09 September 2025
Pesawat tempur F/A-18C/D Legacy Hornet Kuwait (photo: MilitaerAktuell)
JOHOR BAHRU: Malaysia akan mempertimbangkan pilihan lain bagi memenuhi keperluan pertahanan udara negara susulan kelewatan penghantaran pesawat pejuang F/A-18 Legacy Hornet dari Kuwait, kata Menteri Pertahanan Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin.
Beliau berkata perkara itu timbul susulan ketidaktentuan mengenai penerimaan pesawat baharu oleh Kuwait daripada Amerika Syarikat, sekali gus menyebabkan penyerahan pesawat kepada Malaysia masih tertangguh.
"Saya difahamkan bahawa penghantaran jet-jet baharu Kuwait daripada Amerika telah ditangguhkan lagi. Justeru, kita tidak boleh menunggu tanpa kepastian kerana Kuwait hanya boleh menyerahkan F/A-18 itu selepas mereka menerima pesawat baharu.
"Kalau mereka tidak dapat, maka mereka tidak boleh serah kepada kita. Jadi di sinilah timbul masalah berapa lama kita boleh tunggu untuk memenuhi keperluan kita," katanya kepada pemberita selepas menghadiri Program Penyampaian Sumbangan Zakat Wakalah BHPetrol di Dewan Muafakat Taman Air Biru, di sini hari ini.
Beliau berkata justeru, pihaknya kini sedang meneliti pilihan lain agar Malaysia tidak berada dalam kedudukan yang merugikan, termasuk menilai pesawat yang tersedia di pasaran.
"Kalau kita tunggu sahaja, kita tidak akan buat apa-apa untuk pertimbangkan benda lain. Jadi di sinilah kita fikirkan kita perlu ada pilihan lain supaya kita tidak berada dalam keadaan yang tidak berpihak kepada kita," katanya.
Pada 26 Ogos, Panglima Tentera Udara Diraja Malaysia (TUDM) Jeneral Datuk Seri Muhammad Norazlan Aris dilaporkan berkata pihaknya sedang meneliti setiap aspek, sebelum membuat keputusan muktamad rancangan pembelian jet pejuang F/A-18 Hornet terpakai dari Kuwait.
Beliau turut menolak dakwaan bahawa perjanjian itu telah dibatalkan, sambil menegaskan bahawa semua pertimbangan masih dalam proses penilaian ketika ini.
Sementara itu, Mohamed Khaled yang juga Ahli Parlimen Kota Tinggi berkata, pembelian 18 jet pejuang FA-50 daripada Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) yang bakal diterima pada 2027 dijangka akan menampung keperluan pengoperasian TUDM.
"Selain itu, kita juga akan melihat kemampuan jet pejuang Sukhoi MKM yang dimiliki ketika ini, sama ada ia mencukupi untuk keperluan pertahanan negara.
"Kajian terperinci perlu dibuat kerana bermula 2027, semua pesawat tempur ringan, Hawk 108 dan Hawk 208, akan ditamatkan perkhidmatan secara berfasa," katanya.
(Bernama)
The Malondeshn military, also known as the Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), faces several significant challenges, which can be categorized into three main areas: procurement and modernization, human resources, and defense policy.
BalasHapusProcurement and Modernization ð°
A primary issue for the MAF is its aging and obsolete equipment. The country's defense spending has historically been low, and while recent budgets have seen increases, they are often insufficient to cover the extensive modernization needs.
• Financial Constraints: The 1997 Asian financial crisis had a lasting impact, forcing a de-prioritization of defense spending. Despite recent budget increases, competing priorities like healthcare and education often limit the funds available for military upgrades.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Past procurement projects, such as the Littoral Combat Ship program, have been plagued by delays, cost overruns, and allegations of corruption, which have wasted funds and resulted in a lack of operational assets.
• Aging Inventory: The MAF relies on a mix of equipment from various countries, making maintenance difficult. For example, the Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF) has struggled to maintain its Russian-made Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets due to sanctions and a lack of spare parts. The country also retired its MiG-29s without a timely replacement, creating a significant capability gap.
Human Resources ð§
Recruitment and personnel issues are another major problem for the MAF, affecting its overall readiness and capability.
• Recruitment Challenges: The military has difficulty attracting and retaining high-quality personnel. This is partly due to low wages and poor living conditions. The quality of candidates has been a concern, with a declining pool of eligible recruits.
• Ethnic Imbalance: There is a significant ethnic disparity in the armed forces, with a very low percentage of non-Malay recruits. This could affect national unity and the military's ability to represent the country's diverse population.
• Personnel Well-being: There are ongoing concerns about the well-being and welfare of military personnel, including work-life balance issues and the need for better mental health support.
Defense Policy and Strategic Challenges ðš️
The MAF operates in a complex regional environment with evolving security threats.
• South China Sea Disputes: Malondesh has overlapping territorial claims with China in the South China Sea. China's increasingly aggressive "grey-zone" tactics—using coast guard vessels and fishing militia to assert its claims—are a major challenge that the MAF is not fully equipped to handle.
• Non-Traditional Threats: While traditionally an army-centric force due to a history of internal counter-insurgency, the MAF must now pivot to address maritime and cyber threats. This requires a re-calibration of its force structure and a focus on new technologies like drones, cyber warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.
• Political Instability: Frequent changes in government have led to a lack of continuity in defense policy and the slow implementation of key reforms outlined in the country's first Defence White Paper. This political instability can stall long-term projects and strategic planning.
KEY FACTORS
BalasHapus1. Direct Negotiation and Lack of Open Tenders
A major problem is the frequent use of direct negotiation instead of open and competitive tenders. This practice, often justified under the pretext of national security, limits competition and reduces transparency. By bypassing the tender process, the government loses the ability to secure the best value for money, and it creates a fertile ground for corruption.
• Example: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal is a prime example. The multi-billion ringgit contract was awarded through direct negotiation, with a parliamentary inquiry later revealing that the decision ignored the navy's preference for a different ship design.
________________________________________
2. The Role of Middlemen and Agents
The procurement process is often riddled with intermediaries or agents who act as go-betweens for the military and foreign contractors. These middlemen, often with political connections or being former military personnel, add significant markups to the cost of equipment. This practice inflates prices, wastes public funds, and has been a major source of controversy. The King of Malondesh himself has publicly criticized this issue, warning against the influence of "agents and salesmen" in the Defence Ministry.
________________________________________
3. Financial Mismanagement and Weak Oversight
Government audits have consistently revealed systemic financial mismanagement.
• Failure to Collect Penalties: Audit reports have shown that the government failed to impose and collect penalties for delayed deliveries from contractors. In one case, a contractor for armored vehicles did not face a penalty of over RM160 million despite significant delays.
• Contract Splitting: To avoid the scrutiny of larger contracts, some projects are broken down into smaller ones, a practice known as "contract splitting." This allows them to bypass the open tender threshold and be awarded through less rigorous methods, raising concerns about accountability.
• Misappropriation of Funds: In the LCS scandal, a significant portion of the project's funds were allegedly used to pay off debts from old, unrelated naval projects, showcasing a severe lack of financial discipline
THE MALONDESH MILITARY HAS A SIGNIFICANT CAPABILITY GAP IN ITS COUNTER-INSURGENCY (COIN) AIRCRAFT FLEET, PRIMARILY DUE TO THE AGING AND LIMITED NUMBER OF LIGHT COMBAT AND SURVEILLANCE PLATFORMS SUITABLE FOR THIS TYPE OF ASYMMETRIC WARFARE.
BalasHapus1. Lack of Dedicated COIN Aircraft
Unlike a dedicated air force built for large-scale conventional warfare, a successful COIN force requires aircraft optimized for a unique set of missions:
• Low and Slow: COIN operations often occur in dense jungle or urban environments where fast jets are ineffective. They require aircraft that can fly low and slow to provide close air support and accurate surveillance.
• Persistent Presence: COIN aircraft must be able to loiter for extended periods to track insurgents and provide sustained support to ground troops.
• Cost-Effectiveness: Using expensive, high-performance fighter jets like the Su-30MKM for COIN missions is a significant waste of resources.
The Royal MalondeshAir Force (RMAF) lacks a dedicated fleet of such aircraft. Its existing fleet is more suited for air defense and conventional warfare, creating a mismatch between its capabilities and the specific demands of counter-insurgency.
________________________________________
2. Aging Fleet and Reliance on Other Assets
The RMAF's current inventory is not well-suited for the COIN role, forcing it to rely on a mix of aging platforms and less-than-ideal helicopters.
• Retired Aircraft: The RMAF has retired dedicated COIN aircraft like the Canadair CT-114 Tutor. This leaves a major gap that has not been adequately filled.
• Helicopter Gaps: While the Army operates light attack helicopters like the MD530G, these are limited in their range, endurance, and payload. This places a heavy burden on a small fleet to support ground forces over vast and often difficult terrain.
________________________________________
3. Delays in New Acquisitions
Malondeshis actively trying to address this gap, but procurement has been slow and challenging.
• FA-50M Purchase: The RMAF is acquiring 18 FA-50M light combat aircraft from Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI). These jets are intended to fulfill both a fighter lead-in trainer role and a light combat role. However, deliveries are not expected to begin until 2026. This leaves the RMAF with a capability gap in the interim.
• Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Malondeshhas made some progress in acquiring drones for surveillance, but these still do not fully replace the role of a manned COIN aircraft, which can provide more direct and immediate fire support.
THE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SEVERAL CRUCIAL, INTERRELATED PROBLEMS THAT AFFECT ITS OVERALL READINESS AND CAPABILITY. THESE ISSUES STEM FROM A COMBINATION OF CHRONIC UNDERFUNDING, A COMPLICATED PROCUREMENT PROCESS, AND A FRAGMENTED APPROACH TO MILITARY DEVELOPMENT.
BalasHapus1. Inefficient and Opaque Procurement
The most significant problem facing the Malondesh military is its procurement system. It's often criticized for a lack of transparency and a reliance on middlemen or agents, which leads to inflated prices and projects that fail to meet the military's actual needs.
• Cost Overruns and Delays: Projects, most notably the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, have been plagued by severe delays and massive cost overruns. None of the six ships have been delivered, despite significant payments. This has left the Royal Malondesh Navy (RMN) with an aging fleet, as many of its vessels are over 40 years old.
• "Middlemen" and Corruption: King Sultan Ibrahim has publicly criticized the involvement of agents and salesmen in defense deals, stating that these practices lead to "unreasonable" prices and purchases that don't fit the military's needs. This has raised concerns about corruption and inefficiency within the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF).
________________________________________
2. An Aging Fleet and Logistical Challenges
The Malondesh Armed Forces (MAF) operates a mixed fleet of military assets from a wide range of international suppliers. This lack of standardization creates a logistical nightmare.
• Fragmentation of Supply Chains: The military has equipment from various countries, including Russia, the United States, Poland, and China. Each platform requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Low Operational Readiness: Many of the Navy's vessels and Air Force's combat jets are well past their service life, leading to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational readiness rate.
• Reliance on Foreign Support: Due to a lack of local expertise, Malondesh is highly dependent on foreign suppliers for critical maintenance and spare parts, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions, such as international sanctions.
________________________________________
3. Capability Gaps and Lack of Specialization
The MAF has key capability gaps in crucial areas due to its historical focus on counter-insurgency and a lack of a unified doctrine.
• No Dedicated Marine Corps: Malondesh lacks a dedicated Marine Corps. Its amphibious capabilities are fragmented and distributed between the Army and Navy. This creates coordination problems and limits the ability to rapidly project power and respond to maritime threats, a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic nation.
• Limited Tank Fleet: The Army's tank force is limited to approximately 48 PT-91M Pendekar tanks. This small number restricts their strategic deployment and makes them less effective in a large-scale land conflict compared to neighbors with larger tank fleets.
• COIN Aircraft Gap: The Air Force lacks a dedicated fleet of Counter-Insurgency (COIN) aircraft. It's forced to use expensive multi-role fighter jets for low-intensity conflicts, which is inefficient. While a new batch of FA-50M light combat aircraft is on order, deliveries are not expected for several years.
THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS FOR MALONDESH ARMED FORCES IS WIDELY CRITICIZED FOR BEING INEFFICIENT AND OPAQUE, LEADING TO A SERIES OF HIGH-PROFILE SCANDALS, SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL WASTE, AND SERIOUS GAPS IN MILITARY READINESS. THIS SYSTEMIC PROBLEM IS ROOTED IN A LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, POLITICAL INTERFERENCE, AND A RELIANCE ON INDIRECT ACQUISITION METHODS.
BalasHapus1. The "Middleman" System
A key issue is the heavy reliance on agents, middlemen, and politically connected individuals to facilitate defense contracts. This practice often bypasses open tender processes, which are designed to ensure transparency and competition.
• Inflated Costs: These middlemen typically charge hefty commissions, inflating the final price of military assets. This was a point of public concern by King Sultan Ibrahim, who stated that such practices lead to buying "nonsense" that is overpriced and ill-suited for the military's actual needs.
• Inadequate Equipment: Since the procurement is driven by commercial interests rather than by the end-user (the military), the equipment acquired may not be the most suitable or effective for its intended purpose.
________________________________________
2. High-Profile Scandals and Delays
The most infamous example of a failed procurement is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program.
• Massive Delays and Cost Overruns: The program, valued at RM9 billion, was meant to deliver six modern frigates to the Royal Malondesh Navy (RMN). Despite paying over RM6 billion, not a single ship has been delivered. The project is years behind schedule and has been plagued by allegations of mismanagement and corruption.
• Financial Misappropriation: Investigations have revealed that a significant portion of the allocated funds was used for other purposes, with some estimates pointing to hundreds of millions of ringgit in financial irregularities. .
• Impact on Readiness: The failure of the LCS program has left the RMN with a dangerously aging fleet. Many of its vessels are over 40 years old, leading to higher maintenance costs and lower operational readiness rates.
________________________________________
3. Lack of Transparency and Accountability
The defense procurement process is shrouded in secrecy, which makes it difficult to hold officials accountable for failures.
• Direct Negotiations: The majority of large defense contracts are awarded through direct negotiation rather than open bidding, which limits public and parliamentary oversight.
• Limited Audits: While audit reports exist, their recommendations are often not implemented. This was highlighted in a recent Auditor-General's report, which found serious delays, weak oversight, and millions of ringgit in uncollected penalties from contractors.
• Political Interference: Declassified reports on the LCS scandal revealed that key decisions, such as the choice of ship design, were made by political leaders against the recommendations of the navy, the end-user. This kind of political interference compromises the military's ability to make sound, strategic decisions.
________________________________________
4. Broader Systemic Failures
The problems in procurement are part of a larger systemic issue within Malondesh defense framework.
• No Cohesive Strategy: The absence of a clear, long-term defense policy has led to ad-hoc, fragmented procurement decisions. This has resulted in a mixed fleet of assets from various countries, creating a logistical nightmare for maintenance and supply chains.
• Inadequate Penalties: When projects are delayed or fail, penalties on contractors are often not enforced, and new contracts are sometimes awarded to the same companies, perpetuating a cycle of
Wooiii malu wooiii berita apa ini Hahahahaha masih juga ngemis ke kuwait, gak ada harga diri bangsa sama sekali
BalasHapusKatanya "semakin hampir" lon?
BalasHapusFaktanya : Raja mu mengamook.ððĪŠððĪĢ
Kelewatan? Emang sudah sign beli lon?
BalasHapus=====
"...kelewatan penghantaran pesawat pejuang F/A-18 Legacy Hornet dari Kuwait.."
RONGSOKAN belum dibayar, tapi klaim terlambat dihantar....
Kih..kih..kih...ððĪŠððĪĢð§ðĐð
Sengsara sangat, ingin RONGSOKAN pun sangat sulit didapatkan Malaydesh...satu kata : MISKIN
BalasHapusðĪŠðððĪĢð§ðĐð
Lagipun, SAMPAH belum dibuang, tapi sudah dinantikan sangat...
BalasHapusHAHAHAHAHA...ðððĪŠððĪĢð§ðĐð
Malondesh banyak DRAMA MRCA....
BalasHapustapi semua Negara Dunia Produsen Jet Fighter tau kalo Malondesh itu MISKIN TIDAK PUNYA UANG SHOPPING MRCA, right???
THE MALONDESH MILITARY HAS A SIGNIFICANT CAPABILITY GAP IN ITS COUNTER-INSURGENCY (COIN) AIRCRAFT FLEET, PRIMARILY DUE TO THE AGING AND LIMITED NUMBER OF LIGHT COMBAT AND SURVEILLANCE PLATFORMS SUITABLE FOR THIS TYPE OF ASYMMETRIC WARFARE.
BalasHapus1. Lack of Dedicated COIN Aircraft
Unlike a dedicated air force built for large-scale conventional warfare, a successful COIN force requires aircraft optimized for a unique set of missions:
• Low and Slow: COIN operations often occur in dense jungle or urban environments where fast jets are ineffective. They require aircraft that can fly low and slow to provide close air support and accurate surveillance.
• Persistent Presence: COIN aircraft must be able to loiter for extended periods to track insurgents and provide sustained support to ground troops.
• Cost-Effectiveness: Using expensive, high-performance fighter jets like the Su-30MKM for COIN missions is a significant waste of resources.
The Royal MalondeshAir Force (RMAF) lacks a dedicated fleet of such aircraft. Its existing fleet is more suited for air defense and conventional warfare, creating a mismatch between its capabilities and the specific demands of counter-insurgency.
________________________________________
2. Aging Fleet and Reliance on Other Assets
The RMAF's current inventory is not well-suited for the COIN role, forcing it to rely on a mix of aging platforms and less-than-ideal helicopters.
• Retired Aircraft: The RMAF has retired dedicated COIN aircraft like the Canadair CT-114 Tutor. This leaves a major gap that has not been adequately filled.
• Helicopter Gaps: While the Army operates light attack helicopters like the MD530G, these are limited in their range, endurance, and payload. This places a heavy burden on a small fleet to support ground forces over vast and often difficult terrain.
________________________________________
3. Delays in New Acquisitions
Malondeshis actively trying to address this gap, but procurement has been slow and challenging.
• FA-50M Purchase: The RMAF is acquiring 18 FA-50M light combat aircraft from Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI). These jets are intended to fulfill both a fighter lead-in trainer role and a light combat role. However, deliveries are not expected to begin until 2026. This leaves the RMAF with a capability gap in the interim.
• Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Malondeshhas made some progress in acquiring drones for surveillance, but these still do not fully replace the role of a manned COIN aircraft, which can provide more direct and immediate fire support.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
Masih tertarik sama pesawat rongsokan ya ? ðð
BalasHapusMANA NIH BERUK TOLOL YG BILANG COME TO PAPA....HAHAHAAA
BalasHapusSEKEDAR NEGARA MISKIN JADI JURU SORAK SAJA YA LON !!!!
Ayooo puuur kurang semangat ngemisnya ke Kuwait jangan menyerah kirim orang lagi ke Kuwait sambil menangiss guling guling siapa tahu Kuwait mau kasih hornetnya
BalasHapusKalau ketawa dosa nggak ya ðððð
BalasHapusSewaa..sewaaaa haha!ððð
BalasHapusTHE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SIGNIFICANT LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES DUE TO A RELIANCE ON A DIVERSE RANGE OF PLATFORMS FROM DIFFERENT INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIERS, AGING EQUIPMENT, AND A LACK OF A COHESIVE, MODERN LOGISTICS SYSTEM. THIS CREATES PROBLEMS IN MAINTENANCE, READINESS, AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS.
BalasHapus1. Fragmentation of Supply Chains
Malondeshhas historically procured military equipment from various countries, including the United States, Russia, Poland, the United Kingdom, and China. This practice has created a complex and inefficient supply chain.
• Diverse Parts and Maintenance Needs: Each type of equipment, from the Polish-made PT-91M tanks to the Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets, requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Reliance on Foreign Suppliers: The military is highly dependent on foreign manufacturers for critical components. For example, sanctions on Russia have made it difficult to secure spare parts for the Su-30MKM fleet, leading to a low operational readiness rate.
• Obsolete Parts: A diverse and aging inventory means that many spare parts become obsolete. The Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) reportedly has millions of ringgit in unused, obsolete spare parts because of a mismatched fleet and inconsistent procurement.
2. Aging Fleet and High Maintenance Costs
A significant portion of Malondesh military assets is over 30 years old, which directly impacts operational readiness.
• Increased Maintenance Burden: Older vehicles, ships, and aircraft require more frequent and expensive maintenance. A 2021 study revealed that 34 of the RMN's 53 vessels had exceeded their intended service life, with 28 being over 40 years old. This leads to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational tempo.
• Inadequate Readiness: An aging fleet often fails to meet readiness targets. For instance, the MalondeshArmy's Type-B vehicles, which include non-armored transport vehicles, have historically failed to meet their mandated 80% serviceability rate, limiting their ability to support operations.
3. Delays and Mismanagement in Procurement
Long-standing procurement issues have worsened the logistical problems.
• Project Delays: The most prominent example is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program. The project has been plagued by delays and cost overruns, with no ships delivered despite significant payments. This has forced the RMN to rely on its aging fleet, which further strains its maintenance budget.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Investigations into major procurement projects, such as the LCS program, have revealed issues with mismanagement and alleged corruption. The use of "middlemen" has been criticized for inflating prices, while poor contract management has resulted in projects failing to meet deadlines or deliver on their promised capabilities.
4. Limited Local and Automated Support
While Malondeshis trying to develop its defense industry, a lack of local expertise and modern systems exacerbates logistical issues.
• Limited Local Production: Despite efforts to boost domestic defense industries, Malondeshstill heavily relies on foreign suppliers. This limits the ability to produce spare parts locally, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
• Outdated Inventory Management: Some military units still use manual, traditional methods for inventory and maintenance records. This prevents real-time tracking of assets and spare parts, leading to inefficiencies in maintenance planning and supply chain management
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
Alternatif buat Malondeshya MiG29 Ukraina
BalasHapusBekas kena drone Rusia ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Pada kemane tuch DUO malon-malon yang selalu FRAMING:
BalasHapusF-18 bekas pakai Kuwait Air Force Come to Papa ?
Kenapa Malondesh pada SIBUK SEMBUNYI di Bilik Termenung sambil TANTRUM KEPANASAN Loncat Loncat kesana kemari ketika artikel ini rilis di forum DS.
wkwkwkwkwkwkwkwk
BalasHapussekali ada berita tentang malondesh buat bilik termenong bucu katil jadi seronok
kata kunci KETIDAKTENTUAN
BalasHapuskata kunci KETIDAKTENTUAN
BalasHapusSETELAH KU WAIT WAIT EH AKHIRNYA TIDAK JELAS , KETIDAK TENTUAN , ADA SIH BIASA YANG PASTI , GAGAL BELI YA PEMBATALAN PROYEK.
BalasHapusAdoiimakkk
BalasHapus1.00 Malaysian Ringgit = 3,915 Indonesian Rupiah
1.00 US Dollar = 4.21Malaysian Ringgit
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
THE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SIGNIFICANT LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES DUE TO A RELIANCE ON A DIVERSE RANGE OF PLATFORMS FROM DIFFERENT INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIERS, AGING EQUIPMENT, AND A LACK OF A COHESIVE, MODERN LOGISTICS SYSTEM. THIS CREATES PROBLEMS IN MAINTENANCE, READINESS, AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS.
Hapus1. Fragmentation of Supply Chains
Malondeshhas historically procured military equipment from various countries, including the United States, Russia, Poland, the United Kingdom, and China. This practice has created a complex and inefficient supply chain.
• Diverse Parts and Maintenance Needs: Each type of equipment, from the Polish-made PT-91M tanks to the Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets, requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Reliance on Foreign Suppliers: The military is highly dependent on foreign manufacturers for critical components. For example, sanctions on Russia have made it difficult to secure spare parts for the Su-30MKM fleet, leading to a low operational readiness rate.
• Obsolete Parts: A diverse and aging inventory means that many spare parts become obsolete. The Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) reportedly has millions of ringgit in unused, obsolete spare parts because of a mismatched fleet and inconsistent procurement.
2. Aging Fleet and High Maintenance Costs
A significant portion of Malondesh military assets is over 30 years old, which directly impacts operational readiness.
• Increased Maintenance Burden: Older vehicles, ships, and aircraft require more frequent and expensive maintenance. A 2021 study revealed that 34 of the RMN's 53 vessels had exceeded their intended service life, with 28 being over 40 years old. This leads to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational tempo.
• Inadequate Readiness: An aging fleet often fails to meet readiness targets. For instance, the MalondeshArmy's Type-B vehicles, which include non-armored transport vehicles, have historically failed to meet their mandated 80% serviceability rate, limiting their ability to support operations.
3. Delays and Mismanagement in Procurement
Long-standing procurement issues have worsened the logistical problems.
• Project Delays: The most prominent example is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program. The project has been plagued by delays and cost overruns, with no ships delivered despite significant payments. This has forced the RMN to rely on its aging fleet, which further strains its maintenance budget.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Investigations into major procurement projects, such as the LCS program, have revealed issues with mismanagement and alleged corruption. The use of "middlemen" has been criticized for inflating prices, while poor contract management has resulted in projects failing to meet deadlines or deliver on their promised capabilities.
4. Limited Local and Automated Support
While Malondeshis trying to develop its defense industry, a lack of local expertise and modern systems exacerbates logistical issues.
• Limited Local Production: Despite efforts to boost domestic defense industries, Malondeshstill heavily relies on foreign suppliers. This limits the ability to produce spare parts locally, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
• Outdated Inventory Management: Some military units still use manual, traditional methods for inventory and maintenance records. This prevents real-time tracking of assets and spare parts, leading to inefficiencies in maintenance planning and supply chain management
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
THE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SIGNIFICANT LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES DUE TO A RELIANCE ON A DIVERSE RANGE OF PLATFORMS FROM DIFFERENT INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIERS, AGING EQUIPMENT, AND A LACK OF A COHESIVE, MODERN LOGISTICS SYSTEM. THIS CREATES PROBLEMS IN MAINTENANCE, READINESS, AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS.
Hapus1. Fragmentation of Supply Chains
Malondeshhas historically procured military equipment from various countries, including the United States, Russia, Poland, the United Kingdom, and China. This practice has created a complex and inefficient supply chain.
• Diverse Parts and Maintenance Needs: Each type of equipment, from the Polish-made PT-91M tanks to the Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets, requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Reliance on Foreign Suppliers: The military is highly dependent on foreign manufacturers for critical components. For example, sanctions on Russia have made it difficult to secure spare parts for the Su-30MKM fleet, leading to a low operational readiness rate.
• Obsolete Parts: A diverse and aging inventory means that many spare parts become obsolete. The Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) reportedly has millions of ringgit in unused, obsolete spare parts because of a mismatched fleet and inconsistent procurement.
2. Aging Fleet and High Maintenance Costs
A significant portion of Malondesh military assets is over 30 years old, which directly impacts operational readiness.
• Increased Maintenance Burden: Older vehicles, ships, and aircraft require more frequent and expensive maintenance. A 2021 study revealed that 34 of the RMN's 53 vessels had exceeded their intended service life, with 28 being over 40 years old. This leads to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational tempo.
• Inadequate Readiness: An aging fleet often fails to meet readiness targets. For instance, the MalondeshArmy's Type-B vehicles, which include non-armored transport vehicles, have historically failed to meet their mandated 80% serviceability rate, limiting their ability to support operations.
3. Delays and Mismanagement in Procurement
Long-standing procurement issues have worsened the logistical problems.
• Project Delays: The most prominent example is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program. The project has been plagued by delays and cost overruns, with no ships delivered despite significant payments. This has forced the RMN to rely on its aging fleet, which further strains its maintenance budget.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Investigations into major procurement projects, such as the LCS program, have revealed issues with mismanagement and alleged corruption. The use of "middlemen" has been criticized for inflating prices, while poor contract management has resulted in projects failing to meet deadlines or deliver on their promised capabilities.
4. Limited Local and Automated Support
While Malondeshis trying to develop its defense industry, a lack of local expertise and modern systems exacerbates logistical issues.
• Limited Local Production: Despite efforts to boost domestic defense industries, Malondeshstill heavily relies on foreign suppliers. This limits the ability to produce spare parts locally, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
• Outdated Inventory Management: Some military units still use manual, traditional methods for inventory and maintenance records. This prevents real-time tracking of assets and spare parts, leading to inefficiencies in maintenance planning and supply chain management
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
THE REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY ASSETS IN MALONDESHHAS BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY STALLED, PARTICULARLY FOR THE ROYAL MALONDESHAIR FORCE (RMAF), DUE TO A COMBINATION OF FACTORS INCLUDING A RELIANCE ON A SINGLE FOREIGN SUPPLIER, COMPLEX LOGISTICAL ISSUES, AND DELAYS IN PROPOSED ACQUISITION DEALS.
HapusStalled Fighter Jet Replacements
The RMAF's fighter fleet, including the Sukhoi Su-30MKM and the F/A-18D Hornet, is aging, with many jets having been in service for decades. The replacement programs have been beset by a number of issues:
• Reliance on a Single Foreign Supplier: The RMAF's fleet of Su-30MKM jets, acquired from Russia, has faced persistent challenges with spare parts and maintenance, leading to a low operational readiness rate. International sanctions on Russia have exacerbated these issues, making it difficult for Malondeshto secure the necessary components to keep its fleet fully operational.
• Failed Acquisition of Used Hornets: Malondeshhad planned to acquire a number of used F/A-18C/D Hornet jets from Kuwait as a stop-gap measure. However, this deal has been subject to long delays because Kuwait itself is waiting for the delivery of its new F/A-18E/F Super Hornets from the United States. This uncertainty has prompted Malondeshto reconsider the deal and explore other options.
• Long-Term Modernization Delays: Malondesh long-term plan to replace its fighter fleet by 2040 with a fifth-generation stealth platform, such as the F-35 or Rafale, is a distant goal. The current delays in stop-gap measures and the high cost of new jets have left the RMAF with a significant capability gap in the interim.
________________________________________
Other Delays
The problems are not limited to the Air Force. The Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) and the MalondeshArmy also face significant delays in their modernization programs.
• Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program: This program, meant to deliver six modern frigates to the RMN, has been crippled by severe delays and cost overruns. None of the ships have been delivered, forcing the Navy to rely on an aging fleet, with many vessels now over 40 years old.
• Logistical Challenges: The stalled acquisitions and a lack of a single, coherent modernization strategy have created a logistical nightmare. The RMN, for example, has accumulated hundreds of millions of ringgit in unused and obsolete spare parts because of its mixed fleet from various international suppliers.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
MISKIN = OVERLIMITS DEBT
HapusGOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
As of June 2025, Malondesh's federal government debt was RM 1.3 trillion, up from RM 1.25 trillion at the end of 2024, with a projected debt-to-GDP ratio of 69% by the end of 2025. Simultaneously, household debt reached RM 1.65 trillion in March 2025, representing 84.3% of GDP, but this level is considered manageable due to strong household financial assets, which are 2.1 times higher than the total debt.
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
MISKIN ......
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
The Finance Ministry stated that the aggregate national household DEBT stood at RM1.53 trillion between 2018 and 2023. In aggregate, it said the household DEBT for 2022 was RM1.45 trillion, followed by RM1.38 trillion (2021,) RM1.32 trillion (2020), RM1.25 trillion (2019) and RM1.19 trillion (2018). “The ratio of household DEBT to gross domestic product (GDP) at the end of 2023 also slightly increased to 84.3% compared with 82% in 2018,” it said
===================
2024 = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2024 = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2024 = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
"Pinjaman ini digunakan untuk melunasi DEBT matang sebesar RM20.6 miliar, dengan sisa RM49,9 miliar menutupi defisit dan masa jatuh tempo DEBT di masa depan," kata MOF.
---
2023 = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2023 = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2023 = HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
Pada tahun 2023, pinjaman baru Kerajaan Persekutuan MALONDESH mencapai RM1.173 triliun, naik 8,6% dari tahun 2022.
Rincian pinjaman
• Pinjaman baru Kerajaan Persekutuan MALONDESH pada tahun 2023 naik RM92,918 miliar
• Rasio utang terhadap PDB MALONDESH pada tahun 2023 mencapai 64,3%
---
2022 = 52,4% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2022 = 52,4% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2022 = 52,4% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
Kah Woh menjelaskan pada tahun lalu, kerajaan ada membuat pinjaman yang meningkat sebanyak 11.6 peratus daripada RM194.5 bilion pada tahun sebelumnya. Daripada jumlah itu, beliau berkata 52.4 peratus atau RM113.7 bilion digunakan untuk membayar prinsipal pinjaman matang.
---
2021 = 50,4% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2021 = 50,4% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2021 = 50,4% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
Sejumlah RM98.058 bilion atau 50.4 peratus daripada pinjaman baharu berjumlah RM194.555 bilion yang dibuat kerajaan pada tahun lalu digunakan untuk bayaran balik prinsipal pinjaman yang matang.
---
2020 = 60% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2020 = 60% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2020 = 60% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
Jabatan Audit Negara (JAN) bimbang dengan tindakan kerajaan menggunakan hampir 60 peratus pinjaman baharu untuk membayar DEBT sedia ada pada tahun lalu, berbanding bagi perbelanjaan pembangunan.
---
2019 = 59% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2019 = 59% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
2019 = 59% HUTANG BAYAR HUTANG
Laporan Ketua Audit Negara mengenai Penyata Kewangan Kerajaan Persekutuan 2018 mendapati sejumlah 59 peratus pinjaman baharu kerajaan dibuat untuk membayar DEBT kerajaan terdahulu
---
2018 = OPEN DONASI
2018 = OPEN DONASI
2018 = OPEN DONASI
Kementerian Keuangan MALONDESH pada hari Rabu membuka rekening donasi supaya masyarakat dapat menyumbang untuk membantu negara membayar utang yang mencapai 1 triliun ringgit (US$ 250,8 miliar) atau 80 persen dari PDB
THE REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY ASSETS IN MALONDESHHAS BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY STALLED, PARTICULARLY FOR THE ROYAL MALONDESHAIR FORCE (RMAF), DUE TO A COMBINATION OF FACTORS INCLUDING A RELIANCE ON A SINGLE FOREIGN SUPPLIER, COMPLEX LOGISTICAL ISSUES, AND DELAYS IN PROPOSED ACQUISITION DEALS.
HapusStalled Fighter Jet Replacements
The RMAF's fighter fleet, including the Sukhoi Su-30MKM and the F/A-18D Hornet, is aging, with many jets having been in service for decades. The replacement programs have been beset by a number of issues:
• Reliance on a Single Foreign Supplier: The RMAF's fleet of Su-30MKM jets, acquired from Russia, has faced persistent challenges with spare parts and maintenance, leading to a low operational readiness rate. International sanctions on Russia have exacerbated these issues, making it difficult for Malondeshto secure the necessary components to keep its fleet fully operational.
• Failed Acquisition of Used Hornets: Malondeshhad planned to acquire a number of used F/A-18C/D Hornet jets from Kuwait as a stop-gap measure. However, this deal has been subject to long delays because Kuwait itself is waiting for the delivery of its new F/A-18E/F Super Hornets from the United States. This uncertainty has prompted Malondeshto reconsider the deal and explore other options.
• Long-Term Modernization Delays: Malondesh long-term plan to replace its fighter fleet by 2040 with a fifth-generation stealth platform, such as the F-35 or Rafale, is a distant goal. The current delays in stop-gap measures and the high cost of new jets have left the RMAF with a significant capability gap in the interim.
________________________________________
Other Delays
The problems are not limited to the Air Force. The Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) and the MalondeshArmy also face significant delays in their modernization programs.
• Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program: This program, meant to deliver six modern frigates to the RMN, has been crippled by severe delays and cost overruns. None of the ships have been delivered, forcing the Navy to rely on an aging fleet, with many vessels now over 40 years old.
• Logistical Challenges: The stalled acquisitions and a lack of a single, coherent modernization strategy have created a logistical nightmare. The RMN, for example, has accumulated hundreds of millions of ringgit in unused and obsolete spare parts because of its mixed fleet from various international suppliers.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
Adoiimakkk
BalasHapus1.00 Malaysian Ringgit = 3,915 Indonesian Rupiah
1.00 US Dollar = 4.21Malaysian Ringgit
The Malondesh Armed Forces' assets are a mix of modern and aging equipment spread across three branches: the Army, Navy, and Air Force. A significant portion of these assets, totaling 171 units, is over 30 years old, creating a number of readiness and logistical challenges.
Hapus________________________________________
MalondeshArmy ðēðū
The MalondeshArmy's assets are a mix of domestic and foreign-sourced equipment, but many face issues with age and quantity.
• Tanks: The main battle tank (MBT) is the PT-91M Pendekar, a modernized version of the T-72. The main issue is the small number of units (around 48), which limits strategic deployment and sustained operations.
• Armored Vehicles: The Army has a diverse fleet of armored vehicles, including the locally produced DefTech AV8 Gempita and the ACV-300 Adnan. While locally-made vehicles offer some logistical advantages, the diverse range of platforms from different countries can create complexities in maintenance and spare parts supply.
• Artillery: The Army operates the G5 Mk III 155mm howitzer and the Astros II MLRS. Some of these systems have been in service for a considerable time, raising concerns about their readiness and effectiveness against modern threats.
________________________________________
Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN) ⚓
The RMN's fleet is grappling with significant issues related to aging ships, maintenance, and delayed procurement. A recent audit revealed that 34 of the RMN's 53 vessels have exceeded their intended service life, with 28 being over 40 years old.
• Fleet Aging: Many of the Navy's ships are past their prime. This has led to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational readiness rate.
• Procurement Delays: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, intended to provide six new frigates, has been plagued by major delays and cost overruns. None of the ships have been delivered, forcing the navy to continue operating its aging vessels.
• Logistical Problems: The lack of a consistent procurement strategy has resulted in a fleet with various classes of ships from different manufacturers. This has created logistical nightmares, with the RMN holding over RM380 million in unused spare parts, some of which are now obsolete and no longer compatible with the active fleet.
________________________________________
Royal MalondeshAir Force (RMAF) ✈️
The RMAF's assets face challenges related to maintenance, parts supply, and a shrinking fleet of combat aircraft.
• Aging Fleet and Modernization: The RMAF's fleet of combat aircraft, including the Sukhoi Su-30MKM and F/A-18D Hornet, is aging. While the RMAF is undergoing a Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) for the Sukhois, these jets will eventually need to be replaced.
• Supply Chain Issues: The RMAF's reliance on Russian-made aircraft like the Su-30MKM has created spare parts and maintenance challenges, particularly in light of international sanctions.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
THE WEAKNESSES OF THE MALONDESHMILITARY'S TANK FORCE ARE PRIMARILY CENTERED ON QUANTITY, AGE, AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES. THE ROYAL ARMOURED CORPS OPERATES A SMALL FLEET OF MAIN BATTLE TANKS (MBTS), WHICH LIMITS ITS CAPABILITIES IN COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL POWERS.
Hapus1. Limited Number of Tanks
Malondesh main battle tank fleet consists of a small number of PT-91M Pendekar tanks. The exact number varies in reports, but it is generally cited as around 48 units. This number is significantly lower than neighboring countries like Indonesia, which has a much larger tank fleet. This limited quantity can be a major disadvantage in a large-scale land conflict, as it restricts the ability to deploy tanks across different operational theaters and provides less strategic depth.
2. Obsolescence and Maintenance Issues
The PT-91M, while a capable tank, is a modernized variant of the T-72, a design that dates back to the Soviet era. While the Malondeshversion has been upgraded with a new engine, fire control system, and reactive armor, it still faces challenges related to its older design.
• Reliance on a Single Supplier: The PT-91M was purchased from Poland. This creates a dependency on a single foreign supplier for spare parts and maintenance, a problem that has been highlighted with the PT-91M. The Polish manufacturer has ceased production of some key components, which has led to a proposed Life Extension Program (LEP) to ensure the tanks remain operational. This program will rely on local expertise, which can be a slow and expensive process.
• Vulnerability to Modern Threats: The PT-91M, like many older tank designs, can be vulnerable to modern anti-tank weapons and drone attacks. While it is equipped with ERAWA-2 explosive reactive armor to protect against shaped-charge projectiles, it may be less effective against modern kinetic energy penetrators.
3. Logistical and Operational Constraints
Malondesh tank force also faces logistical challenges that can hinder its effectiveness.
• Mobility: While the PT-91M's weight (48.5 tonnes) makes it suitable for Malondesh often soft and uneven terrain, it may still face difficulties with older infrastructure, such as bridges with lower weight limits.
• Readiness: The small number of tanks and maintenance issues can impact the readiness of the fleet. Breakdowns have been reported in the past, underscoring the challenges of keeping a small fleet of specialized vehicles operational.
Ultimately, the main weakness of Malondesh tank force is not necessarily the quality of the PT-91M itself, but rather the small size of the fleet and the long-term logistical challenges of maintaining an aging and specialized inventory.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
THE MAIN KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN MALONDESH MILITARY WITHOUT A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS STEM FROM A LACK OF A UNIFIED DOCTRINE, fragmented command, and limited indigenous expertise in the complex field of amphibious warfare.
HapusFragmentation of Doctrine and Training
A dedicated Marine Corps provides a single, cohesive doctrine for amphibious operations. In Malondesh , this expertise is distributed across the MalondeshArmy and the Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN), leading to several problems:
• No Single Amphibious Doctrine: There is no single, codified doctrine that governs how land and sea forces should work together in an amphibious assault. While some units, like the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, have amphibious training, they are primarily land-centric. This creates a disconnect between the Army's maneuver doctrine and the Navy's ship-to-shore logistics.
• Reliance on Foreign Partners: Malondeshheavily relies on joint exercises with countries that have a Marine Corps, such as the U.S. and the Philippines. These exercises, like CARAT and Bersama Warrior, are crucial for developing skills and interoperability. However, this reliance means that Malondesh forces are not constantly developing their own expertise and can only practice these complex operations during limited, often ad-hoc, training periods.
Gaps in Expertise and Personnel
A dedicated Marine Corps cultivates a deep bench of personnel with specialized knowledge in all aspects of amphibious warfare. The absence of this creates several key gaps in expertise:
• Limited Specialist Roles: Amphibious warfare requires a wide range of specialized skills, from beach reconnaissance and hydrographic surveying to coordinating ship-to-shore fire support and managing logistics in a contested littoral environment. Without a Marine Corps, Malondeshlacks a consistent, institutionalized way to train and retain personnel in these niche roles.
• Challenges in Joint Operations: The lack of a shared understanding and common language between the Army and Navy can hinder effective joint operations. In a real-world scenario, this can lead to delays in decision-making, poor communication, and a lack of synchronized action—all of which are critical for the success of an amphibious landing.
• Weakened Expeditionary Capability: A Marine Corps is an expeditionary force by nature, designed to deploy quickly and project power from the sea. Malondesh military, without this dedicated component, lacks the ability to rapidly deploy a self-sustaining force for missions like humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, or securing remote territories. This is a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic state with a vast maritime domain.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
THE MAIN KNOWLEDGE GAPS IN MALONDESH MILITARY WITHOUT A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS STEM FROM A LACK OF A UNIFIED DOCTRINE, fragmented command, and limited indigenous expertise in the complex field of amphibious warfare.
HapusFragmentation of Doctrine and Training
A dedicated Marine Corps provides a single, cohesive doctrine for amphibious operations. In Malondesh , this expertise is distributed across the MalondeshArmy and the Royal MalondeshNavy (RMN), leading to several problems:
• No Single Amphibious Doctrine: There is no single, codified doctrine that governs how land and sea forces should work together in an amphibious assault. While some units, like the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade, have amphibious training, they are primarily land-centric. This creates a disconnect between the Army's maneuver doctrine and the Navy's ship-to-shore logistics.
• Reliance on Foreign Partners: Malondeshheavily relies on joint exercises with countries that have a Marine Corps, such as the U.S. and the Philippines. These exercises, like CARAT and Bersama Warrior, are crucial for developing skills and interoperability. However, this reliance means that Malondesh forces are not constantly developing their own expertise and can only practice these complex operations during limited, often ad-hoc, training periods.
Gaps in Expertise and Personnel
A dedicated Marine Corps cultivates a deep bench of personnel with specialized knowledge in all aspects of amphibious warfare. The absence of this creates several key gaps in expertise:
• Limited Specialist Roles: Amphibious warfare requires a wide range of specialized skills, from beach reconnaissance and hydrographic surveying to coordinating ship-to-shore fire support and managing logistics in a contested littoral environment. Without a Marine Corps, Malondeshlacks a consistent, institutionalized way to train and retain personnel in these niche roles.
• Challenges in Joint Operations: The lack of a shared understanding and common language between the Army and Navy can hinder effective joint operations. In a real-world scenario, this can lead to delays in decision-making, poor communication, and a lack of synchronized action—all of which are critical for the success of an amphibious landing.
• Weakened Expeditionary Capability: A Marine Corps is an expeditionary force by nature, designed to deploy quickly and project power from the sea. Malondesh military, without this dedicated component, lacks the ability to rapidly deploy a self-sustaining force for missions like humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, or securing remote territories. This is a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic state with a vast maritime domain.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
BERIKUT ADALAH BEBERAPA CONTOH KAPAL TLDM YANG DIANGGAP USANG ATAU SUDAH TIDAK LAYAK OPERASIONAL:
Hapus• Korvet Kelas Laksamana: Baru-baru ini, tiga korvet kelas Laksamana, yaitu KD Laksamana Tun Abdul Jamil, KD Laksamana Tan Pusmah, dan KD Pendekar, telah secara resmi dinonaktifkan. Kapal-kapal ini dibangun di Italia pada tahun 1980-an dan telah bertugas selama beberapa dekade. Penonaktifan ini adalah bagian dari rencana untuk mengganti kapal-kapal usang dengan aset yang lebih modern, seperti Littoral Combat Ship (LCS).
• Kapal Serangan Cepat (Fast Attack Craft): KD Pendekar, yang dinonaktifkan bersama dua korvet Laksamana, adalah contoh kapal serangan cepat yang telah lama bertugas sejak tahun 1979. Usia kapal ini yang sangat tua menunjukkan keterbatasan dalam teknologi dan kemampuan operasional dibandingkan dengan kapal modern.
• Kapal Patroli Kelas Kris dan Sabah: Kapal-kapal patroli ini telah dinonaktifkan atau dialihkan ke MMEA. Meskipun telah melayani TLDM selama lebih dari 30 tahun, keterbatasan operasionalnya, seperti jangkauan patroli yang pendek, membuatnya tidak lagi efektif untuk misi pengawasan di perairan yang lebih luas, seperti Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE) Malondesh yang membentang lebih dari 320 km.
• Kapal Pendukung Serbaguna (Multi-Purpose Support Ships): Kapal-kapal lama seperti KD Sri Indera Sakti dan KD Mahawangsa telah mencapai batas usia pakainya. TLDM memiliki rencana untuk menggantinya dengan Kapal Pendukung Serbaguna Multi-Role Support Ship (MRSS) yang baru, tetapi pelaksanaannya menghadapi kendala.
• Armada Secara Umum: Secara keseluruhan, rata-rata usia kapal tempur dan patroli TLDM saat ini lebih dari 25 tahun, dengan mayoritas kapal bahkan berusia lebih dari 30 tahun. Kapal-kapal yang sudah terlalu tua ini sering kali mencapai titik di mana biaya pemeliharaan menjadi sangat tinggi dan tidak efisien. Program modernisasi yang tertunda, seperti proyek Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) yang mengalami penundaan, memperburuk masalah ini.
Kapal-Kapal Usang Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malondesh (MMEA)
• Kapal Patroli Tua (Ex-Police and Fisheries Vessels): Banyak kapal patroli MMEA sebelumnya adalah kapal milik Pasukan Polis Marin (PPM) atau Jabatan Perikanan. Contohnya termasuk kapal-kapal dari kelas "Gagah" dan "Nusa". Meskipun beberapa kapal ini telah menjalani program pembaruan (repowering) untuk mengganti mesin dan melakukan perbaikan struktural, usia desain dan lambungnya tetap membatasi kemampuan mereka.
• Kurangnya Kapal Patroli Jarak Jauh (Offshore Patrol Vessels): MMEA sangat membutuhkan Kapal Patroli Lepas Pantai (Offshore Patrol Vessels - OPV) yang lebih besar dan modern untuk misi pengawasan di ZEE. Proyek pengadaan OPV untuk MMEA mengalami berbagai tantangan. Ini berarti MMEA masih harus mengandalkan kapal-kapal yang lebih kecil dengan jangkauan dan daya tahan yang terbatas untuk mengawasi perairan yang sangat luas.
• Donasi dan Transfer Kapal: MMEA juga menerima kapal-kapal yang dinonaktifkan dari angkatan laut negara lain, seperti kapal patroli dari Amerika Serikat (Ex-USCGC Steadfast) dan Australia. Meskipun ini dapat menjadi solusi cepat untuk menambah armada, kapal-kapal ini sering kali sudah berusia dan memerlukan pemeliharaan dan suku cadang yang khusus, yang dapat menjadi tantangan logistik.
Dampak dari Armada yang Usang
• Kesiapan Operasional yang Rendah: Kapal-kapal yang usang cenderung lebih sering mengalami kerusakan, yang mengurangi waktu operasional mereka di laut. Hal ini berdampak langsung pada kemampuan TLDM dan MMEA untuk melakukan patroli, penegakan hukum, dan operasi keamanan maritim secara efektif.
• Biaya Pemeliharaan yang Tinggi: Sebagaimana disebutkan dalam laporan, banyak kapal tua sudah mencapai "titik pengembalian yang menurun" (point of diminishing returns), di mana biaya pemeliharaan dan perbaikan menjadi lebih besar daripada nilai dan kegunaan operasional kapal itu sendiri.
THE PRIMARY WEAKNESS OF THE MALONDESHMILITARY'S AMPHIBIOUS CAPABILITIES IS THE LACK OF A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS. INSTEAD OF A SINGLE, specialized branch, Malondesh amphibious forces are fragmented and distributed among different services, which creates several significant gaps.
Hapus1. Fragmentation of Command and Control
Without a unified Marine Corps, the various units responsible for amphibious operations—such as the Army's 10th Parachute Brigade and the Navy's PASKAL—must coordinate their efforts during a mission. This lack of a single, dedicated command structure can lead to:
• Slower Response Times: The time required to coordinate and deploy different units from separate services can delay a rapid response to maritime threats or humanitarian crises.
• Interoperability Issues: Despite joint exercises, the different services have distinct doctrines, equipment, and training, which can lead to communication and operational gaps in a real-world scenario.
2. Limited Dedicated Assets
A dedicated Marine Corps typically possesses its own fleet of specialized equipment designed for amphibious operations, such as amphibious assault vehicles (AAVs) and large landing craft. The MalondeshArmed Forces (MAF) lack a similar inventory, relying on a more limited and general-purpose set of assets.
• Reliance on Older or Less Capable Platforms: While the MalondeshNavy is modernizing, its current fleet may not be sufficient for large-scale amphibious operations. The absence of a dedicated fleet of landing ships and AAVs limits the force's ability to transport troops and heavy equipment from sea to shore efficiently.
3. Reduced Deterrence and Strategic Projection
In a region with growing maritime disputes, a dedicated amphibious force serves as a powerful deterrent. Its existence signals a nation's ability and resolve to project power and defend its territorial claims.
• Vulnerability in Maritime Disputes: Malondeshis a claimant in the South China Sea, and the lack of a dedicated Marine Corps may be perceived as a strategic weakness when dealing with more assertive neighbors. The 2013 Lahad Datu incursion, for example, exposed a gap in the military's ability to swiftly and decisively respond to a maritime-based threat.
4. Constraints on Training and Expertise
While Malondeshforces regularly train with foreign partners like the U.S. Marine Corps, this exposure is not a substitute for having a fully integrated, self-sustaining force.
• Knowledge Gaps: Without a dedicated Marine Corps, the continuous development of a specialized doctrine and expertise in amphibious warfare is hindered. This can lead to a reliance on foreign partners for high-end amphibious training, rather than being able to conduct such training internally and on a large scale
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
HERE ARE THE KEY ASEAN NATIONS WITH A DEDICATED MARINE CORPS:
Hapus________________________________________
Indonesia ðŪðĐ
Indonesia's Korps Marinir Republik Indonesia (KORMAR RI) is a highly capable and well-established Marine Corps that is a core component of the Indonesian Navy (TNI AL).
• Geographical Imperative: As the world's largest archipelagic state with over 17,000 islands, Indonesia requires a force that can project power across its vast maritime domain. KORMAR's primary role is to conduct amphibious operations, secure strategic coastal areas, and defend remote islands.
• Size and Capabilities: KORMAR is a substantial force with its own armor, artillery, and specialized units. It can operate independently or as a key part of a larger naval task force, making it essential for a nation with such a dispersed territory.
• Historical Context: The Korps Marinir was formed in 1945 during the Indonesian National Revolution, giving it a long history and a firm place in the country's military structure. Its missions have included counter-insurgency and securing the nation's borders.
________________________________________
Philippines ðĩð
The Philippine Marine Corps (PMC) is the naval infantry force of the Philippine Navy.
• Archipelagic Defense: Like Indonesia, the Philippines is an archipelago, making a dedicated Marine Corps vital for internal and external security. The PMC's role is to conduct amphibious, expeditionary, and special operations missions to defend the country's extensive coastline and numerous islands.
• Missions: The PMC is heavily involved in operations against communist insurgents and extremist groups. It has also been instrumental in securing disputed areas, such as the Spratly Islands, and in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts, a critical role given the Philippines' vulnerability to natural disasters.
• U.S. Influence: The Philippine Marine Corps was formed with assistance from the U.S. Marine Corps and shares many of its traditions, including its rank system and some ceremonial practices.
________________________________________
Thailand ðđð
The Royal Thai Marine Corps (RTMC) is a specialized amphibious force that is part of the Royal Thai Navy.
• Historical Ties: The RTMC has a long history, with its origins tracing back to the early 20th century, and it was significantly developed with the assistance of the U.S. Marine Corps.
• Missions: The RTMC's responsibilities include coastal defense, amphibious operations, and internal security, particularly in the country's southern provinces. They have also been involved in counter-insurgency operations on the Malondeshborder and in peacekeeping missions.
• Modernization: The RTMC has been modernizing its forces, acquiring specialized equipment like amphibious assault vehicles to enhance its capability for power projection from the sea to the shore.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. MASALAH PERAWATAN DAN KESIAPAN OPERASIONAL ð§
HapusIni adalah kelemahan yang paling sering disorot dan menjadi viral di media sosial.
• Insiden Mogok di Jalan Umum: Tank PT-91M Pendekar pernah beberapa kali mogok di tengah jalan raya, bahkan saat sedang dalam perjalanan untuk acara parade Hari Kemerdekaan. Insiden ini menimbulkan pertanyaan serius dari masyarakat dan parlemen tentang standar perawatan aset militer.
• Kurangnya Suku Cadang: Masalah ini adalah inti dari inefisiensi. Penghentian produksi suku cadang oleh produsen aslinya, Bumar Labedy, memaksa Malondesh untuk mencari solusi alternatif. Upaya ini termasuk menggunakan tenaga ahli lokal untuk memproduksi komponen tertentu, tetapi ini menunjukkan ketergantungan yang rapuh pada produsen eksternal dan kurangnya jaminan rantai pasokan.
• Kurva Pembelajaran yang Curam: Sebagai negara pertama di Asia Tenggara yang mengoperasikan MBT modern, Malondesh menghadapi tantangan dalam mengembangkan basis pengetahuan, keahlian, dan infrastruktur untuk perawatan tank tersebut. Hal ini berbeda dengan negara-negara yang sudah memiliki pengalaman lebih lama dalam mengelola aset militer yang kompleks.
________________________________________
2. Keterbatasan Teknis dan Operasional ⚙️
Meskipun PT-91M adalah versi yang ditingkatkan dari T-72, beberapa keterbatasan masih ada.
• Desain Lama dan Kerentanan: PT-91M merupakan turunan dari T-72, yang memiliki desain kokpit dan penyimpanan amunisi yang terkenal rentan. Dalam pertempuran modern, ini bisa menjadi kelemahan fatal jika dibandingkan dengan tank-tank tempur utama lain yang lebih baru dengan desain yang lebih aman.
• Kemampuan Serangan Terbatas: Dibandingkan dengan tank tempur utama modern yang dimiliki oleh negara tetangga, seperti Leopard 2A4 milik Singapura dan Indonesia, PT-91M Pendekar dianggap memiliki sistem kendali tembak dan perlindungan yang kurang unggul. Meskipun dilengkapi dengan Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA), perlindungan ini mungkin tidak cukup untuk menahan serangan dari amunisi anti-tank terbaru.
________________________________________
3. Masalah Pengadaan dan Jumlah yang Tidak Memadai ð°
• Skandal dan Inefisiensi: Sama seperti proyek kapal LCS, skandal pengadaan dan inefisiensi juga terjadi dalam program tank. Laporan menunjukkan adanya masalah tata kelola yang buruk dalam manajemen kontrak, yang menyebabkan aset tidak dapat digunakan secara maksimal.
• Jumlah yang Sedikit: Malondesh hanya memiliki 48 unit tank PT-91M Pendekar. Jumlah ini dianggap sangat tidak memadai untuk kebutuhan pertahanan negara, terutama jika dibandingkan dengan negara tetangga yang memiliki jumlah armada lapis baja yang jauh lebih besar.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
Adoiimakkk
BalasHapus1.00 Malaysian Ringgit = 3,915 Indonesian Rupiah
1.00 US Dollar = 4.21Malaysian Ringgit
1. Keterbatasan Jumlah dan Kualitas
Hapus• Jumlah yang Tidak Memadai: Dibandingkan dengan negara-negara lain di kawasan, terutama Indonesia, jumlah kendaraan lapis baja yang dimiliki Malondesh relatif sedikit. Misalnya, perbandingan kekuatan darat menunjukkan Indonesia memiliki sekitar 20.440 kendaraan lapis baja, sementara Malondesh hanya memiliki sekitar 13.506 unit. Angka ini juga menunjukkan Indonesia memiliki lebih banyak tank tempur (331 unit) dibandingkan Malondesh (48 unit). Keterbatasan ini memengaruhi kemampuan Malondesh dalam menjalankan operasi darat berskala besar.
• Ketergantungan pada Model Lama: Meskipun memiliki beberapa unit modern seperti AV8 Gempita, Angkatan Darat Malondesh masih mengoperasikan kendaraan lapis baja tua yang sudah usang. Hal ini menciptakan tantangan logistik yang besar dan membuat kekuatan darat kurang homogen.
2. Masalah Kesiapan Operasional dan Pemeliharaan
Ini adalah salah satu kelemahan paling signifikan dan sering disorot.
• Sering Mogok: Kendaraan lapis baja Malondesh, termasuk tank, seringkali dilaporkan mogok di jalan raya atau saat latihan. Insiden ini tidak hanya menjadi bahan ejekan publik tetapi juga mengindikasikan kurangnya perawatan rutin dan pemeliharaan yang memadai.
• Kurangnya Suku Cadang: Masalah ini terkait dengan keragaman jenis kendaraan yang dimiliki Malondesh. Karena mereka membeli kendaraan dari berbagai negara produsen, pasokan suku cadang sering kali tidak terjamin, menyebabkan unit-unit tidak dapat beroperasi dalam jangka waktu lama.
• Skandal dan Korupsi: Seperti yang terjadi pada proyek kapal LCS, skandal pengadaan dan pemeliharaan juga terjadi pada kendaraan lapis baja. Laporan menyebutkan adanya masalah tata kelola dan korupsi dalam industri pertahanan yang berdampak langsung pada kesiapan kendaraan tempur.
3. Kelemahan Teknis pada Model Utama (Studi Kasus: AV8 Gempita)
AV8 Gempita adalah andalan utama kendaraan lapis baja Malondesh. Meskipun merupakan produk lokal yang dikembangkan dari platform FNSS Pars Turki, kendaraan ini juga memiliki beberapa kelemahan:
• Penurunan Kemampuan Amfibi: Varian-varian yang memiliki berat lebih besar, seperti varian antitank dengan turret LCT30, kehilangan kemampuan amfibinya. Hal ini membatasi fleksibilitas operasional kendaraan di medan dengan banyak sungai atau perairan. Bahkan pada varian yang dirancang untuk amfibi, penambahan lapisan pelindung membuat kecepatannya di air menurun.
• Perlindungan yang Memadai Namun Tidak Unggul: Kendaraan lapis baja seperti Tarantula HMAV dan AV8 Gempita dirancang dengan standar perlindungan NATO STANAG 4569. Namun, tingkat perlindungan ini (level 2A/2B) dianggap memadai untuk ancaman ranjau dan IED, tetapi mungkin tidak cukup untuk menghadapi serangan anti-tank atau ancaman yang lebih berat dari kendaraan lapis baja modern lainnya.
• Persenjataan dan Varian yang Berbeda: Meskipun memiliki banyak varian, ada masalah dengan sistem senjata yang digunakan. Sebagai contoh, varian antitank AV8 Gempita dengan rudal anti-tank belum terbukti sepenuhnya efektif atau tersedia dalam jumlah yang cukup.
Secara keseluruhan, kelemahan kendaraan lapis baja militer Malondesh berpusat pada masalah manajemen dan logistik yang kronis, yang menyebabkan armada mereka tidak terawat dan seringkali tidak siap untuk operasi. Selain itu, jumlahnya yang terbatas dan ketergantungan pada model lama membuat kekuatan darat Malondesh tertinggal dibandingkan dengan tetangga regional mereka yang melakukan modernisasi lebih cepat.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
SYSTEMIC ISSUES
HapusSeveral factors contribute to this entrenched problem:
• Lack of Transparency and Oversight: Defense procurement is often conducted through direct negotiations rather than open tenders, which makes the process opaque and susceptible to abuse. Transparency International's Government Defence Integrity Index has consistently rated Malondesh as having a high risk of corruption in its defense sector due to weak parliamentary oversight and limited financial scrutiny.
• The Role of Middlemen and Agents: A key feature of the Malondeshn system is the reliance on middlemen, or "agents," who are often politically connected. These individuals or firms insert themselves into deals between the government and foreign arms manufacturers, adding unnecessary commissions and inflating the final price of the assets. As Malondesh's King Sultan Ibrahim recently pointed out, this system allows agents to profit at the expense of national defense.
• Political Influence and Cronyism: The awarding of contracts is frequently influenced by political interests rather than the actual needs of the military. Projects are often given to politically connected firms, some of which have no prior experience in defense manufacturing. This leads to a vicious cycle where a lack of capability and experience results in project delays and failures.
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal: A Case Study
The LCS scandal is a prime example of the deep-seated issues within Malondeshn defense procurement. The project, intended to build six ships for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) at a cost of RM9 billion, has been a complete failure.
• Misappropriation of Funds: The government has already paid over RM6 billion, but not a single ship has been delivered. Forensic audits and a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report revealed that funds were allegedly misappropriated, with payments made for "fake services" and a significant portion of the money disappearing without a trace.
• Ignoring User Needs: The scandal also highlighted a critical breakdown in communication and a disregard for military expertise. The RMN initially recommended a Dutch-made design (Sigma class), but the Ministry of Defence, under the advice of the main contractor, Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), chose a different, unproven French design (Gowind class) instead. This decision was made without the navy's consultation.
• Gross Inefficiency and Delays: The project has been plagued by delays due to BNS's poor financial management, lack of skilled labor, and failure to follow design specifications. The company, which is a subsidiary of a conglomerate with close ties to the Armed Forces Pension Fund, was in a "weak and critical" financial state, yet was still awarded the massive contract. This showcases a complete breakdown of due diligence and project management.
Other Notable Scandals and Issues
The LCS scandal is just one of many that have plagued the MAF.
• Submarine Procurement: A previous submarine deal was also marred by allegations of corruption, with reports of exorbitant commissions paid to local agents.
• Aircraft and Patrol Boats: The MAF has a history of acquiring assets that are either not fully operational upon delivery or are poorly maintained due to a lack of spare parts and technical expertise. This has led to a high number of non-flying aircraft and inoperable patrol boats, essentially leaving the military with expensive, but useless, equipment.
• Lack of Accountability: Despite multiple scandals and reports from the Auditor-General and PAC, there has been a notable lack of accountability. Few, if any, senior politicians or high-ranking military officials have been held responsible for the failures and financial losses. This has fostered a culture where such misconduct is tolerated, and a cynical public has grown desensitized to the issue.
The Malondeshn military, also known as the Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), faces several significant challenges, which can be categorized into three main areas: procurement and modernization, human resources, and defense policy.
HapusProcurement and Modernization ð°
A primary issue for the MAF is its aging and obsolete equipment. The country's defense spending has historically been low, and while recent budgets have seen increases, they are often insufficient to cover the extensive modernization needs.
• Financial Constraints: The 1997 Asian financial crisis had a lasting impact, forcing a de-prioritization of defense spending. Despite recent budget increases, competing priorities like healthcare and education often limit the funds available for military upgrades.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Past procurement projects, such as the Littoral Combat Ship program, have been plagued by delays, cost overruns, and allegations of corruption, which have wasted funds and resulted in a lack of operational assets.
• Aging Inventory: The MAF relies on a mix of equipment from various countries, making maintenance difficult. For example, the Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF) has struggled to maintain its Russian-made Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets due to sanctions and a lack of spare parts. The country also retired its MiG-29s without a timely replacement, creating a significant capability gap.
Human Resources ð§
Recruitment and personnel issues are another major problem for the MAF, affecting its overall readiness and capability.
• Recruitment Challenges: The military has difficulty attracting and retaining high-quality personnel. This is partly due to low wages and poor living conditions. The quality of candidates has been a concern, with a declining pool of eligible recruits.
• Ethnic Imbalance: There is a significant ethnic disparity in the armed forces, with a very low percentage of non-Malay recruits. This could affect national unity and the military's ability to represent the country's diverse population.
• Personnel Well-being: There are ongoing concerns about the well-being and welfare of military personnel, including work-life balance issues and the need for better mental health support.
Defense Policy and Strategic Challenges ðš️
The MAF operates in a complex regional environment with evolving security threats.
• South China Sea Disputes: Malondesh has overlapping territorial claims with China in the South China Sea. China's increasingly aggressive "grey-zone" tactics—using coast guard vessels and fishing militia to assert its claims—are a major challenge that the MAF is not fully equipped to handle.
• Non-Traditional Threats: While traditionally an army-centric force due to a history of internal counter-insurgency, the MAF must now pivot to address maritime and cyber threats. This requires a re-calibration of its force structure and a focus on new technologies like drones, cyber warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.
• Political Instability: Frequent changes in government have led to a lack of continuity in defense policy and the slow implementation of key reforms outlined in the country's first Defence White Paper. This political instability can stall long-term projects and strategic planning.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
The Malondeshn military, also known as the Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), faces several significant challenges, which can be categorized into three main areas: procurement and modernization, human resources, and defense policy.
HapusProcurement and Modernization ð°
A primary issue for the MAF is its aging and obsolete equipment. The country's defense spending has historically been low, and while recent budgets have seen increases, they are often insufficient to cover the extensive modernization needs.
• Financial Constraints: The 1997 Asian financial crisis had a lasting impact, forcing a de-prioritization of defense spending. Despite recent budget increases, competing priorities like healthcare and education often limit the funds available for military upgrades.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Past procurement projects, such as the Littoral Combat Ship program, have been plagued by delays, cost overruns, and allegations of corruption, which have wasted funds and resulted in a lack of operational assets.
• Aging Inventory: The MAF relies on a mix of equipment from various countries, making maintenance difficult. For example, the Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF) has struggled to maintain its Russian-made Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets due to sanctions and a lack of spare parts. The country also retired its MiG-29s without a timely replacement, creating a significant capability gap.
Human Resources ð§
Recruitment and personnel issues are another major problem for the MAF, affecting its overall readiness and capability.
• Recruitment Challenges: The military has difficulty attracting and retaining high-quality personnel. This is partly due to low wages and poor living conditions. The quality of candidates has been a concern, with a declining pool of eligible recruits.
• Ethnic Imbalance: There is a significant ethnic disparity in the armed forces, with a very low percentage of non-Malay recruits. This could affect national unity and the military's ability to represent the country's diverse population.
• Personnel Well-being: There are ongoing concerns about the well-being and welfare of military personnel, including work-life balance issues and the need for better mental health support.
Defense Policy and Strategic Challenges ðš️
The MAF operates in a complex regional environment with evolving security threats.
• South China Sea Disputes: Malondesh has overlapping territorial claims with China in the South China Sea. China's increasingly aggressive "grey-zone" tactics—using coast guard vessels and fishing militia to assert its claims—are a major challenge that the MAF is not fully equipped to handle.
• Non-Traditional Threats: While traditionally an army-centric force due to a history of internal counter-insurgency, the MAF must now pivot to address maritime and cyber threats. This requires a re-calibration of its force structure and a focus on new technologies like drones, cyber warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.
• Political Instability: Frequent changes in government have led to a lack of continuity in defense policy and the slow implementation of key reforms outlined in the country's first Defence White Paper. This political instability can stall long-term projects and strategic planning.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
⚓ NAVAL WEAKNESS
HapusMALONDESH FACES SERIOUS MARITIME SECURITY CHALLENGES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA AND STRAIT OF MALACCA, BUT ITS NAVY (RMN) IS UNDER-EQUIPPED.
Current Situation
• Major combatants:
o 2 Lekiu-class frigates (1990s).
o 2 Kasturi-class corvettes (1980s).
o 6 Kedah-class offshore patrol vessels (OPVs) — lightly armed.
• Submarines: Only 2 ScorpÃĻne-class (delivered 2009).
• Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program: RM 9 billion spent since 2011, but 0 ships delivered as of 2025 due to corruption scandal.
• Patrol assets: Insufficient to cover Malondesh’s huge EEZ (exclusive economic zone).
Problems
• Aging fleet; many ships near obsolescence.
• Insufficient firepower against regional navies.
• Small submarine force with limited availability.
• LCS scandal delayed modernization by more than a decade.
Regional Comparison
• Singapore: Formidable-class stealth frigates, modern OPVs, strong missile capability, and expanding submarine fleet.
• Indonesia: Expanding fleet with SIGMA-class frigates, Nagapasa submarines, and new OPVs.
• Vietnam: 6 modern Kilo-class submarines from Russia + upgraded frigates.
• China (in South China Sea): Deploys coast guard and navy ships near Malondesh’s EEZ regularly.
ð Malondesh’s Risk: Cannot effectively protect its EEZ against Chinese incursions, illegal fishing, or smuggling. Lacks deterrence against neighbors with stronger navies.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
ðŠ ARMY GAPS
THE MALONDESHN ARMY REMAINS HEAVILY MANPOWER-BASED BUT LACKS MODERN HEAVY FIREPOWER AND AIR DEFENSE.
Current Situation
• Armored vehicles:
o Still uses Condor APCs (1980s).
o AV8 Gempita (modern, joint Malondeshn-Turkish design) introduced but in limited numbers.
• Artillery: Mix of old towed guns and some self-propelled howitzers; lacks long-range precision systems.
• Air defense:
o Only short-range MANPADS (Igla, Starstreak).
o No medium or long-range SAMs (surface-to-air missiles).
• Helicopters: Slow delivery of light attack helicopters (MD530G).
Problems
• Army lacks modern combined-arms capability (armor + artillery + air defense).
• Vulnerable to airstrikes, drones, and missile attacks because of weak air defense.
• Heavy reliance on light infantry → good for counterinsurgency, weak in high-intensity warfare.
Regional Comparison
• Singapore: Fully mechanized army with Leopard 2 tanks, modern artillery, HIMARS rocket systems, and I-Hawk SAMs.
• Indonesia: Leopard 2 tanks, CAESAR howitzers, NASAMS air defense.
• Thailand: VT-4 tanks from China, Gripen air cover, strong artillery.
ð Malondesh’s Risk: In a conventional war, the Malondeshn Army could not sustain modern combined-arms warfare and would rely on defensive, guerrilla-style tactics.
Adoiimakk
BalasHapushttps://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033770728-750x430.jpg
https://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033767976.jpg
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
SYSTEMIC ISSUES
HapusSeveral factors contribute to this entrenched problem:
• Lack of Transparency and Oversight: Defense procurement is often conducted through direct negotiations rather than open tenders, which makes the process opaque and susceptible to abuse. Transparency International's Government Defence Integrity Index has consistently rated Malondesh as having a high risk of corruption in its defense sector due to weak parliamentary oversight and limited financial scrutiny.
• The Role of Middlemen and Agents: A key feature of the Malondeshn system is the reliance on middlemen, or "agents," who are often politically connected. These individuals or firms insert themselves into deals between the government and foreign arms manufacturers, adding unnecessary commissions and inflating the final price of the assets. As Malondesh's King Sultan Ibrahim recently pointed out, this system allows agents to profit at the expense of national defense.
• Political Influence and Cronyism: The awarding of contracts is frequently influenced by political interests rather than the actual needs of the military. Projects are often given to politically connected firms, some of which have no prior experience in defense manufacturing. This leads to a vicious cycle where a lack of capability and experience results in project delays and failures.
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal: A Case Study
The LCS scandal is a prime example of the deep-seated issues within Malondeshn defense procurement. The project, intended to build six ships for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) at a cost of RM9 billion, has been a complete failure.
• Misappropriation of Funds: The government has already paid over RM6 billion, but not a single ship has been delivered. Forensic audits and a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report revealed that funds were allegedly misappropriated, with payments made for "fake services" and a significant portion of the money disappearing without a trace.
• Ignoring User Needs: The scandal also highlighted a critical breakdown in communication and a disregard for military expertise. The RMN initially recommended a Dutch-made design (Sigma class), but the Ministry of Defence, under the advice of the main contractor, Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), chose a different, unproven French design (Gowind class) instead. This decision was made without the navy's consultation.
• Gross Inefficiency and Delays: The project has been plagued by delays due to BNS's poor financial management, lack of skilled labor, and failure to follow design specifications. The company, which is a subsidiary of a conglomerate with close ties to the Armed Forces Pension Fund, was in a "weak and critical" financial state, yet was still awarded the massive contract. This showcases a complete breakdown of due diligence and project management.
Other Notable Scandals and Issues
The LCS scandal is just one of many that have plagued the MAF.
• Submarine Procurement: A previous submarine deal was also marred by allegations of corruption, with reports of exorbitant commissions paid to local agents.
• Aircraft and Patrol Boats: The MAF has a history of acquiring assets that are either not fully operational upon delivery or are poorly maintained due to a lack of spare parts and technical expertise. This has led to a high number of non-flying aircraft and inoperable patrol boats, essentially leaving the military with expensive, but useless, equipment.
• Lack of Accountability: Despite multiple scandals and reports from the Auditor-General and PAC, there has been a notable lack of accountability. Few, if any, senior politicians or high-ranking military officials have been held responsible for the failures and financial losses. This has fostered a culture where such misconduct is tolerated, and a cynical public has grown desensitized to the issue.
THE MALONDESH MILITARY HAS A SIGNIFICANT CAPABILITY GAP IN ITS COUNTER-INSURGENCY (COIN) AIRCRAFT FLEET, PRIMARILY DUE TO THE AGING AND LIMITED NUMBER OF LIGHT COMBAT AND SURVEILLANCE PLATFORMS SUITABLE FOR THIS TYPE OF ASYMMETRIC WARFARE.
Hapus1. Lack of Dedicated COIN Aircraft
Unlike a dedicated air force built for large-scale conventional warfare, a successful COIN force requires aircraft optimized for a unique set of missions:
• Low and Slow: COIN operations often occur in dense jungle or urban environments where fast jets are ineffective. They require aircraft that can fly low and slow to provide close air support and accurate surveillance.
• Persistent Presence: COIN aircraft must be able to loiter for extended periods to track insurgents and provide sustained support to ground troops.
• Cost-Effectiveness: Using expensive, high-performance fighter jets like the Su-30MKM for COIN missions is a significant waste of resources.
The Royal MalondeshAir Force (RMAF) lacks a dedicated fleet of such aircraft. Its existing fleet is more suited for air defense and conventional warfare, creating a mismatch between its capabilities and the specific demands of counter-insurgency.
________________________________________
2. Aging Fleet and Reliance on Other Assets
The RMAF's current inventory is not well-suited for the COIN role, forcing it to rely on a mix of aging platforms and less-than-ideal helicopters.
• Retired Aircraft: The RMAF has retired dedicated COIN aircraft like the Canadair CT-114 Tutor. This leaves a major gap that has not been adequately filled.
• Helicopter Gaps: While the Army operates light attack helicopters like the MD530G, these are limited in their range, endurance, and payload. This places a heavy burden on a small fleet to support ground forces over vast and often difficult terrain.
________________________________________
3. Delays in New Acquisitions
Malondeshis actively trying to address this gap, but procurement has been slow and challenging.
• FA-50M Purchase: The RMAF is acquiring 18 FA-50M light combat aircraft from Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI). These jets are intended to fulfill both a fighter lead-in trainer role and a light combat role. However, deliveries are not expected to begin until 2026. This leaves the RMAF with a capability gap in the interim.
• Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Malondeshhas made some progress in acquiring drones for surveillance, but these still do not fully replace the role of a manned COIN aircraft, which can provide more direct and immediate fire support.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
THE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SEVERAL CRUCIAL, INTERRELATED PROBLEMS THAT AFFECT ITS OVERALL READINESS AND CAPABILITY. THESE ISSUES STEM FROM A COMBINATION OF CHRONIC UNDERFUNDING, A COMPLICATED PROCUREMENT PROCESS, AND A FRAGMENTED APPROACH TO MILITARY DEVELOPMENT.
Hapus1. Inefficient and Opaque Procurement
The most significant problem facing the Malondesh military is its procurement system. It's often criticized for a lack of transparency and a reliance on middlemen or agents, which leads to inflated prices and projects that fail to meet the military's actual needs.
• Cost Overruns and Delays: Projects, most notably the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, have been plagued by severe delays and massive cost overruns. None of the six ships have been delivered, despite significant payments. This has left the Royal Malondesh Navy (RMN) with an aging fleet, as many of its vessels are over 40 years old.
• "Middlemen" and Corruption: King Sultan Ibrahim has publicly criticized the involvement of agents and salesmen in defense deals, stating that these practices lead to "unreasonable" prices and purchases that don't fit the military's needs. This has raised concerns about corruption and inefficiency within the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF).
________________________________________
2. An Aging Fleet and Logistical Challenges
The Malondesh Armed Forces (MAF) operates a mixed fleet of military assets from a wide range of international suppliers. This lack of standardization creates a logistical nightmare.
• Fragmentation of Supply Chains: The military has equipment from various countries, including Russia, the United States, Poland, and China. Each platform requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Low Operational Readiness: Many of the Navy's vessels and Air Force's combat jets are well past their service life, leading to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational readiness rate.
• Reliance on Foreign Support: Due to a lack of local expertise, Malondesh is highly dependent on foreign suppliers for critical maintenance and spare parts, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions, such as international sanctions.
________________________________________
3. Capability Gaps and Lack of Specialization
The MAF has key capability gaps in crucial areas due to its historical focus on counter-insurgency and a lack of a unified doctrine.
• No Dedicated Marine Corps: Malondesh lacks a dedicated Marine Corps. Its amphibious capabilities are fragmented and distributed between the Army and Navy. This creates coordination problems and limits the ability to rapidly project power and respond to maritime threats, a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic nation.
• Limited Tank Fleet: The Army's tank force is limited to approximately 48 PT-91M Pendekar tanks. This small number restricts their strategic deployment and makes them less effective in a large-scale land conflict compared to neighbors with larger tank fleets.
• COIN Aircraft Gap: The Air Force lacks a dedicated fleet of Counter-Insurgency (COIN) aircraft. It's forced to use expensive multi-role fighter jets for low-intensity conflicts, which is inefficient. While a new batch of FA-50M light combat aircraft is on order, deliveries are not expected for several years.
THE MALONDESH MILITARY FACES SEVERAL CRUCIAL, INTERRELATED PROBLEMS THAT AFFECT ITS OVERALL READINESS AND CAPABILITY. THESE ISSUES STEM FROM A COMBINATION OF CHRONIC UNDERFUNDING, A COMPLICATED PROCUREMENT PROCESS, AND A FRAGMENTED APPROACH TO MILITARY DEVELOPMENT.
Hapus1. Inefficient and Opaque Procurement
The most significant problem facing the Malondesh military is its procurement system. It's often criticized for a lack of transparency and a reliance on middlemen or agents, which leads to inflated prices and projects that fail to meet the military's actual needs.
• Cost Overruns and Delays: Projects, most notably the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program, have been plagued by severe delays and massive cost overruns. None of the six ships have been delivered, despite significant payments. This has left the Royal Malondesh Navy (RMN) with an aging fleet, as many of its vessels are over 40 years old.
• "Middlemen" and Corruption: King Sultan Ibrahim has publicly criticized the involvement of agents and salesmen in defense deals, stating that these practices lead to "unreasonable" prices and purchases that don't fit the military's needs. This has raised concerns about corruption and inefficiency within the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF).
________________________________________
2. An Aging Fleet and Logistical Challenges
The Malondesh Armed Forces (MAF) operates a mixed fleet of military assets from a wide range of international suppliers. This lack of standardization creates a logistical nightmare.
• Fragmentation of Supply Chains: The military has equipment from various countries, including Russia, the United States, Poland, and China. Each platform requires different spare parts, tools, and maintenance expertise.
• Low Operational Readiness: Many of the Navy's vessels and Air Force's combat jets are well past their service life, leading to higher maintenance costs and a lower operational readiness rate.
• Reliance on Foreign Support: Due to a lack of local expertise, Malondesh is highly dependent on foreign suppliers for critical maintenance and spare parts, making the military vulnerable to supply chain disruptions, such as international sanctions.
________________________________________
3. Capability Gaps and Lack of Specialization
The MAF has key capability gaps in crucial areas due to its historical focus on counter-insurgency and a lack of a unified doctrine.
• No Dedicated Marine Corps: Malondesh lacks a dedicated Marine Corps. Its amphibious capabilities are fragmented and distributed between the Army and Navy. This creates coordination problems and limits the ability to rapidly project power and respond to maritime threats, a significant vulnerability for an archipelagic nation.
• Limited Tank Fleet: The Army's tank force is limited to approximately 48 PT-91M Pendekar tanks. This small number restricts their strategic deployment and makes them less effective in a large-scale land conflict compared to neighbors with larger tank fleets.
• COIN Aircraft Gap: The Air Force lacks a dedicated fleet of Counter-Insurgency (COIN) aircraft. It's forced to use expensive multi-role fighter jets for low-intensity conflicts, which is inefficient. While a new batch of FA-50M light combat aircraft is on order, deliveries are not expected for several years.
⚓ NAVAL WEAKNESS
HapusMALONDESH FACES SERIOUS MARITIME SECURITY CHALLENGES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA AND STRAIT OF MALACCA, BUT ITS NAVY (RMN) IS UNDER-EQUIPPED.
Current Situation
• Major combatants:
o 2 Lekiu-class frigates (1990s).
o 2 Kasturi-class corvettes (1980s).
o 6 Kedah-class offshore patrol vessels (OPVs) — lightly armed.
• Submarines: Only 2 ScorpÃĻne-class (delivered 2009).
• Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program: RM 9 billion spent since 2011, but 0 ships delivered as of 2025 due to corruption scandal.
• Patrol assets: Insufficient to cover Malondesh’s huge EEZ (exclusive economic zone).
Problems
• Aging fleet; many ships near obsolescence.
• Insufficient firepower against regional navies.
• Small submarine force with limited availability.
• LCS scandal delayed modernization by more than a decade.
Regional Comparison
• Singapore: Formidable-class stealth frigates, modern OPVs, strong missile capability, and expanding submarine fleet.
• Indonesia: Expanding fleet with SIGMA-class frigates, Nagapasa submarines, and new OPVs.
• Vietnam: 6 modern Kilo-class submarines from Russia + upgraded frigates.
• China (in South China Sea): Deploys coast guard and navy ships near Malondesh’s EEZ regularly.
ð Malondesh’s Risk: Cannot effectively protect its EEZ against Chinese incursions, illegal fishing, or smuggling. Lacks deterrence against neighbors with stronger navies.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
59. Salam dapat Sedekah kapal rongsok 56 tahun ex USCG Cutter
Adoiimakk
BalasHapushttps://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033770728-750x430.jpg
https://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033767976.jpg
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
1. FINANCIAL AND BUDGETARY REASONS
HapusOne of the most common reasons for cancellation is a lack of funds. The Malondeshn defense budget has historically been inconsistent and insufficient to support major, multi-year projects. When budgets are cut or not allocated as planned, the military is forced to scrap projects it can no longer afford.
• Impact on Acquisitions: This has led to the cancellation of proposed acquisitions, such as the plan to buy Kuwait's F/A-18C/D Hornet fighter jets. The decision was based on concerns about the high costs of upgrading and integrating the older jets, which were deemed to not provide sufficient "value for money."
• Inability to Pay: In some cases, the government or contractors may simply lack the funds to continue a project. This was a contributing factor to the failures of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, where a contractor struggled with financial solvency.
________________________________________
2. Poor Governance and Lack of Transparency
Many cancellations stem from fundamental issues in how contracts are awarded and managed.
• Direct Negotiation vs. Open Tenders: The use of direct negotiation instead of open tenders is a major weakness. It limits competition and can result in contracts being awarded to politically connected companies, even if they lack the expertise or financial capability to complete the project.
• Mismanagement and Corruption: Projects are often canceled due to evidence of financial mismanagement, overspending, or corruption. The LCS scandal is the most infamous example, where a parliamentary inquiry found evidence of funds being misused and payments made to unverified subcontractors.
________________________________________
3. Lack of Operational Feasibility
Sometimes, a project is canceled because the proposed asset is not suitable for the military's needs or poses a risk to personnel.
• Obsolete Technology: The recent cancellation of the deal to lease four Black Hawk helicopters is a clear example. Malondesh King Sultan Ibrahim ordered the deal to be scrapped, publicly criticizing the acquisition of old, over 30-year-old aircraft that he called "flying coffins." He noted that such acquisitions endanger the lives of pilots and do not provide the military with a necessary capability.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. FINANCIAL AND BUDGETARY REASONS
HapusOne of the most common reasons for cancellation is a lack of funds. The Malondeshn defense budget has historically been inconsistent and insufficient to support major, multi-year projects. When budgets are cut or not allocated as planned, the military is forced to scrap projects it can no longer afford.
• Impact on Acquisitions: This has led to the cancellation of proposed acquisitions, such as the plan to buy Kuwait's F/A-18C/D Hornet fighter jets. The decision was based on concerns about the high costs of upgrading and integrating the older jets, which were deemed to not provide sufficient "value for money."
• Inability to Pay: In some cases, the government or contractors may simply lack the funds to continue a project. This was a contributing factor to the failures of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, where a contractor struggled with financial solvency.
________________________________________
2. Poor Governance and Lack of Transparency
Many cancellations stem from fundamental issues in how contracts are awarded and managed.
• Direct Negotiation vs. Open Tenders: The use of direct negotiation instead of open tenders is a major weakness. It limits competition and can result in contracts being awarded to politically connected companies, even if they lack the expertise or financial capability to complete the project.
• Mismanagement and Corruption: Projects are often canceled due to evidence of financial mismanagement, overspending, or corruption. The LCS scandal is the most infamous example, where a parliamentary inquiry found evidence of funds being misused and payments made to unverified subcontractors.
________________________________________
3. Lack of Operational Feasibility
Sometimes, a project is canceled because the proposed asset is not suitable for the military's needs or poses a risk to personnel.
• Obsolete Technology: The recent cancellation of the deal to lease four Black Hawk helicopters is a clear example. Malondesh King Sultan Ibrahim ordered the deal to be scrapped, publicly criticizing the acquisition of old, over 30-year-old aircraft that he called "flying coffins." He noted that such acquisitions endanger the lives of pilots and do not provide the military with a necessary capability.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. FINANCIAL AND BUDGETARY REASONS
HapusOne of the most common reasons for cancellation is a lack of funds. The Malondeshn defense budget has historically been inconsistent and insufficient to support major, multi-year projects. When budgets are cut or not allocated as planned, the military is forced to scrap projects it can no longer afford.
• Impact on Acquisitions: This has led to the cancellation of proposed acquisitions, such as the plan to buy Kuwait's F/A-18C/D Hornet fighter jets. The decision was based on concerns about the high costs of upgrading and integrating the older jets, which were deemed to not provide sufficient "value for money."
• Inability to Pay: In some cases, the government or contractors may simply lack the funds to continue a project. This was a contributing factor to the failures of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project, where a contractor struggled with financial solvency.
________________________________________
2. Poor Governance and Lack of Transparency
Many cancellations stem from fundamental issues in how contracts are awarded and managed.
• Direct Negotiation vs. Open Tenders: The use of direct negotiation instead of open tenders is a major weakness. It limits competition and can result in contracts being awarded to politically connected companies, even if they lack the expertise or financial capability to complete the project.
• Mismanagement and Corruption: Projects are often canceled due to evidence of financial mismanagement, overspending, or corruption. The LCS scandal is the most infamous example, where a parliamentary inquiry found evidence of funds being misused and payments made to unverified subcontractors.
________________________________________
3. Lack of Operational Feasibility
Sometimes, a project is canceled because the proposed asset is not suitable for the military's needs or poses a risk to personnel.
• Obsolete Technology: The recent cancellation of the deal to lease four Black Hawk helicopters is a clear example. Malondesh King Sultan Ibrahim ordered the deal to be scrapped, publicly criticizing the acquisition of old, over 30-year-old aircraft that he called "flying coffins." He noted that such acquisitions endanger the lives of pilots and do not provide the military with a necessary capability.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. AGING AND OBSOLETE FLEET
HapusA large portion of the RMAF's aircraft is old, with some models in service for several decades. This has created a fleet with a high average age, leading to a number of critical problems:
• High Maintenance Costs: Keeping an aging fleet airworthy is expensive. Older aircraft require more frequent and specialized maintenance, consuming a large part of the RMAF's operating budget that could otherwise be used for modernization.
• Low Operational Readiness: Due to frequent technical issues and the unavailability of spare parts, many aircraft have low readiness rates and spend significant time on the ground. This severely limits the RMAF's capacity to conduct regular training and respond to threats effectively.
• Corrosion Issues: Operating in Malondesh's hot and humid tropical environment, with coastal bases, accelerates corrosion in the aluminum structures of older aircraft. This can lead to metal fatigue and structural failures, raising serious safety concerns for pilots and crew.
• Technological Obsolescence: Many older aircraft lack the modern avionics, weapon systems, and networking capabilities needed for contemporary air combat. This puts the RMAF at a disadvantage against more technologically advanced air forces in the region.
________________________________________
2. Budgetary Constraints and Slow Modernization
The RMAF's modernization efforts have been consistently hampered by a limited and inconsistent defense budget.
• Insufficient Funding: The budget allocated for military development is often insufficient to fund major, large-scale acquisitions. This forces the RMAF to adopt a piecemeal approach to modernization, acquiring a small number of new platforms at a time.
• Delayed Plans: Key acquisition programs, such as the procurement of new Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) and Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA), have been repeatedly delayed or scaled back due to a lack of funds.
________________________________________
3. Inefficient Procurement Process
The process of acquiring new military assets is a major weakness, often criticized for being slow, opaque, and inefficient.
• Lack of Transparency: Procurement is frequently conducted through direct negotiation rather than open tenders, which can lead to inflated prices and a lack of accountability.
• Role of Intermediaries: The involvement of middlemen or agents in defense deals can drive up costs significantly, wasting public funds and sometimes resulting in the acquisition of unsuitable equipment.
• Project Delays: These issues have led to numerous project failures and delays, leaving the RMAF's fleet in a state of limbo and undermining its long-term strategic plans.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. CELAH KEMAMPUAN (CAPABILITY GAP)
HapusIni adalah masalah yang paling mendesak, terutama jika dibandingkan dengan negara-negara tetangga seperti Singapura dan Indonesia yang terus memodernisasi angkatan bersenjata mereka.
• Angkatan Udara yang Melemah: Angkatan Udara Kerajaan Malondesh (TUDM) menghadapi tantangan terbesar. Dengan pensiunnya jet tempur MiG-29, TUDM memiliki celah yang signifikan dalam kekuatan tempur multi-peran. Meskipun mereka sedang dalam proses mengakuisisi pesawat ringan seperti FA-50, hal ini tidak sepenuhnya bisa menggantikan peran jet tempur berat. Selain itu, masalah pemeliharaan dan ketersediaan suku cadang untuk jet tempur Sukhoi Su-30MKM yang sudah ada juga menjadi masalah kronis.
• Kesenjangan Armada Laut: Angkatan Laut Kerajaan Malondesh (TLDM) menghadapi dua masalah besar:
o Kapal Tua: Banyak kapal perang TLDM sudah sangat tua, dengan usia rata-rata melebihi 30 tahun. Ini membuat biaya perawatan menjadi sangat tinggi dan menurunkan kesiapan operasional.
o Skandal LCS: Proyek kapal tempur pesisir (LCS) yang sarat korupsi telah menelan miliaran ringgit tanpa menghasilkan satu pun kapal yang siap beroperasi. Ini menciptakan celah besar dalam kekuatan maritim dan merusak kepercayaan publik serta kredibilitas industri pertahanan Malondesh.
• Peralatan Darat yang Kurang Canggih: Meskipun ada upaya modernisasi, Angkatan Darat Malondesh masih mengandalkan sebagian besar peralatan lama. Tank PT-91M Pendekar, yang merupakan aset utama, seringkali mengalami masalah teknis dan ketersediaan suku cadang.
2. Celah Anggaran dan Kebijakan (Budget and Policy Gap)
Meskipun anggaran pertahanan telah meningkat, masih ada ketidaksesuaian antara alokasi dana dan kebutuhan nyata.
• Prioritas yang Berubah-ubah: Pemerintah Malondesh sering kali mengalihkan prioritas anggaran, terutama di masa kesulitan ekonomi. Ini menyebabkan proyek modernisasi militer yang sudah direncanakan berulang kali ditunda atau dibatalkan.
• Kurangnya Transparansi: Pengadaan militer sering dilakukan di balik layar (direct negotiation), yang membuka celah besar untuk korupsi dan inefisiensi. Hal ini tidak hanya membuang anggaran, tetapi juga mengakibatkan keterlambatan proyek dan akuisisi peralatan yang tidak sesuai dengan kebutuhan militer.
3. Celah Teknis dan Industri (Technology and Industry Gap)
• Ketergantungan pada Impor: Malondesh masih sangat bergantung pada produsen asing untuk peralatan pertahanan canggih. Kurangnya kapabilitas industri pertahanan dalam negeri untuk memproduksi dan memelihara aset-aset kunci membuat militer rentan terhadap fluktuasi pasokan dan perubahan kebijakan dari negara produsen.
• Keterlambatan dalam Teknologi Baru: Sambil negara lain berinvestasi besar-besaran dalam teknologi perang modern seperti drone, kecerdasan buatan (AI), dan perang siber, Malondesh tertinggal dalam adopsi teknologi ini. Meskipun ada inisiatif untuk mengakuisisi drone Anka-S dari Turki, langkah ini masih terbilang lambat dibandingkan dengan kecepatan modernisasi militer di kawasan.
4. Celah Sumber Daya Manusia (Human Resources Gap)
• Kualitas dan Retensi Personel: Militer Malondesh menghadapi tantangan dalam menarik dan mempertahankan personel berkualitas tinggi. Gaji yang relatif rendah dan kondisi kerja yang kurang memadai seringkali menjadi faktor penghambat. Hal ini berdampak pada kemampuan militer untuk mengoperasikan dan memelihara peralatan canggih.
• Keterbatasan Pelatihan: Dengan terbatasnya anggaran dan peralatan yang tidak siap operasional, militer sering kali tidak dapat melakukan latihan yang memadai dan realistis. Ini membatasi pengalaman dan kesiapan tempur personel.
Secara ringkas, celah terbesar dalam modernisasi militer Malondesh adalah antara apa yang seharusnya mereka miliki untuk menghadapi ancaman modern dan apa yang benar-benar mereka miliki. Ini adalah siklus yang kompleks dari masalah keuangan, kebijakan yang tidak konsisten, kurangnya industri dalam negeri yang kuat, dan masalah korupsi yang merusak semua upaya untuk memodernisasi angkatan bersenjata.
ð° MIDDLEMEN & COMMISSIONS IN MALONDESHN Armed Forces Procurement
Hapus1. What Are Middlemen in Defense Deals?
• In defense procurement, middlemen (sometimes called agents, consultants, or brokers) act as intermediaries between the Malondeshn government/military and foreign defense suppliers (e.g., shipbuilders, aircraft manufacturers, arms companies).
• In theory, they are supposed to:
o Facilitate negotiations.
o Provide local expertise.
o Smoothen bureaucracy.
• In practice, they often inflate costs, demand commissions, and channel kickbacks to political figures or officials.
________________________________________
2. How Middlemen Work in Malondeshn Defense Procurement
1. Foreign Supplier → Local Agent
o A foreign company selling jets, submarines, or ships is required (sometimes unofficially) to use a Malondeshn intermediary.
2. Mark-Up & Commission
o The agent adds commission fees (5–15% or more) on top of the real price.
o These inflated costs are hidden under “consultancy services” or “offset agreements.”
3. Kickbacks
o Part of the commission is allegedly funneled to politicians, senior officials, or linked companies to secure the contract.
4. Result
o Malondesh ends up paying far above market price for equipment.
o The military gets fewer assets for the same budget.
________________________________________
3. Examples of Middlemen in Malondeshn Defense Scandals
ðĒ a. The ScorpÃĻne Submarine Deal (2002)
• Malondesh purchased two ScorpÃĻne-class submarines from French company DCNS (now Naval Group) worth about RM 4.3 billion (~USD 1 billion).
• A Malondeshn company, Perimekar Sdn Bhd, acted as the “support services provider.”
• Perimekar received RM 500 million (≈ USD 120 million) in “commissions.”
• French investigations later revealed this was effectively kickbacks disguised as consultancy fees, with allegations that money was funneled to Malondeshn political elites.
Impact: Malondesh got the submarines, but at a heavily inflated price — while international corruption investigations damaged Malondesh reputation.
________________________________________
ðĒ b. The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal (2011–present)
• The RM 9 billion contract to build 6 Gowind-class ships involved subcontracting and changes in design.
• Reports suggest multiple layers of subcontractors and consultants, many linked to politically connected firms.
• Payments were made for “consultancy” and “IT systems” that had little to do with shipbuilding.
• Some of these contracts were allegedly ways to siphon money out of the project.
Impact: Billions spent, zero ships delivered by 2025. The use of middlemen and subcontractors directly contributed to the collapse of the program.
________________________________________
ðĒ c. Fighter Jet & Helicopter Purchases
• Past deals for MiG-29s (1990s), Su-30MKMs (2000s), and helicopters (2010s) also involved agents.
• Allegations:
o Overpricing of spare parts.
o Long-term maintenance contracts given to politically linked firms.
o Kickbacks hidden in “service fees.”
________________________________________
4. Why Middlemen Are a Problem in Malondesh
1. Inflated Costs
o Commissions can push prices 20–30% higher than international norms.
2. Reduced Military Capability
o With the same budget, Malondesh buys fewer ships, jets, or vehicles.
3. Encourages Corruption
o Middlemen often act as money channels for bribes.
4. Weak Accountability
o These commissions are often hidden in classified “national security” budgets, so Parliament and public auditors cannot fully track them.
5. Foreign Dependence
o Malondesh has limited domestic defense industry capacity, making it vulnerable to manipulation by foreign suppliers and local agents.
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
59. Salam dapat Sedekah kapal rongsok 56 tahun ex USCG Cutter
Adoiimakk
BalasHapushttps://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033770728-750x430.jpg
https://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033767976.jpg
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
THE LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) SCANDAL
HapusThe LCS scandal is arguably the most notorious military procurement failure in Malondesh history. It involves a RM9 billion contract to build six stealth frigates for the Royal Malondeshn Navy.
• Project Failure: Despite the government paying over RM6 billion, not a single ship has been delivered, years past the original deadline. A parliamentary report labeled the project a "colossal procurement and governance failure."
• Misappropriation of Funds: A forensic audit revealed that funds were allegedly siphoned off for other purposes, including paying old debts from an unrelated naval project. Payments were also made to dubious companies for services that were never rendered.
• Political Interference: Investigations found that the Ministry of Defence ignored the Royal Malondeshn Navy's choice of ship design, opting instead for a different model recommended by the main contractor. This decision led to a series of technical and design problems.
________________________________________
The Scorpene Submarine Scandal
This scandal dates back to the early 2000s and involves Malondesh purchase of two French-Spanish Scorpene-class submarines for €1.2 billion.
• Suspicious Payments: A central issue was the payment of over €114 million in commissions to a Malondeshn company, Perimekar Sdn Bhd, which was owned by a close associate of the then-Defense Minister, despite having no prior experience in submarine projects.
• Corruption Allegations: French prosecutors investigated allegations that these payments were disguised bribes. The case also gained international notoriety due to its connection to the murder of a Mongolian woman, Altantuya Shaariibuu, who was a translator involved in the deal.
________________________________________
Procurement Irregularities and Financial Mismanagement
Beyond specific scandals, government audit reports and recent events have highlighted systemic weaknesses in military procurement.
• Inefficient Procurement: The Auditor-General's reports have repeatedly exposed major inefficiencies. For example, the government has failed to collect penalties from contractors for major project delays, and has been found to use direct negotiation instead of open tenders, which can lead to inflated prices and a lack of accountability.
• The Black Hawk Helicopter Deal: The King of Malondesh recently intervened to halt a proposal to lease four used Black Hawk helicopters, publicly rebuking the practice of using "agents and salesmen" in military procurement. He criticized the system for favoring politically connected middlemen who inflate prices and compromise the military's actual needs.
These scandals and persistent issues demonstrate a pattern of poor governance and a lack of transparency that have severely undermined the Malondeshn military's capabilities and its credibility with the public
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
Key Issues and Failures
Hapus1. Poor Governance and Lack of Transparency
The contract was awarded to BNS through direct negotiation, bypassing an open tender process. This lack of transparency was a major red flag, as it allowed for decisions to be made without proper scrutiny.
2. Ignoring the End-User's Needs
A parliamentary inquiry revealed that the Ministry of Defence and BNS ignored the RMN's recommendation for a specific ship design (the Sigma class). Instead, they opted for an alternative design (the Gowind class) at the suggestion of BNS, a decision that a former navy chief called "gravely wrong." This change resulted in a series of design and technical problems that contributed to the project's delays.
3. Financial Mismanagement
The scandal was characterized by widespread financial irregularities:
• Misappropriation of Funds: The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) found that around RM1.4 billion from the LCS project funds were used for other purposes, including paying off old debts from a previous, unrelated naval project.
• Dubious Payments: A forensic audit revealed that payments were made to questionable companies for services that were never rendered.
• Weak Contract Terms: Payments were made to the contractor based on a progress schedule rather than on actual work completed, allowing the contractor to receive money for work that was far behind schedule.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
⚔️ Key Problems of the Malondeshn Armed Forces
Hapus________________________________________
1. Outdated Equipment → Modernization Delayed for Decades
• Air Force (RMAF):
o Retired MiG-29s in 2017 due to high costs.
o Current frontline jets: Su-30MKM (2007) and F/A-18D Hornet (1997) — small fleet, aging, and expensive to maintain.
o Still waiting for FA-50 light combat aircraft, deliveries only starting in 2026.
o Weak surveillance capability → lacks modern maritime patrol aircraft and AWACS.
• Navy (RMN):
o Many ships date from the 1980s–90s (Lekiu-class frigates, Kasturi-class corvettes).
o Only 2 ScorpÃĻne submarines, insufficient to cover Malondesh vast waters.
o Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal froze modernization — billions spent, no ships delivered.
• Army:
o Still operates Condor APCs from the 1980s.
o AV8 Gempita is modern but only partially deployed.
o Lacks modern long-range artillery and medium/long-range air defense systems.
Impact: The MAF has been stuck with aging platforms, while neighbors upgrade to Rafales, F-35s, Gripens, modern submarines, and frigates. Malondesh risks being outclassed in any regional confrontation.
________________________________________
2. Low Defense Budget → Insufficient for High-Tech Upgrades
• Malondesh spends only 1.0–1.5% of GDP on defense.
o Singapore spends ~3%, Vietnam ~2.3%, Thailand ~1.5%.
• Of this budget, more than half goes to salaries, pensions, and operations → leaving little for modernization.
• Modern assets (jets, ships, submarines) require long-term investment, but Malondesh often cuts or delays purchases due to economic pressures.
• Example: MRCA fighter program (to replace MiG-29s) has been delayed for over a decade.
Impact: Malondesh cannot keep pace with regional military spending. Modernization becomes piecemeal, leaving gaps in readiness and deterrence.
________________________________________
3. Maritime Security Challenges → China & Piracy Overstretch the Navy
• South China Sea (SCS):
o China’s Coast Guard and Navy frequently intrude into Malondesh EEZ, especially around Luconia Shoals.
o Malondesh has overlapping maritime claims with China, Vietnam, and the Philippines.
• Strait of Malacca:
o One of the busiest shipping lanes in the world.
o Vulnerable to piracy, smuggling, human trafficking, and illegal fishing.
• Navy Limitations:
o Small, aging fleet cannot patrol both SCS and Malacca Strait effectively.
o Relies heavily on offshore patrol vessels (OPVs) that lack strong firepower.
o Only 2 submarines → insufficient deterrent against China or other navies.
Impact: Malondesh struggles to enforce sovereignty over its waters. The Navy is stretched thin, unable to cover vast sea areas against both traditional (China) and non-traditional (piracy) threats.
________________________________________
✅ Summary / Conclusion
The Malondeshn Armed Forces face three interconnected problems:
1. Outdated Equipment: Modernization stalled for decades, leaving MAF dependent on aging jets, ships, and vehicles.
2. Low Defense Budget: Limited funding prevents the acquisition of high-tech assets, keeping Malondesh behind regional peers.
3. Maritime Security Challenges: A small, overstretched Navy struggles to protect Malondesh EEZ in the South China Sea and secure the Strait of Malacca.
ð Conclusion: Unless Malondesh increases defense spending, reforms procurement, and accelerates modernization, the MAF risks becoming a force capable only of low-intensity domestic missions, not one prepared to defend national sovereignty against regional powers like China or match its Southeast Asian neighbors.
Legal Grey Zones in “Offsets” & “Consultancy Fees”
Hapus• Commissions to middlemen are often disguised as:
o Offset programs (e.g., promising technology transfer, training, local jobs).
o Consultancy fees for “facilitating” deals.
o Logistics or IT support contracts.
• These make it appear legitimate on paper, even if the services provided are minimal or irrelevant.
Why it continues: Because the practice can be masked under legal business terms, it becomes difficult to prove corruption.
________________________________________
Institutionalized Culture of Corruption
• In Malondesh, the role of middlemen has been entrenched since the 1980s–1990s when large defense contracts (MiG-29s, patrol boats, submarines) first involved commissions.
• Once established, it became a “standard practice” in defense procurement.
• Military officers are aware of it but cannot override political leaders who approve procurement.
Why it continues: Corruption in procurement has become part of the status quo — changing it would threaten entrenched interests.
________________________________________
Limited Domestic Defense Industry Capacity
• Malondesh does not have a strong indigenous defense industry compared to countries like Singapore.
• This weakness forces Malondesh to import most major weapons (jets, submarines, ships, tanks).
• Because imports are complex, middlemen exploit the situation by presenting themselves as “essential” facilitators.
Why it continues: Without a robust local defense industry, Malondesh depends on foreign deals, which middlemen dominate.
________________________________________
Short-Term Political Gains Over Long-Term Military Needs
• Defense deals are often politically timed (e.g., before elections) to show “progress” in military modernization.
• Politicians prioritize contracts that reward allies or fund political campaigns instead of long-term military requirements.
• Middlemen are crucial to channel funds quickly and quietly.
Why it continues: Political survival often outweighs genuine defense needs.
________________________________________
✅ Summary
Middlemen continue to exist in Malondeshn defense procurement because of:
1. Political patronage → Contracts reward allies.
2. Opaque, secretive procurement → No transparency.
3. Weak oversight → Parliament & auditors lack power.
4. Foreign supplier practices → They accept middlemen as part of the deal.
5. Legal disguise → Commissions hidden as consultancy or offsets.
6. Entrenched corruption culture → Seen as “normal.”
7. Weak local defense industry → Dependence on imports makes intermediaries seem necessary.
8. Political short-termism → Leaders use procurement for power, not military readiness.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
59. Salam dapat Sedekah kapal rongsok 56 tahun ex USCG Cutter
Adoiimakk
BalasHapushttps://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033770728-750x430.jpg
https://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033767976.jpg
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
The Malondeshn military has a history of major procurement projects being plagued by delays, cost overruns, and outright failures. This issue, often linked to weak governance and a lack of accountability, has severely impacted the armed forces' modernization and operational readiness.
HapusHigh-Profile Failures
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal
The most significant example of a failed project is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program for the Royal Malondeshn Navy.
• Massive Delays and No Delivery: The project, initiated in 2011, was meant to deliver six vessels. However, despite the government paying a substantial portion of the RM9 billion contract, not a single ship has been delivered to the navy, years past the original deadline.
• Financial Irregularities: Audits and parliamentary inquiries revealed massive financial mismanagement, with billions of ringgit paid to questionable subcontractors. This led to a parliamentary report that described the project as a "colossal procurement and governance failure."
________________________________________
Systemic Issues Leading to Delays
These failures are not isolated incidents but symptoms of deeper, systemic problems within the procurement process.
• Weak Contract Enforcement: The government has frequently failed to impose penalties or collect damages from contractors for project delays. An Auditor-General's report found that penalties worth over RM162 million for the delayed delivery of armored vehicles were not collected.
• Unsuitability of Contractors: Contractors are sometimes awarded major projects despite having a poor track record or being in a weak financial position. The LCS project, for instance, was awarded to a company that had previously struggled with another naval project.
• Influence of Middlemen: The involvement of intermediaries and agents in defense contracts often drives up costs and can lead to a selection process that is not based on the military's genuine needs.
• Lack of Oversight: There is a persistent lack of effective monitoring and oversight throughout the project lifecycle. This allows contractors to get away with poor performance and non-compliance with agreed-upon terms.
In short, a combination of political interference, a lack of transparency, and poor financial management has created an environment where major defense projects in Malondesh are highly susceptible to failure. These delays and failures not only waste public funds but also leave the armed forces with an outdated and under-equipped inventory, compromising national security.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. Lack of Transparency and Accountability ðĩ️♀️
HapusDefense procurement in Malondesh frequently operates with a high degree of secrecy, often justified under the guise of national security. This lack of public scrutiny makes the process vulnerable to mismanagement and corruption.
• Direct Negotiation: A common practice is direct negotiation instead of open tenders, which limits competition and can lead to inflated costs. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim himself has stated the need to end the old practice of involving "too many agents" who profit from commissions.
• Role of Middlemen: The use of intermediaries and agents in defense contracts is a long-standing issue. These middlemen often add significant markups, leading to the government paying far more than the actual value of the equipment.
________________________________________
2. High-Profile Scandals and Financial Mismanagement
Several major defense projects have been mired in controversy, serving as stark examples of procurement failures.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal: This is the most notorious case. The project to build six naval vessels for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. Despite the government having paid a substantial portion of the RM9 billion contract, not a single ship has been delivered. A parliamentary report revealed that the contract was awarded through direct negotiation and that hundreds of millions of ringgit were paid to dubious companies.
• Auditor-General's Reports: Reports from the Auditor-General's Department have repeatedly exposed financial irregularities. For example, a recent audit on the army's armored vehicle project found that the government failed to collect RM162.75 million in penalties from contractors for delayed deliveries. The report also highlighted instances of "contract splitting," where large contracts were broken into smaller ones to bypass proper tender procedures.
________________________________________
3. Consequences on Military Readiness
The inefficient and opaque procurement process has tangible negative consequences for the Malondeshn Armed Forces' operational capabilities.
• Obsolete Equipment: The inability to acquire new assets in a timely and cost-effective manner forces the military to rely on an aging inventory. This leads to high maintenance costs, low operational readiness, and a diminished capacity to respond to modern threats.
• Erosion of Public Trust: Scandals and mismanagement erode public trust in government institutions and the armed forces. It also raises questions about whether taxpayer money is being used effectively to ensure national security.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. Lack of Transparency and Accountability ðĩ️♀️
HapusDefense procurement in Malondesh frequently operates with a high degree of secrecy, often justified under the guise of national security. This lack of public scrutiny makes the process vulnerable to mismanagement and corruption.
• Direct Negotiation: A common practice is direct negotiation instead of open tenders, which limits competition and can lead to inflated costs. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim himself has stated the need to end the old practice of involving "too many agents" who profit from commissions.
• Role of Middlemen: The use of intermediaries and agents in defense contracts is a long-standing issue. These middlemen often add significant markups, leading to the government paying far more than the actual value of the equipment.
________________________________________
2. High-Profile Scandals and Financial Mismanagement
Several major defense projects have been mired in controversy, serving as stark examples of procurement failures.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal: This is the most notorious case. The project to build six naval vessels for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. Despite the government having paid a substantial portion of the RM9 billion contract, not a single ship has been delivered. A parliamentary report revealed that the contract was awarded through direct negotiation and that hundreds of millions of ringgit were paid to dubious companies.
• Auditor-General's Reports: Reports from the Auditor-General's Department have repeatedly exposed financial irregularities. For example, a recent audit on the army's armored vehicle project found that the government failed to collect RM162.75 million in penalties from contractors for delayed deliveries. The report also highlighted instances of "contract splitting," where large contracts were broken into smaller ones to bypass proper tender procedures.
________________________________________
3. Consequences on Military Readiness
The inefficient and opaque procurement process has tangible negative consequences for the Malondeshn Armed Forces' operational capabilities.
• Obsolete Equipment: The inability to acquire new assets in a timely and cost-effective manner forces the military to rely on an aging inventory. This leads to high maintenance costs, low operational readiness, and a diminished capacity to respond to modern threats.
• Erosion of Public Trust: Scandals and mismanagement erode public trust in government institutions and the armed forces. It also raises questions about whether taxpayer money is being used effectively to ensure national security.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. Budgetary and Procurement Constraints
HapusThe MAF's modernization efforts are consistently hampered by limited defense budgets. For many years, defense spending has not been a top government priority, leading to a slow and often delayed acquisition of new assets. This has a direct impact on the military's ability to replace aging platforms and acquire advanced technology.
• Procurement Inefficiency: The process of acquiring new assets is often criticized for a lack of transparency and efficiency. There have been instances of project delays, inflated prices due to middlemen, and even non-delivery of equipment, as highlighted in public reports. This not only wastes taxpayer money but also prevents the MAF from obtaining the assets they need in a timely manner.
2. Aging and Obsolescent Equipment
A significant portion of the MAF's inventory is old and in urgent need of replacement. This is a critical weakness that affects all three branches of the military.
• Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN): Many of the RMN's ships have been in service for decades. This leads to high maintenance costs, frequent breakdowns, and reduced operational availability, which hinders their ability to effectively patrol and defend Malondesh's vast maritime territory.
• Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF): The RMAF operates an aging fleet of helicopters and fighter jets. The use of outdated aircraft not only poses safety risks to personnel but also limits their capacity to perform modern missions, such as air combat and surveillance, especially against more technologically advanced neighbors.
• Malondeshn Army (MA): While the army has seen some recent modernization, it still faces challenges with older armored vehicles and a need for more modern self-propelled artillery and surveillance systems to meet contemporary threats.
3. Limited Self-Reliance
Malondesh has a nascent defense industry and is heavily reliant on foreign suppliers for its military hardware. This dependence creates several problems:
• High Costs: Purchasing from foreign manufacturers is expensive, and without a strong domestic industry, Malondesh has limited leverage for price negotiation or technology transfer.
• Maintenance and Spares: Relying on foreign suppliers for spare parts and maintenance services can be slow and costly, further exacerbating the issue of low operational readiness for key assets.
4. Human Resources Challenges
Beyond hardware, the MAF also faces challenges in personnel management. Issues such as low morale, poor living conditions in some barracks, and difficulty in recruiting and retaining skilled personnel have been noted. These factors can affect the overall professionalism and readiness of the armed forces.
In summary, the MAF's weaknesses are intertwined: limited budgets lead to slow procurement, which results in an aging inventory. This aging equipment then drives up maintenance costs and lowers operational readiness, creating a cycle of challenges that impacts the MAF's ability to effectively protect national sovereignty and interests.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
ð What Is the ECRL?
Hapus• Initially launched in 2016 under Malondesh’s previous government as part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
• Constructed by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), with financing largely from Export-Import Bank of China.
ð° Debt and Financial Concerns
• The original cost was RM65.5 billion (approx. US$20 billion), with RM500 million in annual interest alone.
• Critics feared Malondesh could fall into a “debt trap”, where repayment obligations would strain national finances.
• In 2018–2019, Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad suspended and renegotiated the project, citing:
o Excessive cost
o Unfavorable loan terms
o Lack of transparency in contracts2
ð Cancellation and Renegotiation
• Mahathir announced the temporary cancellation of ECRL and two gas pipeline projects during a visit to Beijing in 20183.
• He emphasized that Malondesh couldn’t afford the projects at the time and sought to reduce national debt, which had ballooned to RM1 trillion (approx. US$250 billion).
• China reportedly understood Malondesh’s position, and negotiations continued to revise the scope and cost.
✅ Revised Project Status
• The project was revived in 2019 with a reduced cost of RM44 billion, and a shortened route to cut expenses.
• Construction resumed, with completion now targeted for December 2026, and operations expected to begin in January 2027.
• Malondesh also launched Economic Accelerator Projects (EAPs) alongside ECRL to boost local benefits, such as industrial parks and logistics hubs.
ðēðū Strategic Implications
• The ECRL remains one of the largest BRI projects outside China.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
ð WHY MIDDLEMEN CONTINUE TO EXIST IN MALONDESH’S MILITARY PROCUREMENT
HapusPolitical Patronage & Cronyism
• Many defense-linked companies in Malondesh are controlled by politically connected individuals or government-linked corporations (GLCs).
• Acting as a “middleman” for a defense deal is not just business — it’s a reward system for political loyalty.
• Example: In the ScorpÃĻne submarine scandal, Perimekar Sdn Bhd (the middleman company) was owned by individuals linked to political elites.
Why it continues: Political elites benefit financially and maintain power by distributing contracts to allies.
________________________________________
Opaque Procurement Process (Lack of Transparency)
• Defense contracts in Malondesh are often classified as “national security matters”, meaning details are hidden from Parliament, auditors, and the public.
• Procurement is frequently done through direct negotiations instead of competitive open tenders.
• This secrecy makes it easy to insert middlemen under the label of “consultants,” “logistics providers,” or “offset partners.”
Why it continues: The secrecy shields middlemen from scrutiny, allowing commissions and inflated costs to persist.
________________________________________
Weak Oversight & Accountability
• Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the Auditor-General can only partially review defense contracts due to security classifications.
• Military officers often have little power to question political decisions — final procurement authority lies with the Ministry of Defence and Cabinet, where politics dominates.
• Anti-corruption bodies (like MACC) rarely investigate defense procurement deeply because cases are complex, sensitive, and involve powerful figures.
Why it continues: Oversight bodies lack the legal and political power to stop or expose middleman practices.
________________________________________
Foreign Supplier Requirements
• Many foreign defense companies prefer or are required to use local partners when selling to Malondesh.
• The justification:
o To handle local bureaucracy.
o To provide after-sales service.
o To manage offsets (technology transfer, training).
• In practice, these “local partners” often act as middlemen who extract commissions rather than provide real technical services.
Why it continues: The system is normalized — foreign suppliers accept it as “the cost of doing business in Malondesh.”
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
59. Salam dapat Sedekah kapal rongsok 56 tahun ex USCG Cutter
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
59. Salam dapat Sedekah kapal rongsok 56 tahun ex USCG Cutter
Malaydesh lawak badut ASEAN , angkatan tentara Rongsok seluruh matra ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapussoal TYPHOON yg ditawarin ke PHILIPINA.
BalasHapusSELAIN MEHONG SUPER.... AKU KURANG YKIN PHILIPINA SANGGUP PERAWATAN.
SEBAB TYPHOON TERKENAL SANGAT RIBET.. APALAGI DI HANGAR HARUS SEDIA AC BUANG JAGAIN TUH BADAI
Pantas di gelar angkatan tentara Rongsok Malaydesh miskin ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusLepas MEMBUAL Hornet RONGSOKAN...sekarang MEMBUAL SU-57E....ððððĪŠððĪĢð§ðĐð
BalasHapusKhas Malaydesh
MMW9 September 2025 pukul 15.09
BalasHapusAdoiimakk
https://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033770728-750x430.jpg
https://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033767976.jpg
××××××××××××××××××××××
... Propaganda Malondesh selalu berbasis FOTO langsung KLAIM SHOPPING Su-57....
Setelah itu,
DITAMPAR oleh President TRUMP senilai USD 240 Billion...
Malondesh kira US Government bisa Dipermainkan.....
Netizen Indonesia tertawa terbahak-bahak dong
WKWKWKWK
Malondesh IQ ayam konon lebih kaya dari Indonesia ððð, ternyata miskin tiada henti ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusMalondesh IQ ayam konon lebih kaya dari Indonesia ððð, ternyata miskin tiada henti ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusMMW9 September 2025 pukul 15.09
BalasHapusAdoiimakk
https://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033770728-750x430.jpg
https://defencesecurityasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/FB_IMG_1732033767976.jpg
××××××××××××××××××××××
... Propaganda Malondesh selalu berbasis FOTO langsung KLAIM SHOPPING Su-57....
Setelah itu,
DITAMPAR oleh President TRUMP:
Tamparan Keras Pertama:
Shopping senilai USD 240 Billion...
Tamparan Keras Kedua:
CAATSA ....
Malondesh kira US Government bisa Dipermainkan.....
Netizen Indonesia tertawa terbahak-bahak dong
WKWKWKWK
ð ðĪĢð malaydesh kena PRANK Kuwait...
BalasHapus01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
59. Salam dapat Sedekah kapal rongsok 56 tahun ex USCG Cutter
1. Budgetary and Procurement Constraints
BalasHapusThe MAF's modernization efforts are consistently hampered by limited defense budgets. For many years, defense spending has not been a top government priority, leading to a slow and often delayed acquisition of new assets. This has a direct impact on the military's ability to replace aging platforms and acquire advanced technology.
• Procurement Inefficiency: The process of acquiring new assets is often criticized for a lack of transparency and efficiency. There have been instances of project delays, inflated prices due to middlemen, and even non-delivery of equipment, as highlighted in public reports. This not only wastes taxpayer money but also prevents the MAF from obtaining the assets they need in a timely manner.
2. Aging and Obsolescent Equipment
A significant portion of the MAF's inventory is old and in urgent need of replacement. This is a critical weakness that affects all three branches of the military.
• Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN): Many of the RMN's ships have been in service for decades. This leads to high maintenance costs, frequent breakdowns, and reduced operational availability, which hinders their ability to effectively patrol and defend Malondesh's vast maritime territory.
• Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF): The RMAF operates an aging fleet of helicopters and fighter jets. The use of outdated aircraft not only poses safety risks to personnel but also limits their capacity to perform modern missions, such as air combat and surveillance, especially against more technologically advanced neighbors.
• Malondeshn Army (MA): While the army has seen some recent modernization, it still faces challenges with older armored vehicles and a need for more modern self-propelled artillery and surveillance systems to meet contemporary threats.
3. Limited Self-Reliance
Malondesh has a nascent defense industry and is heavily reliant on foreign suppliers for its military hardware. This dependence creates several problems:
• High Costs: Purchasing from foreign manufacturers is expensive, and without a strong domestic industry, Malondesh has limited leverage for price negotiation or technology transfer.
• Maintenance and Spares: Relying on foreign suppliers for spare parts and maintenance services can be slow and costly, further exacerbating the issue of low operational readiness for key assets.
4. Human Resources Challenges
Beyond hardware, the MAF also faces challenges in personnel management. Issues such as low morale, poor living conditions in some barracks, and difficulty in recruiting and retaining skilled personnel have been noted. These factors can affect the overall professionalism and readiness of the armed forces.
In summary, the MAF's weaknesses are intertwined: limited budgets lead to slow procurement, which results in an aging inventory. This aging equipment then drives up maintenance costs and lowers operational readiness, creating a cycle of challenges that impacts the MAF's ability to effectively protect national sovereignty and interests.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
1. CELAH KEMAMPUAN (CAPABILITY GAP)
BalasHapusIni adalah masalah yang paling mendesak, terutama jika dibandingkan dengan negara-negara tetangga seperti Singapura dan Indonesia yang terus memodernisasi angkatan bersenjata mereka.
• Angkatan Udara yang Melemah: Angkatan Udara Kerajaan Malondesh (TUDM) menghadapi tantangan terbesar. Dengan pensiunnya jet tempur MiG-29, TUDM memiliki celah yang signifikan dalam kekuatan tempur multi-peran. Meskipun mereka sedang dalam proses mengakuisisi pesawat ringan seperti FA-50, hal ini tidak sepenuhnya bisa menggantikan peran jet tempur berat. Selain itu, masalah pemeliharaan dan ketersediaan suku cadang untuk jet tempur Sukhoi Su-30MKM yang sudah ada juga menjadi masalah kronis.
• Kesenjangan Armada Laut: Angkatan Laut Kerajaan Malondesh (TLDM) menghadapi dua masalah besar:
o Kapal Tua: Banyak kapal perang TLDM sudah sangat tua, dengan usia rata-rata melebihi 30 tahun. Ini membuat biaya perawatan menjadi sangat tinggi dan menurunkan kesiapan operasional.
o Skandal LCS: Proyek kapal tempur pesisir (LCS) yang sarat korupsi telah menelan miliaran ringgit tanpa menghasilkan satu pun kapal yang siap beroperasi. Ini menciptakan celah besar dalam kekuatan maritim dan merusak kepercayaan publik serta kredibilitas industri pertahanan Malondesh.
• Peralatan Darat yang Kurang Canggih: Meskipun ada upaya modernisasi, Angkatan Darat Malondesh masih mengandalkan sebagian besar peralatan lama. Tank PT-91M Pendekar, yang merupakan aset utama, seringkali mengalami masalah teknis dan ketersediaan suku cadang.
2. Celah Anggaran dan Kebijakan (Budget and Policy Gap)
Meskipun anggaran pertahanan telah meningkat, masih ada ketidaksesuaian antara alokasi dana dan kebutuhan nyata.
• Prioritas yang Berubah-ubah: Pemerintah Malondesh sering kali mengalihkan prioritas anggaran, terutama di masa kesulitan ekonomi. Ini menyebabkan proyek modernisasi militer yang sudah direncanakan berulang kali ditunda atau dibatalkan.
• Kurangnya Transparansi: Pengadaan militer sering dilakukan di balik layar (direct negotiation), yang membuka celah besar untuk korupsi dan inefisiensi. Hal ini tidak hanya membuang anggaran, tetapi juga mengakibatkan keterlambatan proyek dan akuisisi peralatan yang tidak sesuai dengan kebutuhan militer.
3. Celah Teknis dan Industri (Technology and Industry Gap)
• Ketergantungan pada Impor: Malondesh masih sangat bergantung pada produsen asing untuk peralatan pertahanan canggih. Kurangnya kapabilitas industri pertahanan dalam negeri untuk memproduksi dan memelihara aset-aset kunci membuat militer rentan terhadap fluktuasi pasokan dan perubahan kebijakan dari negara produsen.
• Keterlambatan dalam Teknologi Baru: Sambil negara lain berinvestasi besar-besaran dalam teknologi perang modern seperti drone, kecerdasan buatan (AI), dan perang siber, Malondesh tertinggal dalam adopsi teknologi ini. Meskipun ada inisiatif untuk mengakuisisi drone Anka-S dari Turki, langkah ini masih terbilang lambat dibandingkan dengan kecepatan modernisasi militer di kawasan.
4. Celah Sumber Daya Manusia (Human Resources Gap)
• Kualitas dan Retensi Personel: Militer Malondesh menghadapi tantangan dalam menarik dan mempertahankan personel berkualitas tinggi. Gaji yang relatif rendah dan kondisi kerja yang kurang memadai seringkali menjadi faktor penghambat. Hal ini berdampak pada kemampuan militer untuk mengoperasikan dan memelihara peralatan canggih.
• Keterbatasan Pelatihan: Dengan terbatasnya anggaran dan peralatan yang tidak siap operasional, militer sering kali tidak dapat melakukan latihan yang memadai dan realistis. Ini membatasi pengalaman dan kesiapan tempur personel.
Secara ringkas, celah terbesar dalam modernisasi militer Malondesh adalah antara apa yang seharusnya mereka miliki untuk menghadapi ancaman modern dan apa yang benar-benar mereka miliki. Ini adalah siklus yang kompleks dari masalah keuangan, kebijakan yang tidak konsisten, kurangnya industri dalam negeri yang kuat, dan masalah korupsi yang merusak semua upaya untuk memodernisasi angkatan bersenjata.
ð What Is the ECRL?
BalasHapus• Initially launched in 2016 under Malondesh’s previous government as part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
• Constructed by China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), with financing largely from Export-Import Bank of China.
ð° Debt and Financial Concerns
• The original cost was RM65.5 billion (approx. US$20 billion), with RM500 million in annual interest alone.
• Critics feared Malondesh could fall into a “debt trap”, where repayment obligations would strain national finances.
• In 2018–2019, Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad suspended and renegotiated the project, citing:
o Excessive cost
o Unfavorable loan terms
o Lack of transparency in contracts2
ð Cancellation and Renegotiation
• Mahathir announced the temporary cancellation of ECRL and two gas pipeline projects during a visit to Beijing in 20183.
• He emphasized that Malondesh couldn’t afford the projects at the time and sought to reduce national debt, which had ballooned to RM1 trillion (approx. US$250 billion).
• China reportedly understood Malondesh’s position, and negotiations continued to revise the scope and cost.
✅ Revised Project Status
• The project was revived in 2019 with a reduced cost of RM44 billion, and a shortened route to cut expenses.
• Construction resumed, with completion now targeted for December 2026, and operations expected to begin in January 2027.
• Malondesh also launched Economic Accelerator Projects (EAPs) alongside ECRL to boost local benefits, such as industrial parks and logistics hubs.
ðēðū Strategic Implications
• The ECRL remains one of the largest BRI projects outside China.
=============
GOVERNMENT DEBT : 69% of GDP
HOUSEHOLD DEBT : 84.3% of GDP
Federal Government Debt
• End of 2024: RM 1.25 trillion
• End of June 2025: RM 1.3 trillion
• Projected Debt-to-GDP: 69% by the end of 2025
Household Debt
• End of March 2025: RM 1.65 trillion or 84.3% of GDP
=============
DEBT MARCH 2025 = 1,65 TRILLION
DEBT 2024 = RM 1.63 TRILLION
DEBT 2023 = RM 1,53 TRILLION
DEBT 2022 = RM 1,45 TRILLION
DEBT 2021 = RM 1,38 TRILLION
DEBT 2020 = RM 1,32 TRILLION
DEBT 2019 = RM 1,25 TRILLION
DEBT 2018 = RM 1,19 TRILLION
MALONDESH RAJA PRANK KENA BALIK PRANK SAMA EMIR KUWAIT......MASIH KALAH ILMUNYA TERNYATA MALONDESH ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
BalasHapusNEGARA MISKIB CUKUP JADI JURU SORAK SAJA LON ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
Beliau berkata, pesawat itu yang sudah berusia ❌️18 tahun
BalasHapus“Bagi pesawat pejuang, tempoh minimum boleh beroperasi adalah❌️20 tahun
------------
esyu emkaem uda 18 taon, batas operasi 20 tahun...kata panglima seblah
naah 2 taon lagi RONGSOK gaesz haha!ðĩðŦððĩðŦ
ketemu hornet seken kuwait...tambah jadi dah genk Rongsok ngumpul haha!ðĨķ☠️ðĨķ
TIM ELIT SHOPPING SOPING Jet Tempur FULL Baruw hore haha!ðĪðĪðĪ
BalasHapusMRCA THAILEN
✅️GIPENG E/F
MRCA SING
✅️F-35
ðŪðĐkita SHOPPING MRCA
ðŦð·rafale
ðđð·kaan
ð°ð·boramae
sedangkan negrið°Kas Bon Bon genting, klaim negri maju & kaya tapi kok minat rongsokan hornet Kuwait?
apa kl gak Malyu Kalah Lagi dibanding mantan propinsinya Sing haha!ððð
Kaji..Kajii..last last kensel haha!ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
eitt gimana kalo SEWAAA...jimat kos swdap kaan haha!ððð