25 Mei 2017

Ukraine Offers Radars, UAVs and Air Defense to Phillipines

25 Mei 2017


Ukrainian made UAV (photo : iec expo)

"SpetsTeсhnoExport" starts cooperation in defense industry with Philippines

Pavlo Barbul, Director of SFTE “SpetsTechnoExport” and Oleg Hladkovskiy,  First Deputy to the Secretary of the NSDC of Ukraine, during the working visit to the Republic of the Philippines, held an official meeting with the Secretary of National Defense Delfin N.Lorenzana and a number of negotiations with the senior leadership of defense offices of the country. The parties discussed the potential of cooperation between the countries, particularly in the field of shipbuilding, production of air defense means, UAV's, radar equipment and weapon systems.

"In fact, the Philippines with its market and economy are opening up huge prospects for Ukrainian developers and manufacturers. Shipbuilding, various weapon systems, radars, UAVs - this is nowhere near a full list of what Ukraine can offer as part of a mutually beneficial defense cooperation", - said the First Deputy to the Secretary of the NSDC of Ukraine.

This visit has to be a new starting point for the development of efficient cooperation and contribute to strengthening of national security of both states. 

(SpetsTechnoExport)

28 komentar:

  1. Musrik!!!! Min tlng hapus comment sesat ini..

    BalasHapus
  2. Ya setidaknya ibu dita ga rusuh kang.

    BalasHapus
  3. All indonesian...

    Gimana ceritanya kejadian clash antara indonesia & vietnam di natuna?? kok sunyi sekali...apa benar masih di natuna @ sudah masuk teritorial vietnam...sumber luar ada menyebut vietnam siap kalau indonesia menyerang..

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. Na klo makhluk nyang in beda cerita :D

      Hapus
    2. Lah lo mah ngaco siapa yg mau perang ma vietnam ?
      Kalo perang ma china gw seneng , siap membela nkri sampai titik darah karena china terkenal rakus , titisan yajuj & majuj

      Hapus
    3. Kalau indonesia perang dengan vietnam kawasan asia bakal terbakar habis . Secara militer kekuatan vietnam masih di bawah indonesia .

      Hapus
    4. ane kan lagi tanya ceritanya gimana..bukan solutionnya..

      Hapus
    5. http://mukhtar-api.blogspot.co.id/2017/05/insiden-penahanan-awak-kapal-pengawas.html?m=1

      Hapus
    6. Solusi y dengan cara penyelesaian diplomatik kedua belah pihak sudah sepakat RI _VIETKONG yg benturan di natuna di selesaikan lewat jalur kekeluargaan

      Hapus
    7. Muarif

      Indonesia berada di atas vietnam dari segi kekuatan tentera?? Thats new. U know what else is new, the Vietnam War. America must be a hell of a lot weaker the Indonesia to loose to vietnam.

      Hapus
    8. Bro Shed, I think your comparation is not fair.
      Di perang vietnam, tentera US tidak mengenal medan dengan baik, that is a key point. Selain itu, US tidak mengira militansi warga Vietnam. Itu pernah disampaikan dalam salah satu jurnal tentang perang vietnam (but sorry, I'm forget name of that journal).
      Seandainya, perang RI vs Viet di Vietnam, RI akan lemah. But, common Bro, RI never ever start that war..!! And incident between RI & Viet in Indo EEZ, near Natuna. Not in Viet area...
      If Bro Muarif opinions from Global Fire Power Index, thats correct opinion. Depend of us, believe or not with GFP Index...

      Hapus
    9. Selama doktrin latihan kita masih #maribungrebutkembali ga usah lah ad opini kita perang2an.

      Hapus
    10. Indonesia n vietnam is friend..if any trouble...cingcai2 masalah selesai...itu menandakan hubungan yang baik antar 2 negara...

      Hapus
    11. wah..banyak baik ar indonesia sama vietnam..kalau sama malaysia..pasti mau di ganyang..

      malaysia yg banyak bantu vietnam pun tak se rapat itu hubungannya..

      Hapus
    12. Bro Tupez

      U cant "cingcai2" when it came to sovereignity bro. Kalau kita boleh cingcai2 takkan wujud konflik d Sprately, Limbang or in that case Ambalat. What we have is the status quo. But i do believe that the matter can and should be settled politicaly and in an orderly manner.

      Bro panji

      It was a figure of speech. The American had a policy of limited warefare during the Vietnam War. They cant strike directly at the weapons supplier to the North Vietnamese (China & the USSR) or it would be WW3.

      No. Vietnam or in this case Indonesia wouldnt be that stupid to start a war in the SCS. Vietnam is more concern about China. Even if there is a war between ur two countries asia tidak akan "terbakar habis" seperti yg dkatakan oleh bro Muarif. Thats taking it to far even for the likes of Muarif.

      Hapus
    13. Yup Bro shed, what I say your comparison is not fair, cause in your word to muarif "Amerika must be a hell of lot weaker the Indonesia to loose to Vietnam".
      In my opinion, your word means " its a joke if RI stronger than Viet, cause US loose in Viet War by vietnam (correct me if I'm wrong)".
      Its unfair comparisson because different condition. US loose in viet war doesn't meaning US weaker than Indo if Muarif's comparison is true (actually I'm not agree with Muarif conclussion).
      So I wrote before, US loose because the other factor not millitary power weaker than vietcong.

      I think, the biggest war that US involve is in Viet. Thats true US didn't directly attack China and USSR. But US directly attack Vietcong (include China's army) so 58.315 die and 1.100 China's army die (wikipedia).
      I'm agree for all reason, Vietcong is winner in that war. And I'm agree too, for all reason US loose in that war. Could not attack Vietcong weapon supplier is not reason US loose. Vietcong's geurillia tactics succes killed the enemy. That tactics succes if know how battle field better.

      I'm agree Muarif's words "asia bakal terbakar habis is too much. Maybe, he use hiperbolic phrase..

      Hapus
    14. Bro panji

      The American were fighting:

      a) North Vietnamese Armed Forces
      b) The Vietcong
      c) The PLA (secara tidak rasmi)
      e) The Pathet Lao
      f) The Khmer Rouge

      The North Vietnamese Regulars and the Vietcong is different bro. They are not the same. True the PLA was involved but not as front line units. Most of the casualties suffered by the PLA was military advisers.

      The Global firepower index rated Japan below the Uk. U believe that? For what? Nuclear weapons? Greece and Thailand is also well below Indonesia. $##=%&*** man.

      Hapus
  4. Bro AP, diplomatic way for best solution..
    Nobody will attack other.
    But sorry, thats out of topic. Better back to the topic..

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. ah..gak papa klu out of topic..lagikan topicnya bosen..topic ane lagi bagus..

      Hapus
    2. Korang ikutan out topic " TNI AD Melesat di Lomba Menembak AASAM 2017 "

      https://jakartagreater.com/tni-ad-melesat-di-lomba-menembak-aasam-2017/

      sini panoraka masuk cuba comen di jakartagreater biar keliatan nampak komen malon bodoh2..

      Hapus
    3. ah lu memang suka cari ribut lah..ane lagi mau insaf,ada aja setan2 yg datang goda2 ane..

      JKGR ?? gak mau ah..asyik kena banned aja..forumer indonesia disini lebih mantap daya tahannya..Klu JKGR udah mancing2,tapi marahnya meledak duluan..

      Hapus
    4. JKGR blog hoax blog tempat orang mimpi,...jadi jangan bawa2 kesini deh..

      Hapus
    5. Jakarta Greater? Rasanya aku pernah memberikan komen di sana. Tp komen aku telah dpadam. Why is that??

      Hapus
  5. Pinoy needs more tanks and lots of heavy artillery to crush isis in mindanao. Be strong pinoy.

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. They dont need tanks for that. What they need is more CAS assets.Im a muslim but i dont support ISIS @ Daesh. They gave Islam a bad name.

      Hapus
    2. heavy MBTs are not applicable in our roads and bridges but armored transport vehicles and fire support vehicles such as M-113 or BTR-80 is much more needed by our ground forces. Shed anuar is right we need more CAS and attack helicopters

      Hapus
  6. Air defense produksi ukraina apaan ya ?? Ada yang tahu

    BalasHapus