Bot kelas Ibrahim (photo: MMEA)
PUTRAJAYA – Sambutan Hari Kebangsaan ke-68 hari ini mencatat sejarah tersendiri apabila Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia (Maritim Malaysia) buat julung kali mempamerkan Bot Kelas Ibrahim yang menjadi simbol sokongan Yang di-Pertuan Agong terhadap keselamatan maritim negara.
Ketua Pengarah Maritim Malaysia, Laksamana Maritim Datuk Haji Mohd Rosli bin Abdullah memaklumkan, bot yang dikurniakan Seri Paduka Baginda Sultan Ibrahim dibina khas oleh Royal Boat Hangar Johor dan telah diserahkan kepada Maritim Malaysia pada 6 Mac lalu.
Tegas beliau, penyerahan itu melambangkan iltizam Seri Paduka Baginda dalam memperkukuh kawalan perairan negara sekaligus meletakkan kepercayaan penuh kepada Agensi ini dalam menjaga keselamatan perairan negara.
Kelajuan maksimum 56 knot
“Bot sepanjang 12.6 meter dengan lebar 3.5 meter ini diperbuat daripada aluminium marin berkualiti tinggi serta dipacu tiga enjin Mercury OBM (Outboard Motor) berkuasa 300 kuasa kuda setiap satu.”
“Ia mampu mencapai kelajuan maksimum 56 knot, dan kelajuan pelayaran optimum ialah 40 knot menjadikannya antara bot pemintas berkelajuan tinggi yang dimiliki Maritim Malaysia,” katanya lagi.
Beliau berkata demikian ketika ditemui selepas hadir pada Majlis Sambutan Hari Kebangsaan Ke-68 di Dataran Putrajaya, pagi tadi.
Bot kelas Ibrahim (photo: Utusan Sarawak)
Sambutan Hari Kebangsaan diserikan dengan keberangkatan Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan Raja Permaisuri Agong, serta dihadiri YAB Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim dan dua Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid bin Hamidi dan Datuk Seri Fadillah bin Yusof.
Mengulas lanjut mengenai bot berkenaan, Datuk Haji Mohd Rosli menjelaskan, bot tersebut dipinjamkan tanpa kos selama lima tahun dan bot berkenaan telah diserahkan kepada Maritim Negeri Johor untuk memperkukuh rondaan dan operasi penguatkuasaan di perairan strategik negeri tersebut.
Selain Bot Kelas Ibrahim, Maritim Malaysia turut menampilkan pasukan elit Rescue Swimmer (Perenang Penyelamat) yang berperanan melaksanakan misi menyelamat di laut dalam keadaan ekstrem. Setakat ini, pasukan itu mempunyai kekuatan 11 anggota operasi dan 12 lagi dalam latihan.
Dalam pada itu, Datuk Haji Mohd Rosli memaklumkan jenayah maritim termasuk penyeludupan manusia, pencerobohan nelayan asing dan penyeludupan dadah menunjukkan trend penurunan.
“Perairan negara kita berada pada tahap aman dan terkawal. Walaupun ada insiden berlaku, jumlahnya semakin berkurangan hasil kerjasama erat Maritim Malaysia dengan Pasukan Polis Marin serta Tentera Laut Diraja Malaysia,” ujar beliau lagi.
Terdahulu, kontinjen Maritim Malaysia dengan 327 pegawai dan anggota dari Maritim Negeri, Pasukan Tindakan Khas dan Penyelamat (STAR Team), Penerbang Maritim Malaysia, Akademi Maritim Sultan Ahmad Shah (AMSAS) lengkap dengan enam jenis pakaian rasmi telah bersama-sama mengikuti perbarisan pada sambutan tersebut.
Selain itu, turut serta Pasukan Pancaragam Maritim Malaysia terdiri dari 40 anggota di samping beberapa buah aset lain turut diperagakan seperti Bot PERKASA 36, Bot BENTENG 2, Air Boat 03, Mobile Surveillance Unit (MSU) serta Helikopter Dauphin AS365 N3.
(APMM)
ðī️ 1. Entrenched Role of Middlemen
BalasHapus• Defense contracts are frequently brokered by agents or intermediaries, many of whom are retired military officers or politically connected individuals.
• These middlemen often act as gatekeepers between the Ministry of Defence and foreign suppliers, adding layers of cost and complexity.
• According to analysts, this system is deeply entrenched and has become an “open secret” in Malaysia’s defense ecosystem.
Impact: Prices are inflated, procurement timelines are extended, and transparency is compromised.
ð§ą 2. Opaque Tendering and Limited Competition
• Fewer than one-third of major defense contracts are awarded through open competition.
• Most deals are conducted via single-source or limited tenders, which favor firms with insider access or political leverage.
• This environment allows deal structuring to be influenced by non-technical considerations, including patronage and lobbying.
Impact: Merit-based selection is sidelined, and cost-effectiveness suffers.
ð️ 3. Politically Connected Firms Dominate
• Many defense contractors have ex-military figures on their boards, giving them privileged access to decision-makers.
• These firms often win contracts despite offering older platforms or substandard equipment—as seen in the attempted purchase of 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which Malaysia’s King publicly condemned as “flying coffins”2.
• The King also rebuked “agents” and “salesmen” in the Ministry of Defence, warning that inflated middleman pricing would render the defense budget perpetually insufficient.
Impact: Public funds are wasted, and the armed forces receive outdated or unsuitable equipment.
ð 4. Consequences for Readiness and Reform
• Inflated costs mean fewer assets can be acquired, and maintenance budgets are squeezed.
• The lack of transparency erodes public trust and makes it difficult for oversight bodies like the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to hold officials accountable.
• While the King’s intervention led to the cancellation of the Black Hawk deal, systemic reform remains elusive.
ð Summary Table: How Middlemen & Opaque Deals Inflate Costs
Mechanism Description Consequence
Middlemen Agents with insider access broker deals Inflated prices, longer timelines
Limited tendering Few contracts awarded via open competition Reduced transparency, poor value
Politically connected firms Ex-military or political figures dominate contractor space Patronage, outdated equipment
Lack of oversight Weak enforcement and redacted audits Mismanagement persists
ðī️ 1. Entrenched Role of Middlemen
BalasHapus• Defense contracts are frequently brokered by agents or intermediaries, many of whom are retired military officers or politically connected individuals.
• These middlemen often act as gatekeepers between the Ministry of Defence and foreign suppliers, adding layers of cost and complexity.
• According to analysts, this system is deeply entrenched and has become an “open secret” in Malaysia’s defense ecosystem.
Impact: Prices are inflated, procurement timelines are extended, and transparency is compromised.
ð§ą 2. Opaque Tendering and Limited Competition
• Fewer than one-third of major defense contracts are awarded through open competition.
• Most deals are conducted via single-source or limited tenders, which favor firms with insider access or political leverage.
• This environment allows deal structuring to be influenced by non-technical considerations, including patronage and lobbying.
Impact: Merit-based selection is sidelined, and cost-effectiveness suffers.
ð️ 3. Politically Connected Firms Dominate
• Many defense contractors have ex-military figures on their boards, giving them privileged access to decision-makers.
• These firms often win contracts despite offering older platforms or substandard equipment—as seen in the attempted purchase of 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which Malaysia’s King publicly condemned as “flying coffins”2.
• The King also rebuked “agents” and “salesmen” in the Ministry of Defence, warning that inflated middleman pricing would render the defense budget perpetually insufficient.
Impact: Public funds are wasted, and the armed forces receive outdated or unsuitable equipment.
ð 4. Consequences for Readiness and Reform
• Inflated costs mean fewer assets can be acquired, and maintenance budgets are squeezed.
• The lack of transparency erodes public trust and makes it difficult for oversight bodies like the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to hold officials accountable.
• While the King’s intervention led to the cancellation of the Black Hawk deal, systemic reform remains elusive.
ð Summary Table: How Middlemen & Opaque Deals Inflate Costs
Mechanism Description Consequence
Middlemen Agents with insider access broker deals Inflated prices, longer timelines
Limited tendering Few contracts awarded via open competition Reduced transparency, poor value
Politically connected firms Ex-military or political figures dominate contractor space Patronage, outdated equipment
Lack of oversight Weak enforcement and redacted audits Mismanagement persists
ð 1. Accelerated Modernization by Neighbors
BalasHapus• Singapore maintains one of the most technologically advanced militaries in Southeast Asia, with investments in F-15SG fighters, submarines, and integrated air defense systems.
• Indonesia has ramped up procurement of Rafale jets, frigates, and drones, aiming for a more balanced tri-service force.
• Vietnam has focused on asymmetric capabilities, acquiring Kilo-class submarines, coastal missile systems, and modernizing its air defense.
• Philippines is deepening defense ties with the US, Japan, and Australia, acquiring BrahMos missiles and upgrading its naval fleet.
Result: Malaysia risks falling behind in both conventional and hybrid warfare capabilities2.
ð 2. Malaysia’s Budget Bottleneck
• Malaysia’s defense budget has stagnated at RM15–18 billion annually, with 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance, leaving little for modernization.
• Major projects like the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program have been plagued by delays and scandals, further eroding trust and capability.
Result: While neighbors invest in future-ready systems, Malaysia struggles to maintain legacy platforms.
ð 3. Strategic Exposure in the South China Sea
• China’s coast guard and maritime militia have repeatedly entered Malaysia’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), testing its maritime sovereignty.
• Malaysia’s aging naval fleet—28 of 34 vessels are over 40 years old—limits its ability to respond effectively.
Result: Malaysia’s deterrence posture is weakened, especially in contested maritime zones.
ð§ 4. Diplomatic vs. Hard Power Approach
• Malaysia has traditionally relied on quiet diplomacy and ASEAN mechanisms to manage regional tensions.
• However, the geopolitical landscape is shifting toward hard power signaling, with countries like the Philippines and Vietnam adopting more assertive defense postures.
Result: Malaysia’s soft approach is increasingly outpaced by neighbors who combine diplomacy with credible military strength.
ð Summary Table: Malaysia vs. Regional Peers
Country Modernization Focus Strategic Advantage Over Malaysia
Singapore High-tech platforms, integrated C4ISR Superior air/naval integration
Indonesia Balanced tri-service upgrades Larger force, expanding reach
Vietnam Asymmetric coastal defense Strong deterrence in South China Sea
Philippines Allied-backed modernization Rapid capability growth, joint exercises
Malaysia Aging inventory, budget constraints Limited deterrence, slow procurement
Kasihan...ðððĪĢðĪĢðĪŠðð§ðĐððĪ
BalasHapusSudahlah kecil comel, ompong pula..
BalasHapusðððĪĢðĪĢðĪŠðð§ðĐððĪ
Serius laah min...ðððĪĢðĪŠðð§ðĐð
BalasHapusItu kapal BOAT PANCING IKAN TONGKOL dan CUMI-CUMI Malondesh, right?
BalasHapusKasihan.. Bot pengangkut SAYURAN hasil pinjaman... Wkwkwkwkw
BalasHapusMana f18 GAGAL TOTAL ya... Wkwkwkwðððð
Kasihan.. Bot pengangkut SAYURAN MALON itu pun hasil pinjaman... Wkwkwkwkw
BalasHapusMana f18 GAGAL TOTAL ya... Wkwkwkwðððð
Kasihan.. Bot pengangkut SAYURAN MALON itu pun hasil pinjaman... Wkwkwkwkw
BalasHapusMana f18 GAGAL TOTAL ya... Wkwkwkwðððð
Kasihan.. Bot pengangkut SAYURAN MALON itu pun hasil pinjaman... Wkwkwkwkw
BalasHapusMana f18 GAGAL TOTAL ya... Wkwkwkwðððð
Kasihan.. Bot pengangkut SAYURAN MALON itu pun hasil pinjaman... Wkwkwkwkw
BalasHapusMana f18 GAGAL TOTAL ya... Wkwkwkwðððð
Hasil Sedekah YDA ....kasihan Maritim Malaydesh....
BalasHapusðŦ 1. No Long-Range Strike Systems
BalasHapus• Malaysia does not possess ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, or standoff precision-guided munitions.
• Its air force lacks platforms capable of launching deep-strike missions. The Su-30MKM fighters have range and payload potential, but Malaysia has not equipped them with long-range strike munitions like Kh-59 or BrahMos.
• Naval assets are similarly limited—no ship-launched cruise missiles or land-attack capabilities exist.
Impact: Malaysia cannot credibly threaten retaliation against adversaries beyond its borders, reducing its strategic leverage.
ðĄ️ 2. Deterrence by Denial, Not Punishment
• Malaysia’s defense doctrine emphasizes “concentric deterrence”, focusing on denial rather than punishment.
• This means the strategy is built around preventing aggression, not retaliating against it.
• While this suits peacetime stability, it’s increasingly inadequate in a region where China, Vietnam, and the Philippines are investing in deterrence-by-punishment capabilities.
Impact: Malaysia lacks escalation control and cannot impose costs on adversaries, weakening its deterrent posture.
ðļ 3. Budget Priorities Undermine Capability Development
• Over 60–70% of Malaysia’s defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations.
• This leaves minimal room for R&D, procurement of advanced weapons, or strategic force development.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal and delays have further eroded trust and diverted resources from strategic programs.
Impact: Malaysia is stuck in a cycle of maintaining legacy systems rather than investing in future capabilities.
ð 4. No Indigenous Missile or Strategic Weapons Program
• Unlike regional peers such as Indonesia (which is co-developing missiles with Turkey) or Vietnam (which fields Russian cruise missiles), Malaysia has no domestic missile development program.
• It also lacks partnerships for co-production or licensed manufacturing of strategic weapons.
Impact: Total dependence on foreign suppliers; no autonomy in strategic force planning.
ð Summary Table: Strategic Strike & Deterrence Weaknesses
Weakness Description Strategic Impact
No long-range strike systems No cruise, ballistic, or standoff weapons Cannot retaliate or shape adversary behavior
Denial-based doctrine Focus on defense, not punishment Weak deterrence posture
Budget constraints Most funds go to salaries and maintenance No room for strategic force development
No indigenous capability No missile R&D or co-production High dependency, low autonomy
ð° 1. Budget Composition: Operational vs Development
BalasHapus• In 2025, Malaysia allocated RM21.2 billion to the Ministry of Defence.
o Operational Expenditure (OPEX): RM13.36 billion (~63%) — covers salaries, pensions, allowances, and day-to-day operations.
o Development Expenditure (DE): RM7.49 billion (~37%) — intended for asset acquisition, infrastructure, and modernization.
Impact: The bulk of funding goes to sustaining the status quo, not building future capabilities.
ðĨ 2. Personnel Costs Dominate Spending
• Salaries, pensions, and welfare programs for active-duty personnel and veterans consume over half of OPEX.
• Initiatives like RKAT housing repairs, pension adjustments, and cost-of-living allowances are important for morale but crowd out capital investment.
• Malaysia’s armed forces have a relatively large administrative footprint compared to its combat strength.
Impact: High fixed costs reduce flexibility for strategic procurement or force restructuring.
ð§ 3. Maintenance Over Modernization
• RM5.8 billion in 2025 was earmarked for maintenance, repair, and acquisition of military assets.
• However, most of this goes to keeping aging platforms operational, not acquiring new ones.
• Example: The Royal Malaysian Navy spends heavily on maintaining ships that are 30–40 years old, with minimal upgrades.
Impact: Funds are spent on patching legacy systems rather than leapfrogging to modern technologies.
ð 4. Low R&D and Capability Investment
• Malaysia allocates negligible funding to defense R&D, indigenous production, or strategic systems (e.g. missiles, cyber, ISR).
• Unlike peers such as Indonesia or Vietnam, Malaysia has no major co-development programs or defense industrial offsets.
Impact: Malaysia remains dependent on foreign suppliers and lacks autonomy in capability planning.
ð Summary Table: Budget Allocation Weaknesses
Category Description Strategic Impact
Operational Expenditure RM13.36B for salaries, pensions, and operations Limits modernization and flexibility
Personnel Costs High welfare and admin spending Crowds out combat capability investment
Maintenance Focus RM5.8B for upkeep of aging assets Sustains outdated platforms
Low R&D Investment Minimal funding for innovation or strategic systems No indigenous capability development
ð 1. Ambitious Policy Documents with Limited Follow-Through
BalasHapus• Malondesh’s first Defence White Paper (DWP), launched in 2019, laid out a 10-year roadmap for force modernization, defense industry reform, and multi-domain readiness.
• It proposed initiatives like:
o A revised National Military Strategy
o A Defence Capacity Plan
o A National Defence Industry Policy
• However, by 2021–2025, many of these remained in draft form or unimplemented, with only partial progress on cyber and air surveillance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic clarity exists, but execution lags, creating a credibility gap between policy and reality.
ð°️ 2. Stalled Programs and Missed Timelines
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program is the most glaring example:
o RM9 billion allocated for six ships
o None delivered as of 2025
o Delays linked to mismanagement, redacted audits, and political interference
• Other programs like the Ground-Based Air Defence (GBAD) system and High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV) remain unfunded or stuck in approval stages.
Impact: Operational capability suffers, and the military continues to rely on aging platforms.
ð️ 3. Political Instability and Policy Discontinuity
• Malondesh experienced multiple changes in government between 2020 and 2022, disrupting defense planning cycles.
• Each administration brought new priorities, causing re-scoping, delays, or abandonment of existing programs.
• Even when policies are reaffirmed, bureaucratic inertia and fragmented oversight slow implementation.
Impact: Defense reform lacks continuity, and long-term planning is undermined.
ð§ą 4. Weak Institutional Mechanisms for Execution
• There’s no centralized authority to monitor and enforce defense policy implementation.
• Oversight is split between MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and political leadership, leading to diffused accountability.
• Audit findings are often delayed or redacted, and recommendations go unenforced.
Impact: Programs stall without consequence, and systemic inefficiencies persist.
ð Summary Table: Why Policy Execution Is Weak
Problem Area Description Strategic Impact
Overambitious planning Policies exceed institutional capacity Unrealistic timelines, stalled delivery
Political volatility Frequent leadership changes disrupt continuity Re-scoping and abandonment of programs
Fragmented oversight No unified implementation body Poor accountability and follow-through
Audit suppression Delayed or redacted findings Mismanagement goes unchecked
ð§ Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh’s defense posture remains reactive and maintenance-heavy, not transformation-driven.
• The credibility of future policy documents is weakened unless backed by institutional reform and budget discipline.
• Regional peers like Indonesia and Vietnam are executing modernization plans more consistently, widening the capability gap.
Oh peringatan hari malaya ya ....
BalasHapusPantas rakyat Sabah dan Serawak tidak antusias meyambutnya
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Manakala INDIANESIA.... Makin parah dengan PEMBAKARAN & PENJARAHAN dimana mana..... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusð§ą 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped Defense Industry
Hapus• Malondesh defense industry is overseen by the Malondeshn Defence Industry Council (MDIC), established in 1999 and later expanded into MIDES.
• Despite having six strategic sectors (Aerospace, Maritime, Weaponry, Automotive, ICT, Common-user Equipment), the ecosystem lacks:
o A clear, enforceable blueprint
o Robust infrastructure
o Skilled manpower
• Many local firms are assemblers or subcontractors, not full-spectrum developers. For example, Malondesh still assembles M4 carbines under license, while Indonesia and Singapore produce their own rifles (SS1 and SAR-21 respectively).
Impact: Malondesh cannot independently design, produce, or sustain core military systems.
ð§ 2. Minimal R&D and Technology Investment
• Indigenous R&D in areas like combat management systems (CMS), sensors, and autonomous platforms is nascent and underfunded.
• Studies show that Malondesh lacks structured tendering policies and technology readiness frameworks to support local innovation.
• AI, cyber warfare, and surveillance systems are still in early-stage development, with no operational deployment.
Impact: Malondesh falls behind in emerging tech domains critical to modern warfare.
ð 3. Dependence on Foreign OEMs for Strategic Systems
• Malondesh imports nearly all major platforms:
o Aircraft: Su-30MKM (Russia), FA-50 (South Korea), Hawk (UK)
o Naval systems: ScorpÃĻne submarines (France), LCS (French-German design)
o Missiles: Starstreak (UK), MICA (France), Exocet (France)
• There are no indigenous missile programs, no local radar production, and no domestic armored vehicle design.
Impact: Strategic vulnerability in times of embargo, conflict, or supply chain disruption.
ð 4. Policy Gaps and Execution Failures
• Malondesh has published defense blueprints and industrial strategies, but implementation is weak due to:
o Budget constraints
o Lack of political continuity
o Limited private-sector incentives
• Even promising initiatives like the 15-to-5 naval transformation plan have stalled due to procurement scandals and delivery failures.
Impact: Indigenous capability remains aspirational, not operational.
ð Summary Table: Weaknesses in Indigenous Capability Development
Dimension Description Strategic Impact
Industrial base Fragmented, lacks full-spectrum development No self-reliance in core systems
R&D investment Minimal funding, weak frameworks Falls behind in emerging technologies
Foreign dependency Imports all major platforms and weapons Vulnerable to external shocks
Policy execution Strong on paper, weak in practice Stalled programs and missed timelines
ð§ Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh cannot scale or sustain its military without foreign support.
• It lacks the ability to customize systems to local needs, export defense products, or build strategic depth.
• In contrast, countries like Indonesia (Pindad, PT PAL), Vietnam (Z111 Factory), and Singapore (ST Engineering) have made significant strides in indigenous capability
ð§ą 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped Defense Industry
Hapus• Malondesh defense industry is overseen by the Malondeshn Defence Industry Council (MDIC), established in 1999 and later expanded into MIDES.
• Despite having six strategic sectors (Aerospace, Maritime, Weaponry, Automotive, ICT, Common-user Equipment), the ecosystem lacks:
o A clear, enforceable blueprint
o Robust infrastructure
o Skilled manpower
• Many local firms are assemblers or subcontractors, not full-spectrum developers. For example, Malondesh still assembles M4 carbines under license, while Indonesia and Singapore produce their own rifles (SS1 and SAR-21 respectively).
Impact: Malondesh cannot independently design, produce, or sustain core military systems.
ð§ 2. Minimal R&D and Technology Investment
• Indigenous R&D in areas like combat management systems (CMS), sensors, and autonomous platforms is nascent and underfunded.
• Studies show that Malondesh lacks structured tendering policies and technology readiness frameworks to support local innovation.
• AI, cyber warfare, and surveillance systems are still in early-stage development, with no operational deployment.
Impact: Malondesh falls behind in emerging tech domains critical to modern warfare.
ð 3. Dependence on Foreign OEMs for Strategic Systems
• Malondesh imports nearly all major platforms:
o Aircraft: Su-30MKM (Russia), FA-50 (South Korea), Hawk (UK)
o Naval systems: ScorpÃĻne submarines (France), LCS (French-German design)
o Missiles: Starstreak (UK), MICA (France), Exocet (France)
• There are no indigenous missile programs, no local radar production, and no domestic armored vehicle design.
Impact: Strategic vulnerability in times of embargo, conflict, or supply chain disruption.
ð 4. Policy Gaps and Execution Failures
• Malondesh has published defense blueprints and industrial strategies, but implementation is weak due to:
o Budget constraints
o Lack of political continuity
o Limited private-sector incentives
• Even promising initiatives like the 15-to-5 naval transformation plan have stalled due to procurement scandals and delivery failures.
Impact: Indigenous capability remains aspirational, not operational.
ð Summary Table: Weaknesses in Indigenous Capability Development
Dimension Description Strategic Impact
Industrial base Fragmented, lacks full-spectrum development No self-reliance in core systems
R&D investment Minimal funding, weak frameworks Falls behind in emerging technologies
Foreign dependency Imports all major platforms and weapons Vulnerable to external shocks
Policy execution Strong on paper, weak in practice Stalled programs and missed timelines
ð§ Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh cannot scale or sustain its military without foreign support.
• It lacks the ability to customize systems to local needs, export defense products, or build strategic depth.
• In contrast, countries like Indonesia (Pindad, PT PAL), Vietnam (Z111 Factory), and Singapore (ST Engineering) have made significant strides in indigenous capability
ð 1. Ambitious Policy Documents with Limited Follow-Through
Hapus• Malondesh’s first Defence White Paper (DWP), launched in 2019, laid out a 10-year roadmap for force modernization, defense industry reform, and multi-domain readiness.
• It proposed initiatives like:
o A revised National Military Strategy
o A Defence Capacity Plan
o A National Defence Industry Policy
• However, by 2021–2025, many of these remained in draft form or unimplemented, with only partial progress on cyber and air surveillance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic clarity exists, but execution lags, creating a credibility gap between policy and reality.
ð°️ 2. Stalled Programs and Missed Timelines
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program is the most glaring example:
o RM9 billion allocated for six ships
o None delivered as of 2025
o Delays linked to mismanagement, redacted audits, and political interference
• Other programs like the Ground-Based Air Defence (GBAD) system and High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV) remain unfunded or stuck in approval stages.
Impact: Operational capability suffers, and the military continues to rely on aging platforms.
ð️ 3. Political Instability and Policy Discontinuity
• Malondesh experienced multiple changes in government between 2020 and 2022, disrupting defense planning cycles.
• Each administration brought new priorities, causing re-scoping, delays, or abandonment of existing programs.
• Even when policies are reaffirmed, bureaucratic inertia and fragmented oversight slow implementation.
Impact: Defense reform lacks continuity, and long-term planning is undermined.
ð§ą 4. Weak Institutional Mechanisms for Execution
• There’s no centralized authority to monitor and enforce defense policy implementation.
• Oversight is split between MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and political leadership, leading to diffused accountability.
• Audit findings are often delayed or redacted, and recommendations go unenforced.
Impact: Programs stall without consequence, and systemic inefficiencies persist.
ð Summary Table: Why Policy Execution Is Weak
Problem Area Description Strategic Impact
Overambitious planning Policies exceed institutional capacity Unrealistic timelines, stalled delivery
Political volatility Frequent leadership changes disrupt continuity Re-scoping and abandonment of programs
Fragmented oversight No unified implementation body Poor accountability and follow-through
Audit suppression Delayed or redacted findings Mismanagement goes unchecked
ð§ Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh’s defense posture remains reactive and maintenance-heavy, not transformation-driven.
• The credibility of future policy documents is weakened unless backed by institutional reform and budget discipline.
• Regional peers like Indonesia and Vietnam are executing modernization plans more consistently, widening the capability gap.
Hanya mampu GELAK..... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusEkonom Prediksi Kerugian Ekonomi Akibat Demo Sentuh Rp9 Triliun
https://www.bola.net/news/ekonom-prediksi-kerugian-ekonomi-akibat-demo-sentuh-rp9-triliun-4a9f74.html
ð§ 1. MAINTENANCE BURDEN: AGING ASSETS, FRAGMENTED SUPPORT
Hapus⚙️ Structural Drivers
• Asset Age: As of late 2024, 171 military platforms across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service life. This includes:
o 108 Army vehicles and artillery systems
o 29 RMAF aircraft (e.g., F-5E, Hawk 208)
o 34 RMN vessels, including Fast Attack Craft over 40 years old
• Obsolescence: Many platforms are no longer supported by OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), making spare parts scarce and costly.
ðļ Economic Strain
• Maintenance consumes over 50% of the defense budget’s operational expenditure (OPEX), leaving limited room for modernization.
• Even with recent efforts to localize MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul) for fighter jets like the F/A-18, cost savings (~20%) are offset by the scale of aging fleets.
ð§Đ Outsourcing Challenges
• Malaysia has long outsourced support functions to private firms to reduce costs.
• However, lack of centralized oversight, inconsistent quality control, and limited technical depth in local vendors have led to delays and suboptimal readiness.
ðĄ 2. Poor Interoperability: Platform Diversity, Command Silos
ð ️ Platform Fragmentation
• Malaysia’s military operates a highly diverse inventory sourced from:
o Western suppliers (US, UK, France)
o Eastern bloc (Russia, China)
o Regional partners (South Korea, Turkey)
• This results in incompatible communication systems, data links, and logistics chains. For example:
o Russian-made Su-30MKM fighters cannot seamlessly integrate with NATO-standard AWACS or datalink systems.
o Naval platforms lack unified combat management systems across classes.
ð§ Command & Control Gaps
• Joint operations are hindered by service-specific doctrines and siloed command structures.
• The absence of a Joint Operations Command with real-time data fusion limits Malaysia’s ability to conduct multi-domain operations.
𧊠Training & Simulation Deficiencies
• Lack of integrated simulation environments means personnel are trained on platform-specific systems, not joint mission profiles.
• Exercises like MALBATT and CARAT show progress, but interoperability remains tactical, not strategic.
ð Summary Table: Maintenance vs. Interoperability Weaknesses
Dimension Maintenance Burden Poor Interoperability
Root Cause Aging assets, fragmented procurement Diverse suppliers, siloed doctrines
Budgetary Impact High OPEX, low modernization headroom Redundant systems, inefficient upgrades
Operational Impact Low readiness, frequent downtime Limited joint ops, weak situational awareness
Reform Challenges Weak vendor oversight, slow MRO localization No unified C4ISR architecture
ð° 1. Budget Composition Skewed Toward Salaries and Maintenance
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o RM8.2 billion (~41.5%) went to salaries and allowances.
o RM5.8 billion was earmarked for maintenance and asset upkeep.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, and infrastructure.
Impact: The lion’s share of the budget sustains personnel and legacy systems, leaving little for new combat capabilities.
ðĶ 2. Procurement Budget Includes Legacy Payments
• The RM5.71 billion procurement allocation in 2024 isn’t entirely for new systems. It includes:
o Scheduled payments for previously signed contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets from South Korea, A400M upgrades).
o Progressive payments for delayed projects like the Maharaja Lela-class Littoral Combat Ships.
o Small-scale purchases (e.g. small arms, radios, support vehicles).
Impact: The actual discretionary funding for new combat platforms is far lower than it appears on paper.
ð 3. Currency Depreciation Erodes Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources most of its advanced systems from foreign OEMs (e.g. France, UK, South Korea).
• The depreciation of the ringgit against major currencies means that even modest increases in nominal budget do not translate into real gains.
Impact: Malondesh pays more for the same equipment, reducing the volume and quality of new acquisitions.
ð§ą 4. No Multi-Year Strategic Investment Framework
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, Malondesh lacks a ring-fenced capital investment stream for defense.
• Each year’s procurement is subject to political negotiation and fiscal trade-offs, with no guaranteed continuity.
• This discourages long-term programs like missile development, drone fleets, or integrated air defense systems.
Impact: Strategic programs are fragmented, delayed, or abandoned mid-cycle.
ð Summary Table: Why Funding for New Combat Systems Is Thin
Factor Description Strategic Impact
Budget skew 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance Minimal room for new acquisitions
Legacy obligations Procurement includes old contracts and delayed projects New systems get crowded out
Currency depreciation Ringgit weakens against USD/EUR Reduces real purchasing power
No strategic investment model No multi-year capital planning Limits continuity and ambition
ðļ 1. Budget Breakdown: Overweight on Operational Costs
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o Salaries and allowances alone accounted for RM8.2 billion (~41.5%).
o Maintenance and asset upkeep received RM5.8 billion in 2025.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, infrastructure, and strategic programs.
Impact: The budget is heavily skewed toward sustaining the current force rather than building future capabilities.
ð§ą 2. Procurement Funding Is Thin and Fragmented
• The RM5.71 billion allocated for procurement in 2024 includes:
o Scheduled payments for existing contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets, A400M upgrades, LCS ships)
o Small-scale purchases like communication gear, vehicles, and small arms
• Due to ringgit depreciation and reliance on foreign suppliers, real purchasing power is eroded.
Impact: Malondesh struggles to fund new combat systems, let alone strategic platforms like missiles, drones, or ISR networks.
𧰠3. Maintenance of Aging Assets Is Costly and Inefficient
• Much of the RM5.8 billion maintenance budget goes to keeping legacy platforms operational, some over 30–40 years old.
• Example: The Navy’s Condor APCs and older patrol vessels require frequent repairs, yet offer limited tactical value.
Impact: High sunk costs in outdated systems reduce the ability to invest in transformative technologies.
ð§ 4. No Dedicated Strategic Investment Stream
• Malondesh lacks a multi-year capital investment framework for defense.
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, there’s no ring-fenced funding for:
o Missile development
o Cyber warfare
o Space-based surveillance
o Indigenous defense R&D
Impact: Strategic programs are ad hoc, underfunded, and vulnerable to political shifts.
ð Summary Table: How Budget Crowds Out Combat Capability
Category Allocation (2024–2025) Strategic Impact
Salaries & Allowances RM8.2B (~41.5%) Limits flexibility for modernization
Maintenance & Upkeep RM5.8B Sustains aging platforms, not upgrades
Procurement (net new) RM5.71B (incl. legacy contracts) Thin funding for new combat systems
R&D / Strategic Programs Negligible No indigenous capability development
Malu maluin berita kayak gitu..itu hoat di Indonesia utk pancing ikan..seriusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
HapusMakin parah....... HANCUR
BalasHapusUPDATE Masjid Al Jabbar Tegalsari Surabaya Ludes Dibakar Massa
https://mataraman.tribunnews.com/news/60330/update-masjid-al-jabbar-tegalsari-surabaya-ludes-dibakar-massa
ð§ 1. MAINTENANCE BURDEN: AGING ASSETS, FRAGMENTED SUPPORT
Hapus⚙️ Structural Drivers
• Asset Age: As of late 2024, 171 military platforms across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service life. This includes:
o 108 Army vehicles and artillery systems
o 29 RMAF aircraft (e.g., F-5E, Hawk 208)
o 34 RMN vessels, including Fast Attack Craft over 40 years old
• Obsolescence: Many platforms are no longer supported by OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), making spare parts scarce and costly.
ðļ Economic Strain
• Maintenance consumes over 50% of the defense budget’s operational expenditure (OPEX), leaving limited room for modernization.
• Even with recent efforts to localize MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul) for fighter jets like the F/A-18, cost savings (~20%) are offset by the scale of aging fleets.
ð§Đ Outsourcing Challenges
• Malaysia has long outsourced support functions to private firms to reduce costs.
• However, lack of centralized oversight, inconsistent quality control, and limited technical depth in local vendors have led to delays and suboptimal readiness.
ðĄ 2. Poor Interoperability: Platform Diversity, Command Silos
ð ️ Platform Fragmentation
• Malaysia’s military operates a highly diverse inventory sourced from:
o Western suppliers (US, UK, France)
o Eastern bloc (Russia, China)
o Regional partners (South Korea, Turkey)
• This results in incompatible communication systems, data links, and logistics chains. For example:
o Russian-made Su-30MKM fighters cannot seamlessly integrate with NATO-standard AWACS or datalink systems.
o Naval platforms lack unified combat management systems across classes.
ð§ Command & Control Gaps
• Joint operations are hindered by service-specific doctrines and siloed command structures.
• The absence of a Joint Operations Command with real-time data fusion limits Malaysia’s ability to conduct multi-domain operations.
𧊠Training & Simulation Deficiencies
• Lack of integrated simulation environments means personnel are trained on platform-specific systems, not joint mission profiles.
• Exercises like MALBATT and CARAT show progress, but interoperability remains tactical, not strategic.
ð Summary Table: Maintenance vs. Interoperability Weaknesses
Dimension Maintenance Burden Poor Interoperability
Root Cause Aging assets, fragmented procurement Diverse suppliers, siloed doctrines
Budgetary Impact High OPEX, low modernization headroom Redundant systems, inefficient upgrades
Operational Impact Low readiness, frequent downtime Limited joint ops, weak situational awareness
Reform Challenges Weak vendor oversight, slow MRO localization No unified C4ISR architecture
ð° 1. Budget Composition: Operational vs Development
Hapus• In 2025, Malondesh allocated RM21.2 billion to the Ministry of Defence.
o Operational Expenditure (OPEX): RM13.36 billion (~63%) — covers salaries, pensions, allowances, and day-to-day operations.
o Development Expenditure (DE): RM7.49 billion (~37%) — intended for asset acquisition, infrastructure, and modernization.
Impact: The bulk of funding goes to sustaining the status quo, not building future capabilities.
ðĨ 2. Personnel Costs Dominate Spending
• Salaries, pensions, and welfare programs for active-duty personnel and veterans consume over half of OPEX.
• Initiatives like RKAT housing repairs, pension adjustments, and cost-of-living allowances are important for morale but crowd out capital investment.
• Malondesh armed forces have a relatively large administrative footprint compared to its combat strength.
Impact: High fixed costs reduce flexibility for strategic procurement or force restructuring.
ð§ 3. Maintenance Over Modernization
• RM5.8 billion in 2025 was earmarked for maintenance, repair, and acquisition of military assets.
• However, most of this goes to keeping aging platforms operational, not acquiring new ones.
• Example: The Royal Malondeshn Navy spends heavily on maintaining ships that are 30–40 years old, with minimal upgrades.
Impact: Funds are spent on patching legacy systems rather than leapfrogging to modern technologies.
ð 4. Low R&D and Capability Investment
• Malondesh allocates negligible funding to defense R&D, indigenous production, or strategic systems (e.g. missiles, cyber, ISR).
• Unlike peers such as Indonesia or Vietnam, Malondesh has no major co-development programs or defense industrial offsets.
Impact: Malondesh remains dependent on foreign suppliers and lacks autonomy in capability planning.
ð Summary Table: Budget Allocation Weaknesses
Category Description Strategic Impact
Operational Expenditure RM13.36B for salaries, pensions, and operations Limits modernization and flexibility
Personnel Costs High welfare and admin spending Crowds out combat capability investment
Maintenance Focus RM5.8B for upkeep of aging assets Sustains outdated platforms
Low R&D Investment Minimal funding for innovation or strategic systems No indigenous capability development
ðŦ 1. No Long-Range Strike Systems
Hapus• Malondesh does not possess ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, or standoff precision-guided munitions.
• Its air force lacks platforms capable of launching deep-strike missions. The Su-30MKM fighters have range and payload potential, but Malondesh has not equipped them with long-range strike munitions like Kh-59 or BrahMos.
• Naval assets are similarly limited—no ship-launched cruise missiles or land-attack capabilities exist.
Impact: Malondesh cannot credibly threaten retaliation against adversaries beyond its borders, reducing its strategic leverage.
ðĄ️ 2. Deterrence by Denial, Not Punishment
• Malondesh defense doctrine emphasizes “concentric deterrence”, focusing on denial rather than punishment.
• This means the strategy is built around preventing aggression, not retaliating against it.
• While this suits peacetime stability, it’s increasingly inadequate in a region where China, Vietnam, and the Philippines are investing in deterrence-by-punishment capabilities.
Impact: Malondesh lacks escalation control and cannot impose costs on adversaries, weakening its deterrent posture.
ðļ 3. Budget Priorities Undermine Capability Development
• Over 60–70% of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations.
• This leaves minimal room for R&D, procurement of advanced weapons, or strategic force development.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal and delays have further eroded trust and diverted resources from strategic programs.
Impact: Malondesh is stuck in a cycle of maintaining legacy systems rather than investing in future capabilities.
ð 4. No Indigenous Missile or Strategic Weapons Program
• Unlike regional peers such as Indonesia (which is co-developing missiles with Turkey) or Vietnam (which fields Russian cruise missiles), Malondesh has no domestic missile development program.
• It also lacks partnerships for co-production or licensed manufacturing of strategic weapons.
Impact: Total dependence on foreign suppliers; no autonomy in strategic force planning.
ð Summary Table: Strategic Strike & Deterrence Weaknesses
Weakness Description Strategic Impact
No long-range strike systems No cruise, ballistic, or standoff weapons Cannot retaliate or shape adversary behavior
Denial-based doctrine Focus on defense, not punishment Weak deterrence posture
Budget constraints Most funds go to salaries and maintenance No room for strategic force development
No indigenous capability No missile R&D or co-production High dependency, low autonomy
Berita apa ini woooiiii..! Boat kcil..utk pancing ikan klu di Indonesia..ompong pula..ððð malu maluin AseanðĪðĪðĪ
HapusMAKIN PARAH ..... HANCUR
BalasHapusUTANG MALON SUDAH BERGUNUNG2
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
ð§ 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped MRO Infrastructure
BalasHapus• Malondesh defense MRO sector is technically shallow, with most local firms focused on commercial aviation, not military-grade systems.
• Despite having over 200 aerospace companies, only a handful are equipped to handle complex military platforms like fighter jets, naval combat systems, or armored vehicles.
• The defense MRO ecosystem lacks dedicated facilities for:
o Engine overhauls (especially for Su-30MKM and Hawk aircraft)
o Combat system integration
o Naval propulsion and sensor maintenance
Impact: Military platforms face long downtimes and must rely on foreign OEMs for critical servicing.
ð§ą 2. Slow Localization and Limited Technical Depth
• Malondesh has made partial progress in localizing MRO for platforms like the F/A-18D Hornet, but most high-end servicing still requires foreign technical assistance.
• There is no national MRO roadmap aligned with defense modernization goals, unlike countries like Turkey or South Korea that have built robust domestic ecosystems through tech transfer and industrial offsets.
• Local firms lack access to classified schematics, proprietary software, and advanced diagnostic tools needed for full-spectrum support.
Impact: Strategic dependence persists, and Malondesh cannot sustain its fleet autonomously during crises or embargoes.
ðĩ️ 3. Weak Vendor Oversight and Governance
• The 2025 Auditor-General’s Report flagged major lapses in vendor management:
o RM162.75 million in late penalties were not collected
o RM1.42 million in fines were never imposed for delayed maintenance
• Contracts are often awarded to politically connected firms without rigorous performance benchmarks or technical vetting.
• Oversight is fragmented across MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and service branches, leading to diffused accountability.
Impact: Maintenance quality is inconsistent, costs are inflated, and readiness suffers.
ð 4. Obsolete Platforms and Spare Part Bottlenecks
• Malondesh inventory includes 171 platforms over 30 years old, many of which require parts that are:
o No longer manufactured
o Sourced from defunct suppliers
o Incompatible with newer systems
• RM384.5 million was lost due to 1.62 million unused spare parts that no longer matched operational needs.
Impact: Maintenance becomes reactive and inefficient, with high sunk costs and low operational returns.
ð Summary Table: MRO Asset Weaknesses in Malondeshn Military
Weakness Area Description Strategic Impact
Infrastructure gaps Few facilities for military-grade MRO Long downtimes, foreign dependency
Slow localization Limited tech transfer, no unified roadmap No autonomy in fleet sustainment
Vendor oversight Poor contract enforcement, inflated costs Inconsistent quality, low accountability
Spare part obsolescence Aging platforms, mismatched inventory Budget waste, reduced readiness
ð§ Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh ability to sustain combat operations over time is compromised.
• Without robust MRO capabilities, even newly acquired platforms (e.g. FA-50 jets, LCS ships) risk becoming high-cost liabilities.
• Regional peers like Indonesia and Singapore are investing in integrated MRO hubs, giving them a long-term readiness advantage.
NGERI UTANG MALON SANGAT MENGGUNUNG ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusSetiap penduduk MALON mempunyai UTANG rata2 RM 47.000
Setiap penduduk MALON dibebani UTANG KERAJAAN sekitar RM 37.000
NGERI ...
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Pada akhir kuartal pertama 2025 (Maret 2025), total utang rumah tangga Malaysia adalah RM 1,65 triliun atau setara 84,3% dari PDB, sedangkan utang pemerintah persekutuan mencapai RM 1,3 triliun pada akhir Juni 2025, naik dari RM 1,25 triliun pada akhir 2024. Utang pemerintah terhadap PDB diperkirakan akan mencapai 69% pada akhir 2025.
MAKIN PARAH UTANG MALON GUYS
HapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
MAKIN PARAH UTANG MALON GUYS
HapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
HANYA MAMPU GELAK ....... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusTERNYATA UTANG PER PENDUDUK MALON CAPAI RM 47.000
KEHANCURAN DARI DALAM MAKIN PARAH... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusBUBAR 2030 MAKIN NYATA... ððŧððŧðĪĢðĪĢ
Iya MALON BUBAR 2030 AKIBAT UTANG MENGGUNUNG
Hapusð 1. Accelerated Modernization by Neighbors
Hapus• Singapore maintains one of the most technologically advanced militaries in Southeast Asia, with investments in F-15SG fighters, submarines, and integrated air defense systems.
• Indonesia has ramped up procurement of Rafale jets, frigates, and drones, aiming for a more balanced tri-service force.
• Vietnam has focused on asymmetric capabilities, acquiring Kilo-class submarines, coastal missile systems, and modernizing its air defense.
• Philippines is deepening defense ties with the US, Japan, and Australia, acquiring BrahMos missiles and upgrading its naval fleet.
Result: Malondesh risks falling behind in both conventional and hybrid warfare capabilities2.
ð 2. Malondesh Budget Bottleneck
• Malondesh defense budget has stagnated at RM15–18 billion annually, with 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance, leaving little for modernization.
• Major projects like the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program have been plagued by delays and scandals, further eroding trust and capability.
Result: While neighbors invest in future-ready systems, Malondesh struggles to maintain legacy platforms.
ð 3. Strategic Exposure in the South China Sea
• China’s coast guard and maritime militia have repeatedly entered Malondesh Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), testing its maritime sovereignty.
• Malondesh aging naval fleet—28 of 34 vessels are over 40 years old—limits its ability to respond effectively.
Result: Malondesh deterrence posture is weakened, especially in contested maritime zones.
ð§ 4. Diplomatic vs. Hard Power Approach
• Malondesh has traditionally relied on quiet diplomacy and ASEAN mechanisms to manage regional tensions.
• However, the geopolitical landscape is shifting toward hard power signaling, with countries like the Philippines and Vietnam adopting more assertive defense postures.
Result: Malondesh soft approach is increasingly outpaced by neighbors who combine diplomacy with credible military strength.
ð Summary Table: Malondesh vs. Regional Peers
Country Modernization Focus Strategic Advantage Over Malondesh
Singapore High-tech platforms, integrated C4ISR Superior air/naval integration
Indonesia Balanced tri-service upgrades Larger force, expanding reach
Vietnam Asymmetric coastal defense Strong deterrence in South China Sea
Philippines Allied-backed modernization Rapid capability growth, joint exercises
Malondesh Aging inventory, budget constraints Limited deterrence, slow procurement
Ada Malondesh TANTRUM KEPANASAN sambil Loncat Loncat kesana kemari karena Tidak Terima Rakyat INDONESIA melakukan Demonstrasi sebagai wujud Perjuangan Rakyat....
BalasHapusNetizen Indonesia tertawa terbahak-bahak dong
WKWKWKWK
Gedung DPRD dan Kantor Wali Kota Pekalongan Dibakar Massa saat Demo
BalasHapushttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HTgZvksUREg&pp=ygVDR2VkdW5nIERQUkQgZGFuIEthbnRvciBXYWxpIEtvdGEgUGVrYWxvbmdhbiBEaWJha2FyIE1hc3NhIHNhYXQgRGVtbw%3D%3D
1. Entrenched Role of Middlemen
Hapus• Defense contracts are frequently brokered by agents or intermediaries, many of whom are retired military officers or politically connected individuals.
• These middlemen often act as gatekeepers between the Ministry of Defence and foreign suppliers, adding layers of cost and complexity.
• According to analysts, this system is deeply entrenched and has become an “open secret” in Malondesh defense ecosystem.
Impact: Prices are inflated, procurement timelines are extended, and transparency is compromised.
ð§ą 2. Opaque Tendering and Limited Competition
• Fewer than one-third of major defense contracts are awarded through open competition.
• Most deals are conducted via single-source or limited tenders, which favor firms with insider access or political leverage.
• This environment allows deal structuring to be influenced by non-technical considerations, including patronage and lobbying.
Impact: Merit-based selection is sidelined, and cost-effectiveness suffers.
ð️ 3. Politically Connected Firms Dominate
• Many defense contractors have ex-military figures on their boards, giving them privileged access to decision-makers.
• These firms often win contracts despite offering older platforms or substandard equipment—as seen in the attempted purchase of 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which Malondesh King publicly condemned as “flying coffins”2.
• The King also rebuked “agents” and “salesmen” in the Ministry of Defence, warning that inflated middleman pricing would render the defense budget perpetually insufficient.
Impact: Public funds are wasted, and the armed forces receive outdated or unsuitable equipment.
ð 4. Consequences for Readiness and Reform
• Inflated costs mean fewer assets can be acquired, and maintenance budgets are squeezed.
• The lack of transparency erodes public trust and makes it difficult for oversight bodies like the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to hold officials accountable.
• While the King’s intervention led to the cancellation of the Black Hawk deal, systemic reform remains elusive.
ð Summary Table: How Middlemen & Opaque Deals Inflate Costs
Mechanism Description Consequence
Middlemen Agents with insider access broker deals Inflated prices, longer timelines
Limited tendering Few contracts awarded via open competition Reduced transparency, poor value
Politically connected firms Ex-military or political figures dominate contractor space Patronage, outdated equipment
Lack of oversight Weak enforcement and redacted audits Mismanagement persists
ð§ 1. Aging Components Beyond Service Life
Hapus• As of 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service2.
• Many platforms—like the Royal Malondeshn Navy’s Fast Attack Craft (FAC)—are over 40 years old, with some approaching 50 years.
• These assets were designed for past-era threats and technologies, and their mechanical systems are now prone to fatigue, corrosion, and failure.
Result: Even routine operations carry elevated risk of malfunction, requiring constant patchwork maintenance.
ðī 2. Tropical Climate Accelerates Wear
• Malondesh’s hot, humid, and saline environment is particularly harsh on military hardware:
o Metal fatigue and corrosion are accelerated, especially in naval vessels and aircraft.
o Rubber seals, electronics, and hydraulics degrade faster under tropical heat and moisture.
• The Navy has acknowledged that many vessels no longer meet modern standards due to environmental degradation.
Result: Maintenance cycles shorten, costs rise, and reliability drops.
ð§ 3. Obsolete Systems and Spare Parts Shortage
• Many legacy platforms rely on foreign OEMs that have ceased production or support.
• Spare parts must be sourced internationally, often at inflated prices and long lead times.
• In some cases, technicians resort to cannibalizing other units or fabricating parts locally—neither of which guarantees reliability.
Result: Delays in repairs, reduced fleet availability, and compromised safety.
⚠️ 4. Operational Incidents and Safety Risks
• A tragic example: In July 2025, a Malondeshn commando died during a maritime exercise due to suspected failure of aging diving equipment.
• The Army Chief confirmed that the gear was “rather old,” prompting a full audit of equipment lifecycle and maintenance protocols.
Result: Legacy systems not only reduce readiness—they pose direct risks to personnel.
ð Summary Table: Breakdown Drivers in Malondeshn Military
Factor Description Operational Impact
Aging components Platforms >30–50 years old, beyond design limits Frequent failures, low reliability
Tropical wear Heat, humidity, salt accelerate degradation Shorter maintenance cycles
Obsolete systems Legacy tech, no OEM support Spare part shortages, delays
Safety incidents Equipment failures linked to fatal accidents Personnel risk, public scrutiny
UTANG SEMAKIN MENGGUNUNG GUYS ..... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusMALON BUBAR SEMAKIN NYATA .....ððð
UTANGMU SISA BERAPA PUR?
BalasHapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Malondesh itu Dijajah oleh BRITISH selama 999 tahun, right?
BalasHapusArtinya:
Malondesh itu TIDAK TAHU apa itu Arti Perjuangan Rakyat Indonesia.....
Netizen Indonesia tertawa terbahak-bahak dong
WKWKWKWK
MALON TIDAK TAU APA2 OM
HapusTAUNYA NGUTANG DAN MEMBUAL
SEJAK LAHIR BAYI MALON DIBEBANI UTANG RM 84.000
BalasHapusKASIHAN ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusEkonom Soal Utang Negara: Tiap WNI Tanggung Beban Rp30,5 Juta
https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/31461/ekonom-soal-utang-negara-tiap-wni-tanggung-beban-rp30-5-juta
ðŦ 1. Limited Missile Inventory and Range
Hapus• The Malondeshn Army currently fields only short-range air defense systems, notably the Starstreak and aging Rapier missiles.
• These systems are effective only within 5–7 km, offering minimal protection against modern aircraft, drones, or cruise missiles.
• Malondesh lacks medium- and long-range surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), leaving critical infrastructure and forward bases vulnerable.
Impact: Inability to defend against high-altitude or standoff threats; poor layered defense architecture.
ð ️ 2. Delayed Modernization and Funding Gaps
• Although Malondesh has published requirements for new Ground-Based Air Defence (GBAD) systems, no funding has been allocated.
• Proposed systems like MBDA’s MICA VL NG and EMADS (CAMM) offer 40+ km range and advanced seekers, but remain unprocured.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program includes VL MICA missiles, but the ships themselves are years behind schedule, delaying missile deployment.
Impact: Strategic plans remain theoretical; operational readiness is compromised by procurement delays.
ð 3. Fragmented Missile Ecosystem
• Malondesh missile systems are sourced from multiple foreign suppliers (UK, France, Russia), resulting in:
o Interoperability issues
o Complex logistics and maintenance
o Training burdens across platforms
• No indigenous missile production capability exists, and local defense industry lacks integration with global supply chains.
Impact: High dependency on foreign vendors; low sustainability in prolonged conflict scenarios.
ð 4. No Strategic Strike or Deterrent Capability
• Malondesh does not possess ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, or standoff precision-guided munitions.
• This absence limits its ability to:
o Strike high-value targets beyond its borders
o Deter adversaries with credible retaliation
o Support joint operations with regional partners
Impact: Malondesh remains a defensive-only actor, unable to shape regional dynamics or respond asymmetrically.
ð Summary Table: Missile Capability Weaknesses
Weakness Description Strategic Impact
Short-range inventory Only Starstreak and Rapier systems in service Vulnerable to modern air threats
Procurement delays No funding for new GBAD systems; LCS delays Reduced readiness and deterrence
Fragmented ecosystem Multiple suppliers, no local production Poor interoperability and sustainment
No strike capability No cruise or ballistic missiles Limited strategic options and deterrence
ð§ 1. Scale of the Aging Inventory
Hapus• As of late 2024, 171 military assets across all three branches of the Malondeshn Armed Forces (ATM) have exceeded 30 years of service:
o Army: 108 units
o Air Force (RMAF): 29 units
o Navy (RMN): 34 vessels
• Many of these platforms—like the Fast Attack Craft (FAC) in the Navy—are over 40 years old, with some approaching half a century in service2.
Implication: These assets suffer from outdated systems, reduced operational capability, and high maintenance costs, making them increasingly unfit for modern warfare.
ð 2. No Structured Replacement Plan
• Malondesh lacks a multi-year force modernization roadmap. Instead, procurement is often ad hoc, reactive, and politically driven.
• The budgeting process does not clearly indicate what assets will be replaced, when, or how funding will be allocated over time.
• For example, the Army is still waiting for approval to replace its aging Condor APC fleet with 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV), despite urgent operational needs.
Implication: Without a structured plan, aging platforms remain in service far beyond their intended lifespan, and capability gaps widen.
ð 3. Maintenance Burden and Capability Decay
• Older assets require frequent repairs, often with obsolete parts or foreign OEM support, which drives up costs and delays readiness.
• Technological obsolescence means these platforms cannot integrate with newer systems or meet interoperability standards with allies.
Example: The RMN’s older vessels no longer meet modern naval standards in terms of sensors, weapons, or endurance2.
ð§ 4. Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh’s ability to project force, defend its maritime zones, and respond to regional threats is diminished.
• Neighboring countries like Indonesia, Vietnam, and Singapore have clear modernization trajectories, leaving Malondesh at risk of falling behind in regional deterrence.
ð Summary Table: Aging Inventory vs. Lack of Replacement Strategy
Problem Area Description Strategic Impact
Aging platforms 171 assets >30 years old across Army, Navy, Air Force Reduced combat effectiveness
No replacement roadmap No long-term plan for phased recapitalization Procurement delays, capability gaps
High maintenance costs Obsolete systems, foreign parts, frequent breakdowns Budget strain, low readiness
Regional disadvantage Neighbors modernizing faster Loss of deterrence, strategic lag
Sudah MISKIN KUAT NGUTANG lagi... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusNyesek! Bayi Baru Lahir di Indonesia Langsung Punya Utang Rp32 Juta, Belanja Popok Kena Pajak
https://www.suara.com/news/2025/08/23/164230/nyesek-bayi-baru-lahir-di-indonesia-langsung-punya-utang-rp32-juta-belanja-popok-kena-pajak
ð§ 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped MRO Infrastructure
Hapus• Malondesh defense MRO sector is technically shallow, with most local firms focused on commercial aviation, not military-grade systems.
• Despite having over 200 aerospace companies, only a handful are equipped to handle complex military platforms like fighter jets, naval combat systems, or armored vehicles.
• The defense MRO ecosystem lacks dedicated facilities for:
o Engine overhauls (especially for Su-30MKM and Hawk aircraft)
o Combat system integration
o Naval propulsion and sensor maintenance
Impact: Military platforms face long downtimes and must rely on foreign OEMs for critical servicing.
ð§ą 2. Slow Localization and Limited Technical Depth
• Malondesh has made partial progress in localizing MRO for platforms like the F/A-18D Hornet, but most high-end servicing still requires foreign technical assistance.
• There is no national MRO roadmap aligned with defense modernization goals, unlike countries like Turkey or South Korea that have built robust domestic ecosystems through tech transfer and industrial offsets.
• Local firms lack access to classified schematics, proprietary software, and advanced diagnostic tools needed for full-spectrum support.
Impact: Strategic dependence persists, and Malondesh cannot sustain its fleet autonomously during crises or embargoes.
ðĩ️ 3. Weak Vendor Oversight and Governance
• The 2025 Auditor-General’s Report flagged major lapses in vendor management:
o RM162.75 million in late penalties were not collected
o RM1.42 million in fines were never imposed for delayed maintenance
• Contracts are often awarded to politically connected firms without rigorous performance benchmarks or technical vetting.
• Oversight is fragmented across MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and service branches, leading to diffused accountability.
Impact: Maintenance quality is inconsistent, costs are inflated, and readiness suffers.
ð 4. Obsolete Platforms and Spare Part Bottlenecks
• Malondesh inventory includes 171 platforms over 30 years old, many of which require parts that are:
o No longer manufactured
o Sourced from defunct suppliers
o Incompatible with newer systems
• RM384.5 million was lost due to 1.62 million unused spare parts that no longer matched operational needs.
Impact: Maintenance becomes reactive and inefficient, with high sunk costs and low operational returns.
ð Summary Table: MRO Asset Weaknesses in Malondeshn Military
Weakness Area Description Strategic Impact
Infrastructure gaps Few facilities for military-grade MRO Long downtimes, foreign dependency
Slow localization Limited tech transfer, no unified roadmap No autonomy in fleet sustainment
Vendor oversight Poor contract enforcement, inflated costs Inconsistent quality, low accountability
Spare part obsolescence Aging platforms, mismatched inventory Budget waste, reduced readiness
ð§ Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh ability to sustain combat operations over time is compromised.
• Without robust MRO capabilities, even newly acquired platforms (e.g. FA-50 jets, LCS ships) risk becoming high-cost liabilities.
• Regional peers like Indonesia and Singapore are investing in integrated MRO hubs, giving them a long-term readiness advantage.
ð° 1. Chronic Budget Constraints
Hapus• Malondesh defense budget has remained stagnant or modest relative to its strategic needs. Successive governments have been unwilling to reallocate funds from other sectors or reduce manpower to prioritize modernization.
• For example, the Army is still awaiting Finance Ministry approval for the procurement of 136 High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV), despite urgent operational requirements.
Result: Procurement plans are delayed or scaled down, leaving aging platforms in service well past their intended lifespan.
ð§ą 2. Procurement Mismanagement & Delays
• The Auditor-General’s 2025 report flagged RM7.8 billion in armoured vehicle contracts plagued by:
o Delayed deliveries (e.g., 68 GEMPITA units delivered late)
o Full payments made despite contract breaches
o Weak enforcement of penalties (RM162.75 million fine claimed two years late)3
• Maintenance and spare parts for key assets like ADNAN and PENDEKAR were also delayed, with fines left uncollected.
Result: Even when acquisitions are approved, execution is inefficient and accountability is weak.
ðī️ 3. Middlemen & Non-Transparent Deal Structures
• Defense procurement is often conducted via limited tenders or single-source contracts, with fewer than one-third awarded through open competition.
• Politically connected firms—often led by retired military officers—dominate the landscape, inflating costs and reducing transparency.
• The King of Malondesh recently rebuked the Defence Ministry for relying on “agents” and “salesmen,” calling out inflated prices and the attempted purchase of 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which he likened to “flying coffins”.
Result: Corruption risks and inflated pricing erode trust and reduce the effectiveness of spending.
ð§ 4. Aging Inventory & No Replacement Strategy
• As of late 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Air Force, and Navy were over 30 years old.
• Yet, there is no clear roadmap for phased replacement or recapitalization, and ad hoc purchases continue to dominate.
Result: Operational readiness suffers, and Malondesh risks capability gaps in key domains like air defense, maritime patrol, and armored mobility.
ð Summary Table: Why Malondesh Struggles to Acquire Military Assets
Factor Description Impact
Budget limitations Low prioritization of defense in national spending Delayed or cancelled acquisitions
Procurement mismanagement Poor contract enforcement, late deliveries Waste of funds, reduced readiness
Middlemen & opaque deals Politically connected firms inflate costs Corruption risk, poor value
Aging inventory No structured replacement plan Capability gaps, low deterrence
SEJAK LAHIR BAYI MALON DIBEBANI UTANG RM 84.000
BalasHapusKASIHAN ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
PEMERINTAH nya kuat NGUTANG... Rakyat yang DI PERAS... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusUtang Membengkak, Rakyat Dibebani Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan
https://beritaborneo.com/main/utang-membengkak-rakyat-dibebani-pajak-bumi-dan-bangunan/
ðŦ 1. No Long-Range Strike Systems
Hapus• Malondesh does not possess ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, or standoff precision-guided munitions.
• Its air force lacks platforms capable of launching deep-strike missions. The Su-30MKM fighters have range and payload potential, but Malondesh has not equipped them with long-range strike munitions like Kh-59 or BrahMos.
• Naval assets are similarly limited—no ship-launched cruise missiles or land-attack capabilities exist.
Impact: Malondesh cannot credibly threaten retaliation against adversaries beyond its borders, reducing its strategic leverage.
ðĄ️ 2. Deterrence by Denial, Not Punishment
• Malondesh defense doctrine emphasizes “concentric deterrence”, focusing on denial rather than punishment.
• This means the strategy is built around preventing aggression, not retaliating against it.
• While this suits peacetime stability, it’s increasingly inadequate in a region where China, Vietnam, and the Philippines are investing in deterrence-by-punishment capabilities.
Impact: Malondesh lacks escalation control and cannot impose costs on adversaries, weakening its deterrent posture.
ðļ 3. Budget Priorities Undermine Capability Development
• Over 60–70% of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations.
• This leaves minimal room for R&D, procurement of advanced weapons, or strategic force development.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal and delays have further eroded trust and diverted resources from strategic programs.
Impact: Malondesh is stuck in a cycle of maintaining legacy systems rather than investing in future capabilities.
ð 4. No Indigenous Missile or Strategic Weapons Program
• Unlike regional peers such as Indonesia (which is co-developing missiles with Turkey) or Vietnam (which fields Russian cruise missiles), Malondesh has no domestic missile development program.
• It also lacks partnerships for co-production or licensed manufacturing of strategic weapons.
Impact: Total dependence on foreign suppliers; no autonomy in strategic force planning.
ð Summary Table: Strategic Strike & Deterrence Weaknesses
Weakness Description Strategic Impact
No long-range strike systems No cruise, ballistic, or standoff weapons Cannot retaliate or shape adversary behavior
Denial-based doctrine Focus on defense, not punishment Weak deterrence posture
Budget constraints Most funds go to salaries and maintenance No room for strategic force development
No indigenous capability No missile R&D or co-production High dependency, low autonomy
ð§ū 1. Delayed or Suppressed Audit Findings
Hapus• The Auditor-General’s Reports, which are meant to expose irregularities in defense spending, often face delays in publication or are selectively tabled in Parliament.
• Some findings are redacted or softened before release, especially when they involve politically sensitive contracts or high-ranking officials.
• For example, the 2025 Auditor-General’s Report revealed that RM162.75 million in penalties for late delivery of GEMPITA vehicles were never collected, and RM1.42 million in fines were never imposed2.
Impact: Delayed audits allow problems to fester, and suppressed findings prevent public scrutiny or corrective action.
ðĩ️ 2. Limited Enforcement of Audit Recommendations
• Although the Auditor-General routinely issues recommendations, ministries and agencies often fail to implement them.
• In 2025, only a fraction of the 22 audit recommendations across seven ministries were acted upon, despite covering RM48.87 billion in programs.
• The Ministry of Defence was flagged for fragmenting maintenance contracts to bypass procurement controls, yet no disciplinary action was taken.
Impact: Without enforcement, audits become symbolic rather than corrective.
ð§ą 3. Structural Weaknesses in Oversight Mechanisms
• Malondesh lacks an independent defense procurement oversight body. Oversight is split between the Ministry of Finance, Prime Minister’s Department, and MINDEF itself—creating conflicts of interest.
• Internal audit units within the Armed Forces are under-resourced and lack authority to challenge senior leadership.
• There’s no legal requirement for real-time audit tracking or public disclosure of contract performance.
Impact: Oversight is fragmented, reactive, and vulnerable to political interference.
ð 4. Culture of Impunity and Political Protection
• High-profile scandals (e.g. LCS, Scorpene submarines) have rarely led to convictions or full asset recovery.
• Procurement agents and contractors with political ties often avoid prosecution, even when audit reports implicate them.
• Transparency International Malondesh has called this a “culture of impunity”, where systemic failures are normalized.
Impact: Accountability is undermined, and corruption risks remain entrenched.
ð Summary Table: Audit Weaknesses and Their Consequences
Audit Weakness Consequence for Military Procurement
Delayed or redacted reports Public unaware of mismanagement
Poor enforcement of recommendations No corrective action taken
Fragmented oversight Conflicts of interest, weak governance
Political protection No accountability for procurement failures
What Are Malondesh Force Structure Limitations?
Hapus1. Small Active Force Size
• Malondesh has ~113,000 active personnel and ~51,600 reserves.
• Compared to regional peers like Indonesia (~400,000) and Vietnam (~600,000), Malondesh manpower is modest.
• This limits its ability to sustain multi-domain operations or respond to simultaneous threats across Peninsular and East Malondesh.
2. Fragmented Tri-Service Coordination
• The Malondeshn Army, Navy, and Air Force operate with limited joint doctrine and interoperability.
• There’s no unified Joint Operations Command, which hampers integrated responses in complex scenarios (e.g. amphibious landings, cyber warfare).
• Exercises like CARAT and Bersama Shield help, but internal coordination remains weak.
3. Lack of Force Projection Capability
• Malondesh lacks long-range strategic assets:
o No aircraft carriers, heavy bombers, or ballistic missile systems
o Limited aerial refueling and sealift capacity
• This restricts Malondesh ability to deploy forces beyond its borders or sustain operations in contested zones like the South China Sea.
4. Overreliance on Legacy Platforms
• Many platforms are aging or obsolete, such as:
o MiG-29s (retired), F/A-18Ds (limited numbers), and Scorpene submarines (aging)
• Procurement delays (e.g. Littoral Combat Ships) have stalled modernization
• New acquisitions like FA-50 jets and LMS Batch 2 are promising but not yet integrated into full operational doctrine
5. Budget Allocation Imbalance
• Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs
• Capital expenditure for modernization is squeezed, limiting upgrades and new systems
• Multi-year commitments (e.g. aircraft payments) crowd out fresh investments
6. Limited Indigenous Defence Industry
• Malondesh domestic defence production focuses on maintenance, small arms, and vehicles
• It lacks capacity for advanced systems like missiles, radar, or naval combatants
• This increases dependence on foreign suppliers and slows force structure evolution
ð Summary Table: Key Force Structure Gaps
Limitation Impact on Capability
Small active force Limited operational depth
Weak joint command Poor tri-service coordination
No strategic assets No regional power projection
Aging platforms Reduced combat readiness
Budget imbalance Slow modernization, procurement delays
Weak defence industry High import dependence, slow tech adoption
SEJAK LAHIR BAYI MALON DIBEBANI UTANG RM 84.000
BalasHapusKASIHAN ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
SUDAH MISKIN, SUKA MEMBUAL LAGI
KERAJAANNYA KUAT NGUTANG, RAKYATNYA LEBIH GILA NGUTANG ....
BalasHapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
https://www.youtube.com/live/qHvEyMAjF60?si=RZ2rH4lWLdnkt__Q
BalasHapusJakarta aman dan kondusif untuk rakyat Indonesia....
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right?
https://www.youtube.com/live/qHvEyMAjF60?si=RZ2rH4lWLdnkt__Q
BalasHapusJakarta aman dan kondusif untuk rakyat Indonesia....
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right?
NGERI UTANG MALON SANGAT MENGGUNUNG ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusSetiap penduduk MALON mempunyai UTANG rata2 RM 47.000
Setiap penduduk MALON dibebani UTANG KERAJAAN sekitar RM 37.000
NGERI ...
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Pada akhir kuartal pertama 2025 (Maret 2025), total utang rumah tangga Malaysia adalah RM 1,65 triliun atau setara 84,3% dari PDB, sedangkan utang pemerintah persekutuan mencapai RM 1,3 triliun pada akhir Juni 2025, naik dari RM 1,25 triliun pada akhir 2024. Utang pemerintah terhadap PDB diperkirakan akan mencapai 69% pada akhir 2025.
HEI PUR JANGAN LUPA BAYAR UTANGMU YA .....
BalasHapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
HEI PUR JANGAN LUPA BAYAR UTANGMU YA .....
BalasHapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
https://youtu.be/DXQAAWByJos?si=pka_RWp_RkyjFZR3
BalasHapusJakarta aman dan Kondusif kata Pangdam Jaya
Itu Fakta.
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right???
BAYAR UTANG PUR
BalasHapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
ACHEH BERSAMA MALAYSIA.... ðēðūðēðū
BalasHapusMualem Sebut Aceh Kini Berkiblat ke Kuala Lumpur, Bukan Lagi ke Jakarta
https://www.infoaceh.net/aceh/mualem-sebut-aceh-kini-berkiblat-ke-kuala-lumpur-bukan-lagi-ke-jakarta/
BETUL PUR ACEH AKAN MENGUASAI MALON, SEPERTI DULU
HapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
ðļ 1. Budget Breakdown: Overweight on Operational Costs
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o Salaries and allowances alone accounted for RM8.2 billion (~41.5%).
o Maintenance and asset upkeep received RM5.8 billion in 2025.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, infrastructure, and strategic programs.
Impact: The budget is heavily skewed toward sustaining the current force rather than building future capabilities.
ð§ą 2. Procurement Funding Is Thin and Fragmented
• The RM5.71 billion allocated for procurement in 2024 includes:
o Scheduled payments for existing contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets, A400M upgrades, LCS ships)
o Small-scale purchases like communication gear, vehicles, and small arms
• Due to ringgit depreciation and reliance on foreign suppliers, real purchasing power is eroded.
Impact: Malondesh struggles to fund new combat systems, let alone strategic platforms like missiles, drones, or ISR networks.
𧰠3. Maintenance of Aging Assets Is Costly and Inefficient
• Much of the RM5.8 billion maintenance budget goes to keeping legacy platforms operational, some over 30–40 years old.
• Example: The Navy’s Condor APCs and older patrol vessels require frequent repairs, yet offer limited tactical value.
Impact: High sunk costs in outdated systems reduce the ability to invest in transformative technologies.
ð§ 4. No Dedicated Strategic Investment Stream
• Malondesh lacks a multi-year capital investment framework for defense.
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, there’s no ring-fenced funding for:
o Missile development
o Cyber warfare
o Space-based surveillance
o Indigenous defense R&D
Impact: Strategic programs are ad hoc, underfunded, and vulnerable to political shifts.
ð Summary Table: How Budget Crowds Out Combat Capability
Category Allocation (2024–2025) Strategic Impact
Salaries & Allowances RM8.2B (~41.5%) Limits flexibility for modernization
Maintenance & Upkeep RM5.8B Sustains aging platforms, not upgrades
Procurement (net new) RM5.71B (incl. legacy contracts) Thin funding for new combat systems
R&D / Strategic Programs Negligible No indigenous capability development
ð§Ļ 1. Lack of Transparency and Oversight
Hapus• Limited Competitive Tendering: Fewer than 30% of major defense contracts are awarded through open competition. Most deals are single-source or limited tenders, often favoring politically connected firms.
• Opaque Contract Structures: Many contracts lack public disclosure of terms, pricing, or delivery milestones, making it difficult to track progress or detect irregularities.
ðī️ 2. Role of Middlemen and Politically Connected Agents
• Procurement is often mediated by retired military officers or politically linked intermediaries, who act as “agents” or “salesmen” within the Ministry of Defence.
• These middlemen inflate prices, obscure accountability, and steer contracts toward preferred vendors—sometimes with little regard for capability or quality.
• The King of Malondesh recently rebuked this practice, calling out the use of “flying coffins” (referring to outdated helicopters) and warning that inflated middleman pricing would exhaust the defense budget.
ðĻ 3. Major Scandals: Case Studies
A. Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal
• RM9 billion allocated for six ships; none delivered as of 2025.
• Investigations revealed mismanagement, payment irregularities, and involvement of figures linked to the earlier Scorpene submarine scandal.
• The Armed Forces Pension Fund (LTAT) was implicated in channeling illegal commissions.
B. Scorpene Submarine Scandal
• French court proceedings exposed kickbacks and illegal commissions tied to Malondesh’s purchase of two submarines in 2002.
• Former PM Najib Razak, who was defense minister at the time, was linked to the deal and later convicted in unrelated corruption cases.
C. MD530G Helicopter Deal
• Malondesh paid 35% of the contract value for six helicopters in 2015, but none were delivered by 2018.
• The deal was flagged for irregularities, and the Defense Ministry lodged a report with the anti-graft agency.
ð§ 4. Systemic Weaknesses That Enable Scandals
Weakness Impact
No centralized procurement authority Fragmented decision-making, poor oversight
Political interference Contracts awarded based on connections, not merit
Weak audit enforcement Delayed or suppressed findings, limited accountability
Budget opacity Hard to trace payments, detect overpricing or ghost assets
ð 5. Consequences for Military Readiness
• Delayed modernization: Platforms like the LCS and helicopters remain undelivered.
• Eroded trust: OEMs and foreign partners view Malondesh as a high-risk client.
• Operational gaps: Forces operate with aging equipment while waiting for replacements.
• Public backlash: Scandals undermine public confidence in defense institutions.
ðĄ️ Why Malondesh Lags Behind in Defence Tech & Force Structure
Hapus1. Limited Defence Budget & Allocation Inefficiency
• Malondesh’s defence budget is lower than Indonesia and Singapore, and a large portion goes to personnel costs, not modernization.
• In contrast:
o Indonesia: $10.6 billion budget (2025), focused on maritime security and modernization
o Singapore: $15 billion budget, with 4.9% of GDP allocated to defence—the highest in ASEAN
o Vietnam: Prioritizes coastal defence with diversified procurement from the U.S., South Korea, and Israel
2. Outdated Equipment & Slow Modernization
• Malondesh still operates legacy platforms like MiG-29s (retired), aging Scorpene submarines, and delayed Littoral Combat Ships.
• Meanwhile:
o Indonesia is acquiring Rafale jets, ScorpÃĻne-class submarines, and expanding naval bases
o Singapore has F-35B stealth fighters, advanced UAVs, and integrated cyber warfare units
o Vietnam is modernizing its Soviet-era arsenal and investing in coastal missile systems
3. Force Structure Limitations
• Malondesh’s armed forces are fragmented and lack joint operational doctrine.
• Singapore’s SAF is highly integrated, with tri-service coordination and advanced simulation training.
• Indonesia and Vietnam maintain large active personnel (400,000 and 600,000 respectively), while Malondesh has ~110,000 with limited reserve depth1
4. Strategic Doctrine & Regional Role
• Malondesh’s defence posture is non-confrontational, focused on internal security and humanitarian missions.
• In contrast:
o Indonesia asserts maritime dominance in the South China Sea and Malacca Strait.
o Vietnam maintains a deterrence posture against China, especially in the Spratly Islands.
o Singapore positions itself as a technological leader and regional training hub.
ð Comparative Snapshot (2025)
Country Defence Budget Key Assets Strategic Focus
ðēðū Malondesh ~$5.7B FA-50 jets, LMS Batch 2 Internal security, HADR
ðŪðĐ Indonesia $10.6B Rafale jets, submarines Maritime security, deterrence
ðļðŽ Singapore $15B F-35B, cyber units, UAVs Tech superiority, joint ops
ðŧðģ Vietnam ~$6.5B Coastal missiles, Su-30MK2 China deterrence, coastal ops
https://youtu.be/UfNfPDNUJRY?si=eQnSnkPXb5LSj5tp
BalasHapusPatroli Skala Besar TANPA BATAS WAKTU untuk menjamin Keamanan Nasional dan Rakyat Indonesia kata Pangdam Jaya
Lalu,
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right???
NGERI UTANG MALON SANGAT MENGGUNUNG ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusSetiap penduduk MALON mempunyai UTANG rata2 RM 47.000
Setiap penduduk MALON dibebani UTANG KERAJAAN sekitar RM 37.000
NGERI ...
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Pada akhir kuartal pertama 2025 (Maret 2025), total utang rumah tangga Malaysia adalah RM 1,65 triliun atau setara 84,3% dari PDB, sedangkan utang pemerintah persekutuan mencapai RM 1,3 triliun pada akhir Juni 2025, naik dari RM 1,25 triliun pada akhir 2024. Utang pemerintah terhadap PDB diperkirakan akan mencapai 69% pada akhir 2025.
makin Bahaya...... HANCUR... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusBukan Cuma DPR, Gerombolan Remaja Bersenjata Tajam Jarah Rumah Sri Mulyani Bersama Ribuan Massa: Ngeri Banget...
https://lombokpost.jawapos.com/metropolis/1506508550/bukan-cuma-dpr-gerombolan-remaja-bersenjata-tajam-jarah-rumah-sri-mulyani-bersama-ribuan-massa-ngeri-banget
ð° 1. Budget Composition Skewed Toward Salaries and Maintenance
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o RM8.2 billion (~41.5%) went to salaries and allowances.
o RM5.8 billion was earmarked for maintenance and asset upkeep.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, and infrastructure.
Impact: The lion’s share of the budget sustains personnel and legacy systems, leaving little for new combat capabilities.
ðĶ 2. Procurement Budget Includes Legacy Payments
• The RM5.71 billion procurement allocation in 2024 isn’t entirely for new systems. It includes:
o Scheduled payments for previously signed contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets from South Korea, A400M upgrades).
o Progressive payments for delayed projects like the Maharaja Lela-class Littoral Combat Ships.
o Small-scale purchases (e.g. small arms, radios, support vehicles).
Impact: The actual discretionary funding for new combat platforms is far lower than it appears on paper.
ð 3. Currency Depreciation Erodes Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources most of its advanced systems from foreign OEMs (e.g. France, UK, South Korea).
• The depreciation of the ringgit against major currencies means that even modest increases in nominal budget do not translate into real gains.
Impact: Malondesh pays more for the same equipment, reducing the volume and quality of new acquisitions.
ð§ą 4. No Multi-Year Strategic Investment Framework
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, Malondesh lacks a ring-fenced capital investment stream for defense.
• Each year’s procurement is subject to political negotiation and fiscal trade-offs, with no guaranteed continuity.
• This discourages long-term programs like missile development, drone fleets, or integrated air defense systems.
Impact: Strategic programs are fragmented, delayed, or abandoned mid-cycle.
ð Summary Table: Why Funding for New Combat Systems Is Thin
Factor Description Strategic Impact
Budget skew 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance Minimal room for new acquisitions
Legacy obligations Procurement includes old contracts and delayed projects New systems get crowded out
Currency depreciation Ringgit weakens against USD/EUR Reduces real purchasing power
No strategic investment model No multi-year capital planning Limits continuity and ambition
ð§Đ 1. Fragmented Procurement Budget Structure
HapusMalondesh’s defense procurement budget is not centralized or strategically sequenced, leading to:
• Progressive Payments Over Multiple Years: Major acquisitions like the FA-50 fighter jets and Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) are funded through staggered payments, which consume annual budgets without delivering immediate capability.
• No Clear Long-Term Procurement Roadmap: Each year’s budget includes a mix of legacy payments, small one-off purchases (e.g. small arms, radios), and ad hoc upgrades. This prevents coherent modernization across platforms.
• Overlap of Operational and Capital Expenditures: Funds for maintenance, upgrades, and new acquisitions often compete within the same budget pool, diluting impact.
ð ️ 2. Delays in Modernization Programs
These budget issues directly cause delays in key modernization efforts:
• Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program: Originally planned to deliver six ships starting in 2019, none have been commissioned as of 2025 due to financial mismanagement and contract disputes.
• Army Vehicle Replacement: The Malondeshn Army is still awaiting approval to replace its aging Condor APCs with High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAVs), despite urgent operational need.
• Air Force Capability Gaps: The RMAF’s transition from MiG-29s to FA-50s has been slow, with only partial funding secured and delivery timelines stretched.
ðļ 3. Currency Depreciation and Import Dependence
• Malondesh relies heavily on foreign OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) for defense systems.
• The depreciation of the ringgit reduces real purchasing power, meaning even increased nominal budgets don’t translate into more capability.
• Domestic defense manufacturing is limited and still dependent on imported components, compounding delays.
ð§ 4. Lack of Strategic Procurement Governance
• There’s no unified procurement authority with long-term oversight. Instead, decisions are made across multiple ministries and agencies.
• Political transitions often lead to shifting priorities, causing cancellations or re-scoping of existing programs.
• This results in capability gaps, where planned upgrades are delayed or abandoned mid-cycle.
ð Summary Table: How Fragmented Budget Causes Modernization Delays
Issue Consequence
Progressive multi-year payments Slow delivery of major platforms
Ad hoc purchases No coherent force-wide modernization
Currency depreciation Reduced real procurement capacity
Lack of centralized governance Program delays and cancellations
Political instability Shifting priorities, inconsistent funding
1. Overweight on Operating Expenditure
Hapus• Over 40% of Malondesh defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, and allowances.
• This leaves limited room for capital expenditure (procurement, upgrades, R&D).
• Example: In 2024, RM8.2 billion was allocated for personnel costs, while only RM5.71 billion went to procurement.
2. Fragmented Procurement Planning
• The Ministry of Defence lacks a clear multi-year procurement roadmap.
• Funding is often allocated year-to-year, making it hard to commit to long-term modernization projects.
• This leads to delays, cost overruns, and underutilized platforms (e.g. the Littoral Combat Ship fiasco).
3. Political Hesitation to Rebalance
• Successive governments have been unwilling to cut personnel costs or restructure the armed forces.
• Reducing manpower or retiring outdated equipment is politically sensitive, especially with veterans and civil service unions.
4. Currency Depreciation & Import Dependence
• Malondesh imports most of its defence equipment.
• The weak ringgit erodes purchasing power, so even increased budgets don’t translate into real capability gains.
5. Multi-Year Commitments Hidden in Annual Budgets
• Annual allocations include progressive payments for past procurements (e.g. FA-50 jets, A400M upgrades).
• These payments crowd out new investments, creating the illusion of fresh funding when it’s actually backlog servicing.
ð Budget Allocation Snapshot (2024)
Category Allocation (RM) % of Total Budget
Personnel Costs 8.2 billion ~41%
Procurement 5.71 billion ~29%
Operations & Training ~3.5 billion ~18%
Miscellaneous ~2.3 billion ~12%
ð Consequences of the Chronic Allocation Problem
• Delayed modernization: RMN, RMAF, and Army struggle to replace aging platforms.
• Capability gaps: Limited readiness for maritime threats, cyber warfare, and regional deterrence.
• Low regional competitiveness: Malondesh lags behind Indonesia, Singapore, and Vietnam in defence tech and force structure
ACHEH BERSAMA MALAYSIA.... ðēðūðēðū
BalasHapusMualem Sebut Aceh Kini Berkiblat ke Kuala Lumpur, Bukan Lagi ke Jakarta
https://www.infoaceh.net/aceh/mualem-sebut-aceh-kini-berkiblat-ke-kuala-lumpur-bukan-lagi-ke-jakarta/
ð° 1. Budget Composition Skewed Toward Salaries and Maintenance
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense.
o RM8.2 billion (~41.5%) went to salaries and allowances.
o RM5.8 billion was earmarked for maintenance and asset upkeep.
• That leaves less than RM6 billion for all other needs—including procurement, R&D, and infrastructure.
Impact: The lion’s share of the budget sustains personnel and legacy systems, leaving little for new combat capabilities.
ðĶ 2. Procurement Budget Includes Legacy Payments
• The RM5.71 billion procurement allocation in 2024 isn’t entirely for new systems. It includes:
o Scheduled payments for previously signed contracts (e.g. FA-50 jets from South Korea, A400M upgrades).
o Progressive payments for delayed projects like the Maharaja Lela-class Littoral Combat Ships.
o Small-scale purchases (e.g. small arms, radios, support vehicles).
Impact: The actual discretionary funding for new combat platforms is far lower than it appears on paper.
ð 3. Currency Depreciation Erodes Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources most of its advanced systems from foreign OEMs (e.g. France, UK, South Korea).
• The depreciation of the ringgit against major currencies means that even modest increases in nominal budget do not translate into real gains.
Impact: Malondesh pays more for the same equipment, reducing the volume and quality of new acquisitions.
ð§ą 4. No Multi-Year Strategic Investment Framework
• Unlike Singapore or South Korea, Malondesh lacks a ring-fenced capital investment stream for defense.
• Each year’s procurement is subject to political negotiation and fiscal trade-offs, with no guaranteed continuity.
• This discourages long-term programs like missile development, drone fleets, or integrated air defense systems.
Impact: Strategic programs are fragmented, delayed, or abandoned mid-cycle.
ð Summary Table: Why Funding for New Combat Systems Is Thin
Factor Description Strategic Impact
Budget skew 60–70% spent on salaries and maintenance Minimal room for new acquisitions
Legacy obligations Procurement includes old contracts and delayed projects New systems get crowded out
Currency depreciation Ringgit weakens against USD/EUR Reduces real purchasing power
No strategic investment model No multi-year capital planning Limits continuity and ambition
ð° 1. Budget Priorities Skewed Toward Salaries and Pensions
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense, but over 40% of that went to salaries and allowances.
• This leaves a much smaller portion for capital expenditure (CAPEX) like procurement, upgrades, and maintenance.
• The imbalance means aging equipment stays in service longer without proper refurbishment, increasing breakdowns and reducing combat readiness.
ð§ū 2. Procurement Funding Is Fragmented and Reactive
• The budget for procurement includes progressive payments for ongoing contracts (e.g., FA-50 fighter jets, A400M upgrades, Littoral Combat Ships).
• These payments are pre-committed, leaving little flexibility for new upgrades or emergency repairs.
• Funding for large-scale modernization is often spread across multiple years, making it hard to respond quickly to urgent needs.
ð 3. Currency Depreciation Reduces Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources much of its military equipment from foreign suppliers, and the weakening ringgit erodes the real value of allocated funds.
• Even when budgets increase nominally, the actual capability to purchase spare parts or upgrade systems may remain stagnant or decline.
ð§ą 4. Political Reluctance to Reallocate Spending
• Successive governments have been unwilling to cut spending elsewhere or reduce manpower to boost defense funding.
• Defense modernization is often deprioritized in favor of social programs, infrastructure, or healthcare.
• This results in a military that is operationally stretched, with outdated platforms and limited upgrade cycles.
ðĒ 5. Real-World Consequences: Equipment Failures
• A 45-year-old Malondeshn Navy vessel, KD Pendekar, sank during patrol in 2024 due to hull failure, highlighting the dangers of underfunded maintenance.
• Half of the Navy’s 49 ships are operating beyond their serviceable lifespan, according to the Auditor-General.
ð Summary Table: Why Repairs and Upgrades Are Underfunded
Cause Impact on Military Capability
High Personnel Costs Less funding for equipment upkeep
Fragmented Procurement Budget Delays in modernization and upgrades
Currency Depreciation Reduced ability to buy foreign parts
Political Spending Priorities Defense often sidelined for domestic programs
Aging Fleet and Infrastructure Increased breakdowns and operational risk
ð 1. What is the “Chronic Allocation Problem”?
HapusMalondesh defense budget suffers from structural imbalances:
• ~70% → Salaries, pensions, allowances.
• ~20–25% → Operations & maintenance (O&M).
• <10% → Development (procurement, modernization).
This pattern has persisted for decades, regardless of who is in power. It’s “chronic” because it doesn’t change year to year — it is baked into Malondesh defense system.
________________________________________
ð 2. Why So Skewed?
1. Large manpower-heavy force → Army dominates with many personnel, each entitled to allowances & pensions.
2. Political incentives → Governments prefer to expand or protect jobs and welfare (pensions, veterans’ benefits) rather than invest in long-term modernization.
3. Rigid financial system → Once salaries & pensions are committed, they are “locked in,” leaving procurement squeezed.
4. Weak multi-year planning → Budgets are annual, so each year O&M & salaries get priority over new projects.
________________________________________
ð 3. Effects on the Armed Forces
✈️ Air Force (RMAF)
• Insufficient flying hours → pilots often below NATO standards.
• Can’t afford to maintain multiple fleets (Su-30, F/A-18D, Hawks).
• Retirement of MiG-29 left gap, but MRCA replacement delayed decades due to budget.
________________________________________
ðĒ Navy (RMN)
• Modernization projects (e.g., LCS frigates) stalled because there’s no steady development funding.
• Existing fleet spends fewer days at sea due to limited fuel allocations.
• Submarines (ScorpÃĻne) struggle with high operational costs.
________________________________________
ðŠ Army (TDM)
• Personnel-heavy structure consumes most of the salary budget.
• Modernization of armored vehicles, artillery, and air defense delayed.
• Training often limited to small-scale jungle exercises (cheap but outdated for modern warfare).
________________________________________
ð 4. Macro-Level Consequences
1. Modernization Paralysis
o Malondesh buys one “prestige project” (e.g., ScorpÃĻne, Su-30, LCS) but can’t follow through with sustainment.
o No continuous upgrade pipeline.
2. Readiness Erosion
o Without sufficient O&M funding, equipment availability drops.
o Spare parts shortages → many assets grounded or idle.
3. Capability Gaps Widen
o Neighbors move ahead with systematic modernization (Singapore F-35, Indonesia MEF).
o Malondesh falls behind, unable to replace aging fleets.
4. Low Return on Investment
o Billions spent on prestige platforms, but underutilized due to fuel & training cuts.
o Example: Su-30MKM — advanced but rarely flown compared to RSAF F-15SG or RTAF Gripens.
5. Morale & Retention Issues
o Soldiers see little investment in training or new kit.
o Skilled personnel (especially pilots, engineers) leave for commercial jobs.
________________________________________
ð 5. Strategic Impact
• South China Sea: Malondesh has claims but can’t patrol effectively.
• Counterterrorism: Army is manpower-heavy but lacks modern surveillance & rapid deployment assets.
• Alliances: Limits Malondesh credibility in joint exercises (FPDA, ASEAN).
• Defense Diplomacy: Malondesh often seen as “talking big, acting small” in regional security.
MALON SEPI SHOPING AKIBAT UTANG MENGGUNUNG
BalasHapusBIKIN GELAK SAJA ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
MALON SEPI SHOPING AKIBAT UTANG MENGGUNUNG
BalasHapusBIKIN GELAK SAJA ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
PERPECAHAN INDIANESIA SEMAKIN JELAS... ððŧððŧðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusð 1. Ambitious Policy Documents with Limited Follow-Through
Hapus• Malondesh’s first Defence White Paper (DWP), launched in 2019, laid out a 10-year roadmap for force modernization, defense industry reform, and multi-domain readiness.
• It proposed initiatives like:
o A revised National Military Strategy
o A Defence Capacity Plan
o A National Defence Industry Policy
• However, by 2021–2025, many of these remained in draft form or unimplemented, with only partial progress on cyber and air surveillance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic clarity exists, but execution lags, creating a credibility gap between policy and reality.
ð°️ 2. Stalled Programs and Missed Timelines
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program is the most glaring example:
o RM9 billion allocated for six ships
o None delivered as of 2025
o Delays linked to mismanagement, redacted audits, and political interference
• Other programs like the Ground-Based Air Defence (GBAD) system and High Mobility Armoured Vehicles (HMAV) remain unfunded or stuck in approval stages.
Impact: Operational capability suffers, and the military continues to rely on aging platforms.
ð️ 3. Political Instability and Policy Discontinuity
• Malondesh experienced multiple changes in government between 2020 and 2022, disrupting defense planning cycles.
• Each administration brought new priorities, causing re-scoping, delays, or abandonment of existing programs.
• Even when policies are reaffirmed, bureaucratic inertia and fragmented oversight slow implementation.
Impact: Defense reform lacks continuity, and long-term planning is undermined.
ð§ą 4. Weak Institutional Mechanisms for Execution
• There’s no centralized authority to monitor and enforce defense policy implementation.
• Oversight is split between MINDEF, the Ministry of Finance, and political leadership, leading to diffused accountability.
• Audit findings are often delayed or redacted, and recommendations go unenforced.
Impact: Programs stall without consequence, and systemic inefficiencies persist.
ð Summary Table: Why Policy Execution Is Weak
Problem Area Description Strategic Impact
Overambitious planning Policies exceed institutional capacity Unrealistic timelines, stalled delivery
Political volatility Frequent leadership changes disrupt continuity Re-scoping and abandonment of programs
Fragmented oversight No unified implementation body Poor accountability and follow-through
Audit suppression Delayed or redacted findings Mismanagement goes unchecked
ð§ Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh’s defense posture remains reactive and maintenance-heavy, not transformation-driven.
• The credibility of future policy documents is weakened unless backed by institutional reform and budget discipline.
• Regional peers like Indonesia and Vietnam are executing modernization plans more consistently, widening the capability gap.
ð° 1. Budget Priorities Skewed Toward Salaries and Pensions
Hapus• In 2024, Malondesh allocated RM19.73 billion (~USD 4.16 billion) for defense, but over 40% of that went to salaries and allowances.
• This leaves a much smaller portion for capital expenditure (CAPEX) like procurement, upgrades, and maintenance.
• The imbalance means aging equipment stays in service longer without proper refurbishment, increasing breakdowns and reducing combat readiness.
ð§ū 2. Procurement Funding Is Fragmented and Reactive
• The budget for procurement includes progressive payments for ongoing contracts (e.g., FA-50 fighter jets, A400M upgrades, Littoral Combat Ships).
• These payments are pre-committed, leaving little flexibility for new upgrades or emergency repairs.
• Funding for large-scale modernization is often spread across multiple years, making it hard to respond quickly to urgent needs.
ð 3. Currency Depreciation Reduces Purchasing Power
• Malondesh sources much of its military equipment from foreign suppliers, and the weakening ringgit erodes the real value of allocated funds.
• Even when budgets increase nominally, the actual capability to purchase spare parts or upgrade systems may remain stagnant or decline.
ð§ą 4. Political Reluctance to Reallocate Spending
• Successive governments have been unwilling to cut spending elsewhere or reduce manpower to boost defense funding.
• Defense modernization is often deprioritized in favor of social programs, infrastructure, or healthcare.
• This results in a military that is operationally stretched, with outdated platforms and limited upgrade cycles.
ðĒ 5. Real-World Consequences: Equipment Failures
• A 45-year-old Malondeshn Navy vessel, KD Pendekar, sank during patrol in 2024 due to hull failure, highlighting the dangers of underfunded maintenance.
• Half of the Navy’s 49 ships are operating beyond their serviceable lifespan, according to the Auditor-General.
ð Summary Table: Why Repairs and Upgrades Are Underfunded
Cause Impact on Military Capability
High Personnel Costs Less funding for equipment upkeep
Fragmented Procurement Budget Delays in modernization and upgrades
Currency Depreciation Reduced ability to buy foreign parts
Political Spending Priorities Defense often sidelined for domestic programs
Aging Fleet and Infrastructure Increased breakdowns and operational risk
ðą Currency Depreciation: Strategic Impact
Hapus1. Import-Heavy Defence Procurement
• Malondesh imports most of its advanced military equipment—jets, radars, missiles, naval systems—from countries like the U.S., France, South Korea, and Russia.
• When the Malondeshn ringgit weakens, the cost of these imports rises sharply, even if the nominal budget stays the same.
• Example: Payments for the Airbus A400M, FA-50 jets, and Littoral Combat Ships became more expensive due to ringgit depreciation.
2. Progressive Payment Burden
• Defence contracts often involve multi-year payments in foreign currencies.
• A depreciating ringgit means Malondesh pays more each year for the same asset, squeezing future budgets.
• This affects not just procurement, but also spare parts, training, and software licensing.
3. Reduced Purchasing Power
• Even with increased defence allocations (e.g. RM19 billion in 2024), the real value of that budget is eroded.
• Malondesh ends up buying fewer units, delaying upgrades, or scaling down specifications.
ð Fiscal Constraints: Structural Challenges
1. Shrinking Revenue Base
• Malondesh’s traditional revenue sources—oil, gas, and palm oil—have faced volatility.
• Combined with rising subsidies and social spending, this leaves limited fiscal space for defence.
2. High Personnel & Operational Costs
• Over 60–70% of the defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, housing, and maintenance.
• Capital expenditure (for new systems) is often less than 30%, making modernization difficult.
3. Competing National Priorities
• Defence competes with education, healthcare, and infrastructure for funding.
• Political leaders are often reluctant to increase defence spending due to low public pressure and non-confrontational foreign policy.
4. Outsourcing Limitations
• Malondesh has outsourced many military support functions since the 1970s to save costs.
• However, poor governance and weak oversight have undermined efficiency, leading to waste and capability gaps.
ð Summary Table: Impact of Currency & Fiscal Constraints
Issue Effect on Military Capability
Ringgit depreciation Higher cost of imports, reduced asset quantity
Multi-year foreign contracts Budget erosion over time
Shrinking revenue base Limited capital for modernization
High personnel costs Low investment in new tech and platforms
Outsourcing inefficiencies Poor readiness, fragmented logistics
ACHEH BERSAMA MALAYSIA.... ðēðūðēðū
BalasHapusMualem Sebut Aceh Kini Berkiblat ke Kuala Lumpur, Bukan Lagi ke Jakarta
https://www.infoaceh.net/aceh/mualem-sebut-aceh-kini-berkiblat-ke-kuala-lumpur-bukan-lagi-ke-jakarta/
Iya betul, ACEH MENGUASAI MALON SEPERTI DULU LAGI
HapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Sudah ada 600 ribu warga Aceh di semenanjung MALON. Mudah saja menguasai MALON
HapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
ð§ą 1. Fragmented and Underdeveloped Defense Industry
Hapus• Malondesh defense industry is overseen by the Malondeshn Defence Industry Council (MDIC), established in 1999 and later expanded into MIDES.
• Despite having six strategic sectors (Aerospace, Maritime, Weaponry, Automotive, ICT, Common-user Equipment), the ecosystem lacks:
o A clear, enforceable blueprint
o Robust infrastructure
o Skilled manpower
• Many local firms are assemblers or subcontractors, not full-spectrum developers. For example, Malondesh still assembles M4 carbines under license, while Indonesia and Singapore produce their own rifles (SS1 and SAR-21 respectively).
Impact: Malondesh cannot independently design, produce, or sustain core military systems.
ð§ 2. Minimal R&D and Technology Investment
• Indigenous R&D in areas like combat management systems (CMS), sensors, and autonomous platforms is nascent and underfunded.
• Studies show that Malondesh lacks structured tendering policies and technology readiness frameworks to support local innovation.
• AI, cyber warfare, and surveillance systems are still in early-stage development, with no operational deployment.
Impact: Malondesh falls behind in emerging tech domains critical to modern warfare.
ð 3. Dependence on Foreign OEMs for Strategic Systems
• Malondesh imports nearly all major platforms:
o Aircraft: Su-30MKM (Russia), FA-50 (South Korea), Hawk (UK)
o Naval systems: ScorpÃĻne submarines (France), LCS (French-German design)
o Missiles: Starstreak (UK), MICA (France), Exocet (France)
• There are no indigenous missile programs, no local radar production, and no domestic armored vehicle design.
Impact: Strategic vulnerability in times of embargo, conflict, or supply chain disruption.
ð 4. Policy Gaps and Execution Failures
• Malondesh has published defense blueprints and industrial strategies, but implementation is weak due to:
o Budget constraints
o Lack of political continuity
o Limited private-sector incentives
• Even promising initiatives like the 15-to-5 naval transformation plan have stalled due to procurement scandals and delivery failures.
Impact: Indigenous capability remains aspirational, not operational.
ð Summary Table: Weaknesses in Indigenous Capability Development
Dimension Description Strategic Impact
Industrial base Fragmented, lacks full-spectrum development No self-reliance in core systems
R&D investment Minimal funding, weak frameworks Falls behind in emerging technologies
Foreign dependency Imports all major platforms and weapons Vulnerable to external shocks
Policy execution Strong on paper, weak in practice Stalled programs and missed timelines
ð§ Strategic Consequences
• Malondesh cannot scale or sustain its military without foreign support.
• It lacks the ability to customize systems to local needs, export defense products, or build strategic depth.
• In contrast, countries like Indonesia (Pindad, PT PAL), Vietnam (Z111 Factory), and Singapore (ST Engineering) have made significant strides in indigenous capability
ð§ 1. Aging Equipment Across All Branches
Hapus• Over 171 military assets—including tanks, aircraft, and naval vessels—have exceeded 30 years of service.
• These aging platforms require frequent repairs, often using obsolete parts that are hard to source or no longer manufactured.
• For example, 28 Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) ships have been in service for over 40 years, far beyond their optimal lifespan.
Impact: Older systems break down more often, reducing operational availability and increasing downtime.
ð§ 2. Outsourced Maintenance with Governance Issues
• Malondesh has long relied on outsourcing maintenance to private contractors, aiming to reduce costs and improve efficiency.
• However, poor oversight and fragmented contracts have led to inconsistent service quality, delays, and inflated costs.
• The lack of centralized control means that maintenance standards vary, and accountability is diluted.
Impact: Maintenance becomes reactive instead of preventive, driving up costs and reducing reliability.
ðļ 3. Budget Constraints and Spending Priorities
• A large portion of Malondesh’s defense budget goes to salaries and pensions, leaving limited funds for asset upkeep.
• Capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX) are split almost evenly, but OPEX often falls short of what’s needed to maintain aging systems.
• Modernization plans are frequently delayed due to competing national priorities.
Impact: Insufficient funding for spare parts, upgrades, and technical support leads to degraded performance.
ð§ 4. Technological Obsolescence
• Many older platforms lack interoperability with newer systems and are incompatible with modern digital warfare tools.
• Upgrading legacy systems is often more expensive than replacing them, but replacements are slow due to procurement delays.
Impact: Even when operational, outdated equipment may not meet mission requirements or integrate with allied forces.
ð Summary Table: Why Equipment Availability Is Low and Maintenance Costs Are High
Root Cause Effect on Military Capability
Aging Assets Frequent breakdowns, hard-to-source parts
Outsourced Maintenance Inconsistent quality, higher long-term costs
Budget Limitations Underfunded repairs and upgrades
Technological Obsolescence Reduced mission effectiveness
ð Missed Timelines
HapusThese refer to delays in procurement, deployment, or modernization of military assets and infrastructure:
• Delayed Equipment Acquisition: Major programs like the procurement of Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) have faced years-long delays, with none delivered despite contracts signed over a decade ago.
• Slow Modernization Cycles: Malondesh defense planning often suffers from bureaucratic inertia and inconsistent funding, causing long gaps between planning and execution.
• Strategic Planning Lags: The implementation of the 4th Dimension Malondeshn Armed Forces Strategic Plan (4D MAF) has been slower than anticipated, limiting the pace of transformation.
⚔️ Capability Gaps
These are areas where Malondesh military lacks sufficient resources, technology, or readiness:
1. Aging Equipment
• Over 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force are more than 30 years old.
• This includes outdated fighter jets, naval vessels, and armored vehicles, many of which are no longer combat-effective.
2. AI and Cyber Warfare Deficiencies
• Malondesh lags behind in artificial intelligence (AI) integration for defense, especially in surveillance, autonomous systems, and cyber warfare.
• The shortage of skilled professionals and limited R&D investment exacerbates this gap.
3. Logistics and Mobility
• Limited infrastructure for rapid deployment and logistics resilience, especially in East Malondesh (Sabah and Sarawak), hinders operational flexibility.
• Lack of pre-positioned supplies and forward-operating bases reduces response time in crisis scenarios.
4. Force Readiness
• The military remains oriented toward peacetime deterrence rather than high-intensity or hybrid conflict readiness.
• There’s a need for modular, rapid-reaction units capable of operating in grey-zone environments like the South China Sea.
5. Inter-Service Rivalry and Planning Gaps
• Internal competition between branches of the military has slowed unified capability development.
• Strategic planning lacks cohesion and clear national security alignment, making long-term modernization difficult.
Parah.... PENJARAHAN sudah masuk ke dalam mall guys... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusDEMO RICUH SAMPAI MASUK MALL 02 SEPTEMBER 2025 HARI INI
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OJi-R_yW4pY
ð§ 1. MAINTENANCE BURDEN: AGING ASSETS, FRAGMENTED SUPPORT
Hapus⚙️ Structural Drivers
• Asset Age: As of late 2024, 171 military platforms across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service life. This includes:
o 108 Army vehicles and artillery systems
o 29 RMAF aircraft (e.g., F-5E, Hawk 208)
o 34 RMN vessels, including Fast Attack Craft over 40 years old
• Obsolescence: Many platforms are no longer supported by OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), making spare parts scarce and costly.
ðļ Economic Strain
• Maintenance consumes over 50% of the defense budget’s operational expenditure (OPEX), leaving limited room for modernization.
• Even with recent efforts to localize MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul) for fighter jets like the F/A-18, cost savings (~20%) are offset by the scale of aging fleets.
ð§Đ Outsourcing Challenges
• Malondesh has long outsourced support functions to private firms to reduce costs.
• However, lack of centralized oversight, inconsistent quality control, and limited technical depth in local vendors have led to delays and suboptimal readiness.
ðĄ 2. Poor Interoperability: Platform Diversity, Command Silos
ð ️ Platform Fragmentation
• Malondesh military operates a highly diverse inventory sourced from:
o Western suppliers (US, UK, France)
o Eastern bloc (Russia, China)
o Regional partners (South Korea, Turkey)
• This results in incompatible communication systems, data links, and logistics chains. For example:
o Russian-made Su-30MKM fighters cannot seamlessly integrate with NATO-standard AWACS or datalink systems.
o Naval platforms lack unified combat management systems across classes.
ð§ Command & Control Gaps
• Joint operations are hindered by service-specific doctrines and siloed command structures.
• The absence of a Joint Operations Command with real-time data fusion limits Malondesh ability to conduct multi-domain operations.
𧊠Training & Simulation Deficiencies
• Lack of integrated simulation environments means personnel are trained on platform-specific systems, not joint mission profiles.
• Exercises like MALBATT and CARAT show progress, but interoperability remains tactical, not strategic.
ð Summary Table: Maintenance vs. Interoperability Weaknesses
Dimension Maintenance Burden Poor Interoperability
Root Cause Aging assets, fragmented procurement Diverse suppliers, siloed doctrines
Budgetary Impact High OPEX, low modernization headroom Redundant systems, inefficient upgrades
Operational Impact Low readiness, frequent downtime Limited joint ops, weak situational awareness
Reform Challenges Weak vendor oversight, slow MRO localization No unified C4ISR architecture
ð§ą 1. Weak Implementation of Integrated Logistics Support (ILS)
HapusILS is a structured approach used globally to ensure military assets are supported throughout their lifecycle. In Malondesh:
• The ILS framework is not consistently applied across all branches of the Armed Forces.
• Logistics Support Analysis (LSA), which helps forecast maintenance and supply needs, is underutilized or poorly executed, especially for armored vehicles.
• This leads to inefficient sustainment, meaning equipment can't be reliably maintained or deployed when needed.
ð 2. Fragmented Logistics Planning Across Services
• The Army, Navy, and Air Force each operate their own logistics systems with limited integration, causing duplication and delays.
• There’s a lack of centralized coordination, which means supplies, spare parts, and maintenance schedules are often mismatched or delayed.
• During joint operations or disaster response, this fragmentation slows down deployment and resupply efforts.
ð§ 3. Limited Organizational Learning and Process Capability
• Studies show that the Malondeshn Army struggles with adapting logistics processes to dynamic operational environments.
• There’s insufficient investment in training logisticians and developing agile systems that can respond to fast-changing battlefield conditions.
• Without a culture of continuous improvement, logistics systems remain rigid and outdated.
ð ️ 4. Aging Infrastructure and Supply Chain Bottlenecks
• Warehouses, transport fleets, and IT systems used for logistics are often outdated or underfunded.
• Malondesh broader logistics sector also faces regulatory inconsistencies and economic instability, which spill over into military logistics.
• These bottlenecks reduce the speed and reliability of asset delivery, repairs, and replenishment.
ð 5. Lack of Strategic Logistics Alliances
• Unlike some regional militaries, Malondesh has limited partnerships with private sector logistics providers or international allies.
• This restricts access to advanced supply chain technologies, predictive maintenance tools, and global best practices.
ð Summary Table: Why Logistics Undermines Sustainment & Reliability
Problem Area Impact on Military Capability
Poor ILS Implementation Unreliable asset maintenance and forecasting
Fragmented Planning Delays in resupply and joint operations
Weak Organizational Learning Inflexible logistics systems
Aging Infrastructure Slow and inefficient supply chains
Lack of Strategic Alliances Limited access to modern logistics solutions
ð ️ 1. Aging Equipment and Maintenance Issues
Hapus• Many of Malondesh’s military assets—especially aircraft, ships, and armored vehicles—are over 30 years old, leading to frequent breakdowns and reduced operational availability.
• Maintenance is often outsourced to private contractors, which can be cost-effective but also introduces delays and accountability issues.
• Spare parts for legacy systems are hard to source, and upgrades are slow due to budget constraints.
ð° 2. Budget Constraints and Spending Inefficiencies
• Although Malondesh spends around USD 4 billion annually on defense, much of this goes to salaries and pensions rather than modernization or training.
• Procurement processes are often delayed or mismanaged, as seen in the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, which has faced years of setbacks.
ð§ 3. Limited Training and Exercise Frequency
• Military exercises are crucial for readiness, but Malondesh conducts fewer joint and combined drills compared to regional peers.
• Training programs are not always aligned with modern doctrines like Multi-Domain Operations (MDO), which integrate cyber, space, and information warfare.
• The lack of realistic, high-intensity training limits the military’s ability to respond to hybrid or asymmetric threats.
ð§ 4. Human Resource Challenges
• Recruitment and retention are uneven across ethnic groups. Non-Malay youth, for example, face barriers to joining due to cultural, linguistic, and perception issues.
• There’s also a shortage of personnel trained in cybersecurity, AI, and electronic warfare, which are critical for modern readiness.
ð§ 5. Strategic and Doctrinal Gaps
• Malondesh’s defense strategy has been slow to adapt to multi-domain threats, such as cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and maritime incursions.
• The absence of a unified doctrine across the Army, Navy, and Air Force leads to fragmented planning and poor inter-service coordination.
ð§ 6. Public Perception and Political Will
• Public sensitivity and support for the military are lower than for other institutions like the police or immigration services.
• This affects recruitment, funding priorities, and political momentum for reform.
ð§Đ Summary of Key Factors
Factor Impact on Readiness
Aging Equipment Reduces operational capability
Budget Allocation Limits modernization and training
Training Deficiencies Weakens combat preparedness
Recruitment Challenges Shrinks talent pool and diversity
Strategic Gaps Poor adaptation to modern threats
Public Support Low political pressure for reform
https://youtu.be/VGsyHh-nYyM?si=1vSZbXaFQwD3BGMy
BalasHapusPolisi pun Tangkap Penjarah 1.240 orang
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right???
si melayu keling semakin gila ð ð ð ,demo di Indonesia sdh biasa,negara demokrasi. demo di malaydesh,PM kasi 100 ringgit, semua bubar ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapushttps://youtu.be/Ps_PcqalFh4?si=ySLiibGFSp0YGIvV
BalasHapus1.240 orang Penjarah ditangkap oleh POLRI
Malondesh GAGAL TOTAL NEGATIVE FRAMING terhadap INDONESIA dong.....
WKWKWKWK
https://youtu.be/8S-4L60WpLU?si=lGGBXZq5vu0qiMgn
BalasHapusPatroli Gabungan TNI-POLRI sekitar 2.000 Personel Aparat untuk menjamin Keamanan Nasional dan Rakyat Indonesia dalam berperikehidupan.
Itu link 1 jam lalu
Artinya:
Malondesh GAGAL TOTAL NEGATIVE FRAMING terhadap INDONESIA, right????
WKWKWKWK
ð§ 1. MAINTENANCE BURDEN: AGING ASSETS, FRAGMENTED SUPPORT
BalasHapus⚙️ Structural Drivers
• Asset Age: As of late 2024, 171 military platforms across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service life. This includes:
o 108 Army vehicles and artillery systems
o 29 RMAF aircraft (e.g., F-5E, Hawk 208)
o 34 RMN vessels, including Fast Attack Craft over 40 years old
• Obsolescence: Many platforms are no longer supported by OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), making spare parts scarce and costly.
ðļ Economic Strain
• Maintenance consumes over 50% of the defense budget’s operational expenditure (OPEX), leaving limited room for modernization.
• Even with recent efforts to localize MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul) for fighter jets like the F/A-18, cost savings (~20%) are offset by the scale of aging fleets.
ð§Đ Outsourcing Challenges
• Malondesh has long outsourced support functions to private firms to reduce costs.
• However, lack of centralized oversight, inconsistent quality control, and limited technical depth in local vendors have led to delays and suboptimal readiness.
ðĄ 2. Poor Interoperability: Platform Diversity, Command Silos
ð ️ Platform Fragmentation
• Malondesh military operates a highly diverse inventory sourced from:
o Western suppliers (US, UK, France)
o Eastern bloc (Russia, China)
o Regional partners (South Korea, Turkey)
• This results in incompatible communication systems, data links, and logistics chains. For example:
o Russian-made Su-30MKM fighters cannot seamlessly integrate with NATO-standard AWACS or datalink systems.
o Naval platforms lack unified combat management systems across classes.
ð§ Command & Control Gaps
• Joint operations are hindered by service-specific doctrines and siloed command structures.
• The absence of a Joint Operations Command with real-time data fusion limits Malondesh ability to conduct multi-domain operations.
𧊠Training & Simulation Deficiencies
• Lack of integrated simulation environments means personnel are trained on platform-specific systems, not joint mission profiles.
• Exercises like MALBATT and CARAT show progress, but interoperability remains tactical, not strategic.
ð Summary Table: Maintenance vs. Interoperability Weaknesses
Dimension Maintenance Burden Poor Interoperability
Root Cause Aging assets, fragmented procurement Diverse suppliers, siloed doctrines
Budgetary Impact High OPEX, low modernization headroom Redundant systems, inefficient upgrades
Operational Impact Low readiness, frequent downtime Limited joint ops, weak situational awareness
Reform Challenges Weak vendor oversight, slow MRO localization No unified C4ISR architecture
ð° 1. Budget Composition: Operational vs Development
BalasHapus• In 2025, Malondesh allocated RM21.2 billion to the Ministry of Defence.
o Operational Expenditure (OPEX): RM13.36 billion (~63%) — covers salaries, pensions, allowances, and day-to-day operations.
o Development Expenditure (DE): RM7.49 billion (~37%) — intended for asset acquisition, infrastructure, and modernization.
Impact: The bulk of funding goes to sustaining the status quo, not building future capabilities.
ðĨ 2. Personnel Costs Dominate Spending
• Salaries, pensions, and welfare programs for active-duty personnel and veterans consume over half of OPEX.
• Initiatives like RKAT housing repairs, pension adjustments, and cost-of-living allowances are important for morale but crowd out capital investment.
• Malondesh armed forces have a relatively large administrative footprint compared to its combat strength.
Impact: High fixed costs reduce flexibility for strategic procurement or force restructuring.
ð§ 3. Maintenance Over Modernization
• RM5.8 billion in 2025 was earmarked for maintenance, repair, and acquisition of military assets.
• However, most of this goes to keeping aging platforms operational, not acquiring new ones.
• Example: The Royal Malondeshn Navy spends heavily on maintaining ships that are 30–40 years old, with minimal upgrades.
Impact: Funds are spent on patching legacy systems rather than leapfrogging to modern technologies.
ð 4. Low R&D and Capability Investment
• Malondesh allocates negligible funding to defense R&D, indigenous production, or strategic systems (e.g. missiles, cyber, ISR).
• Unlike peers such as Indonesia or Vietnam, Malondesh has no major co-development programs or defense industrial offsets.
Impact: Malondesh remains dependent on foreign suppliers and lacks autonomy in capability planning.
ð Summary Table: Budget Allocation Weaknesses
Category Description Strategic Impact
Operational Expenditure RM13.36B for salaries, pensions, and operations Limits modernization and flexibility
Personnel Costs High welfare and admin spending Crowds out combat capability investment
Maintenance Focus RM5.8B for upkeep of aging assets Sustains outdated platforms
Low R&D Investment Minimal funding for innovation or strategic systems No indigenous capability development
ðĒ 1. Aging Fleet Beyond Serviceable Lifespan
BalasHapus• As of 2025, over half of RMN’s 49 ships are operating beyond their designed lifespan, some exceeding 40–45 years2.
• Example: The KD Pendekar, commissioned in 1979, sank in 2024 after colliding with an underwater object—experts cited wear and tear as a contributing factor.
• Naval experts warn that vessels typically have a 20–25 year lifespan, after which structural integrity and system reliability degrade significantly.
Impact: Increased risk of mechanical failure, reduced combat effectiveness, and safety hazards for personnel.
ð§ 2. Delayed Replacement and Procurement Failures
• Malondesh planned to acquire 18 new vessels, but only 4 have been delivered as of mid-2025.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, intended to modernize the fleet, has been plagued by delays, mismanagement, and corruption.
• The Auditor-General’s report revealed continued reliance on outdated ships due to non-delivery of replacements.
Impact: Strategic gaps in patrol coverage, reduced deterrence, and overreliance on aging platforms.
ð§ą 3. Obsolete Systems and Spare Part Incompatibility
• RMN has incurred RM384.5 million in losses from 1.62 million unused spare parts that are no longer compatible with its ships.
• Many vessels use legacy systems from diverse foreign suppliers (France, UK, Italy, Germany), making interoperability and maintenance complex.
Impact: High maintenance costs, long repair cycles, and logistical inefficiencies.
ð 4. Limited Deterrence and Strategic Reach
• Malondesh maritime domain spans over 500,000 sq km, yet its aging fleet lacks the endurance and sensor range to patrol effectively.
• Analysts warn that RMN’s current posture offers insufficient deterrence against rising threats, especially from China’s naval and coast guard presence.
Impact: Reduced strategic options for defense planners and vulnerability in contested waters.
ð Summary Table: Key Weaknesses of Malondeshn Navy Vessels
Weakness Description Strategic Impact
Aging platforms Over half the fleet >40 years old High failure risk, low combat value
Procurement delays Only 4 of 18 planned ships delivered Capability gaps, reduced patrol reach
Obsolete systems Legacy tech, incompatible spare parts Maintenance burden, poor interoperability
Limited deterrence Inadequate coverage of vast maritime domain Strategic vulnerability in South China Sea
ð§ 1. Obsolete Systems and Aging Platforms
BalasHapus• As of 2024, 171 military assets across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service.
• Many platforms—like the Royal Malondeshn Navy’s Fast Attack Craft (FAC) and older patrol vessels—are over 40 years old, far beyond their optimal lifespan.
• These systems were designed decades ago and now lack compatibility with modern sensors, weapons, and communications.
Impact: Upgrades are either impossible or prohibitively expensive, forcing reliance on outdated capabilities.
ð§ 2. Dependence on Foreign Spare Parts
• Malondesh military inventory is highly diversified, sourced from the US, UK, France, Russia, and others. This creates logistical complexity:
o Spare parts must be imported from multiple countries.
o Some OEMs have ceased production, making parts scarce or unavailable.
o Political or economic shifts can disrupt supply chains.
Example: The Army’s Condor APCs and Scorpion light tanks require parts from legacy suppliers that no longer support them.
Impact: Long lead times, inflated costs, and cannibalization of other units for parts.
ð 3. Frequent Breakdowns and Repair Cycles
• Older platforms experience higher failure rates, especially under tropical conditions and extended use.
• Maintenance crews often resort to patchwork fixes, which are temporary and unreliable.
• The Navy reported that 28 of its 34 aging vessels have exceeded 40 years of service, with many no longer meeting operational standards.
Impact: Reduced availability, increased downtime, and lower mission success rates.
ð 4. Budget Drain and Opportunity Cost
• Between 60–70% of Malondesh defense budget goes to salaries, maintenance, and operations, leaving little for modernization.
• Funds spent on keeping obsolete systems running could be redirected toward acquiring new platforms or investing in indigenous maintenance capabilities.
Impact: Strategic stagnation—Malondesh spends heavily but gains little in terms of capability.
ð Summary Table: Why Maintenance Costs Are So High
Factor Description Consequence
Obsolete systems Platforms >30–40 years old, incompatible with modern tech Expensive to maintain, low utility
Foreign parts dependency Diverse suppliers, legacy systems, political risk Long delays, inflated costs
Frequent breakdowns High failure rates, tropical wear, aging components Reduced readiness, more downtime
Budget imbalance Majority spent on upkeep, not modernization Strategic stagnation
https://youtu.be/8S-4L60WpLU?si=lGGBXZq5vu0qiMgn
BalasHapusPatroli Gabungan TNI-POLRI sekitar 2.000 Personel Aparat untuk menjamin Keamanan Nasional dan Rakyat Indonesia dalam berperikehidupan.
Itu link 1 jam lalu
Artinya:
Malondesh GAGAL TOTAL NEGATIVE FRAMING terhadap INDONESIA, right????
ð° 1. What Are Progressive Multi-Year Payments?
BalasHapusIn Malondesh defense procurement model:
• Large acquisitions (e.g. ships, aircraft, armored vehicles) are not paid for upfront.
• Instead, the government commits to multi-year installment payments, often spread across 5–10 years.
• Each annual defense budget allocates a portion to these ongoing payments, limiting funds available for new projects.
This structure is meant to ease fiscal pressure, but it creates long-term bottlenecks.
ð 2. How It Slows Platform Delivery
A. Cash Flow Constraints
• When most of the budget is tied up in legacy payments (e.g. for the Littoral Combat Ship or FA-50 jets), new programs are deferred.
• Even approved platforms face delayed production schedules due to inconsistent or partial payments to contractors.
B. Contractual Fragmentation
• OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) often require milestone-based payments to proceed with manufacturing.
• If Malondesh delays or underpays a milestone, production halts—leading to slippage in delivery timelines.
C. Budget Volatility
• Political transitions or economic downturns (e.g. COVID-19, ringgit depreciation) can cause annual budget cuts, disrupting payment schedules.
• This leads to renegotiations, cost overruns, and sometimes contract termination.
⚓ 3. Real-World Examples
Program Intended Delivery Status Cause of Delay
Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) First ship by 2019 None delivered as of 2025 Payment delays, mismanagement
FA-50 Light Fighters Initial batch by 2024 Slipped to 2026+ Budget phasing, contract finalization
AV8 Gempita IFVs Full fleet by 2020 Still incomplete Staggered payments, local production issues
ð 4. Systemic Impact
• Capability Gaps: Forces operate with aging platforms while waiting for replacements.
• Operational Risk: Delays in naval and air assets reduce deterrence and readiness.
• Loss of Credibility: OEMs and partners view Malondesh as a high-risk client, demanding stricter payment terms.
https://youtu.be/h5L5s7YT6es?si=0GF2VAieqU2qUQ5I
BalasHapusProvokator yang menjadi Supplier Material dan Logistik Aksi Anarkis pun ditangkap POLRI.
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right?
ð§ą 1. Aging and Inadequate Equipment
BalasHapus• Many of Malondesh military platforms—especially aircraft, naval vessels, and armored vehicles—are over 30 years old, with limited upgrades.
• This leads to frequent breakdowns, low availability rates, and high maintenance costs.
• For example, the Royal Malondeshn Air Force still operates MiG-29s and F-5s, which are outdated compared to regional counterparts.
ðļ 2. Budget Allocation Issues
• Malondesh spends around RM15–18 billion annually on defense, but 60–70% of that goes to salaries, pensions, and basic operations.
• This leaves little room for modernization, procurement of new systems, or advanced training.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, meant to boost naval capability, has been plagued by delays and mismanagement, with no ships delivered despite billions spent.
ð§ 3. Weak Logistics and Support Systems
• Malondesh lacks a robust Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) system, which is crucial for sustaining equipment over its lifecycle.
• Poor implementation of logistics planning leads to inefficient supply chains, delayed repairs, and low asset readiness.
• Without proper logistics, even well-equipped units struggle to maintain operational tempo.
ð§ 4. Training and Doctrine Gaps
• Military exercises are limited in scope and frequency, reducing the ability to simulate real combat scenarios.
• There’s insufficient emphasis on joint and combined operations, which are essential for modern warfare.
• Training doctrines are not fully aligned with emerging threats like cyber warfare, grey-zone conflict, and multi-domain operations.
ð§ 5. Human Resource Challenges
• Recruitment is uneven across ethnic groups, and there’s a shortage of personnel with skills in cybersecurity, AI, and electronic warfare.
• Retention is also a problem, especially for highly trained specialists who may leave for better-paying civilian roles.
ð§ 6. Strategic and Geopolitical Lag
• Malondesh defense posture has traditionally relied on non-provocative diplomacy, especially in the South China Sea.
• But with rising tensions and assertiveness from regional powers like China, this approach is increasingly seen as insufficient.
• Malondesh risks falling behind countries like Vietnam and the Philippines, which are rapidly modernizing and strengthening alliances.
ð Summary Table: Key Factors Reducing Operational Capability
Factor Impact on Military Readiness
Aging Equipment Low availability, high maintenance costs
Budget Imbalance Limited modernization and procurement
Weak Logistics Poor sustainment and asset reliability
Training Gaps Inadequate combat preparedness
HR Shortages Skills gap in modern warfare domains
Strategic Lag Vulnerability in regional power dynamics
Yaaa ampyunnn benda apa ituww Kecilnyaa haha!ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapuspantesan KABURRR di bully Kapal CCG melulu haha!ððð
https://youtu.be/lZ_7q4_A-Mo?si=gBb9fmd4gcGkQTN4
BalasHapusCara kerja Provokator yang menjadi Hub untuk Supply Material dan Logistik Aksi Anarkis pun sudah ditangkap POLRI.
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right???
WKWKWKWK
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DiPFJeqgy/
BalasHapusHELLFIRE MISSILE from Indonesian AH-64E APACHE GUARDIAN IN SUPER GARUDA SHIELD EXERCISE.
MANTAP
MANA MD-530 MALAYSEWA ðēðū PURR.. UPS GROUNDED YA
Aset ituw macam KSR X 33 donk
BalasHapusFULL RUDAL NSM nich haha!ððð
Pertamax seKawasan...warganyet seblah Kalah Laaggiiii haha!ðĨðĨðĨ
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
KSR X-33
https://youtube.com/watch?v=u_4RgkBKsx0
https://youtu.be/fJr4v9A2_cM?si=iNLrRDAUGJUg4kZI
BalasHapus3.195 pelaku Penjarah dan Perusuh Aksi Anarkis pun ditangkap POLRI
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right????
WKWKWKWK
Parah.... PENJARAHAN sudah masuk ke dalam mall guys... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusDEMO RICUH SAMPAI MASUK MALL 02 SEPTEMBER 2025 HARI INI
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OJi-R_yW4pY
What Are Malondesh Force Structure Limitations?
Hapus1. Small Active Force Size
• Malondesh has ~113,000 active personnel and ~51,600 reserves.
• Compared to regional peers like Indonesia (~400,000) and Vietnam (~600,000), Malondesh manpower is modest.
• This limits its ability to sustain multi-domain operations or respond to simultaneous threats across Peninsular and East Malondesh.
2. Fragmented Tri-Service Coordination
• The Malondeshn Army, Navy, and Air Force operate with limited joint doctrine and interoperability.
• There’s no unified Joint Operations Command, which hampers integrated responses in complex scenarios (e.g. amphibious landings, cyber warfare).
• Exercises like CARAT and Bersama Shield help, but internal coordination remains weak.
3. Lack of Force Projection Capability
• Malondesh lacks long-range strategic assets:
o No aircraft carriers, heavy bombers, or ballistic missile systems
o Limited aerial refueling and sealift capacity
• This restricts Malondesh ability to deploy forces beyond its borders or sustain operations in contested zones like the South China Sea.
4. Overreliance on Legacy Platforms
• Many platforms are aging or obsolete, such as:
o MiG-29s (retired), F/A-18Ds (limited numbers), and Scorpene submarines (aging)
• Procurement delays (e.g. Littoral Combat Ships) have stalled modernization
• New acquisitions like FA-50 jets and LMS Batch 2 are promising but not yet integrated into full operational doctrine
5. Budget Allocation Imbalance
• Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs
• Capital expenditure for modernization is squeezed, limiting upgrades and new systems
• Multi-year commitments (e.g. aircraft payments) crowd out fresh investments
6. Limited Indigenous Defence Industry
• Malondesh domestic defence production focuses on maintenance, small arms, and vehicles
• It lacks capacity for advanced systems like missiles, radar, or naval combatants
• This increases dependence on foreign suppliers and slows force structure evolution
ð Summary Table: Key Force Structure Gaps
Limitation Impact on Capability
Small active force Limited operational depth
Weak joint command Poor tri-service coordination
No strategic assets No regional power projection
Aging platforms Reduced combat readiness
Budget imbalance Slow modernization, procurement delays
Weak defence industry High import dependence, slow tech adoption
ð ️ What Does “Legacy Platforms” Mean?
HapusLegacy platforms refer to aging military equipment—aircraft, ships, vehicles, and systems—that are:
• Outdated in technology
• Costly to maintain
• Operationally limited in modern combat scenarios
Malondesh continues to operate many such platforms across its armed services.
ð Why Malondesh Overrelies on Legacy Platforms
1. Budget Constraints & Prioritization Gaps
• Defence spending has never been a top priority in Malondesh’s national budget.
• Most funds go to personnel costs, leaving little for capital upgrades.
• Modernization plans are often delayed or cancelled due to economic pressures.
2. Delayed Procurement Cycles
• Example: The MiG-29N jets, delivered in 1995, were supposed to retire by 2010. But due to budget issues, their service was extended indefinitely.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, meant to replace aging naval assets, has faced years of delay, leaving the Navy reliant on older patrol vessels.
3. Fragmented Modernization Strategy
• Malondesh lacks a cohesive long-term procurement roadmap.
• Acquisitions are often piecemeal, reactive, and politically driven.
• This leads to a mix of platforms from Russia, the U.S., France, and China, complicating logistics and interoperability.
4. Maintenance Burden
• Legacy systems require frequent repairs, spare parts, and specialized technicians.
• Example: Malondesh’s fleet includes C-130 Hercules from the 1970s and CN-235s from the early 2000s.
• These platforms consume budget without delivering modern capability.
5. Capability Gaps
• Malondesh’s Air Force can only cover one-third of its territory with current aircraft.
• The Navy lacks sufficient sealift, anti-submarine warfare, and maritime surveillance assets.
• The Army relies on older armored vehicles with limited protection and mobility.
ð Examples of Legacy Platforms Still in Use
Platform Service Branch Year Introduced Status
MiG-29N Fulcrum Air Force 1995 Retired (late)
F/A-18D Hornet Air Force 1997 Still active
C-130 Hercules Air Force 1970s–1990s Operational
Scorpene Submarines Navy 2009 Aging, limited fleet
Condor APCs Army 1980s Still in service
⚠️ Strategic Risks
• Reduced deterrence in the South China Sea
• Limited interoperability with allies
• High lifecycle costs without capability returns
• Vulnerability to modern threats like drones, cyber warfare, and precision strikes
BUBAR DIDEPAN MATA... MERDEKA.. MERDEKA..MERDEKA... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusMualem Sebut Aceh Kini Berkiblat ke Kuala Lumpur, Bukan Lagi ke Jakarta
https://www.infoaceh.net/aceh/mualem-sebut-aceh-kini-berkiblat-ke-kuala-lumpur-bukan-lagi-ke-jakarta/
Semenanjung bawahan ACEH
HapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
ð ️ What Does “Legacy Platforms” Mean?
HapusLegacy platforms refer to aging military equipment—aircraft, ships, vehicles, and systems—that are:
• Outdated in technology
• Costly to maintain
• Operationally limited in modern combat scenarios
Malondesh continues to operate many such platforms across its armed services.
ð Why Malondesh Overrelies on Legacy Platforms
1. Budget Constraints & Prioritization Gaps
• Defence spending has never been a top priority in Malondesh’s national budget.
• Most funds go to personnel costs, leaving little for capital upgrades.
• Modernization plans are often delayed or cancelled due to economic pressures.
2. Delayed Procurement Cycles
• Example: The MiG-29N jets, delivered in 1995, were supposed to retire by 2010. But due to budget issues, their service was extended indefinitely.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, meant to replace aging naval assets, has faced years of delay, leaving the Navy reliant on older patrol vessels.
3. Fragmented Modernization Strategy
• Malondesh lacks a cohesive long-term procurement roadmap.
• Acquisitions are often piecemeal, reactive, and politically driven.
• This leads to a mix of platforms from Russia, the U.S., France, and China, complicating logistics and interoperability.
4. Maintenance Burden
• Legacy systems require frequent repairs, spare parts, and specialized technicians.
• Example: Malondesh’s fleet includes C-130 Hercules from the 1970s and CN-235s from the early 2000s.
• These platforms consume budget without delivering modern capability.
5. Capability Gaps
• Malondesh’s Air Force can only cover one-third of its territory with current aircraft.
• The Navy lacks sufficient sealift, anti-submarine warfare, and maritime surveillance assets.
• The Army relies on older armored vehicles with limited protection and mobility.
ð Examples of Legacy Platforms Still in Use
Platform Service Branch Year Introduced Status
MiG-29N Fulcrum Air Force 1995 Retired (late)
F/A-18D Hornet Air Force 1997 Still active
C-130 Hercules Air Force 1970s–1990s Operational
Scorpene Submarines Navy 2009 Aging, limited fleet
Condor APCs Army 1980s Still in service
⚠️ Strategic Risks
• Reduced deterrence in the South China Sea
• Limited interoperability with allies
• High lifecycle costs without capability returns
• Vulnerability to modern threats like drones, cyber warfare, and precision strikes
ð Why Malondesh Deterrence Is Reduced
Hapus1. Limited Military Capabilities
• Malondesh lacks strategic assets like long-range missiles, stealth aircraft, or advanced naval platforms.
• Its air force has only 18 F/A-18Ds and is just beginning to induct FA-50 light fighters, which are not deterrent-grade.
• The Navy’s delayed Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program and aging submarines weaken maritime deterrence.
2. Fragmented Force Structure
• The armed forces operate in silos, with weak joint command and coordination.
• This reduces operational effectiveness in multi-domain scenarios like amphibious defense or cyber warfare.
3. Budget Constraints
• Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs, leaving little for modernization.
• Malondesh defence spending is ~1% of GDP, far below regional peers like Singapore (~4.9%).
4. Technological Gaps
• Malondesh defence tech lags behind in:
o Cyber warfare
o Electronic warfare
o Unmanned systems
• This limits its ability to counter modern threats like drones, grey-zone tactics, and hybrid warfare.
5. Geostrategic Vulnerabilities
• Malondesh sits near critical maritime chokepoints: the Strait of Malacca and South China Sea.
• Chinese Coast Guard incursions near Sarawak and airspace violations in 2021 exposed Malondesh inability to respond decisively.
6. Diplomatic Ambiguity
• Malondesh non-confrontational foreign policy avoids hard deterrence postures.
• While it promotes regional peace, this can be perceived as strategic passivity, reducing deterrence credibility.
ð Summary Table: Key Deterrence Weaknesses
Factor Impact on Deterrence
Limited strategic assets Weak denial and punishment capability
Budget imbalance Slow modernization, poor readiness
Tech lag Vulnerable to modern threats
Weak joint ops Ineffective multi-domain response
Passive diplomacy Low credibility in threat signaling
What Are Malondesh Force Structure Limitations?
BalasHapus1. Small Active Force Size
• Malondesh has ~113,000 active personnel and ~51,600 reserves.
• Compared to regional peers like Indonesia (~400,000) and Vietnam (~600,000), Malondesh manpower is modest.
• This limits its ability to sustain multi-domain operations or respond to simultaneous threats across Peninsular and East Malondesh.
2. Fragmented Tri-Service Coordination
• The Malondeshn Army, Navy, and Air Force operate with limited joint doctrine and interoperability.
• There’s no unified Joint Operations Command, which hampers integrated responses in complex scenarios (e.g. amphibious landings, cyber warfare).
• Exercises like CARAT and Bersama Shield help, but internal coordination remains weak.
3. Lack of Force Projection Capability
• Malondesh lacks long-range strategic assets:
o No aircraft carriers, heavy bombers, or ballistic missile systems
o Limited aerial refueling and sealift capacity
• This restricts Malondesh ability to deploy forces beyond its borders or sustain operations in contested zones like the South China Sea.
4. Overreliance on Legacy Platforms
• Many platforms are aging or obsolete, such as:
o MiG-29s (retired), F/A-18Ds (limited numbers), and Scorpene submarines (aging)
• Procurement delays (e.g. Littoral Combat Ships) have stalled modernization
• New acquisitions like FA-50 jets and LMS Batch 2 are promising but not yet integrated into full operational doctrine
5. Budget Allocation Imbalance
• Over 40% of the defence budget goes to personnel costs
• Capital expenditure for modernization is squeezed, limiting upgrades and new systems
• Multi-year commitments (e.g. aircraft payments) crowd out fresh investments
6. Limited Indigenous Defence Industry
• Malondesh domestic defence production focuses on maintenance, small arms, and vehicles
• It lacks capacity for advanced systems like missiles, radar, or naval combatants
• This increases dependence on foreign suppliers and slows force structure evolution
ð Summary Table: Key Force Structure Gaps
Limitation Impact on Capability
Small active force Limited operational depth
Weak joint command Poor tri-service coordination
No strategic assets No regional power projection
Aging platforms Reduced combat readiness
Budget imbalance Slow modernization, procurement delays
Weak defence industry High import dependence, slow tech adoption
NGERI UTANG MALON SANGAT MENGGUNUNG ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusSetiap penduduk MALON mempunyai UTANG rata2 RM 47.000
Setiap penduduk MALON dibebani UTANG KERAJAAN sekitar RM 37.000
NGERI ...
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Pada akhir kuartal pertama 2025 (Maret 2025), total utang rumah tangga Malaysia adalah RM 1,65 triliun atau setara 84,3% dari PDB, sedangkan utang pemerintah persekutuan mencapai RM 1,3 triliun pada akhir Juni 2025, naik dari RM 1,25 triliun pada akhir 2024. Utang pemerintah terhadap PDB diperkirakan akan mencapai 69% pada akhir 2025.
Malondesh’s Military Modernization Is Slow
BalasHapus1. Budget Allocation Imbalance
• Over 60–70% of the defence budget goes to salaries, pensions, and maintenance, leaving little for new systems or upgrades.
• Malondesh spends around RM15–18 billion annually, but most of it is used to “keep the lights on” rather than invest in future capabilities.
2. Procurement Delays & Scandals
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program—meant to modernize the Navy—has faced years of delay, cost overruns, and corruption investigations2.
• These setbacks have eroded public trust and stalled critical upgrades, leaving the Navy with outdated ships.
3. Fragmented Modernization Strategy
• Malondesh lacks a cohesive long-term defence roadmap.
• Procurement is often reactive, driven by political cycles rather than strategic planning.
• Result: a patchwork of platforms from Russia, the U.S., France, and China, complicating logistics and interoperability.
4. Weak Indigenous Defence Industry
• Malondesh’s domestic defence sector focuses on maintenance and basic manufacturing, not advanced systems.
• Outsourcing of maintenance since the 1970s was meant to build self-reliance, but it hasn’t scaled to meet modernization needs.
5. Currency Depreciation & Fiscal Constraints
• The weak ringgit reduces Malondesh’s purchasing power for foreign defence equipment.
• Declining oil revenues and economic pressures have shrunk the government’s coffers, limiting capital expenditure.
⚠️ Why Readiness Is Poor
1. Aging Equipment
• Many platforms are decades old, including:
o C-130 Hercules (1970s)
o Condor APCs (1980s)
o Scorpene submarines (2009)
• These systems require frequent maintenance and offer limited combat capability.
2. Limited Joint Operations Capability
• The Army, Navy, and Air Force operate with minimal integration.
• There’s no unified Joint Operations Command, reducing effectiveness in multi-domain missions.
3. Training & Doctrine Gaps
• Budget constraints affect training frequency, simulation systems, and doctrinal development.
• Malondesh lacks advanced cyber warfare, electronic warfare, and drone operations capabilities.
ð Summary Table: Key Factors
Challenge Impact on Modernization & Readiness
Budget imbalance Little funding for new systems
Procurement delays Missed timelines, capability gaps
Weak defence industry High import dependence
Currency depreciation Reduced purchasing power
Aging platforms High maintenance, low combat effectiveness
Poor joint ops integration Inefficient multi-service coordination
NGERI UTANG MALON SANGAT MENGGUNUNG ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusSetiap penduduk MALON mempunyai UTANG rata2 RM 47.000
Setiap penduduk MALON dibebani UTANG KERAJAAN sekitar RM 37.000
NGERI ...
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Pada akhir kuartal pertama 2025 (Maret 2025), total utang rumah tangga Malaysia adalah RM 1,65 triliun atau setara 84,3% dari PDB, sedangkan utang pemerintah persekutuan mencapai RM 1,3 triliun pada akhir Juni 2025, naik dari RM 1,25 triliun pada akhir 2024. Utang pemerintah terhadap PDB diperkirakan akan mencapai 69% pada akhir 2025.
HANYA MAMPU BELI BOT KECIL
HapusðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
https://youtu.be/uLZ6h7ipl44?si=bDJevlcWWNEY50m4
BalasHapusPatroli Skala Besar TNI Tanpa Batas Waktu di Jakarta.
Jakarta aman dan Kondusif untuk menjamin Keamanan Nasional dan Rakyat Indonesia dalam berperikehidupan
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right ????
WKWKWK
1. Procurement Mismanagement
BalasHapus• The project began in 2011, with a contract awarded to Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) to build 6 ships.
• By 2022, despite RM6.08 billion already spent, not a single ship had been delivered.
• Poor oversight and lack of accountability led to cost overruns and schedule slippage.
2. Design Changes Midway
• The original plan was to use the MEKO A-100 design from France.
• Midway, the Navy requested changes to combat systems and sensors, causing delays in integration and testing.
• These changes required re-certification and re-engineering, adding years to the timeline.
3. Supply Chain & OEM Issues
• Delays in receiving components from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) disrupted construction schedules.
• Some systems were not delivered on time, while others were incompatible with the revised ship design.
4. Financial Overruns
Metric Original Plan Current Status
Total Cost RM9 billion RM11.22 billion
Ships Ordered 6 5 (1 cancelled)
Completion Timeline 2019–2023 2026–2029
The cost ballooned by RM2.22 billion, forcing the government to scale down the number of ships.
5. Political & Institutional Delays
• Multiple changes in government between 2018–2022 led to policy uncertainty.
• Investigations by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) revealed serious lapses in governance.
• The project was temporarily frozen, then restarted under a restructured plan.
6. Impact on National Security
• Experts warn that the delay leaves Malondesh vulnerable in its maritime zones, especially in the South China Sea.
• The Navy lacks modern surface combatants to replace aging ships like the KD Kasturi and KD Lekir
NEGARA BUBAR DIDEPAN MATA... MERDEKA.. MERDEKA..MERDEKA... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusMualem Sebut Aceh Kini Berkiblat ke Kuala Lumpur, Bukan Lagi ke Jakarta
https://www.infoaceh.net/aceh/mualem-sebut-aceh-kini-berkiblat-ke-kuala-lumpur-bukan-lagi-ke-jakarta/
1. Overdependence on Foreign OEMs
Hapus• Malondesh relies heavily on international suppliers for critical components, systems, and platforms.
• This includes aircraft avionics, naval combat systems, and armored vehicle parts.
• Any delay or disruption from these OEMs—due to geopolitical tensions, export controls, or production backlogs—directly stalls Malondeshn projects.
2. Limited Local Manufacturing Capability
• Domestic defense firms mostly handle maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO), not full-scale production.
• Indigenous capabilities are focused on small arms, logistics vehicles, and basic electronics—not advanced systems like radar, missiles, or propulsion.
• This creates a dependency loop, where even minor upgrades require foreign input.
3. Fragmented Supply Chain Ecosystem
• Malondesh defense supply chain lacks integration and coordination between stakeholders.
• Poor visibility across upstream (OEMs) and downstream (end users) leads to inefficiencies.
• Absence of a centralized strategic procurement framework weakens resilience during crises or delays.
4. Custom Design & Integration Challenges
• Malondesh often requests custom configurations (e.g., in the LCS project), which complicates integration of foreign systems.
• OEMs must redesign or adapt components, leading to technical mismatches and longer lead times.
5. Lack of Economies of Scale
• Malondesh relatively small order volumes make it less attractive to global OEMs.
• This results in higher unit costs, longer delivery timelines, and lower priority in production queues.
6. Policy & Bureaucratic Delays
• Procurement processes are slow and opaque, with frequent changes in specifications and leadership.
• Delays in contract approvals, payment schedules, and regulatory compliance further disrupt supply timelines.
ð§ Example: LCS Project Impact
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program suffered from delayed component deliveries, incompatible systems, and OEM withdrawal, all linked to poor supply chain coordination2.
• Result: RM6 billion spent, zero ships delivered as of 2025.
1. Overdependence on Foreign OEMs
Hapus• Malondesh relies heavily on international suppliers for critical components, systems, and platforms.
• This includes aircraft avionics, naval combat systems, and armored vehicle parts.
• Any delay or disruption from these OEMs—due to geopolitical tensions, export controls, or production backlogs—directly stalls Malondeshn projects.
2. Limited Local Manufacturing Capability
• Domestic defense firms mostly handle maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO), not full-scale production.
• Indigenous capabilities are focused on small arms, logistics vehicles, and basic electronics—not advanced systems like radar, missiles, or propulsion.
• This creates a dependency loop, where even minor upgrades require foreign input.
3. Fragmented Supply Chain Ecosystem
• Malondesh defense supply chain lacks integration and coordination between stakeholders.
• Poor visibility across upstream (OEMs) and downstream (end users) leads to inefficiencies.
• Absence of a centralized strategic procurement framework weakens resilience during crises or delays.
4. Custom Design & Integration Challenges
• Malondesh often requests custom configurations (e.g., in the LCS project), which complicates integration of foreign systems.
• OEMs must redesign or adapt components, leading to technical mismatches and longer lead times.
5. Lack of Economies of Scale
• Malondesh relatively small order volumes make it less attractive to global OEMs.
• This results in higher unit costs, longer delivery timelines, and lower priority in production queues.
6. Policy & Bureaucratic Delays
• Procurement processes are slow and opaque, with frequent changes in specifications and leadership.
• Delays in contract approvals, payment schedules, and regulatory compliance further disrupt supply timelines.
ð§ Example: LCS Project Impact
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program suffered from delayed component deliveries, incompatible systems, and OEM withdrawal, all linked to poor supply chain coordination2.
• Result: RM6 billion spent, zero ships delivered as of 2025.
1. Limited Defense Budget Allocation
HapusMalondesh historically allocates a relatively modest portion of its national budget to defense. While exact figures vary yearly, defense spending generally hovers around 1.2%–1.5% of GDP, which is lower than many neighboring countries in Southeast Asia. This limited allocation constrains the military’s ability to fund:
• Procurement of advanced weapons systems
• Research and development (R&D)
• Infrastructure maintenance and upgrades
• Personnel training and welfare
________________________________________
2. High Operational Costs vs. Budget
Even with a modest defense budget, a significant portion goes toward salaries, pensions, and day-to-day operations, leaving limited funds for modernization programs. For instance:
• Military personnel costs (salaries, benefits, retirement pay) consume a large share of the budget.
• Routine operational expenses such as fuel, maintenance, and logistics reduce available funds for new equipment.
This means that Malondesh often faces trade-offs between maintaining existing forces and acquiring new capabilities.
________________________________________
3. Competition with Domestic Priorities
Malondesh faces multiple domestic financial priorities, including:
• Education and healthcare
• Infrastructure development
• Social welfare programs
These competing priorities make it politically and economically difficult to significantly increase defense spending, even when modernization is needed.
________________________________________
4. Dependency on Foreign Technology
Malondesh relies heavily on foreign suppliers for advanced military hardware, which is expensive. Limited financial resources make it challenging to:
• Procure large quantities of modern equipment
• Maintain sophisticated systems
• Engage in long-term defense research or develop indigenous capabilities
As a result, Malondesh often acquires second-hand equipment or delays procurement programs.
________________________________________
5. Impact on Modernization and Strategic Readiness
The financial constraints directly influence Malondesh’s military readiness:
• Aging Equipment: Existing platforms (ships, aircraft, and vehicles) are kept operational beyond their intended lifespan due to budget constraints.
• Delayed Modernization: Planned acquisitions, such as advanced fighter jets, naval vessels, or air defense systems, are often postponed.
• Limited Training and Exercises: Reduced funds for joint exercises, international cooperation, and troop training can affect operational effectiveness.
________________________________________
6. Political and Economic Uncertainties
Fluctuating oil revenues, global economic conditions, and political changes affect budget allocations. Defense funding is often reactive rather than strategic, meaning modernization projects may stall if economic growth slows or budget priorities shift.
________________________________________
Summary:
Financial limitations in Malondesh’s military are primarily caused by modest defense budget allocations, high operational costs, competing domestic priorities, reliance on costly foreign technology, and economic/political uncertainties. These factors collectively constrain modernization, maintenance, and strategic readiness, leaving the armed forces with aging equipment and delayed capability development.
1. Aging Fleet & Capability Gaps
BalasHapus• Many ships, like the KD Kasturi and KD Lekir, are over 30 years old, with limited combat capability.
• Malondesh lacks modern anti-submarine warfare (ASW) platforms and long-range missile systems, leaving gaps in deterrence.
• The fleet is not equipped to handle high-tempo operations or multi-domain threats.
2. LCS Procurement Scandal & Delays
• The RM11 billion Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program has been plagued by:
o Procurement mismanagement
o Political interference
o Technical delays
• As of 2025, only 72% progress has been made, with the first ship expected to begin sea trials in December 2025.
• This delay leaves Malondesh without modern surface combatants for coastal and EEZ defense.
3. Fragmented Fleet Structure
• RMN operates too many ship classes, complicating logistics, training, and maintenance.
• The 15-to-5 Transformation Plan aims to consolidate the fleet into five core classes, but implementation is slow.
• Fragmentation leads to supply chain inefficiencies and higher operational costs.
4. Budgetary Constraints
• Defense spending is insufficient to support rapid modernization.
• High personnel costs consume over 40% of the defense budget, leaving limited funds for procurement and upgrades.
• Malondesh’s navy modernization is often delayed or scaled down due to fiscal pressures.
5. Limited Maritime Surveillance & Deterrence
• Malondesh faces frequent incursions by foreign vessels, especially in the South China Sea.
• Lack of long-range radars, UAVs, and submarine detection systems weakens maritime domain awareness.
• The Navy is stretched thin across Peninsular and East Malondesh, with limited ability to respond quickly.
6. Geopolitical Pressure & Strategic Vulnerability
• Malondesh’s neutral foreign policy limits its access to strategic alliances like AUKUS or QUAD.
• Rising Chinese assertiveness and illegal fishing by Vietnamese vessels challenge Malondesh’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
• Without a credible naval deterrent, Malondesh risks losing strategic influence in regional waters.
ð§ Summary Table
Problem Area Impact on RMN
Aging Fleet Reduced combat readiness
LCS Delays No modern surface combatants
Fragmented Ship Classes Inefficient logistics & maintenance
Budget Constraints Slow modernization
Weak Maritime Surveillance Vulnerable EEZ & coastlines
Strategic Isolation Limited deterrence in South China Sea
1. Overview
BalasHapusMalondesh armed forces, Angkatan Tentera Malondesh (ATM), operate under limited budgets. Over the decades, this has led to prolonged use of older military equipment and delays in modernizing their forces. These challenges impact operational readiness, capabilities, and strategic deterrence.
________________________________________
2. Ageing Equipment
“Ageing equipment” refers to military hardware that has outlived its intended operational lifespan or requires extensive maintenance to remain functional.
Examples in Malondesh:
1. Air Force (TUDM / Tentera Udara Diraja Malondesh)
o MiG-29s and F-5E Tiger IIs: Some aircraft are over 30 years old.
o Maintenance costs increase with age, and spare parts become harder to source.
o Operational readiness is reduced; fewer aircraft are available for exercises or patrols.
2. Navy (TLDM / Tentera Laut Diraja Malondesh)
o Kasturi-class frigates and older Perdana-class patrol vessels are decades old.
o Ships need constant upkeep; older vessels have limited combat capabilities compared to modern ships.
3. Army (TDM / Tentera Darat Malondesh)
o Condor armored vehicles and old artillery systems are still in service.
o Modern threats like asymmetric warfare or rapid deployment require more advanced, mobile systems.
Consequences of Ageing Equipment
• Higher maintenance costs: More resources go into keeping old hardware operational.
• Reduced combat effectiveness: Outdated technology may be inferior to neighboring militaries’ systems.
• Operational limitations: Older platforms may be slower, less reliable, or incompatible with modern communication and weapon systems.
________________________________________
3. Delayed Modernization
“Delayed modernization” occurs when planned upgrades or new acquisitions are postponed, usually due to budget constraints, bureaucratic issues, or changing priorities.
Examples in Malondesh:
1. Air Force
o Replacement of aging fighters like MiG-29s and F-5E has been delayed.
o New acquisitions like the Su-30MKM and M346 trainers are fewer than initially planned.
2. Navy
o Plans for new frigates, submarines, and multi-role combat ships are often slow-moving or downscaled.
o Patrol vessels are prioritized over high-end warships due to cost constraints.
3. Army
o Modern armored vehicles and artillery acquisition programs face delays, affecting mobility and firepower.
o Emphasis is placed on upgrading existing equipment rather than full-scale replacement.
Causes of Delayed Modernization
• Limited defense budget: Malondesh allocates ~1.5–2% of GDP to defense. High-cost projects compete with other national priorities.
• Procurement bureaucracy: Complex procurement processes slow down acquisition.
• Foreign dependence: Reliance on imported equipment leads to delays in deliveries.
• Strategic threat assessment: Malondesh relatively low external threat level reduces urgency for rapid modernization.
________________________________________
4. Impacts
1. Operational Readiness
o Fewer active platforms are available due to maintenance of old systems.
2. Capability Gap
o Aging systems may lack advanced radar, missile systems, or networked command capabilities.
3. Regional Competitiveness
o Malondesh may lag behind neighbors like Singapore or Thailand in modern warfare technology.
4. Financial Burden
o Continuous repair and patching of old equipment may ultimately cost more than timely modernization.
________________________________________
5. Summary
• Ageing Equipment: Military platforms (aircraft, ships, vehicles) are decades old, expensive to maintain, and less effective.
• Delayed Modernization: New acquisitions or upgrades are postponed due to budget, bureaucracy, and strategic prioritization.
• Overall Effect: Malondesh maintains a capable but moderately modernized military, with limitations in high-end operations, regional power projection, and technological parity.
MALAYSIA sentiasa Menanti mu Acheh.... ððŧððŧðēðūðēðūðēðū
BalasHapusMualem Sebut Aceh Kini Berkiblat ke Kuala Lumpur, Bukan Lagi ke Jakarta
https://www.infoaceh.net/aceh/mualem-sebut-aceh-kini-berkiblat-ke-kuala-lumpur-bukan-lagi-ke-jakarta/
ð§ Strategic and Policy Challenges
Hapus• Lack of Clear Long-Term Vision: Malondesh’s defence budgeting process often lacks transparency and predictability, making it difficult for the armed forces to plan long-term procurement and modernization programs.
• Frequent Political Changes: Since 2018, Malondesh has seen multiple changes in government, which has disrupted continuity in defence planning and policy execution.
ð° Budgetary Constraints
• Limited Procurement Funding: Although the defence budget has increased to RM19.73 billion in 2024, over 40% is allocated to salaries and allowances, leaving relatively little for equipment upgrades and procurement.
• Currency Depreciation: Malondesh relies heavily on foreign defence suppliers. The weakening ringgit reduces purchasing power, making imported equipment more expensive.
⚙️ Operational and Equipment Issues
• Aging Equipment: Many platforms, such as the Condor Armoured Personnel Carriers, are outdated. Replacement plans are slow due to budget and bureaucratic hurdles.
• Dependence on Foreign OEMs: Domestic defence manufacturing is still heavily reliant on foreign original equipment manufacturers, limiting self-reliance.
𧊠Technological and Industrial Limitations
• Underdeveloped Defence Industry: Malondesh’s local defence industry lacks the capacity to produce advanced systems independently, which hampers modernization efforts.
• Low R&D Investment: There’s insufficient investment in defence science and technology, which affects innovation and indigenous capability development.
ðĪ Civil-Military Integration Issues
• Misunderstanding of HANRUH Concept: The “Comprehensive Defence” (HANRUH) strategy is often misinterpreted as a purely military doctrine, rather than a whole-of-nation approach involving civil sectors.
• Weak Civil-Military Collaboration: The fading spirit of civil-military synergy, once strong during the Malayan Emergency, has weakened over time.
1. Overview of Malondesh’s Military Budget
HapusMalondesh’s armed forces are collectively called Angkatan Tentera Malondesh (ATM), which includes:
• Tentera Darat (Army)
• Tentera Laut (Navy)
• Tentera Udara (Air Force)
The military budget comes from the national budget, which is approved annually by the government. Historically, Malondesh allocates around 1.5% to 2% of its GDP to defense, which is lower than regional neighbors like Singapore (~3% of GDP) or Thailand (~2.5% of GDP).
________________________________________
2. Reasons for Budgetary Constraints
Several factors contribute to limits on Malondesh’s military spending:
1. Economic Priorities
o Malondesh has competing priorities like infrastructure, healthcare, education, and social programs.
o Defense often has to share funding with these critical sectors, especially during economic slowdowns or crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Low GDP Proportion Allocation
o Defense spending is not a large share of GDP, meaning ATM must operate efficiently with limited resources.
3. Cost of Modernization
o Modern weapons systems (jets, naval ships, missile defense) are very expensive.
o Limited budgets often force Malondesh to prioritize maintenance over new acquisitions.
4. Debt and Fiscal Policy Constraints
o The government manages national debt levels and budget deficits, which restricts discretionary spending, including military upgrades.
5. Regional Security Assessment
o Malondesh generally faces lower direct military threats compared to neighbors like the Philippines or Singapore, so it may choose cost-effective defense rather than high-tech military expansion.
________________________________________
3. Impact of Budgetary Constraints
Budget limits have several practical effects on Malondesh’s armed forces:
1. Delayed Modernization
o Acquisition of advanced aircraft, naval ships, and weapon systems may be postponed or scaled down.
o Example: Procurement of new fighter jets or submarines can take decades from planning to delivery.
2. Maintenance Challenges
o Aging equipment sometimes cannot be replaced, leading to higher maintenance costs and operational limitations.
o Some aircraft or naval vessels may be grounded due to lack of spare parts or funding.
3. Operational Readiness
o Limited funds can affect training exercises, personnel numbers, and military readiness.
o The military may focus on territorial defense and counter-insurgency, rather than high-tech, long-range capabilities.
4. Dependence on Foreign Suppliers
o Malondesh often relies on imports of military hardware, which can be costly and subject to international politics.
________________________________________
4. Examples of Budget-Related Decisions
• Air Force: Delays in acquiring modern fighter jets due to high costs; focus on upgrading older MiG-29s and Sukhoi Su-30s.
• Navy: Limited new ship acquisitions; focus on patrol vessels for maritime security instead of expensive frigates.
• Army: Equipment modernization is gradual; focus on light arms, armored vehicles, and special forces rather than full mechanized upgrades.
________________________________________
5. Conclusion
Malondesh’s military faces budgetary constraints due to a combination of economic priorities, limited GDP allocation, modernization costs, and debt management. While ATM remains capable for regional defense and internal security, high-end modernization and rapid expansion are restricted, requiring strategic prioritization of resources.
⚙️ Aging Equipment Across All Branches
Hapus• Over 30 Years in Service: A total of 171 military assets have exceeded 30 years of service:
o Malondeshn Army: 108 units
o Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF): 29 units
o Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN): 34 units2
• Maintenance Burden: These aging platforms require more frequent and costly maintenance, often with diminishing returns in performance and reliability.
• Obsolete Technology: Many systems are technologically outdated, making them less effective in modern combat scenarios and harder to integrate with newer platforms.
ðĒ Naval Fleet Limitations
• RMN Vessels Past Lifespan: Of the 53 ships operated by the RMN, 34 have exceeded their intended service life, with 28 vessels over 40 years old2.
• Capability Gaps: These older ships lack modern sensors, weapons systems, and propulsion technologies, reducing Malondesh ability to patrol and secure its vast maritime zones.
• Urgent Replacement Needs: The Navy has highlighted the need to replace these vessels to maintain operational readiness and maritime security.
✈️ Procurement and Oversight Issues
• Middlemen and Inflated Costs: Defence procurement has been criticized for relying on intermediaries, often retired military officers, which can lead to inflated prices and questionable deals.
• “Flying Coffins” Controversy: Malondesh King recently ordered the cancellation of a deal involving 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, calling them “flying coffins” and condemning the use of outdated assets.
• Limited Open Competition: Only 20–30% of major defence contracts are awarded through open tenders, reducing transparency and value for money.
ð§ Operational Readiness Challenges
• Training vs. Technology Gap: Troops often train on platforms that are no longer representative of modern battlefield conditions, limiting their tactical preparedness.
• Interoperability Issues: Malondesh mix of Western, Russian, and local systems creates integration challenges, especially in joint operations or multinational exercises.
⚓ 1. Aging Fleet and Maintenance Burden
Hapus• Over 60% of RMN vessels are past their intended service life, with many exceeding 40 years of operation.
• Older ships like the KD Lekiu and KD Kasturi class corvettes require frequent maintenance, which drains resources and reduces operational availability.
• These aging platforms lack modern combat systems, sensors, and propulsion technologies, making them less effective in maritime security operations.
ð° 2. Budgetary Constraints
• Malondesh’s defence budget is modest compared to regional powers like Singapore or Indonesia. This limits the ability to procure new vessels or upgrade existing ones.
• The 15-to-5 Transformation Programme, aimed at streamlining the fleet from 15 classes to 5, has faced delays due to funding shortfalls and procurement bottlenecks.
ð ️ 3. Procurement and Project Delays
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal is a major setback: six ships were ordered, but none have been delivered as of 2025 due to mismanagement and cost overruns.
• This delay has left a critical gap in Malondesh’s ability to patrol its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and respond to maritime threats.
ð 4. Strategic Maritime Challenges
• Malondesh has 4,700 km of coastline and is a claimant in the South China Sea dispute, requiring a robust naval presence.
• The current fleet lacks sufficient blue-water capability to project power or maintain sustained operations in contested waters.
ð 5. Limited Indigenous Shipbuilding Capability
• While Malondesh has domestic shipbuilders like Boustead Naval Shipyard, they still rely heavily on foreign technology and expertise, which slows down production and increases costs.
• The lack of a mature defence industrial base means Malondesh cannot quickly replace or upgrade its fleet without external support.
ð§ 6. Policy and Planning Gaps
• The Royal Malondeshn Navy’s previous strategies were based on outdated frameworks like the Maritime Defence Strategy (2009) and National Defence Policy (2010).
• Although the Defence White Paper (2020) and National Military Strategy 2.0 (2022) introduced new concepts like Concentric Deterrence, implementation has been slow.
ð§ Strategic and Policy Challenges
BalasHapus• Lack of Clear Long-Term Vision: Malondesh’s defence budgeting process often lacks transparency and predictability, making it difficult for the armed forces to plan long-term procurement and modernization programs.
• Frequent Political Changes: Since 2018, Malondesh has seen multiple changes in government, which has disrupted continuity in defence planning and policy execution.
ð° Budgetary Constraints
• Limited Procurement Funding: Although the defence budget has increased to RM19.73 billion in 2024, over 40% is allocated to salaries and allowances, leaving relatively little for equipment upgrades and procurement.
• Currency Depreciation: Malondesh relies heavily on foreign defence suppliers. The weakening ringgit reduces purchasing power, making imported equipment more expensive.
⚙️ Operational and Equipment Issues
• Aging Equipment: Many platforms, such as the Condor Armoured Personnel Carriers, are outdated. Replacement plans are slow due to budget and bureaucratic hurdles.
• Dependence on Foreign OEMs: Domestic defence manufacturing is still heavily reliant on foreign original equipment manufacturers, limiting self-reliance.
𧊠Technological and Industrial Limitations
• Underdeveloped Defence Industry: Malondesh’s local defence industry lacks the capacity to produce advanced systems independently, which hampers modernization efforts.
• Low R&D Investment: There’s insufficient investment in defence science and technology, which affects innovation and indigenous capability development.
ðĪ Civil-Military Integration Issues
• Misunderstanding of HANRUH Concept: The “Comprehensive Defence” (HANRUH) strategy is often misinterpreted as a purely military doctrine, rather than a whole-of-nation approach involving civil sectors.
• Weak Civil-Military Collaboration: The fading spirit of civil-military synergy, once strong during the Malayan Emergency, has weakened over time.
1. Major Examples
BalasHapusa. Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Project
• Budget: Initially RM9 billion for 6 ships.
• Actual Spending: Over RM11 billion and only partial completion (first ship expected in 2026).
• Reasons:
o Poor project planning.
o Technical challenges and redesigns.
o Use of shell companies and opaque contracts.
• Impact: Reduced naval capability and wasted taxpayer money.
b. New Generation Patrol Vessel (NGPV) Program
• Initial Budget: RM5.35 billion for 27 vessels.
• Final Cost: RM6.75 billion for only a portion of the ships.
• Causes: Delays, quality issues, and mismanagement.
c. ScorpÃĻne Submarine Procurement
• Original Cost: RM4.3 billion for 2 submarines.
• Overrun Factors: Bribery allegations, use of intermediaries, and additional unforeseen costs in logistics and training.
d. Light Helicopters & MD530G
• Contracts were canceled after payment, or delivery failures caused financial losses.
• Resulted in extra spending for replacements or alternative solutions.
________________________________________
2. Causes of Cost Overruns
1. Poor Planning & Project Management
o Unrealistic timelines.
o Underestimation of technical and operational complexities.
2. Political Interference
o Decisions often influenced by political connections rather than operational requirements.
o Preference for certain contractors can inflate costs.
3. Corruption & Cronyism
o Inflated contract values due to intermediaries or bribes.
o Shell companies and indirect payments increase total expenditure.
4. Technological & Operational Challenges
o Acquisition of outdated or incompatible equipment requires modifications.
o Training and infrastructure costs escalate unexpectedly.
5. Weak Oversight & Transparency
o Limited parliamentary supervision.
o Use of Official Secrets Act to hide financial irregularities.
________________________________________
3. Consequences
• Operational Impact: Delays in delivery reduce combat readiness.
• Financial Loss: Taxpayer money is wasted, limiting funds for other essential projects.
• Public Trust Erosion: Perception of mismanagement and corruption undermines confidence in the military and government.
• Long-term Strategic Weakness: Dependence on foreign suppliers increases vulnerability.
________________________________________
4. Conclusion
Cost overruns in Malondesh military procurement are systemic, caused by a mix of poor planning, political interference, corruption, and lack of transparency.
They reduce operational effectiveness, inflate defense spending, and erode public trust.
Boat? ðððĪĢðĪŠðð§ðĐð
BalasHapusJom Acheh.....
BalasHapusMualem Sebut Aceh Kini Berkiblat ke Kuala Lumpur, Bukan Lagi ke Jakarta
https://www.infoaceh.net/aceh/mualem-sebut-aceh-kini-berkiblat-ke-kuala-lumpur-bukan-lagi-ke-jakarta/
PERPECAHAN DARI DALAM GUYS.... ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusð§ū 1. Role of Middlemen and Retired Officers
Hapus• Defence procurement in Malondesh is often conducted through intermediaries, many of whom are retired military officers or politically connected individuals.
• These middlemen act as “agents” or “salesmen,” influencing contract awards and inflating prices.
• In a rare public rebuke, Malondesh King Sultan Ibrahim condemned this practice in 2025, calling out the Defence Ministry for relying on agents and ordering the cancellation of a deal involving 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which he referred to as “flying coffins”.
ð️ 2. Politically Connected Firms Favoured
• According to research by Transparency International, only 20–30% of defence contracts are awarded through open competition.
• The rest are handled via single-source or limited tenders, often favoring firms with political ties or ex-military board members.
• This environment allows agents to exert significant influence over deal structuring, sidelining merit-based selection.
ðļ 3. Scorpene Submarine Scandal
• One of the most infamous cases involved the purchase of French-made Scorpene submarines, which was mired in allegations of kickbacks and corruption.
• French investigators indicted several individuals and companies in 2018, highlighting the risks of compromised secrecy and foreign contractor influence3.
⚠️ 4. Weak Oversight and Accountability
• Malondesh lacks a robust oversight system to monitor defence procurement.
• Unlike countries like the U.S. or Singapore, Malondesh does not have multi-agency checks or parliamentary committees dedicated to defence contract scrutiny.
• This gap allows conflicts of interest to persist with minimal consequences.
ð 5. Impact on Military Readiness
• Inflated costs and mismanaged contracts result in delayed deliveries, substandard equipment, and budget overruns.
• This directly affects the Malondeshn Armed Forces’ ability to modernize and maintain operational readiness.
ð§ 6. Balancing Transparency and Secrecy
• While secrecy is necessary to protect national security, excessive opacity can hide corruption and conflicts of interest.
• Experts argue Malondesh must adopt best practices from other countries—such as transparent budgeting, competitive bidding, and independent audits—to restore trust and efficiency
1. Procurement and Equipment Weaknesses
Hapusa. Delays in Procurement
• Projects like the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) and New Generation Patrol Vessel (NGPV) programs have faced years of delays.
• LCS project, valued at RM9 billion, has seen zero completed ships after massive spending.
• Delays reduce operational readiness and compromise the Navy’s ability to safeguard maritime borders.
b. Cost Overruns
• Mismanagement and overbudgeting are common; e.g., the LCS project has overspent by over RM1.4 billion, partly to cover liabilities from past failed projects.
• Cost overruns often stem from political interference, corruption, and poor project planning.
c. Aging and Inadequate Equipment
• Acquisition of decades-old Black Hawk helicopters drew royal criticism as "flying coffins."
• Many MAF systems are obsolete, reducing combat effectiveness and increasing maintenance costs.
________________________________________
2. Corruption and Cronyism
• High-level officials and intermediaries often profit from military contracts (e.g., ScorpÃĻne submarine scandal).
• Cronyism results in:
o Contracts awarded without transparent tenders.
o Selection of unsuitable or overpriced equipment.
• This erodes public trust and inflates defense expenditure without improving capability.
________________________________________
3. Lack of Transparency and Oversight
• Official Secrets Act 1972 and limited parliamentary oversight create opaque decision-making.
• Tender processes often bypass public scrutiny, enabling mismanagement and corruption.
• Examples:
o LCS project: partial shell companies used for siphoning funds.
o ScorpÃĻne deal: commissions and possible bribery unaccounted for in official records.
________________________________________
4. Human Resource and Training Challenges
• Insufficient training and outdated doctrines reduce operational efficiency.
• MAF faces difficulty retaining skilled personnel in technical fields (e.g., naval engineering, aviation maintenance).
• Limited joint exercises with advanced foreign militaries reduce interoperability and experience.
________________________________________
5. Strategic and Policy Weaknesses
• Defence policy is sometimes reactive rather than proactive.
• Limited domestic defense production capability leads to dependence on foreign suppliers, often exacerbating delays and cost overruns.
• Politically driven procurement decisions may override strategic military needs.
________________________________________
Conclusion
The weaknesses of the Malondeshn Armed Forces are interconnected, combining operational, financial, and governance shortcomings:
1. Operational Readiness: Compromised by outdated and delayed equipment.
2. Financial Mismanagement: Overspending and corruption reduce the value of defense budgets.
3. Governance and Transparency Gaps: Lack of accountability allows systemic inefficiency.
4. Human Capital Challenges: Training and retention issues impede force modernization.
Implications:
• National security is at risk, particularly in maritime defense and rapid-response operations.
• Public funds are wasted without meaningful improvements in capability.
✈️ 1. Lack of Strategic Continuity
Hapus• The MRCA program was first proposed in the early 2000s to replace aging MiG-29s and F-5E fighters.
• Over two decades later, no final decision has been made, despite multiple rounds of evaluations and shifting priorities.
• Successive governments have repeatedly postponed the acquisition due to budget constraints, political changes, and lack of consensus.
ð§Đ 2. Fragmented Decision-Making
• Procurement decisions are split between the Ministry of Defence (Mindef) and the Ministry of Finance (MOF), with contracts over RM7 million requiring MOF approval.
• This dual-agency structure often leads to delays, conflicting priorities, and bureaucratic gridlock.
• The absence of a unified procurement authority results in inconsistent evaluations and shifting technical requirements.
ðž 3. Opaque Tendering Process
• Malondesh’s defence procurement is dominated by limited or single-source tenders, with only 20–30% of contracts awarded through open competition.
• This environment favors politically connected firms, often involving retired military officers as intermediaries.
• The MRCA program has seen multiple contenders—including the Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, Saab Gripen, and F/A-18—but no transparent selection process has been finalized.
ðļ 4. Budgetary Uncertainty
• The MRCA program has been repeatedly shelved due to budget reallocations and economic pressures.
• Malondesh’s defence budget prioritizes personnel and maintenance, leaving limited room for capital-intensive acquisitions like fighter jets.
• The lack of a multi-year procurement plan makes it difficult to commit to long-term investments.
ð 5. Changing Operational Requirements
• The Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF) has shifted its focus toward light combat aircraft (LCA) like the FA-50, due to cost-effectiveness and regional needs.
• This pivot reflects a reactive procurement strategy, rather than a proactive, capability-driven approach.
ð§ 6. Impact on Readiness
• The delay in MRCA acquisition has left Malondesh with a limited fighter fleet, relying heavily on aging F/A-18Ds and Su-30MKMs.
• This affects Malondesh’s ability to conduct air superiority missions, joint exercises, and regional deterrence.
Polres Jakarta Timur Diamuk Massa, Rusak Parah! I Liputan6
BalasHapushttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JldXEsBP8FE
ð§ū 1. Role of Middlemen and Retired Officers
Hapus• Defence procurement in Malondesh is often conducted through intermediaries, many of whom are retired military officers or politically connected individuals.
• These middlemen act as “agents” or “salesmen,” influencing contract awards and inflating prices.
• In a rare public rebuke, Malondesh King Sultan Ibrahim condemned this practice in 2025, calling out the Defence Ministry for relying on agents and ordering the cancellation of a deal involving 30-year-old Black Hawk helicopters, which he referred to as “flying coffins”.
ð️ 2. Politically Connected Firms Favoured
• According to research by Transparency International, only 20–30% of defence contracts are awarded through open competition.
• The rest are handled via single-source or limited tenders, often favoring firms with political ties or ex-military board members.
• This environment allows agents to exert significant influence over deal structuring, sidelining merit-based selection.
ðļ 3. Scorpene Submarine Scandal
• One of the most infamous cases involved the purchase of French-made Scorpene submarines, which was mired in allegations of kickbacks and corruption.
• French investigators indicted several individuals and companies in 2018, highlighting the risks of compromised secrecy and foreign contractor influence3.
⚠️ 4. Weak Oversight and Accountability
• Malondesh lacks a robust oversight system to monitor defence procurement.
• Unlike countries like the U.S. or Singapore, Malondesh does not have multi-agency checks or parliamentary committees dedicated to defence contract scrutiny.
• This gap allows conflicts of interest to persist with minimal consequences.
ð 5. Impact on Military Readiness
• Inflated costs and mismanaged contracts result in delayed deliveries, substandard equipment, and budget overruns.
• This directly affects the Malondeshn Armed Forces’ ability to modernize and maintain operational readiness.
ð§ 6. Balancing Transparency and Secrecy
• While secrecy is necessary to protect national security, excessive opacity can hide corruption and conflicts of interest.
• Experts argue Malondesh must adopt best practices from other countries—such as transparent budgeting, competitive bidding, and independent audits—to restore trust and efficiency
ð§Ļ 1. Long-Delayed Procurement Timeline
Hapus• The SPH program was first proposed in 2010, but has faced repeated delays and cancellations.
• As of 2024, the Malondeshn Army expressed renewed interest in acquiring 66 units of 155mm/52 calibre SPHs, but the program remains in limbo.
ðļ 2. Opaque Tendering and Political Controversy
• The procurement, valued at RM819.09 million, went through a selected pre-qualification tender involving six bidders.
• In 2022, allegations surfaced that the contract had been awarded directly to a company linked to a former deputy defence minister’s family, raising concerns about conflict of interest and cronyism.
• The Ministry of Finance approved the tender in January 2024, but required renegotiation of the price before finalization.
ð 3. Government-to-Government (G2G) Confusion
• Initially, Malondesh planned to acquire the Yavuz 155mm SPH from TÞrkiye’s state-owned MKE via a G2G deal.
• However, the deal was later reviewed and renegotiated, with the Defence Minister emphasizing the need for open tendering to ensure the equipment meets end-user specifications.
• This flip-flop between direct negotiation and open tendering reflects fragmented procurement strategy and lack of institutional clarity.
ð§Đ 4. Dual Oversight and Bureaucratic Gridlock
• Defence procurement in Malondesh is overseen by both Mindef and the Ministry of Finance, creating a dual-layered approval process that often leads to delays and misalignment.
• The lack of a centralized procurement authority results in conflicting decisions, as seen in the SPH case where Mindef had to renegotiate a deal already approved by MOF.
ð§ 5. Impact on Operational Capability
• Malondesh’s artillery units currently rely on towed howitzers, which are slower to deploy and less survivable in modern combat.
• The delay in acquiring SPHs hampers the Army’s ability to conduct rapid fire support missions, especially in mobile and contested environments.
ð§ū 1. Cronyism in Defence Contracts
Hapus• Defence contracts are frequently awarded to companies with political connections or ties to retired military officers, rather than based on merit or technical capability.
• Analysts have pointed out that unqualified firms often win major tenders, resulting in poor execution and missed deadlines.
• For example, the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project—initially a RM9 billion contract—was plagued by mismanagement. Despite over RM6 billion being paid, none of the six ships were delivered on time.
⚠️ 2. Conflict of Interest in Procurement
• In some cases, contracts have been awarded to companies linked to former defence officials or their families, raising serious questions about impartiality.
• The Self-Propelled Howitzer (SPH) deal faced scrutiny when it was revealed that a company involved had ties to a former deputy defence minister’s family. This prompted public backlash and calls for renegotiation.
ðļ 3. Financial Mismanagement and Delays
• Crony-linked firms often lack the technical expertise or financial stability to manage complex defence projects.
• This leads to:
o Delayed deliveries (e.g., offshore patrol vessels handed over three years late)
o Cost overruns (LCS project now revised to over RM11 billion)
o Unaccounted spending with little transparency or oversight
ð§ 4. Weak Enforcement and Accountability
• Experts have questioned the government’s willingness to pursue legal action against companies that fail to deliver.
• There’s concern that lawsuits could expose deeper corruption within the procurement system, making authorities hesitant to act.
ð 5. Impact on Military Readiness
• These practices directly affect the Malondeshn Armed Forces’ ability to modernize and maintain operational readiness.
• Delays in acquiring critical assets—like helicopters, ships, and artillery—leave the military under-equipped and vulnerable in key strategic areas.
Apakah Foto diatas?
BalasHapusItu BOA KECIL Pancing ikan Tongkol dan Cumi-cumi Malondesh kah?
Ya ampuuun.... sangat Tertinggal Malondesh
https://youtu.be/7MUnPeCPndA?si=hLpmYluOTGa4UUhp
BalasHapus1.240 Perusuh ditangkap POLRI
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right???
WKWKWKWK
https://youtu.be/7MUnPeCPndA?si=hLpmYluOTGa4UUhp
BalasHapus1.240 Perusuh ditangkap POLRI
Kenapa Malondesh sibuk Negative Framing terhadap INDONESIA, right???
WKWKWKWK
Apakah Foto diatas?
BalasHapusItu BOAT KECIL Pancing ikan Tongkol dan Cumi-cumi Malondesh kah?
Ya ampuuun.... sangat Tertinggal Malondesh
eittt tetap HadeerrrrðĶū
BalasHapusmao SHOPPING JITEN hore haha!ðĪðĨģðĪ
eitttt warganyet NGAMUKðĨDONK..biar langsung bungkus pulang nich haha!ððð
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://youtube.com/watch?v=rylhIIz14ig
warganyet kl makin gelisah, Jiten disegerakan hore haha!ðĪðĨģðĪ
BalasHapus⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://youtube.com/watch?v=rylhIIz14ig
Ppssst....PL15 vs LCA oom..?
HapusððĪ
wulink pasti menang om haha!ððĶūð
Hapus01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
Ketika menjadi NYATA RILIS PROCUREMENT dan DELIVERY J-10-C BRAND NEW PREMIUM QUALITY Made in CHINA 42 unit di Indonesia....
BalasHapusNetizen Indonesia bersyukur atas Procurement tersebut.
Namun Malondesh akan TANTRUM KEPANASAN sambil Loncat Loncat kesana kemari karena Tidak Terima INDONESIA segera menerima batch-1 J-10-C di 2026
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
https://www.youtube.com/live/DKzy-TjvPgM?si=bc0GMDY8YhlW3T4u
BalasHapusLink sore ini
Patroli Gabungan TNI-POLRI skala besar menjadikan:
Jakarta aman dan Kondusif
Malondesh GAGAL TOTAL NEGATIVE FRAMING terhadap INDONESIA, right ????
INI PERAHU UNTUK PANCING IKAN DI TASIK ...KEH ?
BalasHapusð§ 1. MAINTENANCE BURDEN: AGING ASSETS, FRAGMENTED SUPPORT
BalasHapus⚙️ Structural Drivers
• Asset Age: As of late 2024, 171 military platforms across the Army, Navy, and Air Force have exceeded 30 years of service life. This includes:
o 108 Army vehicles and artillery systems
o 29 RMAF aircraft (e.g., F-5E, Hawk 208)
o 34 RMN vessels, including Fast Attack Craft over 40 years old
• Obsolescence: Many platforms are no longer supported by OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), making spare parts scarce and costly.
ðļ Economic Strain
• Maintenance consumes over 50% of the defense budget’s operational expenditure (OPEX), leaving limited room for modernization.
• Even with recent efforts to localize MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul) for fighter jets like the F/A-18, cost savings (~20%) are offset by the scale of aging fleets.
ð§Đ Outsourcing Challenges
• Malondesh has long outsourced support functions to private firms to reduce costs.
• However, lack of centralized oversight, inconsistent quality control, and limited technical depth in local vendors have led to delays and suboptimal readiness.
ðĄ 2. Poor Interoperability: Platform Diversity, Command Silos
ð ️ Platform Fragmentation
• Malondesh military operates a highly diverse inventory sourced from:
o Western suppliers (US, UK, France)
o Eastern bloc (Russia, China)
o Regional partners (South Korea, Turkey)
• This results in incompatible communication systems, data links, and logistics chains. For example:
o Russian-made Su-30MKM fighters cannot seamlessly integrate with NATO-standard AWACS or datalink systems.
o Naval platforms lack unified combat management systems across classes.
ð§ Command & Control Gaps
• Joint operations are hindered by service-specific doctrines and siloed command structures.
• The absence of a Joint Operations Command with real-time data fusion limits Malondesh ability to conduct multi-domain operations.
𧊠Training & Simulation Deficiencies
• Lack of integrated simulation environments means personnel are trained on platform-specific systems, not joint mission profiles.
• Exercises like MALBATT and CARAT show progress, but interoperability remains tactical, not strategic.
ð Summary Table: Maintenance vs. Interoperability Weaknesses
Dimension Maintenance Burden Poor Interoperability
Root Cause Aging assets, fragmented procurement Diverse suppliers, siloed doctrines
Budgetary Impact High OPEX, low modernization headroom Redundant systems, inefficient upgrades
Operational Impact Low readiness, frequent downtime Limited joint ops, weak situational awareness
Reform Challenges Weak vendor oversight, slow MRO localization No unified C4ISR architecture
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong