04 April 2026

Exercise Kakadu Makes History in the Harbour

04 April 2026

Exercise Kakadu Fleet Review (KFR) 2026 (photos: Aus DoD)

Vessels from 19 nations sailed into Sydney Harbour on March 21 for the Exercise Kakadu Fleet Review (KFR), commemorating 125 years since the foundation of Australia’s Navy.

Governor-General Sam Mostyn reviewed the vessels from on board Navy’s survey vessel, HMAS Leeuwin.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, Chief of Navy Vice Admiral Mark Hammond and a constellation of admirals, including participating nations’ chiefs of navy, accompanied Ms Mostyn.

KRI Martadinata 331 from Indonesia (photo: Aus DoD)

The review was part of the wider Exercise Kakadu, the Royal Australian Navy’s premier multinational maritime engagement exercise, conducted biennially to strengthen maritime security cooperation, enhance interoperability and build partnerships across the Indo-Pacific.

Mr Marles highlighted the historic scale of the KFR.

“Last week marked the largest naval review in Sydney Harbour in more than a decade, with 18 partner nations joining Australia and an unprecedented range of vessels on display,” Mr Marles said.

Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Mogami Class Frigate JS Kumano (photo: Aus DoD)

“Partners from across the Indo Pacific were represented, including the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Japan and India, along with South-East Asian nations such as Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand.

“For the first time, Exercise Kakadu included a Vietnamese ship, alongside the largest gathering of Guardian-class patrol vessels and a Japanese Mogami class vessel.”

Over the course of the day, 31 naval vessels entered Sydney Harbour for the review.

USS Fitzgerald 62 of the US Navy (photo: Aus DoD)

"This is an ideal place to commemorate all of that service, all of the servicemen and women who have stood the watch before us, and to pay a nod to those who will serve in the future fleet.”

Navy’s flagship HMAS Canberra led the main division at dawn and passed the hallowed mast of HMAS Sydney I at Bradley’s Head as personnel hoisted the Australian white ensign in a poignant ceremonial colours ceremony.

Vice Admiral Hammond spoke about the significance of the KFR and of celebrating in Sydney.

BRP Diego Silang 07 of the Philippines Navy (photo: Aus DoD)

“This is the first time we’ve brought Kakadu participants here to Sydney Harbour,” Vice Admiral Hammond said.

“And the entry this morning was pretty spectacular.”

The final division of ships entered the Harbour mid-afternoon, led by HMAS Stuart, passing and saluting Leeuwin as multiple Navy and Air Force aerial displays flew overhead.

KD Lekir 26 of the Royal Malaysian Navy (photo: Aus DoD)

Then Leeuwin, ferrying the Governor-General and her constellation of admirals, reviewed the gathered ships, taking a salute and a cheer ship from each.

Vice Admiral Hammond also spoke to the 125th anniversary.

“One hundred and 25 years of naval service commenced in March of 1901 with the establishment of the Commonwealth Naval Force,” Vice Admiral Hammond said.

Royal Thai Navy ship HTMS Naresuan 421 (photo: Aus DoD)

“In 1911, we were conferred with the title Royal Australian Navy from His Majesty the King, and then in 1913 we witnessed the arrival of the first fleet unit here in Sydney Harbour.

“So, this is an ideal place to commemorate all of that service, all of the servicemen and women who have stood the watch before us, and to pay a nod to those who will serve in the future fleet.”

Following the KFR, vessels remained alongside Garden Island Defence Precinct for several days.

RSS Intrepid 69 of the Republic of Singapore Navy (photo: Aus DoD)

Ship’s companies explored Sydney and surrounds and engaged in a multi-national sports day before the main Kakadu exercise commenced off the east coast of Australia.

“What the participants are particularly looking forward to is the opportunity to exercise everything from disaster relief and constabulary operations, right up to the higher end of warfighting skills that we need to practise with our allies and partners,” Vice Admiral Hammond said.

VPN Quang Trung 016 of the Vietnamese People's Navy (photo: Aus DoD)

“The Fleet Review highlights the depth of our partnerships across the region, demonstrating the strength of the relationships and the importance of working together to ensure a secure maritime domain.

“For 125 years, Australia’s Navy has defended our nation, protected our maritime approaches, and supported regional stability, but we have never done it alone. Our partners and allies have played a critical role in our 125-year history.”


148 komentar:

  1. MALONDESH BOTOL KISMIN KASTA DALIT SUBSIDI ASETNYA PALING OLD DAN OMPONG 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    BalasHapus
  2. DAMEN PKR REM kapal kita baruw moderen

    lah seblah ituw bawa kapal ww 2 haha!🤣🤣🤣

    BalasHapus
  3. haloo mogami nich haha!🤗✌️🤗

    para warganyet kl baca berita ini
    makin NGAMUK🔥 mreka haha!😤🤣😤
    ✅️ke jepang putih mogami
    ✅️ke kpop ifx

    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    Japan woos Indonesia with stealth frigates ahead of Prabowo-Takaichi talks
    https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3347360/japan-woos-indonesia-stealth-frigates-ahead-prabowo-takaichi-talks

    BalasHapus
  4. Manakala INDIANESIA... 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣


    Rupiah Rp17.000 Buat IHSG Turun 2,19% Terlemah di Bursa Asia

    https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/104867/rupiah-rp17-000-buat-ihsg-turun-2-19-terlemah-di-bursa-asia

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. Kau pur pengecut kalah debat lari tajuk kurs, defisit, Israel...focus lah kapan itu Lekiu yg sudah usang World War 2 diganti...gak malu ke...pakai kapal USANG ikut Latihan militer... Kelihatan MISKIN SANGAT....PADAHAL RINGGIT BERJAYE ...

      Hapus
    2. MALAYDESH HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
      -
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    3. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    4. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM LCS CASH = LOAN
      💰 1. LIMITED DOMESTIC DEFENSE BUDGET
      • Malaydesh’s defense budget is modest — around 1% of GDP, which restricts large-scale acquisitions.
      • Instead of upfront payments, Malaydesh often negotiates deferred payment schemes, installment plans, or loans backed by export credit agencies (ECAs) from supplier countries.
      • These financing models allow Malaydesh to acquire high-value assets without immediate fiscal strain.
      -----------------
      ⚙️ 2. Need for Advanced Technology and Capabilities
      Malaydesh lacks the domestic capacity to produce high-end military platforms, so it turns to foreign suppliers:
      Country Asset Procured Financing/Support Mechanism
      🇰🇷 South Korea FA-50 Light Combat Aircraft Industrial offsets, local assembly, favorable terms
      🇮🇹 Italy ATR-72 Maritime Patrol Aircraft G2G deal, possible ECA-backed financing
      🇹🇷 Turkey ANKA MALE Drones Strategic partnership, tech transfer
      These deals often include training, maintenance, and technology sharing, which Malaydesh cannot yet provide internally.
      -----------------
      🏭 3. Desire to Build Local Defense Industry
      Malaydesh wants to reduce dependency and stimulate its own defense ecosystem:
      • Offsets: Foreign suppliers agree to invest in Malaydesh’s defense industry or transfer technology.
      • Joint Ventures: Local firms like Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) are involved in assembly and integration.
      • Local Assembly: 14 of the FA-50 jets will be assembled in Malaydesh, building technical capacity.
      💸 Role of Loans in Defense Procurement
      While not always disclosed as “loans,” Malaydesh’s defense deals often involve:
      • Export Credit Agency (ECA) Financing: Countries like Italy and South Korea use ECAs to offer low-interest loans or guarantees to support defense exports.
      • G2G Agreements: These bypass middlemen and commissions, reducing corruption risks and allowing for more favorable financing terms3.
      • Strategic Installment Plans
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
      • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
      Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
      • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang

      Hapus
    6. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Scorpene Submarines (France, early 2000s):
      a. Procurement: Malaydesh acquired two Scorpene-class submarines from France.
      b. Financing Mechanism: The financing was primarily through loans from French banks.
      c. Role of Export Credit Agency: These loans were backed by the French government’s export credit agency (likely Coface). Coface guaranteed a significant portion of the loans, mitigating the risk for the French commercial banks. This made the banks more willing to lend to Malaydesh for such a large defense acquisition.
      d. Payment Structure: The contract involved payments stretched over many years, allowing Malaydesh to integrate the cost into its long-term defense budget rather than paying a huge lump sum upfront.
      e. Significance: This is a classic example of how ECAs facilitate large, complex defense sales by providing financial assurances.
      ----------------------
      2. PT-91M “Pendekar” Tanks (Poland):
      a. Procurement: Malaydesh acquired a number of PT-91M main battle tanks from Poland.
      b. Financing Mechanism: Reports indicate export credit financing from Poland/Europe. This means Polish banks, potentially supported by Polish or European ECAs, provided loans to Malaydesh.
      c. Reason for Financing: The "total contract was too large for Malaydesh’s defense budget in one year." This highlights the core purpose of loan financing: enabling significant purchases that would otherwise strain annual budgetary allocations.
      d. Significance: Demonstrates how financing helps overcome immediate budget constraints for substantial military hardware.
      ----------------------
      3. Littoral Combat Ship (LCS):
      a. Procurement: A program to build six Littoral Combat Ships locally in Malaydesh by Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS).
      b. Financing Mechanism: This was a mix of domestic and foreign financing.
       Domestic: Malaydeshn banks supported Boustead Naval Shipyard with loans. This is common in local defense industries, where domestic financial institutions provide working capital or project finance to the prime contractor.
       Government Payments: The Malaydeshn government made progressive payments to BNS as construction milestones were met. This is a common payment method for large projects, but often doesn't cover the full upfront cost, necessitating additional loans for the shipyard.
      c. Challenges: The mention of "Debt restructuring later became necessary due to delays" is crucial. Delays in project execution can lead to cost overruns, increased interest payments on loans, and a mismatch between payment schedules and project progress, often requiring renegotiation of financial terms.
      d. Significance: Shows how even domestically-built projects can rely on a complex web of financing, and the risks associated with project delays on financial stability.

      Hapus
    7. 2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG FOR SUBSIDI BBM
      Malaydesh bisa membiayai subsidi dengan hutang negara:
      1. Anggaran Pemerintah dan Defisit:
      • Anggaran Tahunan: SeTIAP TAHUN TIPU-TIPU, pemerintah Malaydesh menyusun anggaran yang menguraikan perkiraan pendapatan dan pengeluaran. Subsidi adalah salah satu komponen pengeluaran yang signifikan, meliputi subsidi bahan bakar, listrik, makanan, dan lain-lain.
      • 🦧GORILA IQ BOTOL = DEFISIT ANGGARAN: Jika total pengeluaran melebihi total pendapatan yang diperkirakan, pemerintah mengalami 🦧GORILA IQ BOTOL = DEFISIT ANGGARAN. Untuk menutupi defisit ini, pemerintah harus mencari sumber pendanaan tambahan.
      2. Mekanisme Pembiayaan Defisit (dan Subsidi):
      Ketika pemerintah memutuskan untuk memberikan subsidi tetapi tidak memiliki cukup uang tunai dari pendapatan saat ini, mereka akan meminjam. Berikut adalah cara-cara utama:
      • Penerbitan Obligasi Pemerintah:
      o Apa itu Obligasi? Obligasi adalah surat hutang yang diterbitkan oleh pemerintah untuk meminjam uang dari investor (individu, institusi keuangan, bank, dll.). Investor membeli obligasi ini dengan janji akan menerima pembayaran bunga secara berkala dan pengembalian pokok pada saat jatuh tempo.
      o Bagaimana Terkait Subsidi? Dana yang terkumpul dari penjualan obligasi ini kemudian dapat digunakan untuk mendanai berbagai program pemerintah, termasuk pembayaran subsidi. Ini secara efektif berarti pemerintah meminjam uang untuk membayar subsidi, dan pinjaman ini menjadi bagian dari hutang negara.
      o Contoh di Malaydesh: Malaydesh secara rutin menerbitkan obligasi pemerintah seperti Malaydeshn Government Securities (MGS) dan Malaydeshn Government Investment Issues (MGII) untuk membiayai pengeluaran dan proyek pembangunan.
      • Pinjaman dari Lembaga Keuangan:
      o Pemerintah juga dapat meminjam langsung dari bank domestik atau lembaga keuangan internasional (misalnya, Bank Dunia, Asian Development Bank), meskipun ini kurang umum untuk pembiayaan subsidi rutin dan lebih sering untuk proyek-proyek besar atau saat krisis.
      3. Dampak terhadap Hutang Negara:
      • Peningkatan Hutang: Setiap kali pemerintah meminjam uang untuk membiayai subsidi (atau pengeluaran lain), jumlah total hutang negara akan meningkat.
      • Beban Bunga: Peningkatan hutang berarti pemerintah juga harus membayar bunga atas pinjaman tersebut. Pembayaran bunga ini menjadi pengeluaran tahunan dalam anggaran pemerintah, yang berarti sebagian dari pendapatan negara harus dialokasikan untuk membayar bunga hutang daripada untuk program lain.
      • Risiko Fiskal: Jika rasio hutang terhadap PDB menjadi terlalu tinggi atau jika beban bunga menjadi tidak berkelanjutan, ini dapat menimbulkan risiko fiskal bagi negara, seperti:
      o Penurunan Peringkat Kredit: Lembaga pemeringkat kredit dapat menurunkan peringkat kredit negara, yang membuat biaya pinjaman di masa depan menjadi lebih mahal.
      o Tekanan Inflasi: Jika pemerintah mencetak uang untuk membayar hutang (meskipun jarang terjadi di Malaydesh), ini bisa menyebabkan inflasi.

      Hapus
    8. 2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      • UTANG PEMERINTAH FEDERAL PER KAPITA: RM 36,139
      • UTANG RUMAH TANGGA PER KAPITA: RM 45,859
      Angka-angka ini cukup signifikan dan menunjukkan tingkat ketergantungan yang tinggi pada utang baik di tingkat pemerintah maupun rumah tangga.
      Implikasi Detail terhadap Perekonomian Riil:
      Implikasi Gabungan (Utang Pemerintah + Utang Rumah Tangga):
      1. Risiko Krisis Keuangan yang Lebih Tinggi:
      o Penjelasan: Kombinasi utang pemerintah dan rumah tangga yang tinggi menciptakan dua front kerentanan. Jika salah satu sektor goyah, ia bisa menarik sektor lainnya ke dalam masalah.
      o Dampak Riil: Jika terjadi perlambatan ekonomi, baik pemerintah maupun rumah tangga akan kesulitan membayar utang, menciptakan efek domino yang parah dan potensi krisis keuangan yang dalam.
      2. Ruang Gerak Kebijakan yang Terbatas:
      o Penjelasan: Baik pemerintah maupun bank sentral memiliki ruang gerak yang terbatas untuk merespons krisis ekonomi.
      o Dampak Riil:
       Stimulus Fiskal Sulit: Pemerintah mungkin kesulitan meluncurkan paket stimulus fiskal (misalnya, melalui pengeluaran infrastruktur atau bantuan sosial) jika utangnya sudah sangat tinggi.
       Batas Bawah Suku Bunga: Bank sentral mungkin sudah menurunkan suku bunga ke tingkat yang sangat rendah untuk mendukung ekonomi, sehingga tidak banyak lagi "amunisi" tersisa jika terjadi krisis lebih lanjut.
      3. Ketidakpastian Ekonomi dan Investor:
      o Penjelasan: Tingkat utang yang tinggi secara keseluruhan menciptakan ketidakpastian bagi investor domestik maupun asing.
      o Dampak Riil: Investor cenderung menghindari negara dengan tingkat utang yang meragukan, mengurangi investasi dan berpotensi memicu pelarian modal (capital flight), yang akan melemahkan mata uang dan memperburuk kondisi ekonomi.

      Hapus

    9. 2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      • UTANG PEMERINTAH FEDERAL PER KAPITA: RM 36,139
      • UTANG RUMAH TANGGA PER KAPITA: RM 45,859
      Angka-angka ini cukup signifikan dan menunjukkan tingkat ketergantungan yang tinggi pada utang baik di tingkat pemerintah maupun rumah tangga.
      Implikasi Detail terhadap Perekonomian Riil:
      Implikasi dari Utang Rumah Tangga per Kapita (RM 45,859):
      1. Daya Beli dan Konsumsi yang Tertekan:
      o Penjelasan: Sebagian besar pendapatan rumah tangga harus dialokasikan untuk membayar cicilan utang (KPR, KKB, kartu kredit, pinjaman pribadi).
      o Dampak Riil:
       Penurunan Konsumsi Barang dan Jasa Lain: Ketika sebagian besar pendapatan habis untuk utang, kemampuan rumah tangga untuk membeli barang dan jasa lain (selain kebutuhan pokok) akan berkurang. Konsumsi adalah motor utama pertumbuhan ekonomi di banyak negara.
       Risiko Resesi: Jika konsumsi rumah tangga menurun drastis, ini bisa memicu perlambatan ekonomi atau bahkan resesi.
       Tekanan pada Sektor Ritel: Bisnis ritel dan sektor jasa yang sangat bergantung pada pengeluaran konsumen akan mengalami penurunan penjualan dan profitabilitas.
      2. Stabilitas Keuangan Rumah Tangga yang Rentan:
      o Penjelasan: Tingkat utang yang tinggi membuat rumah tangga sangat rentan terhadap guncangan ekonomi.
      o Dampak Riil:
       Gagal Bayar (Default): Jika terjadi kehilangan pekerjaan, penurunan pendapatan, atau kenaikan suku bunga, banyak rumah tangga bisa kesulitan membayar utangnya, berujung pada gagal bayar.
       Krisis Keuangan Sistemik: Tingkat gagal bayar yang meluas bisa memicu krisis di sektor perbankan (karena bank memiliki piutang dari rumah tangga tersebut), yang pada gilirannya bisa mengguncang seluruh sistem keuangan.
       Kesehatan Mental dan Sosial: Tekanan utang yang berat juga berdampak pada kesehatan mental dan kualitas hidup masyarakat, yang secara tidak langsung memengaruhi produktivitas ekonomi.
      3. Hambatan Investasi dan Tabungan Rumah Tangga:
      o Penjelasan: Ketika pendapatan banyak digunakan untuk membayar utang, kapasitas rumah tangga untuk menabung atau berinvestasi menjadi terbatas.
      o Dampak Riil:
       Modal untuk Pensiun dan Pendidikan Berkurang: Kemampuan untuk mempersiapkan masa pensiun, pendidikan anak, atau investasi masa depan lainnya berkurang. Ini berpotensi menciptakan masalah sosial ekonomi di masa mendatang.
       Modal Produktif Berkurang: Secara agregat, tabungan rumah tangga adalah salah satu sumber modal penting bagi investasi produktif di perekonomian. Jika tabungan rendah, maka sumber modal ini juga berkurang.
      4. Kebijakan Moneter yang Terhambat:
      o Penjelasan: Bank sentral harus mempertimbangkan tingkat utang rumah tangga saat merumuskan kebijakan moneter (terutama suku bunga).
      o Dampak Riil:
       Dilema Suku Bunga: Jika bank sentral menaikkan suku bunga untuk mengendalikan inflasi, ini akan meningkatkan beban cicilan utang rumah tangga, berisiko memicu gagal bayar massal dan memperlambat ekonomi. Ini menempatkan bank sentral dalam dilema.
       Efektivitas Kebijakan Berkurang: Kebijakan moneter mungkin menjadi kurang efektif karena adanya tingkat utang yang tinggi.


      Hapus
  5. Akibat kensel ART sepihak,
    ringgit seblah dihajar dolar amrik haha!🤣😂🤣

    makanya negri🎰kasino genting, uda kecil gausa belagu dah apalagi berkhianat haha!🤥😤🤥

    menuju pala 5,
    minyak petrol & diesel NAIK, apa kabar haha!😁😄😁

    selamat jalan kaki & misank haha!🍌🤭🍌

    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    Ringgit Foreign Exchange Rates. Rates from the Interbank Foreign Exchange Market
    1 U.S. Dollar = RM 4.032
    https://www.bnm.gov.my/latest-rates

    BalasHapus
  6. Prabowo tak Berani kecam guys...., 🔥🔥🤣🤣



    3 Prajurit TNI Gugur di Lebanon, Prabowo Didesak Kecam AS-Israel dan Tarik Diri dari BoP

    https://www.suara.com/news/2026/04/01/135426/3-prajurit-tni-gugur-di-lebanon-prabowo-didesak-kecam-as-israel-dan-tarik-diri-dari-bop

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. Kau pur pengecut kalah debat lari tajuk kurs, defisit, Israel...focus lah kapan itu Lekiu yg sudah usang World War 2 diganti...gak malu ke...pakai kapal USANG ikut Latihan militer... Kelihatan MISKIN SANGAT....PADAHAL RINGGIT BERJAYE ...

      Hapus
    2. MALAYDESH HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
      -
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    3. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM LCS CASH = LOAN
      💰 1. LIMITED DOMESTIC DEFENSE BUDGET
      • Malaydesh’s defense budget is modest — around 1% of GDP, which restricts large-scale acquisitions.
      • Instead of upfront payments, Malaydesh often negotiates deferred payment schemes, installment plans, or loans backed by export credit agencies (ECAs) from supplier countries.
      • These financing models allow Malaydesh to acquire high-value assets without immediate fiscal strain.
      -----------------
      ⚙️ 2. Need for Advanced Technology and Capabilities
      Malaydesh lacks the domestic capacity to produce high-end military platforms, so it turns to foreign suppliers:
      Country Asset Procured Financing/Support Mechanism
      🇰🇷 South Korea FA-50 Light Combat Aircraft Industrial offsets, local assembly, favorable terms
      🇮🇹 Italy ATR-72 Maritime Patrol Aircraft G2G deal, possible ECA-backed financing
      🇹🇷 Turkey ANKA MALE Drones Strategic partnership, tech transfer
      These deals often include training, maintenance, and technology sharing, which Malaydesh cannot yet provide internally.
      -----------------
      🏭 3. Desire to Build Local Defense Industry
      Malaydesh wants to reduce dependency and stimulate its own defense ecosystem:
      • Offsets: Foreign suppliers agree to invest in Malaydesh’s defense industry or transfer technology.
      • Joint Ventures: Local firms like Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) are involved in assembly and integration.
      • Local Assembly: 14 of the FA-50 jets will be assembled in Malaydesh, building technical capacity.
      💸 Role of Loans in Defense Procurement
      While not always disclosed as “loans,” Malaydesh’s defense deals often involve:
      • Export Credit Agency (ECA) Financing: Countries like Italy and South Korea use ECAs to offer low-interest loans or guarantees to support defense exports.
      • G2G Agreements: These bypass middlemen and commissions, reducing corruption risks and allowing for more favorable financing terms3.
      • Strategic Installment Plans
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
      • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
      Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
      • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Scorpene Submarines (France, early 2000s):
      a. Procurement: Malaydesh acquired two Scorpene-class submarines from France.
      b. Financing Mechanism: The financing was primarily through loans from French banks.
      c. Role of Export Credit Agency: These loans were backed by the French government’s export credit agency (likely Coface). Coface guaranteed a significant portion of the loans, mitigating the risk for the French commercial banks. This made the banks more willing to lend to Malaydesh for such a large defense acquisition.
      d. Payment Structure: The contract involved payments stretched over many years, allowing Malaydesh to integrate the cost into its long-term defense budget rather than paying a huge lump sum upfront.
      e. Significance: This is a classic example of how ECAs facilitate large, complex defense sales by providing financial assurances.
      ----------------------
      2. PT-91M “Pendekar” Tanks (Poland):
      a. Procurement: Malaydesh acquired a number of PT-91M main battle tanks from Poland.
      b. Financing Mechanism: Reports indicate export credit financing from Poland/Europe. This means Polish banks, potentially supported by Polish or European ECAs, provided loans to Malaydesh.
      c. Reason for Financing: The "total contract was too large for Malaydesh’s defense budget in one year." This highlights the core purpose of loan financing: enabling significant purchases that would otherwise strain annual budgetary allocations.
      d. Significance: Demonstrates how financing helps overcome immediate budget constraints for substantial military hardware.
      ----------------------
      3. Littoral Combat Ship (LCS):
      a. Procurement: A program to build six Littoral Combat Ships locally in Malaydesh by Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS).
      b. Financing Mechanism: This was a mix of domestic and foreign financing.
       Domestic: Malaydeshn banks supported Boustead Naval Shipyard with loans. This is common in local defense industries, where domestic financial institutions provide working capital or project finance to the prime contractor.
       Government Payments: The Malaydeshn government made progressive payments to BNS as construction milestones were met. This is a common payment method for large projects, but often doesn't cover the full upfront cost, necessitating additional loans for the shipyard.
      c. Challenges: The mention of "Debt restructuring later became necessary due to delays" is crucial. Delays in project execution can lead to cost overruns, increased interest payments on loans, and a mismatch between payment schedules and project progress, often requiring renegotiation of financial terms.
      d. Significance: Shows how even domestically-built projects can rely on a complex web of financing, and the risks associated with project delays on financial stability.

      Hapus
    6. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM MPA UAV CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      Malaydesh's defense procurement strategy has historically involved a mix of direct cash purchases, government-to-government (G2G) deals, and increasingly, the use of loans and financing schemes. The shift towards greater reliance on loans is driven by several factors, including:
      1. Budgetary Constraints: Like many nations, Malaydesh faces pressure to balance defense spending with other national priorities such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Loans allow the Ministry of Defense (MINDEF) to acquire high-value assets without immediately drawing large sums from the annual budget.
      2. Modernization Needs: The Malaydeshn Armed Forces (MAF) are undergoing a continuous modernization process to maintain regional relevance and address evolving security threats. Modern military equipment, such as fighter jets, warships, and advanced missile systems, is incredibly expensive.
      3. Technological Advancement: Rapid advancements in defense technology mean that new equipment often comes with a hefty price tag. Loans help bridge the gap between budgetary allocations and the cost of acquiring cutting-edge systems.
      4. Economic Offsets and Industrial Participation: Often, loan agreements or large procurement contracts come with clauses for economic offsets, technology transfer, or local industrial participation. These can be attractive to the Malaydeshn government as they contribute to local economic development and build domestic defense capabilities.
      5. Payment Flexibility: Loans offer structured payment plans over several years, which can be more manageable for national finances compared to a single, large upfront Detailed Example: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Project
      -----------------
      The procurement of six Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) for the Royal Malaydeshn Navy (RMN) serves as a prime example of a large-scale defense project heavily reliant on financing.
      1. Initial Contract: The contract for the six LCS vessels was awarded to Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) in 2011, with a value exceeding RM9 billion (approximately USD2.1 billion at the time). The project involves the construction of Gowind-class corvettes designed by French company Naval Group (formerly DCNS).
      2. Financing Structure: While specific details of the financing structure are not always publicly disclosed due to commercial sensitivities, it is understood that the project involved a significant portion of financing that was not entirely upfront cash payment. This typically includes a mix of government allocations and loans, possibly from local banks or with government guarantees, spread over the construction period.
      3. Challenges and Delays: The LCS project has faced significant delays, cost overruns, and controversies. These issues highlight the risks associated with large, complex defense procurements, especially when financing is spread over many years. Delays can lead to increased interest payments and a greater overall cost.
      4. Impact of Loans: The use of financing allowed Malaydesh to embark on this ambitious naval modernization program, which is crucial for maritime security. However, the associated financial commitments, including loan repayments, become a long-term burden on the national budget. The controversies surrounding the project have also brought scrutiny to the transparency and accountability of such large-scale, loan-backed defense deals.

      Hapus
    7. 2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      • UTANG PEMERINTAH FEDERAL PER KAPITA: RM 36,139
      • UTANG RUMAH TANGGA PER KAPITA: RM 45,859
      Angka-angka ini cukup signifikan dan menunjukkan tingkat ketergantungan yang tinggi pada utang baik di tingkat pemerintah maupun rumah tangga.
      Implikasi Detail terhadap Perekonomian Riil:
      Implikasi dari Utang Pemerintah Federal per Kapita (RM 36,139):
      1. Beban Pelayanan Utang yang Lebih Tinggi:
      o Penjelasan: Dengan utang pemerintah yang besar, pemerintah harus mengalokasikan sebagian besar anggaran tahunannya untuk membayar bunga dan pokok utang. Ini disebut "beban pelayanan utang" (debt service).
      o Dampak Riil:
       Pengurangan Pengeluaran untuk Layanan Publik: Dana yang seharusnya bisa digunakan untuk investasi infrastruktur (jalan, jembatan, pelabuhan), pendidikan, kesehatan, riset dan pengembangan, atau program kesejahteraan sosial, justru habis untuk membayar utang. Ini menghambat pembangunan jangka panjang dan peningkatan kualitas hidup masyarakat.
       Kenaikan Pajak di Masa Depan: Untuk membiayai utang, pemerintah mungkin terpaksa menaikkan pajak (PPh, PPN, pajak korporasi) di masa depan. Kenaikan pajak ini akan mengurangi daya beli masyarakat dan laba perusahaan, yang pada gilirannya bisa memperlambat pertumbuhan ekonomi.
       Risiko Fiskal: Jika bunga utang naik secara signifikan atau pertumbuhan ekonomi melambat, kemampuan pemerintah untuk membayar utang bisa tertekan, meningkatkan risiko krisis fiskal.
      2. Ketergantungan pada Pasar Keuangan:
      o Penjelasan: Pemerintah harus terus-menerus mencari pinjaman baru (menerbitkan obligasi) untuk membiayai utang yang jatuh tempo atau 🦧GORILA IQ BOTOL = DEFISIT ANGGARAN.
      o Dampak Riil:
       Sensitivitas terhadap Suku Bunga: Pemerintah menjadi sangat sensitif terhadap perubahan suku bunga di pasar. Jika suku bunga global atau domestik naik, biaya pinjaman pemerintah akan melonjak, memperparah beban utang.
       Potensi "Crowding Out": Pinjaman pemerintah yang besar bisa menyedot dana dari pasar modal, sehingga mengurangi ketersediaan dana bagi sektor swasta untuk berinvestasi (ini disebut "crowding out"). Akibatnya, investasi swasta yang produktif bisa terhambat.
      3. Kredibilitas dan Peringkat Kredit Negara:
      o Penjelasan: Lembaga pemeringkat kredit (seperti Moody's, S&P, Fitch) mengevaluasi kemampuan negara untuk membayar utangnya.
      o Dampak Riil:
       Biaya Pinjaman Lebih Tinggi: Jika peringkat kredit negara turun karena tingkat utang yang tinggi, investor akan meminta imbal hasil (bunga) yang lebih tinggi untuk meminjamkan uang kepada pemerintah. Ini membuat biaya pinjaman semakin mahal.
       Citra Investor Negatif: Peringkat yang buruk juga bisa membuat investor asing ragu untuk berinvestasi di negara tersebut, mengurangi aliran modal asing langsung (FDI) yang penting untuk penciptaan lapangan kerja dan transfer teknologi.

      Hapus
  7. Minyak diesel seblah Naik yaa, kahsiyan haha!🔥🤪🔥
    ternyata impor, kena tipu lagi warganyet kl haha!🤥😁🤥

    kahsiyan harga nasi lemak Naik jugak haha!🤣😆🤣
    $%$%$%$%
    https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/773054/berita/nasional/diesel-naik-bakal-cetus-kesan-berantai---pakar

    BalasHapus
  8. sori yee kita langsung KUTUK didepan idung si rewel haha!🤣😤🤣

    bukan kabur dikejar CCG macam mmea kl haha!😂🤥😂
    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    Depan Israel! Dubes RI di PBB Kutuk Serangan Bikin Prajurit TNI Gugur di Lebanon
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=FI65l7FHDfM

    BalasHapus
  9. Untuk GENG GORILLA yang lompat lompat klaim kononnya harga minyak mereka murah... APBN MAKIN DEFISIT woiii..... 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣



    Purbaya Tambah Rp100 T Buat Subsidi BBM, Defisit APBN Diramal 2,9%

    https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20260401155941-4-723253/purbaya-tambah-rp100-t-buat-subsidi-bbm-defisit-apbn-diramal-29

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. Kau pur pengecut kalah debat lari tajuk kurs, defisit, Israel...focus lah kapan itu Lekiu yg sudah usang World War 2 diganti...gak malu ke...pakai kapal USANG ikut Latihan militer... Kelihatan MISKIN SANGAT....PADAHAL RINGGIT BERJAYE ...

      Hapus
    2. MALAYDESH HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
      -
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    3. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM LCS CASH = LOAN
      Keterlibatan 17 Kreditor: Sebuah Cerminan Kompleksitas dan Keparahan
      Angka 17 kreditor ini bukan hanya sekadar angka, melainkan indikator multi-dimensi dari masalah yang sangat serius:
      • Keparahan Masalah Keuangan: Jika BNS membutuhkan pinjaman dari begitu banyak lembaga, ini menunjukkan bahwa satu atau dua kreditor saja tidak cukup (atau tidak mau) menanggung seluruh risiko. Masing-masing kreditor mungkin hanya bersedia memberikan porsi kecil karena persepsi risiko yang tinggi.
      • Kerumitan Struktur Utang:
      o Berbagai Jenis Utang: Kemungkinan melibatkan berbagai jenis pinjaman: utang bank komersial, obligasi, pinjaman dari lembaga keuangan non-bank, mungkin juga pinjaman sindikasi (beberapa bank patungan memberikan pinjaman besar).
      o Jangka Waktu Berbeda: Pinjaman-pinjaman ini bisa memiliki jangka waktu pembayaran yang bervariasi (jangka pendek, menengah, panjang), suku bunga yang berbeda, dan persyaratan (covenant) yang unik. Ini membuat pengelolaan utang menjadi sangat kompleks dan rentan terhadap kesalahan.
      o Prioritas Pembayaran: Dalam skenario default, menentukan siapa yang harus dibayar terlebih dahulu dari 17 kreditor ini bisa menjadi sangat rumit dan seringkali berujung pada perselisihan hukum.
      • Indikasi Kepercayaan yang Menurun: Semakin banyak kreditor kecil yang terlibat dibandingkan satu atau dua kreditor besar, bisa menunjukkan bahwa kreditor besar memiliki kekhawatiran yang cukup besar sehingga mereka tidak mau mengambil risiko terlalu banyak.
      • Tekanan Konstan: Dengan begitu banyak pihak yang harus dilayani (pembayaran bunga, pokok pinjaman), BNS akan berada di bawah tekanan konstan untuk menghasilkan uang, yang seringkali menyebabkan keputusan bisnis yang kurang strategis atau terburu-buru.
      Dana Awal dari Pemerintah: Tidak Cukup atau Tidak Dikelola dengan Baik?
      Pernyataan ini menyentuh akar masalah yang mungkin terjadi pada tahap awal proyek:
      • Tidak Cukup:
      o Perencanaan Anggaran Buruk: Perencanaan awal mungkin meremehkan total biaya proyek atau mengabaikan potensi risiko yang membutuhkan dana cadangan.
      o Kenaikan Biaya Tak Terduga: Proyek mungkin menghadapi kenaikan harga bahan baku, perubahan regulasi, atau masalah teknis yang tidak diantisipasi, sehingga dana awal menjadi tidak memadai.
      • Tidak Dikelola dengan Baik: Ini adalah skenario yang lebih mengkhawatirkan dan seringkali berkaitan erat dengan "dugaan penyalahgunaan dana".
      o Boros: Pengeluaran yang tidak perlu, pembelian dengan harga mahal, atau operasional yang tidak efisien menghabiskan dana lebih cepat.
      o Tidak Transparan: Kurangnya akuntabilitas dalam penggunaan dana, membuat sulit untuk melacak ke mana uang itu pergi.
      o Pengalihan Dana: Dana pemerintah yang seharusnya untuk tujuan spesifik malah dialihkan untuk kepentingan lain (termasuk penyalahgunaan pribadi atau politik).

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Soft Loans (Government-to-Government or Export Credit Agencies):
      These are often provided by the exporting country's government or its export credit agency at favorable interest rates and repayment terms. They are typically used for large, strategic acquisitions.
      Example: Submarines (Scorpène Class from France)
      a. Asset: Two Perdana Menteri-class (Scorpène) submarines.
      b. Procurement: Acquired from France's DCNS (now Naval Group) and Spain's Navantia. The deal, signed in 2002, was reportedly financed through a combination of commercial loans and a government-backed credit facility from France and Spain. The total cost was around €1.08 billion (approximately RM4.7 billion at the time). The financing structure allowed Malaydesh to spread the cost over several years.
      c. Details: These loans are often tied to defense contracts, making it easier for developing nations to acquire sophisticated military technology. The repayment schedules are structured to be manageable for the acquiring nation's budget.
      -----------------
      2. Commercial Loans from Banks:
      For smaller acquisitions or when government-to-government loans are not available, Malaydesh might secure commercial loans from local or international banks. These loans are typically at market rates.
      Example: Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs)
      a. Asset: Various batches of Offshore Patrol Vessels (e.g., from local shipyards).
      b. Procurement: While some earlier OPVs might have been funded directly, more recent procurements or upgrades involving local shipyards could involve commercial financing. Shipyards often secure bank loans to fund construction, and the Malaydeshn government then pays in installments, which effectively means the procurement is supported by a form of commercial financing, albeit indirectly.
      c. Details: The government might issue guarantees for these loans, reducing the risk for commercial banks and potentially securing better terms.
      -----------------
      3. Direct Government Funding (Budget Allocation):
      While not a "loan" in the traditional sense, a significant portion of military procurement comes directly from the annual defense budget. However, even budget allocations can sometimes be backstopped by short-term government borrowing if immediate funds are insufficient.
      Example: Various smaller assets, maintenance, and upgrades.
      a. Asset: Armored vehicles, small arms, communication equipment, regular maintenance, and upgrades for existing platforms.
      b. Procurement: These are typically funded through direct allocations from the Ministry of Defence's annual budget. The funds are earmarked for specific projects or operational needs.
      c. Details: This method is preferred for recurring expenses or less capital-intensive acquisitions.
      -----------------
      4. Barter Trade or Counter-Trade (Less Common for Large Assets):
      While not a loan, historically some countries have used barter trade, where goods or services are exchanged for military assets. This is less common for high-value modern military assets but has been explored in the past.
      Example (Historical/Hypothetical): While no major recent Malaydeshn military acquisition definitively used direct barter for large assets, discussions have sometimes emerged in the context of palm oil or other commodities for defense purchases with certain countries. This is more relevant in the context of offsetting trade deficits rather than direct financing of the entire asset.

      Hapus
    6. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      🦧GORILA = NGEMIS QATAR SOFTLOAN ISTIF
      🦧GORILA = NGEMIS QATAR SOFTLOAN ISTIF
      🦧GORILA = NGEMIS QATAR SOFTLOAN ISTIF
      -
      https://www.malaydeshndefence.com/how-much-is-that-istif-frigate-in-the-window/
      It is likely that Qatar is providing a soft loan to Indonesia for the procurement of the two Istif frigates. Can it later be turned into a gift then? Of course, Qatar could do it if the Indonesian government asked for it.
      Can Malaydesh do the same, get Qatar, UAE or any Middle east country to offer soft loans for the procurement of military equipment and later be gifted ? Of course, but the government has to decide on the matter as you aware as there is nothing as a free horse.
      -----------------
      MALAYDESH ........
      GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% OF GDP
      FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEBT
      • END OF 2024: RM 1.25 TRILLION
      • END OF JUNE 2025: RM 1.3 TRILLION
      • PROJECTED DEBT-TO-GDP: 69% BY THE END OF 2025
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT
      2025 : RM1.73 TRILLION, OR 85.8% OF GDP
      ------------------
      DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : INCREASE DEBT
      DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : INCREASE DEBT
      2029 = 438,09 BILLION USD
      2028 = 412,2 BILLION USD
      2027 = 386,51 BILLION USD
      2026 = 362,19 BILLION USD
      2025 = 338,75 BILLION USD
      2024 = 316,15 BILLION USD
      2023 = 293,83 BILLION USD
      2022 = 271,49 BILLION USD
      2021 = 247,49 BILLION USD
      2020 = 221,49 BILLION USD
      -
      DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : DEBT PAY DEBT
      DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : OVERLIMIT DEBT
      2029 = 69,54% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2028 = 69,34% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2027 = 68,8% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2026 = 68,17% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2025 = 68,07% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2024 = 68,38% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2023 = 69,76% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2022 = 65,5% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2021 = 69,16% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      2020 = 67,69% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
      -
      HUTANG MALAYDESH (2018 - 2026):
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      1. Bloomberg & Reuters (2018–2019): Laporan awal pengungkapan utang yang menembus angka RM1 triliun.
      2. CNA (2020): Analisis lonjakan utang akibat belanja stimulus pandemi COVID-19.
      3. The Edge Malaydesh (2021–2022): Rekaman akumulasi utang federal yang mencapai RM1,38 triliun.
      4. MOF Portal & The Star (2023–2024): Konfirmasi PM Anwar Ibrahim mengenai total utang/liabilitas sebesar RM1,5 triliun dan estimasi kenaikan ke RM1,63 triliun.
      5. Bernama & Edge Weekly (2025–2026): Proyeksi anggaran dan tantangan utang jangka menengah yang menyentuh RM1,7 triliun..
      -
      BNM = HOUSEHOLD DEBT IS ONE OF THE HIGHEST IN THE ASEAN ......
      MALAYDESH household DEBT is one of the highest in the ASEAN region. Against this backdrop, Bank Negara MALAYDESH (BNM) safeguards financial stability by monitoring and regulating the lending activity of all financial institutions in MALAYDESH , among other thingsof the highest in the ASEAN region. Against this backdrop, Bank Negara MALAYDESH (BNM) safeguards financial stability

      Hapus
  10. 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣🤣



    APBN Dalam Tekanan: Saat Subsidi BBM & Listrik Jadi Bom Waktu Fiskal

    https://pluang.com/akademi/berita-analisis/APBN-dalam-tekanan

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. Kau pur pengecut kalah debat lari tajuk kurs, defisit, Israel...focus lah kapan itu Lekiu yg sudah usang World War 2 diganti...gak malu ke...pakai kapal USANG ikut Latihan militer... Kelihatan MISKIN SANGAT....PADAHAL RINGGIT BERJAYE ...

      Hapus
    2. BUKTI HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
      -
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    3. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM LCS CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. AKAR MASALAH: ALIRAN KAS (CASH FLOW) YANG BURUK
      • Definisi Aliran Kas: Aliran kas adalah pergerakan uang tunai masuk dan keluar dari sebuah perusahaan. Aliran kas positif berarti lebih banyak uang masuk daripada keluar, sedangkan aliran kas negatif berarti sebaliknya.
      • Mengapa Buruk?
      o Pendapatan Tidak Mencukupi: Proyek mungkin tidak menghasilkan pendapatan sesuai target, atau penjualan/layanan yang diberikan tidak mampu menutupi biaya operasional.
      o Biaya Operasional Tinggi: Biaya harian, gaji, pembelian bahan baku, pemeliharaan, dan sebagainya mungkin terlalu tinggi dibandingkan pendapatan.
      o Piutang Tak Tertagih: Pelanggan atau pihak yang berhutang kepada BNS mungkin menunggak pembayaran, menyebabkan uang yang seharusnya masuk tertahan.
      o Investasi yang Tidak Produktif: Dana mungkin diinvestasikan pada aset yang tidak menghasilkan keuntungan cepat, atau bahkan mengalami kerugian.
      o Siklus Proyek yang Panjang: Untuk proyek infrastruktur atau pengembangan besar, waktu antara pengeluaran awal dan penerimaan pendapatan bisa sangat panjang, membutuhkan manajemen kas yang ketat.
      -----------------
      2. Pemicu Masalah: Dugaan Penyalahgunaan Dana
      Ini adalah faktor yang sangat memperburuk masalah aliran kas dan mendorong ketergantungan pada pinjaman.
      • Definisi Penyalahgunaan Dana: Tindakan menggunakan dana untuk tujuan yang tidak semestinya, tidak sah, atau di luar tujuan yang telah ditetapkan. Ini bisa berupa korupsi, penggelapan, pembelian aset pribadi, atau pengeluaran fiktif.
      • Dampak Negatif:
      o Pengurasan Dana Proyek: Dana yang seharusnya digunakan untuk operasional, investasi produktif, atau pembayaran kewajiban, malah dialihkan. Ini secara instan menciptakan defisit kas.
      o Peningkatan Kebutuhan Pinjaman: Dengan dana internal yang terkuras, BNS terpaksa mencari sumber dana eksternal, yaitu pinjaman, hanya untuk menjaga proyek tetap berjalan atau menutupi lubang yang diciptakan oleh penyalahgunaan.
      o Kerugian Kepercayaan Investor/Pemerintah: Jika terbukti ada penyalahgunaan, kepercayaan dari pihak-pihak yang telah memberikan dana awal (misalnya pemerintah) akan hancur, mempersulit akses pendanaan di masa depan.
      o Masalah Hukum: Penyalahgunaan dana hampir selalu berujung pada konsekuensi hukum serius bagi pihak yang terlibat.
      -----------------
      3. Fenomena "Galakan Pinjaman" (Pinjam untuk Menutupi Pinjaman Lama)
      Ketika aliran kas terus bermasalah dan ada penyalahgunaan dana, entitas seringkali masuk ke dalam lingkaran setan:
      • Pinjaman baru diambil bukan untuk ekspansi atau investasi produktif, tetapi semata-mata untuk membayar bunga pinjaman lama atau menutupi defisit operasional.
      • Ini adalah tanda bahaya serius dalam keuangan, karena beban utang terus menumpuk tanpa adanya peningkatan kapasitas pembayaran dari operasional inti.

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      USE OF LOANS IN DEFENSE PROCUREMENT
      1. Why Loans Are Used
      a. Budget Limits: Malaydesh’s annual defense budget is relatively modest (about RM15–20 billion in recent years). Buying big-ticket items like submarines, frigates, or fighter jets in one year would swallow a large chunk of the budget.
      b. Need for Modernization: To maintain regional balance (especially with neighbors like Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam), Malaydesh wants to modernize across all services (army, navy, air force) simultaneously.
      c. Smoothing Expenditure: Loans allow Malaydesh to spread payments over 5–15 years, instead of paying everything upfront.
      d. Political Optics: Loans make it easier for governments to announce “big” purchases without creating sudden budget spikes.
      ________________________________________
      2. Where the Loans Come From
      a. Foreign Export Credit Agencies (ECAs):
      o Example: France’s COFACE, Germany’s Euler Hermes, South Korea’s KEXIM.
      o These agencies guarantee loans tied to purchases from their industries.
      b. International Banks / Syndicated Loans:
      o Global banks provide financing secured by sovereign guarantees.
      c. Domestic Financing:
      o Malaydesh sometimes uses local banks or issues government bonds to support large contracts (especially if local shipyards are involved).
      ________________________________________
      3. How the Loans Are Structured
      a. Buyer’s Credit (Tied Loans):
      Malaydesh borrows from the supplier’s country → money must be spent on that country’s defense products.
      b. Supplier’s Credit:
      The vendor arranges financing on Malaydesh’s behalf.
      c. Mixed Financing:
      Part loan, part direct allocation from Malaydesh’s budget.
      d. Grace Periods:
      Often 3–5 years before repayment begins, matching the delivery of ships/planes.
      e. Repayment Terms:
      Usually 5–15 years, in USD or EUR, sometimes with concessional interest if linked to government-to-government deals.
      ________________________________________
      4. Examples of Loan-Financed Procurement
      a. Scorpene Submarines (France, early 2000s):
      Financed with loans from French banks, backed by the French government’s export credit agency. Payments stretched over many years.
      b. PT-91M “Pendekar” Tanks (Poland):
      Reports suggest export credit financing from Poland/Europe, since the total contract was too large for Malaydesh’s defense budget in one year.
      c. Littoral Combat Ship (LCS):
      Domestic + foreign financing mix. Malaydeshn banks supported Boustead Naval Shipyard with loans, while the government made progressive payments. Debt restructuring later became necessary due to delays.
      d. FA-50M Fighter Jets (South Korea, 2023):
      Likely tied to Korean financing packages (KEXIM export credit), though details not fully disclosed. A typical arrangement for aircraft sales from Korea.
      e. NGPVs (Kedah-class Patrol Vessels, 1990s–2000s):
      Built locally under a German license; financing reportedly included German export credit facilities.
      ________________________________________
      5. Weaknesses & Risks
      a. Debt Burden: Defense loans tie up future budgets for repayments.
      b. Currency Risk: Loans often in USD/EUR; if the ringgit weakens, repayment costs rise.
      c. Tied Procurement: Malaydesh is locked into buying from the lending country, limiting competition.
      d. Project Delays: If assets (e.g., LCS) are delayed, Malaydesh is already servicing debt without receiving capability.
      e. Transparency Issues: Loan terms and repayment schedules are often not publicly disclosed.

      Hapus
  11. Parah....... 🔥🔥🤣🤣



    Tambahan subsidi energi Rp100 T dinilai hanya tahan sementara, risiko fiskal mengintai

    https://www.msn.com/id-id/berita/nasional/tambahan-subsidi-energi-rp100-t-dinilai-hanya-tahan-sementara-risiko-fiskal-mengintai/ar-AA1ZUj0J?apiversion=v2&domshim=1&noservercache=1&noservertelemetry=1&batchservertelemetry=1&renderwebcomponents=1&wcseo=1

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. Kau pur pengecut kalah debat lari tajuk kurs, defisit, Israel...focus lah kapan itu Lekiu yg sudah usang World War 2 diganti...gak malu ke...pakai kapal USANG ikut Latihan militer... Kelihatan MISKIN SANGAT....PADAHAL RINGGIT BERJAYE ...

      Hapus
    2. BUKTI HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
      -
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    3. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      📌 1. What is the “Chronic Allocation Problem”?
      Malaydesh defense budget suffers from structural imbalances:
      • ~70% → Salaries, pensions, allowances.
      • ~20–25% → Operations & maintenance (O&M).
      • <10% → Development (procurement, modernization).
      This pattern has persisted for decades, regardless of who is in power. It’s “chronic” because it doesn’t change year to year — it is baked into Malaydesh defense system.
      ________________________________________
      📌 2. Why So Skewed?
      1. Large manpower-heavy force → Army dominates with many personnel, each entitled to allowances & pensions.
      2. Political incentives → Governments prefer to expand or protect jobs and welfare (pensions, veterans’ benefits) rather than invest in long-term modernization.
      3. Rigid financial system → Once salaries & pensions are committed, they are “locked in,” leaving procurement squeezed.
      4. Weak multi-year planning → Budgets are annual, so each year O&M & salaries get priority over new projects.
      ________________________________________
      📌 3. Effects on the Armed Forces
      ✈️ Air Force (RMAF)
      • Insufficient flying hours → pilots often below NATO standards.
      • Can’t afford to maintain multiple fleets (Su-30, F/A-18D, Hawks).
      • Retirement of MiG-29 left gap, but MRCA replacement delayed decades due to budget.
      ________________________________________
      🚢 Navy (RMN)
      • Modernization projects (e.g., LCS frigates) stalled because there’s no steady development funding.
      • Existing fleet spends fewer days at sea due to limited fuel allocations.
      • Submarines (Scorpène) struggle with high operational costs.
      ________________________________________
      🪖 Army (TDM)
      • Personnel-heavy structure consumes most of the salary budget.
      • Modernization of armored vehicles, artillery, and air defense delayed.
      • Training often limited to small-scale jungle exercises (cheap but outdated for modern warfare).
      ________________________________________
      📌 4. Macro-Level Consequences
      1. Modernization Paralysis
      o Malaydesh buys one “prestige project” (e.g., Scorpène, Su-30, LCS) but can’t follow through with sustainment.
      o No continuous upgrade pipeline.
      2. Readiness Erosion
      o Without sufficient O&M funding, equipment availability drops.
      o Spare parts shortages → many assets grounded or idle.
      3. Capability Gaps Widen
      o Neighbors move ahead with systematic modernization (Singapore F-35, Indonesia MEF).
      o Malaydesh falls behind, unable to replace aging fleets.
      4. Low Return on Investment
      o Billions spent on prestige platforms, but underutilized due to fuel & training cuts.
      o Example: Su-30MKM — advanced but rarely flown compared to RSAF F-15SG or RTAF Gripens.
      5. Morale & Retention Issues
      o Soldiers see little investment in training or new kit.
      o Skilled personnel (especially pilots, engineers) leave for commercial jobs.

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM LCS CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Tata Kelola dan Korupsi yang Buruk:
      • Skandal Korupsi: Ini adalah akar masalah utama. Proyek LCS telah dirundung tuduhan korupsi, penyalahgunaan dana, dan konflik kepentingan sejak awal. Penyelidikan oleh berbagai badan, termasuk Komite Akuntan Publik (PAC) parlemen Malaydesh dan Komisi Anti-Korupsi Malaydesh (MACC), telah mengungkap banyak anomali.
      • Pengambilan Keputusan yang Meragukan: Keputusan-keputusan penting dalam proyek, seperti pemilihan desain kapal (Gowind class dari Naval Group Prancis), seringkali dipertanyakan apakah didasarkan pada pertimbangan teknis terbaik atau kepentingan lain.
      • Kurangnya Transparansi: Kurangnya transparansi dalam kontrak, pengadaan, dan alur pembayaran telah mempersulit pengawasan dan akuntabilitas.
      -----------------
      2. Masalah Finansial dan Pembengkakan Biaya:
      • Pembengkakan Anggaran: Biaya proyek telah melonjak jauh dari perkiraan awal. Kontrak senilai RM9 miliar (sekitar USUSD2,1 miliar) untuk enam kapal LCS pada tahun 2011 kini diperkirakan membutuhkan lebih banyak lagi, padahal belum ada satu pun kapal yang selesai.
      • Misappropriasi Dana: Sebagian besar uang yang dibayarkan di muka kepada kontraktor utama, Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), diduga tidak digunakan untuk pembelian komponen atau pembangunan kapal, melainkan dialihkan atau disalahgunakan. Ini menyebabkan BNS gagal membayar sub-kontraktor dan pemasok.
      • Ketergantungan pada Pinjaman: Karena masalah aliran kas dan dugaan penyalahgunaan dana, BNS dan entitas terkait harus bergantung pada pinjaman dari berbagai lembaga keuangan. Keterlibatan 17 kreditor menunjukkan betapa parahnya masalah keuangan yang dihadapi BNS dan betapa rumitnya struktur utang proyek ini. Ini juga mengindikasikan bahwa dana awal dari pemerintah tidak cukup atau tidak dikelola dengan baik.
      -----------------
      3. Ketidakmampuan Kontraktor Utama (Boustead Naval Shipyard - BNS):
      • Kurangnya Kapabilitas Teknis dan Manajerial: Meskipun BNS memiliki pengalaman dalam pembangunan dan perbaikan kapal, proyek LCS dengan skala dan kompleksitas ini mungkin di luar kapasitasnya. Ada dugaan bahwa BNS tidak memiliki keahlian teknis yang memadai untuk mengelola proyek sebesar ini secara efektif.
      • Manajemen Proyek yang Buruk: Penjadwalan, pengadaan material, dan koordinasi antara berbagai pihak (desainer, pemasok, sub-kontraktor) sangat buruk. Ini menyebabkan penundaan yang signifikan dalam setiap tahap pembangunan.
      • Masalah Rantai Pasokan: Kegagalan BNS membayar sub-kontraktor dan pemasok menyebabkan terhentinya pasokan komponen penting. Banyak peralatan yang sudah dipesan tidak dapat dikirim karena pembayaran yang tertunda.
      -----------------
      4. Campur Tangan Politik dan Perubahan Kebijakan:
      • Perubahan Pemerintah: Pergantian pemerintahan di Malaydesh (misalnya, setelah pemilu 2018 dan 2020) seringkali membawa tinjauan ulang terhadap proyek-proyek besar. Ini bisa menunda keputusan, mengubah arah, atau mengungkap masalah sebelumnya.
      • Kurangnya Visi Jangka Panjang: Kebijakan pertahanan dan pengadaan seringkali terpengaruh oleh siklus politik jangka pendek, yang dapat mengganggu kontinuitas dan perencanaan strategis proyek jangka panjang seperti pembangunan kapal perang.

      Hapus
    6. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Identification of Needs:
      The Malaydeshn Armed Forces (MAF) first identifies its operational requirements and strategic defense needs. This involves assessments of current threats, technological advancements, and the lifespan of existing equipment. For example, the Royal Malaydeshn Navy might identify a need for new littoral mission ships (LMS) or the Royal Malaydeshn Air Force for multi-role combat aircraft.
      -----------------
      2. Budget Allocation and Approval:
      Defense spending is a significant part of the national budget. The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) prepares budget proposals, which are then subject to approval by the Malaydeshn Parliament. For major acquisitions, special allocations or supplementary budgets may be required.
      -----------------
      3. Procurement Methods:
      Malaydesh employs various procurement methods, including:
      * Direct Negotiation: For specialized equipment or where only a few suppliers exist, direct negotiation with manufacturers or foreign governments is common.
      * International Tendering: For more competitive markets, international tenders are issued, allowing various global defense contractors to bid.
      * Government-to-Government (G2G) Agreements: Sometimes, procurement is done directly between the Malaydeshn government and a foreign government, which can facilitate financing options.
      -----------------
      4. Financing Options – How Loans Come In:
      When the outright purchase of military equipment is too costly for the immediate national budget, loans become a crucial financing mechanism. Here are the common sources and types of loans:
      • Commercial Bank Loans:
      a. Syndicated Loans: A group of banks might come together to provide a large loan to the Malaydeshn government or a specific government entity responsible for procurement. These are often arranged through international financial institutions.
      b. Export Credit Agencies (ECAs): Many countries that export defense equipment have ECAs (e.g., UKEF in the UK, EXIM Bank in the US, Euler Hermes in Germany). These agencies provide loan guarantees, direct loans, or insurance to facilitate exports from their respective countries. If Malaydesh buys equipment from a French company, for instance, a French ECA might offer favorable financing terms to secure the deal for the French exporter. This is a very common source of financing for defense deals.
      • Foreign Government Loans/Credits:
      a. Soft Loans/Concessional Loans: Sometimes, a foreign government might offer loans with very favorable terms (low interest rates, long repayment periods) as part of a broader diplomatic or strategic partnership, or to stimulate their own defense industry's exports.
      b. Defense Cooperation Agreements: These agreements can sometimes include provisions for financial assistance or credit lines for military purchases.
      • Bonds/Sukuk:
      a. The Malaydeshn government could issue sovereign bonds or Islamic bonds (Sukuk) in domestic or international markets to raise funds for general expenditure, which could include military procurement. While not direct "loans" for a specific piece of equipment, they are a way to raise capital.

      Hapus
  12. lah BBM Fuel negri🎰kasino genting ternyata NAEK haha!🤪🔥🤪
    minyak bensin 28%
    minyak diesel 58%
    katanya punya petronas, kok harga naik???
    kahsiyan para warganyet kl DITIPU PMX LAGIIIIII haha!🤥🍌🤥

    lah kita 0%, BBM aman..tak naik hore haha!🥳🤗🥳
    malah ke KORYO mau SHOPPING BORAMAE hore haah!🤑✌️🤑

    kl, KALAH LAGIIII..warganuet NGAMUK🔥

    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=978096264562225&id=100070855821296

    BalasHapus
  13. APBN kita lebih banyak Surplus,
    lah negri🎰kasino genting, DEFISIT terus sedjak 1998 haha!🤥🤣🤥

    ehhh ini Sabda YDPA, warganyet kl tak bisa lawan fakta, apalagi pmx haha!🤥🍌🤥

    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    'Saya kecewa' - Agong khuatir mengenai beban hutang kerajaan
    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/OaQeD-P_olI

    BalasHapus
  14. MALAYDESH HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
    -
    PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
    2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
    3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
    4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
    5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
    2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
    4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
    ---------------------------------
    HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
    -
    SUMBER :
    Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
    --------------------------------_
    Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
    2010: 150 miliar USD
    2011: 165 miliar USD
    2012: 180 miliar USD
    2013: 195 miliar USD
    2014: 210 miliar USD
    2015: 225 miliar USD
    2016: 240 miliar USD
    2017: 255 miliar USD
    2018: 270 miliar USD
    2019: 285 miliar USD
    2020: 300 miliar USD
    2021: 315 miliar USD
    2022: 330 miliar USD
    2023: 345 miliar USD
    2024: 360 miliar USD
    2025: 375 miliar USD
    -
    SUMBER :
    BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
    Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
    2010 = 52.4
    2011 = 51.8
    2012 = 53.3
    2013 = 54.7
    2014 = 55.0
    2015 = 55.1
    2016 = 52.7
    2017 = 51.9
    2018 = 52.5
    2019 = 52.4
    2020 = 62.0
    2021 = 63.3
    2022 = 60.2
    2023 = 64.3
    2024 = 70.4
    2025 = 69.0
    -
    SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
    2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
    2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
    2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
    2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
    2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
    2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
    2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
    2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
    2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
    2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
    2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
    2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
    2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
    2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
    -
    SUMBER:
    IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

    BalasHapus
  15. Tambahan subsidi energi Rp100 T dinilai hanya tahan sementara, risiko fiskal mengintai

    https://www.msn.com/id-id/berita/nasional/tambahan-subsidi-energi-rp100-t-dinilai-hanya-tahan-sementara-risiko-fiskal-mengintai/ar-AA1ZUj0J?apiversion=v2&domshim=1&noservercache=1&noservertelemetry=1&batchservertelemetry=1&renderwebcomponents=1&wcseo=1

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. MALAYDESH HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
      -
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Key Aspects of Loan Agreements in Malaydeshn Defense:
      • Terms and Conditions:
      o Interest Rates: Fixed or variable, often a critical factor in the overall cost.
      o Repayment Period: Can range from several years to over a decade, depending on the loan amount and type.
      o Grace Periods: A period before repayment begins, allowing time for project implementation.
      o Collateral/Guarantees: While sovereign loans rarely involve physical collateral, they are backed by the full faith and credit of the Malaydeshn government.
      • Offset/Industrial Participation:
      o Description: Loan agreements for major defense purchases often include offset clauses. This means the exporting country or company commits to investing in Malaydesh, transferring technology, or procuring goods and services from Malaydeshn companies.
      o Purpose: To mitigate the outflow of funds, develop local industries, and create jobs. This can be a significant benefit that sweetens the deal for Malaydesh.
      • Transparency and Oversight:
      o Parliamentary Approval: Large defense procurements and associated loans usually require parliamentary approval in Malaydesh, especially for inclusion in the national budget.
      o Public Scrutiny: Defense spending and borrowing can be subjects of public and media scrutiny, especially concerning value for money, allegations of corruption, or strategic alignment.
      o Audits: Loan utilization and project implementation are subject to government audits to ensure accountability.
      -----------------
      2. Recent Examples and Trends:
      • Scorpene Submarines (France): The acquisition of two Scorpene-class submarines from France in the early 2000s involved significant financing arrangements, reportedly including a mix of commercial loans and possibly G2G support. This deal, however, became controversial due to corruption allegations, though investigations cleared Malaydeshn officials.
      • Littoral Combat Ships (LCS): The ongoing LCS project has faced severe delays and cost overruns. While not purely a loan issue, the financing structure and payment schedules have been central to the project's difficulties, highlighting the complexities of managing large defense contracts.
      • Future Acquisitions: Malaydesh is looking to modernize its air force (e.g., FA-50 light combat aircraft from Korea) and naval assets. These future acquisitions will undoubtedly involve various financing strategies, potentially including G2G loans, ECA support, and commercial borrowing, tailored to each specific deal.
      Challenges and Considerations:
      • Debt Burden: Excessive borrowing for defense can strain national finances, especially if economic growth slows.
      • Currency Fluctuations: Loans denominated in foreign currencies expose Malaydesh to exchange rate risks.
      • Cost Overruns: Large projects are prone to cost overruns, which can increase the overall debt burden beyond initial projections.
      • Maintenance and Lifecycle Costs: Beyond the initial purchase, the long-term maintenance, training, and operational costs of defense assets are substantial and must be factored into financial planning.

      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Identification of Needs:
      The Malaydeshn Armed Forces (MAF) first identifies its operational requirements and strategic defense needs. This involves assessments of current threats, technological advancements, and the lifespan of existing equipment. For example, the Royal Malaydeshn Navy might identify a need for new littoral mission ships (LMS) or the Royal Malaydeshn Air Force for multi-role combat aircraft.
      -----------------
      2. Budget Allocation and Approval:
      Defense spending is a significant part of the national budget. The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) prepares budget proposals, which are then subject to approval by the Malaydeshn Parliament. For major acquisitions, special allocations or supplementary budgets may be required.
      -----------------
      3. Procurement Methods:
      Malaydesh employs various procurement methods, including:
      * Direct Negotiation: For specialized equipment or where only a few suppliers exist, direct negotiation with manufacturers or foreign governments is common.
      * International Tendering: For more competitive markets, international tenders are issued, allowing various global defense contractors to bid.
      * Government-to-Government (G2G) Agreements: Sometimes, procurement is done directly between the Malaydeshn government and a foreign government, which can facilitate financing options.
      -----------------
      4. Financing Options – How Loans Come In:
      When the outright purchase of military equipment is too costly for the immediate national budget, loans become a crucial financing mechanism. Here are the common sources and types of loans:
      • Commercial Bank Loans:
      a. Syndicated Loans: A group of banks might come together to provide a large loan to the Malaydeshn government or a specific government entity responsible for procurement. These are often arranged through international financial institutions.
      b. Export Credit Agencies (ECAs): Many countries that export defense equipment have ECAs (e.g., UKEF in the UK, EXIM Bank in the US, Euler Hermes in Germany). These agencies provide loan guarantees, direct loans, or insurance to facilitate exports from their respective countries. If Malaydesh buys equipment from a French company, for instance, a French ECA might offer favorable financing terms to secure the deal for the French exporter. This is a very common source of financing for defense deals.
      • Foreign Government Loans/Credits:
      a. Soft Loans/Concessional Loans: Sometimes, a foreign government might offer loans with very favorable terms (low interest rates, long repayment periods) as part of a broader diplomatic or strategic partnership, or to stimulate their own defense industry's exports.
      b. Defense Cooperation Agreements: These agreements can sometimes include provisions for financial assistance or credit lines for military purchases.
      • Bonds/Sukuk:
      a. The Malaydeshn government could issue sovereign bonds or Islamic bonds (Sukuk) in domestic or international markets to raise funds for general expenditure, which could include military procurement. While not direct "loans" for a specific piece of equipment, they are a way to raise capital.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      Malaydesh's approach to financing large-scale defense acquisitions often involves the use of loan agreements :
      1. The Need for Loan Agreements
      • High Cost of Modern Defense Systems: Modern military equipment, such as fighter jets, naval vessels, submarines, air defense systems, and advanced armored vehicles, are extremely expensive. A single major acquisition can easily exceed Malaydesh's annual defense budget.
      • Budgetary Constraints: While Malaydesh allocates a significant portion of its budget to defense, there are always competing demands from other sectors like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and social welfare. This limits the amount that can be immediately spent on defense acquisitions.
      • Long-Term Modernization Goals: Malaydesh has a continuous need to modernize its armed forces to maintain regional security, protect its sovereignty, and respond to evolving threats. Loan agreements facilitate these long-term strategic objectives by spreading the financial burden over several years.
      -----------------
      2. Sources of Loans
      Malaydesh can tap into various sources for these defense-related loans:
      • Foreign Governments (Government-to-Government Loans):
      o Direct Financing: Often, a selling country's government (e.g., France, the UK, Germany, South Korea) will offer direct government-backed loans or credit lines to Malaydesh to facilitate the purchase of their defense products. This can be part of a larger diplomatic or trade package.
      o Export Credit Agencies (ECAs): Many countries have ECAs (e.g., UK Export Finance, COFACE in France, Euler Hermes in Germany) that provide guarantees or direct loans to support their national defense industries' exports. These loans often come with favorable terms.
      o Advantages: These loans can sometimes offer lower interest rates, longer repayment periods, and more flexible terms than commercial loans, as they are often intertwined with strategic partnerships.
      • International Banks/Financial Institutions:
      o Commercial Loans: Malaydesh can secure loans from large international commercial banks or consortia of banks. These are typically market-rate loans, but for large sums, they might involve syndicated lending (multiple banks pooling resources).
      o Multilateral Development Banks (Less Common for Direct Defense): While institutions like the World Bank or Asian Development Bank typically don't finance direct defense purchases, they might fund related infrastructure projects that indirectly support defense capabilities (e.g., port upgrades that could also be used by naval vessels). However, direct defense financing from these is rare.
      o Advantages: Access to a broad pool of capital, competitive terms, and expertise in structuring complex financial deals.
      • Domestic Financial Institutions:
      o Local Banks/Bond Markets: For some acquisitions, especially those involving local content or smaller components, Malaydesh might secure loans from domestic banks or issue defense bonds in the local financial market.
      o Advantages: Reduces exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, strengthens domestic financial markets, and can be politically more palatable.

      Hapus
  16. MALAYDESH HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
    -
    PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
    2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
    3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
    4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
    5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
    2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
    4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
    ---------------------------------
    HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
    -
    SUMBER :
    Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
    --------------------------------_
    Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
    2010: 150 miliar USD
    2011: 165 miliar USD
    2012: 180 miliar USD
    2013: 195 miliar USD
    2014: 210 miliar USD
    2015: 225 miliar USD
    2016: 240 miliar USD
    2017: 255 miliar USD
    2018: 270 miliar USD
    2019: 285 miliar USD
    2020: 300 miliar USD
    2021: 315 miliar USD
    2022: 330 miliar USD
    2023: 345 miliar USD
    2024: 360 miliar USD
    2025: 375 miliar USD
    -
    SUMBER :
    BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
    Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
    2010 = 52.4
    2011 = 51.8
    2012 = 53.3
    2013 = 54.7
    2014 = 55.0
    2015 = 55.1
    2016 = 52.7
    2017 = 51.9
    2018 = 52.5
    2019 = 52.4
    2020 = 62.0
    2021 = 63.3
    2022 = 60.2
    2023 = 64.3
    2024 = 70.4
    2025 = 69.0
    -
    SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
    2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
    2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
    2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
    2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
    2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
    2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
    2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
    2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
    2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
    2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
    2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
    2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
    2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
    2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
    -
    SUMBER:
    IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

    BalasHapus
  17. MALAYDESH HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG ....
    -
    PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
    2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
    3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
    4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
    5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
    2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
    4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
    ---------------------------------
    HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
    -
    SUMBER :
    Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
    --------------------------------_
    Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
    2010: 150 miliar USD
    2011: 165 miliar USD
    2012: 180 miliar USD
    2013: 195 miliar USD
    2014: 210 miliar USD
    2015: 225 miliar USD
    2016: 240 miliar USD
    2017: 255 miliar USD
    2018: 270 miliar USD
    2019: 285 miliar USD
    2020: 300 miliar USD
    2021: 315 miliar USD
    2022: 330 miliar USD
    2023: 345 miliar USD
    2024: 360 miliar USD
    2025: 375 miliar USD
    -
    SUMBER :
    BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
    Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
    2010 = 52.4
    2011 = 51.8
    2012 = 53.3
    2013 = 54.7
    2014 = 55.0
    2015 = 55.1
    2016 = 52.7
    2017 = 51.9
    2018 = 52.5
    2019 = 52.4
    2020 = 62.0
    2021 = 63.3
    2022 = 60.2
    2023 = 64.3
    2024 = 70.4
    2025 = 69.0
    -
    SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
    2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
    2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
    2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
    2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
    2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
    2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
    2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
    2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
    2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
    2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
    2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
    2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
    2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
    2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
    -
    SUMBER:
    IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

    BalasHapus
  18. INDONESIA BRAHMANA = SHOPPING DIMANA-MANA
    MALAYDESH DALIT = SHOPPING SULIT
    -
    PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
    2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
    3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
    4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
    5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
    2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
    4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
    ---------------------------------
    HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
    -
    SUMBER :
    Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
    --------------------------------_
    Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
    2010: 150 miliar USD
    2011: 165 miliar USD
    2012: 180 miliar USD
    2013: 195 miliar USD
    2014: 210 miliar USD
    2015: 225 miliar USD
    2016: 240 miliar USD
    2017: 255 miliar USD
    2018: 270 miliar USD
    2019: 285 miliar USD
    2020: 300 miliar USD
    2021: 315 miliar USD
    2022: 330 miliar USD
    2023: 345 miliar USD
    2024: 360 miliar USD
    2025: 375 miliar USD
    -
    SUMBER :
    BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
    Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
    2010 = 52.4
    2011 = 51.8
    2012 = 53.3
    2013 = 54.7
    2014 = 55.0
    2015 = 55.1
    2016 = 52.7
    2017 = 51.9
    2018 = 52.5
    2019 = 52.4
    2020 = 62.0
    2021 = 63.3
    2022 = 60.2
    2023 = 64.3
    2024 = 70.4
    2025 = 69.0
    -
    SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
    2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
    2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
    2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
    2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
    2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
    2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
    2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
    2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
    2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
    2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
    2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
    2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
    2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
    2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
    -
    SUMBER:
    IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

    BalasHapus
  19. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
    1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
    Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
    -
    MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
    2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
    3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
    4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
    5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
    2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
    4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
    ---------------------------------
    HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
    -
    SUMBER :
    Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
    --------------------------------_
    Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
    2010: 150 miliar USD
    2011: 165 miliar USD
    2012: 180 miliar USD
    2013: 195 miliar USD
    2014: 210 miliar USD
    2015: 225 miliar USD
    2016: 240 miliar USD
    2017: 255 miliar USD
    2018: 270 miliar USD
    2019: 285 miliar USD
    2020: 300 miliar USD
    2021: 315 miliar USD
    2022: 330 miliar USD
    2023: 345 miliar USD
    2024: 360 miliar USD
    2025: 375 miliar USD
    -
    SUMBER :
    BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
    Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
    2010 = 52.4
    2011 = 51.8
    2012 = 53.3
    2013 = 54.7
    2014 = 55.0
    2015 = 55.1
    2016 = 52.7
    2017 = 51.9
    2018 = 52.5
    2019 = 52.4
    2020 = 62.0
    2021 = 63.3
    2022 = 60.2
    2023 = 64.3
    2024 = 70.4
    2025 = 69.0
    -
    SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
    2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
    2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
    2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
    2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
    2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
    2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
    2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
    2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
    2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
    2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
    2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
    2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
    2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
    2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
    -
    SUMBER:
    IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

    BalasHapus
  20. Kita lihat selama mana Menteri kewangan INDIANESIA sanggup menahan harga minyak ya guys... 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣

    1. APBN DEFISIT MAKIN MELEBAR
    2. RUPIAH DAN BURSA MAKIN HANCUR

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    2. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    3. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    4. Haaaaaaaaaa...,...😝🤣😀
      -
      1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. Key Aspects of Loan Agreements in Malaydeshn Defense:
      • Terms and Conditions:
      o Interest Rates: Fixed or variable, often a critical factor in the overall cost.
      o Repayment Period: Can range from several years to over a decade, depending on the loan amount and type.
      o Grace Periods: A period before repayment begins, allowing time for project implementation.
      o Collateral/Guarantees: While sovereign loans rarely involve physical collateral, they are backed by the full faith and credit of the Malaydeshn government.
      • Offset/Industrial Participation:
      o Description: Loan agreements for major defense purchases often include offset clauses. This means the exporting country or company commits to investing in Malaydesh, transferring technology, or procuring goods and services from Malaydeshn companies.
      o Purpose: To mitigate the outflow of funds, develop local industries, and create jobs. This can be a significant benefit that sweetens the deal for Malaydesh.
      • Transparency and Oversight:
      o Parliamentary Approval: Large defense procurements and associated loans usually require parliamentary approval in Malaydesh, especially for inclusion in the national budget.
      o Public Scrutiny: Defense spending and borrowing can be subjects of public and media scrutiny, especially concerning value for money, allegations of corruption, or strategic alignment.
      o Audits: Loan utilization and project implementation are subject to government audits to ensure accountability.
      -----------------
      2. Recent Examples and Trends:
      • Scorpene Submarines (France): The acquisition of two Scorpene-class submarines from France in the early 2000s involved significant financing arrangements, reportedly including a mix of commercial loans and possibly G2G support. This deal, however, became controversial due to corruption allegations, though investigations cleared Malaydeshn officials.
      • Littoral Combat Ships (LCS): The ongoing LCS project has faced severe delays and cost overruns. While not purely a loan issue, the financing structure and payment schedules have been central to the project's difficulties, highlighting the complexities of managing large defense contracts.
      • Future Acquisitions: Malaydesh is looking to modernize its air force (e.g., FA-50 light combat aircraft from Korea) and naval assets. These future acquisitions will undoubtedly involve various financing strategies, potentially including G2G loans, ECA support, and commercial borrowing, tailored to each specific deal.
      Challenges and Considerations:
      • Debt Burden: Excessive borrowing for defense can strain national finances, especially if economic growth slows.
      • Currency Fluctuations: Loans denominated in foreign currencies expose Malaydesh to exchange rate risks.
      • Cost Overruns: Large projects are prone to cost overruns, which can increase the overall debt burden beyond initial projections.
      • Maintenance and Lifecycle Costs: Beyond the initial purchase, the long-term maintenance, training, and operational costs of defense assets are substantial and must be factored into financial planning.

      Hapus
    6. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      LOAN-BASED DEFENSE PROCUREMENT: A STRATEGIC FINANCIAL MODEL
      🔹 Why Loans Are Used
      Malaydesh’s annual defense budget is limited and must cover personnel, operations, maintenance, and development. When major acquisitions—such as submarines, fighter jets, or armored vehicles—exceed available funds, the government turns to loan agreements to:
      • Spread payments over multiple years.
      • Avoid sudden budget shocks.
      • Enable long-term modernization without compromising operational readiness.
      -----------------
      🔸 Sources of Loans
      Source Type Description
      Foreign Governments Bilateral defense deals often include soft loans or export credits. Example: Poland for PT-91M tanks.
      Export Credit Agencies Institutions like Korea Eximbank or France’s Coface offer financing tied to defense exports.
      International Banks Commercial banks may offer syndicated loans for large naval or aerospace projects.
      Domestic Institutions Malaydeshn banks or government-linked investment entities may co-finance local components.
      -----------------
      🔸 Structure of Loan Agreements
      Component Details
      Tenor Typically 5–15 years depending on asset lifespan and delivery schedule.
      Grace Period Often 1–3 years during manufacturing phase before repayment begins.
      Interest Rate Negotiated based on bilateral ties; may be fixed or floating.
      Repayment Terms Milestone-based: payments tied to delivery, testing, or commissioning.
      Currency Usually USD or EUR; hedging used to manage forex risk.
      Guarantees Sovereign guarantees or performance bonds to secure repayment.
      -----------------
      🔸 Offset & Industrial Participation
      Loan-based deals often include offset clauses, which benefit Malaydesh’s local defense industry:
      • Technology Transfer: Training, simulators, or assembly know-how.
      • Local Manufacturing: Involvement of Boustead Naval Shipyard, SME Ordnance, or AIROD.
      • Maintenance Contracts: Long-term MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul) agreements with Malaydeshn firms.
      -----------------
      🔸 Examples of Loan-Based Defense Deals
      Program Supplier Country Loan Type & Offset
      Scorpene Submarines France Export credit + training + infrastructure development
      PT-91M Tanks Poland Bilateral loan + crew training + spare parts support
      FA-50M Fighter Jets South Korea Export credit + pilot training + simulator systems
      NGPV Patrol Vessels Germany Structured financing + local shipbuilding capacity
      ⚠️ Risks & Safeguards
      Risk Mitigation Strategy
      Exchange Rate Volatility Use of currency hedging and multi-currency reserves.
      Delivery Delays Penalty clauses and performance guarantees in contract.
      Budget Overruns Parliamentary oversight and audit mechanisms.
      Political Sensitivity Transparency initiatives and public reporting (e.g., LCS scandal).

      Hapus
    7. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      -
      2005: Prank China (KS-1A)
      Najib Razak menyatakan Malaydesh setuju secara prinsip membeli rudal jarak menengah KS-1A dari China dengan imbalan transfer teknologi. Hasil: Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga saat ini.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Malaydesh dilaporkan mempersempit pilihan ke Dassault Rafale untuk pengadaan 18 jet tempur senilai USD 2 miliar. Hasil: Proyek ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) di DSA 2016 untuk 20 unit artileri Caesar 155mm. Hasil: Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; Malaydesh akhirnya memilih unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      “The MALAYDESH government has shown interest in buying the JF-17 Thunder aircraft from Pakistan but the deal is yet to be finalized,” a senior Pakistan Ministry of Defense Production official told Arab News. Hasil: Malaydesh tiada akusisi jet tersebut.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim bahwa kontrak kapal MRSS akan ditandatangani Agustus 2018. Hasil: Hingga saat ini, kontrak tersebut tidak pernah terealisasi dengan PT PAL.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Malaydesh mengidentifikasi Tejas sebagai kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut. Hasil: Malaydesh justru memilih FA-50 Block 20 dari Korea Selatan pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Kemenhan Malaydesh meninjau ulang rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm setelah sebelumnya dikabarkan akan dibeli. Hasil: Dibatalkan/diganti dengan sistem lain.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Malaydesh diharapkan menyelesaikan kesepakatan untuk pasokan EVA 155mm. Hasil: Senasib dengan Yavuz, tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      =
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Sembilan kendaraan IAG Guardian yang dikirim untuk misi PBB (UNIFIL) dinyatakan tidak memenuhi persyaratan operasional, berujung pada sanksi pemotongan biaya operasional.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Black Hawk
      Ini menjadi salah satu "prank" terbesar baru-baru ini. Malaydesh berencana menyewa empat helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari perusahaan lokal Aerotree Defence & Services untuk menggantikan helikopter Nuri yang sudah tua.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Kuwait - Jet Tempur F/A-18 Hornet
      Malaydesh menunjukkan ketertarikan kuat untuk membeli jet tempur F/A-18 Hornet bekas milik Angkatan Udara Kuwait untuk menambah kekuatan udara mereka secara instan.
      -.
      2026 Pembekuan Pengadaan Massal
      Kejadian: Pada awal 2026, PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan semua keputusan pengadaan militer karena adanya penyelidikan dugaan korupsi dan kartel dalam kementerian pertahanan. Ini berdampak pada rencana-rencana yang sedang dibahas sepanjang 2024 dan 2025.
      ---------------
      SUBSIDI = HUTANG LUAR NEGERI
      📌 1. Subsidi Besar Membebani Anggaran
      Malaydesh memiliki subsidi energi, pangan, dan transportasi yang cukup besar
      Ketika harga minyak dunia naik atau inflasi meningkat, beban subsidi melonjak.
      Akibatnya, belanja pemerintah lebih tinggi daripada penerimaan pajak dan non-pajak, sehingga timbul defisit fiskal.
      📌 2. Dampak Ekonomi
      Negatif:
      Menambah beban utang luar negeri.
      Membuat Malaydesh lebih sensitif terhadap suku bunga global dan nilai tukar.
      Jika defisit terus melebar, risiko fiskal meningkat.
      📊 Alur Sederhana
      Subsidi besar → Defisit fiskal melebar → Pemerintah butuh dana → Penerbitan obligasi internasional → Dana masuk untuk menutup defisit & menjaga subsidi.
      Singkatnya, subsidi besar memperlebar defisit fiskal Malaydesh, dan untuk menutup kekurangan itu pemerintah menerbitkan obligasi internasional sebagai sumber pembiayaan eksternal

      Hapus
  21. 1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
    1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
    Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
    -
    MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
    2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
    3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
    4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
    5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
    2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
    4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
    ---------------------------------
    HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
    -
    SUMBER :
    Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
    --------------------------------_
    Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
    2010: 150 miliar USD
    2011: 165 miliar USD
    2012: 180 miliar USD
    2013: 195 miliar USD
    2014: 210 miliar USD
    2015: 225 miliar USD
    2016: 240 miliar USD
    2017: 255 miliar USD
    2018: 270 miliar USD
    2019: 285 miliar USD
    2020: 300 miliar USD
    2021: 315 miliar USD
    2022: 330 miliar USD
    2023: 345 miliar USD
    2024: 360 miliar USD
    2025: 375 miliar USD
    -
    SUMBER :
    BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
    Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
    2010 = 52.4
    2011 = 51.8
    2012 = 53.3
    2013 = 54.7
    2014 = 55.0
    2015 = 55.1
    2016 = 52.7
    2017 = 51.9
    2018 = 52.5
    2019 = 52.4
    2020 = 62.0
    2021 = 63.3
    2022 = 60.2
    2023 = 64.3
    2024 = 70.4
    2025 = 69.0
    -
    SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
    2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
    2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
    2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
    2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
    2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
    2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
    2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
    2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
    2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
    2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
    2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
    2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
    2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
    2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
    -
    SUMBER:
    IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

    BalasHapus
  22. Haaaaaaaaaa...,...😝🤣😀
    -
    1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
    1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
    Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
    -
    MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
    Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
    Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
    --------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
    2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
    3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
    4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
    5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
    8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
    1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
    2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
    4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
    5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
    6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
    7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
    8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
    9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
    10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
    11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
    ---------------------------------
    HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
    2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
    2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
    2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
    2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
    2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
    2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
    2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
    2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
    2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
    2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
    2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
    2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
    2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
    2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
    2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
    2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
    2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
    -
    SUMBER :
    Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
    --------------------------------_
    Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
    2010: 150 miliar USD
    2011: 165 miliar USD
    2012: 180 miliar USD
    2013: 195 miliar USD
    2014: 210 miliar USD
    2015: 225 miliar USD
    2016: 240 miliar USD
    2017: 255 miliar USD
    2018: 270 miliar USD
    2019: 285 miliar USD
    2020: 300 miliar USD
    2021: 315 miliar USD
    2022: 330 miliar USD
    2023: 345 miliar USD
    2024: 360 miliar USD
    2025: 375 miliar USD
    -
    SUMBER :
    BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
    Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
    2010 = 52.4
    2011 = 51.8
    2012 = 53.3
    2013 = 54.7
    2014 = 55.0
    2015 = 55.1
    2016 = 52.7
    2017 = 51.9
    2018 = 52.5
    2019 = 52.4
    2020 = 62.0
    2021 = 63.3
    2022 = 60.2
    2023 = 64.3
    2024 = 70.4
    2025 = 69.0
    -
    SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
    --------------------------------
    DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
    2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
    2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
    2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
    2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
    2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
    2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
    2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
    2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
    2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
    2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
    2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
    2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
    2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
    2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
    2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
    -
    SUMBER:
    IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

    BalasHapus

  23. Ayuh saya mau lihat selama mana BBM nya murah.... 🔥🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣🤣



    APBN diprediksi hanya mampu menahan kenaikan BBM 'dalam hitungan minggu'

    https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c3r39z20j42o

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. Haaaaaaaaaa...,...😝🤣😀
      -
      1 KOTA VS 1 NEGARA
      1 NEGARA VS 1 NEGARA
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN JAKARTA vs MALAYDESH :
      Jakarta GDP PPP : US$ 1,7 Triliun
      -
      MALAYDESH GDP PPP : US$ 1,34 Triliun
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB PPP (DAYA BELI RIIL) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Vietnam $1,89 T : 3,01x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Filipina $1,87 T : 3,04x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Thailand $1,85 T : 3,07x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Malaydesh $1,34 T : 4,24x lebih besar
      Indonesia $5,69 T vs Singapura $0,85 T : 6,69x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN PDB NOMINAL (NILAI PASAR) = SUMBER : IMF DAN WORLDBANK
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Thailand $0,58 T : 2,91x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Singapura $0,53 T : 3,18x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Filipina $0,51 T : 3,31x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Vietnam $0,49 T : 3,44x lebih besar
      Indonesia $1,69 T vs Malaydesh $0,46 T : 3,67x lebih besar
      --------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. Thailand 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. Vietnam 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. Laos 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. Myanmar 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
      1. Singapura 🇸🇬: 176,3%
      2. Laos 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
      3. Malaydesh 🇲🇾: 70,5%
      4. Thailand 🇹🇭: 62,2%
      5. Myanmar 🇲🇲: 63,0%
      6. Filipina 🇵🇭: 58,8%
      7. Indonesia 🇮🇩: 41,1%
      8. Vietnam 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
      9. Kamboja 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
      10. Timor Leste 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
      11. Brunei 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
      ---------------------------------
      HUTANG & LIABILITAS MALAYDESH 2010–2026
      2010: RM 407,1 Miliar
      2011: RM 456,1 Miliar
      2012: RM 501,6 Miliar
      2013: RM 547,7 Miliar
      2014: RM 582,8 Miliar
      2015: RM 630,5 Miliar
      2016: RM 648,5 Miliar
      2017: RM 686,8 Miliar
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      -
      SUMBER :
      Bloomberg & Reuters | CNA & The Star | The Edge Malaydesh | MOF & Bernama | Kementerian Kewangan
      --------------------------------_
      Hutang Pemerintah Malaydesh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2025 dalam USD miliar.
      2010: 150 miliar USD
      2011: 165 miliar USD
      2012: 180 miliar USD
      2013: 195 miliar USD
      2014: 210 miliar USD
      2015: 225 miliar USD
      2016: 240 miliar USD
      2017: 255 miliar USD
      2018: 270 miliar USD
      2019: 285 miliar USD
      2020: 300 miliar USD
      2021: 315 miliar USD
      2022: 330 miliar USD
      2023: 345 miliar USD
      2024: 360 miliar USD
      2025: 375 miliar USD
      -
      SUMBER :
      BNM | MOF | Statista/Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      Rasio Utang terhadap GDP Malaydesh (2010–2025)
      Tahun Rasio Utang terhadap GDP (%)
      2010 = 52.4
      2011 = 51.8
      2012 = 53.3
      2013 = 54.7
      2014 = 55.0
      2015 = 55.1
      2016 = 52.7
      2017 = 51.9
      2018 = 52.5
      2019 = 52.4
      2020 = 62.0
      2021 = 63.3
      2022 = 60.2
      2023 = 64.3
      2024 = 70.4
      2025 = 69.0
      -
      SUMBER : Macrotrends / World Bank / Statista / Trading Economics
      --------------------------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL MALAYDESH PERIODE 2010–2025:
      2010: -5.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2011: -4.7% (± USD 14.0 MILIAR)
      2012: -4.3% (± USD 13.5 MILIAR)
      2013: -3.8% (± USD 12.2 MILIAR)
      2014: -3.4% (± USD 11.5 MILIAR)
      2015: -3.2% (± USD 9.6 MILIAR)
      2016: -3.1% (± USD 9.3 MILIAR)
      2017: -2.9% (± USD 9.2 MILIAR)
      2018: -3.7% (± USD 13.2 MILIAR)
      2019: -3.4% (± USD 12.4 MILIAR)
      2020: -6.2% (± USD 20.9 MILIAR)
      2021: -6.4% (± USD 23.9 MILIAR)
      2022: -5.5% (± USD 22.4 MILIAR)
      2023: -5.0% (± USD 20.0 MILIAR)
      2024: -4.3% (± USD 18.1 MILIAR)
      2025: -3.8% (± USD 17.8 MILIAR)
      -
      SUMBER:
      IMF | World Economic Outlook | World Bank | Bank Negara Malaydesh.

      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      Malaydesh's defense procurement, like that of many nations, often involves significant financial arrangements, including loans. Here's a detailed breakdown of how loans typically factor into Malaydesh's defense spending:
      1. The Need for Loans in Defense Procurement:
      • High Costs: Modern military equipment (fighter jets, warships, submarines, advanced weaponry, radar systems) is incredibly expensive. A single major platform can cost hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars.
      • Budgetary Constraints: Even with a dedicated defense budget, it's rare for a nation to have enough readily available cash to make outright purchases of all desired equipment, especially for large-scale modernization programs.
      • Strategic Importance: Defense capabilities are crucial for national security, sovereignty, and regional stability. Delays in procurement due to lack of immediate funds can have serious strategic implications.
      • Long-Term Investments: Military assets have long operational lifespans, often decades. Financing them over a longer period through loans aligns with the long-term utility of the assets.
      -----------------
      2. Types of Loans and Financing Mechanisms:
      • Government-to-Government (G2G) Loans:
      o Description: These are loans provided directly by the government of the exporting country to the Malaydeshn government. They often come with favorable terms (lower interest rates, longer repayment periods) as they are part of broader bilateral defense cooperation agreements.
      o Example: A country like France or Germany might offer a G2G loan to Malaydesh to facilitate the purchase of their defense industry's products.
      • Export Credit Agencies (ECAs):
      o Description: Many exporting nations have ECAs (e.g., France's Bpifrance, Germany's Euler Hermes, UK's UK Export Finance) that provide guarantees or direct loans to support their domestic industries' exports, including defense. These loans are usually attractive because they reduce risk for commercial banks and often have competitive terms.
      o Mechanism: The ECA might guarantee a loan from a commercial bank to Malaydesh, making it easier and cheaper for Malaydesh to borrow. Or, the ECA might provide direct financing.
      • Commercial Bank Loans/Syndicated Loans:
      o Description: Malaydesh can also secure loans from international commercial banks or consortia of banks (syndicated loans). These are typically market-rate loans, but for large defense projects, they can still be a viable option.
      o Considerations: Interest rates and terms will depend on Malaydesh's credit rating and prevailing market conditions.
      • Vendor Financing:
      o Description: Sometimes, the defense contractor itself (the vendor) or its associated financial arm might offer financing solutions to the buyer. This is less common for entire platforms but can occur for components or upgrades.
      • Leasing Agreements:
      o Description: While not strictly a "loan," leasing allows Malaydesh to use defense assets for a specified period by paying regular installments, without immediately owning them. This can be attractive for certain types of equipment or to manage budget cycles.

      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. SOURCES OF LOANS
      • Foreign Governments / Export Credit Agencies (ECAs):
      Example: when Malaydesh buys equipment from France, Germany, or South Korea, financing is often backed by the exporting country’s credit agency (e.g., COFACE in France, KEXIM in Korea).
      o These loans reduce the upfront burden but tie Malaydesh to the supplier’s country.
      • International Banks / Syndicated Loans:
      Commercial banks may finance large contracts, usually guaranteed by government sovereign commitments.
      • Domestic Financial Institutions:
      In some cases, Malaydesh uses state-owned banks or domestic bonds to raise funds for major defense projects.
      ________________________________________
      2. Loan Structures
      • Export Credit Facilities:
      Structured specifically for defense acquisitions, with repayment terms of 5–15 years.
      • Tied Loans / Buyer’s Credit:
      Funds must be spent on equipment or services from the lending country. This is common in deals with European or Asian suppliers.
      • Mixed Financing:
      A combination of loans + government budget allocations (often for training, infrastructure, or local offsets).
      • Grace Periods:
      Many defense loans have grace periods (e.g., 3–5 years before repayment starts), matching delivery and commissioning timelines.
      ________________________________________
      3. Why Malaydesh Uses Loans
      • Budget Constraints: Annual defense budget (about RM 15–20 billion in recent years) is too small for multi-billion ringgit projects like submarines, fighters, or frigates.
      • Modernization Goals: Loans allow simultaneous modernization (air, sea, land) instead of waiting decades.
      • Political Timing: Loans make it easier for governments to announce big procurements without overwhelming a single year’s budget.
      • Industry Development: Loans tied to offsets/technology transfers can support local shipyards (e.g., Boustead for LCS, local assembly of vehicles).
      ________________________________________
      4. Risks & Weaknesses
      • Debt Burden: Repayments commit future defense budgets, limiting flexibility.
      • Currency Risks: If loans are in USD/EUR, fluctuations in the ringgit increase costs.
      • Tied Procurement: Loans often force Malaydesh to buy from specific suppliers, limiting competition.
      • Cost Overruns: If a project is delayed (e.g., LCS), Malaydesh is repaying loans even before receiving the full capability.
      • Opaque Terms: Some loan agreements are not fully transparent to the public, raising concerns about governance.
      ________________________________________
      5. Examples in Malaydeshn Context
      • Scorpene Submarines (France): Financed partly through French bank loans + Malaydeshn government allocation.
      • LCS Program: Involves complex financing structures, including domestic borrowings to support Boustead Naval Shipyard.
      • FA-50M Fighter Jets (South Korea): Reports suggest possible involvement of export credit arrangements from KEXIM or Korean banks, though details aren’t fully disclosed.
      • PT-91M Tanks (Poland): Likely used export credit from Polish/European financial institutions at the time of purchase

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      -
      2005: Prank China (KS-1A)
      Najib Razak menyatakan Malaydesh setuju secara prinsip membeli rudal jarak menengah KS-1A dari China dengan imbalan transfer teknologi. Hasil: Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga saat ini.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Malaydesh dilaporkan mempersempit pilihan ke Dassault Rafale untuk pengadaan 18 jet tempur senilai USD 2 miliar. Hasil: Proyek ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) di DSA 2016 untuk 20 unit artileri Caesar 155mm. Hasil: Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; Malaydesh akhirnya memilih unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      “The MALAYDESH government has shown interest in buying the JF-17 Thunder aircraft from Pakistan but the deal is yet to be finalized,” a senior Pakistan Ministry of Defense Production official told Arab News. Hasil: Malaydesh tiada akusisi jet tersebut.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim bahwa kontrak kapal MRSS akan ditandatangani Agustus 2018. Hasil: Hingga saat ini, kontrak tersebut tidak pernah terealisasi dengan PT PAL.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Malaydesh mengidentifikasi Tejas sebagai kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut. Hasil: Malaydesh justru memilih FA-50 Block 20 dari Korea Selatan pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Kemenhan Malaydesh meninjau ulang rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm setelah sebelumnya dikabarkan akan dibeli. Hasil: Dibatalkan/diganti dengan sistem lain.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Malaydesh diharapkan menyelesaikan kesepakatan untuk pasokan EVA 155mm. Hasil: Senasib dengan Yavuz, tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      =
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Sembilan kendaraan IAG Guardian yang dikirim untuk misi PBB (UNIFIL) dinyatakan tidak memenuhi persyaratan operasional, berujung pada sanksi pemotongan biaya operasional.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Black Hawk
      Ini menjadi salah satu "prank" terbesar baru-baru ini. Malaydesh berencana menyewa empat helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari perusahaan lokal Aerotree Defence & Services untuk menggantikan helikopter Nuri yang sudah tua.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Kuwait - Jet Tempur F/A-18 Hornet
      Malaydesh menunjukkan ketertarikan kuat untuk membeli jet tempur F/A-18 Hornet bekas milik Angkatan Udara Kuwait untuk menambah kekuatan udara mereka secara instan.
      -.
      2026 Pembekuan Pengadaan Massal
      Kejadian: Pada awal 2026, PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan semua keputusan pengadaan militer karena adanya penyelidikan dugaan korupsi dan kartel dalam kementerian pertahanan. Ini berdampak pada rencana-rencana yang sedang dibahas sepanjang 2024 dan 2025.
      ---------------
      DEFISIT FISKAL SEJAK 1998
      DEFISIT FISKAL SEJAK 1998
      DEFISIT FISKAL SEJAK 1998
      📉 Apa itu Defisit Fiskal dan Kenapa 1998 Penting?
      Defisit fiskal berlaku apabila perbelanjaan kerajaan melebihi pendapatan. Malaydesh mula mengalami defisit berterusan sejak Krisis Kewangan Asia 1997–1998, yang menyebabkan:
      • Kejatuhan nilai ringgit dan pasaran saham.
      • Penurunan hasil kerajaan akibat kelembapan ekonomi.
      • Peningkatan perbelanjaan untuk pemulihan ekonomi dan sokongan sosial.
      Sejak itu, Malaydesh tidak pernah mencatatkan lebihan fiskal, dan defisit kekal menjadi ciri belanjawan tahunan.
      📊 Implikasi Defisit Berterusan
      • Beban hutang meningkat: Untuk menampung defisit, kerajaan perlu berhutang, menyebabkan nisbah hutang kepada KDNK meningkat.
      • Keterbatasan fiskal: Kurang ruang untuk belanja pembangunan, pendidikan, kesihatan, dan infrastruktur.
      • Risiko kepada generasi akan datang: Sultan Ibrahim mempersoalkan sama ada hutang ini akan diwariskan kepada generasi muda.

      Hapus
  24. Di tanggung Pertamina..? 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣



    Harga BBM Gak Naik, Purbaya: Pertamina Tanggung Sementara

    https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20260401151849-4-723236/harga-bbm-gak-naik-purbaya-pertamina-tanggung-sementara

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      1. Procurement and Equipment Weaknesses
      a. Delays in Procurement
      • Projects like the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) and New Generation Patrol Vessel (NGPV) programs have faced years of delays.
      • LCS project, valued at RM9 billion, has seen zero completed ships after massive spending.
      • Delays reduce operational readiness and compromise the Navy’s ability to safeguard maritime borders.
      b. Cost Overruns
      • Mismanagement and overbudgeting are common; e.g., the LCS project has overspent by over RM1.4 billion, partly to cover liabilities from past failed projects.
      • Cost overruns often stem from political interference, corruption, and poor project planning.
      c. Aging and Inadequate Equipment
      • Acquisition of decades-old Black Hawk helicopters drew royal criticism as "flying coffins."
      • Many MAF systems are obsolete, reducing combat effectiveness and increasing maintenance costs.
      ________________________________________
      2. Corruption and Cronyism
      • High-level officials and intermediaries often profit from military contracts (e.g., Scorpène submarine scandal).
      • Cronyism results in:
      o Contracts awarded without transparent tenders.
      o Selection of unsuitable or overpriced equipment.
      • This erodes public trust and inflates defense expenditure without improving capability.
      ________________________________________
      3. Lack of Transparency and Oversight
      • Official Secrets Act 1972 and limited parliamentary oversight create opaque decision-making.
      • Tender processes often bypass public scrutiny, enabling mismanagement and corruption.
      • Examples:
      o LCS project: partial shell companies used for siphoning funds.
      o Scorpène deal: commissions and possible bribery unaccounted for in official records.
      ________________________________________
      4. Human Resource and Training Challenges
      • Insufficient training and outdated doctrines reduce operational efficiency.
      • MAF faces difficulty retaining skilled personnel in technical fields (e.g., naval engineering, aviation maintenance).
      • Limited joint exercises with advanced foreign militaries reduce interoperability and experience.
      ________________________________________
      5. Strategic and Policy Weaknesses
      • Defence policy is sometimes reactive rather than proactive.
      • Limited domestic defense production capability leads to dependence on foreign suppliers, often exacerbating delays and cost overruns.
      • Politically driven procurement decisions may override strategic military needs.
      ________________________________________
      Conclusion
      The weaknesses of the Malaydesh n Armed Forces are interconnected, combining operational, financial, and governance shortcomings:
      1. Operational Readiness: Compromised by outdated and delayed equipment.
      2. Financial Mismanagement: Overspending and corruption reduce the value of defense budgets.
      3. Governance and Transparency Gaps: Lack of accountability allows systemic inefficiency.
      4. Human Capital Challenges: Training and retention issues impede force modernization.
      Implications:
      • National security is at risk, particularly in maritime defense and rapid-response operations.
      • Public funds are wasted without meaningful improvements in capability.

      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      Examples of Malaydeshn Procurement / Defense Asset Lawsuits or Legal Claims
      Case Parties / Claimant Issue / Cause of Suit Outcome / Status
      Black Hawk Helicopter Lease Aerotree Defence and Services Sdn Bhd (claimant) vs Government / Ministry of Defence / Secretary-General Aerotree leased four UH-60A Black Hawk helicopters (5-year lease). The government cancelled the lease, and Aerotree filed suit seeking compensation for damages from cancellation. Government says it had “clear grounds” to cancel (supplier failed to deliver even after extension). The lawsuit is in the High Court. Aerotree is seeking RM353 million in damages.
      Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Project – Subcontractors vs BHIC / Directors Contraves Advanced Devices Sdn Bhd (CAD) & Contraves Electrodynamics Sdn Bhd (CED) vs Boustead Heavy Industries Corp Bhd (BHIC), BHIC Defence Technologies, and certain directors (Salihin Abang, Syed Zahiruddin Putra Syed Osman) After LOAs (Letters of Award) for equipment/weaponry supply in the LCS project were terminated, the subcontractors claimed: that LOAs were still valid, sought payment of claimed outstanding amounts (around RM470.8 million), and alleged breach of fiduciary duties by the directors. In September 2025, the Kuala Lumpur High Court struck out the lawsuit: BHIC and its unit’s applications to strike out the suit were allowed; likewise the directors’ applications. CAD and CED’s claims were dismissed. Costs were ordered against CAD/CED and their CEO.
      Scorpene Submarine Deal – French Indictments / Civil Lawsuits Thales / DCN (France) & associated individuals vs Malaydeshn interests (or public / NGOs) Accusations of kickbacks / bribery in the 2002 Scorpene submarine deal: specifically allegations that in the financing or “support service” contract, funds were misused, or that commissions were paid improperly to intermediaries linked to Malaydeshn political persons. NGOs like Suaram filed complaints; French courts have indicted some individuals. Investigations are ongoing or have been reopened. Some indictments in France; however, full outcomes / accountability in Malaydesh have been contentious and politically sensitive.
      ________________________________________
      Insights / Observations from These Cases
      • Many of the lawsuits or claims revolve around contract cancellation, non-delivery, termination of sub-contracts, or non-payment for services or parts.
      • A recurring theme is cost overruns / delays in delivery (especially in large naval shipbuilding or vessel projects).
      • Another common claim is misconduct, misuse of funds, or alleged corruption / bribery associated with procurement deals.
      • The government often responds by citing breach of contract by the private company (e.g. supplier failure to deliver or meet obligations).
      • Many suits are either struck out, settled, or remain pending, often complicated by political, legal, or evidentiary issues.


      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      LOAN-BASED PROCUREMENT IN MALAYDESH’S MILITARY
      Malaydesh often uses loan agreements to finance large-scale defense acquisitions, especially when the cost exceeds annual defense budgets. These loans can be sourced from foreign governments, international banks, or domestic financial institutions, and are structured to support long-term modernization goals.
      🔑 Key Features of Loan Procurement
      Feature Description
      Source of Loan Foreign governments (e.g., Poland, France, Korea), export credit agencies, or domestic banks.
      Tenor & Terms Typically 5–15 years, with grace periods and interest rates negotiated based on bilateral ties.
      Repayment Structure Paid in installments tied to delivery milestones or operational readiness.
      Currency Often denominated in USD, EUR, or local currency depending on supplier.
      Guarantees May involve sovereign guarantees or performance bonds.
      Offset Clauses Includes industrial participation, technology transfer, or local assembly.
      🛡️ Examples of Loan-Based Military Procurement
      1. Scorpene Submarines (France)
      • Loan Type: Foreign loan via French financial institutions.
      • Value: RM3.4 billion.
      • Offset: Training, infrastructure, and technology transfer to Boustead Naval Shipyard.
      2. PT-91M Pendekar Tanks (Poland)
      • Loan Type: Bilateral loan agreement with Poland.
      • Value: USD 370 million.
      • Offset: Crew training and maintenance support.
      3. FA-50M Fighter Jets (South Korea)
      • Loan Type: Export credit facility from Korean financial institutions.
      • Value: RM4.08 billion.
      • Offset: Pilot training, simulator systems, and potential local maintenance hub.
      4. NGPV Patrol Vessels (Germany)
      • Loan Type: Structured financing with German partners.
      • Value: RM5.35 billion.
      • Offset: Local shipbuilding capacity and technology transfer.
      -------------------
      FA-50M FIGHTER JET PROCUREMENT: FINANCIAL BREAKDOWN
      🔹 Overview
      • Contract Value: USD 920 million (≈ RM4.08 billion)
      • Quantity: 18 FA-50M Block 20 light combat aircraft
      • Supplier: Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI)
      • Contract Signed: May 2023 at LIMA (Langkawi International Maritime and Aerospace Exhibition)
      • Delivery Timeline: First batch expected in 20262
      💰 Financial Structure
      Component Description
      Loan Source Export credit facility from South Korean financial institutions, likely backed by KEXIM (Korea Export-Import Bank).
      Loan Type Government-to-government structured loan with sovereign guarantee.
      Tenor Estimated 10–15 years, with grace period during manufacturing phase.
      Interest Rate Preferential rate negotiated under bilateral defense cooperation.
      Repayment Schedule Milestone-based: tied to aircraft delivery and acceptance testing.
      Currency USD-denominated, with hedging options to mitigate forex risk.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ________________________________________
      MALAYDESH UP TO =
      DEBT 97% OF GDP
      DEBT 97% OF GDP
      DEBT 97% OF GDP
      Malaydesh's debt ratio could surge to almost 97% of GDP if government-linked guarantees materialize, a risk highlighted in the Ministry of Finance's (MOF) Fiscal Outlook 2026 report, although baseline projections show a gradual improvement in the debt trajectory. The report indicates that a "contingent-liability shock" from guarantees or other off-budget obligations could push the ratio significantly higher, amplifying debt-scarring effects.
      • Baseline projections:
      The MOF's baseline outlook projects a gradual improvement in the country's debt trajectory, with the government debt-to-GDP ratio expected to remain steady around 63.5% through 2026.
      • Stress test results:
      In a stress scenario, the debt-to-GDP ratio could reach 96.7% in 2027 if government guarantees materialize.
      • Risks:
      This surge reflects the "debt-scarring effect of additional borrowings to fulfil these obligations". A combined macroeconomic and fiscal shock, similar to the pandemic period, could raise the debt ratio to approximately 88% of GDP.
      • Government response:
      The MOF emphasizes that these stress tests underscore the importance of strengthening fiscal discipline and debt management to contain these risks and maintain debt sustainability

      Hapus
  25. BBM KING INDO TETAP STABIL BEDA SAMA MALONDESH KISMIN KASTA DALIT SUBSIDI BBM NAIK PARAH RAKYAT MENJERIT KONON RINGGIT BERJAYA TERNYATA BANGLA YANG BERJAYA 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    BalasHapus
  26. APBN makin defisit.... Malah Pertamina di suruh tanggung BEBAN Subsidi BBM..? 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣



    Harga BBM Gak Naik, Purbaya: Pertamina Tanggung Sementara

    https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20260401151849-4-723236/harga-bbm-gak-naik-purbaya-pertamina-tanggung-sementara

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      1. Overview
      Malaydesh armed forces, Angkatan Tentera Malaydesh (ATM), operate under limited budgets. Over the decades, this has led to prolonged use of older military equipment and delays in modernizing their forces. These challenges impact operational readiness, capabilities, and strategic deterrence.
      ________________________________________
      2. Ageing Equipment
      “Ageing equipment” refers to military hardware that has outlived its intended operational lifespan or requires extensive maintenance to remain functional.
      Examples in Malaydesh :
      1. Air Force (TUDM / Tentera Udara Diraja Malaydesh )
      o MiG-29s and F-5E Tiger IIs: Some aircraft are over 30 years old.
      o Maintenance costs increase with age, and spare parts become harder to source.
      o Operational readiness is reduced; fewer aircraft are available for exercises or patrols.
      2. Navy (TLDM / Tentera Laut Diraja Malaydesh )
      o Kasturi-class frigates and older Perdana-class patrol vessels are decades old.
      o Ships need constant upkeep; older vessels have limited combat capabilities compared to modern ships.
      3. Army (TDM / Tentera Darat Malaydesh )
      o Condor armored vehicles and old artillery systems are still in service.
      o Modern threats like asymmetric warfare or rapid deployment require more advanced, mobile systems.
      Consequences of Ageing Equipment
      • Higher maintenance costs: More resources go into keeping old hardware operational.
      • Reduced combat effectiveness: Outdated technology may be inferior to neighboring militaries’ systems.
      • Operational limitations: Older platforms may be slower, less reliable, or incompatible with modern communication and weapon systems.
      ________________________________________
      3. Delayed Modernization
      “Delayed modernization” occurs when planned upgrades or new acquisitions are postponed, usually due to budget constraints, bureaucratic issues, or changing priorities.
      Examples in Malaydesh :
      1. Air Force
      o Replacement of aging fighters like MiG-29s and F-5E has been delayed.
      o New acquisitions like the Su-30MKM and M346 trainers are fewer than initially planned.
      2. Navy
      o Plans for new frigates, submarines, and multi-role combat ships are often slow-moving or downscaled.
      o Patrol vessels are prioritized over high-end warships due to cost constraints.
      3. Army
      o Modern armored vehicles and artillery acquisition programs face delays, affecting mobility and firepower.
      o Emphasis is placed on upgrading existing equipment rather than full-scale replacement.
      Causes of Delayed Modernization
      • Limited defense budget: Malaydesh allocates ~1.5–2% of GDP to defense. High-cost projects compete with other national priorities.
      • Procurement bureaucracy: Complex procurement processes slow down acquisition.
      • Foreign dependence: Reliance on imported equipment leads to delays in deliveries.
      • Strategic threat assessment: Malaydesh relatively low external threat level reduces urgency for rapid modernization.
      ________________________________________
      4. Impacts
      1. Operational Readiness
      o Fewer active platforms are available due to maintenance of old systems.
      2. Capability Gap
      o Aging systems may lack advanced radar, missile systems, or networked command capabilities.
      3. Regional Competitiveness
      o Malaydesh may lag behind neighbors like Singapore or Thailand in modern warfare technology.
      4. Financial Burden
      o Continuous repair and patching of old equipment may ultimately cost more than timely modernization.

      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      1. Overview
      Malaydesh armed forces, Angkatan Tentera Malaydesh (ATM), operate under limited budgets. Over the decades, this has led to prolonged use of older military equipment and delays in modernizing their forces. These challenges impact operational readiness, capabilities, and strategic deterrence.
      ________________________________________
      2. Ageing Equipment
      “Ageing equipment” refers to military hardware that has outlived its intended operational lifespan or requires extensive maintenance to remain functional.
      Examples in Malaydesh :
      1. Air Force (TUDM / Tentera Udara Diraja Malaydesh )
      o MiG-29s and F-5E Tiger IIs: Some aircraft are over 30 years old.
      o Maintenance costs increase with age, and spare parts become harder to source.
      o Operational readiness is reduced; fewer aircraft are available for exercises or patrols.
      2. Navy (TLDM / Tentera Laut Diraja Malaydesh )
      o Kasturi-class frigates and older Perdana-class patrol vessels are decades old.
      o Ships need constant upkeep; older vessels have limited combat capabilities compared to modern ships.
      3. Army (TDM / Tentera Darat Malaydesh )
      o Condor armored vehicles and old artillery systems are still in service.
      o Modern threats like asymmetric warfare or rapid deployment require more advanced, mobile systems.
      Consequences of Ageing Equipment
      • Higher maintenance costs: More resources go into keeping old hardware operational.
      • Reduced combat effectiveness: Outdated technology may be inferior to neighboring militaries’ systems.
      • Operational limitations: Older platforms may be slower, less reliable, or incompatible with modern communication and weapon systems.
      ________________________________________
      3. Delayed Modernization
      “Delayed modernization” occurs when planned upgrades or new acquisitions are postponed, usually due to budget constraints, bureaucratic issues, or changing priorities.
      Examples in Malaydesh :
      1. Air Force
      o Replacement of aging fighters like MiG-29s and F-5E has been delayed.
      o New acquisitions like the Su-30MKM and M346 trainers are fewer than initially planned.
      2. Navy
      o Plans for new frigates, submarines, and multi-role combat ships are often slow-moving or downscaled.
      o Patrol vessels are prioritized over high-end warships due to cost constraints.
      3. Army
      o Modern armored vehicles and artillery acquisition programs face delays, affecting mobility and firepower.
      o Emphasis is placed on upgrading existing equipment rather than full-scale replacement.
      Causes of Delayed Modernization
      • Limited defense budget: Malaydesh allocates ~1.5–2% of GDP to defense. High-cost projects compete with other national priorities.
      • Procurement bureaucracy: Complex procurement processes slow down acquisition.
      • Foreign dependence: Reliance on imported equipment leads to delays in deliveries.
      • Strategic threat assessment: Malaydesh relatively low external threat level reduces urgency for rapid modernization.
      ________________________________________
      4. Impacts
      1. Operational Readiness
      o Fewer active platforms are available due to maintenance of old systems.
      2. Capability Gap
      o Aging systems may lack advanced radar, missile systems, or networked command capabilities.
      3. Regional Competitiveness
      o Malaydesh may lag behind neighbors like Singapore or Thailand in modern warfare technology.
      4. Financial Burden
      o Continuous repair and patching of old equipment may ultimately cost more than timely modernization.

      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      1. Limited Defense Budget Allocation
      Malaydesh historically allocates a relatively modest portion of its national budget to defense. While exact figures vary yearly, defense spending generally hovers around 1.2%–1.5% of GDP, which is lower than many neighboring countries in Southeast Asia. This limited allocation constrains the military’s ability to fund:
      • Procurement of advanced weapons systems
      • Research and development (R&D)
      • Infrastructure maintenance and upgrades
      • Personnel training and welfare
      ________________________________________
      2. High Operational Costs vs. Budget
      Even with a modest defense budget, a significant portion goes toward salaries, pensions, and day-to-day operations, leaving limited funds for modernization programs. For instance:
      • Military personnel costs (salaries, benefits, retirement pay) consume a large share of the budget.
      • Routine operational expenses such as fuel, maintenance, and logistics reduce available funds for new equipment.
      This means that Malaydesh often faces trade-offs between maintaining existing forces and acquiring new capabilities.
      ________________________________________
      3. Competition with Domestic Priorities
      Malaydesh faces multiple domestic financial priorities, including:
      • Education and healthcare
      • Infrastructure development
      • Social welfare programs
      These competing priorities make it politically and economically difficult to significantly increase defense spending, even when modernization is needed.
      ________________________________________
      4. Dependency on Foreign Technology
      Malaydesh relies heavily on foreign suppliers for advanced military hardware, which is expensive. Limited financial resources make it challenging to:
      • Procure large quantities of modern equipment
      • Maintain sophisticated systems
      • Engage in long-term defense research or develop indigenous capabilities
      As a result, Malaydesh often acquires second-hand equipment or delays procurement programs.
      ________________________________________
      5. Impact on Modernization and Strategic Readiness
      The financial constraints directly influence Malaydesh ’s military readiness:
      • Aging Equipment: Existing platforms (ships, aircraft, and vehicles) are kept operational beyond their intended lifespan due to budget constraints.
      • Delayed Modernization: Planned acquisitions, such as advanced fighter jets, naval vessels, or air defense systems, are often postponed.
      • Limited Training and Exercises: Reduced funds for joint exercises, international cooperation, and troop training can affect operational effectiveness.
      ________________________________________
      6. Political and Economic Uncertainties
      Fluctuating oil revenues, global economic conditions, and political changes affect budget allocations. Defense funding is often reactive rather than strategic, meaning modernization projects may stall if economic growth slows or budget priorities shift.
      ________________________________________
      Summary:
      Financial limitations in Malaydesh ’s military are primarily caused by modest defense budget allocations, high operational costs, competing domestic priorities, reliance on costly foreign technology, and economic/political uncertainties. These factors collectively constrain modernization, maintenance, and strategic readiness, leaving the armed forces with aging equipment and delayed capability development.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      💰 1. Chronic Budget Constraints
      • Malaydesh defense budget has remained stagnant or modest relative to its strategic needs. Successive governments have been unwilling to reallocate funds from other sectors or reduce manpower to prioritize modernization.
      • For example, the Army is still awaiting Finance Ministry approval for the procurement of 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV), despite urgent operational requirements.
      Result: Procurement plans are delayed or scaled down, leaving aging platforms in service well past their intended lifespan.
      🧱 2. Procurement Mismanagement & Delays
      • The Auditor-General’s 2025 report flagged RM7.8 billion in armoured vehicle contracts plagued by:
      o Delayed deliveries (e.g., 68 GEMPITA units delivered late)
      o Full payments made despite contract breaches
      o Weak enforcement of penalties (RM162.75 million fine claimed two years late)3
      • Maintenance and spare parts for key assets like ADNAN and PENDEKAR were also delayed, with fines left uncollected.
      Result: Even when acquisitions are approved, execution is inefficient and accountability is weak.
      🕴️ 3. Middlemen & Non-Transparent Deal Structures
      • Defense procurement is often conducted via limited tenders or single-source contracts, with fewer than one-third awarded through open competition.
      • Politically connected firms—often led by retired military officers—dominate the landscape, inflating costs and reducing transparency.
      • The King of Malaydesh recently rebuked the Defence Ministry for relying on “agents” and “salesmen,” calling out inflated prices and the attempted purchase of 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which he likened to “flying coffins”.
      Result: Corruption risks and inflated pricing erode trust and reduce the effectiveness of spending.
      🧓 4. Aging Inventory & No Replacement Strategy
      • As of late 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Air Force, and Navy were over 30 years old.
      • Yet, there is no clear roadmap for phased replacement or recapitalization, and ad hoc purchases continue to dominate.
      Result: Operational readiness suffers, and Malaydesh risks capability gaps in key domains like air defense, maritime patrol, and armored mobility.
      📊 Summary Table: Why Malaydesh Struggles to Acquire Military Assets
      Factor Description Impact
      Budget limitations Low prioritization of defense in national spending Delayed or cancelled acquisitions
      Procurement mismanagement Poor contract enforcement, late deliveries Waste of funds, reduced readiness
      Middlemen & opaque deals Politically connected firms inflate costs Corruption risk, poor value
      Aging inventory No structured replacement plan Capability gaps, low deterrence

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      Key Implications and Risks
      1. Long-Term Debt Obligations:
      o Accumulation: Each major acquisition adds to the national debt. While spreading costs, it means a significant portion of future budgets is earmarked for debt servicing (principal and interest payments) rather than other development or operational needs.
      o Sustainability: The long-term sustainability of this debt depends on Malaydesh's economic growth and its ability to generate sufficient revenue.
      -----------------
      2. Currency Risks:
      o Exchange Rate Fluctuations: This is perhaps the most significant financial risk for foreign-denominated loans. A weakening Ringgit can dramatically increase the real cost of debt repayment. For example, if Malaydesh borrowed €1 billion for submarines and the Ringgit depreciates by 10% against the Euro, the cost in Ringgit terms effectively increases by 10% overnight.
      o Mitigation: Governments can use currency hedging strategies (e.g., forward contracts) to mitigate this risk, but these also come with costs.
      -----------------
      3. Vulnerability to Project Delays:
      o Escalating Costs: Large defense projects are notoriously prone to delays due to technical complexities, design changes, political issues, or contractual disputes. Delays mean that interest payments continue accumulating even before the asset is delivered or operational, pushing up the total cost.
      o Opportunity Cost: The funds tied up in a delayed project cannot be used for other urgent defense needs or national priorities.
      o Operational Readiness Impact: Delays in receiving crucial equipment can impact the readiness and capabilities of the armed forces, potentially leaving capability gaps.
      o Maintenance and Spares: The lifecycle cost of defense equipment is often several times its initial purchase price, with ongoing expenses for maintenance, upgrades, and spare parts also requiring substantial funding.
      -----------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
      • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
      Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
      • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang

      Hapus
  27. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    -
    INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
    GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 2,9%
    GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
    =============
    =============
    MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
    GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 3,8%
    GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
    5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
    -
    1. Overview of Malaydesh ’s Military Budget
    Malaydesh ’s armed forces are collectively called Angkatan Tentera Malaydesh (ATM), which includes:
    • Tentera Darat (Army)
    • Tentera Laut (Navy)
    • Tentera Udara (Air Force)
    The military budget comes from the national budget, which is approved annually by the government. Historically, Malaydesh allocates around 1.5% to 2% of its GDP to defense, which is lower than regional neighbors like Singapore (~3% of GDP) or Thailand (~2.5% of GDP).
    ________________________________________
    2. Reasons for Budgetary Constraints
    Several factors contribute to limits on Malaydesh ’s military spending:
    1. Economic Priorities
    o Malaydesh has competing priorities like infrastructure, healthcare, education, and social programs.
    o Defense often has to share funding with these critical sectors, especially during economic slowdowns or crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
    2. Low GDP Proportion Allocation
    o Defense spending is not a large share of GDP, meaning ATM must operate efficiently with limited resources.
    3. Cost of Modernization
    o Modern weapons systems (jets, naval ships, missile defense) are very expensive.
    o Limited budgets often force Malaydesh to prioritize maintenance over new acquisitions.
    4. Debt and Fiscal Policy Constraints
    o The government manages national debt levels and budget deficits, which restricts discretionary spending, including military upgrades.
    5. Regional Security Assessment
    o Malaydesh generally faces lower direct military threats compared to neighbors like the Philippines or Singapore, so it may choose cost-effective defense rather than high-tech military expansion.
    ________________________________________
    3. Impact of Budgetary Constraints
    Budget limits have several practical effects on Malaydesh ’s armed forces:
    1. Delayed Modernization
    o Acquisition of advanced aircraft, naval ships, and weapon systems may be postponed or scaled down.
    o Example: Procurement of new fighter jets or submarines can take decades from planning to delivery.
    2. Maintenance Challenges
    o Aging equipment sometimes cannot be replaced, leading to higher maintenance costs and operational limitations.
    o Some aircraft or naval vessels may be grounded due to lack of spare parts or funding.
    3. Operational Readiness
    o Limited funds can affect training exercises, personnel numbers, and military readiness.
    o The military may focus on territorial defense and counter-insurgency, rather than high-tech, long-range capabilities.
    4. Dependence on Foreign Suppliers
    o Malaydesh often relies on imports of military hardware, which can be costly and subject to international politics.
    ________________________________________
    4. Examples of Budget-Related Decisions
    • Air Force: Delays in acquiring modern fighter jets due to high costs; focus on upgrading older MiG-29s and Sukhoi Su-30s.
    • Navy: Limited new ship acquisitions; focus on patrol vessels for maritime security instead of expensive frigates.
    • Army: Equipment modernization is gradual; focus on light arms, armored vehicles, and special forces rather than full mechanized upgrades.
    ________________________________________
    5. Conclusion
    Malaydesh ’s military faces budgetary constraints due to a combination of economic priorities, limited GDP allocation, modernization costs, and debt management. While ATM remains capable for regional defense and internal security, high-end modernization and rapid expansion are restricted, requiring strategic prioritization of resources.

    BalasHapus
  28. 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣🤣.....



    APBN Dalam Tekanan: Saat Subsidi BBM & Listrik Jadi Bom Waktu Fiskal

    https://pluang.com/akademi/berita-analisis/APBN-dalam-tekanan

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      🔧 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped MRO Infrastructure
      • Malaydesh defense MRO sector is technically shallow, with most local firms focused on commercial aviation, not military-grade systems.
      • Despite having over 200 aerospace companies, only a handful are equipped to handle complex military platforms like fighter jets, naval combat systems, or armored vehicles.
      • The defense MRO ecosystem lacks dedicated facilities for:
      o Engine overhauls (especially for Su-30MKM and Hawk aircraft)
      o Combat system integration
      o Naval propulsion and sensor maintenance
      Impact: Military platforms face long downtimes and must rely on foreign OEMs for critical servicing.
      🧱 2. Slow Localization and Limited Technical Depth
      • Malaydesh has made partial progress in localizing MRO for platforms like the F/A-18D Hornet, but most high-end servicing still requires foreign technical assistance.
      • There is no national MRO roadmap aligned with defense modernization goals, unlike countries like Turkey or South Korea that have built robust domestic ecosystems through tech transfer and industrial offsets.
      • Local firms lack access to classified schematics, proprietary software, and advanced diagnostic tools needed for full-spectrum support.
      Impact: Strategic dependence persists, and Malaydesh cannot sustain its fleet autonomously during crises or embargoes.
      🕵️ 3. Weak Vendor Oversight and Governance
      • The 2025 Auditor-General’s Report flagged major lapses in vendor management:
      o RM162.75 million in late penalties were not collected
      o RM1.42 million in fines were never imposed for delayed maintenance
      • Contracts are often awarded to politically connected firms without rigorous performance benchmarks or technical vetting.
      • Oversight is fragmented across MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and service branches, leading to diffused accountability.
      Impact: Maintenance quality is inconsistent, costs are inflated, and readiness suffers.
      📉 4. Obsolete Platforms and Spare Part Bottlenecks
      • Malaydesh inventory includes 171 platforms over 30 years old, many of which require parts that are:
      o No longer manufactured
      o Sourced from defunct suppliers
      o Incompatible with newer systems
      • RM384.5 million was lost due to 1.62 million unused spare parts that no longer matched operational needs.
      Impact: Maintenance becomes reactive and inefficient, with high sunk costs and low operational returns.
      📊 Summary Table: MRO Asset Weaknesses in Malaydesh n Military
      Weakness Area Description Strategic Impact
      Infrastructure gaps Few facilities for military-grade MRO Long downtimes, foreign dependency
      Slow localization Limited tech transfer, no unified roadmap No autonomy in fleet sustainment
      Vendor oversight Poor contract enforcement, inflated costs Inconsistent quality, low accountability
      Spare part obsolescence Aging platforms, mismatched inventory Budget waste, reduced readiness
      🧭 Strategic Consequences
      • Malaydesh ability to sustain combat operations over time is compromised.
      • Without robust MRO capabilities, even newly acquired platforms (e.g. FA-50 jets, LCS ships) risk becoming high-cost liabilities.
      • Regional peers like Indonesia and Singapore are investing in integrated MRO hubs, giving them a long-term readiness advantage.

      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      Types of Loan Financing
      1. Foreign Export Credit:
      o Mechanism: When Malaydesh decides to buy defense equipment from a foreign country (e.g., submarines from France, fighter jets from Russia), the exporting country's government or its export credit agency often provides favorable loan terms to Malaydesh. This isn't just a commercial deal; it's a strategic tool for the exporting nation to promote its defense industry and build political influence.
      o Advantages for Malaydesh:
       Lower Interest Rates: Often come with subsidized interest rates compared to commercial loans.
       Longer Repayment Periods: Allows for spreading the cost over many years, easing immediate budget pressure.
      o Risks:
       Currency Risk: Loans are typically denominated in the currency of the exporting country (e.g., Euros, USD, Rubles). If the Malaydeshn Ringgit depreciates against these currencies, the cost of repayment in Ringgit terms increases significantly.
       Political Influence: The exporting country might gain leverage over Malaydesh's foreign policy or defense decisions due to the debt.
      -----------------
      2. International Bank Loans:
      o Mechanism: Malaydesh can secure loans from commercial banks or syndicates of banks, often international institutions, to finance defense purchases. These are more straightforward commercial transactions.
      o Advantages for Malaydesh:
       Flexibility: Can be used to purchase equipment from various suppliers, not tied to a specific exporting country's credit lines.
       Market Rates: While interest rates are market-driven, competitive bidding among banks can secure reasonable terms.
      o Risks:
       Higher Interest Rates: Generally higher than government-backed export credits.
       Shorter Repayment Periods: Compared to export credits, these might demand quicker repayment.
       Strict Covenants: Banks often impose covenants (conditions) that the borrower must adhere to, potentially limiting financial flexibility.
      -----------------
      3. Domestic Financing:
      o Mechanism: The Malaydeshn government can also raise funds domestically through issuing government bonds or borrowing from local financial institutions to fund defense projects.
      o Advantages for Malaydesh:
       No Currency Risk: Loans are denominated in Malaydeshn Ringgit, eliminating foreign exchange fluctuations as a direct risk to the loan principal and interest.
       Stimulates Domestic Economy: Money stays within the country's financial system.
      o Risks:
       Crowding Out: Large government borrowing can "crowd out" private sector investment by driving up domestic interest rates.
       Inflationary Pressure: Excessive domestic money creation or borrowing can contribute to inflation.
       Limited Capital: The domestic market might not always have the depth to fund extremely large, multi-billion dollar acquisitions.

      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      DENDA= USUSD83,8 juta
      • RM17.5 million in special damages
      • RM38.7 million in further damages
      • USUSD38.7 million (about RM297.3 million) in additional compensation
      -------------
      Defence contractor Aerotree Defence & Services Sdn Bhd has filed a RM353 million lawsuit against the Malaydeshn government and Defence Ministry for cancelling a five-year lease agreement involving four US-made Blackhawk UH-60A helicopters for the Malaydeshn army's air force unit.
      Filed through Messrs Hafarizam, Wan Aisha & Mubarak at the Kuala Lumpur High Court, the suit names the Defence Ministry secretary general, the ministry, and the federal government as defendants.
      In the statement of claim sighted by The Edge, Aerotree Defence is asking the court to order the Defence Ministry and the government to follow through with the helicopter lease deal based on the acceptance letter dated April 17, 2023. If the deal can’t be carried out, the company wants:
      • RM17.5 million in special damages
      • RM38.7 million in further damages
      • USUSD38.7 million (about RM297.3 million) in additional compensation
      Aerotree is also seeking to block the government from using a RM1.87 million bank guarantee it provided, and is asking for general damages for loss of reputation, plus exemplary and aggravated damages to be decided by the court.
      In its 31-page claim, Aerotree said the government had agreed to lease four Blackhawk helicopters for five years at RM187.5 million. The deal was a Private Finance Initiative, meaning the government wouldn’t bear any cost or risk, as Aerotree would own, operate, and maintain the helicopters. The company said the helicopters were fully mission-capable, including for air force transport operations.
      Aerotree is seeking a court declaration that the government’s termination of the agreement on Oct 31, 2024, is null and void.
      -----------------
      Helicopter deal timeline and delays
      Under the agreement, Aerotree was to deliver two helicopters within six months of the April 2023 acceptance letter, and the remaining two within nine months. The company also had to provide a non-cancellable RM1.87 million implementation bond, which it secured from Perwira Affin Bank in June 2023.
      Aerotree was also required to run a training and industrial collaboration programme. For this, it requested access to the Kuantan Air Force base to prepare a maintenance manual and obtain certification as an Approved Maintenance Organisation.
      In July 2023, Aerotree signed a deal with Turkey’s Havelsan for Blackhawk simulator training for 14 RMAF pilots. The following month, it signed a sales agreement with Slovakia’s Training Academy to purchase and upgrade four Blackhawk helicopters.
      Due to technical modifications, pilot training, and delays caused by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Aerotree requested three extensions — up to Oct 30, 2024 — for the helicopter deliveries. However, penalties for late delivery (LAD) still applied.
      Aerotree claimed the Defence Ministry and government failed to assist it in securing a loan from SME Bank, which was going through a board restructuring. A change in the Defence Minister further delayed necessary documents for loan approval. Despite this, the loan was approved but the company had yet to receive the deed of trust letter from the ministry so that the first payment could be made.
      The company said the government was aware of the reasons behind the delays but imposed unfair extension conditions that made it harder for Aerotree to complete the deal, ultimately setting the company up to fail.

      Hapus
  29. Krisis minyak duniya tak masalah,
    ✅️petrol, diesel, beras tak naik
    Kita malah SHOPPING NON-ST⛔️P,
    MOGAMI otewe haha!🤑😉🤑
    makloum Bajet Besar...Kaya..Kaya..Kaya haha!💰🤑💰


    sementara diseblah, negri🎰kasino semenanjung kl, Ekonomi menguncup
    ❌️petrol NAIK 28%
    ❌️diesel NAIK 58%
    ❌️apalagi beras KOSONK, harga NAIK,
    siyap2 maling fisank para warganyet kl haha!🍌😂🍌

    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    Japan woos Indonesia with stealth frigates ahead of Prabowo-Takaichi talks
    https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3347360/japan-woos-indonesia-stealth-frigates-ahead-prabowo-takaichi-talks

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. Kahsiyan warganyet pembual dibawah⬇️
      Koyak Kantongnya takde wang haha!😝😭😝

      naikk..naikkk..kepuncak gunung
      tinggi..tinggi harga minyaknya haha!😁😋😁

      Hapus

  30. Dengan keadaan ekonomi INDIANESIA HANCUR... saya mau lihat selama mana Menteri kewangan INDIANESIA sanggup menahan harga minyak ya... 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣



    Rupiah Rp17.000 Buat IHSG Turun 2,19% Terlemah di Bursa Asia

    https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/104867/rupiah-rp17-000-buat-ihsg-turun-2-19-terlemah-di-bursa-asia

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      THE MAIN KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN MALAYDESH MILITARY WITHOUT A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS STEM FROM A LACK OF A UNIFIED DOCTRINE, fragmented command, and limited indigenous expertise in the complex field of amphibious warfare.
      Fragmentation of Doctrine and Training
      A dedicated Marine Corps provides a single, cohesive doctrine for amphibious operations. In Malaydesh , this expertise is distributed across the Malaydesh Army and the Royal Malaydesh Navy (RMN), leading to several problems:
      • No Single Amphibious Doctrine: There is no single, codified doctrine that governs how land and sea forces should work together in an amphibious assault. While some units, like the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, have amphibious training, they are primarily land-centric. This creates a disconnect between the Army's maneuver doctrine and the Navy's ship-to-shore logistics.
      • Reliance on Foreign Partners: Malaydesh heavily relies on joint exercises with countries that have a Marine Corps, such as the U.S. and the Philippines. These exercises, like CARAT and Bersama Warrior, are crucial for developing skills and interoperability. However, this reliance means that Malaydesh forces are not constantly developing their own expertise and can only practice these complex operations during limited, often ad-hoc, training periods.
      Gaps in Expertise and Personnel
      A dedicated Marine Corps cultivates a deep bench of personnel with specialized knowledge in all aspects of amphibious warfare. The absence of this creates several key gaps in expertise:
      • Limited Specialist Roles: Amphibious warfare requires a wide range of specialized skills, from beach reconnaissance and hydrographic surveying to coordinating ship-to-shore fire support and managing logistics in a contested littoral environment. Without a Marine Corps, Malaydesh lacks a consistent, institutionalized way to train and retain personnel in these niche roles.
      • Challenges in Joint Operations: The lack of a shared understanding and common language between the Army and Navy can hinder effective joint operations. In a real-world scenario, this can lead to delays in decision-making, poor communication, and a lack of synchronized action—all of which are critical for the success of an amphibious landing.
      • Weakened Expeditionary Capability: A Marine Corps is an expeditionary force by nature, designed to deploy quickly and project power from the sea. Malaydesh military, without this dedicated component, lacks the ability to rapidly deploy a self-sustaining force for missions like humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, or securing remote territories. This is a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic state with a vast maritime domain.
      =============
      GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
      Federal Government Debt
      • End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
      • End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
      • Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
      Household Debt
      • 2025 : RM1.73 trillion, or 85.8% of GDP GDP


      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      THE MAIN KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN MALAYDESH MILITARY WITHOUT A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS STEM FROM A LACK OF A UNIFIED DOCTRINE, fragmented command, and limited indigenous expertise in the complex field of amphibious warfare.
      Fragmentation of Doctrine and Training
      A dedicated Marine Corps provides a single, cohesive doctrine for amphibious operations. In Malaydesh , this expertise is distributed across the Malaydesh Army and the Royal Malaydesh Navy (RMN), leading to several problems:
      • No Single Amphibious Doctrine: There is no single, codified doctrine that governs how land and sea forces should work together in an amphibious assault. While some units, like the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, have amphibious training, they are primarily land-centric. This creates a disconnect between the Army's maneuver doctrine and the Navy's ship-to-shore logistics.
      • Reliance on Foreign Partners: Malaydesh heavily relies on joint exercises with countries that have a Marine Corps, such as the U.S. and the Philippines. These exercises, like CARAT and Bersama Warrior, are crucial for developing skills and interoperability. However, this reliance means that Malaydesh forces are not constantly developing their own expertise and can only practice these complex operations during limited, often ad-hoc, training periods.
      Gaps in Expertise and Personnel
      A dedicated Marine Corps cultivates a deep bench of personnel with specialized knowledge in all aspects of amphibious warfare. The absence of this creates several key gaps in expertise:
      • Limited Specialist Roles: Amphibious warfare requires a wide range of specialized skills, from beach reconnaissance and hydrographic surveying to coordinating ship-to-shore fire support and managing logistics in a contested littoral environment. Without a Marine Corps, Malaydesh lacks a consistent, institutionalized way to train and retain personnel in these niche roles.
      • Challenges in Joint Operations: The lack of a shared understanding and common language between the Army and Navy can hinder effective joint operations. In a real-world scenario, this can lead to delays in decision-making, poor communication, and a lack of synchronized action—all of which are critical for the success of an amphibious landing.
      • Weakened Expeditionary Capability: A Marine Corps is an expeditionary force by nature, designed to deploy quickly and project power from the sea. Malaydesh military, without this dedicated component, lacks the ability to rapidly deploy a self-sustaining force for missions like humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, or securing remote territories. This is a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic state with a vast maritime domain.
      =============
      GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
      Federal Government Debt
      • End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
      • End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
      • Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
      Household Debt
      • 2025 : RM1.73 trillion, or 85.8% of GDP GDP


      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      ANALISIS PROYEKSI PELUNASAN HUTANG MALAYDESH 2053 VS. TREN PENAMBAHAN HUTANG TERKINI
      1. Latar Belakang Proyeksi 2053
      Malaydesh meramalkan dapat melunasi seluruh hutang pemerintah pada 2053 dengan asumsi tidak ada pinjaman baru untuk defisit atau refinancing mulai 2024.
      Per akhir 2022, total hutang pokok pemerintah Persekutuan tercatat RM 1,079.6 miliar atau 60.4% dari PDB; jika memasukkan liabilitas lain, jumlahnya mencapai RM 1.45 triliun (80.9% PDB).
      ===========
      Faktor Pemicu Penambahan Hutang
      • Pembiayaan 🦧GORILA IQ BOTOL = DEFISIT ANGGARAN yang terus berlangsung
      • Perpanjangan/rollover surat utang yang matang
      • Kenaikan biaya layanan hutang (Debt Service Charges naik dari RM 30.5 miliar 2018 ke RM 41.3 miliar 2022)
      • Kontinjensi liabilitas: jaminan pemerintah, 1MDB, dan liabilitas lainnya
      • Penurunan pertumbuhan pendapatan pajak saat ekonomi melambat
      ===========
      Kesimpulan
      Proyeksi pelunasan 2053 bersandar pada “nol pinjaman baru” — skenario yang saat ini jauh dari kenyataan. Tren pembiayaan defisit dan refinancing terus mengerek total hutang ke rekor baru. Tanpa langkah konsolidasi fiskal dan reformasi struktural yang tegas, target 2053 akan terus tertunda.
      ===========
      📊 Hutang Isi Rumah Malaydesh – Gambaran & Implikasi
      Data yang anda kongsikan daripada Bank Negara Malaydesh (BNM) memang mencerminkan satu realiti penting dalam ekonomi serantau:
      • Nilai: RM1.65 trilion (setakat Mac 2025)
      • Nisbah terhadap KDNK: 84.3%
      • Kedudukan: Tertinggi di ASEAN untuk nisbah hutang isi rumah/KDNK
      🔍 Kenapa angka ini tinggi?
      1. Akses mudah kepada kredit – Kad kredit, pinjaman peribadi, dan skim pembiayaan kenderaan/perumahan yang meluas.
      2. Harga rumah yang meningkat – Ramai bergantung pada pinjaman jangka panjang.
      3. Kos sara hidup yang tinggi, memaksa sebahagian isi rumah bergantung kepada hutang untuk menampung perbelanjaan.
      4. Pertumbuhan pendapatan yang perlahan berbanding kenaikan kos dan komitmen hutang.
      📈 Implikasi kepada ekonomi & rakyat
      • Kerentanan kewangan – Isi rumah lebih terdedah jika kadar faedah naik atau ekonomi meleset.
      • Kesannya kepada penggunaan – Perbelanjaan pengguna mungkin berkurangan kerana sebahagian pendapatan digunakan untuk membayar hutang.
      • Kestabilan kewangan negara – Bank pusat perlu mengimbangi pertumbuhan ekonomi dengan risiko kredit.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      ANALISIS PROYEKSI PELUNASAN HUTANG MALAYDESH 2053 VS. TREN PENAMBAHAN HUTANG TERKINI
      1. Latar Belakang Proyeksi 2053
      Malaydesh meramalkan dapat melunasi seluruh hutang pemerintah pada 2053 dengan asumsi tidak ada pinjaman baru untuk defisit atau refinancing mulai 2024.
      Per akhir 2022, total hutang pokok pemerintah Persekutuan tercatat RM 1,079.6 miliar atau 60.4% dari PDB; jika memasukkan liabilitas lain, jumlahnya mencapai RM 1.45 triliun (80.9% PDB).
      ===========
      Faktor Pemicu Penambahan Hutang
      • Pembiayaan 🦧GORILA IQ BOTOL = DEFISIT ANGGARAN yang terus berlangsung
      • Perpanjangan/rollover surat utang yang matang
      • Kenaikan biaya layanan hutang (Debt Service Charges naik dari RM 30.5 miliar 2018 ke RM 41.3 miliar 2022)
      • Kontinjensi liabilitas: jaminan pemerintah, 1MDB, dan liabilitas lainnya
      • Penurunan pertumbuhan pendapatan pajak saat ekonomi melambat
      ===========
      Kesimpulan
      Proyeksi pelunasan 2053 bersandar pada “nol pinjaman baru” — skenario yang saat ini jauh dari kenyataan. Tren pembiayaan defisit dan refinancing terus mengerek total hutang ke rekor baru. Tanpa langkah konsolidasi fiskal dan reformasi struktural yang tegas, target 2053 akan terus tertunda.
      ===========
      📊 Hutang Isi Rumah Malaydesh – Gambaran & Implikasi
      Data yang anda kongsikan daripada Bank Negara Malaydesh (BNM) memang mencerminkan satu realiti penting dalam ekonomi serantau:
      • Nilai: RM1.65 trilion (setakat Mac 2025)
      • Nisbah terhadap KDNK: 84.3%
      • Kedudukan: Tertinggi di ASEAN untuk nisbah hutang isi rumah/KDNK
      🔍 Kenapa angka ini tinggi?
      1. Akses mudah kepada kredit – Kad kredit, pinjaman peribadi, dan skim pembiayaan kenderaan/perumahan yang meluas.
      2. Harga rumah yang meningkat – Ramai bergantung pada pinjaman jangka panjang.
      3. Kos sara hidup yang tinggi, memaksa sebahagian isi rumah bergantung kepada hutang untuk menampung perbelanjaan.
      4. Pertumbuhan pendapatan yang perlahan berbanding kenaikan kos dan komitmen hutang.
      📈 Implikasi kepada ekonomi & rakyat
      • Kerentanan kewangan – Isi rumah lebih terdedah jika kadar faedah naik atau ekonomi meleset.
      • Kesannya kepada penggunaan – Perbelanjaan pengguna mungkin berkurangan kerana sebahagian pendapatan digunakan untuk membayar hutang.
      • Kestabilan kewangan negara – Bank pusat perlu mengimbangi pertumbuhan ekonomi dengan risiko kredit.

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      ANALISIS PROYEKSI PELUNASAN HUTANG MALAYDESH 2053 VS. TREN PENAMBAHAN HUTANG TERKINI
      1. Latar Belakang Proyeksi 2053
      Malaydesh meramalkan dapat melunasi seluruh hutang pemerintah pada 2053 dengan asumsi tidak ada pinjaman baru untuk defisit atau refinancing mulai 2024.
      Per akhir 2022, total hutang pokok pemerintah Persekutuan tercatat RM 1,079.6 miliar atau 60.4% dari PDB; jika memasukkan liabilitas lain, jumlahnya mencapai RM 1.45 triliun (80.9% PDB).
      ===========
      Faktor Pemicu Penambahan Hutang
      • Pembiayaan 🦧GORILA IQ BOTOL = DEFISIT ANGGARAN yang terus berlangsung
      • Perpanjangan/rollover surat utang yang matang
      • Kenaikan biaya layanan hutang (Debt Service Charges naik dari RM 30.5 miliar 2018 ke RM 41.3 miliar 2022)
      • Kontinjensi liabilitas: jaminan pemerintah, 1MDB, dan liabilitas lainnya
      • Penurunan pertumbuhan pendapatan pajak saat ekonomi melambat
      ===========
      Kesimpulan
      Proyeksi pelunasan 2053 bersandar pada “nol pinjaman baru” — skenario yang saat ini jauh dari kenyataan. Tren pembiayaan defisit dan refinancing terus mengerek total hutang ke rekor baru. Tanpa langkah konsolidasi fiskal dan reformasi struktural yang tegas, target 2053 akan terus tertunda.
      ===========
      📊 Hutang Isi Rumah Malaydesh – Gambaran & Implikasi
      Data yang anda kongsikan daripada Bank Negara Malaydesh (BNM) memang mencerminkan satu realiti penting dalam ekonomi serantau:
      • Nilai: RM1.65 trilion (setakat Mac 2025)
      • Nisbah terhadap KDNK: 84.3%
      • Kedudukan: Tertinggi di ASEAN untuk nisbah hutang isi rumah/KDNK
      🔍 Kenapa angka ini tinggi?
      1. Akses mudah kepada kredit – Kad kredit, pinjaman peribadi, dan skim pembiayaan kenderaan/perumahan yang meluas.
      2. Harga rumah yang meningkat – Ramai bergantung pada pinjaman jangka panjang.
      3. Kos sara hidup yang tinggi, memaksa sebahagian isi rumah bergantung kepada hutang untuk menampung perbelanjaan.
      4. Pertumbuhan pendapatan yang perlahan berbanding kenaikan kos dan komitmen hutang.
      📈 Implikasi kepada ekonomi & rakyat
      • Kerentanan kewangan – Isi rumah lebih terdedah jika kadar faedah naik atau ekonomi meleset.
      • Kesannya kepada penggunaan – Perbelanjaan pengguna mungkin berkurangan kerana sebahagian pendapatan digunakan untuk membayar hutang.
      • Kestabilan kewangan negara – Bank pusat perlu mengimbangi pertumbuhan ekonomi dengan risiko kredit.

      Hapus
    6. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM LCS CASH = LOAN
      1. Budget Allocation for Defence:
      • Annual Budget: Each year, the Malaydeshn government allocates a portion of its national budget to the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF). This allocation covers operational expenses (salaries, maintenance, training), procurement of new equipment, and infrastructure development.
      • Priorities: The size of the defence budget is determined by various factors, including the perceived security threats, regional geopolitical landscape, economic conditions, and the government's overall strategic priorities.
      • Transparency: Details of the defence budget, particularly specific procurement projects and their funding sources, are not always fully transparent, which can make it challenging to track the exact correlation with loans.
      2. Military Procurement and Modernization:
      • High Costs: Modern military equipment (fighter jets, naval vessels, armoured vehicles, advanced weaponry) is extremely expensive.
      • Modernization Plans: Malaydesh, like many nations, has ongoing military modernization plans to replace aging assets and enhance its defence capabilities. These plans often span several years and require significant investment.
      • "Buy Malaydeshn" vs. Imports: While there's a push to support local defence industries, many high-tech systems still need to be imported from foreign manufacturers.
      3. Impact on the National Budget and Economy:
      • Debt Servicing: Repaying military loans (principal and interest) becomes a recurring expenditure in the national budget. This can divert funds from other critical sectors like education, healthcare, or infrastructure development.
      • Fiscal Space: Excessive reliance on military loans can constrain the government's fiscal space, limiting its ability to respond to economic shocks or invest in other priorities.
      • Currency Fluctuations: If loans are denominated in foreign currencies, fluctuations in exchange rates can increase the cost of repayment in Ringgit.
      • Opportunity Cost: Every Ringgit spent on military loans is a Ringgit that cannot be spent elsewhere, representing an opportunity cost for the nation's development.
      4. Factors Influencing Loan Decisions:
      • Urgency of Need: Geopolitical tensions or perceived immediate threats can accelerate procurement decisions, making loans a more attractive option to acquire equipment quickly.
      • Cost-Benefit Analysis: Governments are supposed to conduct a cost-benefit analysis before taking out loans, considering the strategic importance of the equipment versus the financial implications.
      • Diplomatic Relations: Loan offers, especially from foreign governments, can be tied to broader diplomatic and strategic relationships.
      • Transparency and Accountability: The level of transparency in procurement processes and loan agreements is crucial for public accountability and ensuring that funds are used efficiently and without corruption.
      Example Scenario:
      Imagine Malaydesh decides to acquire a new fleet of multi-role combat aircraft.
      • The total cost might be RM10 billion.
      • The annual defence budget might only allocate RM1 billion for procurement.
      • To bridge the RM9 billion gap, the government might secure a combination of foreign military financing from the aircraft manufacturer's country (e.g., a loan from the US Exim Bank for F/A-18s) and commercial loans.
      • The repayment of these loans would then be factored into the national budget for the next 10-20 years, impacting the overall fiscal health.

      Hapus
    7. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 2,9%
      GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
      DEFISIT : 3,8%
      GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
      5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
      -
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. FA-50M Fighter Jets (South Korea, 2023):
      o Procurement: Malaydesh decided to acquire FA-50M light combat aircraft from South Korea.
      o Financing Mechanism: It is "likely tied to Korean financing packages (KEXIM export credit)." KEXIM (Export-Import Bank of Korea) is South Korea's official export credit agency. They frequently provide attractive financing terms (loans, guarantees) to facilitate the sale of Korean products, especially high-value items like aircraft, ships, and infrastructure projects, to foreign buyers.
      o Details: While specific details aren't fully disclosed (common for ongoing defense deals), this is described as "A typical arrangement for aircraft sales from Korea." This implies that KEXIM's involvement with favorable loan terms is a standard practice for large Korean defense exports.
      o Significance: Illustrates the strategic use of government-backed financing to win international defense contracts.
      -----------------
      2. NGPVs (Kedah-class Patrol Vessels, 1990s–2000s):
      o Procurement: Malaydesh acquired New Generation Patrol Vessels (NGPVs), built locally under a German license.
      o Financing Mechanism: "Financing reportedly included German export credit facilities." Even though the vessels were built locally, the German intellectual property, components, and expertise involved likely warranted German financial support.
      o Role of German ECA: This would involve a German export credit agency (like Euler Hermes) providing guarantees or direct loans to facilitate the transfer of technology and key components from Germany, and to support the overall project.
      o Significance: Shows that export credit financing can also apply to licensed local production, especially when substantial foreign components or technology transfer are involved
      -----------------
      1. Financier (e.g., Foreign Banks, Export Credit Agencies): Provides loans to the buyer to facilitate the purchase. These financiers are often from the seller's country and are sometimes backed by their own government.
      2. Export Credit Agency (ECA): A key player. ECAs (like France's Coface, South Korea's KEXIM, Germany's Euler Hermes) are government-backed institutions that provide guarantees or direct financing to support their country's exports. They reduce the risk for commercial banks lending to foreign buyers, making such loans more attractive.
      -----------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
      • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
      Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
      • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang


      Hapus
    8. 2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
      Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
      1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 347%
      2. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 224%
      3. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 223%
      4. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: 161%
      5. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
      6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
      7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
      8. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
      9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
      10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
      11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
      ---------------------------------
      KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      1. DENDA= USUSD83,8 juta
      Seperti dikutip The Edge Malaydesh (19/9/2025), Kontraktor pertahanan Aerotree Defence and Services Sdn Bhd telah mengajukan gugatan sebesar RM353 juta (USUSD83,8 juta) terhadap pemerintah dan Kementerian Pertahanan Malaydesh atas pembatalan perjanjian sewa lima tahun
      -------------
      2. SKANDAL KAPAL TEMPUR PESISIR (LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP/LCS)
      Ini adalah salah satu skandal pengadaan militer terbesar dan paling kontroversial di Malaydesh.
      • Proyek: Pengadaan enam kapal tempur pesisir untuk Angkatan Laut Kerajaan Malaydesh (Royal Malaydeshn Navy/RMN).
      • Nilai Proyek: Kontrak senilai RM9 miliar (sekitar USUSD2 miliar) ditandatangani pada tahun 2011.
      • Masalah Utama:
      a. Tidak ada kapal yang selesai: Meskipun pemerintah telah membayar lebih dari RM6 miliar, hingga kini belum ada satu pun dari enam kapal yang selesai dan dikirimkan.
      b. Penyalahgunaan dana: Laporan investigasi menemukan adanya dugaan penyalahgunaan dana, pembayaran yang tidak semestinya, dan penggelembungan harga (mark-up). Dana yang seharusnya digunakan untuk proyek justru digunakan untuk tujuan lain.
      c. Politik dan korupsi: Skandal ini menyeret sejumlah nama pejabat tinggi, termasuk mantan menteri pertahanan, yang diduga terlibat dalam praktik korupsi dan nepotisme.
      -------------
      3. SKANDAL KAPAL SELAM SCORPENE
      Skandal ini telah menjadi berita utama selama bertahun-tahun, bahkan melibatkan pengadilan di Prancis.
      • Proyek: Pembelian dua kapal selam kelas Scorpene dari perusahaan Prancis, DCNS (sekarang Naval Group), pada tahun 2002.
      • Nilai Proyek: Sekitar RM5,4 miliar.
      • Masalah Utama:
      a. Komisi besar-besaran: Terdapat dugaan pembayaran komisi sebesar 114 juta Euro kepada sebuah perusahaan yang terkait dengan pejabat senior Malaydesh.
      b. Kasus pembunuhan: Skandal ini juga terkait dengan pembunuhan seorang penerjemah wanita asal Mongolia, Altantuya Shaariibuu, yang diduga memiliki informasi terkait kontrak tersebut. Kasus ini telah menjadi salah satu babak tergelap dalam sejarah politik Malaydesh.
      -------------
      4. KONTROVERSI PENGADAAN JET TEMPUR A-4 SKYHAWK
      Kasus ini sering diangkat kembali, termasuk oleh Raja Malaydesh sendiri, sebagai contoh kegagalan pengadaan di masa lalu.
      • Proyek: Pembelian 88 unit jet tempur A-4 Skyhawk bekas dari Amerika Serikat pada tahun 1980-an.
      • Masalah Utama:
      a. Kondisi buruk: Dari 88 unit yang dibeli, hanya sekitar 40 unit yang bisa digunakan dan sisanya dianggap tidak layak terbang.
      b. Tingkat kecelakaan tinggi: Jet-jet yang dioperasikan mengalami tingkat kecelakaan yang tinggi, membahayakan nyawa pilot, dan akhirnya dipensiunkan. Raja Malaydesh menyebutnya sebagai "peti mati terbang" (flying coffin), istilah yang juga digunakan untuk mengkritik rencana pengadaan helikopter Black Hawk yang usianya sudah tua.
      -------------
      5. SKANDAL PENCURIAN MESIN PESAWAT TEMPUR F-5E
      Kasus ini adalah salah satu contoh nyata kelemahan dalam pengawasan aset militer.
      • Kasus: Hilangnya dua mesin pesawat tempur Northrop F-5E milik Angkatan Udara Kerajaan Malaydesh (RMAF) senilai sekitar USUSD29 juta.
      • Masalah Utama: Investigasi mengungkapkan bahwa mesin-mesin tersebut telah dicuri dari pangkalan militer dan kemudian dijual kepada perusahaan di Amerika Selatan. Insiden ini tidak hanya menunjukkan adanya pencurian internal, tetapi juga dugaan keterlibatan oknum pejabat militer. Mantan Kepala Angkatan Bersenjata Malaydesh bahkan mengakui bahwa kasus ini hanyalah puncak dari skandal korupsi yang lebih besar terkait peralatan militer.

      Hapus
    9. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ________________________________________
      HUTANG MALAYDESH (2018 - 2026):
      2018: RM 1,19 Triliun
      2019: RM 1,25 Triliun
      2020: RM 1,32 Triliun
      2021: RM 1,38 Triliun
      2022: RM 1,45 Triliun
      2023: RM 1,53 Triliun
      2024: RM 1,63 Triliun
      2025: RM 1,71 Triliun
      2026: RM 1,79 Triliun
      1. Bloomberg & Reuters (2018–2019): Laporan awal pengungkapan utang yang menembus angka RM1 triliun.
      2. CNA (2020): Analisis lonjakan utang akibat belanja stimulus pandemi COVID-19.
      3. The Edge Malaydesh (2021–2022): Rekaman akumulasi utang federal yang mencapai RM1,38 triliun.
      4. MOF Portal & The Star (2023–2024): Konfirmasi PM Anwar Ibrahim mengenai total utang/liabilitas sebesar RM1,5 triliun dan estimasi kenaikan ke RM1,63 triliun.
      5. Bernama & Edge Weekly (2025–2026): Proyeksi anggaran dan tantangan utang jangka menengah yang menyentuh RM1,7 triliun..
      -
      BNM = HOUSEHOLD DEBT IS ONE OF THE HIGHEST IN THE ASEAN ......
      MALAYDESH household DEBT is one of the highest in the ASEAN region. Against this backdrop, Bank Negara MALAYDESH (BNM) safeguards financial stability by monitoring and regulating the lending activity of all financial institutions in MALAYDESH , among other thingsof the highest in the ASEAN region. Against this backdrop, Bank Negara MALAYDESH (BNM) safeguards financial stability

      Hapus
  31. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    -
    INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
    GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 2,9%
    GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
    =============
    =============
    MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
    GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 3,8%
    GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
    5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
    -
    🔧 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped MRO Infrastructure
    • Malaydesh defense MRO sector is technically shallow, with most local firms focused on commercial aviation, not military-grade systems.
    • Despite having over 200 aerospace companies, only a handful are equipped to handle complex military platforms like fighter jets, naval combat systems, or armored vehicles.
    • The defense MRO ecosystem lacks dedicated facilities for:
    o Engine overhauls (especially for Su-30MKM and Hawk aircraft)
    o Combat system integration
    o Naval propulsion and sensor maintenance
    Impact: Military platforms face long downtimes and must rely on foreign OEMs for critical servicing.
    🧱 2. Slow Localization and Limited Technical Depth
    • Malaydesh has made partial progress in localizing MRO for platforms like the F/A-18D Hornet, but most high-end servicing still requires foreign technical assistance.
    • There is no national MRO roadmap aligned with defense modernization goals, unlike countries like Turkey or South Korea that have built robust domestic ecosystems through tech transfer and industrial offsets.
    • Local firms lack access to classified schematics, proprietary software, and advanced diagnostic tools needed for full-spectrum support.
    Impact: Strategic dependence persists, and Malaydesh cannot sustain its fleet autonomously during crises or embargoes.
    🕵️ 3. Weak Vendor Oversight and Governance
    • The 2025 Auditor-General’s Report flagged major lapses in vendor management:
    o RM162.75 million in late penalties were not collected
    o RM1.42 million in fines were never imposed for delayed maintenance
    • Contracts are often awarded to politically connected firms without rigorous performance benchmarks or technical vetting.
    • Oversight is fragmented across MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and service branches, leading to diffused accountability.
    Impact: Maintenance quality is inconsistent, costs are inflated, and readiness suffers.
    📉 4. Obsolete Platforms and Spare Part Bottlenecks
    • Malaydesh inventory includes 171 platforms over 30 years old, many of which require parts that are:
    o No longer manufactured
    o Sourced from defunct suppliers
    o Incompatible with newer systems
    • RM384.5 million was lost due to 1.62 million unused spare parts that no longer matched operational needs.
    Impact: Maintenance becomes reactive and inefficient, with high sunk costs and low operational returns.
    📊 Summary Table: MRO Asset Weaknesses in Malaydesh n Military
    Weakness Area Description Strategic Impact
    Infrastructure gaps Few facilities for military-grade MRO Long downtimes, foreign dependency
    Slow localization Limited tech transfer, no unified roadmap No autonomy in fleet sustainment
    Vendor oversight Poor contract enforcement, inflated costs Inconsistent quality, low accountability
    Spare part obsolescence Aging platforms, mismatched inventory Budget waste, reduced readiness
    🧭 Strategic Consequences
    • Malaydesh ability to sustain combat operations over time is compromised.
    • Without robust MRO capabilities, even newly acquired platforms (e.g. FA-50 jets, LCS ships) risk becoming high-cost liabilities.
    • Regional peers like Indonesia and Singapore are investing in integrated MRO hubs, giving them a long-term readiness advantage.

    BalasHapus
  32. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    -
    INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
    GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 2,9%
    GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
    =============
    =============
    MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
    GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 3,8%
    GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
    5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
    -
    🧱 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped Defense Industry
    • Malaydesh defense industry is overseen by the Malaydesh n Defence Industry Council (MDIC), established in 1999 and later expanded into MIDES.
    • Despite having six strategic sectors (Aerospace, Maritime, Weaponry, Automotive, ICT, Common-user Equipment), the ecosystem lacks:
    o A clear, enforceable blueprint
    o Robust infrastructure
    o Skilled manpower
    • Many local firms are assemblers or subcontractors, not full-spectrum developers. For example, Malaydesh still assembles M4 carbines under license, while Indonesia and Singapore produce their own rifles (SS1 and SAR-21 respectively).
    Impact: Malaydesh cannot independently design, produce, or sustain core military systems.
    🧠 2. Minimal R&D and Technology Investment
    • Indigenous R&D in areas like combat management systems (CMS), sensors, and autonomous platforms is nascent and underfunded.
    • Studies show that Malaydesh lacks structured tendering policies and technology readiness frameworks to support local innovation.
    • AI, cyber warfare, and surveillance systems are still in early-stage development, with no operational deployment.
    Impact: Malaydesh falls behind in emerging tech domains critical to modern warfare.
    🔄 3. Dependence on Foreign OEMs for Strategic Systems
    • Malaydesh imports nearly all major platforms:
    o Aircraft: Su-30MKM (Russia), FA-50 (South Korea), Hawk (UK)
    o Naval systems: Scorpène submarines (France), LCS (French-German design)
    o Missiles: Starstreak (UK), MICA (France), Exocet (France)
    • There are no indigenous missile programs, no local radar production, and no domestic armored vehicle design.
    Impact: Strategic vulnerability in times of embargo, conflict, or supply chain disruption.
    📉 4. Policy Gaps and Execution Failures
    • Malaydesh has published defense blueprints and industrial strategies, but implementation is weak due to:
    o Budget constraints
    o Lack of political continuity
    o Limited private-sector incentives
    • Even promising initiatives like the 15-to-5 naval transformation plan have stalled due to procurement scandals and delivery failures.
    Impact: Indigenous capability remains aspirational, not operational.
    📊 Summary Table: Weaknesses in Indigenous Capability Development
    Dimension Description Strategic Impact
    Industrial base Fragmented, lacks full-spectrum development No self-reliance in core systems
    R&D investment Minimal funding, weak frameworks Falls behind in emerging technologies
    Foreign dependency Imports all major platforms and weapons Vulnerable to external shocks
    Policy execution Strong on paper, weak in practice Stalled programs and missed timelines
    🧭 Strategic Consequences
    • Malaydesh cannot scale or sustain its military without foreign support.
    • It lacks the ability to customize systems to local needs, export defense products, or build strategic depth.
    • In contrast, countries like Indonesia (Pindad, PT PAL), Vietnam (Z111 Factory), and Singapore (ST Engineering) have made significant strides in indigenous capability

    BalasHapus
  33. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    -
    INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
    GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 2,9%
    GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
    =============
    =============
    MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
    GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 3,8%
    GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
    5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
    -
    THE MAIN KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN MALAYDESH MILITARY WITHOUT A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS STEM FROM A LACK OF A UNIFIED DOCTRINE, fragmented command, and limited indigenous expertise in the complex field of amphibious warfare.
    Fragmentation of Doctrine and Training
    A dedicated Marine Corps provides a single, cohesive doctrine for amphibious operations. In Malaydesh , this expertise is distributed across the Malaydesh Army and the Royal Malaydesh Navy (RMN), leading to several problems:
    • No Single Amphibious Doctrine: There is no single, codified doctrine that governs how land and sea forces should work together in an amphibious assault. While some units, like the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, have amphibious training, they are primarily land-centric. This creates a disconnect between the Army's maneuver doctrine and the Navy's ship-to-shore logistics.
    • Reliance on Foreign Partners: Malaydesh heavily relies on joint exercises with countries that have a Marine Corps, such as the U.S. and the Philippines. These exercises, like CARAT and Bersama Warrior, are crucial for developing skills and interoperability. However, this reliance means that Malaydesh forces are not constantly developing their own expertise and can only practice these complex operations during limited, often ad-hoc, training periods.
    Gaps in Expertise and Personnel
    A dedicated Marine Corps cultivates a deep bench of personnel with specialized knowledge in all aspects of amphibious warfare. The absence of this creates several key gaps in expertise:
    • Limited Specialist Roles: Amphibious warfare requires a wide range of specialized skills, from beach reconnaissance and hydrographic surveying to coordinating ship-to-shore fire support and managing logistics in a contested littoral environment. Without a Marine Corps, Malaydesh lacks a consistent, institutionalized way to train and retain personnel in these niche roles.
    • Challenges in Joint Operations: The lack of a shared understanding and common language between the Army and Navy can hinder effective joint operations. In a real-world scenario, this can lead to delays in decision-making, poor communication, and a lack of synchronized action—all of which are critical for the success of an amphibious landing.
    • Weakened Expeditionary Capability: A Marine Corps is an expeditionary force by nature, designed to deploy quickly and project power from the sea. Malaydesh military, without this dedicated component, lacks the ability to rapidly deploy a self-sustaining force for missions like humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, or securing remote territories. This is a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic state with a vast maritime domain.
    =============
    GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
    Federal Government Debt
    • End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
    • End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
    • Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
    Household Debt
    • 2025 : RM1.73 trillion, or 85.8% of GDP GDP


    BalasHapus
  34. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    -
    INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
    GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 2,9%
    GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
    =============
    =============
    MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
    GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
    DEFISIT : 3,8%
    GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
    5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
    -
    KLAIM LCS CASH = LOAN
    💰 1. LIMITED DOMESTIC DEFENSE BUDGET
    • Malaydesh’s defense budget is modest — around 1% of GDP, which restricts large-scale acquisitions.
    • Instead of upfront payments, Malaydesh often negotiates deferred payment schemes, installment plans, or loans backed by export credit agencies (ECAs) from supplier countries.
    • These financing models allow Malaydesh to acquire high-value assets without immediate fiscal strain.
    -----------------
    ⚙️ 2. Need for Advanced Technology and Capabilities
    Malaydesh lacks the domestic capacity to produce high-end military platforms, so it turns to foreign suppliers:
    Country Asset Procured Financing/Support Mechanism
    🇰🇷 South Korea FA-50 Light Combat Aircraft Industrial offsets, local assembly, favorable terms
    🇮🇹 Italy ATR-72 Maritime Patrol Aircraft G2G deal, possible ECA-backed financing
    🇹🇷 Turkey ANKA MALE Drones Strategic partnership, tech transfer
    These deals often include training, maintenance, and technology sharing, which Malaydesh cannot yet provide internally.
    -----------------
    🏭 3. Desire to Build Local Defense Industry
    Malaydesh wants to reduce dependency and stimulate its own defense ecosystem:
    • Offsets: Foreign suppliers agree to invest in Malaydesh’s defense industry or transfer technology.
    • Joint Ventures: Local firms like Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) are involved in assembly and integration.
    • Local Assembly: 14 of the FA-50 jets will be assembled in Malaydesh, building technical capacity.
    💸 Role of Loans in Defense Procurement
    While not always disclosed as “loans,” Malaydesh’s defense deals often involve:
    • Export Credit Agency (ECA) Financing: Countries like Italy and South Korea use ECAs to offer low-interest loans or guarantees to support defense exports.
    • G2G Agreements: These bypass middlemen and commissions, reducing corruption risks and allowing for more favorable financing terms3.
    • Strategic Installment Plans
    --------------------
    1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
    • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
    • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
    • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
    2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
    1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
    Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
    --------------------
    1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
    • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
    • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
    • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
    2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
    Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang

    BalasHapus
  35. 2025 TOTAL UTANG SWASTA + PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IIF Global Debt Monitor (Total Debt)
    1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 347%
    2. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 224%
    3. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 223%
    4. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: 161%
    5. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~130 - 150%
    6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: ~110 - 120%
    7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: ~80 - 95%
    8. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: ~75 - 85%
    9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~60 - 70%
    10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~30 - 40%
    11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~5 - 10%
    ---------------------------------
    2025 TOTAL UTANG PEMERINTAH TERHADAP GDP
    Sumber: IMF Global Debt Database (Government Debt)
    1. SINGAPURA 🇸🇬: 176,3%
    2. LAOS 🇱🇦: ~84,7% - 91%
    3. MALAYDESH 🇲🇾: 70,5%
    4. THAILAND 🇹🇭: 62,2%
    5. MYANMAR 🇲🇲: 63,0%
    6. FILIPINA 🇵🇭: 58,8%
    7. INDONESIA 🇮🇩: 41,1%
    8. VIETNAM 🇻🇳: ~34% - 37%
    9. KAMBOJA 🇰🇭: ~31,4%
    10. TIMOR LESTE 🇹🇱: ~16% - 20%
    11. BRUNEI 🇧🇳: ~2,3%
    ---------------------------------
    KLAIM KAYA CASH = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    • UTANG PEMERINTAH FEDERAL PER KAPITA: RM 36,139
    • UTANG RUMAH TANGGA PER KAPITA: RM 45,859
    Angka-angka ini cukup signifikan dan menunjukkan tingkat ketergantungan yang tinggi pada utang baik di tingkat pemerintah maupun rumah tangga.
    Implikasi Detail terhadap Perekonomian Riil:
    Implikasi Gabungan (Utang Pemerintah + Utang Rumah Tangga):
    1. Risiko Krisis Keuangan yang Lebih Tinggi:
    o Penjelasan: Kombinasi utang pemerintah dan rumah tangga yang tinggi menciptakan dua front kerentanan. Jika salah satu sektor goyah, ia bisa menarik sektor lainnya ke dalam masalah.
    o Dampak Riil: Jika terjadi perlambatan ekonomi, baik pemerintah maupun rumah tangga akan kesulitan membayar utang, menciptakan efek domino yang parah dan potensi krisis keuangan yang dalam.
    2. Ruang Gerak Kebijakan yang Terbatas:
    o Penjelasan: Baik pemerintah maupun bank sentral memiliki ruang gerak yang terbatas untuk merespons krisis ekonomi.
    o Dampak Riil:
     Stimulus Fiskal Sulit: Pemerintah mungkin kesulitan meluncurkan paket stimulus fiskal (misalnya, melalui pengeluaran infrastruktur atau bantuan sosial) jika utangnya sudah sangat tinggi.
     Batas Bawah Suku Bunga: Bank sentral mungkin sudah menurunkan suku bunga ke tingkat yang sangat rendah untuk mendukung ekonomi, sehingga tidak banyak lagi "amunisi" tersisa jika terjadi krisis lebih lanjut.
    3. Ketidakpastian Ekonomi dan Investor:
    o Penjelasan: Tingkat utang yang tinggi secara keseluruhan menciptakan ketidakpastian bagi investor domestik maupun asing.
    o Dampak Riil: Investor cenderung menghindari negara dengan tingkat utang yang meragukan, mengurangi investasi dan berpotensi memicu pelarian modal (capital flight), yang akan melemahkan mata uang dan memperburuk kondisi ekonomi.

    BalasHapus
  36. Pertamina Tanggung..? 🔥🔥🤣🤣



    Harga BBM Gak Naik, Purbaya: Pertamina Tanggung Sementara

    https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20260401151849-4-723236/harga-bbm-gak-naik-purbaya-pertamina-tanggung-sementara

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      SEWA 53 HELI BEKAS
      SEWA 53 HELI BEKAS
      SEWA 53 HELI BEKAS
      TUDM SEWA =
      12 AW149
      4 AW139
      5 EC120B
      TLDM SEWA =
      2 AW159
      TDM SEWA =
      4 UH-60A
      12 AW149
      BOMBA SEWA =
      4 AW139
      POLIS SEWA =
      7 BELL429
      MMEA SEWA =
      2 AW159
      JABATAN PM SEWA =
      1 AW189
      https://www.facebook.com/share/p/gnmpDnsCCTn8tx6b/
      ---
      12 HELI AW 149 SEWA = The government has decided that RMAF will operate at least twelve Leonardo AW149 utility helicopters under a leasing programme mooted by the Prime Minister’s Department and the National Security Council, Armed Forces chief General TS Mohammad Ab Rahman said today.
      =============
      MENERUSI KAEDAH SEWA HELI LYNX = Panglima TLDM, terdapat kemungkinan angkatan itu mendapatkan helikopter baru itu menerusi kaedah SEWA apabila perkhidmatan helikopter Super Lynx Mk300 itu dihentikan secara berperingkat. Antara nama-nama helikopter yang disebut-sebut berpotensi untuk menggantikan helikopter Super Lynx milik TLDM adalah AW159 “Wildcat” yang dibangunkan oleh syarikat Leonardo.
      =============.
      2024 HELI DEBT HELI SEWA BEKAS BATAL = Tentera Darat MALAYDESH (TDM) kekal dengan pendirian mengusulkan pembatalan kontrak SEWAan helikopter Black Hawk kepada Kementerian Pertahanan berikutan kegagalan kontraktor memenuhi obligasi yang ditetapkan.
      =============
      SEWA HELI UH60A : Kementerian Pertahanan MALAYDESH pada 27 Mei 2023 lalu telah menandatangani perjanjian SEWA dengan penyedia layanan penerbangan lokal, Aerotree, untuk menyediakan empat helikopter bekas Sikorsky UH-60A+ Black Hawk.
      SEWA HELI AW139 : 4 buah Helikopter Leonardo AW 139 yang diperolehi secara SEWAan ini adalah untuk kegunaan Tentera Udara Diraja MALAYDESH (TUDM) yang akan ditempatkan di No.3 Skuadron, Pangkalan Udara Butterworth
      SEWA HELI EC120B : Kerajaan sebelum ini pernah menyewa Helikopter Latihan Airbus EC120B dan Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD) Untuk Kegunaan Kursus Asas Juruterbang Helikopter TUDM. Selain itu, kerajaan turut pernah menyewa 5 unit Helikopter EC120B; 1 unit Sistem Simulator
      SEWA PESAWAT L39 ITTC is currently providing Fighter Lead-In Training (FLIT) to the Royal MALAYDESH Air Force in London, Ontario. ITTC operates a fleet of Aero Vodochody L-39 featuring upgraded avionics for the FLIT programme
      SEWA VVSHORAD SEWA TRUK
      The approved leasing deal for KTMB may tip the scale in favour of the truck and VVSHORAD proposals.
      SEWA PATROL BOATS : SEWA OUTBOARD MOTORS : SEWA TRAILERS
      Meanwhile, the division also published a tender for eleven glass reinforced plastic patrol boats together outboard motors, trailers and associated equipment
      SEWA BOAT SEWAan Bot Op Pasir merangkumi 10 unit Fast Interceptor Boat (FIB); 10 unit Utility Boat; 10 unit Rigid Hull Fender Boat (RHFB); 10 unit Rover Fiber Glass (Rover).
      SEWA HIDROGRAFI tugas pemetaan data batimetri bagi kawasan perairan negara akan dilakukan oleh sebuah kapal hidrografi moden, MV Aishah AIM 4, yang diperoleh menerusi kontrak SEWAan dari syarikat Breitlink Engineering Services Sdn Bhd (BESSB)
      SEWA 4x4 Pejabat perusahaan mengatakan kepada Janes di pameran bahwa Angkatan Bersenjata MALAYDESH sedang mencari untuk menyewa Tarantula
      SEWA MOTOR The Royal Military Police Corp (KPTD) celebrated the SEWA of 40 brand-new BMW R1250RT Superbikes for the Enforcement Motorcycle Squad on December 22nd, 2022.

      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ________________________________________
      2026 FREEZES PROCUREMENT - 2023 CANCELLED PROCUREMENT
      FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEBT = PER PEOPLE : RM 36,139
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT = PER PEOPLE : RM 45,859.
      GOV + HOUSEHOLD = PER PEOPLE : RM 81,998
      ---------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
      • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
      Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
      --------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
      • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang

      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ________________________________________
      2026 FREEZES PROCUREMENT - 2023 CANCELLED PROCUREMENT
      FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEBT = PER PEOPLE : RM 36,139
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT = PER PEOPLE : RM 45,859.
      GOV + HOUSEHOLD = PER PEOPLE : RM 81,998
      ---------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
      • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
      Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
      --------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
      • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      -
      2005: Prank China (KS-1A)
      Najib Razak menyatakan Malaydesh setuju secara prinsip membeli rudal jarak menengah KS-1A dari China dengan imbalan transfer teknologi. Hasil: Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga saat ini.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Malaydesh dilaporkan mempersempit pilihan ke Dassault Rafale untuk pengadaan 18 jet tempur senilai USD 2 miliar. Hasil: Proyek ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) di DSA 2016 untuk 20 unit artileri Caesar 155mm. Hasil: Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; Malaydesh akhirnya memilih unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      “The MALAYDESH government has shown interest in buying the JF-17 Thunder aircraft from Pakistan but the deal is yet to be finalized,” a senior Pakistan Ministry of Defense Production official told Arab News. Hasil: Malaydesh tiada akusisi jet tersebut.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim bahwa kontrak kapal MRSS akan ditandatangani Agustus 2018. Hasil: Hingga saat ini, kontrak tersebut tidak pernah terealisasi dengan PT PAL.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Malaydesh mengidentifikasi Tejas sebagai kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut. Hasil: Malaydesh justru memilih FA-50 Block 20 dari Korea Selatan pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Kemenhan Malaydesh meninjau ulang rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm setelah sebelumnya dikabarkan akan dibeli. Hasil: Dibatalkan/diganti dengan sistem lain.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Malaydesh diharapkan menyelesaikan kesepakatan untuk pasokan EVA 155mm. Hasil: Senasib dengan Yavuz, tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      =
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Sembilan kendaraan IAG Guardian yang dikirim untuk misi PBB (UNIFIL) dinyatakan tidak memenuhi persyaratan operasional, berujung pada sanksi pemotongan biaya operasional.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Black Hawk
      Ini menjadi salah satu "prank" terbesar baru-baru ini. Malaydesh berencana menyewa empat helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari perusahaan lokal Aerotree Defence & Services untuk menggantikan helikopter Nuri yang sudah tua.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Kuwait - Jet Tempur F/A-18 Hornet
      Malaydesh menunjukkan ketertarikan kuat untuk membeli jet tempur F/A-18 Hornet bekas milik Angkatan Udara Kuwait untuk menambah kekuatan udara mereka secara instan.
      -.
      2026 Pembekuan Pengadaan Massal
      Kejadian: Pada awal 2026, PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan semua keputusan pengadaan militer karena adanya penyelidikan dugaan korupsi dan kartel dalam kementerian pertahanan. Ini berdampak pada rencana-rencana yang sedang dibahas sepanjang 2024 dan 2025.
      ----------------
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69%
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3%
      =============
      ============
      INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP

      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ________________________________________
      2026 IDN : USD 20 MILIAR versus MY : USD 4,7 MILIAR
      ---------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN ANGGARAN PERTAHANAN ASEAN 2026 =
      -
      1. INDONESIA
      Rp 335,2 triliun (~USD 20 miliar). Lonjakan 37% dari 2025; fokus pada alutsista baru dan konsep pertahanan total.
      -
      2. SINGAPURA
      SGD 20 miliar (~USD 15 miliar). Konsisten 3–4% dari PDB; investasi jangka panjang untuk teknologi pertahanan canggih.
      -
      3. VIETNAM
      USD 6–7 miliar (estimasi). Tren meningkat, diproyeksi mencapai USD 10,2 miliar pada 2029; fokus pada Laut Cina Selatan.
      -
      4. THAILAND
      204,434 juta baht (~USD 5,7 miliar). Prioritas pada akuisisi jet Gripen dan modernisasi angkatan udara.
      -
      5. FILIPINA
      295–299 miliar (~USD 5,2 miliar). Naik 16% dari 2025; termasuk ₱40 miliar untuk program modernisasi AFP, dengan fokus pada penguatan airpower dan sistem pertahanan rudal
      -
      6. MALAYDESH
      RM 21,2–21,7 miliar (~USD 4,5–4,7 miliar). Fokus modernisasi bertahap: sistem pertahanan udara, kapal perang, dan kendaraan taktis

      Hapus
    6. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ________________________________________
      2026 IDN : USD 20 MILIAR versus MY : USD 4,7 MILIAR
      ---------------------------
      PERBANDINGAN ANGGARAN PERTAHANAN ASEAN 2026 =
      -
      1. INDONESIA
      Rp 335,2 triliun (~USD 20 miliar). Lonjakan 37% dari 2025; fokus pada alutsista baru dan konsep pertahanan total.
      -
      2. SINGAPURA
      SGD 20 miliar (~USD 15 miliar). Konsisten 3–4% dari PDB; investasi jangka panjang untuk teknologi pertahanan canggih.
      -
      3. VIETNAM
      USD 6–7 miliar (estimasi). Tren meningkat, diproyeksi mencapai USD 10,2 miliar pada 2029; fokus pada Laut Cina Selatan.
      -
      4. THAILAND
      204,434 juta baht (~USD 5,7 miliar). Prioritas pada akuisisi jet Gripen dan modernisasi angkatan udara.
      -
      5. FILIPINA
      295–299 miliar (~USD 5,2 miliar). Naik 16% dari 2025; termasuk ₱40 miliar untuk program modernisasi AFP, dengan fokus pada penguatan airpower dan sistem pertahanan rudal
      -
      6. MALAYDESH
      RM 21,2–21,7 miliar (~USD 4,5–4,7 miliar). Fokus modernisasi bertahap: sistem pertahanan udara, kapal perang, dan kendaraan taktis

      Hapus
    7. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ==============
      ==============
      DAFTAR PENGADAAN ALUTSISTA ON PROGRESS
      2 KRI Frigate Brawijaya Class dari Italia
      2 KRI Frigate Merah Putih dari PT PAL
      2 KRI Frigate Istif Class dari Turkiye
      1 KRI Rigel Class dari Palindo/Jerman
      2 KRI Kapal Cepat Rudal dari Turkiye
      1 KRI Kapal Cepat Rudal dari Tesco Bekasi
      2 KS Scorpene dari Perancis & PT PAL
      1 Kapal Induk Giribaldi dari Italia
      1 Kapal LHD Helikopter dari PT PAL
      42 Jet Tempur Rafale dari Perancis
      48 Jet Tempur IFX kerjasama Korsel RI
      48 Jet Tempur KHAAN dari Turkiye
      6 Jet Tempur T50 dari Korsel
      2 Pesawat angkut A400M dari Spanyol
      13 Radar GCI dari Thales Perancis
      12 Radar Retia dari Retia
      3 Baterai Rudal Balistik KHAN Turkiye
      3 Baterai Rudal ADS Trisula dari Turkiye
      22 Helikopter Blackhawk dari AS
      12 Drone Anka dari Turkiye
      60 Drone Bayraktar TB3 dari Turkiye
      45 Rudal anti kapal Atmaca dari Turkiye

      Hapus
  37. saya mau lihat selama mana Menteri kewangan INDIANESIA sanggup menahan harga minyak ya... 🔥🔥🤣🤣🤣



    Rupiah Rp17.000 Buat IHSG Turun 2,19% Terlemah di Bursa Asia

    https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/104867/rupiah-rp17-000-buat-ihsg-turun-2-19-terlemah-di-bursa-asia

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      SEWA 53 HELI BEKAS
      SEWA 53 HELI BEKAS
      SEWA 53 HELI BEKAS
      TUDM SEWA =
      12 AW149
      4 AW139
      5 EC120B
      TLDM SEWA =
      2 AW159
      TDM SEWA =
      4 UH-60A
      12 AW149
      BOMBA SEWA =
      4 AW139
      POLIS SEWA =
      7 BELL429
      MMEA SEWA =
      2 AW159
      JABATAN PM SEWA =
      1 AW189
      https://www.facebook.com/share/p/gnmpDnsCCTn8tx6b/
      ---
      12 HELI AW 149 SEWA = The government has decided that RMAF will operate at least twelve Leonardo AW149 utility helicopters under a leasing programme mooted by the Prime Minister’s Department and the National Security Council, Armed Forces chief General TS Mohammad Ab Rahman said today.
      =============
      MENERUSI KAEDAH SEWA HELI LYNX = Panglima TLDM, terdapat kemungkinan angkatan itu mendapatkan helikopter baru itu menerusi kaedah SEWA apabila perkhidmatan helikopter Super Lynx Mk300 itu dihentikan secara berperingkat. Antara nama-nama helikopter yang disebut-sebut berpotensi untuk menggantikan helikopter Super Lynx milik TLDM adalah AW159 “Wildcat” yang dibangunkan oleh syarikat Leonardo.
      =============.
      2024 HELI DEBT HELI SEWA BEKAS BATAL = Tentera Darat MALAYDESH (TDM) kekal dengan pendirian mengusulkan pembatalan kontrak SEWAan helikopter Black Hawk kepada Kementerian Pertahanan berikutan kegagalan kontraktor memenuhi obligasi yang ditetapkan.
      =============
      SEWA HELI UH60A : Kementerian Pertahanan MALAYDESH pada 27 Mei 2023 lalu telah menandatangani perjanjian SEWA dengan penyedia layanan penerbangan lokal, Aerotree, untuk menyediakan empat helikopter bekas Sikorsky UH-60A+ Black Hawk.
      SEWA HELI AW139 : 4 buah Helikopter Leonardo AW 139 yang diperolehi secara SEWAan ini adalah untuk kegunaan Tentera Udara Diraja MALAYDESH (TUDM) yang akan ditempatkan di No.3 Skuadron, Pangkalan Udara Butterworth
      SEWA HELI EC120B : Kerajaan sebelum ini pernah menyewa Helikopter Latihan Airbus EC120B dan Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD) Untuk Kegunaan Kursus Asas Juruterbang Helikopter TUDM. Selain itu, kerajaan turut pernah menyewa 5 unit Helikopter EC120B; 1 unit Sistem Simulator
      SEWA PESAWAT L39 ITTC is currently providing Fighter Lead-In Training (FLIT) to the Royal MALAYDESH Air Force in London, Ontario. ITTC operates a fleet of Aero Vodochody L-39 featuring upgraded avionics for the FLIT programme
      SEWA VVSHORAD SEWA TRUK
      The approved leasing deal for KTMB may tip the scale in favour of the truck and VVSHORAD proposals.
      SEWA PATROL BOATS : SEWA OUTBOARD MOTORS : SEWA TRAILERS
      Meanwhile, the division also published a tender for eleven glass reinforced plastic patrol boats together outboard motors, trailers and associated equipment
      SEWA BOAT SEWAan Bot Op Pasir merangkumi 10 unit Fast Interceptor Boat (FIB); 10 unit Utility Boat; 10 unit Rigid Hull Fender Boat (RHFB); 10 unit Rover Fiber Glass (Rover).
      SEWA HIDROGRAFI tugas pemetaan data batimetri bagi kawasan perairan negara akan dilakukan oleh sebuah kapal hidrografi moden, MV Aishah AIM 4, yang diperoleh menerusi kontrak SEWAan dari syarikat Breitlink Engineering Services Sdn Bhd (BESSB)
      SEWA 4x4 Pejabat perusahaan mengatakan kepada Janes di pameran bahwa Angkatan Bersenjata MALAYDESH sedang mencari untuk menyewa Tarantula
      SEWA MOTOR The Royal Military Police Corp (KPTD) celebrated the SEWA of 40 brand-new BMW R1250RT Superbikes for the Enforcement Motorcycle Squad on December 22nd, 2022.

      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ________________________________________
      2026 PM says =
      MISKIN ...... 2026 = FREEZES PROCUREMENT
      -
      KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The procurement decisions of the Malaydeshn armed forces and the police linked to a corruption probed will be temporarily frozen until they fully comply with related rules, state media reported, citing Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.
      ------------------
      2023 PM says =
      MISKIN ...... 2023 = CANCELLED 5 (FIVE) PROCUREMENT
      -
      KUALA LUMPUR:
      The defence ministry has 2023 = CANCELLED FIVE PROCUREMENT tenders for supplies, services and infrastructure projects. The cancellations were to avoid leakages in expenditure, and were in line with a policy of procurement through open tenders

      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      -
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
      ________________________________________
      5x GANTI PM = AKAN
      6x GANTI MENHAN = AKAN
      MALAYDESH : NOL (KOSONG)
      -
      2025 = 84,3% DARI GDP
      MISKIN KLAIM LUNAS 2053 = GAGAL (NAMBAH DEBT)
      -
      PERDANA MENTERI = TIDAK BAYAR TERTUNGGAK
      MENTERI PERTAHANAN = KEKANGAN KEWANGAN
      97.000 EKSODUS = 2018-2026 HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
      --------------------------
      SALAM NGEMIS F18 KUWAIT 2025-2017=
      5x GANTI PERDANA MENTERI
      5x GANTI MENTERI PERTAHANAN
      -
      SALAM MANGKRAK LCS 2025-2011 =
      5x GANTI PERDANA MENTERI
      6x GANTI MENTERI PERTAHANAN
      -
      MEMBUAL SPH 2025-2016 =
      5x GANTI PERDANA MENTERI
      5x GANTI MENTERI PERTAHANAN
      -
      2026 = ZONK = NGEMIS MEMBUAL MISKIN

      Hapus
    4. INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
      GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
      =============
      =============
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69%
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3%
      -
      2025 = MELARAT
      DEFICIT RM 92.8 BILLION
      -
      Bank Negara Negeri Kasino just borrowed another RM 5.0 billion to bring the budget deficit up to RM 92.8 billion. The prime/finance minister Anwar Ibrahim stated the budget deficit would be RM 79.9 billion when he brought down the budget 2025 in October last year in the Dewan Rakyat.
      ============
      KLAIM RINGGIT KUAT = AGREEMENT ON RECIPROCAL TRADE (ART):
      DONALD DUCK WIN = 🦧GORILA LOSES
      DONALD DUCK WIN = 🦧GORILA LOSES
      DONALD DUCK WIN = 🦧GORILA LOSES
      --------------
      Section 1: Tariffs and Quotas
      Article 1.1: Elimination or reduction of tariffs on substantially all U.S. exports to Malaydesh.
      Article 1.2: Establishment of U.S. reciprocal tariffs on Malaydeshn products at a rate of 19% (pursuant to U.S. Executive Order 14257), with certain specified products reduced to 0%.
      Article 1.3: Prohibition on the imposition of quantitative restrictions (quotas) on the importation of goods from the United States.
      --------------
      Section 2: Non-Tariff Barriers and Related Matters
      Article 2.5 (Cheese and Meat Terms): Malaydesh shall not restrict market access for U.S. products solely based on the use of certain common names for cheese and meat.
      Article 2.8 (Good Regulatory Practices/GRP): Malaydesh is committed to adopting transparency, predictability, and public participation throughout the regulatory rulemaking cycle.
      Other Articles: Standardization of Halal requirements for cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices, as well as the acceptance of U.S. motor vehicle safety and emission standards.
      --------------
      Section 3: Digital Trade and Technology
      Data Provisions: Prohibition of discrimination against U.S. digital services and an obligation to facilitate cross-border data transfers.
      Digital Taxation: Malaydesh commits to refraining from imposing discriminatory digital services taxes on U.S. companies.
      Technology: Prohibition of forced technology transfers or source code disclosure as a condition for doing business.
      --------------
      Section 4: Rules of Origin
      Establishing specific rules to determine whether a good qualifies as originating from Malaydesh or the U.S. to receive preferential tariff treatment.
      --------------
      Section 5: Economic and National Security
      Article 5.1.1 (Sanctions): If the U.S. takes action for national security purposes, Malaydesh is expected to adopt similar measures with equivalent restrictive effects or agree on a timeline for implementation.
      Article 5.2 (Export Controls): Cooperation on investment screening and export controls to prevent duty circumvention.
      Article 5.3 (Other Measures):
      Restrictions on the procurement of nuclear reactors, fuel rods, or enriched uranium from certain countries deemed inconsistent with U.S. interests.
      Commitment by Malaydesh not to prohibit or restrict the export of critical minerals and rare earth elements to the U.S.
      --------------
      Section 6: Commercial Considerations and Opportunities
      Purchase Commitments: Documentation of major commercial agreements, including the purchase of 30 Boeing aircraft, up to 5 million tonnes of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) per annum, and coal commodities.
      Investment: Malaydesh facilitates approximately USD 70 billion in investments into the United States over a 10-year period.
      --------------
      Section 7: Implementation and Final Provisions
      Termination Clause: The U.S. reserves the right to terminate the agreement and reinstate higher tariffs if Malaydesh enters into new trade agreements with other nations deemed harmful to core U.S. interests.
      Consultation Mechanism: Emphasis on resolving disputes through bilateral consultations and negotiations

      Hapus
    5. KLAIM CASH = HUTANG ASET MILITER
      -
      1. 🇹🇷 Turki (LMS Batch 2)
      Model: G2G (Antar Pemerintah) via SSB.
      Bunga: 4% – 6% (Fixed/OECD CIRR).
      Tenor: 10 – 15 Tahun.
      -
      2. 🇰🇷 Korea Selatan (Pesawat FA-50)
      Model: Hybrid (Kredit KEXIM & Barter CPO 50%).
      Biaya: Management Fee sangat rendah (0,10% - 0,50%).
      -
      3. 🇬🇧 Inggris (Standar UKEF - Pesawat Hawk)
      Syarat: Wajib DP 15% (Standar OECD).
      Bunga: Stabil, mengikuti National Loans Fund.
      -
      4. 🇨🇳 China (LMS Batch 1)
      Model: 100% Kredit Ekspor (China Eximbank).
      Bunga: Sangat murah (3,5% Fixed).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun.
      -
      5. 🇵🇱 Polandia (Tank PT-91M)
      Model: DP 15% + Barter CPO (30-40%).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun cicilan.
      -
      6. 🇩🇪 Jerman (Kedah-Class)
      Model: Kredit Komersial dijamin negara (Euler Hermes).
      Pendana: Deutsche Bank & Konsorsium.
      -
      7. Kredit Sindikasi (Proyek LCS - 17 Kreditor/Hutang)
      Model: Konsorsium Bank Domestik/Intl (Skala Masif).
      Bunga: 6% (Saldo Menurun).
      Tenor: 15 Tahun (Akibat penundaan proyek).
      ------------------
      2026 PM says =
      MISKIN ...... 2026 = FREEZES PROCUREMENT
      -
      KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The procurement decisions of the Malaydeshn armed forces and the police linked to a corruption probed will be temporarily frozen until they fully comply with related rules, state media reported, citing Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.
      The suspension comes following allegations of bribery linked to army procurement projects, with the Malaydeshn Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) raiding several firms suspected of involvement in a bribery scheme and freezing six bank accounts belonging to a suspect and their family members.
      https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/malaydesh-freezes-army-police-procurement-decisions-linked-corruption-pm-says-2026-01-16/#:~:text=Malaydesh%20freezes%20army%20and%20police,Reuters
      -
      2026 PM BEKUKAN PENGADAAN =
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecL7_O1Wn1k
      ------------------
      2023 PM says =
      MISKIN ...... 2023 = CANCELLED 5 (FIVE) PROCUREMENT
      -
      KUALA LUMPUR:
      The defence ministry has 2023 = CANCELLED FIVE PROCUREMENT tenders for supplies, services and infrastructure projects. The cancellations were to avoid leakages in expenditure, and were in line with a policy of procurement through open tenders.
      “Mindef has also taken serious note of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s statement regarding the leakage in expenditure at the Budget 2023 dialogue on Tuesday,” it said in a statement today
      ----------------
      🦧GORILA KLAIM =
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      LEBIH CEPAT DELIVERY FA50M
      -
      GEMPURWIRA22 Februari 2025 pukul 07.40
      Nampak tak cara layanan Korea sama MALAYDESH.... Mereka siapkan segera FA-50M BLOCK 20 MALAYDESH....
      Kerana MALAYDESH ada wang bayar CASH bukan HUTANG macam INDIANESIA.. 😎😎🇲🇾🇲🇾
      -
      MMW22 Februari 2025 pukul 09.03
      Dulu kan saya dah kata.
      Kontrak kami ada isi (ada wang).
      Kontrak kamu kosong! Kena tunggu PSP. Kena tunggu uang diberi lender.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Lepas ni kami akan sign kontrak utk batch kedua F/A-50M.
      RMK13 pula tender utk 5th gen dibuka. Kamu dpt Rafale 4.5 gen. Kami dpt 5gen terus 🤣🤣🤣🤣
      -
      MMW22 Februari 2025 pukul 08.49
      Bro.... aku teringin tengok Panglima TNI AU melawat progress produksi Rafale.
      Kalau ada gambar, post le.
      Admin sila bantu! 🤣🤣🤣
      -
      MMW22 Februari 2025 pukul 08.51
      Aku teringin tengok Panglima TNI AU melawat progress produksi Rafale.
      Kalau ada gambar, post le.
      Admin sila bantu! 😅😅😅😅

      Hapus
    6. KLAIM CASH = HUTANG ASET MILITER
      -
      1. 🇹🇷 Turki (LMS Batch 2)
      Model: G2G (Antar Pemerintah) via SSB.
      Bunga: 4% – 6% (Fixed/OECD CIRR).
      Tenor: 10 – 15 Tahun.
      -
      2. 🇰🇷 Korea Selatan (Pesawat FA-50)
      Model: Hybrid (Kredit KEXIM & Barter CPO 50%).
      Biaya: Management Fee sangat rendah (0,10% - 0,50%).
      -
      3. 🇬🇧 Inggris (Standar UKEF - Pesawat Hawk)
      Syarat: Wajib DP 15% (Standar OECD).
      Bunga: Stabil, mengikuti National Loans Fund.
      -
      4. 🇨🇳 China (LMS Batch 1)
      Model: 100% Kredit Ekspor (China Eximbank).
      Bunga: Sangat murah (3,5% Fixed).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun.
      -
      5. 🇵🇱 Polandia (Tank PT-91M)
      Model: DP 15% + Barter CPO (30-40%).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun cicilan.
      -
      6. 🇩🇪 Jerman (Kedah-Class)
      Model: Kredit Komersial dijamin negara (Euler Hermes).
      Pendana: Deutsche Bank & Konsorsium.
      -
      7. Kredit Sindikasi (Proyek LCS - 17 Kreditor/Hutang)
      Model: Konsorsium Bank Domestik/Intl (Skala Masif).
      Bunga: 6% (Saldo Menurun).
      Tenor: 15 Tahun (Akibat penundaan proyek).
      ------------------
      2026 PM says =
      MISKIN ...... 2026 = FREEZES PROCUREMENT
      -
      KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The procurement decisions of the Malaydeshn armed forces and the police linked to a corruption probed will be temporarily frozen until they fully comply with related rules, state media reported, citing Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.
      The suspension comes following allegations of bribery linked to army procurement projects, with the Malaydeshn Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) raiding several firms suspected of involvement in a bribery scheme and freezing six bank accounts belonging to a suspect and their family members.
      https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/malaydesh-freezes-army-police-procurement-decisions-linked-corruption-pm-says-2026-01-16/#:~:text=Malaydesh%20freezes%20army%20and%20police,Reuters
      -
      2026 PM BEKUKAN PENGADAAN =
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecL7_O1Wn1k
      ------------------
      2023 PM says =
      MISKIN ...... 2023 = CANCELLED 5 (FIVE) PROCUREMENT
      -
      KUALA LUMPUR:
      The defence ministry has 2023 = CANCELLED FIVE PROCUREMENT tenders for supplies, services and infrastructure projects. The cancellations were to avoid leakages in expenditure, and were in line with a policy of procurement through open tenders.
      “Mindef has also taken serious note of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s statement regarding the leakage in expenditure at the Budget 2023 dialogue on Tuesday,” it said in a statement today
      ----------------
      GEMPURWIRA14 Desember 2023 pukul 10.30
      Tahun depan 2024
      18 SPH
      12 HELIKOPTER CSAR
      50-60 KENDERAAN ARMOR
      3 KAPAL LMS BATCH 2
      -
      GEMPURWIRA14 Desember 2023 pukul 09.48
      Psssttttt..... 18 buah SPH beli CASH ya guys bukan HUTANG... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
      -
      GEMPURWIRA14 Desember 2023 pukul 13.23
      Alhamdulilah MALAYDESH shoping SPH CASH guys.... Kalis NGUTANG... 😎😎😎😎
      -
      GEMPURWIRA14 Desember 2023 pukul 08.40
      18 buah puan syukur beli CASH...
      dari NGUTANG yang di bebankan rakyat tanggung BEBAN HUTANG alutsista puluhan tahun hingga 2044... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      -
      SPH CAESAR =
      GEMPURWIRA 2 April 2022 pukul 19.36
      Wkwkwkwkkw.... MALAYDESH SHOPING SPH guys.... ORANG KAYA
      -
      SPH YAVUZ =
      GEMPURWIRA 18 April 2022 pukul 12.26
      SPH Masuk dalam aset terbaru ya guys... Shoping lagi. Wkwkkwkwkwkw
      -
      SPH EVA =
      GEMPURWIRA 14 September 2022 pukul 07.29
      Video Eva SPH yang di runding oleh MALAYDESH guys.... pengisian peluru Auto guys

      Hapus
    7. KLAIM CASH = HUTANG ASET MILITER
      -
      1. 🇹🇷 Turki (LMS Batch 2)
      Model: G2G (Antar Pemerintah) via SSB.
      Bunga: 4% – 6% (Fixed/OECD CIRR).
      Tenor: 10 – 15 Tahun.
      -
      2. 🇰🇷 Korea Selatan (Pesawat FA-50)
      Model: Hybrid (Kredit KEXIM & Barter CPO 50%).
      Biaya: Management Fee sangat rendah (0,10% - 0,50%).
      -
      3. 🇬🇧 Inggris (Standar UKEF - Pesawat Hawk)
      Syarat: Wajib DP 15% (Standar OECD).
      Bunga: Stabil, mengikuti National Loans Fund.
      -
      4. 🇨🇳 China (LMS Batch 1)
      Model: 100% Kredit Ekspor (China Eximbank).
      Bunga: Sangat murah (3,5% Fixed).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun.
      -
      5. 🇵🇱 Polandia (Tank PT-91M)
      Model: DP 15% + Barter CPO (30-40%).
      Tenor: 10 Tahun cicilan.
      -
      6. 🇩🇪 Jerman (Kedah-Class)
      Model: Kredit Komersial dijamin negara (Euler Hermes).
      Pendana: Deutsche Bank & Konsorsium.
      -
      7. Kredit Sindikasi (Proyek LCS - 17 Kreditor/Hutang)
      Model: Konsorsium Bank Domestik/Intl (Skala Masif).
      Bunga: 6% (Saldo Menurun).
      Tenor: 15 Tahun (Akibat penundaan proyek).
      ------------------
      2026 PM says =
      MISKIN ...... 2026 = FREEZES PROCUREMENT
      -
      KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 16 (Reuters) - The procurement decisions of the Malaydeshn armed forces and the police linked to a corruption probed will be temporarily frozen until they fully comply with related rules, state media reported, citing Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.
      The suspension comes following allegations of bribery linked to army procurement projects, with the Malaydeshn Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) raiding several firms suspected of involvement in a bribery scheme and freezing six bank accounts belonging to a suspect and their family members.
      https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/malaydesh-freezes-army-police-procurement-decisions-linked-corruption-pm-says-2026-01-16/#:~:text=Malaydesh%20freezes%20army%20and%20police,Reuters
      -
      2026 PM BEKUKAN PENGADAAN =
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecL7_O1Wn1k
      ------------------
      2023 PM says =
      MISKIN ...... 2023 = CANCELLED 5 (FIVE) PROCUREMENT
      -
      KUALA LUMPUR:
      The defence ministry has 2023 = CANCELLED FIVE PROCUREMENT tenders for supplies, services and infrastructure projects. The cancellations were to avoid leakages in expenditure, and were in line with a policy of procurement through open tenders.
      “Mindef has also taken serious note of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s statement regarding the leakage in expenditure at the Budget 2023 dialogue on Tuesday,” it said in a statement today
      ----------------
      GEMPURWIRA26 Juni 2025 pukul 10.06
      GORILLA MISKIN PENCURI BERAS MALAYDESH mulai Panik... 3 BUAH LCS ON THE WAY... 😎😎🇲🇾🇲🇾
      --------
      GEMPURWIRA26 Juni 2025 pukul 08.56
      PROGRAM LCS....😎😎😎😎🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
      1.LCS 1 - TURUN DI AIR
      2. LCS 2 - TURUN DI AIR
      3. LCS 3 - bentuk fizikal kapal sudah kelihatan
      --------
      MMW9 Mei 2025 pukul 08.32
      GEMPURWIRA9 Mei 2025 pukul 07.33
      LCS 2 sudah selamat diturunkan ke AIR...GORILLA makin menangis TERSAKITI....HAHAHAHAH
      https://www.facebook.com/reel/2131741567302653
      Alhamdulillah....
      Program kita jalan terus Bro....
      Lantak la apa KONOHA nak cakap dan nak HOAXkan...
      Kita jalan terus!!!
      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      --------
      MMW9 Mei 2025 pukul 08.35
      GEMPURWIRA9 Mei 2025 pukul 07.33
      LCS 2 sudah selamat diturunkan ke AIR...GORILLA makin menangis TERSAKITI....HAHAHAHAH
      https://www.facebook.com/reel/2131741567302653
      Aku kat Langkawi ni Bro... tengah tengok persediaan LIMA 2025.
      Tunggu LIMA 2025... banyak perancangan kita yang akan kita zahirkan.
      KITA JALAN TERUS!!!
      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      --------
      MMW9 Mei 2025 pukul 11.02
      KAMI JALAN TERUS BRO... JALAN TERUS!
      Kami peduli apa korang cakap....KAMI JALAN TERUS!
      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

      Hapus
    8. 2026 🦧GORILA MONKEY HANTAR =
      BERITA OKTOBER 2025
      BERITA SEPTEMBER 2025
      -------
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69%
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3%
      DEFISIT 3.8%
      -
      BERITA OKTOBER 2025 =
      🦧🦧GORILA-GEMPURWIRA13 Februari 2026 pukul 19.28
      “Garibaldi “ Kapal yang Lebih Banyak Membakar Uang daripada Bahan Bakar
      https://www.delikasia.com/headline-news/garibaldi-kapal-yang-lebih-banyak-membakar-uang-daripada-bahan-bakar
      -------
      BERITA SEPTEMBER 2025 =
      🐒MONKEY -MMW13 Februari 2026 pukul 16.27
      Kami tak la BODOH hutang Rp 7 Trilliun belanja beli Alutsista RONGSOK!.
      https://wartabanjar.com/2025/09/29/ngutang-rp-7-triliun-hanya-untuk-kapal-induk-rongsok-italia-indonesia-harusnya-belajar-dari-thailand
      -------
      BERITA SEPTEMBER 2025 =
      🐒MONKEY-MMW13 Februari 2026 pukul 19.37
      https://defensemirror.com/news/40265/Indonesia_Approves__450M_Deal_to_Take_over_Italy___s_Retired_Aircraft_Carrier__Report
      GRATIS? Memang IQ78!
      USD450M = Rp 9Trillion
      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      -------
      HIBAH KAPAL 1967 = The post stated that among his achievements in the MMEA were that he was the team leader for a suitability study on absorbing the US Coast Guard cutter – USCG Decisive. Checks on the US Coast Guard website showed that Decisive– a Reliance class cutter – was laid in 1967 and commissioned in 1968
      -------
      HIBAH KAPAL 1968 = USCGC Steadfast (WMEC-623) was a United States Coast Guard medium endurance cutter in commission for 56 years. Commissioned in 1968, Steadfast was home ported in St. Petersburg, Florida for her first 24 years of service...
      ===============
      ===============
      ===============
      BERITA FEBRUARI 2026
      BERITA FEBRUARI 2026
      BERITA FEBRUARI 2026
      HIBAH KAPAL INDUK
      HIBAH KAPAL INDUK
      HIBAH KAPAL INDUK
      -
      Sumber Berita Lain =
      1. Kemhan RI kapal induk giuseppe garibaldi hibah dari italia (Feb 13, 2026).
      https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2026/02/13/14294341/kemhan-ri-kapal-induk-giuseppe-garibaldi-hibah-dari-italia
      -
      2. ANTARA News (English) – “RI to receive its first aircraft carrier from Italy grant: Official” (Feb 13, 2026). Artikel ini menegaskan bahwa Giuseppe Garibaldi adalah hibah dari pemerintah Italia, namun Indonesia tetap menyiapkan anggaran untuk retrofit dan penyesuaian operasional.
      -
      3. Jakarta Globe (English) – “Indonesia Moves Closer to Operating Its First Aircraft Carrier” (Feb 13, 2026). Menyebut bahwa Kemhan bersama TNI sudah menyiapkan calon awak kapal dan pelatihan untuk mengoperasikan Giuseppe Garibaldi.
      -
      4. Jawa Pos (Bahasa Indonesia) – “Kemhan Pastikan Kapal Induk Giuseppe Garibaldi untuk TNI AL Hibah dari Pemerintah Italia” (Feb 13, 2026). Menyebut retrofit akan dilakukan setelah administrasi hibah selesai
      -
      MODERNISASI DAN PERAWATAN ITS GIUSEPPE GARIBALDI:
      -------
      MODERNISASI BESAR (MLU 2003–2004)
      1. Wikipedia mencatat bahwa setelah MLU 2003, bobot penuh kapal meningkat menjadi 14.150 ton, menandakan adanya upgrade besar pada sistem dan struktur. Modernisasi ini mencakup CMS, radar, sensor, serta perbaikan kelistrikan dan lambung .
      -
      2. Radar Malioboro menyoroti bahwa kapal ini memang sudah mengalami modernisasi besar sebelum akhirnya dipensiunkan, sehingga tidak lagi membawa teknologi mentah era 1980-an .
      -------
      LIFE EXTENSION / REFURBISHMENT (2021–2022)
      1. TribunNews dan DIP Institute melaporkan bahwa sebelum dipensiunkan pada Oktober 2024, kapal menjalani perawatan besar (refurbishment) untuk memastikan mesin, propulsi, dan lambung tetap siap pakai. Hal ini dilakukan agar kapal tetap layak tempur hingga akhir masa tugasnya .
      -
      2. Kompasiana juga menyinggung bahwa kondisi kapal saat ditawarkan ke Indonesia masih operasional karena adanya perawatan besar menjelang pensiun .
      -------
      📌 Kesimpulan:
      -
      1. MLU 2003–2004 → fokus pada upgrade teknologi tempur (CMS, radar, sensor, kelistrikan, lambung).
      -
      2. Life Extension 2021–2022 → fokus pada refurbishment fisik (mesin, propulsi, lambung) agar tetap siap operasional

      Hapus
    9. 2026 🦧GORILA MONKEY HANTAR =
      BERITA OKTOBER 2025
      BERITA SEPTEMBER 2025
      -------
      MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
      GOV. DEBT : 69%
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3%
      DEFISIT 3.8%
      -
      BERITA OKTOBER 2025 =
      🦧🦧GORILA-GEMPURWIRA13 Februari 2026 pukul 19.28
      “Garibaldi “ Kapal yang Lebih Banyak Membakar Uang daripada Bahan Bakar
      https://www.delikasia.com/headline-news/garibaldi-kapal-yang-lebih-banyak-membakar-uang-daripada-bahan-bakar
      -------
      BERITA SEPTEMBER 2025 =
      🐒MONKEY -MMW13 Februari 2026 pukul 16.27
      Kami tak la BODOH hutang Rp 7 Trilliun belanja beli Alutsista RONGSOK!.
      https://wartabanjar.com/2025/09/29/ngutang-rp-7-triliun-hanya-untuk-kapal-induk-rongsok-italia-indonesia-harusnya-belajar-dari-thailand
      -------
      BERITA SEPTEMBER 2025 =
      🐒MONKEY-MMW13 Februari 2026 pukul 19.37
      https://defensemirror.com/news/40265/Indonesia_Approves__450M_Deal_to_Take_over_Italy___s_Retired_Aircraft_Carrier__Report
      GRATIS? Memang IQ78!
      USD450M = Rp 9Trillion
      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      -------
      HIBAH KAPAL 1967 = The post stated that among his achievements in the MMEA were that he was the team leader for a suitability study on absorbing the US Coast Guard cutter – USCG Decisive. Checks on the US Coast Guard website showed that Decisive– a Reliance class cutter – was laid in 1967 and commissioned in 1968
      -------
      HIBAH KAPAL 1968 = USCGC Steadfast (WMEC-623) was a United States Coast Guard medium endurance cutter in commission for 56 years. Commissioned in 1968, Steadfast was home ported in St. Petersburg, Florida for her first 24 years of service...
      ===============
      ===============
      ===============
      BERITA FEBRUARI 2026
      BERITA FEBRUARI 2026
      BERITA FEBRUARI 2026
      HIBAH KAPAL INDUK
      HIBAH KAPAL INDUK
      HIBAH KAPAL INDUK
      -
      Sumber Berita Lain =
      1. Kemhan RI kapal induk giuseppe garibaldi hibah dari italia (Feb 13, 2026).
      https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2026/02/13/14294341/kemhan-ri-kapal-induk-giuseppe-garibaldi-hibah-dari-italia
      -
      2. ANTARA News (English) – “RI to receive its first aircraft carrier from Italy grant: Official” (Feb 13, 2026). Artikel ini menegaskan bahwa Giuseppe Garibaldi adalah hibah dari pemerintah Italia, namun Indonesia tetap menyiapkan anggaran untuk retrofit dan penyesuaian operasional.
      -
      3. Jakarta Globe (English) – “Indonesia Moves Closer to Operating Its First Aircraft Carrier” (Feb 13, 2026). Menyebut bahwa Kemhan bersama TNI sudah menyiapkan calon awak kapal dan pelatihan untuk mengoperasikan Giuseppe Garibaldi.
      -
      4. Jawa Pos (Bahasa Indonesia) – “Kemhan Pastikan Kapal Induk Giuseppe Garibaldi untuk TNI AL Hibah dari Pemerintah Italia” (Feb 13, 2026). Menyebut retrofit akan dilakukan setelah administrasi hibah selesai
      -
      MODERNISASI DAN PERAWATAN ITS GIUSEPPE GARIBALDI:
      -------
      MODERNISASI BESAR (MLU 2003–2004)
      1. Wikipedia mencatat bahwa setelah MLU 2003, bobot penuh kapal meningkat menjadi 14.150 ton, menandakan adanya upgrade besar pada sistem dan struktur. Modernisasi ini mencakup CMS, radar, sensor, serta perbaikan kelistrikan dan lambung .
      -
      2. Radar Malioboro menyoroti bahwa kapal ini memang sudah mengalami modernisasi besar sebelum akhirnya dipensiunkan, sehingga tidak lagi membawa teknologi mentah era 1980-an .
      -------
      LIFE EXTENSION / REFURBISHMENT (2021–2022)
      1. TribunNews dan DIP Institute melaporkan bahwa sebelum dipensiunkan pada Oktober 2024, kapal menjalani perawatan besar (refurbishment) untuk memastikan mesin, propulsi, dan lambung tetap siap pakai. Hal ini dilakukan agar kapal tetap layak tempur hingga akhir masa tugasnya .
      -
      2. Kompasiana juga menyinggung bahwa kondisi kapal saat ditawarkan ke Indonesia masih operasional karena adanya perawatan besar menjelang pensiun .
      -------
      📌 Kesimpulan:
      -
      1. MLU 2003–2004 → fokus pada upgrade teknologi tempur (CMS, radar, sensor, kelistrikan, lambung).
      -
      2. Life Extension 2021–2022 → fokus pada refurbishment fisik (mesin, propulsi, lambung) agar tetap siap operasional

      Hapus
  38. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    -
    TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
    -
    2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
    Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
    Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
    -
    2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
    Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
    -
    2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
    Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
    Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
    -
    2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
    Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
    Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
    -
    2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
    Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
    Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
    -
    2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
    Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
    Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
    -
    2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
    Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
    Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
    -
    2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
    Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
    -
    2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
    Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
    Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
    -
    2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
    Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
    -
    2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
    Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
    Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
    -
    2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
    Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
    ________________________________________
    2026 FREEZES PROCUREMENT - 2023 CANCELLED PROCUREMENT
    FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEBT = PER PEOPLE : RM 36,139
    HOUSEHOLD DEBT = PER PEOPLE : RM 45,859.
    GOV + HOUSEHOLD = PER PEOPLE : RM 81,998
    ---------------
    1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
    • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
    • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
    • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
    2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
    1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
    Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
    --------------
    1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
    • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
    • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
    • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
    2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
    Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang

    BalasHapus
  39. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    -
    TIMELINE "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
    -
    2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
    Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
    Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
    -
    2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
    Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
    -
    2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
    Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
    Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
    -
    2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
    Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
    Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
    -
    2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
    Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
    Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
    -
    2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
    Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
    Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
    -
    2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
    Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
    Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
    -
    2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
    Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
    -
    2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
    Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
    Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
    -
    2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
    Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
    -
    2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
    Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
    Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
    -
    2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
    Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan
    ________________________________________
    5x GANTI PM = AKAN
    6x GANTI MENHAN = AKAN
    MALAYDESH : NOL (KOSONG)
    -
    2025 = 84,3% DARI GDP
    MISKIN KLAIM LUNAS 2053 = GAGAL (NAMBAH DEBT)
    -
    PERDANA MENTERI = TIDAK BAYAR TERTUNGGAK
    MENTERI PERTAHANAN = KEKANGAN KEWANGAN
    97.000 EKSODUS = 2018-2026 HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
    --------------------------
    SALAM NGEMIS F18 KUWAIT 2025-2017=
    5x GANTI PERDANA MENTERI
    5x GANTI MENTERI PERTAHANAN
    -
    SALAM MANGKRAK LCS 2025-2011 =
    5x GANTI PERDANA MENTERI
    6x GANTI MENTERI PERTAHANAN
    -
    MEMBUAL SPH 2025-2016 =
    5x GANTI PERDANA MENTERI
    5x GANTI MENTERI PERTAHANAN
    -
    2026 = ZONK = NGEMIS MEMBUAL MISKIN

    BalasHapus
  40. Pantesan PETROL DIESEL NAIK
    lahh no.2 NGUTANG SEKAWASAN gaesz haha!😝😋😝

    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    Ingat yaaa tangga NO.2 Utang terbanyak seASEAN milik kl haha!😋😋😋
    Hutang Isi Rumah | Malaysia tangga ke-2 di Asia Tenggara
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=bTeEGLY_eQs&pp=ygUPSHV0YW5nIG1hbGF5c2lh0gcJCR4Bo7VqN5tD

    BalasHapus
  41. Kita lihat seberapa lama Menteri kewangan INDIANESIA mampu menahan Subsidi minyak... 🔥🔥🤣🤣



    Dolar Tembus Rp17.000/US$, Kinerja Rupiah Masih Berdarah-darah

    https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20260404032248-128-723793/dolar-tembus-rp17000-us--kinerja-rupiah-masih-berdarah-darah

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. BABU KAUM WANITA......
      MMW 21 April 2025 pukul 10.48
      YUPP tahun 2025 kami negara MISKIN
      Sementara pendapatan Isteri saya pula dua kali lipat pendapatan saya. Household income kami secara kasar sebulan tahun 2025 = RM25.000 sebulan..........
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
      • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
      Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
      3️⃣ Ringkasan dalam tabel
      Periode Total Utang (RM Triliun) Penduduk (Jiwa) Utang per Orang (RM) Kenaikan per Orang (RM)
      Akhir 2024 1.25 35,977,838 34,735 –
      Juni 2025 1.30 35,977,838 36,139 +1,404
      4️⃣ Analisis
      • Dalam 6 bulan pertama 2025, utang per penduduk naik sekitar RM 1,404.
      • Kenaikan ini setara dengan +4% dibanding akhir 2024.
      • Artinya, setiap warga Malaydesh secara rata-rata “menanggung” tambahan utang sekitar RM 234 per bulan selama periode tersebut.
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
      • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang
      3️⃣ Ringkasan dalam tabel
      Periode Total Utang Rumah Tangga (RM Triliun) Penduduk (Jiwa) Utang per Orang (RM)
      Maret 2025 1.65 35,977,838 45,859
      4️⃣ Analisis
      • Setiap penduduk Malaydesh, secara rata-rata, “menanggung” utang rumah tangga sekitar RM 45,859.
      • Angka ini lebih tinggi dibanding utang per kapita pemerintah federal yang kita hitung sebelumnya (sekitar RM 36 ribu per orang).
      • Jika digabungkan (utang pemerintah + utang rumah tangga), beban utang total per kapita bisa mendekati RM 82 ribu.
      Rasio 84.3% dari PDB menunjukkan bahwa utang rumah tangga Malaydesh relatif tinggi dibanding ukuran ekonominya, yang dapat memengaruhi daya beli dan risiko keuangan rumah tangga jika suku bunga
      --------------------
      GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
      Federal Government Debt
      • End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
      • End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
      • Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
      Household Debt
      2025 : RM1.73 trillion, or 85.8% of GDP
      --------------------------
      MY = HUTANG > TAS, JET PRIBADI, FILM, PROPERTI, KOTA HANTU
      SG = HUTANG > ASSET
      TH = HUTANG > ASSET
      PH = HUTANG > ASSET
      VN = HUTANG > ASSET
      ID = HUTANG > ASSET
      ============
      SKANDAL 1MDB = USD 4,5 MILIAR
      Skandal 1MDB dan kegagalan proyek Forest City menggambarkan dua sisi kelam dari pengelolaan dana besar di Malaydesh. Dana investasi 1MDB sebesar USD 4,5 miliar diselewengkan oleh pejabat tinggi dan rekanan mereka untuk membeli barang mewah, properti elit, karya seni, jet pribadi, dan bahkan mendanai film Hollywood. Tokoh-tokoh seperti Najib Razak, Jho Low, dan Riza Aziz terlibat dalam jaringan pencucian uang lintas negara yang menyebabkan kerugian besar dan memicu penyitaan aset oleh otoritas internasional. Skandal ini menjadi simbol korupsi global yang merusak kepercayaan publik dan reputasi negara.
      --------------
      FOREST CITY = KOTA HANTU USD 100 MILLIAR
      Forest City yang digadang-gadang sebagai kota futuristik senilai USD 100 miliar berubah menjadi kota hantu akibat krisis keuangan pengembang, pandemi, dan minimnya minat pasar. Proyek ini gagal memenuhi janji pembangunan ekonomi dan sosial, menyebabkan kerugian investasi, infrastruktur terbengkalai, serta ketimpangan sosial di masyarakat lokal. Kedua kasus ini menunjukkan pentingnya transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan perencanaan yang realistis dalam pengelolaan mega proyek dan dana publik agar tidak berujung pada kegagalan dan penderitaan rakyat

      Hapus
    2. BABU KAUM WANITA......
      MMW 21 April 2025 pukul 10.48
      YUPP tahun 2025 kami negara MISKIN
      Sementara pendapatan Isteri saya pula dua kali lipat pendapatan saya. Household income kami secara kasar sebulan tahun 2025 = RM25.000 sebulan..........
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
      • Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
      Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
      3️⃣ Ringkasan dalam tabel
      Periode Total Utang (RM Triliun) Penduduk (Jiwa) Utang per Orang (RM) Kenaikan per Orang (RM)
      Akhir 2024 1.25 35,977,838 34,735 –
      Juni 2025 1.30 35,977,838 36,139 +1,404
      4️⃣ Analisis
      • Dalam 6 bulan pertama 2025, utang per penduduk naik sekitar RM 1,404.
      • Kenaikan ini setara dengan +4% dibanding akhir 2024.
      • Artinya, setiap warga Malaydesh secara rata-rata “menanggung” tambahan utang sekitar RM 234 per bulan selama periode tersebut.
      --------------------
      1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
      • Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
      • Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
      • Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
      2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
      Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang
      3️⃣ Ringkasan dalam tabel
      Periode Total Utang Rumah Tangga (RM Triliun) Penduduk (Jiwa) Utang per Orang (RM)
      Maret 2025 1.65 35,977,838 45,859
      4️⃣ Analisis
      • Setiap penduduk Malaydesh, secara rata-rata, “menanggung” utang rumah tangga sekitar RM 45,859.
      • Angka ini lebih tinggi dibanding utang per kapita pemerintah federal yang kita hitung sebelumnya (sekitar RM 36 ribu per orang).
      • Jika digabungkan (utang pemerintah + utang rumah tangga), beban utang total per kapita bisa mendekati RM 82 ribu.
      Rasio 84.3% dari PDB menunjukkan bahwa utang rumah tangga Malaydesh relatif tinggi dibanding ukuran ekonominya, yang dapat memengaruhi daya beli dan risiko keuangan rumah tangga jika suku bunga
      --------------------
      GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
      HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
      Federal Government Debt
      • End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
      • End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
      • Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
      Household Debt
      2025 : RM1.73 trillion, or 85.8% of GDP
      --------------------------
      MY = HUTANG > TAS, JET PRIBADI, FILM, PROPERTI, KOTA HANTU
      SG = HUTANG > ASSET
      TH = HUTANG > ASSET
      PH = HUTANG > ASSET
      VN = HUTANG > ASSET
      ID = HUTANG > ASSET
      ============
      SKANDAL 1MDB = USD 4,5 MILIAR
      Skandal 1MDB dan kegagalan proyek Forest City menggambarkan dua sisi kelam dari pengelolaan dana besar di Malaydesh. Dana investasi 1MDB sebesar USD 4,5 miliar diselewengkan oleh pejabat tinggi dan rekanan mereka untuk membeli barang mewah, properti elit, karya seni, jet pribadi, dan bahkan mendanai film Hollywood. Tokoh-tokoh seperti Najib Razak, Jho Low, dan Riza Aziz terlibat dalam jaringan pencucian uang lintas negara yang menyebabkan kerugian besar dan memicu penyitaan aset oleh otoritas internasional. Skandal ini menjadi simbol korupsi global yang merusak kepercayaan publik dan reputasi negara.
      --------------
      FOREST CITY = KOTA HANTU USD 100 MILLIAR
      Forest City yang digadang-gadang sebagai kota futuristik senilai USD 100 miliar berubah menjadi kota hantu akibat krisis keuangan pengembang, pandemi, dan minimnya minat pasar. Proyek ini gagal memenuhi janji pembangunan ekonomi dan sosial, menyebabkan kerugian investasi, infrastruktur terbengkalai, serta ketimpangan sosial di masyarakat lokal. Kedua kasus ini menunjukkan pentingnya transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan perencanaan yang realistis dalam pengelolaan mega proyek dan dana publik agar tidak berujung pada kegagalan dan penderitaan rakyat

      Hapus
    3. INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
      -
      MALAYDESH.......
      F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
      JF17 = PRANK
      RAFALE = PRANK
      TYPHOON = PRANK
      GRIPEN = PRANK
      TEJAS = PRANK
      MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
      FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
      ________________________________________
      KFH EXIT BANKRUPT = 🦧GORILA NGEMIS F18 KUWAIT
      KFH EXIT BANKRUPT = 🦧GORILA NGEMIS F18 KUWAIT
      KFH EXIT BANKRUPT = 🦧GORILA NGEMIS F18 KUWAIT
      -------------------------
      MALAYDESH 's first foreign Islamic bank Kuwait Finance House (MALAYDESH ) Bhd (KFH MALAYDESH ) is exiting MALAYDESH after 19 years of operation.
      In a statement today, the group said Kuwait Finance House (MALAYDESH ) Berhad (KFHMB) will be closed, aligned with its international business strategic review to focus and expand its regional market in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Middle East
      ________________________________________
      F18 2021-2025
      PEJABAT MALAYDESH = MEMBUAL
      BERUK MALAYDESH = MEMBUAL
      -
      🗓️ 2021: Pernyataan Minat & Evaluasi Awal
      Minat Resmi: Malaydesh menyatakan ketertarikan resmi terhadap 33 unit Hornet Kuwait.
      Kondisi: Pejabat menilai pesawat ini sebagai solusi cepat (stop-gap measure) yang sangat layak untuk meningkatkan kekuatan udara TUDM tanpa menunggu produksi pesawat baru yang lama.
      Kompatibilitas: Penekanan bahwa pesawat ini cocok karena TUDM sudah memiliki infrastruktur perawatan dan pilot yang berpengalaman dengan platform Hornet.
      -
      🗓️ 2022 - 2023: Diplomasi & Penilaian Teknis
      Kunjungan Teknis: Delegasi TUDM melakukan penilaian mendalam di Kuwait.
      Hasil Evaluasi: Pejabat militer melaporkan bahwa pesawat dirawat dengan standar tinggi oleh Angkatan Udara Kuwait, memastikan sistem avionik dan badan pesawat dalam kondisi sangat baik.
      -
      🗓️ 2024: Penegasan Kualitas (Data Jam Terbang)
      Pernyataan Menhan: Menteri Pertahanan, Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin, memberikan detail teknis kepada publik dan parlemen.
      Data Jam Terbang: Ditegaskan bahwa pesawat hanya memiliki 1.500 hingga 3.000 jam terbang.
      Justifikasi: Angka ini jauh di bawah batas service life (6.000-8.000 jam), sehingga secara operasional pesawat ini masih dianggap sangat "muda".
      -
      🗓️ 2025 (Januari - Agustus): Tahap Negosiasi Akhir
      Kesiapan Tempur: Pejabat militer terus memberikan testimoni bahwa pesawat dalam kondisi siap tempur dan akan langsung meningkatkan kesiapan ruang udara Malaydesh segera setelah tiba.
      Agustus 2025: Meskipun kondisi fisik pesawat diakui sangat bagus, Malaydesh resmi membatalkan rencana akuisisi karena ketidakpastian jadwal pengiriman dari pihak Kuwait yang masih menunggu pesawat baru mereka tiba.
      ________________________________________
      PEJABAT DAN BERUK = MEMBUAL
      -
      pernyataan pejabat Malaydesh mengenai F/A-18 Hornet Kuwait (2021–2025):
      -
      2021 (Solusi Instan): Pemerintah menyatakan minat pada 33 unit Hornet sebagai solusi cepat (stop-gap) karena kompatibel dengan infrastruktur perawatan dan pilot TUDM yang sudah ada.
      -
      2022–2023 (Kondisi Prima): Hasil inspeksi langsung delegasi TUDM ke Kuwait mengonfirmasi bahwa pesawat dirawat dengan standar tinggi, serta memiliki sistem avionik dan rangka (airframe) yang masih prima.
      -
      2024 (Jam Terbang Rendah): Menhan Mohamed Khaled Nordin menegaskan di Parlemen bahwa pesawat masih "sangat muda" dengan 1.500–3.000 jam terbang, jauh di bawah batas usia pakai 6.000–8.000 jam.
      -
      2025 (Siap Tempur): Pejabat militer menyatakan pesawat dalam kondisi siap tempur (combat ready).
      ________________________________________
      GEMPURWIRA26 Agustus 2025 pukul 18.13
      pasti rasa sedihkan GORILLA MISKIN..... yang Program F18 KUWAIT ON terusssss.....HAHAHAHHA

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      PEKANBARU - KL : 291 KM
      PONTIANAK - SERAWAK : 498 KM
      -
      INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
      -
      MALAYDESH.......
      F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
      JF17 = PRANK
      RAFALE = PRANK
      TYPHOON = PRANK
      GRIPEN = PRANK
      TEJAS = PRANK
      MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
      FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
      ________________________________________
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      -
      2005: Prank China (KS-1A)
      Najib Razak menyatakan Malaydesh setuju secara prinsip membeli rudal jarak menengah KS-1A dari China dengan imbalan transfer teknologi. Hasil: Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga saat ini.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Malaydesh dilaporkan mempersempit pilihan ke Dassault Rafale untuk pengadaan 18 jet tempur senilai USD 2 miliar. Hasil: Proyek ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) di DSA 2016 untuk 20 unit artileri Caesar 155mm. Hasil: Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; Malaydesh akhirnya memilih unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      “The MALAYDESH government has shown interest in buying the JF-17 Thunder aircraft from Pakistan but the deal is yet to be finalized,” a senior Pakistan Ministry of Defense Production official told Arab News. Hasil: Malaydesh tiada akusisi jet tersebut.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim bahwa kontrak kapal MRSS akan ditandatangani Agustus 2018. Hasil: Hingga saat ini, kontrak tersebut tidak pernah terealisasi dengan PT PAL.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Malaydesh mengidentifikasi Tejas sebagai kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut. Hasil: Malaydesh justru memilih FA-50 Block 20 dari Korea Selatan pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Kemenhan Malaydesh meninjau ulang rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm setelah sebelumnya dikabarkan akan dibeli. Hasil: Dibatalkan/diganti dengan sistem lain.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Malaydesh diharapkan menyelesaikan kesepakatan untuk pasokan EVA 155mm. Hasil: Senasib dengan Yavuz, tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      =
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Sembilan kendaraan IAG Guardian yang dikirim untuk misi PBB (UNIFIL) dinyatakan tidak memenuhi persyaratan operasional, berujung pada sanksi pemotongan biaya operasional.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Black Hawk
      Ini menjadi salah satu "prank" terbesar baru-baru ini. Malaydesh berencana menyewa empat helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari perusahaan lokal Aerotree Defence & Services untuk menggantikan helikopter Nuri yang sudah tua.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Kuwait - Jet Tempur F/A-18 Hornet
      Malaydesh menunjukkan ketertarikan kuat untuk membeli jet tempur F/A-18 Hornet bekas milik Angkatan Udara Kuwait untuk menambah kekuatan udara mereka secara instan.
      -.
      2026 Pembekuan Pengadaan Massal
      Kejadian: Pada awal 2026, PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan semua keputusan pengadaan militer karena adanya penyelidikan dugaan korupsi dan kartel dalam kementerian pertahanan. Ini berdampak pada rencana-rencana yang sedang dibahas sepanjang 2024 dan 2025.
      ________________________________________
      DIBATALKAN/CANCELLED
      -
      F/A 18C/D Hornet bekas Kuwait (2025–2026)
      Dibatalkan resmi oleh Kabinet Malaydesh pada Februari 2026 setelah evaluasi teknis RMAF menunjukkan masalah ketersediaan, logistik, dan biaya jangka panjang.
      -
      UH 60 Blackhawk (1990 an)
      Rencana mengganti helikopter Nuri dengan Blackhawk tidak diteruskan karena biaya tinggi dan faktor politik/industri. Malaydesh akhirnya memilih EC725 Cougar/H225M sebagai pengganti.
      -
      MRCA (Multi Role Combat Aircraft, 2010 an)
      Program besar untuk mengganti MiG 29 dengan Rafale/Eurofighter/Gripen dibatalkan/ditunda berulang kali karena kekangan fiskal. Malaydesh akhirnya memilih FA 50 Block 20 (2023) sebagai solusi interim.
      -
      Sea Skua (rudal anti kapal tambahan, 2000 an)
      Upgrade rudal untuk helikopter Lynx tidak diteruskan, fokus bergeser ke sistem baru.


      Hapus
    5. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      ________________________________________
      FENOMENA "PRANK" POLITIK DALAM PERTAHANAN
      Daftar panjang "prank" dari tahun 2005 hingga 2026 menunjukkan adanya ketidakselarasan antara ambisi militer dan realitas anggaran:
      -
      1. Efek Domino Pembatalan: Mulai dari rudal China (2005) hingga jet tempur Kuwait (2025), setiap pembatalan menurunkan daya gentar (deterrence effect) negara tersebut di kawasan.
      -
      2. Kasus FA-50 & Hambatan AS: Meskipun FA-50 berhasil dikontrak, ketergantungan pada komponen AS (mesin/radar) menjadi titik lemah jika terjadi gesekan diplomasi, yang bisa berujung pada pemblokiran.
      -
      3. Isu Korupsi & Kartel (2026): Pengumuman pembekuan pengadaan oleh PM Anwar Ibrahim menunjukkan bahwa masalah bukan hanya soal uang, tetapi juga integritas sistem pengadaan yang menghambat modernisasi.
      ________________________________________
      KRONOLOGI "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan.
      ====================
      ====================
      DISIPLIN FISKAL VS. SPIRAL UTANG
      -
      1. Kesehatan Fiskal & Utang
      Indonesia: Kondisi Sehat. Utang pemerintah terjaga di ±40% PDB (limit UU 60%) dan utang rumah tangga sangat rendah (16%).
      Malaydesh: Kondisi Kritis. Utang pemerintah tembus 69% PDB (melampaui limit 65%) dengan utang rumah tangga ekstrem (84,3% - 85,8%).
      -
      2. Dampak Militer (Status Zonk/Mangkrak)
      Krisis keuangan menyebabkan lumpuhnya belanja modal pertahanan Malaydesh:
      1. MRCA (Pesawat Tempur): Vakum pengadaan sejak 2017.
      2. LCS (Kapal Perang): Proyek mangkrak sejak 2011.
      3. SPH & MRSS: Tanpa kepastian sejak 2016.
      4. F-18 Kuwait (2026): Resmi dibatalkan karena kendala biaya dan logistik.

      Hapus
    6. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      ________________________________________
      1. Status Pengadaan & Akuisisi Alutsista
      Indonesia (Proaktif & Nyata):
      Realisasi Kontrak Rafale: Komitmen penuh terhadap 42 unit Dassault Rafale (telah masuk fase aktivasi kontrak).
      Investasi KAAN : Keterlibatan aktif dalam pengembangan jet tempur generasi 5 bersama Turki.
      Investasi KF-21 Boramae: Keterlibatan aktif dalam pengembangan jet tempur generasi 4.5 bersama Korea Selatan.
      -
      Malaydesh (Reaktif & Stagnan):
      Ketergantungan Alutsista Tua: Masih mengandalkan armada F-18 Hornet dan Su-30MKM tanpa kepastian pengganti.
      Vakum MRCA: Program Multi-Role Combat Aircraft tidak mengalami kemajuan nyata sejak 2017.
      Krisis Identitas: Sering berganti-ganti kandidat (dari Rafale, Typhoon, hingga Tejas) namun berakhir tanpa tanda tangan kontrak formal.
      ________________________________________
      2. Skala Prioritas & Manajemen Fiskal
      Indonesia (Disiplin & Stabil):
      Disiplin Fiskal: Menjaga rasio utang dan anggaran untuk memastikan termin pembayaran alutsista baru berjalan lancar.
      Kepastian Anggaran: Alokasi dana difokuskan pada pembelian unit baru untuk menjamin usia pakai yang panjang.
      -
      Malaydesh (Spiral Utang & Spekulatif):
      Skema Sewa (Leasing): Terjebak pada rencana penyewaan helikopter (seperti kasus Black Hawk) yang seringkali tidak efektif secara biaya.
      Berburu Barang Bekas: Upaya mengakuisisi jet bekas (Hornet Kuwait) yang seringkali gagal karena kendala teknis, logistik, atau izin pihak ketiga.
      ________________________________________
      3. Visi Jangka Panjang & Industri Dalam Negeri
      Indonesia (Kemandirian Strategis):
      Penguatan Industri Lokal: Memaksimalkan peran PT PAL (kapal), PT DI (pesawat), dan PT Pindad (kendaraan tempur/artileri).
      Transfer Teknologi (ToT): Setiap pembelian besar diwajibkan menyertakan skema ToT untuk memperkuat teknisi dalam negeri.
      -
      Malaydesh (Kegagalan Kolaborasi):
      Proyek Mangkrak: Kegagalan manajemen pada proyek besar seperti LCS (kapal perang) yang terbengkalai bertahun-tahun.
      Wacana Kolaborasi: Banyak rencana kerja sama (seperti MRSS dengan PT PAL) yang hanya berakhir di atas kertas tanpa realisasi fisik.
      ________________________________________
      4. Keandalan Operasional di Lapangan
      Indonesia: Fokus pada pembaruan teknologi terkini (Radar AESA, persenjataan presisi) melalui pesawat baru (Rafale/KAAN/KF21).
      -
      Malaydesh: Menghadapi risiko penurunan kesiapan tempur (readiness) akibat armada tua dan kegagalan sistem pendukung
      ________________________________________
      INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
      -
      MALAYDESH.......
      F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
      JF17 = PRANK
      RAFALE = PRANK
      TYPHOON = PRANK
      GRIPEN = PRANK
      TEJAS = PRANK
      MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
      FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
      -
      GEMPURWIRA26 Agustus 2025 pukul 18.13
      pasti rasa sedihkan GORILLA MISKIN..... yang Program F18 KUWAIT ON terusssss.....HAHAHAHHA
      -
      GEMPURWIRA8 Oktober 2024 pukul 09.49
      horeyyyyy...F18 come to PAPA
      -
      GEMPURWIRA4 Maret 2023 pukul 07.40
      Mantap...... Sokongan penuh pada penambahan pesawat F18....
      Yang hanya mampu shoping drone kecil tu tepi sikit ya.... Hahhahahha
      -
      sandstorm719 Desember 2022 pukul 06.58
      Ia yg penting lgi bs terbang engak ada masalah loh...
      -
      GEMPURWIRA 23 Desember 2021 12.33
      Nampaknya MALAYDESH sudah berhubung dengan pihak kuwait.. Semoga BERJAYA...
      ________________________________________
      🤣ON TERUS : BATAL = SIPRI LEMBAR KOSONG🤣

      Hapus
  42. APBN diprediksi hanya mampu menahan kenaikan BBM 'dalam hitungan minggu'

    https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c3r39z20j42o

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F

      -
      MALAYDESH.......
      F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
      JF17 = PRANK
      RAFALE = PRANK
      TYPHOON = PRANK
      GRIPEN = PRANK
      TEJAS = PRANK
      MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
      FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
      ________________________________________
      F18 2021-2025
      PEJABAT MALAYDESH = MEMBUAL
      BERUK MALAYDESH = MEMBUAL
      -
      🗓️ 2021: Pernyataan Minat & Evaluasi Awal
      Minat Resmi: Malaydesh menyatakan ketertarikan resmi terhadap 33 unit Hornet Kuwait.
      Kondisi: Pejabat menilai pesawat ini sebagai solusi cepat (stop-gap measure) yang sangat layak untuk meningkatkan kekuatan udara TUDM tanpa menunggu produksi pesawat baru yang lama.
      Kompatibilitas: Penekanan bahwa pesawat ini cocok karena TUDM sudah memiliki infrastruktur perawatan dan pilot yang berpengalaman dengan platform Hornet.
      -
      🗓️ 2022 - 2023: Diplomasi & Penilaian Teknis
      Kunjungan Teknis: Delegasi TUDM melakukan penilaian mendalam di Kuwait.
      Hasil Evaluasi: Pejabat militer melaporkan bahwa pesawat dirawat dengan standar tinggi oleh Angkatan Udara Kuwait, memastikan sistem avionik dan badan pesawat dalam kondisi sangat baik.
      -
      🗓️ 2024: Penegasan Kualitas (Data Jam Terbang)
      Pernyataan Menhan: Menteri Pertahanan, Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin, memberikan detail teknis kepada publik dan parlemen.
      Data Jam Terbang: Ditegaskan bahwa pesawat hanya memiliki 1.500 hingga 3.000 jam terbang.
      Justifikasi: Angka ini jauh di bawah batas service life (6.000-8.000 jam), sehingga secara operasional pesawat ini masih dianggap sangat "muda".
      -
      🗓️ 2025 (Januari - Agustus): Tahap Negosiasi Akhir
      Kesiapan Tempur: Pejabat militer terus memberikan testimoni bahwa pesawat dalam kondisi siap tempur dan akan langsung meningkatkan kesiapan ruang udara Malaydesh segera setelah tiba.
      Agustus 2025: Meskipun kondisi fisik pesawat diakui sangat bagus, Malaydesh resmi membatalkan rencana akuisisi karena ketidakpastian jadwal pengiriman dari pihak Kuwait yang masih menunggu pesawat baru mereka tiba.
      ________________________________________
      🗓️2026 = CANCELLED F18
      Sumber Berita Utama
      New Straits Times (NST): Laporan berjudul "Govt scraps plan to acquire Kuwait's used F/A-18 Hornets" yang diterbitkan pada 26 Februari 2026.
      Bernama: Kantor berita nasional Malaydesh yang melaporkan penggulungan perdebatan tingkat komite RUU Perbekalan Tambahan di Dewan Rakyat.
      Militarnyi & Defense Blog: Portal berita pertahanan internasional yang merangkum keputusan pemerintah Malaydesh berdasarkan laporan teknis dari TUDM.
      -
      Detail Konfirmasi Resmi
      Narasumber: Wakil Menteri Pertahanan Malaydesh, Adly Zahari.
      Forum Pernyataan: Sidang Dewan Rakyat (Parlemen Malaydesh) saat menjawab pertanyaan terkait anggaran pertahanan pada 26 Februari 2026.
      Landasan Keputusan: Keputusan formal dicapai dalam rapat Kabinet pada 6 Februari 2026, menyusul hasil evaluasi tim teknis TUDM yang dikirim ke Kuwait pada 11-27 November 2025.
      Alasan Teknis: Pesawat Hornet Kuwait (varian C/D) dinilai memiliki risiko logistik jangka panjang dan secara teknis lebih tua dari armada F/A-18D yang saat ini dioperasikan Malaydesh.
      ________________________________________
      GEMPURWIRA20 Agustus 2025 pukul 10.00
      BEZA ya guys... HAHAHAHA
      MALAYDESH...
      F18 KUWAIT masih dipakai dan siap segera di pindahkan ke MALAYDESH nanti...
      -
      GEMPURWIRA8 Oktober 2024 pukul 08.50
      INDIANESIA KETAR KETIR....HAHAHAHAH
      18 Buah Su 30MKM
      17 Buah Bae hawk 108/208
      8 + 39 Buah F/A-18 Hornet C/D
      18 +18 Buah FA-50M Block 20
      -
      GEMPURWIRA4 Maret 2023 pukul 07.40
      Mantap...... Sokongan penuh pada penambahan pesawat F18....
      Yang hanya mampu shoping drone kecil tu tepi sikit ya.... Hahhahahha
      -
      sandstorm719 Desember 2022 pukul 06.58
      Ia yg penting lgi bs terbang engak ada masalah loh...
      -
      GEMPURWIRA 23 Desember 2021 12.33
      Nampaknya MALAYDESH sudah berhubung dengan pihak kuwait.. Semoga BERJAYA...
      ________________________________________
      🤣ON TERUS : BATAL = SIPRI LEMBAR KOSONG🤣

      Hapus
    2. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      -
      INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
      -
      MALAYDESH.......
      F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
      JF17 = PRANK
      RAFALE = PRANK
      TYPHOON = PRANK
      GRIPEN = PRANK
      TEJAS = PRANK
      MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
      FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
      ________________________________________
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      -
      2005: Prank China (KS-1A)
      Najib Razak menyatakan Malaydesh setuju secara prinsip membeli rudal jarak menengah KS-1A dari China dengan imbalan transfer teknologi. Hasil: Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga saat ini.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Malaydesh dilaporkan mempersempit pilihan ke Dassault Rafale untuk pengadaan 18 jet tempur senilai USD 2 miliar. Hasil: Proyek ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) di DSA 2016 untuk 20 unit artileri Caesar 155mm. Hasil: Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; Malaydesh akhirnya memilih unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      “The MALAYDESH government has shown interest in buying the JF-17 Thunder aircraft from Pakistan but the deal is yet to be finalized,” a senior Pakistan Ministry of Defense Production official told Arab News. Hasil: Malaydesh tiada akusisi jet tersebut.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim bahwa kontrak kapal MRSS akan ditandatangani Agustus 2018. Hasil: Hingga saat ini, kontrak tersebut tidak pernah terealisasi dengan PT PAL.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Malaydesh mengidentifikasi Tejas sebagai kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut. Hasil: Malaydesh justru memilih FA-50 Block 20 dari Korea Selatan pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Kemenhan Malaydesh meninjau ulang rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm setelah sebelumnya dikabarkan akan dibeli. Hasil: Dibatalkan/diganti dengan sistem lain.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Malaydesh diharapkan menyelesaikan kesepakatan untuk pasokan EVA 155mm. Hasil: Senasib dengan Yavuz, tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      =
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Sembilan kendaraan IAG Guardian yang dikirim untuk misi PBB (UNIFIL) dinyatakan tidak memenuhi persyaratan operasional, berujung pada sanksi pemotongan biaya operasional.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Black Hawk
      Ini menjadi salah satu "prank" terbesar baru-baru ini. Malaydesh berencana menyewa empat helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari perusahaan lokal Aerotree Defence & Services untuk menggantikan helikopter Nuri yang sudah tua.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Kuwait - Jet Tempur F/A-18 Hornet
      Malaydesh menunjukkan ketertarikan kuat untuk membeli jet tempur F/A-18 Hornet bekas milik Angkatan Udara Kuwait untuk menambah kekuatan udara mereka secara instan.
      -.
      2026 Pembekuan Pengadaan Massal
      Kejadian: Pada awal 2026, PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan semua keputusan pengadaan militer karena adanya penyelidikan dugaan korupsi dan kartel dalam kementerian pertahanan. Ini berdampak pada rencana-rencana yang sedang dibahas sepanjang 2024 dan 2025.
      ________________________________________
      DIBATALKAN/CANCELLED
      -
      F/A 18C/D Hornet bekas Kuwait (2025–2026)
      Dibatalkan resmi oleh Kabinet Malaydesh pada Februari 2026 setelah evaluasi teknis RMAF menunjukkan masalah ketersediaan, logistik, dan biaya jangka panjang.
      -
      UH 60 Blackhawk (1990 an)
      Rencana mengganti helikopter Nuri dengan Blackhawk tidak diteruskan karena biaya tinggi dan faktor politik/industri. Malaydesh akhirnya memilih EC725 Cougar/H225M sebagai pengganti.
      -
      MRCA (Multi Role Combat Aircraft, 2010 an)
      Program besar untuk mengganti MiG 29 dengan Rafale/Eurofighter/Gripen dibatalkan/ditunda berulang kali karena kekangan fiskal. Malaydesh akhirnya memilih FA 50 Block 20 (2023) sebagai solusi interim.
      -
      Sea Skua (rudal anti kapal tambahan, 2000 an)
      Upgrade rudal untuk helikopter Lynx tidak diteruskan, fokus bergeser ke sistem baru.

      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      Kegagalan proyek strategis "Malaydesh" (sebutan dalam konteks analisis Anda) bukan sekadar masalah teknis militer, melainkan refleksi dari kesehatan ekonomi makro negara tersebut =
      -
      1. Lumpuhnya Belanja Modal (CAPEX): Ketika rasio utang terhadap PDB meningkat, ruang fiskal untuk belanja alutsista yang mahal menyempit. Akibatnya, anggaran pertahanan habis hanya untuk biaya operasional (OPEX) seperti gaji dan pemeliharaan rutin.
      -
      2. Kehilangan Kepercayaan Vendor: Pola pembatalan kontrak (Letter of Intent yang tidak berujung kontrak formal) menciptakan persepsi negatif bagi produsen global (Dassault, Nexter, Boeing, dsb.), yang membuat negosiasi di masa depan menjadi lebih sulit dan mahal.
      -
      3. Proyek Mangkrak (LCS): Kasus LCS (Gowind Class) menjadi simbol kegagalan manajemen proyek kronis, di mana anggaran terserap namun fisik kapal tidak kunjung selesai, menciptakan opportunity cost yang sangat besar.
      ________________________________________
      KRONOLOGI "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
      2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
      Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
      Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
      Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
      Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
      Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
      Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      -
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
      Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
      -
      2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
      Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
      Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
      -
      2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
      Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
      Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
      -
      2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
      Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan.
      ________________________________________
      GEMPURWIRA26 Agustus 2025 pukul 18.13
      pasti rasa sedihkan GORILLA MISKIN..... yang Program F18 KUWAIT ON terusssss.....HAHAHAHHA
      -
      GEMPURWIRA8 Oktober 2024 pukul 09.49
      horeyyyyy...F18 come to PAPA
      -
      GEMPURWIRA4 Maret 2023 pukul 07.40
      Mantap...... Sokongan penuh pada penambahan pesawat F18....
      Yang hanya mampu shoping drone kecil tu tepi sikit ya.... Hahhahahha
      -
      sandstorm719 Desember 2022 pukul 06.58
      Ia yg penting lgi bs terbang engak ada masalah loh...
      -
      GEMPURWIRA 23 Desember 2021 12.33
      Nampaknya MALAYDESH sudah berhubung dengan pihak kuwait.. Semoga BERJAYA...
      ________________________________________
      🤣ON TERUS : BATAL = SIPRI LEMBAR KOSONG🤣

      Hapus
  43. APBN Dalam Tekanan: Saat Subsidi BBM & Listrik Jadi Bom Waktu Fiskal

    https://pluang.com/akademi/berita-analisis/APBN-dalam-tekanan

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
      -
      MALAYDESH.......
      F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
      JF17 = PRANK
      RAFALE = PRANK
      TYPHOON = PRANK
      GRIPEN = PRANK
      TEJAS = PRANK
      MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
      FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
      ________________________________________
      SU 35 GANTI RAFALE
      Rencana pembelian 11 unit Sukhoi Su-35 dari Rusia resmi dihentikan karena hambatan geopolitik.
      Alasan Gagal: Ancaman sanksi CAATSA dari Amerika Serikat yang dapat mengisolasi ekonomi Indonesia jika bertransaksi militer dengan Rusia.
      Status Pengganti: Indonesia memilih Dassault Rafale asal Prancis dan telah mengaktifkan seluruh kontrak untuk 42 unit. Per Januari 2026, tiga unit perdana telah tiba di Indonesia dan ditempatkan di Lanud Roesmin Nurjadin, Pekanbaru.
      ________________________________________
      MIRAGE 2000-5 GANTI KAAN
      Rencana akuisisi 12 unit Mirage 2000-5 bekas dari Qatar awalnya dimaksudkan sebagai "pesawat antara" (gap filler).
      Alasan Gagal: Keterbatasan ruang fiskal (anggaran) dan kontroversi mengenai urgensi membeli pesawat bekas yang sudah tua.
      Status Pengganti: Pemerintah kini lebih melirik investasi jangka panjang pada jet tempur generasi ke-5 KAAN buatan Turki untuk mencapai kemandirian teknologi, selain tetap fokus pada kedatangan Rafale.
      ________________________________________
      J-10CE GANTI KF-21 BORAMAE
      Meskipun sempat ada ketertarikan dan diskusi eksploratif mengenai jet tempur J-10CE asal Tiongkok, kesepakatan ini tidak berlanjut ke tahap kontrak formal.
      Alasan Gagal: Kekhawatiran akan beban logistik yang berbeda jauh dengan standar Barat yang dominan di TNI AU, serta fokus anggaran yang dialihkan ke program pengembangan bersama.
      Status Pengganti: Indonesia menegaskan kembali komitmen pada proyek KF-21 Boramae dengan Korea Selatan. Indonesia akuisisi 48 KF21 Block II
      ________________________________________
      F-15IDN GANTI M-346F
      Rencana pembelian 24 unit F-15EX (F-15IDN) dari Boeing yang sudah mencapai tahap MoU pada 2023 akhirnya menemui jalan buntu.
      Alasan Gagal: Pada Februari 2026, Boeing secara resmi menyatakan penghentian program F-15 untuk Indonesia karena harga yang dinilai terlalu tinggi dan belum adanya alokasi anggaran resmi dari pemerintah Indonesia.
      Status Pengganti: Fokus pengadaan kini bergeser ke jet tempur ringan/latih lanjut M-346F buatan Leonardo, Italia, yang dianggap lebih rasional secara anggaran untuk memperkuat skadron tempur taktis.
      ==========
      ==========
      2026 =
      CANCELLED F18 = TIADA GANTI
      CANCELLED F18 = TIADA GANTI
      CANCELLED F18 = TIADA GANTI
      -
      Detail Konfirmasi Resmi
      Narasumber: Wakil Menteri Pertahanan Malaydesh, Adly Zahari.
      Forum Pernyataan: Sidang Dewan Rakyat (Parlemen Malaydesh) saat menjawab pertanyaan terkait anggaran pertahanan pada 26 Februari 2026.
      -
      GEMPURWIRA26 Agustus 2025 pukul 18.13
      pasti rasa sedihkan GORILLA MISKIN..... yang Program F18 KUWAIT ON terusssss.....HAHAHAHHA
      -
      GEMPURWIRA28 Oktober 2024 pukul 12.50
      39 buah + 8 buah..... Banyak woiiii.... 😎😎🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
      -
      GEMPURWIRA4 Maret 2023 pukul 07.40
      Mantap...... Sokongan penuh pada penambahan pesawat F18....
      Yang hanya mampu shoping drone kecil tu tepi sikit ya.... Hahhahahha
      -
      sandstorm719 Desember 2022 pukul 06.58
      Ia yg penting lgi bs terbang engak ada masalah loh...
      -
      GEMPURWIRA 23 Desember 2021 12.33
      Nampaknya MALAYDESH sudah berhubung dengan pihak kuwait.. Semoga BERJAYA.

      Hapus
    2. INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
      ________________________________________
      1. SU-35 > RAFALE
      Batal (Su-35): Rencana awal 11 unit dari Rusia.
      Pengganti (Rafale): Indonesia telah mengaktifkan seluruh kontrak untuk total 42 unit.
      ________________________________________
      2. MIRAGE 2000-5 > KAAN
      Batal (Mirage 2000-5): Rencana akuisisi 12 unit pesawat bekas dari Qatar.
      Pengganti (KAAN): Indonesia resmi menyepakati pembelian 48 unit jet tempur generasi ke-5 dari Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI).
      ________________________________________
      3. J-10CE > KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      Batal (J-10CE): Sempat masuk radar pertimbangan namun tidak berlanjut ke kontrak resmi.
      Pengganti (KF-21): Indonesia berkomitmen pada pengembangan bersama Korea Selatan dengan target total 48 unit.
      ________________________________________
      4. F-15IDN > M-346F
      Batal (F-15IDN): Rencana 24 unit F-15EX resmi dihentikan oleh Boeing pada Februari 2026 karena kendala anggaran.
      Pengganti (M-346F): Indonesia beralih ke pesawat tempur ringan/latih jet lanjut M-346F Block 20 dari Leonardo, Italia.
      ====================
      ====================
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      -
      2005: Prank China (KS-1A)
      Najib Razak menyatakan Malaydesh setuju secara prinsip membeli rudal jarak menengah KS-1A dari China dengan imbalan transfer teknologi. Hasil: Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga saat ini.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Malaydesh dilaporkan mempersempit pilihan ke Dassault Rafale untuk pengadaan 18 jet tempur senilai USD 2 miliar. Hasil: Proyek ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) di DSA 2016 untuk 20 unit artileri Caesar 155mm. Hasil: Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; Malaydesh akhirnya memilih unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      “The MALAYDESH government has shown interest in buying the JF-17 Thunder aircraft from Pakistan but the deal is yet to be finalized,” a senior Pakistan Ministry of Defense Production official told Arab News. Hasil: Malaydesh tiada akusisi jet tersebut.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim bahwa kontrak kapal MRSS akan ditandatangani Agustus 2018. Hasil: Hingga saat ini, kontrak tersebut tidak pernah terealisasi dengan PT PAL.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Malaydesh mengidentifikasi Tejas sebagai kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut. Hasil: Malaydesh justru memilih FA-50 Block 20 dari Korea Selatan pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Kemenhan Malaydesh meninjau ulang rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm setelah sebelumnya dikabarkan akan dibeli. Hasil: Dibatalkan/diganti dengan sistem lain.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Malaydesh diharapkan menyelesaikan kesepakatan untuk pasokan EVA 155mm. Hasil: Senasib dengan Yavuz, tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      =
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Sembilan kendaraan IAG Guardian yang dikirim untuk misi PBB (UNIFIL) dinyatakan tidak memenuhi persyaratan operasional, berujung pada sanksi pemotongan biaya operasional.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Black Hawk
      Ini menjadi salah satu "prank" terbesar baru-baru ini. Malaydesh berencana menyewa empat helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari perusahaan lokal Aerotree Defence & Services untuk menggantikan helikopter Nuri yang sudah tua.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Kuwait - Jet Tempur F/A-18 Hornet
      Malaydesh menunjukkan ketertarikan kuat untuk membeli jet tempur F/A-18 Hornet bekas milik Angkatan Udara Kuwait untuk menambah kekuatan udara mereka secara instan.
      -.
      2026 Pembekuan Pengadaan Massal
      Kejadian: Pada awal 2026, PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan semua keputusan pengadaan militer karena adanya penyelidikan dugaan korupsi dan kartel dalam kementerian pertahanan. Ini berdampak pada rencana-rencana yang sedang dibahas sepanjang 2024 dan 2025.

      Hapus
    3. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      -
      INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
      -
      MALAYDESH.......
      F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
      JF17 = PRANK
      RAFALE = PRANK
      TYPHOON = PRANK
      GRIPEN = PRANK
      TEJAS = PRANK
      MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
      FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
      ________________________________________
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      -
      2005: Prank China (KS-1A)
      Najib Razak menyatakan Malaydesh setuju secara prinsip membeli rudal jarak menengah KS-1A dari China dengan imbalan transfer teknologi. Hasil: Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga saat ini.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Malaydesh dilaporkan mempersempit pilihan ke Dassault Rafale untuk pengadaan 18 jet tempur senilai USD 2 miliar. Hasil: Proyek ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) di DSA 2016 untuk 20 unit artileri Caesar 155mm. Hasil: Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; Malaydesh akhirnya memilih unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      “The MALAYDESH government has shown interest in buying the JF-17 Thunder aircraft from Pakistan but the deal is yet to be finalized,” a senior Pakistan Ministry of Defense Production official told Arab News. Hasil: Malaydesh tiada akusisi jet tersebut.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim bahwa kontrak kapal MRSS akan ditandatangani Agustus 2018. Hasil: Hingga saat ini, kontrak tersebut tidak pernah terealisasi dengan PT PAL.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Malaydesh mengidentifikasi Tejas sebagai kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut. Hasil: Malaydesh justru memilih FA-50 Block 20 dari Korea Selatan pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Kemenhan Malaydesh meninjau ulang rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm setelah sebelumnya dikabarkan akan dibeli. Hasil: Dibatalkan/diganti dengan sistem lain.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Malaydesh diharapkan menyelesaikan kesepakatan untuk pasokan EVA 155mm. Hasil: Senasib dengan Yavuz, tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      =
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Sembilan kendaraan IAG Guardian yang dikirim untuk misi PBB (UNIFIL) dinyatakan tidak memenuhi persyaratan operasional, berujung pada sanksi pemotongan biaya operasional.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Black Hawk
      Ini menjadi salah satu "prank" terbesar baru-baru ini. Malaydesh berencana menyewa empat helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari perusahaan lokal Aerotree Defence & Services untuk menggantikan helikopter Nuri yang sudah tua.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Kuwait - Jet Tempur F/A-18 Hornet
      Malaydesh menunjukkan ketertarikan kuat untuk membeli jet tempur F/A-18 Hornet bekas milik Angkatan Udara Kuwait untuk menambah kekuatan udara mereka secara instan.
      -.
      2026 Pembekuan Pengadaan Massal
      Kejadian: Pada awal 2026, PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan semua keputusan pengadaan militer karena adanya penyelidikan dugaan korupsi dan kartel dalam kementerian pertahanan. Ini berdampak pada rencana-rencana yang sedang dibahas sepanjang 2024 dan 2025.
      ________________________________________
      DIBATALKAN/CANCELLED
      -
      F/A 18C/D Hornet bekas Kuwait (2025–2026)
      Dibatalkan resmi oleh Kabinet Malaydesh pada Februari 2026 setelah evaluasi teknis RMAF menunjukkan masalah ketersediaan, logistik, dan biaya jangka panjang.
      -
      UH 60 Blackhawk (1990 an)
      Rencana mengganti helikopter Nuri dengan Blackhawk tidak diteruskan karena biaya tinggi dan faktor politik/industri. Malaydesh akhirnya memilih EC725 Cougar/H225M sebagai pengganti.
      -
      MRCA (Multi Role Combat Aircraft, 2010 an)
      Program besar untuk mengganti MiG 29 dengan Rafale/Eurofighter/Gripen dibatalkan/ditunda berulang kali karena kekangan fiskal. Malaydesh akhirnya memilih FA 50 Block 20 (2023) sebagai solusi interim.
      -
      Sea Skua (rudal anti kapal tambahan, 2000 an)
      Upgrade rudal untuk helikopter Lynx tidak diteruskan, fokus bergeser ke sistem baru.

      Hapus
    4. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
      IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
      IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
      -
      -
      INDONESIA .....
      11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
      12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
      42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
      24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
      -
      MALAYDESH.......
      F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
      JF17 = PRANK
      RAFALE = PRANK
      TYPHOON = PRANK
      GRIPEN = PRANK
      TEJAS = PRANK
      MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
      FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
      ________________________________________
      PRANK 🦧GORILA = 2005 – 2026
      -
      2005: Prank China (KS-1A)
      Najib Razak menyatakan Malaydesh setuju secara prinsip membeli rudal jarak menengah KS-1A dari China dengan imbalan transfer teknologi. Hasil: Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga saat ini.
      -
      2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
      Malaydesh dilaporkan mempersempit pilihan ke Dassault Rafale untuk pengadaan 18 jet tempur senilai USD 2 miliar. Hasil: Proyek ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran.
      -
      2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
      Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) di DSA 2016 untuk 20 unit artileri Caesar 155mm. Hasil: Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; Malaydesh akhirnya memilih unit lain.
      -
      2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
      “The MALAYDESH government has shown interest in buying the JF-17 Thunder aircraft from Pakistan but the deal is yet to be finalized,” a senior Pakistan Ministry of Defense Production official told Arab News. Hasil: Malaydesh tiada akusisi jet tersebut.
      -
      2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
      Klaim bahwa kontrak kapal MRSS akan ditandatangani Agustus 2018. Hasil: Hingga saat ini, kontrak tersebut tidak pernah terealisasi dengan PT PAL.
      -
      2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
      Malaydesh mengidentifikasi Tejas sebagai kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut. Hasil: Malaydesh justru memilih FA-50 Block 20 dari Korea Selatan pada 2023.
      -
      2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
      Kemenhan Malaydesh meninjau ulang rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm setelah sebelumnya dikabarkan akan dibeli. Hasil: Dibatalkan/diganti dengan sistem lain.
      -
      2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
      Malaydesh diharapkan menyelesaikan kesepakatan untuk pasokan EVA 155mm. Hasil: Senasib dengan Yavuz, tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
      =
      2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
      Sembilan kendaraan IAG Guardian yang dikirim untuk misi PBB (UNIFIL) dinyatakan tidak memenuhi persyaratan operasional, berujung pada sanksi pemotongan biaya operasional.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Black Hawk
      Ini menjadi salah satu "prank" terbesar baru-baru ini. Malaydesh berencana menyewa empat helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari perusahaan lokal Aerotree Defence & Services untuk menggantikan helikopter Nuri yang sudah tua.
      -
      2024–2025 Prank Kuwait - Jet Tempur F/A-18 Hornet
      Malaydesh menunjukkan ketertarikan kuat untuk membeli jet tempur F/A-18 Hornet bekas milik Angkatan Udara Kuwait untuk menambah kekuatan udara mereka secara instan.
      -.
      2026 Pembekuan Pengadaan Massal
      Kejadian: Pada awal 2026, PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan semua keputusan pengadaan militer karena adanya penyelidikan dugaan korupsi dan kartel dalam kementerian pertahanan. Ini berdampak pada rencana-rencana yang sedang dibahas sepanjang 2024 dan 2025.
      ________________________________________
      DIBATALKAN/CANCELLED
      -
      F/A 18C/D Hornet bekas Kuwait (2025–2026)
      Dibatalkan resmi oleh Kabinet Malaydesh pada Februari 2026 setelah evaluasi teknis RMAF menunjukkan masalah ketersediaan, logistik, dan biaya jangka panjang.
      -
      UH 60 Blackhawk (1990 an)
      Rencana mengganti helikopter Nuri dengan Blackhawk tidak diteruskan karena biaya tinggi dan faktor politik/industri. Malaydesh akhirnya memilih EC725 Cougar/H225M sebagai pengganti.
      -
      MRCA (Multi Role Combat Aircraft, 2010 an)
      Program besar untuk mengganti MiG 29 dengan Rafale/Eurofighter/Gripen dibatalkan/ditunda berulang kali karena kekangan fiskal. Malaydesh akhirnya memilih FA 50 Block 20 (2023) sebagai solusi interim.
      -
      Sea Skua (rudal anti kapal tambahan, 2000 an)
      Upgrade rudal untuk helikopter Lynx tidak diteruskan, fokus bergeser ke sistem baru.

      Hapus
  44. Kashiyan, Menteri Keuangan/MoF kita ketawain negri🎰kasino genting kl haha!🤣🤣🤣

    barusan KENSEL ART, minyak petrol, diesel, beras langsung NAIK🔥
    KTIPU GOMEN LAGI haha!🤥😋🤥
    ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
    Purbaya Pamer Harga BBM RI Tak Naik di Tengah Perang: Kita Lebih Jago Dibanding Negara Tetangga!
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=9MvuoUiZ57Q

    BalasHapus
  45. INDONESIA .....
    11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
    12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
    42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
    24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
    -
    MALAYDESH.......
    F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
    JF17 = PRANK
    RAFALE = PRANK
    TYPHOON = PRANK
    GRIPEN = PRANK
    TEJAS = PRANK
    MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
    FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
    ________________________________________
    F18 2021-2025, NARASI UTAMA PEJABAT MALAYDESH =
    -
    🗓️ 2021: Pernyataan Minat & Evaluasi Awal
    Minat Resmi: Malaydesh menyatakan ketertarikan resmi terhadap 33 unit Hornet Kuwait.
    Kondisi: Pejabat menilai pesawat ini sebagai solusi cepat (stop-gap measure) yang sangat layak untuk meningkatkan kekuatan udara TUDM tanpa menunggu produksi pesawat baru yang lama.
    Kompatibilitas: Penekanan bahwa pesawat ini cocok karena TUDM sudah memiliki infrastruktur perawatan dan pilot yang berpengalaman dengan platform Hornet.
    -
    🗓️ 2022 - 2023: Diplomasi & Penilaian Teknis
    Kunjungan Teknis: Delegasi TUDM melakukan penilaian mendalam di Kuwait.
    Hasil Evaluasi: Pejabat militer melaporkan bahwa pesawat dirawat dengan standar tinggi oleh Angkatan Udara Kuwait, memastikan sistem avionik dan badan pesawat dalam kondisi sangat baik.
    -
    🗓️ 2024: Penegasan Kualitas (Data Jam Terbang)
    Pernyataan Menhan: Menteri Pertahanan, Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin, memberikan detail teknis kepada publik dan parlemen.
    Data Jam Terbang: Ditegaskan bahwa pesawat hanya memiliki 1.500 hingga 3.000 jam terbang.
    Justifikasi: Angka ini jauh di bawah batas service life (6.000-8.000 jam), sehingga secara operasional pesawat ini masih dianggap sangat "muda".
    -
    🗓️ 2025 (Januari - Agustus): Tahap Negosiasi Akhir
    Kesiapan Tempur: Pejabat militer terus memberikan testimoni bahwa pesawat dalam kondisi siap tempur dan akan langsung meningkatkan kesiapan ruang udara Malaydesh segera setelah tiba.
    Agustus 2025: Meskipun kondisi fisik pesawat diakui sangat bagus, Malaydesh resmi membatalkan rencana akuisisi karena ketidakpastian jadwal pengiriman dari pihak Kuwait yang masih menunggu pesawat baru mereka tiba.
    ________________________________________
    PEJABAT DAN BERUK = MEMBUAL
    -
    pernyataan pejabat Malaydesh mengenai F/A-18 Hornet Kuwait (2021–2025):
    -
    2021 (Solusi Instan): Pemerintah menyatakan minat pada 33 unit Hornet sebagai solusi cepat (stop-gap) karena kompatibel dengan infrastruktur perawatan dan pilot TUDM yang sudah ada.
    -
    2022–2023 (Kondisi Prima): Hasil inspeksi langsung delegasi TUDM ke Kuwait mengonfirmasi bahwa pesawat dirawat dengan standar tinggi, serta memiliki sistem avionik dan rangka (airframe) yang masih prima.
    -
    2024 (Jam Terbang Rendah): Menhan Mohamed Khaled Nordin menegaskan di Parlemen bahwa pesawat masih "sangat muda" dengan 1.500–3.000 jam terbang, jauh di bawah batas usia pakai 6.000–8.000 jam.
    -
    2025 (Siap Tempur & Pembatalan): Pejabat militer menyatakan pesawat dalam kondisi siap tempur (combat ready). Namun, pada Agustus 2025 rencana dibatalkan akibat ketidakpastian jadwal pengiriman dari pihak Kuwait.
    -
    GEMPURWIRA26 Agustus 2025 pukul 18.13
    pasti rasa sedihkan GORILLA MISKIN..... yang Program F18 KUWAIT ON terusssss.....HAHAHAHHA
    ________________________________________
    Sumber Berita Utama
    New Straits Times (NST): Laporan berjudul "Govt scraps plan to acquire Kuwait's used F/A-18 Hornets" yang diterbitkan pada 26 Februari 2026.
    Bernama: Kantor berita nasional Malaydesh yang melaporkan penggulungan perdebatan tingkat komite RUU Perbekalan Tambahan di Dewan Rakyat.
    Militarnyi & Defense Blog: Portal berita pertahanan internasional yang merangkum keputusan pemerintah Malaydesh berdasarkan laporan teknis dari TUDM.
    -
    Detail Konfirmasi Resmi
    Narasumber: Wakil Menteri Pertahanan Malaydesh, Adly Zahari.
    Forum Pernyataan: Sidang Dewan Rakyat (Parlemen Malaydesh) saat menjawab pertanyaan terkait anggaran pertahanan pada 26 Februari 2026.

    BalasHapus
  46. INDONESIA .....
    11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
    12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
    42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
    24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
    -
    1. SU-35 > RAFALE
    Batal (Su-35): Rencana awal 11 unit dari Rusia.
    Pengganti (Rafale): Indonesia telah mengaktifkan seluruh kontrak untuk total 42 unit.
    -
    2. MIRAGE 2000-5 > KAAN
    Batal (Mirage 2000-5): Rencana akuisisi 12 unit pesawat bekas dari Qatar.
    Pengganti (KAAN): Indonesia resmi menyepakati pembelian 48 unit jet tempur generasi ke-5 dari Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI).
    -
    3. J-10CE > KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
    Batal (J-10CE): Sempat masuk radar pertimbangan namun tidak berlanjut ke kontrak resmi.
    Pengganti (KF-21): Indonesia berkomitmen pada pengembangan bersama Korea Selatan dengan target total 48 unit.
    -
    4. F-15IDN > M-346F
    Batal (F-15IDN): Rencana 24 unit F-15EX resmi dihentikan oleh Boeing pada Februari 2026 karena kendala anggaran.
    Pengganti (M-346F): Indonesia beralih ke pesawat tempur ringan/latih jet lanjut M-346F Block 20 dari Leonardo, Italia.
    ====================
    ====================
    MALAYDESH.......
    F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
    JF17 = PRANK
    RAFALE = PRANK
    TYPHOON = PRANK
    GRIPEN = PRANK
    TEJAS = PRANK
    MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
    FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
    -
    2026 =
    CANCELLED F18 = TIADA GANTI
    CANCELLED F18 = TIADA GANTI
    CANCELLED F18 = TIADA GANTI
    -
    Detail Konfirmasi Resmi
    Narasumber: Wakil Menteri Pertahanan Malaydesh, Adly Zahari.
    Forum Pernyataan: Sidang Dewan Rakyat (Parlemen Malaydesh) saat menjawab pertanyaan terkait anggaran pertahanan pada 26 Februari 2026.
    ________________________________________
    GEMPURWIRA26 Agustus 2025 pukul 18.13
    pasti rasa sedihkan GORILLA MISKIN..... yang Program F18 KUWAIT ON terusssss.....HAHAHAHHA
    -
    GEMPURWIRA28 Oktober 2024 pukul 12.50
    39 buah + 8 buah..... Banyak woiiii.... 😎😎🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
    -
    GEMPURWIRA4 Maret 2023 pukul 07.40
    Mantap...... Sokongan penuh pada penambahan pesawat F18....
    Yang hanya mampu shoping drone kecil tu tepi sikit ya.... Hahhahahha
    -
    sandstorm719 Desember 2022 pukul 06.58
    Ia yg penting lgi bs terbang engak ada masalah loh...
    -
    GEMPURWIRA 23 Desember 2021 12.33
    Nampaknya MALAYDESH sudah berhubung dengan pihak kuwait.. Semoga BERJAYA.

    BalasHapus
  47. Pantesan PETROL DIESEL NAIK
    lahh no.2 NGUTANG SEKAWASAN ASEAN gaesz haha!😝😋😝
    ######
    Tangga NO.2 Utang terbanyak seASEAN milik kl haha!😋😋😋
    Hutang Isi Rumah Malaysia tangga ke-2 di Asia Tenggara
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=bTeEGLY_eQs&pp=ygUPSHV0YW5nIG1hbGF5c2lh0gcJCR4Bo7VqN5tD

    BalasHapus
  48. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    ________________________________________
    1. Status Pengadaan & Akuisisi Alutsista
    Indonesia (Proaktif & Nyata):
    Realisasi Kontrak Rafale: Komitmen penuh terhadap 42 unit Dassault Rafale (telah masuk fase aktivasi kontrak).
    Investasi KAAN : Keterlibatan aktif dalam pengembangan jet tempur generasi 5 bersama Turki.
    Investasi KF-21 Boramae: Keterlibatan aktif dalam pengembangan jet tempur generasi 4.5 bersama Korea Selatan.
    -
    Malaydesh (Reaktif & Stagnan):
    Ketergantungan Alutsista Tua: Masih mengandalkan armada F-18 Hornet dan Su-30MKM tanpa kepastian pengganti.
    Vakum MRCA: Program Multi-Role Combat Aircraft tidak mengalami kemajuan nyata sejak 2017.
    Krisis Identitas: Sering berganti-ganti kandidat (dari Rafale, Typhoon, hingga Tejas) namun berakhir tanpa tanda tangan kontrak formal.
    ________________________________________
    2. Skala Prioritas & Manajemen Fiskal
    Indonesia (Disiplin & Stabil):
    Disiplin Fiskal: Menjaga rasio utang dan anggaran untuk memastikan termin pembayaran alutsista baru berjalan lancar.
    Kepastian Anggaran: Alokasi dana difokuskan pada pembelian unit baru untuk menjamin usia pakai yang panjang.
    -
    Malaydesh (Spiral Utang & Spekulatif):
    Skema Sewa (Leasing): Terjebak pada rencana penyewaan helikopter (seperti kasus Black Hawk) yang seringkali tidak efektif secara biaya.
    Berburu Barang Bekas: Upaya mengakuisisi jet bekas (Hornet Kuwait) yang seringkali gagal karena kendala teknis, logistik, atau izin pihak ketiga.
    ________________________________________
    3. Visi Jangka Panjang & Industri Dalam Negeri
    Indonesia (Kemandirian Strategis):
    Penguatan Industri Lokal: Memaksimalkan peran PT PAL (kapal), PT DI (pesawat), dan PT Pindad (kendaraan tempur/artileri).
    Transfer Teknologi (ToT): Setiap pembelian besar diwajibkan menyertakan skema ToT untuk memperkuat teknisi dalam negeri.
    -
    Malaydesh (Kegagalan Kolaborasi):
    Proyek Mangkrak: Kegagalan manajemen pada proyek besar seperti LCS (kapal perang) yang terbengkalai bertahun-tahun.
    Wacana Kolaborasi: Banyak rencana kerja sama (seperti MRSS dengan PT PAL) yang hanya berakhir di atas kertas tanpa realisasi fisik.
    ________________________________________
    4. Keandalan Operasional di Lapangan
    Indonesia: Fokus pada pembaruan teknologi terkini (Radar AESA, persenjataan presisi) melalui pesawat baru (Rafale/KAAN/KF21).
    -
    Malaydesh: Menghadapi risiko penurunan kesiapan tempur (readiness) akibat armada tua dan kegagalan sistem pendukung
    ________________________________________
    INDONESIA .....
    11 SU-35 > 42 RAFALE
    12 MIRAGE 2000-5 > 48 KAAN
    42 J-10CE > 48 KF-21 BORAMAE BLOCK II
    24 F-15IDN > 24 M-346F
    -
    MALAYDESH.......
    F18 KUWAIT = CANCELLED
    JF17 = PRANK
    RAFALE = PRANK
    TYPHOON = PRANK
    GRIPEN = PRANK
    TEJAS = PRANK
    MIG29N = TIADA GANTI
    FA50MURAH = DIBLOKIR USA
    -
    GEMPURWIRA26 Agustus 2025 pukul 18.13
    pasti rasa sedihkan GORILLA MISKIN..... yang Program F18 KUWAIT ON terusssss.....HAHAHAHHA
    -
    GEMPURWIRA8 Oktober 2024 pukul 09.49
    horeyyyyy...F18 come to PAPA
    -
    GEMPURWIRA4 Maret 2023 pukul 07.40
    Mantap...... Sokongan penuh pada penambahan pesawat F18....
    Yang hanya mampu shoping drone kecil tu tepi sikit ya.... Hahhahahha
    -
    sandstorm719 Desember 2022 pukul 06.58
    Ia yg penting lgi bs terbang engak ada masalah loh...
    -
    GEMPURWIRA 23 Desember 2021 12.33
    Nampaknya MALAYDESH sudah berhubung dengan pihak kuwait.. Semoga BERJAYA...
    ________________________________________
    🤣ON TERUS : BATAL = SIPRI LEMBAR KOSONG🤣

    BalasHapus
  49. IDN : SIPRI SHOPPING VERSUS MY : SIPRI KOSONG
    IDN : BUYING VERSUS MY : LEASING
    IDN : PROCUREMENT VERSUS MY : RETIREMENT
    -
    Kegagalan proyek strategis "Malaydesh" (sebutan dalam konteks analisis Anda) bukan sekadar masalah teknis militer, melainkan refleksi dari kesehatan ekonomi makro negara tersebut =
    -
    1. Lumpuhnya Belanja Modal (CAPEX): Ketika rasio utang terhadap PDB meningkat, ruang fiskal untuk belanja alutsista yang mahal menyempit. Akibatnya, anggaran pertahanan habis hanya untuk biaya operasional (OPEX) seperti gaji dan pemeliharaan rutin.
    -
    2. Kehilangan Kepercayaan Vendor: Pola pembatalan kontrak (Letter of Intent yang tidak berujung kontrak formal) menciptakan persepsi negatif bagi produsen global (Dassault, Nexter, Boeing, dsb.), yang membuat negosiasi di masa depan menjadi lebih sulit dan mahal.
    -
    3. Proyek Mangkrak (LCS): Kasus LCS (Gowind Class) menjadi simbol kegagalan manajemen proyek kronis, di mana anggaran terserap namun fisik kapal tidak kunjung selesai, menciptakan opportunity cost yang sangat besar.
    ________________________________________
    KRONOLOGI "PRANK" PERTAHANAN MALAYDESH (2005 – 2026)
    2005: Prank China (Rudal KS-1A)
    Klaim: Najib Razak menyatakan setuju membeli rudal KS-1A dengan imbalan transfer teknologi.
    Hasil: Zonk. Tidak ada realisasi pembelian hingga dekade berikutnya.
    -
    2014: Prank Prancis (Dassault Rafale)
    Klaim: Mempersempit pilihan ke Rafale untuk 18 unit jet tempur (USD 2 miliar).
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Ditunda tanpa batas waktu karena kendala anggaran akut.
    -
    2016: Prank Prancis (Nexter Caesar)
    Klaim: Penandatanganan Letter of Intent (LoI) untuk 20 unit artileri 155mm.
    Hasil: Batal. Kontrak resmi tidak pernah ditandatangani; beralih ke unit lain.
    -
    2017: Prank Pakistan (JF-17 Thunder)
    Klaim: Pernyataan ketertarikan resmi dari pejabat Kemenhan Pakistan.
    Hasil: Prank. Tidak ada akuisisi, hanya sebatas wacana di media.
    -
    2018: Prank Indonesia (PT PAL MRSS)
    Klaim: Janji penandatanganan kontrak kapal MRSS pada Agustus 2018.
    Hasil: Zonk. Hingga kini kontrak dengan PT PAL Indonesia tidak pernah terealisasi.
    -
    2022: Prank India (HAL Tejas)
    Klaim: Tejas jadi kandidat kuat pengganti MiG-29 dan masuk tahap negosiasi lanjut.
    Hasil: Prank. Justru memilih FA-50 dari Korsel pada 2023.
    -
    2022: Prank Turki (MKE Yavuz)
    Klaim: Peninjauan rencana akuisisi artileri Yavuz 155mm.
    Hasil: Batal. Diganti dengan sistem lain/dibatalkan total.
    -
    2022: Prank Slovakia (EVA 155mm)
    Klaim: Harapan penyelesaian kesepakatan pasokan artileri EVA.
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Tidak ada kelanjutan kontrak yang nyata.
    -
    2023: Prank PBB (IAG Guardian)
    Klaim: Pengiriman unit untuk misi UNIFIL.
    Hasil: Gagal Operasional. Dinyatakan tidak layak spek oleh PBB, berujung sanksi pemotongan biaya.
    -
    2024–2025: Prank Black Hawk
    Klaim: Rencana sewa 4 helikopter UH-60A Black Hawk dari Aerotree Defence untuk ganti helikopter Nuri.
    Hasil: Mangkrak. Proses berbelit dan tidak ada kepastian unit tiba.
    -
    2026: Prank Kuwait (F/A-18 Hornet) – UPDATE
    Klaim: Ketertarikan kuat membeli jet bekas Kuwait untuk penguatan instan.
    Hasil: Dibatalkan Resmi. Kabinet secara formal membatalkan rencana ini pada Februari 2026 karena masalah biaya logistik dan hasil evaluasi teknis yang buruk.
    -
    2026: Pembekuan Total (Anwar Ibrahim)
    Kejadian: PM Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan pembekuan seluruh pengadaan militer akibat penyelidikan korupsi dan kartel di tubuh Kemenhan.
    ________________________________________
    GEMPURWIRA26 Agustus 2025 pukul 18.13
    pasti rasa sedihkan GORILLA MISKIN..... yang Program F18 KUWAIT ON terusssss.....HAHAHAHHA
    -
    GEMPURWIRA8 Oktober 2024 pukul 09.49
    horeyyyyy...F18 come to PAPA
    -
    GEMPURWIRA4 Maret 2023 pukul 07.40
    Mantap...... Sokongan penuh pada penambahan pesawat F18....
    Yang hanya mampu shoping drone kecil tu tepi sikit ya.... Hahhahahha
    -
    sandstorm719 Desember 2022 pukul 06.58
    Ia yg penting lgi bs terbang engak ada masalah loh...
    -
    GEMPURWIRA 23 Desember 2021 12.33
    Nampaknya MALAYDESH sudah berhubung dengan pihak kuwait.. Semoga BERJAYA...
    ________________________________________
    🤣ON TERUS : BATAL = SIPRI LEMBAR KOSONG🤣

    BalasHapus