Latihan pengisian bahan bakar di udara (Air-to-Air Refueling/AAR) (photos: TNI AU)
Penerbang F-16 TNI Angkatan Udara (TNI AU) mengasah kemampuan dengan melaksanakan latihan pengisian bahan bakar di udara (Air-to-Air Refueling/AAR) bersama pesawat tanker KC-30A Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) di military training area Lanud Roesmin Nurjadin, Kamis (28/8/2025).
.webp)
Kegiatan ini bagian dari rangkaian Latihan Bersama (Latma) Elang Ausindo antara TNI AU dan RAAF.
.webp)
Latihan AAR bertujuan meningkatkan keterampilan penerbang sekaligus memperkuat interoperabilitas kedua angkatan udara. Metode ini memungkinkan perpanjangan radius jelajah, peningkatan daya tahan tempur, serta fleksibilitas operasi udara.
.webp)
Danwing Udara 6 sekaligus Direktur Latma Elang Ausindo dari TNI AU, Kolonel Pnb Adhi Safarul Akbar, menyampaikan bahwa integrasi AAR menambah bobot latihan sekaligus membuat skenario semakin realistis.
.webp)
“Dengan dukungan air-to-air refueling, skenario yang kami desain semakin mendekati operasi sesungguhnya, sehingga meningkatkan kualitas pelatihan dan kesiapan tempur,” ujar Danwing Udara 6.
.webp)
Kegiatan ini menjadi wujud penguatan hubungan bilateral antara TNI AU dan RAAF. Selain itu, latihan ini juga selaras dengan nilai TNI AU AMPUH (Adaptif, Modern, Profesional, Unggul, dan Humanis) yang diinisiasi Kasau Marsekal TNI M. Tonny Harjono, S.E., M.M., serta mendukung program prioritas TNI AU, khususnya di bidang peningkatan kualitas SDM.
(TNI AU)
M109 kensel, kahsiyan gak punyak SPH haha!🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusdikasi gratis,
BalasHapus❌️blekhok brunei nolak
❌️sph tank m109 nolak
Karma, skarang gak punyak NGAMUK haha!🤣🔥🤣
kita donk dapet free
BalasHapus✅️f-16 Spesial 2 skuadron dr amrik
✅️LVT 7 15 bijik tank amfibi
✅️pohang korvet semakin hampir
✅️bushmaster
Bentar lagi kita dapet aset yg lebih ciamik, gretonk
warganyet iri dengki, hanya dapet 2 rongsok austal pendek murah ituw pun rebutan antar instansi haha!😋😋😋
DAFTAR PENGADAAN ALUTSISTA ON PROGRESS
BalasHapus2 KRI Frigate Brawijaya Class dari Italia
2 KRI Frigate Merah Putih dari PT PAL
2 KRI Frigate Istif Class dari Turkiye
1 KRI Rigel Class dari Palindo/Jerman
2 KRI Kapal Cepat Rudal dari Turkiye
1 KRI Kapal Cepat Rudal dari Tesco Bekasi
2 KS Scorpene dari Perancis & PT PAL
1 Kapal Induk Giribaldi dari Italia (Opsi)
1 Kapal LHD Helikopter dari PT PAL (Opsi)
42 Jet Tempur Rafale dari Perancis
48 Jet Tempur IFX kerjasama Korsel RI
48 Jet Tempur KHAAN dari Turkiye
6 Jet Tempur T50 dari Korsel
2 Pesawat angkut A400M dari Spanyol
13 Radar GCI dari Thales Perancis
12 Radar Retia dari Ceko
3 Baterai Rudal Balistik KHAN Turkiye
3 Baterai Rudal ADS Trisula dari Turkiye
22 Helikopter Blackhawk dari AS
12 Drone Anka dari Turkiye
60 Drone Bayraktar TB3 dari Turkiye
45 Rudal anti kapal Atmaca dari Turkiye
=============
1. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract five units C130J Hercules
2. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract two unit Frankethal class Countermine vessels (Pulau Fani class)
3. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract four units KCR 60 Fast missiles boats PT PAL
4. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 9 units Bell 412 EPI
5. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 8 additional H225 M
6. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 2 units Bell 429 Global Ranger
7. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 18 Medium weight tank Harimau
8. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 22 Pandur II IFV
9. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract two unit Hospital Ships
10. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract one unit Command and control variant C295
11. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract one unit CN235 MPA
12. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 7 Badak FSV, 26 ANOa apc and 10 additional Komodo recce vehicles in 2022
13. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 4 AS 550 Fennec and 8 AS565 MBE, in 2024
14. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract five NC212i in 2023
15. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract one Leonardo RAT 31 DL/M
16. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract five C130H ordered from Australia in 2013 (finished in 2020) after received Grant of 4 C130H
17. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 9 Teluk Bintuni class LST
18. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract six CH4B UCAV ordered in 2019
19. real contract t and process building of Abeking & Rasmussen design ocean Hydrography ship
20. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract building two AH140 AAW Frigate
21. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract building two OPV 90 ASW patrol vessels
22. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract building 42 Dassault Rafale F4 fighter
23. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract building two A400M heavy cargo aircraft
24. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract M3 Amphibious bridging system
25. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 3 KT1 Wong Bee ordered in 2018 along with radar and spares for T/A50
26. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract building 13 GM 403 GCI radar from Thales
27. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract building 12 ANKA S UCAV
28. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract building additional CH4B UCAV
29. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract Slingshot Satcom system
30. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract Falcon 8X aircraft
31. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract Thales Alenia earth observation satelite
32. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 22 S70M Blackhawk
33. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 6 N219 aircraft
34. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 3 CN235 for Army
35. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 2 PPA patrol Frigate
36. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 2 Scorpene Subs
37. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract Khan Short Range ballistic missiles from Turki
38. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract Trisula Air defense system
39. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 6 T50i aircraft
40. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract Oiler and replenishment ship
41. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract several Tug Harbor ships
42. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract Submarine rescue vessels and system
43. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract two Large LCU for army
44. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 45 Atmaca
45. BERUK KLAIM GHOIB = real contract 48 KAAN
MISKIN = MARCH 2025 .....
BalasHapusRM1. 65 TRILLION = 84.3% OF GDP
RM1. 65 TRILLION = 84.3% OF GDP
RM1. 65 TRILLION = 84.3% OF GDP
MARCH 2025 — deputy finance minister. KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 13): Malondesh's household debt stood at RM1. 65 trillion as of end-March 2025, equivalent to 84.3% of gross domestic product (GDP) as at end-March 2025, a level that remains elevated but is balanced by strong household assets.
=============
WEAKNESS MILITARY BUDGET
The Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), comprising the Malondeshn Army, Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN), and Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF), has made strides in regional defense and modernization. However, the military budget presents several notable weaknesses and challenges that affect its overall operational effectiveness and long-term development:
________________________________________
1. Limited Defense Budget
• Low % of GDP: Malondesh spends around 1.0–1.1% of its GDP on defense, which is below the global average (~2.2%) and regional peers like Singapore, Vietnam, or Indonesia.
• Budget Constraints: The relatively small budget restricts procurement of modern equipment, upkeep of aging assets, and readiness for prolonged operations.
________________________________________
2. Delays in Modernization Programs
• Budget limitations cause delays in:
Fighter jet replacement (e.g. RMAF MiG-29s retired without full replacement).
Maritime patrol and littoral combat ships (LCS program delayed and over-budget).
Helicopter acquisitions and airlift capabilities.
• These delays impact operational readiness and reduce Malondesh’s deterrence capability.
________________________________________
3. Over-reliance on Foreign Equipment
• A large portion of defense procurement is imported, making it:
Vulnerable to exchange rate fluctuations.
Subject to foreign political decisions or supply chain disruptions.
• Indigenous defense industries are developing, but not yet at scale to reduce this dependency significantly.
________________________________________
4. Limited Joint Force Integration & Interoperability
• Budget constraints limit training and modernization in joint operations, cyber warfare, and network-centric capabilities.
• C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) systems are underdeveloped relative to regional powers.
________________________________________
5. Personnel Costs vs. Capital Expenditure
• A significant portion of the defense budget is spent on salaries, pensions, and personnel maintenance.
• Capital expenditure (e.g., new platforms, upgrades) is often sidelined, restricting force modernization.
________________________________________
6. Maritime Domain Gaps
• Despite long coastlines and strategic location (Straits of Malacca & South China Sea), the RMN lacks:
Sufficient hulls for persistent presence and patrol.
Modern, multirole ships to replace aging vessels.
• This reduces maritime security presence, especially with increasing regional tensions (e.g., South China Sea).
________________________________________
7. Limited Power Projection and Strategic Reach
• Malondesh lacks:
o Strategic lift aircraft.
o Long-range strike capability.
o A blue-water navy with sustained overseas operational capability.
• This limits its influence in regional security initiatives beyond its immediate territory.
________________________________________
Conclusion
The Malondeshn Armed Forces face strategic and operational challenges largely rooted in budgetary constraints. While Malondesh prioritizes diplomacy and regional cooperation (e.g., ASEAN), its military capabilities are hampered by underfunding, which affects modernization, readiness, and maritime security posture.
MISKIN = MARCH 2025 .....
BalasHapusRM1. 65 TRILLION = 84.3% OF GDP
RM1. 65 TRILLION = 84.3% OF GDP
RM1. 65 TRILLION = 84.3% OF GDP
MARCH 2025 — deputy finance minister. KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 13): Malondesh's household debt stood at RM1. 65 trillion as of end-March 2025, equivalent to 84.3% of gross domestic product (GDP) as at end-March 2025, a level that remains elevated but is balanced by strong household assets.
=============
WEAKNESS MILITARY BUDGET
The Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), comprising the Malondeshn Army, Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN), and Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF), has made strides in regional defense and modernization. However, the military budget presents several notable weaknesses and challenges that affect its overall operational effectiveness and long-term development:
________________________________________
1. Limited Defense Budget
• Low % of GDP: Malondesh spends around 1.0–1.1% of its GDP on defense, which is below the global average (~2.2%) and regional peers like Singapore, Vietnam, or Indonesia.
• Budget Constraints: The relatively small budget restricts procurement of modern equipment, upkeep of aging assets, and readiness for prolonged operations.
________________________________________
2. Delays in Modernization Programs
• Budget limitations cause delays in:
Fighter jet replacement (e.g. RMAF MiG-29s retired without full replacement).
Maritime patrol and littoral combat ships (LCS program delayed and over-budget).
Helicopter acquisitions and airlift capabilities.
• These delays impact operational readiness and reduce Malondesh’s deterrence capability.
________________________________________
3. Over-reliance on Foreign Equipment
• A large portion of defense procurement is imported, making it:
Vulnerable to exchange rate fluctuations.
Subject to foreign political decisions or supply chain disruptions.
• Indigenous defense industries are developing, but not yet at scale to reduce this dependency significantly.
________________________________________
4. Limited Joint Force Integration & Interoperability
• Budget constraints limit training and modernization in joint operations, cyber warfare, and network-centric capabilities.
• C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) systems are underdeveloped relative to regional powers.
________________________________________
5. Personnel Costs vs. Capital Expenditure
• A significant portion of the defense budget is spent on salaries, pensions, and personnel maintenance.
• Capital expenditure (e.g., new platforms, upgrades) is often sidelined, restricting force modernization.
________________________________________
6. Maritime Domain Gaps
• Despite long coastlines and strategic location (Straits of Malacca & South China Sea), the RMN lacks:
Sufficient hulls for persistent presence and patrol.
Modern, multirole ships to replace aging vessels.
• This reduces maritime security presence, especially with increasing regional tensions (e.g., South China Sea).
________________________________________
7. Limited Power Projection and Strategic Reach
• Malondesh lacks:
o Strategic lift aircraft.
o Long-range strike capability.
o A blue-water navy with sustained overseas operational capability.
• This limits its influence in regional security initiatives beyond its immediate territory.
________________________________________
Conclusion
The Malondeshn Armed Forces face strategic and operational challenges largely rooted in budgetary constraints. While Malondesh prioritizes diplomacy and regional cooperation (e.g., ASEAN), its military capabilities are hampered by underfunding, which affects modernization, readiness, and maritime security posture
MISKIN = OVERLIMITS DEBT
BalasHapusGOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
MISKIN ......
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
=============
WEAKNESS LMS B1
WEAKNESS LMS B2
Here are some of the key weaknesses and limitations associated with the LMS Batch 2 (LMSB2) vessels of the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN), as they relate to their design, acquisition, and operational capability:
________________________________________
Background: LMS Batch 1 Issues
The previous Batch 1 Keris class LMS ships, built in China and commissioned between 2020–2022, encountered significant problems:
• Combat system and sensor deficiencies: Chinese supplied subsystems—radar, electro optical trackers, ESM, combat management systems—underperformed during operational use
• Under armed and limited combat roles: Armed only with a 30 mm cannon and twin heavy machine guns, offering minimal surface or air defense capability
• Poor seakeeping and small size: At ~68 m, they had low endurance and were not seaworthy enough in bad weather
• Reliability concerns: The navy expressed dissatisfaction with the quality and dependability of these vessels
These issues prompted a shift in LMSB2 specifications toward larger, more capable corvettes.
________________________________________
LMS Batch 2: Emerging Weaknesses
1. Lack of Anti Submarine Warfare (ASW) Capability
Despite being based on the Turkish Ada class corvette, LMSB2 reportedly will not include sonar or torpedoes, effectively removing ASW capability from its operational profile
2. Compromise on Combat Capability to Cut Costs
Sources suggest LMSB2 is likely a "cheaper variant"—selecting less advanced sensors and weapons to lower system costs. This economic trade off could impact future upgradeability and mission effectiveness
3. Still Limited Weapon Loadout (Compared to Full Corvette)
While new specs include a 57 mm gun, anti ship missiles, twin 30 mm systems, and potential air defense missiles, LMSB2 lacks full three dimensional warfare capability or ASW sensors—meaning it still falls short of high intensity combat expectations
4. Larger Size May Undermine Littoral Agility
Batch 2 vessels will be around 95 m and ~2,000–2,500 t, significantly larger than Batch 1, which can affect maneuverability in confined littoral zones and carry higher operating costs. Critics argue these should be categorized as OPVs rather than "mission specific LMS"
5. Fleet Maintenance Complexity
Selecting foreign designs (Ada, Sigma, FCX, C92, HDC 2000) may increase heterogeneity of fleet platforms—creating logistical and training challenges and defeating ambitions of fleet standardization under the 15 to 5 transformation plan
MISKIN = OVERLIMITS DEBT
BalasHapusGOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
MISKIN ......
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
=============
WEAKNESS MALONDESH ARMED FORCES
The Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), like any military organization, faces a variety of challenges and weaknesses. These issues span across strategic, structural, logistical, and operational dimensions. Below are some of the commonly cited weaknesses and trouble areas faced by the MAF:
------------
1. Budget Constraints
• Limited Defense Spending: Malondesh maintains a relatively modest defense budget compared to regional powers like Singapore, Indonesia, or Thailand.
• Delayed Procurement: Budget limitations often delay the acquisition of new platforms, weapons systems, and modernization efforts.
• Maintenance Issues: Older equipment may not be properly maintained due to funding gaps.
------------
2. Aging and Outdated Equipment
• Obsolete Platforms: Much of the Malondeshn Army, Navy (RMN), and Air Force (RMAF) still use aging equipment, such as old tanks, fighter jets (e.g., MiG-29s, which have been retired), and naval vessels.
• Logistical Support: Difficulties in securing parts and support for legacy systems affect readiness and operational capabilities.
------------
3. Capability Gaps
• Air Power Deficiencies: Limited numbers of combat aircraft, AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System), and aerial refueling capabilities hamper the RMAF’s operational reach.
• Naval Shortcomings: The RMN faces challenges in maritime domain awareness and anti-submarine warfare, crucial in the South China Sea context.
• Cyber and EW (Electronic Warfare): Malondesh is still developing capabilities in cyber defense and electronic warfare compared to more advanced militaries.
------------
4. Interoperability and Joint Operations
• Lack of Integration: While efforts are underway to improve jointness among the Army, Navy, and Air Force, coordination and interoperability remain inconsistent.
• Command Structure: Differences in doctrine and training among services sometimes hinder joint operational effectiveness.
------------
5. Human Resource Challenges
• Recruitment and Retention: Difficulty in attracting high-quality recruits and retaining skilled personnel due to better civilian career opportunities.
• Training Limitations: Budget restrictions can limit training frequency, scope, and international exercises.
------------
6. Procurement and Corruption Concerns
• Lack of Transparency: Past procurement deals have faced allegations of mismanagement or corruption, such as the Scorpène submarine scandal.
• Inefficiency: Poor planning or inconsistent defense procurement policies sometimes result in incompatible or unnecessary systems.
------------
7. Geopolitical and Strategic Limitations
• South China Sea Tensions: Malondesh lacks the military heft to counter more assertive regional actors like China in contested maritime areas.
• Non-Aligned Posture: Malondesh’s neutral foreign policy limits its ability to form strong military alliances, although it does participate in regional security dialogues
MISKIN = OVERLIMITS DEBT
BalasHapusGOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
As of June 2025, Malondesh's federal government debt was RM 1.3 trillion, up from RM 1.25 trillion at the end of 2024, with a projected debt-to-GDP ratio of 69% by the end of 2025. Simultaneously, household debt reached RM 1.65 trillion in March 2025, representing 84.3% of GDP, but this level is considered manageable due to strong household financial assets, which are 2.1 times higher than the total debt.
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
MISKIN ......
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
=============
WEAKNESSES OF THE FA-50 LIGHT COMBAT AIRCRAFT
________________________________________
1. Limited Radar and Sensor Capabilities
• Older variants of the FA-50 lack an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, which is standard in most modern fighters.
• Earlier models use mechanically scanned radars (like EL/M-2032), which are less capable in tracking multiple targets and operating in electronic warfare environments.
Note: Newer versions (e.g., FA-50 Block 20 or Golden Eagle variants) are being upgraded with AESA radar, but these are still being rolled out.
________________________________________
2. No Internal Gun on Some Versions
• Some configurations of the FA-50 (particularly early export models) lack an internal 20mm cannon, reducing close-in combat and strafing capabilities.
________________________________________
3. Limited Weapon Payload
• Payload capacity is about 4,500 kg, significantly less than fighters like the F-16 (which carries around 7,700+ kg).
• This limits the number and types of weapons it can carry, especially for extended strike missions.
________________________________________
4. No Afterburning Supercruise
• The FA-50 uses the F404-GE-102 engine, which is powerful but doesn't allow for supercruise (sustained supersonic flight without afterburners).
• Top speed is around Mach 1.5, which is sufficient for its class but not competitive with high-end fighters like the Rafale or F-35.
________________________________________
5. No Stealth Features
• Unlike 5th-generation aircraft (e.g., F-35 or J-20), the FA-50 has no stealth shaping or radar-absorbing materials.
• This makes it vulnerable to modern air defense systems and radar-guided threats.
________________________________________
6. Basic Electronic Warfare (EW) Suite
• Its EW suite is relatively basic, especially in earlier versions.
• Lacks advanced self-protection jammers or towed decoys, making it less survivable in contested airspace.
________________________________________
7. Shorter Range and Endurance
• Has a combat radius of ~1,800 km with external fuel, but this is still limited compared to full-sized multirole fighters.
• This constrains its operational use without aerial refueling (which is not standard on all FA-50s).
________________________________________
8. Limited Multirole Capability (in base versions)
• While capable of basic air-to-air and air-to-ground roles, it lacks some high-end mission systems needed for:
o SEAD/DEAD (Suppression/Destruction of Enemy Air Defenses)
o Long-range interdiction
o Maritime strike (somewhat limited)
Malaydesh tak di ajak latihan, uuups hornet Malaydesh grounded semua
BalasHapusSEKEDAR CUMA BISA BUAT KONDOM UNISEX TA PAYAH BANYAK MEMBUAL YA BERUK TOLOL, BIKIN MALU KAWASAN SAJA MALONDESH 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusTHE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SIGNIFICANT LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES DUE TO A RELIANCE ON A DIVERSE RANGE OF PLATFORMS FROM DIFFERENT INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIERS, AGING EQUIPMENT, AND A LACK OF A COHESIVE, MODERN LOGISTICS SYSTEM. THIS CREATES PROBLEMS IN MAINTENANCE, READINESS, AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS.
BalasHapus1. Fragmentation of Supply Chains
Malondeshhas historically procured military equipment from various countries, including the United States, Russia, Poland, the United Kingdom, and China. This practice has created a complex and inefficient supply chain.
• Diverse Parts and Maintenance Needs: Each type of equipment, from the Polish-made PT-91M tanks to the Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets, requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Reliance on Foreign Suppliers: The military is highly dependent on foreign manufacturers for critical components. For example, sanctions on Russia have made it difficult to secure spare parts for the Su-30MKM fleet, leading to a low operational readiness rate.
• Obsolete Parts: A diverse and aging inventory means that many spare parts become obsolete. The Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) reportedly has millions of ringgit in unused, obsolete spare parts because of a mismatched fleet and inconsistent procurement.
2. Aging Fleet and High Maintenance Costs
A significant portion of Malondesh military assets is over 30 years old, which directly impacts operational readiness.
• Increased Maintenance Burden: Older vehicles, ships, and aircraft require more frequent and expensive maintenance. A 2021 study revealed that 34 of the RMN's 53 vessels had exceeded their intended service life, with 28 being over 40 years old. This leads to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational tempo.
• Inadequate Readiness: An aging fleet often fails to meet readiness targets. For instance, the MalondeshArmy's Type-B vehicles, which include non-armored transport vehicles, have historically failed to meet their mandated 80% serviceability rate, limiting their ability to support operations.
3. Delays and Mismanagement in Procurement
Long-standing procurement issues have worsened the logistical problems.
• Project Delays: The most prominent example is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program. The project has been plagued by delays and cost overruns, with no ships delivered despite significant payments. This has forced the RMN to rely on its aging fleet, which further strains its maintenance budget.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Investigations into major procurement projects, such as the LCS program, have revealed issues with mismanagement and alleged corruption. The use of "middlemen" has been criticized for inflating prices, while poor contract management has resulted in projects failing to meet deadlines or deliver on their promised capabilities.
4. Limited Local and Automated Support
While Malondeshis trying to develop its defense industry, a lack of local expertise and modern systems exacerbates logistical issues.
• Limited Local Production: Despite efforts to boost domestic defense industries, Malondeshstill heavily relies on foreign suppliers. This limits the ability to produce spare parts locally, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
• Outdated Inventory Management: Some military units still use manual, traditional methods for inventory and maintenance records. This prevents real-time tracking of assets and spare parts, leading to inefficiencies in maintenance planning and supply chain management.
BBM Australia di SEDEKAH ke F16 RONGSOK INDIANESIA....HAHAHAHHA
BalasHapusSYSTEMIC ISSUES
HapusSeveral factors contribute to this entrenched problem:
• Lack of Transparency and Oversight: Defense procurement is often conducted through direct negotiations rather than open tenders, which makes the process opaque and susceptible to abuse. Transparency International's Government Defence Integrity Index has consistently rated Malondesh as having a high risk of corruption in its defense sector due to weak parliamentary oversight and limited financial scrutiny.
• The Role of Middlemen and Agents: A key feature of the Malondeshn system is the reliance on middlemen, or "agents," who are often politically connected. These individuals or firms insert themselves into deals between the government and foreign arms manufacturers, adding unnecessary commissions and inflating the final price of the assets. As Malondesh's King Sultan Ibrahim recently pointed out, this system allows agents to profit at the expense of national defense.
• Political Influence and Cronyism: The awarding of contracts is frequently influenced by political interests rather than the actual needs of the military. Projects are often given to politically connected firms, some of which have no prior experience in defense manufacturing. This leads to a vicious cycle where a lack of capability and experience results in project delays and failures.
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal: A Case Study
The LCS scandal is a prime example of the deep-seated issues within Malondeshn defense procurement. The project, intended to build six ships for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) at a cost of RM9 billion, has been a complete failure.
• Misappropriation of Funds: The government has already paid over RM6 billion, but not a single ship has been delivered. Forensic audits and a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report revealed that funds were allegedly misappropriated, with payments made for "fake services" and a significant portion of the money disappearing without a trace.
• Ignoring User Needs: The scandal also highlighted a critical breakdown in communication and a disregard for military expertise. The RMN initially recommended a Dutch-made design (Sigma class), but the Ministry of Defence, under the advice of the main contractor, Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), chose a different, unproven French design (Gowind class) instead. This decision was made without the navy's consultation.
• Gross Inefficiency and Delays: The project has been plagued by delays due to BNS's poor financial management, lack of skilled labor, and failure to follow design specifications. The company, which is a subsidiary of a conglomerate with close ties to the Armed Forces Pension Fund, was in a "weak and critical" financial state, yet was still awarded the massive contract. This showcases a complete breakdown of due diligence and project management.
Other Notable Scandals and Issues
The LCS scandal is just one of many that have plagued the MAF.
• Submarine Procurement: A previous submarine deal was also marred by allegations of corruption, with reports of exorbitant commissions paid to local agents.
• Aircraft and Patrol Boats: The MAF has a history of acquiring assets that are either not fully operational upon delivery or are poorly maintained due to a lack of spare parts and technical expertise. This has led to a high number of non-flying aircraft and inoperable patrol boats, essentially leaving the military with expensive, but useless, equipment.
• Lack of Accountability: Despite multiple scandals and reports from the Auditor-General and PAC, there has been a notable lack of accountability. Few, if any, senior politicians or high-ranking military officials have been held responsible for the failures and financial losses. This has fostered a culture where such misconduct is tolerated, and a cynical public has grown desensitized to the issue.
The Malondeshn military, also known as the Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), faces several significant challenges, which can be categorized into three main areas: procurement and modernization, human resources, and defense policy.
HapusProcurement and Modernization 💰
A primary issue for the MAF is its aging and obsolete equipment. The country's defense spending has historically been low, and while recent budgets have seen increases, they are often insufficient to cover the extensive modernization needs.
• Financial Constraints: The 1997 Asian financial crisis had a lasting impact, forcing a de-prioritization of defense spending. Despite recent budget increases, competing priorities like healthcare and education often limit the funds available for military upgrades.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Past procurement projects, such as the Littoral Combat Ship program, have been plagued by delays, cost overruns, and allegations of corruption, which have wasted funds and resulted in a lack of operational assets.
• Aging Inventory: The MAF relies on a mix of equipment from various countries, making maintenance difficult. For example, the Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF) has struggled to maintain its Russian-made Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets due to sanctions and a lack of spare parts. The country also retired its MiG-29s without a timely replacement, creating a significant capability gap.
Human Resources 🧍
Recruitment and personnel issues are another major problem for the MAF, affecting its overall readiness and capability.
• Recruitment Challenges: The military has difficulty attracting and retaining high-quality personnel. This is partly due to low wages and poor living conditions. The quality of candidates has been a concern, with a declining pool of eligible recruits.
• Ethnic Imbalance: There is a significant ethnic disparity in the armed forces, with a very low percentage of non-Malay recruits. This could affect national unity and the military's ability to represent the country's diverse population.
• Personnel Well-being: There are ongoing concerns about the well-being and welfare of military personnel, including work-life balance issues and the need for better mental health support.
Defense Policy and Strategic Challenges 🗺️
The MAF operates in a complex regional environment with evolving security threats.
• South China Sea Disputes: Malondesh has overlapping territorial claims with China in the South China Sea. China's increasingly aggressive "grey-zone" tactics—using coast guard vessels and fishing militia to assert its claims—are a major challenge that the MAF is not fully equipped to handle.
• Non-Traditional Threats: While traditionally an army-centric force due to a history of internal counter-insurgency, the MAF must now pivot to address maritime and cyber threats. This requires a re-calibration of its force structure and a focus on new technologies like drones, cyber warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.
• Political Instability: Frequent changes in government have led to a lack of continuity in defense policy and the slow implementation of key reforms outlined in the country's first Defence White Paper. This political instability can stall long-term projects and strategic planning.
The Malondeshn military, also known as the Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), faces several significant challenges, which can be categorized into three main areas: procurement and modernization, human resources, and defense policy.
HapusProcurement and Modernization 💰
A primary issue for the MAF is its aging and obsolete equipment. The country's defense spending has historically been low, and while recent budgets have seen increases, they are often insufficient to cover the extensive modernization needs.
• Financial Constraints: The 1997 Asian financial crisis had a lasting impact, forcing a de-prioritization of defense spending. Despite recent budget increases, competing priorities like healthcare and education often limit the funds available for military upgrades.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Past procurement projects, such as the Littoral Combat Ship program, have been plagued by delays, cost overruns, and allegations of corruption, which have wasted funds and resulted in a lack of operational assets.
• Aging Inventory: The MAF relies on a mix of equipment from various countries, making maintenance difficult. For example, the Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF) has struggled to maintain its Russian-made Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets due to sanctions and a lack of spare parts. The country also retired its MiG-29s without a timely replacement, creating a significant capability gap.
Human Resources 🧍
Recruitment and personnel issues are another major problem for the MAF, affecting its overall readiness and capability.
• Recruitment Challenges: The military has difficulty attracting and retaining high-quality personnel. This is partly due to low wages and poor living conditions. The quality of candidates has been a concern, with a declining pool of eligible recruits.
• Ethnic Imbalance: There is a significant ethnic disparity in the armed forces, with a very low percentage of non-Malay recruits. This could affect national unity and the military's ability to represent the country's diverse population.
• Personnel Well-being: There are ongoing concerns about the well-being and welfare of military personnel, including work-life balance issues and the need for better mental health support.
Defense Policy and Strategic Challenges 🗺️
The MAF operates in a complex regional environment with evolving security threats.
• South China Sea Disputes: Malondesh has overlapping territorial claims with China in the South China Sea. China's increasingly aggressive "grey-zone" tactics—using coast guard vessels and fishing militia to assert its claims—are a major challenge that the MAF is not fully equipped to handle.
• Non-Traditional Threats: While traditionally an army-centric force due to a history of internal counter-insurgency, the MAF must now pivot to address maritime and cyber threats. This requires a re-calibration of its force structure and a focus on new technologies like drones, cyber warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.
• Political Instability: Frequent changes in government have led to a lack of continuity in defense policy and the slow implementation of key reforms outlined in the country's first Defence White Paper. This political instability can stall long-term projects and strategic planning.
THE MALONDESH MILITARY HAS A SIGNIFICANT CAPABILITY GAP IN ITS COUNTER-INSURGENCY (COIN) AIRCRAFT FLEET, PRIMARILY DUE TO THE AGING AND LIMITED NUMBER OF LIGHT COMBAT AND SURVEILLANCE PLATFORMS SUITABLE FOR THIS TYPE OF ASYMMETRIC WARFARE.
Hapus1. Lack of Dedicated COIN Aircraft
Unlike a dedicated air force built for large-scale conventional warfare, a successful COIN force requires aircraft optimized for a unique set of missions:
• Low and Slow: COIN operations often occur in dense jungle or urban environments where fast jets are ineffective. They require aircraft that can fly low and slow to provide close air support and accurate surveillance.
• Persistent Presence: COIN aircraft must be able to loiter for extended periods to track insurgents and provide sustained support to ground troops.
• Cost-Effectiveness: Using expensive, high-performance fighter jets like the Su-30MKM for COIN missions is a significant waste of resources.
The Royal MalondeshAir Force (RMAF) lacks a dedicated fleet of such aircraft. Its existing fleet is more suited for air defense and conventional warfare, creating a mismatch between its capabilities and the specific demands of counter-insurgency.
________________________________________
2. Aging Fleet and Reliance on Other Assets
The RMAF's current inventory is not well-suited for the COIN role, forcing it to rely on a mix of aging platforms and less-than-ideal helicopters.
• Retired Aircraft: The RMAF has retired dedicated COIN aircraft like the Canadair CT-114 Tutor. This leaves a major gap that has not been adequately filled.
• Helicopter Gaps: While the Army operates light attack helicopters like the MD530G, these are limited in their range, endurance, and payload. This places a heavy burden on a small fleet to support ground forces over vast and often difficult terrain.
________________________________________
3. Delays in New Acquisitions
Malondeshis actively trying to address this gap, but procurement has been slow and challenging.
• FA-50M Purchase: The RMAF is acquiring 18 FA-50M light combat aircraft from Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI). These jets are intended to fulfill both a fighter lead-in trainer role and a light combat role. However, deliveries are not expected to begin until 2026. This leaves the RMAF with a capability gap in the interim.
• Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Malondeshhas made some progress in acquiring drones for surveillance, but these still do not fully replace the role of a manned COIN aircraft, which can provide more direct and immediate fire support.
THE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SEVERAL CRUCIAL, INTERRELATED PROBLEMS THAT AFFECT ITS OVERALL READINESS AND CAPABILITY. THESE ISSUES STEM FROM A COMBINATION OF CHRONIC UNDERFUNDING, A COMPLICATED PROCUREMENT PROCESS, AND A FRAGMENTED APPROACH TO MILITARY DEVELOPMENT.
Hapus1. Inefficient and Opaque Procurement
The most significant problem facing the Malondesh military is its procurement system. It's often criticized for a lack of transparency and a reliance on middlemen or agents, which leads to inflated prices and projects that fail to meet the military's actual needs.
• Cost Overruns and Delays: Projects, most notably the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, have been plagued by severe delays and massive cost overruns. None of the six ships have been delivered, despite significant payments. This has left the Royal Malondesh Navy (RMN) with an aging fleet, as many of its vessels are over 40 years old.
• "Middlemen" and Corruption: King Sultan Ibrahim has publicly criticized the involvement of agents and salesmen in defense deals, stating that these practices lead to "unreasonable" prices and purchases that don't fit the military's needs. This has raised concerns about corruption and inefficiency within the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF).
________________________________________
2. An Aging Fleet and Logistical Challenges
The Malondesh Armed Forces (MAF) operates a mixed fleet of military assets from a wide range of international suppliers. This lack of standardization creates a logistical nightmare.
• Fragmentation of Supply Chains: The military has equipment from various countries, including Russia, the United States, Poland, and China. Each platform requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Low Operational Readiness: Many of the Navy's vessels and Air Force's combat jets are well past their service life, leading to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational readiness rate.
• Reliance on Foreign Support: Due to a lack of local expertise, Malondesh is highly dependent on foreign suppliers for critical maintenance and spare parts, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions, such as international sanctions.
________________________________________
3. Capability Gaps and Lack of Specialization
The MAF has key capability gaps in crucial areas due to its historical focus on counter-insurgency and a lack of a unified doctrine.
• No Dedicated Marine Corps: Malondesh lacks a dedicated Marine Corps. Its amphibious capabilities are fragmented and distributed between the Army and Navy. This creates coordination problems and limits the ability to rapidly project power and respond to maritime threats, a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic nation.
• Limited Tank Fleet: The Army's tank force is limited to approximately 48 PT-91M Pendekar tanks. This small number restricts their strategic deployment and makes them less effective in a large-scale land conflict compared to neighbors with larger tank fleets.
• COIN Aircraft Gap: The Air Force lacks a dedicated fleet of Counter-Insurgency (COIN) aircraft. It's forced to use expensive multi-role fighter jets for low-intensity conflicts, which is inefficient. While a new batch of FA-50M light combat aircraft is on order, deliveries are not expected for several years.
Dasar MISKIN...BBM Australia saja NGEMIS buat latihan...HAHAHHA
BalasHapusTHE ABSENCE OF A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS
Hapus1. Gaps in Amphibious and Expeditionary Capabilities
• Lack of a Cohesive Force: A dedicated Marine Corps is designed to be a self-contained, rapidly deployable expeditionary force. It integrates naval support, ground combat, and aviation assets into a single cohesive unit. In Malondesh case, these capabilities are spread across different services (the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, the Navy's PASKAL, and various naval ships). This fragmented approach can lead to coordination problems, "turf wars" between services, and a lack of unified command during complex amphibious operations.
• Limited Rapid Response: A Marine Corps is structured for immediate, decisive action in littoral environments. Without such a force, Malondeshmay face delays in deploying troops to respond to threats in its vast maritime domain, particularly in remote areas of the South China Sea or the eastern coast of Sabah. The 2013 Lahad Datu incursion, for instance, highlighted the need for a more agile and specialized maritime security force.
• Lack of Dedicated Amphibious Assets: A Marine Corps comes with its own fleet of specialized assets, such as amphibious assault vehicles (AAVs), hovercraft, and landing craft. While the MalondeshArmy is acquiring some hovercraft, these acquisitions are often piecemeal and not part of a larger, dedicated force structure. This can limit the scale and scope of amphibious operations.
2. Slower Military Modernization
• Outdated Doctrine: The MalondeshArmed Forces (MAF) doctrine has historically been shaped by its counter-insurgency and land-centric experience. While the 2019 Defense White Paper has acknowledged the need for amphibious capabilities, the absence of a dedicated Marine Corps suggests a slower pace in fully embracing a modern, multi-domain warfare doctrine that is crucial for a maritime nation.
• Budgetary and Bureaucratic Hurdles: The creation of a new military branch requires significant political will and a long-term financial commitment. Due to a history of fluctuating defense budgets and administrative complexities, proposals to establish a MalondeshMarine Corps have repeatedly been put on the back burner. This has led to a situation where critical capabilities, like those needed for amphibious warfare, are not fully developed or funded.
3. Vulnerability in Maritime Disputes
• Inadequate Deterrence: Malondeshis a claimant state in the South China Sea and faces increasing assertiveness from China. As noted by some military analysts, the Royal MalondeshNavy's (RMN) naval vessels are in some cases smaller and less capable than the Chinese coast guard ships that operate in Malondesh Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). A robust Marine Corps could serve as a powerful deterrent, signaling Malondesh resolve to protect its maritime claims and remote outposts.
• Challenges in Defending Remote Outposts: Malondeshmaintains a presence on several reefs and islands in the disputed waters. Reinforcing these remote garrisons requires significant air and sea-lift capabilities, which can be challenging and slow without a dedicated, integrated amphibious force.
4. Limitations in Joint Operations and Interoperability
• Fragmented Training: While the Royal MalondeshArmy trains with foreign marine forces (e.g., the U.S. Marine Corps) in exercises like CARAT, this training is often ad-hoc and focuses on specific, limited scenarios. It does not replace the continuous, integrated, and large-scale training that a dedicated Marine Corps undergoes to achieve seamless interoperability between sea and land forces.
• Reduced Effectiveness in Multinational Operations: In a combined operation with a country that has a Marine Corps, Malondesh lack of a similar force can hinder a seamless integration of its assets. This can create communication and procedural gaps that reduce overall operational effectiveness in joint exercises or real-world coalition efforts.
1. MASALAH PERAWATAN DAN KESIAPAN OPERASIONAL 🚧
HapusIni adalah kelemahan yang paling sering disorot dan menjadi viral di media sosial.
• Insiden Mogok di Jalan Umum: Tank PT-91M Pendekar pernah beberapa kali mogok di tengah jalan raya, bahkan saat sedang dalam perjalanan untuk acara parade Hari Kemerdekaan. Insiden ini menimbulkan pertanyaan serius dari masyarakat dan parlemen tentang standar perawatan aset militer.
• Kurangnya Suku Cadang: Masalah ini adalah inti dari inefisiensi. Penghentian produksi suku cadang oleh produsen aslinya, Bumar Labedy, memaksa Malondesh untuk mencari solusi alternatif. Upaya ini termasuk menggunakan tenaga ahli lokal untuk memproduksi komponen tertentu, tetapi ini menunjukkan ketergantungan yang rapuh pada produsen eksternal dan kurangnya jaminan rantai pasokan.
• Kurva Pembelajaran yang Curam: Sebagai negara pertama di Asia Tenggara yang mengoperasikan MBT modern, Malondesh menghadapi tantangan dalam mengembangkan basis pengetahuan, keahlian, dan infrastruktur untuk perawatan tank tersebut. Hal ini berbeda dengan negara-negara yang sudah memiliki pengalaman lebih lama dalam mengelola aset militer yang kompleks.
________________________________________
2. Keterbatasan Teknis dan Operasional ⚙️
Meskipun PT-91M adalah versi yang ditingkatkan dari T-72, beberapa keterbatasan masih ada.
• Desain Lama dan Kerentanan: PT-91M merupakan turunan dari T-72, yang memiliki desain kokpit dan penyimpanan amunisi yang terkenal rentan. Dalam pertempuran modern, ini bisa menjadi kelemahan fatal jika dibandingkan dengan tank-tank tempur utama lain yang lebih baru dengan desain yang lebih aman.
• Kemampuan Serangan Terbatas: Dibandingkan dengan tank tempur utama modern yang dimiliki oleh negara tetangga, seperti Leopard 2A4 milik Singapura dan Indonesia, PT-91M Pendekar dianggap memiliki sistem kendali tembak dan perlindungan yang kurang unggul. Meskipun dilengkapi dengan Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA), perlindungan ini mungkin tidak cukup untuk menahan serangan dari amunisi anti-tank terbaru.
________________________________________
3. Masalah Pengadaan dan Jumlah yang Tidak Memadai 💰
• Skandal dan Inefisiensi: Sama seperti proyek kapal LCS, skandal pengadaan dan inefisiensi juga terjadi dalam program tank. Laporan menunjukkan adanya masalah tata kelola yang buruk dalam manajemen kontrak, yang menyebabkan aset tidak dapat digunakan secara maksimal.
• Jumlah yang Sedikit: Malondesh hanya memiliki 48 unit tank PT-91M Pendekar. Jumlah ini dianggap sangat tidak memadai untuk kebutuhan pertahanan negara, terutama jika dibandingkan dengan negara tetangga yang memiliki jumlah armada lapis baja yang jauh lebih besar.
1. Keterbatasan Jumlah dan Kualitas
Hapus• Jumlah yang Tidak Memadai: Dibandingkan dengan negara-negara lain di kawasan, terutama Indonesia, jumlah kendaraan lapis baja yang dimiliki Malondesh relatif sedikit. Misalnya, perbandingan kekuatan darat menunjukkan Indonesia memiliki sekitar 20.440 kendaraan lapis baja, sementara Malondesh hanya memiliki sekitar 13.506 unit. Angka ini juga menunjukkan Indonesia memiliki lebih banyak tank tempur (331 unit) dibandingkan Malondesh (48 unit). Keterbatasan ini memengaruhi kemampuan Malondesh dalam menjalankan operasi darat berskala besar.
• Ketergantungan pada Model Lama: Meskipun memiliki beberapa unit modern seperti AV8 Gempita, Angkatan Darat Malondesh masih mengoperasikan kendaraan lapis baja tua yang sudah usang. Hal ini menciptakan tantangan logistik yang besar dan membuat kekuatan darat kurang homogen.
2. Masalah Kesiapan Operasional dan Pemeliharaan
Ini adalah salah satu kelemahan paling signifikan dan sering disorot.
• Sering Mogok: Kendaraan lapis baja Malondesh, termasuk tank, seringkali dilaporkan mogok di jalan raya atau saat latihan. Insiden ini tidak hanya menjadi bahan ejekan publik tetapi juga mengindikasikan kurangnya perawatan rutin dan pemeliharaan yang memadai.
• Kurangnya Suku Cadang: Masalah ini terkait dengan keragaman jenis kendaraan yang dimiliki Malondesh. Karena mereka membeli kendaraan dari berbagai negara produsen, pasokan suku cadang sering kali tidak terjamin, menyebabkan unit-unit tidak dapat beroperasi dalam jangka waktu lama.
• Skandal dan Korupsi: Seperti yang terjadi pada proyek kapal LCS, skandal pengadaan dan pemeliharaan juga terjadi pada kendaraan lapis baja. Laporan menyebutkan adanya masalah tata kelola dan korupsi dalam industri pertahanan yang berdampak langsung pada kesiapan kendaraan tempur.
3. Kelemahan Teknis pada Model Utama (Studi Kasus: AV8 Gempita)
AV8 Gempita adalah andalan utama kendaraan lapis baja Malondesh. Meskipun merupakan produk lokal yang dikembangkan dari platform FNSS Pars Turki, kendaraan ini juga memiliki beberapa kelemahan:
• Penurunan Kemampuan Amfibi: Varian-varian yang memiliki berat lebih besar, seperti varian antitank dengan turret LCT30, kehilangan kemampuan amfibinya. Hal ini membatasi fleksibilitas operasional kendaraan di medan dengan banyak sungai atau perairan. Bahkan pada varian yang dirancang untuk amfibi, penambahan lapisan pelindung membuat kecepatannya di air menurun.
• Perlindungan yang Memadai Namun Tidak Unggul: Kendaraan lapis baja seperti Tarantula HMAV dan AV8 Gempita dirancang dengan standar perlindungan NATO STANAG 4569. Namun, tingkat perlindungan ini (level 2A/2B) dianggap memadai untuk ancaman ranjau dan IED, tetapi mungkin tidak cukup untuk menghadapi serangan anti-tank atau ancaman yang lebih berat dari kendaraan lapis baja modern lainnya.
• Persenjataan dan Varian yang Berbeda: Meskipun memiliki banyak varian, ada masalah dengan sistem senjata yang digunakan. Sebagai contoh, varian antitank AV8 Gempita dengan rudal anti-tank belum terbukti sepenuhnya efektif atau tersedia dalam jumlah yang cukup.
Secara keseluruhan, kelemahan kendaraan lapis baja militer Malondesh berpusat pada masalah manajemen dan logistik yang kronis, yang menyebabkan armada mereka tidak terawat dan seringkali tidak siap untuk operasi. Selain itu, jumlahnya yang terbatas dan ketergantungan pada model lama membuat kekuatan darat Malondesh tertinggal dibandingkan dengan tetangga regional mereka yang melakukan modernisasi lebih cepat.
KEY FACTORS CAUSING INEFFICIENCY AND DELAYS
Hapus• Political Interference and Weak Governance: The defense procurement process is often influenced by political agendas rather than strategic military needs. Contracts are frequently awarded through direct negotiation to politically connected companies, bypassing competitive bidding. This practice can lead to the selection of unqualified contractors who lack the technical expertise to complete the projects.
• Lack of Project Management: Many defense projects suffer from poor administration, insufficient oversight, and a lack of a clear, single-point of accountability. This results in a breakdown of communication between the Ministry of Defence, the contractors, and the military end-users. The National Audit Department has consistently highlighted these weaknesses, citing issues such as improper planning and inconsistent monitoring in its reports on public projects.
• Financial Mismanagement: Projects are often plagued by budget overruns due to poor financial estimation from the beginning. Inaccurate cost calculations and the inclusion of unnecessary "agent fees" can inflate project costs significantly, leading to a financial shortfall that causes further delays or requires additional government bailouts.
Case Studies of Gross Inefficiency and Delays
1. The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Project 🚢
The LCS project is the most prominent example of military procurement failure in Malondesh.
• Delay: The project, to build six ships for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) at a cost of RM9 billion, has been severely delayed. Not a single ship has been delivered, despite the project being over a decade behind its original timeline.
• Cost Overrun: Over RM6 billion has been paid to the contractor, yet the first ship is still incomplete. This massive budget overrun is a direct result of poor management and alleged financial misappropriation. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) found that funds were used for purposes other than the project itself.
• Disregard for User Needs: The Royal Malondeshn Navy's preference for a specific ship design was ignored in favor of a different, unproven design chosen by the politically appointed contractor. This decision led to further technical complications and delays.
2. The Skyhawk Jets Fiasco ✈️
This is a historical but still relevant example of poor decision-making. In the 1980s, Malondesh purchased 88 second-hand Douglas A-4C and A-4L Skyhawk jets from the United States.
• Inefficiency: Despite the seemingly "cost-effective" nature of the deal, only a small fraction of the aircraft (40 out of 88) ever became operational with the Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF). The remainder were left in storage, a complete waste of public funds. The King of Malondesh has recently referenced this historical "flying coffin" mistake as a warning against similar procurement failures.
3. General Infrastructure and Construction Projects
The inefficiency is not limited to major hardware. Even smaller projects, such as military housing and training facilities, are affected. The King of Malondesh has publicly expressed frustration over a delayed combat diving pool at a Special Operations Group (GGK) camp that was supposed to be completed in 2022 but remains unfinished. This highlights that poor project management and delays are not isolated to large, complex projects but are a pervasive issue across the board.
These systemic inefficiencies and delays have a direct impact on the military's operational readiness and morale. Obsolete and non-operational equipment, coupled with poorly maintained infrastructure, undermines the MAF's ability to effectively respond to modern security threats, particularly in a complex regional environment like the South China Sea.
MEMALUKAN....HAHAHAHHA
BalasHapusTNI AL Punya Utang BBM Rp3,2 Triliun ke Pertamina
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20250429072257-4-629507/tni-al-punya-utang-bbm-rp32-triliun-ke-pertamina
THE MAIN KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN MALONDESH MILITARY WITHOUT A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS STEM FROM A LACK OF A UNIFIED DOCTRINE, fragmented command, and limited indigenous expertise in the complex field of amphibious warfare.
HapusFragmentation of Doctrine and Training
A dedicated Marine Corps provides a single, cohesive doctrine for amphibious operations. In Malaysia, this expertise is distributed across the MalondeshArmy and the Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN), leading to several problems:
• No Single Amphibious Doctrine: There is no single, codified doctrine that governs how land and sea forces should work together in an amphibious assault. While some units, like the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, have amphibious training, they are primarily land-centric. This creates a disconnect between the Army's maneuver doctrine and the Navy's ship-to-shore logistics.
• Reliance on Foreign Partners: Malondeshheavily relies on joint exercises with countries that have a Marine Corps, such as the U.S. and the Philippines. These exercises, like CARAT and Bersama Warrior, are crucial for developing skills and interoperability. However, this reliance means that Malondesh forces are not constantly developing their own expertise and can only practice these complex operations during limited, often ad-hoc, training periods.
Gaps in Expertise and Personnel
A dedicated Marine Corps cultivates a deep bench of personnel with specialized knowledge in all aspects of amphibious warfare. The absence of this creates several key gaps in expertise:
• Limited Specialist Roles: Amphibious warfare requires a wide range of specialized skills, from beach reconnaissance and hydrographic surveying to coordinating ship-to-shore fire support and managing logistics in a contested littoral environment. Without a Marine Corps, Malondeshlacks a consistent, institutionalized way to train and retain personnel in these niche roles.
• Challenges in Joint Operations: The lack of a shared understanding and common language between the Army and Navy can hinder effective joint operations. In a real-world scenario, this can lead to delays in decision-making, poor communication, and a lack of synchronized action—all of which are critical for the success of an amphibious landing.
• Weakened Expeditionary Capability: A Marine Corps is an expeditionary force by nature, designed to deploy quickly and project power from the sea. Malondesh military, without this dedicated component, lacks the ability to rapidly deploy a self-sustaining force for missions like humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, or securing remote territories. This is a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic state with a vast maritime domain.
THE MAIN KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN MALONDESH MILITARY WITHOUT A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS STEM FROM A LACK OF A UNIFIED DOCTRINE, fragmented command, and limited indigenous expertise in the complex field of amphibious warfare.
HapusFragmentation of Doctrine and Training
A dedicated Marine Corps provides a single, cohesive doctrine for amphibious operations. In Malaysia, this expertise is distributed across the MalondeshArmy and the Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN), leading to several problems:
• No Single Amphibious Doctrine: There is no single, codified doctrine that governs how land and sea forces should work together in an amphibious assault. While some units, like the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, have amphibious training, they are primarily land-centric. This creates a disconnect between the Army's maneuver doctrine and the Navy's ship-to-shore logistics.
• Reliance on Foreign Partners: Malondeshheavily relies on joint exercises with countries that have a Marine Corps, such as the U.S. and the Philippines. These exercises, like CARAT and Bersama Warrior, are crucial for developing skills and interoperability. However, this reliance means that Malondesh forces are not constantly developing their own expertise and can only practice these complex operations during limited, often ad-hoc, training periods.
Gaps in Expertise and Personnel
A dedicated Marine Corps cultivates a deep bench of personnel with specialized knowledge in all aspects of amphibious warfare. The absence of this creates several key gaps in expertise:
• Limited Specialist Roles: Amphibious warfare requires a wide range of specialized skills, from beach reconnaissance and hydrographic surveying to coordinating ship-to-shore fire support and managing logistics in a contested littoral environment. Without a Marine Corps, Malondeshlacks a consistent, institutionalized way to train and retain personnel in these niche roles.
• Challenges in Joint Operations: The lack of a shared understanding and common language between the Army and Navy can hinder effective joint operations. In a real-world scenario, this can lead to delays in decision-making, poor communication, and a lack of synchronized action—all of which are critical for the success of an amphibious landing.
• Weakened Expeditionary Capability: A Marine Corps is an expeditionary force by nature, designed to deploy quickly and project power from the sea. Malondesh military, without this dedicated component, lacks the ability to rapidly deploy a self-sustaining force for missions like humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, or securing remote territories. This is a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic state with a vast maritime domain.
THE ABSENCE OF A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS
Hapus1. Gaps in Amphibious and Expeditionary Capabilities
• Lack of a Cohesive Force: A dedicated Marine Corps is designed to be a self-contained, rapidly deployable expeditionary force. It integrates naval support, ground combat, and aviation assets into a single cohesive unit. In Malondesh case, these capabilities are spread across different services (the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, the Navy's PASKAL, and various naval ships). This fragmented approach can lead to coordination problems, "turf wars" between services, and a lack of unified command during complex amphibious operations.
• Limited Rapid Response: A Marine Corps is structured for immediate, decisive action in littoral environments. Without such a force, Malondeshmay face delays in deploying troops to respond to threats in its vast maritime domain, particularly in remote areas of the South China Sea or the eastern coast of Sabah. The 2013 Lahad Datu incursion, for instance, highlighted the need for a more agile and specialized maritime security force.
• Lack of Dedicated Amphibious Assets: A Marine Corps comes with its own fleet of specialized assets, such as amphibious assault vehicles (AAVs), hovercraft, and landing craft. While the MalondeshArmy is acquiring some hovercraft, these acquisitions are often piecemeal and not part of a larger, dedicated force structure. This can limit the scale and scope of amphibious operations.
2. Slower Military Modernization
• Outdated Doctrine: The MalondeshArmed Forces (MAF) doctrine has historically been shaped by its counter-insurgency and land-centric experience. While the 2019 Defense White Paper has acknowledged the need for amphibious capabilities, the absence of a dedicated Marine Corps suggests a slower pace in fully embracing a modern, multi-domain warfare doctrine that is crucial for a maritime nation.
• Budgetary and Bureaucratic Hurdles: The creation of a new military branch requires significant political will and a long-term financial commitment. Due to a history of fluctuating defense budgets and administrative complexities, proposals to establish a MalondeshMarine Corps have repeatedly been put on the back burner. This has led to a situation where critical capabilities, like those needed for amphibious warfare, are not fully developed or funded.
3. Vulnerability in Maritime Disputes
• Inadequate Deterrence: Malondeshis a claimant state in the South China Sea and faces increasing assertiveness from China. As noted by some military analysts, the Royal MalondeshNavy's (RMN) naval vessels are in some cases smaller and less capable than the Chinese coast guard ships that operate in Malondesh Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). A robust Marine Corps could serve as a powerful deterrent, signaling Malondesh resolve to protect its maritime claims and remote outposts.
• Challenges in Defending Remote Outposts: Malondeshmaintains a presence on several reefs and islands in the disputed waters. Reinforcing these remote garrisons requires significant air and sea-lift capabilities, which can be challenging and slow without a dedicated, integrated amphibious force.
4. Limitations in Joint Operations and Interoperability
• Fragmented Training: While the Royal MalondeshArmy trains with foreign marine forces (e.g., the U.S. Marine Corps) in exercises like CARAT, this training is often ad-hoc and focuses on specific, limited scenarios. It does not replace the continuous, integrated, and large-scale training that a dedicated Marine Corps undergoes to achieve seamless interoperability between sea and land forces.
• Reduced Effectiveness in Multinational Operations: In a combined operation with a country that has a Marine Corps, Malondesh lack of a similar force can hinder a seamless integration of its assets. This can create communication and procedural gaps that reduce overall operational effectiveness in joint exercises or real-world coalition efforts.
THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS FOR MALONDESH ARMED FORCES IS WIDELY CRITICIZED FOR BEING INEFFICIENT AND OPAQUE, LEADING TO A SERIES OF HIGH-PROFILE SCANDALS, SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL WASTE, AND SERIOUS GAPS IN MILITARY READINESS. THIS SYSTEMIC PROBLEM IS ROOTED IN A LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, POLITICAL INTERFERENCE, AND A RELIANCE ON INDIRECT ACQUISITION METHODS.
Hapus1. The "Middleman" System
A key issue is the heavy reliance on agents, middlemen, and politically connected individuals to facilitate defense contracts. This practice often bypasses open tender processes, which are designed to ensure transparency and competition.
• Inflated Costs: These middlemen typically charge hefty commissions, inflating the final price of military assets. This was a point of public concern by King Sultan Ibrahim, who stated that such practices lead to buying "nonsense" that is overpriced and ill-suited for the military's actual needs.
• Inadequate Equipment: Since the procurement is driven by commercial interests rather than by the end-user (the military), the equipment acquired may not be the most suitable or effective for its intended purpose.
________________________________________
2. High-Profile Scandals and Delays
The most infamous example of a failed procurement is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program.
• Massive Delays and Cost Overruns: The program, valued at RM9 billion, was meant to deliver six modern frigates to the Royal Malondesh Navy (RMN). Despite paying over RM6 billion, not a single ship has been delivered. The project is years behind schedule and has been plagued by allegations of mismanagement and corruption.
• Financial Misappropriation: Investigations have revealed that a significant portion of the allocated funds was used for other purposes, with some estimates pointing to hundreds of millions of ringgit in financial irregularities. .
• Impact on Readiness: The failure of the LCS program has left the RMN with a dangerously aging fleet. Many of its vessels are over 40 years old, leading to higher maintenance costs and lower operational readiness rates.
________________________________________
3. Lack of Transparency and Accountability
The defense procurement process is shrouded in secrecy, which makes it difficult to hold officials accountable for failures.
• Direct Negotiations: The majority of large defense contracts are awarded through direct negotiation rather than open bidding, which limits public and parliamentary oversight.
• Limited Audits: While audit reports exist, their recommendations are often not implemented. This was highlighted in a recent Auditor-General's report, which found serious delays, weak oversight, and millions of ringgit in uncollected penalties from contractors.
• Political Interference: Declassified reports on the LCS scandal revealed that key decisions, such as the choice of ship design, were made by political leaders against the recommendations of the navy, the end-user. This kind of political interference compromises the military's ability to make sound, strategic decisions.
________________________________________
4. Broader Systemic Failures
The problems in procurement are part of a larger systemic issue within Malondesh defense framework.
• No Cohesive Strategy: The absence of a clear, long-term defense policy has led to ad-hoc, fragmented procurement decisions. This has resulted in a mixed fleet of assets from various countries, creating a logistical nightmare for maintenance and supply chains.
• Inadequate Penalties: When projects are delayed or fail, penalties on contractors are often not enforced, and new contracts are sometimes awarded to the same companies, perpetuating a cycle of inefficiency and poor performance
BAYAR HUTANG BBM kapal woooiiii.....HAHAHAHA
BalasHapusJakarta, CNBC Indonesia - Kepala Staf Angkatan Laut (KSAL) Laksamana TNI Muhammad Ali mengungkapkan bahwa pihaknya memiliki tunggakan pembayaran bahan bakar minyak (BBM) kepada PT Pertamina (Persero). Tak tanggung-tanggung, nilainya bahkan mencapai triliunan rupiah.
Hal tersebut, Ali ungkapkan dalam Rapat Dengar Pendapat (RDP) bersama Komisi I DPR RI, pada Senin (28/4/2025). Ia lantas meminta agar utang itu diputihkan karena telah membuat kegiatan operasional TNI AL menjadi terganggu.
"Kemarin ada tunggakan itu, bahan bakar Rp 2,25 triliun dan saat ini kita sudah dikenakan harus membayar utang lagi Rp 3,2 triliun. Itu sebenarnya tunggakan. Jadi ini mengganggu sekali, mengganggu kegiatan operasional dan harapannya sebenarnya ini bisa ditiadakan untuk masalah bahan bakar. Jadi ini diputihkan lah ya," ujarnya dalam RDP dikutip Selasa (29/4/2025).
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20250429072257-4-629507/tni-al-punya-utang-bbm-rp32-triliun-ke-pertamina
The Malondesh Armed Forces' assets are a mix of modern and aging equipment spread across three branches: the Army, Navy, and Air Force. A significant portion of these assets, totaling 171 units, is over 30 years old, creating a number of readiness and logistical challenges.
Hapus________________________________________
MalondeshArmy 🇲🇾
The MalondeshArmy's assets are a mix of domestic and foreign-sourced equipment, but many face issues with age and quantity.
• Tanks: The main battle tank (MBT) is the PT-91M Pendekar, a modernized version of the T-72. The main issue is the small number of units (around 48), which limits strategic deployment and sustained operations.
• Armored Vehicles: The Army has a diverse fleet of armored vehicles, including the locally produced DefTech AV8 Gempita and the ACV-300 Adnan. While locally-made vehicles offer some logistical advantages, the diverse range of platforms from different countries can create complexities in maintenance and spare parts supply.
• Artillery: The Army operates the G5 Mk III 155mm howitzer and the Astros II MLRS. Some of these systems have been in service for a considerable time, raising concerns about their readiness and effectiveness against modern threats.
________________________________________
Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) ⚓
The RMN's fleet is grappling with significant issues related to aging ships, maintenance, and delayed procurement. A recent audit revealed that 34 of the RMN's 53 vessels have exceeded their intended service life, with 28 being over 40 years old.
• Fleet Aging: Many of the Navy's ships are past their prime. This has led to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational readiness rate.
• Procurement Delays: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, intended to provide six new frigates, has been plagued by major delays and cost overruns. None of the ships have been delivered, forcing the navy to continue operating its aging vessels.
• Logistical Problems: The lack of a consistent procurement strategy has resulted in a fleet with various classes of ships from different manufacturers. This has created logistical nightmares, with the RMN holding over RM380 million in unused spare parts, some of which are now obsolete and no longer compatible with the active fleet.
________________________________________
Royal MalondeshAir Force (RMAF) ✈️
The RMAF's assets face challenges related to maintenance, parts supply, and a shrinking fleet of combat aircraft.
• Aging Fleet and Modernization: The RMAF's fleet of combat aircraft, including the Sukhoi Su-30MKM and F/A-18D Hornet, is aging. While the RMAF is undergoing a Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) for the Sukhois, these jets will eventually need to be replaced.
• Supply Chain Issues: The RMAF's reliance on Russian-made aircraft like the Su-30MKM has created spare parts and maintenance challenges, particularly in light of international sanctions.
The Malondesh Armed Forces' assets are a mix of modern and aging equipment spread across three branches: the Army, Navy, and Air Force. A significant portion of these assets, totaling 171 units, is over 30 years old, creating a number of readiness and logistical challenges.
Hapus________________________________________
MalondeshArmy 🇲🇾
The MalondeshArmy's assets are a mix of domestic and foreign-sourced equipment, but many face issues with age and quantity.
• Tanks: The main battle tank (MBT) is the PT-91M Pendekar, a modernized version of the T-72. The main issue is the small number of units (around 48), which limits strategic deployment and sustained operations.
• Armored Vehicles: The Army has a diverse fleet of armored vehicles, including the locally produced DefTech AV8 Gempita and the ACV-300 Adnan. While locally-made vehicles offer some logistical advantages, the diverse range of platforms from different countries can create complexities in maintenance and spare parts supply.
• Artillery: The Army operates the G5 Mk III 155mm howitzer and the Astros II MLRS. Some of these systems have been in service for a considerable time, raising concerns about their readiness and effectiveness against modern threats.
________________________________________
Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) ⚓
The RMN's fleet is grappling with significant issues related to aging ships, maintenance, and delayed procurement. A recent audit revealed that 34 of the RMN's 53 vessels have exceeded their intended service life, with 28 being over 40 years old.
• Fleet Aging: Many of the Navy's ships are past their prime. This has led to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational readiness rate.
• Procurement Delays: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, intended to provide six new frigates, has been plagued by major delays and cost overruns. None of the ships have been delivered, forcing the navy to continue operating its aging vessels.
• Logistical Problems: The lack of a consistent procurement strategy has resulted in a fleet with various classes of ships from different manufacturers. This has created logistical nightmares, with the RMN holding over RM380 million in unused spare parts, some of which are now obsolete and no longer compatible with the active fleet.
________________________________________
Royal MalondeshAir Force (RMAF) ✈️
The RMAF's assets face challenges related to maintenance, parts supply, and a shrinking fleet of combat aircraft.
• Aging Fleet and Modernization: The RMAF's fleet of combat aircraft, including the Sukhoi Su-30MKM and F/A-18D Hornet, is aging. While the RMAF is undergoing a Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) for the Sukhois, these jets will eventually need to be replaced.
• Supply Chain Issues: The RMAF's reliance on Russian-made aircraft like the Su-30MKM has created spare parts and maintenance challenges, particularly in light of international sanctions.
THE WEAKNESSES OF THE MALONDESHMILITARY'S TANK FORCE ARE PRIMARILY CENTERED ON QUANTITY, AGE, AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES. THE ROYAL ARMOURED CORPS OPERATES A SMALL FLEET OF MAIN BATTLE TANKS (MBTS), WHICH LIMITS ITS CAPABILITIES IN COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL POWERS.
Hapus1. Limited Number of Tanks
Malondesh main battle tank fleet consists of a small number of PT-91M Pendekar tanks. The exact number varies in reports, but it is generally cited as around 48 units. This number is significantly lower than neighboring countries like Indonesia, which has a much larger tank fleet. This limited quantity can be a major disadvantage in a large-scale land conflict, as it restricts the ability to deploy tanks across different operational theaters and provides less strategic depth.
2. Obsolescence and Maintenance Issues
The PT-91M, while a capable tank, is a modernized variant of the T-72, a design that dates back to the Soviet era. While the Malondeshversion has been upgraded with a new engine, fire control system, and reactive armor, it still faces challenges related to its older design.
• Reliance on a Single Supplier: The PT-91M was purchased from Poland. This creates a dependency on a single foreign supplier for spare parts and maintenance, a problem that has been highlighted with the PT-91M. The Polish manufacturer has ceased production of some key components, which has led to a proposed Life Extension Program (LEP) to ensure the tanks remain operational. This program will rely on local expertise, which can be a slow and expensive process.
• Vulnerability to Modern Threats: The PT-91M, like many older tank designs, can be vulnerable to modern anti-tank weapons and drone attacks. While it is equipped with ERAWA-2 explosive reactive armor to protect against shaped-charge projectiles, it may be less effective against modern kinetic energy penetrators.
3. Logistical and Operational Constraints
Malondesh tank force also faces logistical challenges that can hinder its effectiveness.
• Mobility: While the PT-91M's weight (48.5 tonnes) makes it suitable for Malondesh often soft and uneven terrain, it may still face difficulties with older infrastructure, such as bridges with lower weight limits.
• Readiness: The small number of tanks and maintenance issues can impact the readiness of the fleet. Breakdowns have been reported in the past, underscoring the challenges of keeping a small fleet of specialized vehicles operational.
Ultimately, the main weakness of Malondesh tank force is not necessarily the quality of the PT-91M itself, but rather the small size of the fleet and the long-term logistical challenges of maintaining an aging and specialized inventory.
THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS FOR MALONDESH ARMED FORCES IS WIDELY CRITICIZED FOR BEING INEFFICIENT AND OPAQUE, LEADING TO A SERIES OF HIGH-PROFILE SCANDALS, SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL WASTE, AND SERIOUS GAPS IN MILITARY READINESS. THIS SYSTEMIC PROBLEM IS ROOTED IN A LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, POLITICAL INTERFERENCE, AND A RELIANCE ON INDIRECT ACQUISITION METHODS.
Hapus1. The "Middleman" System
A key issue is the heavy reliance on agents, middlemen, and politically connected individuals to facilitate defense contracts. This practice often bypasses open tender processes, which are designed to ensure transparency and competition.
• Inflated Costs: These middlemen typically charge hefty commissions, inflating the final price of military assets. This was a point of public concern by King Sultan Ibrahim, who stated that such practices lead to buying "nonsense" that is overpriced and ill-suited for the military's actual needs.
• Inadequate Equipment: Since the procurement is driven by commercial interests rather than by the end-user (the military), the equipment acquired may not be the most suitable or effective for its intended purpose.
________________________________________
2. High-Profile Scandals and Delays
The most infamous example of a failed procurement is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program.
• Massive Delays and Cost Overruns: The program, valued at RM9 billion, was meant to deliver six modern frigates to the Royal Malondesh Navy (RMN). Despite paying over RM6 billion, not a single ship has been delivered. The project is years behind schedule and has been plagued by allegations of mismanagement and corruption.
• Financial Misappropriation: Investigations have revealed that a significant portion of the allocated funds was used for other purposes, with some estimates pointing to hundreds of millions of ringgit in financial irregularities. .
• Impact on Readiness: The failure of the LCS program has left the RMN with a dangerously aging fleet. Many of its vessels are over 40 years old, leading to higher maintenance costs and lower operational readiness rates.
________________________________________
3. Lack of Transparency and Accountability
The defense procurement process is shrouded in secrecy, which makes it difficult to hold officials accountable for failures.
• Direct Negotiations: The majority of large defense contracts are awarded through direct negotiation rather than open bidding, which limits public and parliamentary oversight.
• Limited Audits: While audit reports exist, their recommendations are often not implemented. This was highlighted in a recent Auditor-General's report, which found serious delays, weak oversight, and millions of ringgit in uncollected penalties from contractors.
• Political Interference: Declassified reports on the LCS scandal revealed that key decisions, such as the choice of ship design, were made by political leaders against the recommendations of the navy, the end-user. This kind of political interference compromises the military's ability to make sound, strategic decisions.
________________________________________
4. Broader Systemic Failures
The problems in procurement are part of a larger systemic issue within Malondesh defense framework.
• No Cohesive Strategy: The absence of a clear, long-term defense policy has led to ad-hoc, fragmented procurement decisions. This has resulted in a mixed fleet of assets from various countries, creating a logistical nightmare for maintenance and supply chains.
• Inadequate Penalties: When projects are delayed or fail, penalties on contractors are often not enforced, and new contracts are sometimes awarded to the same companies, perpetuating a cycle of inefficiency and poor performance
1. FINANCIAL AND BUDGETARY REASONS
HapusOne of the most common reasons for cancellation is a lack of funds. The Malondeshn defense budget has historically been inconsistent and insufficient to support major, multi-year projects. When budgets are cut or not allocated as planned, the military is forced to scrap projects it can no longer afford.
• Impact on Acquisitions: This has led to the cancellation of proposed acquisitions, such as the plan to buy Kuwait's F/A-18C/D Hornet fighter jets. The decision was based on concerns about the high costs of upgrading and integrating the older jets, which were deemed to not provide sufficient "value for money."
• Inability to Pay: In some cases, the government or contractors may simply lack the funds to continue a project. This was a contributing factor to the failures of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, where a contractor struggled with financial solvency.
________________________________________
2. Poor Governance and Lack of Transparency
Many cancellations stem from fundamental issues in how contracts are awarded and managed.
• Direct Negotiation vs. Open Tenders: The use of direct negotiation instead of open tenders is a major weakness. It limits competition and can result in contracts being awarded to politically connected companies, even if they lack the expertise or financial capability to complete the project.
• Mismanagement and Corruption: Projects are often canceled due to evidence of financial mismanagement, overspending, or corruption. The LCS scandal is the most infamous example, where a parliamentary inquiry found evidence of funds being misused and payments made to unverified subcontractors.
________________________________________
3. Lack of Operational Feasibility
Sometimes, a project is canceled because the proposed asset is not suitable for the military's needs or poses a risk to personnel.
• Obsolete Technology: The recent cancellation of the deal to lease four Black Hawk helicopters is a clear example. Malondesh King Sultan Ibrahim ordered the deal to be scrapped, publicly criticizing the acquisition of old, over 30-year-old aircraft that he called "flying coffins." He noted that such acquisitions endanger the lives of pilots and do not provide the military with a necessary capability.
INADEQUATE DEFENSE SPENDING
HapusMalondesh defense budget as a percentage of its GDP is relatively low compared to the global average and some of its regional peers, such as Singapore. For a country with significant maritime interests and territorial disputes, this level of spending is widely considered insufficient to meet its defense needs.
• Regional Comparison: While Singapore consistently spends a higher percentage of its GDP on defense, Malondesh spending is often a point of concern for military experts and analysts. This disparity has led to a major capability gap between the Malondeshn Armed Forces and other more technologically advanced military forces in the region.
________________________________________
Impact on Modernization and Procurement
Limited funds directly impact the military's ability to acquire new and modern equipment.
• Piecemeal Acquisitions: Instead of being able to fund a comprehensive, long-term modernization plan, the military is often forced into making piecemeal acquisitions of a small number of new platforms. This results in a "mixed fleet" of different aircraft, ships, and vehicles, which makes maintenance, logistics, and training more complex and expensive.
• Cancelled and Delayed Projects: Major procurement projects, such as the acquisition of Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) and new patrol vessels, have been repeatedly delayed, scaled back, or canceled due to a lack of funds. The infamous Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal is a prime example of a multi-billion dollar project that failed to deliver any ships, leaving the navy with a critical capability gap.
________________________________________
Strain on Maintenance and Operations
A constrained budget also directly impacts the day-to-day operations and maintenance of existing equipment.
• High Maintenance Costs: The military's aging fleet requires more frequent and costly maintenance to remain operational. Funds that should be allocated for new acquisitions are instead used to keep old equipment running, creating a vicious cycle of reliance on outdated assets.
• Low Operational Readiness: Due to a lack of funds for maintenance and spare parts, many military platforms, from naval ships to air force aircraft, have low readiness rates. This means a significant number of assets are not available for deployment, which severely compromises the military's ability to conduct regular training exercises and respond to threats effectively.
THE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SIGNIFICANT LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES DUE TO A RELIANCE ON A DIVERSE RANGE OF PLATFORMS FROM DIFFERENT INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIERS, AGING EQUIPMENT, AND A LACK OF A COHESIVE, MODERN LOGISTICS SYSTEM. THIS CREATES PROBLEMS IN MAINTENANCE, READINESS, AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS.
BalasHapus1. Fragmentation of Supply Chains
Malondeshhas historically procured military equipment from various countries, including the United States, Russia, Poland, the United Kingdom, and China. This practice has created a complex and inefficient supply chain.
• Diverse Parts and Maintenance Needs: Each type of equipment, from the Polish-made PT-91M tanks to the Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets, requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Reliance on Foreign Suppliers: The military is highly dependent on foreign manufacturers for critical components. For example, sanctions on Russia have made it difficult to secure spare parts for the Su-30MKM fleet, leading to a low operational readiness rate.
• Obsolete Parts: A diverse and aging inventory means that many spare parts become obsolete. The Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) reportedly has millions of ringgit in unused, obsolete spare parts because of a mismatched fleet and inconsistent procurement.
2. Aging Fleet and High Maintenance Costs
A significant portion of Malondesh military assets is over 30 years old, which directly impacts operational readiness.
• Increased Maintenance Burden: Older vehicles, ships, and aircraft require more frequent and expensive maintenance. A 2021 study revealed that 34 of the RMN's 53 vessels had exceeded their intended service life, with 28 being over 40 years old. This leads to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational tempo.
• Inadequate Readiness: An aging fleet often fails to meet readiness targets. For instance, the MalondeshArmy's Type-B vehicles, which include non-armored transport vehicles, have historically failed to meet their mandated 80% serviceability rate, limiting their ability to support operations.
3. Delays and Mismanagement in Procurement
Long-standing procurement issues have worsened the logistical problems.
• Project Delays: The most prominent example is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program. The project has been plagued by delays and cost overruns, with no ships delivered despite significant payments. This has forced the RMN to rely on its aging fleet, which further strains its maintenance budget.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Investigations into major procurement projects, such as the LCS program, have revealed issues with mismanagement and alleged corruption. The use of "middlemen" has been criticized for inflating prices, while poor contract management has resulted in projects failing to meet deadlines or deliver on their promised capabilities.
4. Limited Local and Automated Support
While Malondeshis trying to develop its defense industry, a lack of local expertise and modern systems exacerbates logistical issues.
• Limited Local Production: Despite efforts to boost domestic defense industries, Malondeshstill heavily relies on foreign suppliers. This limits the ability to produce spare parts locally, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
• Outdated Inventory Management: Some military units still use manual, traditional methods for inventory and maintenance records. This prevents real-time tracking of assets and spare parts, leading to inefficiencies in maintenance planning and supply chain management.
THE REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY ASSETS IN MALONDESHHAS BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY STALLED, PARTICULARLY FOR THE ROYAL MALONDESHAIR FORCE (RMAF), DUE TO A COMBINATION OF FACTORS INCLUDING A RELIANCE ON A SINGLE FOREIGN SUPPLIER, COMPLEX LOGISTICAL ISSUES, AND DELAYS IN PROPOSED ACQUISITION DEALS.
BalasHapusStalled Fighter Jet Replacements
The RMAF's fighter fleet, including the Sukhoi Su-30MKM and the F/A-18D Hornet, is aging, with many jets having been in service for decades. The replacement programs have been beset by a number of issues:
• Reliance on a Single Foreign Supplier: The RMAF's fleet of Su-30MKM jets, acquired from Russia, has faced persistent challenges with spare parts and maintenance, leading to a low operational readiness rate. International sanctions on Russia have exacerbated these issues, making it difficult for Malondeshto secure the necessary components to keep its fleet fully operational.
• Failed Acquisition of Used Hornets: Malondeshhad planned to acquire a number of used F/A-18C/D Hornet jets from Kuwait as a stop-gap measure. However, this deal has been subject to long delays because Kuwait itself is waiting for the delivery of its new F/A-18E/F Super Hornets from the United States. This uncertainty has prompted Malondeshto reconsider the deal and explore other options.
• Long-Term Modernization Delays: Malondesh long-term plan to replace its fighter fleet by 2040 with a fifth-generation stealth platform, such as the F-35 or Rafale, is a distant goal. The current delays in stop-gap measures and the high cost of new jets have left the RMAF with a significant capability gap in the interim.
________________________________________
Other Delays
The problems are not limited to the Air Force. The Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) and the MalondeshArmy also face significant delays in their modernization programs.
• Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program: This program, meant to deliver six modern frigates to the RMN, has been crippled by severe delays and cost overruns. None of the ships have been delivered, forcing the Navy to rely on an aging fleet, with many vessels now over 40 years old.
• Logistical Challenges: The stalled acquisitions and a lack of a single, coherent modernization strategy have created a logistical nightmare. The RMN, for example, has accumulated hundreds of millions of ringgit in unused and obsolete spare parts because of its mixed fleet from various international suppliers.
INADEQUATE DEFENSE SPENDING
BalasHapusMalondesh defense budget as a percentage of its GDP is relatively low compared to the global average and some of its regional peers, such as Singapore. For a country with significant maritime interests and territorial disputes, this level of spending is widely considered insufficient to meet its defense needs.
• Regional Comparison: While Singapore consistently spends a higher percentage of its GDP on defense, Malondesh spending is often a point of concern for military experts and analysts. This disparity has led to a major capability gap between the Malondeshn Armed Forces and other more technologically advanced military forces in the region.
________________________________________
Impact on Modernization and Procurement
Limited funds directly impact the military's ability to acquire new and modern equipment.
• Piecemeal Acquisitions: Instead of being able to fund a comprehensive, long-term modernization plan, the military is often forced into making piecemeal acquisitions of a small number of new platforms. This results in a "mixed fleet" of different aircraft, ships, and vehicles, which makes maintenance, logistics, and training more complex and expensive.
• Cancelled and Delayed Projects: Major procurement projects, such as the acquisition of Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) and new patrol vessels, have been repeatedly delayed, scaled back, or canceled due to a lack of funds. The infamous Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal is a prime example of a multi-billion dollar project that failed to deliver any ships, leaving the navy with a critical capability gap.
________________________________________
Strain on Maintenance and Operations
A constrained budget also directly impacts the day-to-day operations and maintenance of existing equipment.
• High Maintenance Costs: The military's aging fleet requires more frequent and costly maintenance to remain operational. Funds that should be allocated for new acquisitions are instead used to keep old equipment running, creating a vicious cycle of reliance on outdated assets.
• Low Operational Readiness: Due to a lack of funds for maintenance and spare parts, many military platforms, from naval ships to air force aircraft, have low readiness rates. This means a significant number of assets are not available for deployment, which severely compromises the military's ability to conduct regular training exercises and respond to threats effectively.
INADEQUATE DEFENSE SPENDING
BalasHapusMalondesh defense budget as a percentage of its GDP is relatively low compared to the global average and some of its regional peers, such as Singapore. For a country with significant maritime interests and territorial disputes, this level of spending is widely considered insufficient to meet its defense needs.
• Regional Comparison: While Singapore consistently spends a higher percentage of its GDP on defense, Malondesh spending is often a point of concern for military experts and analysts. This disparity has led to a major capability gap between the Malondeshn Armed Forces and other more technologically advanced military forces in the region.
________________________________________
Impact on Modernization and Procurement
Limited funds directly impact the military's ability to acquire new and modern equipment.
• Piecemeal Acquisitions: Instead of being able to fund a comprehensive, long-term modernization plan, the military is often forced into making piecemeal acquisitions of a small number of new platforms. This results in a "mixed fleet" of different aircraft, ships, and vehicles, which makes maintenance, logistics, and training more complex and expensive.
• Cancelled and Delayed Projects: Major procurement projects, such as the acquisition of Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) and new patrol vessels, have been repeatedly delayed, scaled back, or canceled due to a lack of funds. The infamous Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal is a prime example of a multi-billion dollar project that failed to deliver any ships, leaving the navy with a critical capability gap.
________________________________________
Strain on Maintenance and Operations
A constrained budget also directly impacts the day-to-day operations and maintenance of existing equipment.
• High Maintenance Costs: The military's aging fleet requires more frequent and costly maintenance to remain operational. Funds that should be allocated for new acquisitions are instead used to keep old equipment running, creating a vicious cycle of reliance on outdated assets.
• Low Operational Readiness: Due to a lack of funds for maintenance and spare parts, many military platforms, from naval ships to air force aircraft, have low readiness rates. This means a significant number of assets are not available for deployment, which severely compromises the military's ability to conduct regular training exercises and respond to threats effectively.
1. AGING AND OBSOLETE FLEET
BalasHapusA large portion of the RMAF's aircraft is old, with some models in service for several decades. This has created a fleet with a high average age, leading to a number of critical problems:
• High Maintenance Costs: Keeping an aging fleet airworthy is expensive. Older aircraft require more frequent and specialized maintenance, consuming a large part of the RMAF's operating budget that could otherwise be used for modernization.
• Low Operational Readiness: Due to frequent technical issues and the unavailability of spare parts, many aircraft have low readiness rates and spend significant time on the ground. This severely limits the RMAF's capacity to conduct regular training and respond to threats effectively.
• Corrosion Issues: Operating in Malondesh's hot and humid tropical environment, with coastal bases, accelerates corrosion in the aluminum structures of older aircraft. This can lead to metal fatigue and structural failures, raising serious safety concerns for pilots and crew.
• Technological Obsolescence: Many older aircraft lack the modern avionics, weapon systems, and networking capabilities needed for contemporary air combat. This puts the RMAF at a disadvantage against more technologically advanced air forces in the region.
________________________________________
2. Budgetary Constraints and Slow Modernization
The RMAF's modernization efforts have been consistently hampered by a limited and inconsistent defense budget.
• Insufficient Funding: The budget allocated for military development is often insufficient to fund major, large-scale acquisitions. This forces the RMAF to adopt a piecemeal approach to modernization, acquiring a small number of new platforms at a time.
• Delayed Plans: Key acquisition programs, such as the procurement of new Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) and Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA), have been repeatedly delayed or scaled back due to a lack of funds.
________________________________________
3. Inefficient Procurement Process
The process of acquiring new military assets is a major weakness, often criticized for being slow, opaque, and inefficient.
• Lack of Transparency: Procurement is frequently conducted through direct negotiation rather than open tenders, which can lead to inflated prices and a lack of accountability.
• Role of Intermediaries: The involvement of middlemen or agents in defense deals can drive up costs significantly, wasting public funds and sometimes resulting in the acquisition of unsuitable equipment.
• Project Delays: These issues have led to numerous project failures and delays, leaving the RMAF's fleet in a state of limbo and undermining its long-term strategic plans.
AGING FLEET AND HIGH MAINTENANCE COSTS
BalasHapusA major weakness is that a large portion of the RMN's fleet is obsolete. According to an audit report, about half of its 49 ships are operating beyond their serviceable lifespan, with some vessels in service for over 40 years. This reliance on old ships leads to several problems:
• High Maintenance Costs: Older ships require more frequent and extensive maintenance, consuming a disproportionate share of the RMN's limited budget. This creates a cycle where money needed for new acquisitions is instead diverted to keep old vessels running.
• Low Operational Readiness: The frequent breakdowns and lengthy maintenance periods mean that many ships are not available for deployment. This severely limits the RMN's capacity to patrol its vast maritime domain and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
________________________________________
Procurement Failures and Scandals
The RMN's efforts to modernize its fleet have been plagued by systemic failures in the procurement process. The most prominent example is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal.
• Project Failure: The government awarded a RM9 billion contract for six new stealth frigates. However, despite paying a significant portion of the contract, not a single ship has been delivered.
• Financial Mismanagement: The project was mired in financial mismanagement and a lack of transparency. A parliamentary committee found that funds were misappropriated, and payments were made for work that was never completed.
This scandal, along with other procurement irregularities, has created a major capability gap, leaving the RMN without the modern assets it desperately needs to replace its aging fleet.
________________________________________
Mismatch Between Capabilities and Threats
Given its aging fleet and limited resources, the RMN faces a significant mismatch between its naval capabilities and the maritime security challenges it faces. These challenges include:
• Territorial Disputes: The RMN must assert Malondesh's claims in the South China Sea against larger and more technologically advanced navies.
• Non-Traditional Threats: It is also responsible for combating illegal fishing, smuggling, and piracy in its waters.
The inability to effectively patrol and defend its maritime interests leaves Malondesh vulnerable and undermines its strategic position in the region