Boeing Expands Precision Aerial Munition Partnership with Ferra
BRISBANE, Queensland — Boeing has selected Ferra Engineering to produce wing kits for its High Altitude Anti-Submarine Warfare Weapon Capability (HAAWC). The contract extends the existing partnership between Boeing and Ferra and establishes a local production line for the advanced system, further strengthening Australia’s sovereign defence capabilities.
The HAAWC is designed to be deployed from Boeing’s P-8A multi-mission maritime patrol aircraft. This all-weather, air-launched torpedo kit allows operators to engage submarines from high altitudes, significantly enhancing operational effectiveness and ensuring crew safety.
“Local HAAWC production with Ferra means more skilled jobs in Australia and deeper sovereign manufacturing capability,” said Bob Ciesla, vice president, Boeing Precision Engagement Systems. “This partnership serves as a practical investment in national defence and regional security aligned to Australia’s Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Enterprise sovereign objectives.”
Ferra supplies precision components to various Boeing programs — including the Australian manufactured MQ-28 Ghost Bat as well as exporting components to the US for the F/A-18F Super Hornet, AH-64E Apache and P-8A Poseidon — developed as part of the Australian Defence Force’s Global Supply Chain Program. In 2023, the companies signed a Memorandum of Understanding to produce wing kits for Joint Direct Attack Munition Extended Range (JDAM ER) and Joint Direct Attack Munition Long Range (JDAM LR).
“We are honored to continue our 17-year-long partnership with Boeing on the HAAWC program,” said Aaron Thompson, CEO of Ferra Engineering. “This contract not only reinforces our commitment to delivering high-quality, Australian-made defence solutions but also highlights the importance of collaboration in advancing our nation’s defense capabilities. Together, we are paving the way for innovation and excellence in aerospace manufacturing.”
Boeing's involvement in the Global Supply Chain program has significantly enhanced opportunities for the Australian industry to export products, services, and technology within Boeing's worldwide supply chain. Boeing's partnership with the Australian industry bolsters its commercial aircraft and defence products, space and satellite systems, as well as research and development initiatives, alongside the company’s operations based in Australia.
(Boeing)
Hore SIGN M346 RESMI YAA haha!🤑😭🤑
BalasHapusLOA nich haha!👍🤑👍
warganyet dipersilakan NGAMUK🔥
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Leonardo, PT ESystem Solutions and the Ministry of Defence Of the Republic of Indonesia sign M-346 F AIRCRAFT Letter of Intent to meet Indonesian Air Force training and combat requirements
https://www.leonardo.com/en/press-release-detail/-/detail/04-02-2026-leonardo-pt-esystem-solutions-and-the-ministry-of-defence-of-the-republic-of-indonesia-sign-m-346-f-aircraft-letter-of-intent-to-meet-indonesian-air-force-training-and-combat-requirements
Nah fix kan
HapusCoz calon homebase nya sudah di inspeksi.
Pindah haluan ini dari F 50 golden eagle..🤫
HapusBukan pindah sih... melengkapi lebih tepatnya.
HapusM 346F block 20 sebagai trainer sebelum ke Rafale & next pesawat gen 5
N⛔️ BOWING, MASI ADA LEONARDO & Om BIB BIB haha!💰🤑💰
BalasHapussetelah qatar, prancis, ceko, jerman, britis
BalasHapusUAE & ITALI SAYANG KITA jugak gaesz haha!😍🥳😍
Iya masih banyak negara lain yg sayang kita ... Untuk korsel ...maaf anda terlalu kurang ajar
HapusKorengan buang saja ke laut kebanyakan drama & menghina harga diri bangsa.
HapusSudah kubilang, warganyet kl siyap2 yach...
BalasHapusSHOPPING M346 UDA RESMI NICH haha!🤑😭🤑
warganyet dipersilakan NGAMUK🔥
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Leonardo, PT ESystem Solutions and the Ministry of Defence Of the Republic of Indonesia sign M-346 F AIRCRAFT Letter of Intent to meet Indonesian Air Force training and combat requirements
https://www.leonardo.com/en/press-release-detail/-/detail/04-02-2026-leonardo-pt-esystem-solutions-and-the-ministry-of-defence-of-the-republic-of-indonesia-sign-m-346-f-aircraft-letter-of-intent-to-meet-indonesian-air-force-training-and-combat-requirements
klojot-klojot sebelah om @palu gada .......
Hapusnyoihh goyang tremor Panik🥶mreka kena Stroke awal tahun 2026 om pemburu haha!🤪😤🤪
Hapus5X PM 6X MOD/MOF = ART : WAJIB LAPOR USA
BalasHapus💰 1. Budget Composition Skewed Toward Salaries and Maintenance
• In 2024, Malaydesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o RM8.2 billion (~41.5%) went to salaries and allowances.
o RM5.8 billion was earmarked for maintenance and asset upkeep.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, and infrastructure.
Impact: The lion’s share of the budget sustains personnel and legacy systems, leaving little for new combat capabilities.
📦 2. Procurement Budget Includes Legacy Payments
• The RM5.71 billion procurement allocation in 2024 isn’t entirely for new systems. It includes:
o Scheduled payments for previously signed contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets from South Korea, A400M upgrades).
o Progressive payments for delayed projects like the Maharaja Lela-class Littoral Combat Ships.
o Small-scale purchases (e.g. small arms, radios, support vehicles).
Impact: The actual discretionary funding for new combat platforms is far lower than it appears on paper.
📉 3. Currency Depreciation Erodes Purchasing Power
• Malaydesh sources most of its advanced systems from foreign OEMs (e.g. France, UK, South Korea).
• The depreciation of the ringgit against major currencies means that even modest increases in nominal budget do not translate into real gains.
Impact: Malaydesh pays more for the same equipment, reducing the volume and quality of new acquisitions.
🧱 4. No Multi-Year Strategic Investment Framework
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, Malaydesh lacks a ring-fenced capital investment stream for defense.
• Each year’s procurement is subject to political negotiation and fiscal trade-offs, with no guaranteed continuity.
• This discourages long-term programs like missile development, drone fleets, or integrated air defense systems.
Impact: Strategic programs are fragmented, delayed, or abandoned mid-cycle.
📊 Summary Table: Why Funding for New Combat Systems Is Thin
Factor Description Strategic Impact
Budget skew 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance Minimal room for new acquisitions
Legacy obligations Procurement includes old contracts and delayed projects New systems get crowded out
Currency depreciation Ringgit weakens against USD/EUR Reduces real purchasing power
No strategic investment model No multi-year capital planning Limits continuity and ambition
Fevruari 2026 kita SIGN LAGIIII..ASOY haha!🤗👍🤗
BalasHapusKahsiyan negri🎰kasino genting terusz pusing
Salah PASANG PIPA & KABEL
RE WORK...4000pcs
genk sewa NGAMUK🔥 NO SIGN haha!🤣😆🤣
OVERLIMITS DEBT = MELARAT SEKARAT = SEWA
BalasHapusFEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEBT = PER PEOPLE : RM 36,139
HOUSEHOLD DEBT = PER PEOPLE : RM 45,859.
GOV + HOUSEHOLD = PER PEOPLE : RM 81,998
--------------------
1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
• Utang akhir 2024: RM 1.25 triliun
• Utang akhir Juni 2025: RM 1.30 triliun
• Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh 2025 (perkiraan pertengahan tahun): 35,977,838 jiwa
2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
1.30 triliun = 1,300,000,000,000
Per Orang = 1,300,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 36,139 per orang
--------------------
1️⃣ DATA YANG DIGUNAKAN
• Utang rumah tangga (akhir Maret 2025): RM 1.65 triliun
• Persentase terhadap PDB: 84.3%
• Jumlah penduduk Malaydesh pertengahan 2025: 35,977,838 jiwa
2️⃣ Perhitungan utang per penduduk
Utang per orang =1,650,000,000,000/35,977,838 : RM 45,859 per orang
-------------------
Structural Causes of Modernization Delays
Why does modernization lag behind?
5. Budget Constraints
o Defense budget is below 1.5% of GDP.
o Modern jets, ships, and tanks are expensive, and Malaydesh must prioritize social and economic programs.
6. Procurement Scandals & Mismanagement
o The LCS scandal is the biggest example: billions spent, no ships delivered.
o Procurement decisions often influenced by politics instead of operational needs.
7. Over-Reliance on Foreign Suppliers
o Lack of a strong domestic defense industry means Malaydesh must import equipment.
o Currency fluctuations and sanctions (e.g., Russia) complicate maintenance.
8. Shifting Political Priorities
o Every new government tends to change defense priorities.
o Long-term projects (like the MRCA) get delayed or canceled.
=============
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
2025 : RM1.73 trillion, or 85.8% of GDP GDP
⚠️ CONSEQUENCES OF POLICY FLIP-FLOPS IN MALAYDESH ’S MILITARY
BalasHapus1. Delayed Modernization
• Procurement Paralysis: Repeated changes in aircraft or equipment acquisition plans (e.g., MRCA selection delays) stall modernization.
• Outdated Capabilities: The RMAF and other branches continue operating aging platforms while waiting for decisions that keep shifting.
2. Loss of Strategic Credibility
• Regional Perception: Neighbors like Singapore and Indonesia view Malaydesh as indecisive, weakening its deterrence posture.
• Diplomatic Strain: Defense partners may hesitate to offer technology transfers or joint exercises due to uncertainty in Malaydesh ’s commitments.
3. Economic and Industrial Impact
• Defense Industry Stagnation: Local companies struggle to grow when policies change midstream, affecting contracts and R&D investments.
• Investor Hesitation: Foreign defense firms may avoid long-term partnerships due to unpredictable procurement behavior.
4. Operational Inefficiency
• Training Disruptions: Constant changes in equipment plans mean personnel training is inconsistent or mismatched with future platforms.
• Logistics Complexity: A mixed fleet from different origins (Russian, American, European) becomes harder to maintain without a clear roadmap.
5. Budget Waste
• Sunk Costs: Funds spent on feasibility studies, negotiations, or partial upgrades are wasted when plans are scrapped.
• Emergency Purchases: Flip-flops often lead to rushed acquisitions (e.g., used jets) that are less cost-effective and harder to integrate.
🧭 Real-World Example: MRCA Procurement
Malaydesh ’s MRCA program has seen years of indecision:
• Originally planned to replace MiG-29s in the early 2010s.
• Considered Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen, and Super Hornet—but no final decision.
• Now exploring used Kuwaiti Hornets as a stopgap.
This indecision has left the RMAF with a capability gap and weakened its regional air power status.
=============
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
2025 : RM1.73 trillion, or 85.8% of GDP GDP
5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
BalasHapus1. Procurement Mismanagement
• The project began in 2011, with a contract awarded to Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) to build 6 ships.
• By 2022, despite RM6.08 billion already spent, not a single ship had been delivered.
• Poor oversight and lack of accountability led to cost overruns and schedule slippage.
2. Design Changes Midway
• The original plan was to use the MEKO A-100 design from France.
• Midway, the Navy requested changes to combat systems and sensors, causing delays in integration and testing.
• These changes required re-certification and re-engineering, adding years to the timeline.
3. Supply Chain & OEM Issues
• Delays in receiving components from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) disrupted construction schedules.
• Some systems were not delivered on time, while others were incompatible with the revised ship design.
4. Financial Overruns
Metric Original Plan Current Status
Total Cost RM9 billion RM11.22 billion
Ships Ordered 6 5 (1 cancelled)
Completion Timeline 2019–2023 2026–2029
The cost ballooned by RM2.22 billion, forcing the government to scale down the number of ships.
5. Political & Institutional Delays
• Multiple changes in government between 2018–2022 led to policy uncertainty.
• Investigations by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) revealed serious lapses in governance.
• The project was temporarily frozen, then restarted under a restructured plan.
6. Impact on National Security
• Experts warn that the delay leaves Malaydesh vulnerable in its maritime zones, especially in the South China Sea.
• The Navy lacks modern surface combatants to replace aging ships like the KD Kasturi and KD Lekir
5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
BalasHapus📌 1. Air Force (RMAF)
a. MiG-29 Replacement / MRCA Program
• Planned: Since 2007, Malaydesh has sought replacements for its aging MiG-29 Fulcrums.
• Options considered: Rafale (France), Eurofighter Typhoon (UK), Gripen (Sweden), F/A-18 (US).
• Status: Repeatedly delayed, suspended, and re-announced due to budget constraints and changing governments.
• Impact:
o MiG-29 retired in 2017 → fighter gap remains.
o RMAF left relying on only 18 Su-30MKM and 8 F/A-18D, both aging.
o MRCA “shelved” and replaced with smaller Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) plan (FA-50 from South Korea, delivery starting 2026).
________________________________________
b. Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA)
• Planned: Requirement identified since early 2000s to monitor South China Sea and piracy.
• Status: Delayed nearly 20 years.
• Only in 2023 was the Leonardo ATR-72 MPA selected (delivery by 2026).
• Impact:
o Malaydesh had no dedicated MPA fleet for decades, relying on converted transport aircraft and UAVs.
o Limited maritime surveillance → weakness in South China Sea patrols.
________________________________________
📌 2. Navy (RMN)
a. Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal
• Planned: 2011, RM9 billion for 6 Gowind-class ships (local build by Boustead Naval Shipyard).
• Status: By 2025, zero ships delivered.
o Design changes, corruption, mismanagement, and cost overruns stalled the project.
• Impact:
o Navy still depends on old Kedah-class (2006) and even older corvettes from the 1980s.
o Weakens ability to secure South China Sea claims.
________________________________________
b. Multi-Role Support Ship (MRSS)
• Planned: Amphibious ship program since 2000s.
• Status: Cancelled/postponed multiple times due to budget.
• Impact:
o RMN has no large amphibious lift → limited ability to move troops/equipment in regional crises.
________________________________________
c. Second Batch of Scorpène Submarines
• Planned: Expansion to 4 submarines.
• Status: Shelved due to cost.
• Impact:
o Malaydesh stuck with just 2 Scorpènes (delivered 2009–2010), insufficient for wide maritime area.
________________________________________
📌 3. Army (TDM)
a. Self-Propelled Howitzers (SPH)
• Planned: SPH requirement since early 2000s (to replace old towed artillery).
• Status: Program repeatedly delayed. Korea’s K9 Thunder shortlisted in 2020s, but no final contract.
• Impact: Army artillery remains outdated → reduced firepower compared to Indonesia, Singapore.
________________________________________
b. Armored Vehicle Programs
• AV-8 Gempita: Entered production in 2014, but scaled down from 257 planned units due to cost.
• Condor APC Replacement: Long planned, but repeatedly delayed → Condors from the 1980s still in service.
________________________________________
c. Rotary Wing (Helicopters)
• Army Aviation requested more utility and attack helicopters.
• Programs for attack helicopters (AH-1Z, T129, etc.) discussed but cancelled/delayed.
• Impact: Army lacks dedicated attack helicopter capability, unlike Indonesia.
________________________________________
📌 4. Reasons for Delay/Failure
1. Budget constraints → defense stuck at ~1% of GDP.
2. Political instability → 5 prime ministers between 2018–2025, each with shifting priorities.
3. Corruption & mismanagement → especially visible in LCS.
4. Overreliance on foreign suppliers → negotiations stall or get too expensive.
5. Short-termism → lack of 10–15 year strategic procurement planning.
________________________________________
📌 5. Consequences
• Capability gaps:
o Air surveillance weak (delayed MPAs, fighter gap).
o Maritime security weak (LCS delay, only 2 submarines).
o Ground firepower weak (delayed SPH, old APCs).
• Readiness reduced: much equipment obsolete, with few modern replacements.
• Regional imbalance: Neighbors like Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam modernize faster, leaving Malaydesh behind
Mana tuh geng beruk 1Q999 yg sok bilang kontrak kosong
BalasHapusMwm
Gemprok
Selama heli masih sewa versi akan ttender hahahha
Kitta sign kontrak kosonG jadi REAL
NO BUAL
WKKWKWKW
SALAM IQ 9999 SMART BUT IDIOT😭😭😭
GENK BOTOL SOTOMIE MALONDESH CUMA BISA SHOPPING RECEHAN MAKLUM NEGARA KISMIN 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusKita sudah sign LOI shooping 24 M346
BalasHapusHahahaha..just see n wait ya lon
Malaysewa mau sewa apalagi gempur & MMW ? 🤔😅😅😅
BalasHapusSewa aja byk kajian dan tender
HapusWkwkw
Kontrrak pesawat tempur indo
BalasHapusRafale 42 unit + add 18 biji
KAAN gen 5 48 unit
M346 24 unit LOI
Mallon menangis koyak hati 😭😭😭
"FAKTA BELUM TAHU, BACA MALAS, MENGAJI TAK MAU, DIBILANG BODOH MARAH"
BalasHapusTANIAH PAPANON SOTOMIE.......😅😅😅😅😅😅
Ucapan PAPANON di Program TEMU ANWAR @ TAR UMT
https://youtu.be/DRWoMQYtpDI
5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
BalasHapus💰 1. Budget Composition Skewed Toward Salaries and Maintenance
• In 2024, Malaydesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o RM8.2 billion (~41.5%) went to salaries and allowances.
o RM5.8 billion was earmarked for maintenance and asset upkeep.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, and infrastructure.
Impact: The lion’s share of the budget sustains personnel and legacy systems, leaving little for new combat capabilities.
📦 2. Procurement Budget Includes Legacy Payments
• The RM5.71 billion procurement allocation in 2024 isn’t entirely for new systems. It includes:
o Scheduled payments for previously signed contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets from South Korea, A400M upgrades).
o Progressive payments for delayed projects like the Maharaja Lela-class Littoral Combat Ships.
o Small-scale purchases (e.g. small arms, radios, support vehicles).
Impact: The actual discretionary funding for new combat platforms is far lower than it appears on paper.
📉 3. Currency Depreciation Erodes Purchasing Power
• Malaydesh sources most of its advanced systems from foreign OEMs (e.g. France, UK, South Korea).
• The depreciation of the ringgit against major currencies means that even modest increases in nominal budget do not translate into real gains.
Impact: Malaydesh pays more for the same equipment, reducing the volume and quality of new acquisitions.
🧱 4. No Multi-Year Strategic Investment Framework
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, Malaydesh lacks a ring-fenced capital investment stream for defense.
• Each year’s procurement is subject to political negotiation and fiscal trade-offs, with no guaranteed continuity.
• This discourages long-term programs like missile development, drone fleets, or integrated air defense systems.
Impact: Strategic programs are fragmented, delayed, or abandoned mid-cycle.
📊 Summary Table: Why Funding for New Combat Systems Is Thin
Factor Description Strategic Impact
Budget skew 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance Minimal room for new acquisitions
Legacy obligations Procurement includes old contracts and delayed projects New systems get crowded out
Currency depreciation Ringgit weakens against USD/EUR Reduces real purchasing power
No strategic investment model No multi-year capital planning Limits continuity and ambition
Baruu lagi mau big shopping...semakin hampir
BalasHapusDitunggu Gari Gari hahhhaay
Mamamia
"...Leonardo, PT ESystem Solutions and the Ministry of Defence Of the Republic of Indonesia sign M-346 F AIRCRAFT Letter of Intent to meet Indonesian Air Force training and combat requirements
Rome, 04 February 2026 07:38
https://www.leonardo.com/en/press-release-detail/-/detail/04-02-2026-leonardo-pt-esystem-solutions-and-the-ministry-of-defence-of-the-republic-of-indonesia-sign-m-346-f-aircraft-letter-of-intent-to-meet-indonesian-air-force-training-and-combat-requirements?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQPMjc1MjU0NjkyNTk4Mjc5AAEeVy_x8q2IGWoZXQl4JBhfNauJafVz4Z5PE1w3EiHRaaKFQW3UYgoYaw4SjtM_aem_iP5aY0lTIZYBdUskI9SFuQ
Ntar ada DUO malaysdesh yang negative framing terhadap INDONESIA atas Project Procurement M-346 Block 20 dengan angkat issue:
BalasHapus1. Masih LoI
2. Kontrak Kosong
3. Pembiayaan Skema Hutang Luar Negeri
4. Dan lain lain
Konklusi
Sakit Hati dan IRI DENGKI malaysdesh sudah menjadi karakter
Kesian BOEING di PRANK sama negara MISKIN.... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusApa sign kontrak 24 buah F15...? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusSI MISKIN NGEPRANK BOEING guys... 🤣🤣🤣
SUKA KLAIM ya..? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusMenhan Prabowo Resmi Beli 24 Unit Jet F-15 EX Eagle
https://nasional.tvrinews.com/berita/tbeup2d-menhan-prabowo-resmi-beli-24-unit-jet-f-15-ex-eagle#
SUKA KLAIM ya..? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusMenhan Prabowo Resmi Beli 24 Unit Jet F-15 EX Eagle
https://nasional.tvrinews.com/berita/tbeup2d-menhan-prabowo-resmi-beli-24-unit-jet-f-15-ex-eagle#
Sakit hati ya gak dpt hornet
HapusWkkwkkww
GOIB
Indo beli senjata ke Nato..NO US
BalasHapusNO SOURCE CODE WKKWW
BYE MALON
SHOPING BUAL CASH WKKWKW
Nwgara miskin bisa beli
BalasHapusRafale
Kaan gen 5
Byk lagi
Wkwkkww
42 Rafale
BalasHapus48 Kaan
24 M 346
Woooww.Hormet makin krik krikk
Biasa malon just PEMBUAL🤣🤣🤣
Up berita terbaru admin.... Kerjasama pertahanan MALAYSIA - JERMAN... ada bau bau shoping ASET MADE IN JERMAN ni tau..... HOREYYYY... 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
BalasHapusMalaysia-Jerman perkukuh hubungan pertahanan, sasar muktamadkan JDOI
https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/766669/berita/nasional/malaysia-jerman-perkukuh-hubungan-pertahanan-sasar-muktamadkan-jdoi