HMS Anson has arrived at Western Australia’s HMAS Stirling for the first‑ever maintenance activity on a United Kingdom nuclear‑powered submarine in Australia, marking a historic step in our nation’s readiness to operate and maintain conventionally‑armed, nuclear‑powered submarines.
Over the coming weeks, Australian personnel will work alongside partners from the United Kingdom (UK) and United States (US) on maintenance and familiarisation activities on the Astute-class submarine.
Around 100 personnel will contribute to the UK Submarine Maintenance Period (UK SMP) including members of the Royal Navy, the UK Submarine Delivery Agency, Royal Australian Navy, ASC Pty Ltd, and Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard.
This builds on previous work completed on US Virginia-class submarines USS Vermont in 2025 and USS Hawaii in 2024, and strengthens the skills, systems and supply chains required for routine maintenance of nuclear‑powered submarines.
Participation in the UK SMP represents another significant milestone in the lead up to the establishment of Submarine Rotational Force–West at HMAS Stirling from 2027 and will further build Australia’s familiarity with UK-designed submarines as the nation prepares to begin construction of SSN-AUKUS in Adelaide by the end of the decade.
Two Royal Australian Navy officers have been embedded aboard HMS Anson, gaining invaluable operational experience on a conventionally-armed, nuclear‑powered submarine.
More than 50 Australians are now embedded within the UK Defence Nuclear Enterprise, and the Royal Navy has provided offshore nuclear safety training to over 950 Australian Submarine Agency personnel.
The presence of HMS Anson also provides another opportunity to test and strengthen Australia’s nuclear stewardship systems, drawing on the world-leading safety practices of AUKUS partners.
During the HMS Anson visit, AUKUS partners will also undertake a combined AUKUS Pillar I and Pillar II activity, testing the interoperability of the Australian Speartooth large uncrewed underwater vehicle (LUUV) with the UK SSN, and assessing and enhancing AUKUS Pillar II anti-submarine warfare AI algorithms fitted to the RAAF P-8A Poseidon.
Quotes attributable to Deputy Prime Minister, Richard Marles:
“Australia’s acquisition of a nuclear-powered submarine capability will create jobs, strengthen our local industry and help keep Australians safe.
“This Submarine Maintenance Period is the latest demonstration of the continued momentum across all three partners to deliver AUKUS.
“Australia, the UK and the US will work together over the coming weeks on the maintenance of HMS Anson – developing our skills, systems and infrastructure as we prepare for Submarine Rotational Force–West to begin next year.”
Quotes attributable to Minister for Defence Industry, Pat Conroy:
“This is an important milestone that will build confidence in our strategic partners that we have the workforce able to deliver AUKUS submarines, and also lays ground for more jobs for locals.
“Alongside our AUKUS teammates, our workforce and industry partners are moving with purpose to accelerate Australia’s future nuclear-powered submarine capability.
“AUKUS partners are working together to achieve real operational benefits today, faster than we can working alone.”
(Aus DoD)
OUTSTANDING BORDER PROBLEMS (OPB) TAMBAH WILAYAH .....
BalasHapusINDONESIA 5.207 Hektar (52,07 Kilometer Persegi)
-
INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
GOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
DEFISIT : 2,9%
GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
=============
=============
TAMBAH WILAYAH .....
MALAYDESH 780 Hektar (7,8 Kilometer Persegi)
-
MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
DEFISIT : 3,8%
GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
-
DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : INCREASE DEBT
DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : INCREASE DEBT
2029 = 438,09 BILLION USD
2028 = 412,2 BILLION USD
2027 = 386,51 BILLION USD
2026 = 362,19 BILLION USD
2025 = 338,75 BILLION USD
2024 = 316,15 BILLION USD
2023 = 293,83 BILLION USD
2022 = 271,49 BILLION USD
2021 = 247,49 BILLION USD
2020 = 221,49 BILLION USD
-
DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : DEBT PAY DEBT
DATA STATISTA 2029-2020 : OVERLIMIT DEBT
2029 = 69,54% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2028 = 69,34% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2027 = 68,8% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2026 = 68,17% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2025 = 68,07% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2024 = 68,38% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2023 = 69,76% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2022 = 65,5% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2021 = 69,16% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
2020 = 67,69% DEBT RATIO TO GDP
-
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
The Finance Ministry stated that the aggregate national household DEBT stood at RM1.53 trillion between 2018 and 2023. In aggregate, it said the household DEBT for 2022 was RM1.45 trillion, followed by RM1.38 trillion (2021,) RM1.32 trillion (2020), RM1.25 trillion (2019) and RM1.19 trillion (2018). “The ratio of household DEBT to gross domestic product (GDP) at the end of 2023 also slightly increased to 84.3% compared with 82% in 2018,” it said.
-
BNM = HOUSEHOLD DEBT IS ONE OF THE HIGHEST IN THE ASEAN ......
MALAYDESH household DEBT is one of the highest in the ASEAN region. Against this backdrop, Bank Negara MALAYDESH (BNM) safeguards financial stability by monitoring and regulating the lending activity of all financial institutions in MALAYDESH , among other things.
😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝
INDONESIA = BATAS LIMIT 60%
BalasHapusGOV. DEBT : 40% OF GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 16% OF GDP
DEFISIT : 2,9%
GDP = USD 1,44 TRILIUN
=============
=============
MALAYDESH = BATAS LIMIT 65%
GOV. DEBT : 69% OF GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84,3% OF GDP
DEFISIT : 3,8%
GDP = USD 416,90 MILIAR
5X PM 6X MOD = 2026 FREEZES - 2023 CANCELLED
-
Dependence on Foreign Defense Suppliers
• Malaydesh imports nearly all high-tech defense equipment:
o Jets from Russia, U.S., South Korea.
o Submarines & ships from France.
o Armored vehicles in partnership with Turkey.
• Spare parts and upgrades depend on foreign suppliers, making maintenance costly and vulnerable to sanctions or political disputes.
• Example: MiG-29s retired early due to lack of spare parts.
• Result: Malaydesh has limited strategic autonomy in defense.
________________________________________
Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities
• Malaydesh faces cyber threats from state actors, hackers, and extremist groups.
• Weaknesses:
o Limited investment in cyber defense.
o Few trained cyber specialists.
o Weak integration of cyber defense with traditional military operations.
• Rising threat of hybrid warfare (information warfare, disinformation, espionage) in South China Sea disputes.
• Result: Malaydesh risks having its critical systems disrupted in a conflict.
________________________________________
Corruption & Procurement Scandals
• Defense procurement plagued by corruption and mismanagement:
o Scorpène Submarine Deal (2002): RM 500 million in commissions.
o Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal (2011–present): RM 9 billion spent, no ships delivered as of 2025.
• Middlemen and commissions inflate costs, reduce the number of assets purchased.
• Political interference often overrides military requirements.
• Result: Billions wasted, modernization delayed, public trust eroded.
________________________________________
Overstretch Due to Non-Traditional Roles
• MAF frequently tasked with:
o Disaster relief (floods, earthquakes).
o Border control (illegal migrants, smuggling).
o Counterterrorism (Abu Sayyaf threat in Sabah).
o Pandemic support (COVID-19 operations).
• These tasks divert focus and resources from conventional defense.
• With limited assets, balancing both traditional and non-traditional roles is difficult.
• Result: Military readiness for external threats is weakened.
________________________________________
✅ Summary
The Malaydesh n Armed Forces face nine interconnected problems:
1. Outdated equipment → modernization delayed for decades.
2. Low defense budget → insufficient for high-tech upgrades.
3. Maritime security challenges → China & piracy overstretch Navy.
4. Recruitment & retention issues → talent drain in technical fields.
5. Weak inter-service integration → poor joint operations capability.
6. Dependence on foreign suppliers → costly, politically risky.
7. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities → exposed to hybrid threats.
8. Corruption & scandals → billions wasted, modernization crippled.
9. Overstretch from non-traditional roles → weak focus on external defense.
LONTONG GEDE BENER ITU 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusOn the job training buat personel RAN?
BalasHapusMumpung bakal dapat kapal selam buatan Inggris, kayaknya lebih bermanfaat daripada pas Virginia-class nongkrong di sana.
This analysis of AUKUS entering a new era with the UK’s expanded role adds a lot of clarity to how strategic defense partnerships are evolving. It’s interesting to see how geopolitical decisions are influenced by long-term planning and resource allocation. Breaking down complex topics like this into clear explanations makes big ideas easier to understand — much like how students facing tough coursework in areas like economics or financial analysis often seek Finance assignment help to better grasp concepts and improve their confidence in academic work.
BalasHapusDrone kamikaze Indonesia tepat sasaran, sesuai target
BalasHapushttps://youtube.com/shorts/R6qOxMzU6j0?si=TTsEj4Sg1CpU7GZ5