Infrastructure
Hapus• Malondesh defense MRO sector is technically shallow, with most local firms focused on commercial aviation, not military-grade systems.
• Despite having over 200 aerospace companies, only a handful are equipped to handle complex military platforms like fighter jets, naval combat systems, or armored vehicles.
• The defense MRO ecosystem lacks dedicated facilities for:
o Engine overhauls (especially for Su-30MKM and Hawk aircraft)
o Combat system integration
o Naval propulsion and sensor maintenance
Impact: Military platforms face long downtimes and must rely on foreign OEMs for critical servicing.
🧱 2. Slow Localization and Limited Technical Depth
• Malondesh has made partial progress in localizing MRO for platforms like the F/A-18D Hornet, but most high-end servicing still requires foreign technical assistance.
• There is no national MRO roadmap aligned with defense modernization goals, unlike countries like Turkey or South Korea that have built robust domestic ecosystems through tech transfer and industrial offsets.
• Local firms lack access to classified schematics, proprietary software, and advanced diagnostic tools needed for full-spectrum support.
Impact: Strategic dependence persists, and Malondesh cannot sustain its fleet autonomously during crises or embargoes.
🕵️ 3. Weak Vendor Oversight and Governance
• The 2025 Auditor-General’s Report flagged major lapses in vendor management:
o RM162.75 million in late penalties were not collected
o RM1.42 million in fines were never imposed for delayed maintenance
• Contracts are often awarded to politically connected firms without rigorous performance benchmarks or technical vetting.
• Oversight is fragmented across MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and service branches, leading to diffused accountability.
Impact: Maintenance quality is inconsistent, costs are inflated, and readiness suffers.
📉 4. Obsolete Platforms and Spare Part Bottlenecks
• Malondesh inventory includes 171 platforms over 30 years old, many of which require parts that are:
o No longer manufactured
o Sourced from defunct suppliers
o Incompatible with newer systems
• RM384.5 million was lost due to 1.62 million unused spare parts that no longer matched operational needs.
Impact: Maintenance becomes reactive and inefficient, with high sunk costs and low operational returns.
📊 Summary Table: MRO Asset Weaknesses in Malondeshn Military
Weakness Area Description Strategic Impact
Infrastructure gaps Few facilities for military-grade MRO Long downtimes, foreign dependency
Slow localization Limited tech transfer, no unified roadmap No autonomy in fleet sustainment
Vendor oversight Poor contract enforcement, inflated costs Inconsistent quality, low accountability
Spare part obsolescence Aging platforms, mismatched inventory Budget waste, reduced readiness
🧭 Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh ability to sustain combat operations over time is compromised.
• Without robust MRO capabilities, even newly acquired platforms (e.g. FA-50 jets, LCS ships) risk becoming high-cost liabilities.
• Regional peers like Indonesia and Singapore are investing in integrated MRO hubs, giving them a long-term readiness advantage.
🚫 1. Limited Missile Inventory and Range
Hapus• The Malondeshn Army currently fields only short-range air defense systems, notably the Starstreak and aging Rapier missiles.
• These systems are effective only within 5–7 km, offering minimal protection against modern aircraft, drones, or cruise missiles.
• Malondesh lacks medium- and long-range surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), leaving critical infrastructure and forward bases vulnerable.
Impact: Inability to defend against high-altitude or standoff threats; poor layered defense architecture.
🛠️ 2. Delayed Modernization and Funding Gaps
• Although Malondesh has published requirements for new Ground-Based Air Defence (GBAD) systems, no funding has been allocated.
• Proposed systems like MBDA’s MICA VL NG and EMADS (CAMM) offer 40+ km range and advanced seekers, but remain unprocured.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program includes VL MICA missiles, but the ships themselves are years behind schedule, delaying missile deployment.
Impact: Strategic plans remain theoretical; operational readiness is compromised by procurement delays.
🔄 3. Fragmented Missile Ecosystem
• Malondesh missile systems are sourced from multiple foreign suppliers (UK, France, Russia), resulting in:
o Interoperability issues
o Complex logistics and maintenance
o Training burdens across platforms
• No indigenous missile production capability exists, and local defense industry lacks integration with global supply chains.
Impact: High dependency on foreign vendors; low sustainability in prolonged conflict scenarios.
📉 4. No Strategic Strike or Deterrent Capability
• Malondesh does not possess ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, or standoff precision-guided munitions.
• This absence limits its ability to:
o Strike high-value targets beyond its borders
o Deter adversaries with credible retaliation
o Support joint operations with regional partners
Impact: Malondesh remains a defensive-only actor, unable to shape regional dynamics or respond asymmetrically.
📊 Summary Table: Missile Capability Weaknesses
Weakness Description Strategic Impact
Short-range inventory Only Starstreak and Rapier systems in service Vulnerable to modern air threats
Procurement delays No funding for new GBAD systems; LCS delays Reduced readiness and deterrence
Fragmented ecosystem Multiple suppliers, no local production Poor interoperability and sustainment
No strike capability No cruise or ballistic missiles Limited strategic options and deterrence
Alhamdulilah ternyata LEONARDO P-72M MPA pesanan MALAYSIA sudah mulai diuji terbang.... HOREYYYY... 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
BalasHapushttps://x.com/JohnMYSreview/status/1963274592039862651
🚨 1. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) SCANDAL
Hapus💰 What Happened
• Malondesh government allocated RM9 billion for six Littoral Combat Ships.
• Despite billions spent, no ships were delivered as of 2025.
• The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) revealed cost overruns, mismanagement, and non-compliance with procurement procedures.
👤 Key Figures
• Former Navy Chief was implicated but later discharged due to health concerns.
• The scandal sparked public outrage and demands for transparency.
🚁 2. MD530G Helicopter Procurement Failure
🛠️ The Issue
• Malondesh paid 35% upfront for six McDonnell Douglas MD530G helicopters in 2015.
• None were delivered by the promised 2018 deadline.
• The deal, worth RM300 million, became a symbol of failed oversight.
🧾 3. Land Swap Scandal
🏗️ What Went Wrong
• Military land near urban centers was swapped for remote land to build camps.
• Many of these swaps were poorly executed, resulting in RM500 million in losses.
• Defense Minister Mohamad Sabu criticized the deals as wasteful and corrupt.
🕵️ 4. RM3 Million Smuggling Conspiracy
🔍 Operation Sohor (2025)
• Malondeshn Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) arrested 10 individuals, including 3 active military officers and 2 ex-intelligence personnel.
• They allegedly leaked operational intelligence to smugglers for RM30,000–RM50,000 per trip.
• The syndicate moved contraband worth RM5 million monthly, compromising border security
🚫 1. Limited Missile Inventory and Range
Hapus• The Malondeshn Army currently fields only short-range air defense systems, notably the Starstreak and aging Rapier missiles.
• These systems are effective only within 5–7 km, offering minimal protection against modern aircraft, drones, or cruise missiles.
• Malondesh lacks medium- and long-range surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), leaving critical infrastructure and forward bases vulnerable.
Impact: Inability to defend against high-altitude or standoff threats; poor layered defense architecture.
🛠️ 2. Delayed Modernization and Funding Gaps
• Although Malondesh has published requirements for new Ground-Based Air Defence (GBAD) systems, no funding has been allocated.
• Proposed systems like MBDA’s MICA VL NG and EMADS (CAMM) offer 40+ km range and advanced seekers, but remain unprocured.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program includes VL MICA missiles, but the ships themselves are years behind schedule, delaying missile deployment.
Impact: Strategic plans remain theoretical; operational readiness is compromised by procurement delays.
🔄 3. Fragmented Missile Ecosystem
• Malondesh missile systems are sourced from multiple foreign suppliers (UK, France, Russia), resulting in:
o Interoperability issues
o Complex logistics and maintenance
o Training burdens across platforms
• No indigenous missile production capability exists, and local defense industry lacks integration with global supply chains.
Impact: High dependency on foreign vendors; low sustainability in prolonged conflict scenarios.
📉 4. No Strategic Strike or Deterrent Capability
• Malondesh does not possess ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, or standoff precision-guided munitions.
• This absence limits its ability to:
o Strike high-value targets beyond its borders
o Deter adversaries with credible retaliation
o Support joint operations with regional partners
Impact: Malondesh remains a defensive-only actor, unable to shape regional dynamics or respond asymmetrically.
📊 Summary Table: Missile Capability Weaknesses
Weakness Description Strategic Impact
Short-range inventory Only Starstreak and Rapier systems in service Vulnerable to modern air threats
Procurement delays No funding for new GBAD systems; LCS delays Reduced readiness and deterrence
Fragmented ecosystem Multiple suppliers, no local production Poor interoperability and sustainment
No strike capability No cruise or ballistic missiles Limited strategic options and deterrence
🕴️ 1. Entrenched Role of Middlemen
Hapus• Defense contracts are frequently brokered by agents or intermediaries, many of whom are retired military officers or politically connected individuals.
• These middlemen often act as gatekeepers between the Ministry of Defence and foreign suppliers, adding layers of cost and complexity.
• According to analysts, this system is deeply entrenched and has become an “open secret” in Malondesh defense ecosystem.
Impact: Prices are inflated, procurement timelines are extended, and transparency is compromised.
🧱 2. Opaque Tendering and Limited Competition
• Fewer than one-third of major defense contracts are awarded through open competition.
• Most deals are conducted via single-source or limited tenders, which favor firms with insider access or political leverage.
• This environment allows deal structuring to be influenced by non-technical considerations, including patronage and lobbying.
Impact: Merit-based selection is sidelined, and cost-effectiveness suffers.
🏛️ 3. Politically Connected Firms Dominate
• Many defense contractors have ex-military figures on their boards, giving them privileged access to decision-makers.
• These firms often win contracts despite offering older platforms or substandard equipment—as seen in the attempted purchase of 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which Malondesh King publicly condemned as “flying coffins”2.
• The King also rebuked “agents” and “salesmen” in the Ministry of Defence, warning that inflated middleman pricing would render the defense budget perpetually insufficient.
Impact: Public funds are wasted, and the armed forces receive outdated or unsuitable equipment.
📉 4. Consequences for Readiness and Reform
• Inflated costs mean fewer assets can be acquired, and maintenance budgets are squeezed.
• The lack of transparency erodes public trust and makes it difficult for oversight bodies like the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to hold officials accountable.
• While the King’s intervention led to the cancellation of the Black Hawk deal, systemic reform remains elusive.
📊 Summary Table: How Middlemen & Opaque Deals Inflate Costs
Mechanism Description Consequence
Middlemen Agents with insider access broker deals Inflated prices, longer timelines
Limited tendering Few contracts awarded via open competition Reduced transparency, poor value
Politically connected firms Ex-military or political figures dominate contractor space Patronage, outdated equipment
Lack of oversight Weak enforcement and redacted audits Mismanagement persists
Ini apa guys...? 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusChina berkeras bunga utang kereta cepat Jakarta-Bandung 3,4%, jebakan utang China
https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c72vg2v5732o
🛠️ WHAT “OUTDATED” REALLY MEANS
HapusOutdated systems refer to:
• Sensors that lack modern tracking, targeting, and surveillance capabilities
• Weapons with limited range, accuracy, and compatibility with newer platforms
• Command-and-control systems that cannot integrate with digital battlefield networks
🚢 Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN)
• 28 ships are over 40 years old, including Fast Attack Craft and patrol vessels.
• Many vessels still use analog radar systems, manual fire-control systems, and obsolete sonar.
• These systems struggle to detect modern threats like stealth submarines or drones.
• Maintenance costs are skyrocketing, and spare parts are often unavailable or discontinued.
🛩️ Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF)
• Older aircraft like the MiG-29N (retired) and F/A-18D Hornets still rely on legacy avionics.
• Limited electronic warfare capabilities and outdated targeting pods reduce effectiveness in modern air combat.
• Poor interoperability with newer aircraft and NATO-standard systems.
🪖 Malondeshn Army
• Ground vehicles, including legacy APCs and tanks, use basic optical sights and manual targeting systems.
• Many artillery units lack GPS-guided fire control, making precision strikes difficult.
• Communication systems are often analog or semi-digital, limiting coordination in joint operations.
⚠️ Consequences of Technological Lag
• Reduced combat effectiveness in high-tech warfare environments
• Increased vulnerability to cyber attacks and electronic jamming
• Limited participation in multinational exercises and peacekeeping missions
• Higher risk to personnel due to unreliable systems, as seen in the 2025 commando tragedy linked to aging gear
🚀 1. Accelerated Modernization by Neighbors
Hapus• Singapore maintains one of the most technologically advanced militaries in Southeast Asia, with investments in F-15SG fighters, submarines, and integrated air defense systems.
• Indonesia has ramped up procurement of Rafale jets, frigates, and drones, aiming for a more balanced tri-service force.
• Vietnam has focused on asymmetric capabilities, acquiring Kilo-class submarines, coastal missile systems, and modernizing its air defense.
• Philippines is deepening defense ties with the US, Japan, and Australia, acquiring BrahMos missiles and upgrading its naval fleet.
Result: Malondesh risks falling behind in both conventional and hybrid warfare capabilities2.
📉 2. Malondesh Budget Bottleneck
• Malondesh defense budget has stagnated at RM15–18 billion annually, with 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance, leaving little for modernization.
• Major projects like the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program have been plagued by delays and scandals, further eroding trust and capability.
Result: While neighbors invest in future-ready systems, Malondesh struggles to maintain legacy platforms.
🌊 3. Strategic Exposure in the South China Sea
• China’s coast guard and maritime militia have repeatedly entered Malondesh Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), testing its maritime sovereignty.
• Malondesh aging naval fleet—28 of 34 vessels are over 40 years old—limits its ability to respond effectively.
Result: Malondesh deterrence posture is weakened, especially in contested maritime zones.
🧭 4. Diplomatic vs. Hard Power Approach
• Malondesh has traditionally relied on quiet diplomacy and ASEAN mechanisms to manage regional tensions.
• However, the geopolitical landscape is shifting toward hard power signaling, with countries like the Philippines and Vietnam adopting more assertive defense postures.
Result: Malondesh soft approach is increasingly outpaced by neighbors who combine diplomacy with credible military strength.
📊 Summary Table: Malondesh vs. Regional Peers
Country Modernization Focus Strategic Advantage Over Malondesh
Singapore High-tech platforms, integrated C4ISR Superior air/naval integration
Indonesia Balanced tri-service upgrades Larger force, expanding reach
Vietnam Asymmetric coastal defense Strong deterrence in South China Sea
Philippines Allied-backed modernization Rapid capability growth, joint exercises
Malondesh Aging inventory, budget constraints Limited deterrence, slow procurement
🧓 1. Aging Components Beyond Service Life
Hapus• As of 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service2.
• Many platforms—like the Royal Malondeshn Navy’s Fast Attack Craft (FAC)—are over 40 years old, with some approaching 50 years.
• These assets were designed for past-era threats and technologies, and their mechanical systems are now prone to fatigue, corrosion, and failure.
Result: Even routine operations carry elevated risk of malfunction, requiring constant patchwork maintenance.
🌴 2. Tropical Climate Accelerates Wear
• Malondesh’s hot, humid, and saline environment is particularly harsh on military hardware:
o Metal fatigue and corrosion are accelerated, especially in naval vessels and aircraft.
o Rubber seals, electronics, and hydraulics degrade faster under tropical heat and moisture.
• The Navy has acknowledged that many vessels no longer meet modern standards due to environmental degradation.
Result: Maintenance cycles shorten, costs rise, and reliability drops.
🔧 3. Obsolete Systems and Spare Parts Shortage
• Many legacy platforms rely on foreign OEMs that have ceased production or support.
• Spare parts must be sourced internationally, often at inflated prices and long lead times.
• In some cases, technicians resort to cannibalizing other units or fabricating parts locally—neither of which guarantees reliability.
Result: Delays in repairs, reduced fleet availability, and compromised safety.
⚠️ 4. Operational Incidents and Safety Risks
• A tragic example: In July 2025, a Malondeshn commando died during a maritime exercise due to suspected failure of aging diving equipment.
• The Army Chief confirmed that the gear was “rather old,” prompting a full audit of equipment lifecycle and maintenance protocols.
Result: Legacy systems not only reduce readiness—they pose direct risks to personnel.
📊 Summary Table: Breakdown Drivers in Malondeshn Military
Factor Description Operational Impact
Aging components Platforms >30–50 years old, beyond design limits Frequent failures, low reliability
Tropical wear Heat, humidity, salt accelerate degradation Shorter maintenance cycles
Obsolete systems Legacy tech, no OEM support Spare part shortages, delays
Safety incidents Equipment failures linked to fatal accidents Personnel risk, public scrutiny
Bukan HIGH SPEED TRAIN
BalasHapusECRL negri🎰kasino genting 3X lebih mahal dari WHOOOSH haha!🤣🤣🤣
biasalah warganyet kl mudah di tipu apalagi tipe m...kasi fisank beres haha!🍌🍌🍌
BalasHapusJelas masuk PERANGKAP HUTANG CHINA guys.... 🤣🤣🤣
Luhut Gagal Desak China Kurangi Bunga Utang Kereta Cepat Jadi 2 Persen
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20230410165231-92-935833/luhut-gagal-desak-china-kurangi-bunga-utang-kereta-cepat-jadi-2-persen
💸 1. LONG-TERM FINANCIAL BURDEN
Hapus• Malaysia’s RM16.5 billion lease for 28 helicopters over 15 years may cost more than outright purchase.
• For comparison, Poland bought 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing fewer units for nearly double the price.
• Critics argue that bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance) inflate the cost, creating a hidden financial strain over time.
🛠️ 2. Limited Control Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract.
• This restricts Malaysia’s ability to:
o Upgrade systems
o Reconfigure for new missions
o Integrate with other platforms
• Strategic flexibility is compromised, especially in emergencies or regional conflicts.
🧭 3. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Leasing bypasses local manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance, which could have boosted Malaysia’s defense industry.
• No significant technology transfer or job creation occurs under private leasing arrangements.
• This weakens Malaysia’s long-term goal of defense self-reliance.
🕵️♂️ 4. Procurement Transparency Risks
• The deal was awarded to Weststar Aviation, a private firm, raising concerns about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals (e.g., LCS and MD530G) have made the public wary of opaque procurement processes.
• Leasing may reduce upfront corruption risks, but it doesn’t eliminate contractual opacity.
⚠️ 5. Strategic Dependency
• Malaysia becomes dependent on private contractors for asset readiness and maintenance.
• If the contractor fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), national security could be compromised.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay operations or ground critical assets.
🗣️ Political & Public Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have criticized the lease as overpriced and strategically flawed.
• The government defends it as a way to avoid upfront costs and ensure faster deployment, but the debate continues in Parliament and among analysts
💸 1. POTENTIALLY HIGHER LONG-TERM COSTS
• Critics argue that leasing may cost more than outright purchase over time.
• For example, Poland purchased 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing 28 helicopters for RM16.5 billion (~US$3.5 billion) over 15 years.
• Leasing includes bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance), but the total cost may exceed the value of the helicopters themselves.
🕵️♂️ 2. Transparency & Procurement Concerns
• The deal was signed with Weststar Aviation, a private firm owned by a prominent businessman, raising questions about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals in Malaysia’s defense procurement—like the LCS and MD530G helicopter failures—have made the public wary of opaque contracts and lack of competitive bidding.
🛠️ 3. Limited Sovereignty Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract, which may limit:
o Upgrades or modifications
o Deployment flexibility
o Integration with other military systems
• This could hinder Malaysia’s ability to adapt the fleet to evolving threats or mission needs.
🧭 4. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Purchasing helicopters could have supported local assembly, maintenance, and technology transfer, boosting Malaysia’s defense industry.
• Leasing centralizes operations under a private provider, reducing opportunities for domestic capability development.
⚠️ 5. Risk of Contractual Disputes or Service Interruptions
• If the leasing company fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), Malaysia may face operational gaps.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay missions or compromise national security.
🗣️ Public & Political Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have called the deal overpriced and strategically flawed, urging a review of procurement practices.
• The Prime Minister defended the lease as a way to avoid maintenance burdens, but critics say it reflects short-term budgeting over long-term planning.
🧓 1. Obsolete Systems and Aging Platforms
Hapus• As of 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service.
• Many platforms—like the Royal Malondeshn Navy’s Fast Attack Craft (FAC) and older patrol vessels—are over 40 years old, far beyond their optimal lifespan.
• These systems were designed decades ago and now lack compatibility with modern sensors, weapons, and communications.
Impact: Upgrades are either impossible or prohibitively expensive, forcing reliance on outdated capabilities.
🔧 2. Dependence on Foreign Spare Parts
• Malondesh military inventory is highly diversified, sourced from the US, UK, France, Russia, and others. This creates logistical complexity:
o Spare parts must be imported from multiple countries.
o Some OEMs have ceased production, making parts scarce or unavailable.
o Political or economic shifts can disrupt supply chains.
Example: The Army’s Condor APCs and Scorpion light tanks require parts from legacy suppliers that no longer support them.
Impact: Long lead times, inflated costs, and cannibalization of other units for parts.
🔁 3. Frequent Breakdowns and Repair Cycles
• Older platforms experience higher failure rates, especially under tropical conditions and extended use.
• Maintenance crews often resort to patchwork fixes, which are temporary and unreliable.
• The Navy reported that 28 of its 34 aging vessels have exceeded 40 years of service, with many no longer meeting operational standards.
Impact: Reduced availability, increased downtime, and lower mission success rates.
📉 4. Budget Drain and Opportunity Cost
• Between 60–70% of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations, leaving little for modernization.
• Funds spent on keeping obsolete systems running could be redirected toward acquiring new platforms or investing in indigenous maintenance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic stagnation—Malondesh spends heavily but gains little in terms of capability.
📊 Summary Table: Why Maintenance Costs Are So High
Factor Description Consequence
Obsolete systems Platforms >30–40 years old, incompatible with modern tech Expensive to maintain, low utility
Foreign parts dependency Diverse suppliers, legacy systems, political risk Long delays, inflated costs
Frequent breakdowns High failure rates, tropical wear, aging components Reduced readiness, more downtime
Budget imbalance Majority spent on upkeep, not modernization Strategic stagnation
🧓 1. Obsolete Systems and Aging Platforms
Hapus• As of 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service.
• Many platforms—like the Royal Malondeshn Navy’s Fast Attack Craft (FAC) and older patrol vessels—are over 40 years old, far beyond their optimal lifespan.
• These systems were designed decades ago and now lack compatibility with modern sensors, weapons, and communications.
Impact: Upgrades are either impossible or prohibitively expensive, forcing reliance on outdated capabilities.
🔧 2. Dependence on Foreign Spare Parts
• Malondesh military inventory is highly diversified, sourced from the US, UK, France, Russia, and others. This creates logistical complexity:
o Spare parts must be imported from multiple countries.
o Some OEMs have ceased production, making parts scarce or unavailable.
o Political or economic shifts can disrupt supply chains.
Example: The Army’s Condor APCs and Scorpion light tanks require parts from legacy suppliers that no longer support them.
Impact: Long lead times, inflated costs, and cannibalization of other units for parts.
🔁 3. Frequent Breakdowns and Repair Cycles
• Older platforms experience higher failure rates, especially under tropical conditions and extended use.
• Maintenance crews often resort to patchwork fixes, which are temporary and unreliable.
• The Navy reported that 28 of its 34 aging vessels have exceeded 40 years of service, with many no longer meeting operational standards.
Impact: Reduced availability, increased downtime, and lower mission success rates.
📉 4. Budget Drain and Opportunity Cost
• Between 60–70% of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations, leaving little for modernization.
• Funds spent on keeping obsolete systems running could be redirected toward acquiring new platforms or investing in indigenous maintenance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic stagnation—Malondesh spends heavily but gains little in terms of capability.
📊 Summary Table: Why Maintenance Costs Are So High
Factor Description Consequence
Obsolete systems Platforms >30–40 years old, incompatible with modern tech Expensive to maintain, low utility
Foreign parts dependency Diverse suppliers, legacy systems, political risk Long delays, inflated costs
Frequent breakdowns High failure rates, tropical wear, aging components Reduced readiness, more downtime
Budget imbalance Majority spent on upkeep, not modernization Strategic stagnation
Jelas masuk PERANGKAP HUTANG CHINA guys.... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusLuhut Gagal Desak China Kurangi Bunga Utang Kereta Cepat Jadi 2 Persen
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20230410165231-92-935833/luhut-gagal-desak-china-kurangi-bunga-utang-kereta-cepat-jadi-2-persen
💸 1. LONG-TERM FINANCIAL BURDEN
Hapus• Malaysia’s RM16.5 billion lease for 28 helicopters over 15 years may cost more than outright purchase.
• For comparison, Poland bought 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing fewer units for nearly double the price.
• Critics argue that bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance) inflate the cost, creating a hidden financial strain over time.
🛠️ 2. Limited Control Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract.
• This restricts Malaysia’s ability to:
o Upgrade systems
o Reconfigure for new missions
o Integrate with other platforms
• Strategic flexibility is compromised, especially in emergencies or regional conflicts.
🧭 3. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Leasing bypasses local manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance, which could have boosted Malaysia’s defense industry.
• No significant technology transfer or job creation occurs under private leasing arrangements.
• This weakens Malaysia’s long-term goal of defense self-reliance.
🕵️♂️ 4. Procurement Transparency Risks
• The deal was awarded to Weststar Aviation, a private firm, raising concerns about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals (e.g., LCS and MD530G) have made the public wary of opaque procurement processes.
• Leasing may reduce upfront corruption risks, but it doesn’t eliminate contractual opacity.
⚠️ 5. Strategic Dependency
• Malaysia becomes dependent on private contractors for asset readiness and maintenance.
• If the contractor fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), national security could be compromised.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay operations or ground critical assets.
🗣️ Political & Public Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have criticized the lease as overpriced and strategically flawed.
• The government defends it as a way to avoid upfront costs and ensure faster deployment, but the debate continues in Parliament and among analysts
🧓 1. Scale of the Aging Inventory
Hapus• As of late 2024, 171 military assets across all three branches of the Malondeshn Armed Forces (ATM) have exceeded 30 years of service:
o Army: 108 units
o Air Force (RMAF): 29 units
o Navy (RMN): 34 vessels
• Many of these platforms—like the Fast Attack Craft (FAC) in the Navy—are over 40 years old, with some approaching half a century in service2.
Implication: These assets suffer from outdated systems, reduced operational capability, and high maintenance costs, making them increasingly unfit for modern warfare.
📉 2. No Structured Replacement Plan
• Malondesh lacks a multi-year force modernization roadmap. Instead, procurement is often ad hoc, reactive, and politically driven.
• The budgeting process does not clearly indicate what assets will be replaced, when, or how funding will be allocated over time.
• For example, the Army is still waiting for approval to replace its aging Condor APC fleet with 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV), despite urgent operational needs.
Implication: Without a structured plan, aging platforms remain in service far beyond their intended lifespan, and capability gaps widen.
🔄 3. Maintenance Burden and Capability Decay
• Older assets require frequent repairs, often with obsolete parts or foreign OEM support, which drives up costs and delays readiness.
• Technological obsolescence means these platforms cannot integrate with newer systems or meet interoperability standards with allies.
Example: The RMN’s older vessels no longer meet modern naval standards in terms of sensors, weapons, or endurance2.
🧭 4. Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh’s ability to project force, defend its maritime zones, and respond to regional threats is diminished.
• Neighboring countries like Indonesia, Vietnam, and Singapore have clear modernization trajectories, leaving Malondesh at risk of falling behind in regional deterrence.
📊 Summary Table: Aging Inventory vs. Lack of Replacement Strategy
Problem Area Description Strategic Impact
Aging platforms 171 assets >30 years old across Army, Navy, Air Force Reduced combat effectiveness
No replacement roadmap No long-term plan for phased recapitalization Procurement delays, capability gaps
High maintenance costs Obsolete systems, foreign parts, frequent breakdowns Budget strain, low readiness
Regional disadvantage Neighbors modernizing faster Loss of deterrence, strategic lag
💰 1. Chronic Budget Constraints
Hapus• Malondesh defense budget has remained stagnant or modest relative to its strategic needs. Successive governments have been unwilling to reallocate funds from other sectors or reduce manpower to prioritize modernization.
• For example, the Army is still awaiting Finance Ministry approval for the procurement of 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV), despite urgent operational requirements.
Result: Procurement plans are delayed or scaled down, leaving aging platforms in service well past their intended lifespan.
🧱 2. Procurement Mismanagement & Delays
• The Auditor-General’s 2025 report flagged RM7.8 billion in armoured vehicle contracts plagued by:
o Delayed deliveries (e.g., 68 GEMPITA units delivered late)
o Full payments made despite contract breaches
o Weak enforcement of penalties (RM162.75 million fine claimed two years late)3
• Maintenance and spare parts for key assets like ADNAN and PENDEKAR were also delayed, with fines left uncollected.
Result: Even when acquisitions are approved, execution is inefficient and accountability is weak.
🕴️ 3. Middlemen & Non-Transparent Deal Structures
• Defense procurement is often conducted via limited tenders or single-source contracts, with fewer than one-third awarded through open competition.
• Politically connected firms—often led by retired military officers—dominate the landscape, inflating costs and reducing transparency.
• The King of Malondesh recently rebuked the Defence Ministry for relying on “agents” and “salesmen,” calling out inflated prices and the attempted purchase of 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which he likened to “flying coffins”.
Result: Corruption risks and inflated pricing erode trust and reduce the effectiveness of spending.
🧓 4. Aging Inventory & No Replacement Strategy
• As of late 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Air Force, and Navy were over 30 years old.
• Yet, there is no clear roadmap for phased replacement or recapitalization, and ad hoc purchases continue to dominate.
Result: Operational readiness suffers, and Malondesh risks capability gaps in key domains like air defense, maritime patrol, and armored mobility.
📊 Summary Table: Why Malondesh Struggles to Acquire Military Assets
Factor Description Impact
Budget limitations Low prioritization of defense in national spending Delayed or cancelled acquisitions
Procurement mismanagement Poor contract enforcement, late deliveries Waste of funds, reduced readiness
Middlemen & opaque deals Politically connected firms inflate costs Corruption risk, poor value
Aging inventory No structured replacement plan Capability gaps, low deterrence
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.... Itu saya belum masuk hal IKN YANG BELUM SIAP SUDAH GAGAL... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusRugi Triliunan Rupiah Tiap Tahun, DPR Khawatir KAI Bangkrut Gara-gara Kelola Kereta Whoosh
https://www.inilah.com/rugi-triliunan-rupiah-tiap-tahun-dpr-khawatir-kai-bangkrut-gara-gara-kelola-kereta-whoosh
💸 1. LONG-TERM FINANCIAL BURDEN
Hapus• Malaysia’s RM16.5 billion lease for 28 helicopters over 15 years may cost more than outright purchase.
• For comparison, Poland bought 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing fewer units for nearly double the price.
• Critics argue that bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance) inflate the cost, creating a hidden financial strain over time.
🛠️ 2. Limited Control Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract.
• This restricts Malaysia’s ability to:
o Upgrade systems
o Reconfigure for new missions
o Integrate with other platforms
• Strategic flexibility is compromised, especially in emergencies or regional conflicts.
🧭 3. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Leasing bypasses local manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance, which could have boosted Malaysia’s defense industry.
• No significant technology transfer or job creation occurs under private leasing arrangements.
• This weakens Malaysia’s long-term goal of defense self-reliance.
🕵️♂️ 4. Procurement Transparency Risks
• The deal was awarded to Weststar Aviation, a private firm, raising concerns about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals (e.g., LCS and MD530G) have made the public wary of opaque procurement processes.
• Leasing may reduce upfront corruption risks, but it doesn’t eliminate contractual opacity.
⚠️ 5. Strategic Dependency
• Malaysia becomes dependent on private contractors for asset readiness and maintenance.
• If the contractor fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), national security could be compromised.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay operations or ground critical assets.
🗣️ Political & Public Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have criticized the lease as overpriced and strategically flawed.
• The government defends it as a way to avoid upfront costs and ensure faster deployment, but the debate continues in Parliament and among analysts
🧾 1. Delayed or Suppressed Audit Findings
Hapus• The Auditor-General’s Reports, which are meant to expose irregularities in defense spending, often face delays in publication or are selectively tabled in Parliament.
• Some findings are redacted or softened before release, especially when they involve politically sensitive contracts or high-ranking officials.
• For example, the 2025 Auditor-General’s Report revealed that RM162.75 million in penalties for late delivery of GEMPITA vehicles were never collected, and RM1.42 million in fines were never imposed2.
Impact: Delayed audits allow problems to fester, and suppressed findings prevent public scrutiny or corrective action.
🕵️ 2. Limited Enforcement of Audit Recommendations
• Although the Auditor-General routinely issues recommendations, ministries and agencies often fail to implement them.
• In 2025, only a fraction of the 22 audit recommendations across seven ministries were acted upon, despite covering RM48.87 billion in programs.
• The Ministry of Defence was flagged for fragmenting maintenance contracts to bypass procurement controls, yet no disciplinary action was taken.
Impact: Without enforcement, audits become symbolic rather than corrective.
🧱 3. Structural Weaknesses in Oversight Mechanisms
• Malondesh lacks an independent defense procurement oversight body. Oversight is split between the Ministry of Finance, Prime Minister’s Department, and MINDEF itself—creating conflicts of interest.
• Internal audit units within the Armed Forces are under-resourced and lack authority to challenge senior leadership.
• There’s no legal requirement for real-time audit tracking or public disclosure of contract performance.
Impact: Oversight is fragmented, reactive, and vulnerable to political interference.
🔄 4. Culture of Impunity and Political Protection
• High-profile scandals (e.g. LCS, Scorpene submarines) have rarely led to convictions or full asset recovery.
• Procurement agents and contractors with political ties often avoid prosecution, even when audit reports implicate them.
• Transparency International Malondesh has called this a “culture of impunity”, where systemic failures are normalized.
Impact: Accountability is undermined, and corruption risks remain entrenched.
📊 Summary Table: Audit Weaknesses and Their Consequences
Audit Weakness Consequence for Military Procurement
Delayed or redacted reports Public unaware of mismanagement
Poor enforcement of recommendations No corrective action taken
Fragmented oversight Conflicts of interest, weak governance
Political protection No accountability for procurement failures
🧾 1. Delayed or Suppressed Audit Findings
Hapus• The Auditor-General’s Reports, which are meant to expose irregularities in defense spending, often face delays in publication or are selectively tabled in Parliament.
• Some findings are redacted or softened before release, especially when they involve politically sensitive contracts or high-ranking officials.
• For example, the 2025 Auditor-General’s Report revealed that RM162.75 million in penalties for late delivery of GEMPITA vehicles were never collected, and RM1.42 million in fines were never imposed2.
Impact: Delayed audits allow problems to fester, and suppressed findings prevent public scrutiny or corrective action.
🕵️ 2. Limited Enforcement of Audit Recommendations
• Although the Auditor-General routinely issues recommendations, ministries and agencies often fail to implement them.
• In 2025, only a fraction of the 22 audit recommendations across seven ministries were acted upon, despite covering RM48.87 billion in programs.
• The Ministry of Defence was flagged for fragmenting maintenance contracts to bypass procurement controls, yet no disciplinary action was taken.
Impact: Without enforcement, audits become symbolic rather than corrective.
🧱 3. Structural Weaknesses in Oversight Mechanisms
• Malondesh lacks an independent defense procurement oversight body. Oversight is split between the Ministry of Finance, Prime Minister’s Department, and MINDEF itself—creating conflicts of interest.
• Internal audit units within the Armed Forces are under-resourced and lack authority to challenge senior leadership.
• There’s no legal requirement for real-time audit tracking or public disclosure of contract performance.
Impact: Oversight is fragmented, reactive, and vulnerable to political interference.
🔄 4. Culture of Impunity and Political Protection
• High-profile scandals (e.g. LCS, Scorpene submarines) have rarely led to convictions or full asset recovery.
• Procurement agents and contractors with political ties often avoid prosecution, even when audit reports implicate them.
• Transparency International Malondesh has called this a “culture of impunity”, where systemic failures are normalized.
Impact: Accountability is undermined, and corruption risks remain entrenched.
📊 Summary Table: Audit Weaknesses and Their Consequences
Audit Weakness Consequence for Military Procurement
Delayed or redacted reports Public unaware of mismanagement
Poor enforcement of recommendations No corrective action taken
Fragmented oversight Conflicts of interest, weak governance
Political protection No accountability for procurement failures
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.... Itu saya belum masuk hal IKN YANG BELUM SIAP SUDAH GAGAL... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusRugi Triliunan Rupiah Tiap Tahun, DPR Khawatir KAI Bangkrut Gara-gara Kelola Kereta Whoosh
https://www.inilah.com/rugi-triliunan-rupiah-tiap-tahun-dpr-khawatir-kai-bangkrut-gara-gara-kelola-kereta-whoosh
📣 1. PROCUREMENT SCANDALS FUEL PUBLIC DISTRUST
HapusLittoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal
• The RM9 billion LCS project became a lightning rod for criticism when no ships were delivered despite billions spent.
• Media outlets and the Public Accounts Committee exposed mismanagement, cost overruns, and non-compliance, triggering public outrage and parliamentary scrutiny.
MD530G Helicopter Failure
• Malaysia paid RM112 million upfront for six helicopters that were never delivered on time.
• The media labeled it a “ghost fleet,” and citizens questioned the lack of accountability.
👑 2. Royal Intervention Amplifies Criticism
• King Sultan Ibrahim, also Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, publicly condemned the procurement of 35-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, calling them “flying coffins.”
• His rebuke—“If you don’t know the price, ask me first”—went viral, reinforcing public frustration over opaque and overpriced deals.
🕵️♂️ 3. Smuggling Conspiracy Exposes Internal Corruption
• In Operation Sohor (2025), MACC arrested military intelligence officers for leaking classified data to smugglers.
• Media reports revealed the syndicate earned RM5 million monthly, with officers receiving RM30,000–RM50,000 per trip.
• The scandal was widely covered, with headlines like “Civil Service Corruption Crisis” and “Where is Akmal Saleh?” fueling public anger.
🧑⚖️ 4. Abuse Cases at Military Institutions
• A 2024 bullying case at Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (UPNM) reignited outrage when a cadet suffered multiple fractures after being stomped by a senior.
• Media coverage highlighted a pattern of hazing and abuse, prompting demands for institutional reform and stricter oversight.
📱 5. Social Media & Grassroots Pressure
• Platforms like Twitter and TikTok have become battlegrounds for public discourse, with hashtags like #ReformATM and #MilitaryTransparency trending during major scandals.
• Independent media and citizen journalists have played a key role in exposing misconduct, bypassing traditional gatekeepers.
🛠️ Impact on Policy & Reform
• The backlash has led to:
o Cancellation of controversial deals
o Promises of procurement reform
o Greater scrutiny of defense budgets and contractor relationships
• However, many Malaysians remain skeptical, citing deep-rooted patronage networks and slow institutional change
💰 1. What Are Progressive Multi-Year Payments?
HapusIn Malondesh defense procurement model:
• Large acquisitions (e.g. ships, aircraft, armored vehicles) are not paid for upfront.
• Instead, the government commits to multi-year installment payments, often spread across 5–10 years.
• Each annual defense budget allocates a portion to these ongoing payments, limiting funds available for new projects.
This structure is meant to ease fiscal pressure, but it creates long-term bottlenecks.
🛑 2. How It Slows Platform Delivery
A. Cash Flow Constraints
• When most of the budget is tied up in legacy payments (e.g. for the Littoral Combat Ship or FA-50 jets), new programs are deferred.
• Even approved platforms face delayed production schedules due to inconsistent or partial payments to contractors.
B. Contractual Fragmentation
• OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) often require milestone-based payments to proceed with manufacturing.
• If Malondesh delays or underpays a milestone, production halts—leading to slippage in delivery timelines.
C. Budget Volatility
• Political transitions or economic downturns (e.g. COVID-19, ringgit depreciation) can cause annual budget cuts, disrupting payment schedules.
• This leads to renegotiations, cost overruns, and sometimes contract termination.
⚓ 3. Real-World Examples
Program Intended Delivery Status Cause of Delay
Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) First ship by 2019 None delivered as of 2025 Payment delays, mismanagement
FA-50 Light Fighters Initial batch by 2024 Slipped to 2026+ Budget phasing, contract finalization
AV8 Gempita IFVs Full fleet by 2020 Still incomplete Staggered payments, local production issues
🔄 4. Systemic Impact
• Capability Gaps: Forces operate with aging platforms while waiting for replacements.
• Operational Risk: Delays in naval and air assets reduce deterrence and readiness.
• Loss of Credibility: OEMs and partners view Malondesh as a high-risk client, demanding stricter payment terms.
💰 1. What Are Progressive Multi-Year Payments?
HapusIn Malondesh defense procurement model:
• Large acquisitions (e.g. ships, aircraft, armored vehicles) are not paid for upfront.
• Instead, the government commits to multi-year installment payments, often spread across 5–10 years.
• Each annual defense budget allocates a portion to these ongoing payments, limiting funds available for new projects.
This structure is meant to ease fiscal pressure, but it creates long-term bottlenecks.
🛑 2. How It Slows Platform Delivery
A. Cash Flow Constraints
• When most of the budget is tied up in legacy payments (e.g. for the Littoral Combat Ship or FA-50 jets), new programs are deferred.
• Even approved platforms face delayed production schedules due to inconsistent or partial payments to contractors.
B. Contractual Fragmentation
• OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) often require milestone-based payments to proceed with manufacturing.
• If Malondesh delays or underpays a milestone, production halts—leading to slippage in delivery timelines.
C. Budget Volatility
• Political transitions or economic downturns (e.g. COVID-19, ringgit depreciation) can cause annual budget cuts, disrupting payment schedules.
• This leads to renegotiations, cost overruns, and sometimes contract termination.
⚓ 3. Real-World Examples
Program Intended Delivery Status Cause of Delay
Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) First ship by 2019 None delivered as of 2025 Payment delays, mismanagement
FA-50 Light Fighters Initial batch by 2024 Slipped to 2026+ Budget phasing, contract finalization
AV8 Gempita IFVs Full fleet by 2020 Still incomplete Staggered payments, local production issues
🔄 4. Systemic Impact
• Capability Gaps: Forces operate with aging platforms while waiting for replacements.
• Operational Risk: Delays in naval and air assets reduce deterrence and readiness.
• Loss of Credibility: OEMs and partners view Malondesh as a high-risk client, demanding stricter payment terms.
Khas untuk geng GORILLA MISKIN.... PROGRES PROJEK ECRL MALAYSIA ya guys..... Bukan seperti projek kereta cepat yang MANGKRAK tu.... 😎😎🇲🇾🇲🇾
BalasHapushttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C1stKAJnzAQ
💰 1. What Are Progressive Multi-Year Payments?
HapusIn Malondesh defense procurement model:
• Large acquisitions (e.g. ships, aircraft, armored vehicles) are not paid for upfront.
• Instead, the government commits to multi-year installment payments, often spread across 5–10 years.
• Each annual defense budget allocates a portion to these ongoing payments, limiting funds available for new projects.
This structure is meant to ease fiscal pressure, but it creates long-term bottlenecks.
🛑 2. How It Slows Platform Delivery
A. Cash Flow Constraints
• When most of the budget is tied up in legacy payments (e.g. for the Littoral Combat Ship or FA-50 jets), new programs are deferred.
• Even approved platforms face delayed production schedules due to inconsistent or partial payments to contractors.
B. Contractual Fragmentation
• OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) often require milestone-based payments to proceed with manufacturing.
• If Malondesh delays or underpays a milestone, production halts—leading to slippage in delivery timelines.
C. Budget Volatility
• Political transitions or economic downturns (e.g. COVID-19, ringgit depreciation) can cause annual budget cuts, disrupting payment schedules.
• This leads to renegotiations, cost overruns, and sometimes contract termination.
⚓ 3. Real-World Examples
Program Intended Delivery Status Cause of Delay
Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) First ship by 2019 None delivered as of 2025 Payment delays, mismanagement
FA-50 Light Fighters Initial batch by 2024 Slipped to 2026+ Budget phasing, contract finalization
AV8 Gempita IFVs Full fleet by 2020 Still incomplete Staggered payments, local production issues
🔄 4. Systemic Impact
• Capability Gaps: Forces operate with aging platforms while waiting for replacements.
• Operational Risk: Delays in naval and air assets reduce deterrence and readiness.
• Loss of Credibility: OEMs and partners view Malondesh as a high-risk client, demanding stricter payment terms.
💰 1. Budget Priorities Skewed Toward Salaries and Pensions
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense, but over 40% of that went to salaries and allowances.
• This leaves a much smaller portion for capital expenditure (CAPEX) like procurement, upgrades, and maintenance.
• The imbalance means aging equipment stays in service longer without proper refurbishment, increasing breakdowns and reducing combat readiness.
🧾 2. Procurement Funding Is Fragmented and Reactive
• The budget for procurement includes progressive payments for ongoing contracts (e.g., FA-50 fighter jets, A400M upgrades, Littoral Combat Ships).
• These payments are pre-committed, leaving little flexibility for new upgrades or emergency repairs.
• Funding for large-scale modernization is often spread across multiple years, making it hard to respond quickly to urgent needs.
📉 3. Currency Depreciation Reduces Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources much of its military equipment from foreign suppliers, and the weakening ringgit erodes the real value of allocated funds.
• Even when budgets increase nominally, the actual capability to purchase spare parts or upgrade systems may remain stagnant or decline.
🧱 4. Political Reluctance to Reallocate Spending
• Successive governments have been unwilling to cut spending elsewhere or reduce manpower to boost defense funding.
• Defense modernization is often deprioritized in favor of social programs, infrastructure, or healthcare.
• This results in a military that is operationally stretched, with outdated platforms and limited upgrade cycles.
🚢 5. Real-World Consequences: Equipment Failures
• A 45-year-old Malondeshn Navy vessel, KD Pendekar, sank during patrol in 2024 due to hull failure, highlighting the dangers of underfunded maintenance.
• Half of the Navy’s 49 ships are operating beyond their serviceable lifespan, according to the Auditor-General.
📊 Summary Table: Why Repairs and Upgrades Are Underfunded
Cause Impact on Military Capability
High Personnel Costs Less funding for equipment upkeep
Fragmented Procurement Budget Delays in modernization and upgrades
Currency Depreciation Reduced ability to buy foreign parts
Political Spending Priorities Defense often sidelined for domestic programs
Aging Fleet and Infrastructure Increased breakdowns and operational risk
💰 1. Budget Priorities Skewed Toward Salaries and Pensions
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense, but over 40% of that went to salaries and allowances.
• This leaves a much smaller portion for capital expenditure (CAPEX) like procurement, upgrades, and maintenance.
• The imbalance means aging equipment stays in service longer without proper refurbishment, increasing breakdowns and reducing combat readiness.
🧾 2. Procurement Funding Is Fragmented and Reactive
• The budget for procurement includes progressive payments for ongoing contracts (e.g., FA-50 fighter jets, A400M upgrades, Littoral Combat Ships).
• These payments are pre-committed, leaving little flexibility for new upgrades or emergency repairs.
• Funding for large-scale modernization is often spread across multiple years, making it hard to respond quickly to urgent needs.
📉 3. Currency Depreciation Reduces Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources much of its military equipment from foreign suppliers, and the weakening ringgit erodes the real value of allocated funds.
• Even when budgets increase nominally, the actual capability to purchase spare parts or upgrade systems may remain stagnant or decline.
🧱 4. Political Reluctance to Reallocate Spending
• Successive governments have been unwilling to cut spending elsewhere or reduce manpower to boost defense funding.
• Defense modernization is often deprioritized in favor of social programs, infrastructure, or healthcare.
• This results in a military that is operationally stretched, with outdated platforms and limited upgrade cycles.
🚢 5. Real-World Consequences: Equipment Failures
• A 45-year-old Malondeshn Navy vessel, KD Pendekar, sank during patrol in 2024 due to hull failure, highlighting the dangers of underfunded maintenance.
• Half of the Navy’s 49 ships are operating beyond their serviceable lifespan, according to the Auditor-General.
📊 Summary Table: Why Repairs and Upgrades Are Underfunded
Cause Impact on Military Capability
High Personnel Costs Less funding for equipment upkeep
Fragmented Procurement Budget Delays in modernization and upgrades
Currency Depreciation Reduced ability to buy foreign parts
Political Spending Priorities Defense often sidelined for domestic programs
Aging Fleet and Infrastructure Increased breakdowns and operational risk
ECRL 2016 $18 bn= RM 55 bn pake Utang 30 Tahun jadi RM140bn...
BalasHapusajegile 3x lipat gaeez bunga/interest aja Ngerih haha!☠️🥶☠️
warganyet 1cc tetap senang Ditipu haha!🤣🍌🤣
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Published October 31, 2016
Updated November 1, 2016
BEIJING — China will build and provide financing for Malaysia’s East Coast Rail Link (ECRL), a ❌️RM55 billion (S$18.3 billion) rail project spanning four states, said a senior Malaysian official on Monday (Oct 31), as Prime Minister Najib Razak arrived in Beijing for a week-long visit.
https://www.todayonline.com/world/asia/china-build-and-finance-msias-s183b-east-coast-rail-link-project
-----
“This railway project is very costly. More than ❌️RM55 billion and it will take us 30 years to repay the loan. We will be saddled with a lot of interest which in the end will amount to ❌️RM140 billion
https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/dr-mahathir-ecrl-project-continue-if-price-right
PROGRES PROJEK ECRL MALAYSIA... 😎😎🇲🇾🇲🇾
BalasHapushttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C1stKAJnzAQ
🧱 1. Weak Implementation of Integrated Logistics Support (ILS)
HapusILS is a structured approach used globally to ensure military assets are supported throughout their lifecycle. In Malondesh:
• The ILS framework is not consistently applied across all branches of the Armed Forces.
• Logistics Support Analysis (LSA), which helps forecast maintenance and supply needs, is underutilized or poorly executed, especially for armored vehicles.
• This leads to inefficient sustainment, meaning equipment can't be reliably maintained or deployed when needed.
🔄 2. Fragmented Logistics Planning Across Services
• The Army, Navy, and Air Force each operate their own logistics systems with limited integration, causing duplication and delays.
• There’s a lack of centralized coordination, which means supplies, spare parts, and maintenance schedules are often mismatched or delayed.
• During joint operations or disaster response, this fragmentation slows down deployment and resupply efforts.
🧠 3. Limited Organizational Learning and Process Capability
• Studies show that the Malondeshn Army struggles with adapting logistics processes to dynamic operational environments.
• There’s insufficient investment in training logisticians and developing agile systems that can respond to fast-changing battlefield conditions.
• Without a culture of continuous improvement, logistics systems remain rigid and outdated.
🛠️ 4. Aging Infrastructure and Supply Chain Bottlenecks
• Warehouses, transport fleets, and IT systems used for logistics are often outdated or underfunded.
• Malondesh broader logistics sector also faces regulatory inconsistencies and economic instability, which spill over into military logistics.
• These bottlenecks reduce the speed and reliability of asset delivery, repairs, and replenishment.
📉 5. Lack of Strategic Logistics Alliances
• Unlike some regional militaries, Malondesh has limited partnerships with private sector logistics providers or international allies.
• This restricts access to advanced supply chain technologies, predictive maintenance tools, and global best practices.
📊 Summary Table: Why Logistics Undermines Sustainment & Reliability
Problem Area Impact on Military Capability
Poor ILS Implementation Unreliable asset maintenance and forecasting
Fragmented Planning Delays in resupply and joint operations
Weak Organizational Learning Inflexible logistics systems
Aging Infrastructure Slow and inefficient supply chains
Lack of Strategic Alliances Limited access to modern logistics solutions
🧱 1. Aging and Inadequate Equipment
Hapus• Many of Malondesh military platforms—especially aircraft, naval vessels, and armored vehicles—are over 30 years old, with limited upgrades.
• This leads to frequent breakdowns, low availability rates, and high maintenance costs.
• For example, the Royal Malondeshn Air Force still operates MiG-29s and F-5s, which are outdated compared to regional counterparts.
💸 2. Budget Allocation Issues
• Malondesh spends around RM15–18 billion annually on defense, but 60–70% of that goes to salaries, pensions, and basic operations.
• This leaves little room for modernization, procurement of new systems, or advanced training.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, meant to boost naval capability, has been plagued by delays and mismanagement, with no ships delivered despite billions spent.
🔧 3. Weak Logistics and Support Systems
• Malondesh lacks a robust Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) system, which is crucial for sustaining equipment over its lifecycle.
• Poor implementation of logistics planning leads to inefficient supply chains, delayed repairs, and low asset readiness.
• Without proper logistics, even well-equipped units struggle to maintain operational tempo.
🧠 4. Training and Doctrine Gaps
• Military exercises are limited in scope and frequency, reducing the ability to simulate real combat scenarios.
• There’s insufficient emphasis on joint and combined operations, which are essential for modern warfare.
• Training doctrines are not fully aligned with emerging threats like cyber warfare, grey-zone conflict, and multi-domain operations.
🧍 5. Human Resource Challenges
• Recruitment is uneven across ethnic groups, and there’s a shortage of personnel with skills in cybersecurity, AI, and electronic warfare.
• Retention is also a problem, especially for highly trained specialists who may leave for better-paying civilian roles.
🧭 6. Strategic and Geopolitical Lag
• Malondesh defense posture has traditionally relied on non-provocative diplomacy, especially in the South China Sea.
• But with rising tensions and assertiveness from regional powers like China, this approach is increasingly seen as insufficient.
• Malondesh risks falling behind countries like Vietnam and the Philippines, which are rapidly modernizing and strengthening alliances.
📉 Summary Table: Key Factors Reducing Operational Capability
Factor Impact on Military Readiness
Aging Equipment Low availability, high maintenance costs
Budget Imbalance Limited modernization and procurement
Weak Logistics Poor sustainment and asset reliability
Training Gaps Inadequate combat preparedness
HR Shortages Skills gap in modern warfare domains
Strategic Lag Vulnerability in regional power dynamics
🛠️ 1. Aging Equipment and Maintenance Issues
Hapus• Many of Malondesh’s military assets—especially aircraft, ships, and armored vehicles—are over 30 years old, leading to frequent breakdowns and reduced operational availability.
• Maintenance is often outsourced to private contractors, which can be cost-effective but also introduces delays and accountability issues.
• Spare parts for legacy systems are hard to source, and upgrades are slow due to budget constraints.
💰 2. Budget Constraints and Spending Inefficiencies
• Although Malondesh spends around USD 4 billion annually on defense, much of this goes to salaries and pensions rather than modernization or training.
• Procurement processes are often delayed or mismanaged, as seen in the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, which has faced years of setbacks.
🧠 3. Limited Training and Exercise Frequency
• Military exercises are crucial for readiness, but Malondesh conducts fewer joint and combined drills compared to regional peers.
• Training programs are not always aligned with modern doctrines like Multi-Domain Operations (MDO), which integrate cyber, space, and information warfare.
• The lack of realistic, high-intensity training limits the military’s ability to respond to hybrid or asymmetric threats.
🧍 4. Human Resource Challenges
• Recruitment and retention are uneven across ethnic groups. Non-Malay youth, for example, face barriers to joining due to cultural, linguistic, and perception issues.
• There’s also a shortage of personnel trained in cybersecurity, AI, and electronic warfare, which are critical for modern readiness.
🧭 5. Strategic and Doctrinal Gaps
• Malondesh’s defense strategy has been slow to adapt to multi-domain threats, such as cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and maritime incursions.
• The absence of a unified doctrine across the Army, Navy, and Air Force leads to fragmented planning and poor inter-service coordination.
🧃 6. Public Perception and Political Will
• Public sensitivity and support for the military are lower than for other institutions like the police or immigration services.
• This affects recruitment, funding priorities, and political momentum for reform.
🧩 Summary of Key Factors
Factor Impact on Readiness
Aging Equipment Reduces operational capability
Budget Allocation Limits modernization and training
Training Deficiencies Weakens combat preparedness
Recruitment Challenges Shrinks talent pool and diversity
Strategic Gaps Poor adaptation to modern threats
Public Support Low political pressure for reform
YANG JELAS JILAT PANTAT TRUMP TAPI BELUM BERSIH KENA TEMPELANG 240 BILLION YA MALONDESH TOLOL DAN MISKIN 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapuseittt kereta cepat kita HST WHOOSH uda selesai dari 2023...mantap haha!👍🦾👍
BalasHapus⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://youtube.com/watch?v=n2SwnzA31uU&pp=ygUWd2hvb3NoIHRyYWluIGluZG9uZXNpYQ%3D%3D
lah ECRL...delay delay...last last kensel haha!🤣🤣🤣
Utang 30 tahun bunga 3x lipat..dari rm 55bn ke rm140bn...fanasss🔥🔥🔥
eitt ituw kat tun m haha!👍👍👍
Mari kita lihat panjang landasan ECRL ya.... Sepanjang 665KM....😎😎
BalasHapusProjek ECRL sejauh 665 kilometer akan merentasi negeri-negeri Pantai Timur iaitu Kelantan, Terengganu dan Pahang sebelum menghubungkan Selangor di Pantai Barat Semenanjung Malaysia.
💸 1. POTENTIALLY HIGHER LONG-TERM COSTS
Hapus• Critics argue that leasing may cost more than outright purchase over time.
• For example, Poland purchased 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing 28 helicopters for RM16.5 billion (~US$3.5 billion) over 15 years.
• Leasing includes bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance), but the total cost may exceed the value of the helicopters themselves.
🕵️♂️ 2. Transparency & Procurement Concerns
• The deal was signed with Weststar Aviation, a private firm owned by a prominent businessman, raising questions about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals in Malaysia’s defense procurement—like the LCS and MD530G helicopter failures—have made the public wary of opaque contracts and lack of competitive bidding.
🛠️ 3. Limited Sovereignty Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract, which may limit:
o Upgrades or modifications
o Deployment flexibility
o Integration with other military systems
• This could hinder Malaysia’s ability to adapt the fleet to evolving threats or mission needs.
🧭 4. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Purchasing helicopters could have supported local assembly, maintenance, and technology transfer, boosting Malaysia’s defense industry.
• Leasing centralizes operations under a private provider, reducing opportunities for domestic capability development.
⚠️ 5. Risk of Contractual Disputes or Service Interruptions
• If the leasing company fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), Malaysia may face operational gaps.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay missions or compromise national security.
🗣️ Public & Political Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have called the deal overpriced and strategically flawed, urging a review of procurement practices.
• The Prime Minister defended the lease as a way to avoid maintenance burdens, but critics say it reflects short-term budgeting over long-term planning.
🕒 Missed Timelines
HapusThese refer to delays in procurement, deployment, or modernization of military assets and infrastructure:
• Delayed Equipment Acquisition: Major programs like the procurement of Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) have faced years-long delays, with none delivered despite contracts signed over a decade ago.
• Slow Modernization Cycles: Malondesh defense planning often suffers from bureaucratic inertia and inconsistent funding, causing long gaps between planning and execution.
• Strategic Planning Lags: The implementation of the 4th Dimension Malondeshn Armed Forces Strategic Plan (4D MAF) has been slower than anticipated, limiting the pace of transformation.
⚔️ Capability Gaps
These are areas where Malondesh military lacks sufficient resources, technology, or readiness:
1. Aging Equipment
• Over 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force are more than 30 years old.
• This includes outdated fighter jets, naval vessels, and armored vehicles, many of which are no longer combat-effective.
2. AI and Cyber Warfare Deficiencies
• Malondesh lags behind in artificial intelligence (AI) integration for defense, especially in surveillance, autonomous systems, and cyber warfare.
• The shortage of skilled professionals and limited R&D investment exacerbates this gap.
3. Logistics and Mobility
• Limited infrastructure for rapid deployment and logistics resilience, especially in East Malondesh (Sabah and Sarawak), hinders operational flexibility.
• Lack of pre-positioned supplies and forward-operating bases reduces response time in crisis scenarios.
4. Force Readiness
• The military remains oriented toward peacetime deterrence rather than high-intensity or hybrid conflict readiness.
• There’s a need for modular, rapid-reaction units capable of operating in grey-zone environments like the South China Sea.
5. Inter-Service Rivalry and Planning Gaps
• Internal competition between branches of the military has slowed unified capability development.
• Strategic planning lacks cohesion and clear national security alignment, making long-term modernization difficult.
💱 Currency Depreciation: Strategic Impact
Hapus1. Import-Heavy Defence Procurement
• Malondesh imports most of its advanced military equipment—jets, radars, missiles, naval systems—from countries like the U.S., France, South Korea, and Russia.
• When the Malondeshn ringgit weakens, the cost of these imports rises sharply, even if the nominal budget stays the same.
• Example: Payments for the Airbus A400M, FA-50 jets, and Littoral Combat Ships became more expensive due to ringgit depreciation.
2. Progressive Payment Burden
• Defence contracts often involve multi-year payments in foreign currencies.
• A depreciating ringgit means Malondesh pays more each year for the same asset, squeezing future budgets.
• This affects not just procurement, but also spare parts, training, and software licensing.
3. Reduced Purchasing Power
• Even with increased defence allocations (e.g. RM19 billion in 2024), the real value of that budget is eroded.
• Malondesh ends up buying fewer units, delaying upgrades, or scaling down specifications.
📉 Fiscal Constraints: Structural Challenges
1. Shrinking Revenue Base
• Malondesh’s traditional revenue sources—oil, gas, and palm oil—have faced volatility.
• Combined with rising subsidies and social spending, this leaves limited fiscal space for defence.
2. High Personnel & Operational Costs
• Over 60–70% of the defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, housing, and maintenance.
• Capital expenditure (for new systems) is often less than 30%, making modernization difficult.
3. Competing National Priorities
• Defence competes with education, healthcare, and infrastructure for funding.
• Political leaders are often reluctant to increase defence spending due to low public pressure and non-confrontational foreign policy.
4. Outsourcing Limitations
• Malondesh has outsourced many military support functions since the 1970s to save costs.
• However, poor governance and weak oversight have undermined efficiency, leading to waste and capability gaps.
📊 Summary Table: Impact of Currency & Fiscal Constraints
Issue Effect on Military Capability
Ringgit depreciation Higher cost of imports, reduced asset quantity
Multi-year foreign contracts Budget erosion over time
Shrinking revenue base Limited capital for modernization
High personnel costs Low investment in new tech and platforms
Outsourcing inefficiencies Poor readiness, fragmented logistics
Apanya mangkrak...HST Whoosh kita selesai lamaaaaa...2023 woii
BalasHapusPertamaxxx se Asean haha!🤗👍🤗
lah seblah ECRL kreta lamban ajah lama..
Delay delay Kensel macam HST kl-SG haha!😋😋😋
665 kilometer pendek sekali di sini BANYAK 2x lipat lebih panjang haha!🤗🤗🤗
BalasHapusEcrl kereta lamban bayar mahal, Utang 30 tahun bunga Besar 3x lipat...fiks kena debt trap haha!🤣🤣🤣
“This railway project is very costly. More than ❌️RM55 billion and it will take us 30 years to repay the loan. We will be saddled with a lot of interest which in the end will amount to ❌️RM140 billion
BalasHapushttps://theedgemalaysia.com/article/dr-mahathir-ecrl-project-continue-if-price-right
------
warganyet PANIK🥶ECRL murah aja 30 tahun UTANG, dari 55 ke 140 bn
ehh ituw kalo lancar..kalo rugi bisa 300 tahun Ngutang haha!😆😆😆
Jom kita lihat pula jarak kereta cepat MANGKRAK.. hanya 143KM je... 😆😆😆🤣🤣
BalasHapusKereta Cepat Whoosh memiliki jalur sepanjang 142,3 km dengan 13 terowongan dan akan melayani 4 Stasiun yaitu Halim, Karawang, Padalarang, dan Tegalluar.
💸 1. LONG-TERM FINANCIAL BURDEN
Hapus• Malaysia’s RM16.5 billion lease for 28 helicopters over 15 years may cost more than outright purchase.
• For comparison, Poland bought 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing fewer units for nearly double the price.
• Critics argue that bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance) inflate the cost, creating a hidden financial strain over time.
🛠️ 2. Limited Control Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract.
• This restricts Malaysia’s ability to:
o Upgrade systems
o Reconfigure for new missions
o Integrate with other platforms
• Strategic flexibility is compromised, especially in emergencies or regional conflicts.
🧭 3. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Leasing bypasses local manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance, which could have boosted Malaysia’s defense industry.
• No significant technology transfer or job creation occurs under private leasing arrangements.
• This weakens Malaysia’s long-term goal of defense self-reliance.
🕵️♂️ 4. Procurement Transparency Risks
• The deal was awarded to Weststar Aviation, a private firm, raising concerns about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals (e.g., LCS and MD530G) have made the public wary of opaque procurement processes.
• Leasing may reduce upfront corruption risks, but it doesn’t eliminate contractual opacity.
⚠️ 5. Strategic Dependency
• Malaysia becomes dependent on private contractors for asset readiness and maintenance.
• If the contractor fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), national security could be compromised.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay operations or ground critical assets.
🗣️ Political & Public Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have criticized the lease as overpriced and strategically flawed.
• The government defends it as a way to avoid upfront costs and ensure faster deployment, but the debate continues in Parliament and among analysts
💱 Currency Depreciation: Strategic Impact
Hapus1. Import-Heavy Defence Procurement
• Malondesh imports most of its advanced military equipment—jets, radars, missiles, naval systems—from countries like the U.S., France, South Korea, and Russia.
• When the Malondeshn ringgit weakens, the cost of these imports rises sharply, even if the nominal budget stays the same.
• Example: Payments for the Airbus A400M, FA-50 jets, and Littoral Combat Ships became more expensive due to ringgit depreciation.
2. Progressive Payment Burden
• Defence contracts often involve multi-year payments in foreign currencies.
• A depreciating ringgit means Malondesh pays more each year for the same asset, squeezing future budgets.
• This affects not just procurement, but also spare parts, training, and software licensing.
3. Reduced Purchasing Power
• Even with increased defence allocations (e.g. RM19 billion in 2024), the real value of that budget is eroded.
• Malondesh ends up buying fewer units, delaying upgrades, or scaling down specifications.
📉 Fiscal Constraints: Structural Challenges
1. Shrinking Revenue Base
• Malondesh’s traditional revenue sources—oil, gas, and palm oil—have faced volatility.
• Combined with rising subsidies and social spending, this leaves limited fiscal space for defence.
2. High Personnel & Operational Costs
• Over 60–70% of the defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, housing, and maintenance.
• Capital expenditure (for new systems) is often less than 30%, making modernization difficult.
3. Competing National Priorities
• Defence competes with education, healthcare, and infrastructure for funding.
• Political leaders are often reluctant to increase defence spending due to low public pressure and non-confrontational foreign policy.
4. Outsourcing Limitations
• Malondesh has outsourced many military support functions since the 1970s to save costs.
• However, poor governance and weak oversight have undermined efficiency, leading to waste and capability gaps.
📊 Summary Table: Impact of Currency & Fiscal Constraints
Issue Effect on Military Capability
Ringgit depreciation Higher cost of imports, reduced asset quantity
Multi-year foreign contracts Budget erosion over time
Shrinking revenue base Limited capital for modernization
High personnel costs Low investment in new tech and platforms
Outsourcing inefficiencies Poor readiness, fragmented logistics
1. Overweight on Operating Expenditure
Hapus• Over 40% of Malondesh defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, and allowances.
• This leaves limited room for capital expenditure (procurement, upgrades, R&D).
• Example: In 2024, RM8.2 billion was allocated for personnel costs, while only RM5.71 billion went to procurement.
2. Fragmented Procurement Planning
• The Ministry of Defence lacks a clear multi-year procurement roadmap.
• Funding is often allocated year-to-year, making it hard to commit to long-term modernization projects.
• This leads to delays, cost overruns, and underutilized platforms (e.g. the Littoral Combat Ship fiasco).
3. Political Hesitation to Rebalance
• Successive governments have been unwilling to cut personnel costs or restructure the armed forces.
• Reducing manpower or retiring outdated equipment is politically sensitive, especially with veterans and civil service unions.
4. Currency Depreciation & Import Dependence
• Malondesh imports most of its defence equipment.
• The weak ringgit erodes purchasing power, so even increased budgets don’t translate into real capability gains.
5. Multi-Year Commitments Hidden in Annual Budgets
• Annual allocations include progressive payments for past procurements (e.g. FA-50 jets, A400M upgrades).
• These payments crowd out new investments, creating the illusion of fresh funding when it’s actually backlog servicing.
📊 Budget Allocation Snapshot (2024)
Category Allocation (RM) % of Total Budget
Personnel Costs 8.2 billion ~41%
Procurement 5.71 billion ~29%
Operations & Training ~3.5 billion ~18%
Miscellaneous ~2.3 billion ~12%
🔍 Consequences of the Chronic Allocation Problem
• Delayed modernization: RMN, RMAF, and Army struggle to replace aging platforms.
• Capability gaps: Limited readiness for maritime threats, cyber warfare, and regional deterrence.
• Low regional competitiveness: Malondesh lags behind Indonesia, Singapore, and Vietnam in defence tech and force structure
BEZA KASTA.... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusMALAYSIA ECRL - 665KM
INDIANESIA WHOOSH - 143KM
💸 1. LONG-TERM FINANCIAL BURDEN
Hapus• Malaysia’s RM16.5 billion lease for 28 helicopters over 15 years may cost more than outright purchase.
• For comparison, Poland bought 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing fewer units for nearly double the price.
• Critics argue that bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance) inflate the cost, creating a hidden financial strain over time.
🛠️ 2. Limited Control Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract.
• This restricts Malaysia’s ability to:
o Upgrade systems
o Reconfigure for new missions
o Integrate with other platforms
• Strategic flexibility is compromised, especially in emergencies or regional conflicts.
🧭 3. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Leasing bypasses local manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance, which could have boosted Malaysia’s defense industry.
• No significant technology transfer or job creation occurs under private leasing arrangements.
• This weakens Malaysia’s long-term goal of defense self-reliance.
🕵️♂️ 4. Procurement Transparency Risks
• The deal was awarded to Weststar Aviation, a private firm, raising concerns about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals (e.g., LCS and MD530G) have made the public wary of opaque procurement processes.
• Leasing may reduce upfront corruption risks, but it doesn’t eliminate contractual opacity.
⚠️ 5. Strategic Dependency
• Malaysia becomes dependent on private contractors for asset readiness and maintenance.
• If the contractor fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), national security could be compromised.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay operations or ground critical assets.
🗣️ Political & Public Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have criticized the lease as overpriced and strategically flawed.
• The government defends it as a way to avoid upfront costs and ensure faster deployment, but the debate continues in Parliament and among analysts
🛡️ Why Malondesh Lags Behind in Defence Tech & Force Structure
Hapus1. Limited Defence Budget & Allocation Inefficiency
• Malondesh’s defence budget is lower than Indonesia and Singapore, and a large portion goes to personnel costs, not modernization.
• In contrast:
o Indonesia: $10.6 billion budget (2025), focused on maritime security and modernization
o Singapore: $15 billion budget, with 4.9% of GDP allocated to defence—the highest in ASEAN
o Vietnam: Prioritizes coastal defence with diversified procurement from the U.S., South Korea, and Israel
2. Outdated Equipment & Slow Modernization
• Malondesh still operates legacy platforms like MiG-29s (retired), aging Scorpene submarines, and delayed Littoral Combat Ships.
• Meanwhile:
o Indonesia is acquiring Rafale jets, Scorpène-class submarines, and expanding naval bases
o Singapore has F-35B stealth fighters, advanced UAVs, and integrated cyber warfare units
o Vietnam is modernizing its Soviet-era arsenal and investing in coastal missile systems
3. Force Structure Limitations
• Malondesh’s armed forces are fragmented and lack joint operational doctrine.
• Singapore’s SAF is highly integrated, with tri-service coordination and advanced simulation training.
• Indonesia and Vietnam maintain large active personnel (400,000 and 600,000 respectively), while Malondesh has ~110,000 with limited reserve depth1
4. Strategic Doctrine & Regional Role
• Malondesh’s defence posture is non-confrontational, focused on internal security and humanitarian missions.
• In contrast:
o Indonesia asserts maritime dominance in the South China Sea and Malacca Strait.
o Vietnam maintains a deterrence posture against China, especially in the Spratly Islands.
o Singapore positions itself as a technological leader and regional training hub.
📊 Comparative Snapshot (2025)
Country Defence Budget Key Assets Strategic Focus
🇲🇾 Malondesh ~$5.7B FA-50 jets, LMS Batch 2 Internal security, HADR
🇮🇩 Indonesia $10.6B Rafale jets, submarines Maritime security, deterrence
🇸🇬 Singapore $15B F-35B, cyber units, UAVs Tech superiority, joint ops
🇻🇳 Vietnam ~$6.5B Coastal missiles, Su-30MK2 China deterrence, coastal ops
What Are Malondesh Force Structure Limitations?
Hapus1. Small Active Force Size
• Malondesh has ~113,000 active personnel and ~51,600 reserves.
• Compared to regional peers like Indonesia (~400,000) and Vietnam (~600,000), Malondesh manpower is modest.
• This limits its ability to sustain multi-domain operations or respond to simultaneous threats across Peninsular and East Malondesh.
2. Fragmented Tri-Service Coordination
• The Malondeshn Army, Navy, and Air Force operate with limited joint doctrine and interoperability.
• There’s no unified Joint Operations Command, which hampers integrated responses in complex scenarios (e.g. amphibious landings, cyber warfare).
• Exercises like CARAT and Bersama Shield help, but internal coordination remains weak.
3. Lack of Force Projection Capability
• Malondesh lacks long-range strategic assets:
o No aircraft carriers, heavy bombers, or ballistic missile systems
o Limited aerial refueling and sealift capacity
• This restricts Malondesh ability to deploy forces beyond its borders or sustain operations in contested zones like the South China Sea.
4. Overreliance on Legacy Platforms
• Many platforms are aging or obsolete, such as:
o MiG-29s (retired), F/A-18Ds (limited numbers), and Scorpene submarines (aging)
• Procurement delays (e.g. Littoral Combat Ships) have stalled modernization
• New acquisitions like FA-50 jets and LMS Batch 2 are promising but not yet integrated into full operational doctrine
5. Budget Allocation Imbalance
• Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs
• Capital expenditure for modernization is squeezed, limiting upgrades and new systems
• Multi-year commitments (e.g. aircraft payments) crowd out fresh investments
6. Limited Indigenous Defence Industry
• Malondesh domestic defence production focuses on maintenance, small arms, and vehicles
• It lacks capacity for advanced systems like missiles, radar, or naval combatants
• This increases dependence on foreign suppliers and slows force structure evolution
📊 Summary Table: Key Force Structure Gaps
Limitation Impact on Capability
Small active force Limited operational depth
Weak joint command Poor tri-service coordination
No strategic assets No regional power projection
Aging platforms Reduced combat readiness
Budget imbalance Slow modernization, procurement delays
Weak defence industry High import dependence, slow tech adoption
BEZA KASTA.... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusMALAYSIA ECRL - 665KM
INDIANESIA WHOOSH - 143KM
📣 1. PROCUREMENT SCANDALS FUEL PUBLIC DISTRUST
HapusLittoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal
• The RM9 billion LCS project became a lightning rod for criticism when no ships were delivered despite billions spent.
• Media outlets and the Public Accounts Committee exposed mismanagement, cost overruns, and non-compliance, triggering public outrage and parliamentary scrutiny.
MD530G Helicopter Failure
• Malaysia paid RM112 million upfront for six helicopters that were never delivered on time.
• The media labeled it a “ghost fleet,” and citizens questioned the lack of accountability.
👑 2. Royal Intervention Amplifies Criticism
• King Sultan Ibrahim, also Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, publicly condemned the procurement of 35-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, calling them “flying coffins.”
• His rebuke—“If you don’t know the price, ask me first”—went viral, reinforcing public frustration over opaque and overpriced deals.
🕵️♂️ 3. Smuggling Conspiracy Exposes Internal Corruption
• In Operation Sohor (2025), MACC arrested military intelligence officers for leaking classified data to smugglers.
• Media reports revealed the syndicate earned RM5 million monthly, with officers receiving RM30,000–RM50,000 per trip.
• The scandal was widely covered, with headlines like “Civil Service Corruption Crisis” and “Where is Akmal Saleh?” fueling public anger.
🧑⚖️ 4. Abuse Cases at Military Institutions
• A 2024 bullying case at Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (UPNM) reignited outrage when a cadet suffered multiple fractures after being stomped by a senior.
• Media coverage highlighted a pattern of hazing and abuse, prompting demands for institutional reform and stricter oversight.
📱 5. Social Media & Grassroots Pressure
• Platforms like Twitter and TikTok have become battlegrounds for public discourse, with hashtags like #ReformATM and #MilitaryTransparency trending during major scandals.
• Independent media and citizen journalists have played a key role in exposing misconduct, bypassing traditional gatekeepers.
🛠️ Impact on Policy & Reform
• The backlash has led to:
o Cancellation of controversial deals
o Promises of procurement reform
o Greater scrutiny of defense budgets and contractor relationships
• However, many Malaysians remain skeptical, citing deep-rooted patronage networks and slow institutional change
🛠️ What Does “Legacy Platforms” Mean?
HapusLegacy platforms refer to aging military equipment—aircraft, ships, vehicles, and systems—that are:
• Outdated in technology
• Costly to maintain
• Operationally limited in modern combat scenarios
Malondesh continues to operate many such platforms across its armed services.
🔍 Why Malondesh Overrelies on Legacy Platforms
1. Budget Constraints & Prioritization Gaps
• Defence spending has never been a top priority in Malondesh’s national budget.
• Most funds go to personnel costs, leaving little for capital upgrades.
• Modernization plans are often delayed or cancelled due to economic pressures.
2. Delayed Procurement Cycles
• Example: The MiG-29N jets, delivered in 1995, were supposed to retire by 2010. But due to budget issues, their service was extended indefinitely.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, meant to replace aging naval assets, has faced years of delay, leaving the Navy reliant on older patrol vessels.
3. Fragmented Modernization Strategy
• Malondesh lacks a cohesive long-term procurement roadmap.
• Acquisitions are often piecemeal, reactive, and politically driven.
• This leads to a mix of platforms from Russia, the U.S., France, and China, complicating logistics and interoperability.
4. Maintenance Burden
• Legacy systems require frequent repairs, spare parts, and specialized technicians.
• Example: Malondesh’s fleet includes C-130 Hercules from the 1970s and CN-235s from the early 2000s.
• These platforms consume budget without delivering modern capability.
5. Capability Gaps
• Malondesh’s Air Force can only cover one-third of its territory with current aircraft.
• The Navy lacks sufficient sealift, anti-submarine warfare, and maritime surveillance assets.
• The Army relies on older armored vehicles with limited protection and mobility.
📊 Examples of Legacy Platforms Still in Use
Platform Service Branch Year Introduced Status
MiG-29N Fulcrum Air Force 1995 Retired (late)
F/A-18D Hornet Air Force 1997 Still active
C-130 Hercules Air Force 1970s–1990s Operational
Scorpene Submarines Navy 2009 Aging, limited fleet
Condor APCs Army 1980s Still in service
⚠️ Strategic Risks
• Reduced deterrence in the South China Sea
• Limited interoperability with allies
• High lifecycle costs without capability returns
• Vulnerability to modern threats like drones, cyber warfare, and precision strikes
🔍 Why Malondesh Deterrence Is Reduced
Hapus1. Limited Military Capabilities
• Malondesh lacks strategic assets like long-range missiles, stealth aircraft, or advanced naval platforms.
• Its air force has only 18 F/A-18Ds and is just beginning to induct FA-50 light fighters, which are not deterrent-grade.
• The Navy’s delayed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program and aging submarines weaken maritime deterrence.
2. Fragmented Force Structure
• The armed forces operate in silos, with weak joint command and coordination.
• This reduces operational effectiveness in multi-domain scenarios like amphibious defense or cyber warfare.
3. Budget Constraints
• Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs, leaving little for modernization.
• Malondesh defence spending is ~1% of GDP, far below regional peers like Singapore (~4.9%).
4. Technological Gaps
• Malondesh defence tech lags behind in:
o Cyber warfare
o Electronic warfare
o Unmanned systems
• This limits its ability to counter modern threats like drones, grey-zone tactics, and hybrid warfare.
5. Geostrategic Vulnerabilities
• Malondesh sits near critical maritime chokepoints: the Strait of Malacca and South China Sea.
• Chinese Coast Guard incursions near Sarawak and airspace violations in 2021 exposed Malondesh inability to respond decisively.
6. Diplomatic Ambiguity
• Malondesh non-confrontational foreign policy avoids hard deterrence postures.
• While it promotes regional peace, this can be perceived as strategic passivity, reducing deterrence credibility.
📊 Summary Table: Key Deterrence Weaknesses
Factor Impact on Deterrence
Limited strategic assets Weak denial and punishment capability
Budget imbalance Slow modernization, poor readiness
Tech lag Vulnerable to modern threats
Weak joint ops Ineffective multi-domain response
Passive diplomacy Low credibility in threat signaling
💸 1. LONG-TERM FINANCIAL BURDEN
BalasHapus• Malaysia’s RM16.5 billion lease for 28 helicopters over 15 years may cost more than outright purchase.
• For comparison, Poland bought 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing fewer units for nearly double the price.
• Critics argue that bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance) inflate the cost, creating a hidden financial strain over time.
🛠️ 2. Limited Control Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract.
• This restricts Malaysia’s ability to:
o Upgrade systems
o Reconfigure for new missions
o Integrate with other platforms
• Strategic flexibility is compromised, especially in emergencies or regional conflicts.
🧭 3. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Leasing bypasses local manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance, which could have boosted Malaysia’s defense industry.
• No significant technology transfer or job creation occurs under private leasing arrangements.
• This weakens Malaysia’s long-term goal of defense self-reliance.
🕵️♂️ 4. Procurement Transparency Risks
• The deal was awarded to Weststar Aviation, a private firm, raising concerns about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals (e.g., LCS and MD530G) have made the public wary of opaque procurement processes.
• Leasing may reduce upfront corruption risks, but it doesn’t eliminate contractual opacity.
⚠️ 5. Strategic Dependency
• Malaysia becomes dependent on private contractors for asset readiness and maintenance.
• If the contractor fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), national security could be compromised.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay operations or ground critical assets.
🗣️ Political & Public Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have criticized the lease as overpriced and strategically flawed.
• The government defends it as a way to avoid upfront costs and ensure faster deployment, but the debate continues in Parliament and among analysts
💸 1. POTENTIALLY HIGHER LONG-TERM COSTS
BalasHapus• Critics argue that leasing may cost more than outright purchase over time.
• For example, Poland purchased 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing 28 helicopters for RM16.5 billion (~US$3.5 billion) over 15 years.
• Leasing includes bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance), but the total cost may exceed the value of the helicopters themselves.
🕵️♂️ 2. Transparency & Procurement Concerns
• The deal was signed with Weststar Aviation, a private firm owned by a prominent businessman, raising questions about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals in Malaysia’s defense procurement—like the LCS and MD530G helicopter failures—have made the public wary of opaque contracts and lack of competitive bidding.
🛠️ 3. Limited Sovereignty Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract, which may limit:
o Upgrades or modifications
o Deployment flexibility
o Integration with other military systems
• This could hinder Malaysia’s ability to adapt the fleet to evolving threats or mission needs.
🧭 4. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Purchasing helicopters could have supported local assembly, maintenance, and technology transfer, boosting Malaysia’s defense industry.
• Leasing centralizes operations under a private provider, reducing opportunities for domestic capability development.
⚠️ 5. Risk of Contractual Disputes or Service Interruptions
• If the leasing company fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), Malaysia may face operational gaps.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay missions or compromise national security.
🗣️ Public & Political Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have called the deal overpriced and strategically flawed, urging a review of procurement practices.
• The Prime Minister defended the lease as a way to avoid maintenance burdens, but critics say it reflects short-term budgeting over long-term planning.
jalur rel terpanjang se kawasan haha!👍🔥👍
BalasHapusP. Sulawesi =109 km
P. Sumatera = 1863 km
P. Jawa = 4882 km
lah seblah ituw pendek saja, uda ditipu 30 tahun Utang kalo lancar haha!🤣🤣🤣
ehh rm 55 ke 140 bn 3x lipat..modal dengkul ini mah haha!🤪🤥🤪
---------
Indonesia punya 6.927 km jalur kereta api aktif per 2024
https://goodstats.id/infographic/indonesia-miliki-jalur-ka-terpanjang-di-asean-LDlDy
📣 1. PROCUREMENT SCANDALS FUEL PUBLIC DISTRUST
BalasHapusLittoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal
• The RM9 billion LCS project became a lightning rod for criticism when no ships were delivered despite billions spent.
• Media outlets and the Public Accounts Committee exposed mismanagement, cost overruns, and non-compliance, triggering public outrage and parliamentary scrutiny.
MD530G Helicopter Failure
• Malaysia paid RM112 million upfront for six helicopters that were never delivered on time.
• The media labeled it a “ghost fleet,” and citizens questioned the lack of accountability.
👑 2. Royal Intervention Amplifies Criticism
• King Sultan Ibrahim, also Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, publicly condemned the procurement of 35-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, calling them “flying coffins.”
• His rebuke—“If you don’t know the price, ask me first”—went viral, reinforcing public frustration over opaque and overpriced deals.
🕵️♂️ 3. Smuggling Conspiracy Exposes Internal Corruption
• In Operation Sohor (2025), MACC arrested military intelligence officers for leaking classified data to smugglers.
• Media reports revealed the syndicate earned RM5 million monthly, with officers receiving RM30,000–RM50,000 per trip.
• The scandal was widely covered, with headlines like “Civil Service Corruption Crisis” and “Where is Akmal Saleh?” fueling public anger.
🧑⚖️ 4. Abuse Cases at Military Institutions
• A 2024 bullying case at Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (UPNM) reignited outrage when a cadet suffered multiple fractures after being stomped by a senior.
• Media coverage highlighted a pattern of hazing and abuse, prompting demands for institutional reform and stricter oversight.
📱 5. Social Media & Grassroots Pressure
• Platforms like Twitter and TikTok have become battlegrounds for public discourse, with hashtags like #ReformATM and #MilitaryTransparency trending during major scandals.
• Independent media and citizen journalists have played a key role in exposing misconduct, bypassing traditional gatekeepers.
🛠️ Impact on Policy & Reform
• The backlash has led to:
o Cancellation of controversial deals
o Promises of procurement reform
o Greater scrutiny of defense budgets and contractor relationships
• However, many Malaysians remain skeptical, citing deep-rooted patronage networks and slow institutional change
💸 1. LONG-TERM FINANCIAL BURDEN
BalasHapus• Malaysia’s RM16.5 billion lease for 28 helicopters over 15 years may cost more than outright purchase.
• For comparison, Poland bought 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing fewer units for nearly double the price.
• Critics argue that bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance) inflate the cost, creating a hidden financial strain over time.
🛠️ 2. Limited Control Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract.
• This restricts Malaysia’s ability to:
o Upgrade systems
o Reconfigure for new missions
o Integrate with other platforms
• Strategic flexibility is compromised, especially in emergencies or regional conflicts.
🧭 3. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Leasing bypasses local manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance, which could have boosted Malaysia’s defense industry.
• No significant technology transfer or job creation occurs under private leasing arrangements.
• This weakens Malaysia’s long-term goal of defense self-reliance.
🕵️♂️ 4. Procurement Transparency Risks
• The deal was awarded to Weststar Aviation, a private firm, raising concerns about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals (e.g., LCS and MD530G) have made the public wary of opaque procurement processes.
• Leasing may reduce upfront corruption risks, but it doesn’t eliminate contractual opacity.
⚠️ 5. Strategic Dependency
• Malaysia becomes dependent on private contractors for asset readiness and maintenance.
• If the contractor fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), national security could be compromised.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay operations or ground critical assets.
🗣️ Political & Public Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have criticized the lease as overpriced and strategically flawed.
• The government defends it as a way to avoid upfront costs and ensure faster deployment, but the debate continues in Parliament and among analysts
💸 1. POTENTIALLY HIGHER LONG-TERM COSTS
• Critics argue that leasing may cost more than outright purchase over time.
• For example, Poland purchased 32 AW149 helicopters for US$1.83 billion, while Malaysia is leasing 28 helicopters for RM16.5 billion (~US$3.5 billion) over 15 years.
• Leasing includes bundled services (maintenance, training, insurance), but the total cost may exceed the value of the helicopters themselves.
🕵️♂️ 2. Transparency & Procurement Concerns
• The deal was signed with Weststar Aviation, a private firm owned by a prominent businessman, raising questions about middlemen and lobbying.
• Past scandals in Malaysia’s defense procurement—like the LCS and MD530G helicopter failures—have made the public wary of opaque contracts and lack of competitive bidding.
🛠️ 3. Limited Sovereignty Over Assets
• Leased helicopters are not fully owned until the end of the contract, which may limit:
o Upgrades or modifications
o Deployment flexibility
o Integration with other military systems
• This could hinder Malaysia’s ability to adapt the fleet to evolving threats or mission needs.
🧭 4. Missed Opportunity for Local Industry Growth
• Purchasing helicopters could have supported local assembly, maintenance, and technology transfer, boosting Malaysia’s defense industry.
• Leasing centralizes operations under a private provider, reducing opportunities for domestic capability development.
⚠️ 5. Risk of Contractual Disputes or Service Interruptions
• If the leasing company fails to meet service-level agreements (e.g., 85% fleet availability), Malaysia may face operational gaps.
• Legal or financial disputes could delay missions or compromise national security.
🗣️ Public & Political Backlash
• Opposition leaders and defense experts have called the deal overpriced and strategically flawed, urging a review of procurement practices.
• The Prime Minister defended the lease as a way to avoid maintenance burdens, but critics say it reflects short-term budgeting over long-term planning.
🛠️ WHAT “OUTDATED” REALLY MEANS
BalasHapusOutdated systems refer to:
• Sensors that lack modern tracking, targeting, and surveillance capabilities
• Weapons with limited range, accuracy, and compatibility with newer platforms
• Command-and-control systems that cannot integrate with digital battlefield networks
🚢 Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN)
• 28 ships are over 40 years old, including Fast Attack Craft and patrol vessels.
• Many vessels still use analog radar systems, manual fire-control systems, and obsolete sonar.
• These systems struggle to detect modern threats like stealth submarines or drones.
• Maintenance costs are skyrocketing, and spare parts are often unavailable or discontinued.
🛩️ Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF)
• Older aircraft like the MiG-29N (retired) and F/A-18D Hornets still rely on legacy avionics.
• Limited electronic warfare capabilities and outdated targeting pods reduce effectiveness in modern air combat.
• Poor interoperability with newer aircraft and NATO-standard systems.
🪖 Malondeshn Army
• Ground vehicles, including legacy APCs and tanks, use basic optical sights and manual targeting systems.
• Many artillery units lack GPS-guided fire control, making precision strikes difficult.
• Communication systems are often analog or semi-digital, limiting coordination in joint operations.
⚠️ Consequences of Technological Lag
• Reduced combat effectiveness in high-tech warfare environments
• Increased vulnerability to cyber attacks and electronic jamming
• Limited participation in multinational exercises and peacekeeping missions
• Higher risk to personnel due to unreliable systems, as seen in the 2025 commando tragedy linked to aging gear
🧩 1. COMPLEX & OPAQUE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
BalasHapus• The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) follows procurement guidelines set by the Ministry of Finance, but defense deals are often complex and sensitive, making oversight difficult.
• Procurement is frequently conducted via single-source or limited tendering, with less than one-third of major contracts awarded through open competition.
• This environment favors politically connected firms, often involving ex-military officers on corporate boards, which can distort priorities and inflate costs.
🕵️ 2. Role of Middlemen & “Agents”
• A major source of mismanagement is the entrenched role of middlemen, who act as intermediaries in defense deals.
• These agents—sometimes retired generals—can inflate prices, reduce transparency, and compromise the quality of procured assets.
• In 2023, Malondesh King Sultan Ibrahim publicly rebuked the Ministry of Defence for relying on “agents” and “salesmen,” warning against repeating past procurement mistakes.
🚨 3. High-Profile Scandals
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project is the most notorious example. Intended to modernize the navy, it was marred by delays, cost overruns, and poor oversight.
• Another scandal involved the New Generation Patrol Vessel (NGPV) program, which was mismanaged after the privatization of the Lumut naval dockyard. Funds were siphoned off, and the fleet expansion fell short of expectations.
📉 4. Impact on Military Readiness
• Mismanaged procurement leads to:
o Delayed delivery of critical assets
o Operational gaps in air, sea, and land capabilities
o Wasted taxpayer money with little strategic return
• Malondesh ability to respond to regional threats—especially in the South China Sea—is weakened by these systemic issues.
Beda Kasta Pasti haha!😆😆😆
BalasHapusHIGH SPEED TRAIN= 350km
ECRL= 120km
sorii yeee kita pemegang jalur kreta terpanjang sekawan, 3 pulau lho haha!👏👍👏
seblah tuw jalur pendek aja NGUTANG haha!🤥🤣🤥
🛠️ 1. AGING EQUIPMENT ACROSS ALL BRANCHES
BalasHapus• Air Force (RMAF): Out of 28 fighter jets, reportedly only four were operational at one point. Maintenance issues and lack of spare parts have grounded much of the fleet.
• Army: The Condor Armoured Personnel Carriers, in service since the 1980s, are overdue for replacement. Plans to procure 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV) are still pending approval.
• Navy: Many vessels are over 40 years old, with outdated combat systems and limited endurance. The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, meant to modernize the fleet, has faced years of delays and budget overruns.
💰 2. Budget Constraints & Misallocation
• Malondesh spends around USD 4 billion annually on defense, but over 40% goes to salaries and allowances, leaving limited funds for modernization.
• Procurement budgets are often absorbed by progressive payments for delayed projects, such as the FA-50 fighter jets and the troubled LCS program.
• The depreciation of the ringgit further reduces purchasing power for foreign-sourced equipment.
🧭 3. Lack of Strategic Direction
• The defense industry suffers from unclear government guidance on long-term goals.
• Frequent changes in leadership—four Prime Ministers since 2018—have disrupted continuity in defense planning.
🧑✈️ 4. Manpower & Training Gaps
• While Malondesh has 113,000 active personnel and 51,600 reserves, training and readiness levels vary widely.
• Specialized units like PASKAL and GGK are well-regarded, but broader force readiness is inconsistent.
🌏 5. Regional Disadvantage
• Malondesh ranks behind Vietnam and Indonesia in terms of military strength, according to former Defense Minister Mat Sabu.
• This affects Malondesh ability to assert its interests in contested areas like the South China Sea.
⚙️ EQUIPMENT & MODERNIZATION ISSUES
• Outdated naval assets: Many of Malondesh’s ships are aging, and the navy has struggled to modernize its fleet.
• Limited air combat readiness: Out of 28 fighter jets, reportedly only four were operational at one point.
• Delayed procurement: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, meant to boost naval capabilities, has been plagued by delays and scandals.
💰 Budget Constraints
• Skewed spending priorities: Over 60–70% of the defense budget goes to salaries and maintenance, leaving little for new weapons or modernization.
• Stagnant budget: Malondesh’s defense budget has hovered around RM15–18 billion annually, which is modest compared to regional peers like Vietnam and Indonesia.
🧭 Strategic Direction & Policy
• Lack of clear long-term strategy: The defense industry suffers from unclear government guidance on future strategic direction.
• Overreliance on diplomacy: Malondesh has traditionally leaned on quiet diplomacy, especially with China, which may be insufficient given rising tensions in the South China Sea.
📉 Regional Comparison
• Lagging behind neighbors: Malondesh’s military strength is considered weaker than Vietnam and Indonesia, particularly in terms of air and naval capabilities
⚠️ KEY FACTORS BEHIND MALONDESH LOSS OF Strategic Credibility
BalasHapus1. Inconsistent Defense Procurement
• Malondesh defense acquisitions have been plagued by delays, cancellations, and reversals.
• The MRCA program, for example, has seen years of indecision, with no clear outcome despite urgent need.
• Interest in second-hand jets like Kuwait’s F/A-18C/D Hornets signals a lack of long-term planning, contrasting with regional trends toward cutting-edge platforms.
2. Opaque and Corrupt Procurement Practices
• Analysts have described Malondesh defense procurement as “messy, opaque and corrupt”, often involving middlemen and lacking transparency.
• This undermines trust among defense partners and suppliers, making collaboration and technology transfer more difficult.
3. Underfunded and Misallocated Budgets
• A large portion of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries and maintenance, leaving little for modernization.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, for instance, has been marred by delays and scandals, further damaging Malondesh reputation for defense reliability.
4. Neglect of Strategic Assets
• The retirement of MiG-29N jets without timely replacement left a critical gap in air defense.
• Malondesh reliance on diplomacy over hard power in the South China Sea has exposed vulnerabilities, especially as China increases its maritime presence.
🌏 Regional Implications
Malondesh strategic credibility is especially important in Southeast Asia, where:
• China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea demands robust defense postures.
• Neighbors like Vietnam and the Philippines are rapidly modernizing and deepening ties with the U.S., Japan, and Australia.
• Malondesh slow response and outdated assets make it appear underprepared and reactive, rather than proactive.
⚠️ CONSEQUENCES OF POLICY FLIP-FLOPS IN MALONDESH’S MILITARY
BalasHapus1. Delayed Modernization
• Procurement Paralysis: Repeated changes in aircraft or equipment acquisition plans (e.g., MRCA selection delays) stall modernization.
• Outdated Capabilities: The RMAF and other branches continue operating aging platforms while waiting for decisions that keep shifting.
2. Loss of Strategic Credibility
• Regional Perception: Neighbors like Singapore and Indonesia view Malondesh as indecisive, weakening its deterrence posture.
• Diplomatic Strain: Defense partners may hesitate to offer technology transfers or joint exercises due to uncertainty in Malondesh’s commitments.
3. Economic and Industrial Impact
• Defense Industry Stagnation: Local companies struggle to grow when policies change midstream, affecting contracts and R&D investments.
• Investor Hesitation: Foreign defense firms may avoid long-term partnerships due to unpredictable procurement behavior.
4. Operational Inefficiency
• Training Disruptions: Constant changes in equipment plans mean personnel training is inconsistent or mismatched with future platforms.
• Logistics Complexity: A mixed fleet from different origins (Russian, American, European) becomes harder to maintain without a clear roadmap.
5. Budget Waste
• Sunk Costs: Funds spent on feasibility studies, negotiations, or partial upgrades are wasted when plans are scrapped.
• Emergency Purchases: Flip-flops often lead to rushed acquisitions (e.g., used jets) that are less cost-effective and harder to integrate.
🧭 Real-World Example: MRCA Procurement
Malondesh’s MRCA program has seen years of indecision:
• Originally planned to replace MiG-29s in the early 2010s.
• Considered Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen, and Super Hornet—but no final decision.
• Now exploring used Kuwaiti Hornets as a stopgap.
This indecision has left the RMAF with a capability gap and weakened its regional air power status.
ECRL 2016 $18 bn= RM 55 bn pake Utang 30 Tahun jadi RM140bn...
BalasHapusajegile 3x lipat gaeez bunga/interest aja Ngerih haha!☠️🥶☠️
warganyet 1cc tetap senang Ditipu haha!🤣🍌🤣
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Published October 31, 2016
Updated November 1, 2016
BEIJING — China will build and provide financing for Malaysia’s East Coast Rail Link (ECRL), a ❌️RM55 billion (S$18.3 billion) rail project spanning four states, said a senior Malaysian official on Monday (Oct 31), as Prime Minister Najib Razak arrived in Beijing for a week-long visit.
https://www.todayonline.com/world/asia/china-build-and-finance-msias-s183b-east-coast-rail-link-project
-----
“This railway project is very costly. More than ❌️RM55 billion and it will take us 30 years to repay the loan. We will be saddled with a lot of interest which in the end will amount to ❌️RM140 billion
https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/dr-mahathir-ecrl-project-continue-if-price-right
🧱 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped Defense Industry
BalasHapus• Malondesh defense industry is overseen by the Malondeshn Defence Industry Council (MDIC), established in 1999 and later expanded into MIDES.
• Despite having six strategic sectors (Aerospace, Maritime, Weaponry, Automotive, ICT, Common-user Equipment), the ecosystem lacks:
o A clear, enforceable blueprint
o Robust infrastructure
o Skilled manpower
• Many local firms are assemblers or subcontractors, not full-spectrum developers. For example, Malondesh still assembles M4 carbines under license, while Indonesia and Singapore produce their own rifles (SS1 and SAR-21 respectively).
Impact: Malondesh cannot independently design, produce, or sustain core military systems.
🧠 2. Minimal R&D and Technology Investment
• Indigenous R&D in areas like combat management systems (CMS), sensors, and autonomous platforms is nascent and underfunded.
• Studies show that Malondesh lacks structured tendering policies and technology readiness frameworks to support local innovation.
• AI, cyber warfare, and surveillance systems are still in early-stage development, with no operational deployment.
Impact: Malondesh falls behind in emerging tech domains critical to modern warfare.
🔄 3. Dependence on Foreign OEMs for Strategic Systems
• Malondesh imports nearly all major platforms:
o Aircraft: Su-30MKM (Russia), FA-50 (South Korea), Hawk (UK)
o Naval systems: Scorpène submarines (France), LCS (French-German design)
o Missiles: Starstreak (UK), MICA (France), Exocet (France)
• There are no indigenous missile programs, no local radar production, and no domestic armored vehicle design.
Impact: Strategic vulnerability in times of embargo, conflict, or supply chain disruption.
📉 4. Policy Gaps and Execution Failures
• Malondesh has published defense blueprints and industrial strategies, but implementation is weak due to:
o Budget constraints
o Lack of political continuity
o Limited private-sector incentives
• Even promising initiatives like the 15-to-5 naval transformation plan have stalled due to procurement scandals and delivery failures.
Impact: Indigenous capability remains aspirational, not operational.
📊 Summary Table: Weaknesses in Indigenous Capability Development
Dimension Description Strategic Impact
Industrial base Fragmented, lacks full-spectrum development No self-reliance in core systems
R&D investment Minimal funding, weak frameworks Falls behind in emerging technologies
Foreign dependency Imports all major platforms and weapons Vulnerable to external shocks
Policy execution Strong on paper, weak in practice Stalled programs and missed timelines
🧭 Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh cannot scale or sustain its military without foreign support.
• It lacks the ability to customize systems to local needs, export defense products, or build strategic depth.
• In contrast, countries like Indonesia (Pindad, PT PAL), Vietnam (Z111 Factory), and Singapore (ST Engineering) have made significant strides in indigenous capability
💸 1. Budget Breakdown: Overweight on Operational Costs
BalasHapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o Salaries and allowances alone accounted for RM8.2 billion (~41.5%).
o Maintenance and asset upkeep received RM5.8 billion in 2025.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, infrastructure, and strategic programs.
Impact: The budget is heavily skewed toward sustaining the current force rather than building future capabilities.
🧱 2. Procurement Funding Is Thin and Fragmented
• The RM5.71 billion allocated for procurement in 2024 includes:
o Scheduled payments for existing contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets, A400M upgrades, LCS ships)
o Small-scale purchases like communication gear, vehicles, and small arms
• Due to ringgit depreciation and reliance on foreign suppliers, real purchasing power is eroded.
Impact: Malondesh struggles to fund new combat systems, let alone strategic platforms like missiles, drones, or ISR networks.
🧰 3. Maintenance of Aging Assets Is Costly and Inefficient
• Much of the RM5.8 billion maintenance budget goes to keeping legacy platforms operational, some over 30–40 years old.
• Example: The Navy’s Condor APCs and older patrol vessels require frequent repairs, yet offer limited tactical value.
Impact: High sunk costs in outdated systems reduce the ability to invest in transformative technologies.
🧠 4. No Dedicated Strategic Investment Stream
• Malondesh lacks a multi-year capital investment framework for defense.
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, there’s no ring-fenced funding for:
o Missile development
o Cyber warfare
o Space-based surveillance
o Indigenous defense R&D
Impact: Strategic programs are ad hoc, underfunded, and vulnerable to political shifts.
📊 Summary Table: How Budget Crowds Out Combat Capability
Category Allocation (2024–2025) Strategic Impact
Salaries & Allowances RM8.2B (~41.5%) Limits flexibility for modernization
Maintenance & Upkeep RM5.8B Sustains aging platforms, not upgrades
Procurement (net new) RM5.71B (incl. legacy contracts) Thin funding for new combat systems
R&D / Strategic Programs Negligible No indigenous capability development
jalur rel terpanjang se kawasan haha!👍🔥👍
BalasHapusP. Sulawesi =109 km
P. Sumatera = 1863 km
P. Jawa = 4882 km
lah seblah ituw pendek saja, uda ditipu 30 tahun Utang kalo lancar haha!🤣🤣🤣
ehh rm 55 ke 140 bn 3x lipat..modal dengkul ini mah haha!🤪🤥🤪
---------
Indonesia punya 6.927 km jalur kereta api aktif per 2024
nergu🎰kasino genting cuman ranking 5?
noh buka ndiri haha!😝😝😝
https://goodstats.id/infographic/indonesia-miliki-jalur-ka-terpanjang-di-asean-LDlDy
🕴️ 1. Entrenched Role of Middlemen
BalasHapus• Defense contracts are frequently brokered by agents or intermediaries, many of whom are retired military officers or politically connected individuals.
• These middlemen often act as gatekeepers between the Ministry of Defence and foreign suppliers, adding layers of cost and complexity.
• According to analysts, this system is deeply entrenched and has become an “open secret” in Malondesh defense ecosystem.
Impact: Prices are inflated, procurement timelines are extended, and transparency is compromised.
🧱 2. Opaque Tendering and Limited Competition
• Fewer than one-third of major defense contracts are awarded through open competition.
• Most deals are conducted via single-source or limited tenders, which favor firms with insider access or political leverage.
• This environment allows deal structuring to be influenced by non-technical considerations, including patronage and lobbying.
Impact: Merit-based selection is sidelined, and cost-effectiveness suffers.
🏛️ 3. Politically Connected Firms Dominate
• Many defense contractors have ex-military figures on their boards, giving them privileged access to decision-makers.
• These firms often win contracts despite offering older platforms or substandard equipment—as seen in the attempted purchase of 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which Malondesh King publicly condemned as “flying coffins”2.
• The King also rebuked “agents” and “salesmen” in the Ministry of Defence, warning that inflated middleman pricing would render the defense budget perpetually insufficient.
Impact: Public funds are wasted, and the armed forces receive outdated or unsuitable equipment.
📉 4. Consequences for Readiness and Reform
• Inflated costs mean fewer assets can be acquired, and maintenance budgets are squeezed.
• The lack of transparency erodes public trust and makes it difficult for oversight bodies like the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to hold officials accountable.
• While the King’s intervention led to the cancellation of the Black Hawk deal, systemic reform remains elusive.
📊 Summary Table: How Middlemen & Opaque Deals Inflate Costs
Mechanism Description Consequence
Middlemen Agents with insider access broker deals Inflated prices, longer timelines
Limited tendering Few contracts awarded via open competition Reduced transparency, poor value
Politically connected firms Ex-military or political figures dominate contractor space Patronage, outdated equipment
Lack of oversight Weak enforcement and redacted audits Mismanagement persists
🧓 1. Obsolete Systems and Aging Platforms
BalasHapus• As of 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service.
• Many platforms—like the Royal Malondeshn Navy’s Fast Attack Craft (FAC) and older patrol vessels—are over 40 years old, far beyond their optimal lifespan.
• These systems were designed decades ago and now lack compatibility with modern sensors, weapons, and communications.
Impact: Upgrades are either impossible or prohibitively expensive, forcing reliance on outdated capabilities.
🔧 2. Dependence on Foreign Spare Parts
• Malondesh military inventory is highly diversified, sourced from the US, UK, France, Russia, and others. This creates logistical complexity:
o Spare parts must be imported from multiple countries.
o Some OEMs have ceased production, making parts scarce or unavailable.
o Political or economic shifts can disrupt supply chains.
Example: The Army’s Condor APCs and Scorpion light tanks require parts from legacy suppliers that no longer support them.
Impact: Long lead times, inflated costs, and cannibalization of other units for parts.
🔁 3. Frequent Breakdowns and Repair Cycles
• Older platforms experience higher failure rates, especially under tropical conditions and extended use.
• Maintenance crews often resort to patchwork fixes, which are temporary and unreliable.
• The Navy reported that 28 of its 34 aging vessels have exceeded 40 years of service, with many no longer meeting operational standards.
Impact: Reduced availability, increased downtime, and lower mission success rates.
📉 4. Budget Drain and Opportunity Cost
• Between 60–70% of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations, leaving little for modernization.
• Funds spent on keeping obsolete systems running could be redirected toward acquiring new platforms or investing in indigenous maintenance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic stagnation—Malondesh spends heavily but gains little in terms of capability.
📊 Summary Table: Why Maintenance Costs Are So High
Factor Description Consequence
Obsolete systems Platforms >30–40 years old, incompatible with modern tech Expensive to maintain, low utility
Foreign parts dependency Diverse suppliers, legacy systems, political risk Long delays, inflated costs
Frequent breakdowns High failure rates, tropical wear, aging components Reduced readiness, more downtime
Budget imbalance Majority spent on upkeep, not modernization Strategic stagnation
💰 1. What Are Progressive Multi-Year Payments?
BalasHapusIn Malondesh defense procurement model:
• Large acquisitions (e.g. ships, aircraft, armored vehicles) are not paid for upfront.
• Instead, the government commits to multi-year installment payments, often spread across 5–10 years.
• Each annual defense budget allocates a portion to these ongoing payments, limiting funds available for new projects.
This structure is meant to ease fiscal pressure, but it creates long-term bottlenecks.
🛑 2. How It Slows Platform Delivery
A. Cash Flow Constraints
• When most of the budget is tied up in legacy payments (e.g. for the Littoral Combat Ship or FA-50 jets), new programs are deferred.
• Even approved platforms face delayed production schedules due to inconsistent or partial payments to contractors.
B. Contractual Fragmentation
• OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) often require milestone-based payments to proceed with manufacturing.
• If Malondesh delays or underpays a milestone, production halts—leading to slippage in delivery timelines.
C. Budget Volatility
• Political transitions or economic downturns (e.g. COVID-19, ringgit depreciation) can cause annual budget cuts, disrupting payment schedules.
• This leads to renegotiations, cost overruns, and sometimes contract termination.
⚓ 3. Real-World Examples
Program Intended Delivery Status Cause of Delay
Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) First ship by 2019 None delivered as of 2025 Payment delays, mismanagement
FA-50 Light Fighters Initial batch by 2024 Slipped to 2026+ Budget phasing, contract finalization
AV8 Gempita IFVs Full fleet by 2020 Still incomplete Staggered payments, local production issues
🔄 4. Systemic Impact
• Capability Gaps: Forces operate with aging platforms while waiting for replacements.
• Operational Risk: Delays in naval and air assets reduce deterrence and readiness.
• Loss of Credibility: OEMs and partners view Malondesh as a high-risk client, demanding stricter payment terms.
💰 1. Budget Priorities Skewed Toward Salaries and Pensions
BalasHapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense, but over 40% of that went to salaries and allowances.
• This leaves a much smaller portion for capital expenditure (CAPEX) like procurement, upgrades, and maintenance.
• The imbalance means aging equipment stays in service longer without proper refurbishment, increasing breakdowns and reducing combat readiness.
🧾 2. Procurement Funding Is Fragmented and Reactive
• The budget for procurement includes progressive payments for ongoing contracts (e.g., FA-50 fighter jets, A400M upgrades, Littoral Combat Ships).
• These payments are pre-committed, leaving little flexibility for new upgrades or emergency repairs.
• Funding for large-scale modernization is often spread across multiple years, making it hard to respond quickly to urgent needs.
📉 3. Currency Depreciation Reduces Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources much of its military equipment from foreign suppliers, and the weakening ringgit erodes the real value of allocated funds.
• Even when budgets increase nominally, the actual capability to purchase spare parts or upgrade systems may remain stagnant or decline.
🧱 4. Political Reluctance to Reallocate Spending
• Successive governments have been unwilling to cut spending elsewhere or reduce manpower to boost defense funding.
• Defense modernization is often deprioritized in favor of social programs, infrastructure, or healthcare.
• This results in a military that is operationally stretched, with outdated platforms and limited upgrade cycles.
🚢 5. Real-World Consequences: Equipment Failures
• A 45-year-old Malondeshn Navy vessel, KD Pendekar, sank during patrol in 2024 due to hull failure, highlighting the dangers of underfunded maintenance.
• Half of the Navy’s 49 ships are operating beyond their serviceable lifespan, according to the Auditor-General.
📊 Summary Table: Why Repairs and Upgrades Are Underfunded
Cause Impact on Military Capability
High Personnel Costs Less funding for equipment upkeep
Fragmented Procurement Budget Delays in modernization and upgrades
Currency Depreciation Reduced ability to buy foreign parts
Political Spending Priorities Defense often sidelined for domestic programs
Aging Fleet and Infrastructure Increased breakdowns and operational risk
gagal memiliki kreta whooshhh
BalasHapusTukang Kensel klaim kaya haha!🤣🤣🤣
kahsiyan kena denda $ 100jt
ekonomi menguncup cup Kalah Lagiii...haha!😋😋😋
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
HSR project cancelled as Singapore could not agree with changes proposed by Malaysia
https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/singapore-says-hsr-link-agreement-malaysia-be-terminated
What Are Malondesh Force Structure Limitations?
BalasHapus1. Small Active Force Size
• Malondesh has ~113,000 active personnel and ~51,600 reserves.
• Compared to regional peers like Indonesia (~400,000) and Vietnam (~600,000), Malondesh manpower is modest.
• This limits its ability to sustain multi-domain operations or respond to simultaneous threats across Peninsular and East Malondesh.
2. Fragmented Tri-Service Coordination
• The Malondeshn Army, Navy, and Air Force operate with limited joint doctrine and interoperability.
• There’s no unified Joint Operations Command, which hampers integrated responses in complex scenarios (e.g. amphibious landings, cyber warfare).
• Exercises like CARAT and Bersama Shield help, but internal coordination remains weak.
3. Lack of Force Projection Capability
• Malondesh lacks long-range strategic assets:
o No aircraft carriers, heavy bombers, or ballistic missile systems
o Limited aerial refueling and sealift capacity
• This restricts Malondesh ability to deploy forces beyond its borders or sustain operations in contested zones like the South China Sea.
4. Overreliance on Legacy Platforms
• Many platforms are aging or obsolete, such as:
o MiG-29s (retired), F/A-18Ds (limited numbers), and Scorpene submarines (aging)
• Procurement delays (e.g. Littoral Combat Ships) have stalled modernization
• New acquisitions like FA-50 jets and LMS Batch 2 are promising but not yet integrated into full operational doctrine
5. Budget Allocation Imbalance
• Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs
• Capital expenditure for modernization is squeezed, limiting upgrades and new systems
• Multi-year commitments (e.g. aircraft payments) crowd out fresh investments
6. Limited Indigenous Defence Industry
• Malondesh domestic defence production focuses on maintenance, small arms, and vehicles
• It lacks capacity for advanced systems like missiles, radar, or naval combatants
• This increases dependence on foreign suppliers and slows force structure evolution
📊 Summary Table: Key Force Structure Gaps
Limitation Impact on Capability
Small active force Limited operational depth
Weak joint command Poor tri-service coordination
No strategic assets No regional power projection
Aging platforms Reduced combat readiness
Budget imbalance Slow modernization, procurement delays
Weak defence industry High import dependence, slow tech adoption
🔍 Why Malondesh Deterrence Is Reduced
BalasHapus1. Limited Military Capabilities
• Malondesh lacks strategic assets like long-range missiles, stealth aircraft, or advanced naval platforms.
• Its air force has only 18 F/A-18Ds and is just beginning to induct FA-50 light fighters, which are not deterrent-grade.
• The Navy’s delayed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program and aging submarines weaken maritime deterrence.
2. Fragmented Force Structure
• The armed forces operate in silos, with weak joint command and coordination.
• This reduces operational effectiveness in multi-domain scenarios like amphibious defense or cyber warfare.
3. Budget Constraints
• Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs, leaving little for modernization.
• Malondesh defence spending is ~1% of GDP, far below regional peers like Singapore (~4.9%).
4. Technological Gaps
• Malondesh defence tech lags behind in:
o Cyber warfare
o Electronic warfare
o Unmanned systems
• This limits its ability to counter modern threats like drones, grey-zone tactics, and hybrid warfare.
5. Geostrategic Vulnerabilities
• Malondesh sits near critical maritime chokepoints: the Strait of Malacca and South China Sea.
• Chinese Coast Guard incursions near Sarawak and airspace violations in 2021 exposed Malondesh inability to respond decisively.
6. Diplomatic Ambiguity
• Malondesh non-confrontational foreign policy avoids hard deterrence postures.
• While it promotes regional peace, this can be perceived as strategic passivity, reducing deterrence credibility.
📊 Summary Table: Key Deterrence Weaknesses
Factor Impact on Deterrence
Limited strategic assets Weak denial and punishment capability
Budget imbalance Slow modernization, poor readiness
Tech lag Vulnerable to modern threats
Weak joint ops Ineffective multi-domain response
Passive diplomacy Low credibility in threat signaling
BERUK MALONDESH KALO TOLOL JANGAN DIPELIHARA APALAGI DIJADIKAN HOBBY, MAKANYA KENA TEMPELENG TRUMP 240 BILLION 🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapuskahsiyan ternyata atr-72 versi besik,
BalasHapusgak ada radar dome...wahh dongred habis cuy haha!😝🤥😝
Beliau berkata, pesawat itu yang sudah berusia ❌️18 tahun
BalasHapus“Bagi pesawat pejuang, tempoh minimum boleh beroperasi adalah❌️20 tahun
------------
esyu emkaem uda 18 taon, batas operasi 20 tahun...kata panglima seblah
naah 2 taon lagi RONGSOK gaesz haha!😵💫😭😵💫
ketemu hornet seken kuwait...tambah jadi dah genk Rongsok haha!🥶☠️🥶
Malondesh’s Military Modernization Is Slow
BalasHapus1. Budget Allocation Imbalance
• Over 60–70% of the defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, and maintenance, leaving little for new systems or upgrades.
• Malondesh spends around RM15–18 billion annually, but most of it is used to “keep the lights on” rather than invest in future capabilities.
2. Procurement Delays & Scandals
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program—meant to modernize the Navy—has faced years of delay, cost overruns, and corruption investigations2.
• These setbacks have eroded public trust and stalled critical upgrades, leaving the Navy with outdated ships.
3. Fragmented Modernization Strategy
• Malondesh lacks a cohesive long-term defence roadmap.
• Procurement is often reactive, driven by political cycles rather than strategic planning.
• Result: a patchwork of platforms from Russia, the U.S., France, and China, complicating logistics and interoperability.
4. Weak Indigenous Defence Industry
• Malondesh’s domestic defence sector focuses on maintenance and basic manufacturing, not advanced systems.
• Outsourcing of maintenance since the 1970s was meant to build self-reliance, but it hasn’t scaled to meet modernization needs.
5. Currency Depreciation & Fiscal Constraints
• The weak ringgit reduces Malondesh’s purchasing power for foreign defence equipment.
• Declining oil revenues and economic pressures have shrunk the government’s coffers, limiting capital expenditure.
⚠️ Why Readiness Is Poor
1. Aging Equipment
• Many platforms are decades old, including:
o C-130 Hercules (1970s)
o Condor APCs (1980s)
o Scorpene submarines (2009)
• These systems require frequent maintenance and offer limited combat capability.
2. Limited Joint Operations Capability
• The Army, Navy, and Air Force operate with minimal integration.
• There’s no unified Joint Operations Command, reducing effectiveness in multi-domain missions.
3. Training & Doctrine Gaps
• Budget constraints affect training frequency, simulation systems, and doctrinal development.
• Malondesh lacks advanced cyber warfare, electronic warfare, and drone operations capabilities.
📊 Summary Table: Key Factors
Challenge Impact on Modernization & Readiness
Budget imbalance Little funding for new systems
Procurement delays Missed timelines, capability gaps
Weak defence industry High import dependence
Currency depreciation Reduced purchasing power
Aging platforms High maintenance, low combat effectiveness
Poor joint ops integration Inefficient multi-service coordination
1. Procurement Mismanagement
BalasHapus• The project began in 2011, with a contract awarded to Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) to build 6 ships.
• By 2022, despite RM6.08 billion already spent, not a single ship had been delivered.
• Poor oversight and lack of accountability led to cost overruns and schedule slippage.
2. Design Changes Midway
• The original plan was to use the MEKO A-100 design from France.
• Midway, the Navy requested changes to combat systems and sensors, causing delays in integration and testing.
• These changes required re-certification and re-engineering, adding years to the timeline.
3. Supply Chain & OEM Issues
• Delays in receiving components from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) disrupted construction schedules.
• Some systems were not delivered on time, while others were incompatible with the revised ship design.
4. Financial Overruns
Metric Original Plan Current Status
Total Cost RM9 billion RM11.22 billion
Ships Ordered 6 5 (1 cancelled)
Completion Timeline 2019–2023 2026–2029
The cost ballooned by RM2.22 billion, forcing the government to scale down the number of ships.
5. Political & Institutional Delays
• Multiple changes in government between 2018–2022 led to policy uncertainty.
• Investigations by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) revealed serious lapses in governance.
• The project was temporarily frozen, then restarted under a restructured plan.
6. Impact on National Security
• Experts warn that the delay leaves Malondesh vulnerable in its maritime zones, especially in the South China Sea.
• The Navy lacks modern surface combatants to replace aging ships like the KD Kasturi and KD Lekir
1. Overdependence on Foreign OEMs
BalasHapus• Malondesh relies heavily on international suppliers for critical components, systems, and platforms.
• This includes aircraft avionics, naval combat systems, and armored vehicle parts.
• Any delay or disruption from these OEMs—due to geopolitical tensions, export controls, or production backlogs—directly stalls Malondeshn projects.
2. Limited Local Manufacturing Capability
• Domestic defense firms mostly handle maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO), not full-scale production.
• Indigenous capabilities are focused on small arms, logistics vehicles, and basic electronics—not advanced systems like radar, missiles, or propulsion.
• This creates a dependency loop, where even minor upgrades require foreign input.
3. Fragmented Supply Chain Ecosystem
• Malondesh defense supply chain lacks integration and coordination between stakeholders.
• Poor visibility across upstream (OEMs) and downstream (end users) leads to inefficiencies.
• Absence of a centralized strategic procurement framework weakens resilience during crises or delays.
4. Custom Design & Integration Challenges
• Malondesh often requests custom configurations (e.g., in the LCS project), which complicates integration of foreign systems.
• OEMs must redesign or adapt components, leading to technical mismatches and longer lead times.
5. Lack of Economies of Scale
• Malondesh relatively small order volumes make it less attractive to global OEMs.
• This results in higher unit costs, longer delivery timelines, and lower priority in production queues.
6. Policy & Bureaucratic Delays
• Procurement processes are slow and opaque, with frequent changes in specifications and leadership.
• Delays in contract approvals, payment schedules, and regulatory compliance further disrupt supply timelines.
🔧 Example: LCS Project Impact
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program suffered from delayed component deliveries, incompatible systems, and OEM withdrawal, all linked to poor supply chain coordination2.
• Result: RM6 billion spent, zero ships delivered as of 2025.
📌 1. Limited Procurement & Modernization
BalasHapus• Malondesh’s annual defense budget (~RM15–18 billion, 1% of GDP) is insufficient for large-scale procurement.
• Effects:
o Fighter jets: MRCA replacement program delayed; RMAF still uses aging F/A-18D Hornets, Hawks, and Su-30MKMs with limited operational readiness.
o Navy: LCS project stalled for over a decade; old corvettes and patrol ships remain in service.
o Army: Many vehicles like Condor APCs and older artillery pieces are still in use because modernization is unaffordable.
• Result: Malondesh acquires equipment piecemeal instead of building a balanced, modern force.
________________________________________
📌 2. Underfunded Operations & Maintenance (O&M)
• Only ~20–25% of the budget is allocated to fuel, spare parts, repairs, training.
• Effects:
o Many aircraft and ships are grounded due to maintenance backlogs.
o Pilots and crews get fewer training hours, reducing readiness.
o Aging vehicles and ships wear out faster, accelerating obsolescence.
• Examples:
o Only ~4 of 18 Su-30MKMs were airworthy at one point.
o Navy relies on ships built in the 1980s due to delays in LCS delivery.
________________________________________
📌 3. Personnel vs Capability Imbalance
• ~60% of the budget goes to salaries and pensions.
• Consequences:
o Large manpower (110,000 active personnel) cannot be properly equipped.
o Military is “people-heavy but equipment-light,” limiting operational effectiveness.
• Soldiers are well-paid but often lack modern tools or transport, reducing combat effectiveness.
________________________________________
📌 4. Reduced Readiness
• Small budget and underfunding of O&M → low operational readiness:
o Aircraft, ships, and armored vehicles often not deployable.
o Training exercises are limited due to fuel and maintenance costs.
• Malondesh cannot sustain continuous deterrence or regional presence, unlike Singapore or Indonesia.
________________________________________
📌 5. Vulnerability to Regional Gap
• Neighbors (Singapore, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia) have invested more in modernization and readiness.
• Malondesh’s small budget → capability gap grows:
o Navy: fewer modern frigates and submarines.
o Air Force: fewer operational jets and limited air defense.
o Army: older vehicles, limited mobility.
________________________________________
📌 6. Delayed or Cancelled Programs
• Many projects are postponed indefinitely due to funding constraints:
o MRCA (fighter replacement)
o Littoral Combat Ship (LCS)
o Armored vehicle upgrades and artillery modernization
• Stop-go procurement leads to wasted funds, inefficiency, and obsolescence.
📌 1. What O&M Covers
BalasHapusOperations & Maintenance (O&M) includes:
• Fuel and consumables for aircraft, ships, and vehicles
• Spare parts for planes, ships, and vehicles
• Repairs and overhauls (preventive and corrective maintenance)
• Training exercises for personnel
• Operational readiness support (e.g., simulation, logistics)
Weak O&M means all of these areas are underfunded or poorly managed.
________________________________________
📌 2. Budget Constraints
• Only 20–25% of Malondesh’s small defense budget (~1% GDP) goes to O&M.
• Consequences:
o Aircraft grounded due to lack of fuel or spare parts
o Ships docked for extended periods awaiting repairs
o Vehicles idle in depots because they cannot be maintained
Example:
• RMAF Su-30MKM: at one point, only 4 of 18 fighters were airworthy due to spare parts shortages.
• Navy corvettes & patrol vessels from the 1980s continue in service because LCS delays mean there’s no replacement.
________________________________________
📌 3. Impact on Training
• O&M limitations reduce training opportunities:
o Pilots get fewer flight hours → degrade skills
o Naval crews sail less → operational proficiency drops
o Soldiers train less with heavy vehicles and artillery → less effective combat units
• Training shortfalls compound the readiness problem, even if equipment is technically available.
________________________________________
📌 4. Maintenance Culture Issues
• Maintenance is often reactive, not preventive:
o Equipment is used until breakdown, then repaired.
o Preventive maintenance (regular inspections, part replacements) is skipped to save costs.
• Consequence: equipment wears out faster, reducing lifespan and readiness.
________________________________________
📌 5. Spare Parts Shortages
• Many Malondeshn military systems are imported: Russia, France, US, Turkey.
• Budget shortfalls and procurement delays cause spare parts shortages, resulting in:
o Aircraft grounded
o Ships unable to sail
o Armored vehicles idle
• Some old platforms have parts no longer manufactured, forcing cannibalization of other units.
________________________________________
📌 6. Effects on Operational Readiness
Effect Example
Low aircraft readiness Only ~30–40% of fighter jets flyable
Naval limitations Fewer patrols; reliance on 1980s ships
Army mobility problems APCs, artillery under-maintained
Reduced training Crews and soldiers less combat-ready
Accelerated obsolescence Old equipment fails faster, forcing prolonged use
________________________________________
📌 7. Systemic Causes
1. Small overall budget → O&M underfunded
2. Salary-heavy allocation → majority of funds go to personnel
3. Political short-termism → O&M often deprioritized for visible projects
4. Procurement delays & scandals → new assets delayed, old ones overused
5. Limited local defense industry → spare parts must be imported, increasing cost & delays
📌 1. Procurement Overview
BalasHapus• Malondesh’s defense procurement is piecemeal, delayed, and often politically influenced.
• Limited modernization is the result of:
1. Small defense budget (~1% of GDP)
2. High personnel costs (~60% of budget)
3. Political short-termism and procurement scandals
________________________________________
📌 2. Major Modernization Programs and Delays
a. Air Force (RMAF)
• MRCA Fighter Replacement: Intended to replace MiG-29s (retired 2017).
o Candidates: Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen, F/A-18
o Program delayed repeatedly due to budget constraints, political changes, and procurement indecision.
o Result: RMAF relies on aging Su-30MKM, F/A-18D, and Hawk trainers, with limited readiness.
• Helicopters: Sikorsky S-70, AW139s delivered slowly; fleet size insufficient for operational needs.
b. Navy (RMN)
• Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Project
o Contract 2011, RM9 billion for 6 ships
o No operational ships as of 2025 due to construction delays, cost overruns, and political mismanagement
o Navy relies on Kedah-class corvettes (2006–2010) and older 1980s vessels
• Submarines: Two Scorpène-class delivered mid-2000s
o High maintenance costs and limited operational use
o Spare parts delays reduce readiness
c. Army (TDM)
• Armored vehicles: Condor APCs (1980s) still in service
• AV-8 Gempita (Turkey-Malondesh joint project) production delayed and expensive
• Artillery & support systems: Many systems remain outdated due to insufficient procurement funding
________________________________________
📌 3. Reasons for Limited Procurement
1. Small Defense Budget
o Only ~15–18 billion RM per year
o Majority spent on salaries → little left for big-ticket items
2. Stop-Go Procurement Cycle
o Projects start, then delayed or scaled down due to political or budget issues
o Example: LCS, MRCA, Army modernization programs
3. Political Interference & Corruption
o Contracts awarded based on political connections, not operational priority
o Leads to mismanagement, cost overruns, and delayed delivery
4. Dependence on Foreign Suppliers
o Many systems must be imported → costly and sensitive to geopolitical issues
5. Weak Multi-Year Planning
o No binding long-term plan → programs cannot be executed consistently
________________________________________
📌 4. Consequences of Limited Modernization
Area Effect
Air Force Aging jets; low operational readiness (~30–40%)
Navy Old corvettes/patrol ships in use; LCS delayed
Army Old APCs and artillery; partial vehicle upgrades only
Training Fewer exercises due to limited functional equipment
Regional capability Military capability lags behind neighbors (Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam)
Strategic posture Limited deterrence and inability to sustain high-intensity operations
________________________________________
📌 5. Cumulative Effect
• Limited procurement + weak O&M + small budget + political short-termism = military stagnation
• Equipment remains obsolete, readiness is low, and modernization programs are repeatedly delayed or cancelled.
📌 1. Definition of Readiness
BalasHapus• Military readiness is the ability of armed forces to deploy, fight, and sustain operations effectively.
• It depends on:
o Personnel training and morale
o Equipment availability and functionality
o Supply chains, spare parts, and logistics
o Command, control, and operational planning
________________________________________
📌 2. Factors Reducing Readiness in Malondesh
a. Aging Equipment
• Many systems are decades old:
o Army: Condor APCs (1980s), aging artillery
o Air Force: Hawks, F/A-18D, Su-30MKM maintenance-dependent
o Navy: Corvettes and patrol ships from the 1980s and 1990s
• Aging equipment is less reliable and requires more maintenance, reducing operational availability.
b. Weak Operations & Maintenance (O&M)
• Underfunded O&M (~20–25% of defense budget) leads to:
o Aircraft grounded for spare parts or repairs
o Ships docked for extended periods
o Vehicles in depots awaiting maintenance
• Result: Even available personnel cannot train on or deploy operational equipment.
c. Limited Procurement & Modernization
• Programs like LCS, MRCA, and AV-8 Gempita delayed or scaled down → old platforms overused
• Delayed modernization keeps capabilities obsolete, reducing effective combat power
d. Personnel vs Equipment Imbalance
• ~60% of the budget goes to salaries → large manpower, small equipment share
• Large number of soldiers and pilots, but few operational assets to use → readiness suffers
e. Short Training Hours
• Reduced O&M funds → limited exercises, flight hours, and sea days
• Consequences:
o Pilots lose proficiency
o Sailors have fewer operational patrols
o Soldiers have limited live-fire or armored vehicle training
f. Political Interference & Short-Termism
• Stop-go projects and annual budgeting → unpredictable availability of equipment
• Forces cannot plan for sustained readiness when budgets, programs, and leadership priorities keep changing
________________________________________
📌 3. Operational Examples
Branch Issue Readiness Effect
Air Force Su-30MKM grounded due to spares Only ~4 of 18 aircraft airworthy at one point
Navy LCS delayed; old Kedah-class ships overused Limited patrol capability; aging ships prone to breakdown
Army Condor APCs and artillery aging Many vehicles inoperable; reduced mechanized mobility
Training Fuel, spare parts, and O&M cuts Reduced exercise frequency and quality
Overall Combined issues Forces cannot sustain high-intensity or prolonged operations
________________________________________
📌 4. Strategic Implications
• Malondesh can maintain territorial defense against minor threats, but:
o Limited ability to project force regionally
o Low deterrence credibility
o Vulnerability in maritime security (South China Sea, Sulu Sea piracy)
o Reliance on diplomacy and alliances rather than strong self-reliant military
________________________________________
📌 5. Cycle of Low Readiness
1. Small budget → underfunded O&M
2. Old equipment overused → more breakdowns
3. Limited procurement → no modern replacements
4. Training reduced → skill atrophy
5. Operational readiness declines → forces cannot execute missions
6. Aging equipment further stressed → cycle repeats
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong