06 September 2025
Proposal peningkatan MIFV K-200 Cendana Auto Sdn Bhd kepada Tentera Darat Malaysia terlihat di Latihan Kuasa Tembak (LKT) 2025 kemarin. Berdasarkan informasi diterima, Cendana Auto membagikan beberapa detail dan foto proposal dengan kode nama MIFV-CH25 tersebut. Bermitra dengan Hanwha Aerospace Korea Selatan, bukti riil konsep kendaraan ini akan mengalami beberapa peningkatan modernisasi.
Perombakan menyeluruh ini mencakup mesin, transmisi, pendingin kabin dan jok, sistem elektronik, pintu ramp bantuan hidrolik, sensor optik kesadaran situasi, sistem deteksi akustik, dan RCWS.
Peningkatan ini dikatakan serupa dengan KIFV milik Angkatan Darat Korea Selatan. Foto-foto yang disediakan berasal dari berbagai uji coba yang dilakukan oleh Angkatan Darat dan uji tembak langsung di LKT.
- Mesin baru yang diusulkan dan lebih bertenaga adalah mesin MAN-Doosan D2848T V-8, yang menghasilkan tenaga 350hp dan transmisi otomatis Allison X200-5K.
- Sistem pendingin kabin dan jok baru untuk kenyamanan dan keselamatan awak. - Sistem elektronik yang disempurnakan dengan panel instrumen dan tampilan terintegrasi untuk penanganan yang lebih baik.
- Pintu ramp belakang berbantuan hidrolik baru untuk pengoperasian yang efisien.
- Perlindungan kewaspadaan situasional yang ditambahkan dan ditingkatkan kini hadir dengan lampu kendaraan LED baru, kamera LED termal dan inframerah depan dan belakang, sistem deteksi tembakan akustik Pilar V, dan enam peluncur granat asap.
- Sistem persenjataan yang diusulkan adalah Hanwha RCWS untuk meriam 12,7 mm. Beberapa fitur termasuk image stabiliser, tracking lock dan pengisian ulang otomatis jarak jauh. Sensor optik sistem juga berfungsi sebagai sistem pengawasan.
Tidak yakin apakah akan ada uji evaluasi lebih lanjut yang dilakukan oleh Angkatan Darat, dan seperti apa hasilnya nanti. Dengan aset yang semakin tua, dan dana yang terbatas untuk perangkat keras baru, peningkatan IFV dapat dianggap sebagai cara yang efektif untuk memelihara platform bergerak lapis baja yang dibutuhkan. Akankah program ini menerima dana untuk RMK13 ini? Hanya PMX Anwar Ibrahim yang punya jawabannya.
🔎 WHY MIDDLEMEN CONTINUE TO EXIST IN MALONDESH’S MILITARY PROCUREMENT
BalasHapusPolitical Patronage & Cronyism
• Many defense-linked companies in Malondesh are controlled by politically connected individuals or government-linked corporations (GLCs).
• Acting as a “middleman” for a defense deal is not just business — it’s a reward system for political loyalty.
• Example: In the Scorpène submarine scandal, Perimekar Sdn Bhd (the middleman company) was owned by individuals linked to political elites.
Why it continues: Political elites benefit financially and maintain power by distributing contracts to allies.
________________________________________
Opaque Procurement Process (Lack of Transparency)
• Defense contracts in Malondesh are often classified as “national security matters”, meaning details are hidden from Parliament, auditors, and the public.
• Procurement is frequently done through direct negotiations instead of competitive open tenders.
• This secrecy makes it easy to insert middlemen under the label of “consultants,” “logistics providers,” or “offset partners.”
Why it continues: The secrecy shields middlemen from scrutiny, allowing commissions and inflated costs to persist.
________________________________________
Weak Oversight & Accountability
• Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the Auditor-General can only partially review defense contracts due to security classifications.
• Military officers often have little power to question political decisions — final procurement authority lies with the Ministry of Defence and Cabinet, where politics dominates.
• Anti-corruption bodies (like MACC) rarely investigate defense procurement deeply because cases are complex, sensitive, and involve powerful figures.
Why it continues: Oversight bodies lack the legal and political power to stop or expose middleman practices.
________________________________________
Foreign Supplier Requirements
• Many foreign defense companies prefer or are required to use local partners when selling to Malondesh.
• The justification:
o To handle local bureaucracy.
o To provide after-sales service.
o To manage offsets (technology transfer, training).
• In practice, these “local partners” often act as middlemen who extract commissions rather than provide real technical services.
Why it continues: The system is normalized — foreign suppliers accept it as “the cost of doing business in Malondesh.”
🪖 ARMY GAPS — VULNERABLE TO MODERN COMBINED-ARMS WARFARE
BalasHapusMalondesh’s Current Situation
• Armored Vehicles
o Still operates Condor APCs (1980s).
o New AV8 Gempita (Turkish FNSS partnership) in service, but deliveries are slow and numbers limited.
• Artillery & Firepower
o Mix of old towed artillery and a few self-propelled systems.
o No modern Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) compared to neighbors.
• Air Defense
o Extremely weak: relies mainly on MANPADS (Igla, Starstreak) for short-range defense.
o No medium or long-range SAMs, leaving Malondeshn forces and infrastructure vulnerable to modern air strikes.
• Infantry
o Professional and experienced (notably in counterinsurgency), but under-equipped for high-intensity, modern warfare.
Regional Comparison
• Singapore: Strong mechanized force, Leopard 2 tanks, advanced artillery (PzH2000), Iron Dome-derived air defense.
• Indonesia: Expanding heavy armor, artillery, and air defense systems (NASAMS, S-300, etc.).
• Thailand: Upgrading tanks and artillery with Chinese and Ukrainian systems.
Implications
• In a high-intensity war, Malondeshn Army units would struggle against modern mechanized forces.
• Lack of air defense means Malondesh cannot protect key bases, cities, or troops from airstrikes or drones.
• Malondesh risks being confined to low-intensity operations (counterinsurgency, peacekeeping), while lacking credibility in regional conflicts.
🪖 ARMY GAPS
BalasHapusTHE MALONDESHN ARMY REMAINS HEAVILY MANPOWER-BASED BUT LACKS MODERN HEAVY FIREPOWER AND AIR DEFENSE.
Current Situation
• Armored vehicles:
o Still uses Condor APCs (1980s).
o AV8 Gempita (modern, joint Malondeshn-Turkish design) introduced but in limited numbers.
• Artillery: Mix of old towed guns and some self-propelled howitzers; lacks long-range precision systems.
• Air defense:
o Only short-range MANPADS (Igla, Starstreak).
o No medium or long-range SAMs (surface-to-air missiles).
• Helicopters: Slow delivery of light attack helicopters (MD530G).
Problems
• Army lacks modern combined-arms capability (armor + artillery + air defense).
• Vulnerable to airstrikes, drones, and missile attacks because of weak air defense.
• Heavy reliance on light infantry → good for counterinsurgency, weak in high-intensity warfare.
Regional Comparison
• Singapore: Fully mechanized army with Leopard 2 tanks, modern artillery, HIMARS rocket systems, and I-Hawk SAMs.
• Indonesia: Leopard 2 tanks, CAESAR howitzers, NASAMS air defense.
• Thailand: VT-4 tanks from China, Gripen air cover, strong artillery.
👉 Malondesh’s Risk: In a conventional war, the Malondeshn Army could not sustain modern combined-arms warfare and would rely on defensive, guerrilla-style tactics.
Jawabannya sudah pasti : Takdewang
BalasHapus🤣🤣😂🤪😛🇧🇩👎
"....Tidak yakin apakah akan ada uji evaluasi lebih lanjut yang dilakukan oleh Angkatan Darat, dan seperti apa hasilnya nanti. Dengan aset yang semakin tua, dan dana yang terbatas untuk perangkat keras baru.."
1. Budgetary and Procurement Constraints
BalasHapusThe MAF's modernization efforts are consistently hampered by limited defense budgets. For many years, defense spending has not been a top government priority, leading to a slow and often delayed acquisition of new assets. This has a direct impact on the military's ability to replace aging platforms and acquire advanced technology.
• Procurement Inefficiency: The process of acquiring new assets is often criticized for a lack of transparency and efficiency. There have been instances of project delays, inflated prices due to middlemen, and even non-delivery of equipment, as highlighted in public reports. This not only wastes taxpayer money but also prevents the MAF from obtaining the assets they need in a timely manner.
2. Aging and Obsolescent Equipment
A significant portion of the MAF's inventory is old and in urgent need of replacement. This is a critical weakness that affects all three branches of the military.
• Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN): Many of the RMN's ships have been in service for decades. This leads to high maintenance costs, frequent breakdowns, and reduced operational availability, which hinders their ability to effectively patrol and defend Malaysia's vast maritime territory.
• Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF): The RMAF operates an aging fleet of helicopters and fighter jets. The use of outdated aircraft not only poses safety risks to personnel but also limits their capacity to perform modern missions, such as air combat and surveillance, especially against more technologically advanced neighbors.
• Malaysian Army (MA): While the army has seen some recent modernization, it still faces challenges with older armored vehicles and a need for more modern self-propelled artillery and surveillance systems to meet contemporary threats.
3. Limited Self-Reliance
Malaysia has a nascent defense industry and is heavily reliant on foreign suppliers for its military hardware. This dependence creates several problems:
• High Costs: Purchasing from foreign manufacturers is expensive, and without a strong domestic industry, Malaysia has limited leverage for price negotiation or technology transfer.
• Maintenance and Spares: Relying on foreign suppliers for spare parts and maintenance services can be slow and costly, further exacerbating the issue of low operational readiness for key assets.
4. Human Resources Challenges
Beyond hardware, the MAF also faces challenges in personnel management. Issues such as low morale, poor living conditions in some barracks, and difficulty in recruiting and retaining skilled personnel have been noted. These factors can affect the overall professionalism and readiness of the armed forces.
In summary, the MAF's weaknesses are intertwined: limited budgets lead to slow procurement, which results in an aging inventory. This aging equipment then drives up maintenance costs and lowers operational readiness, creating a cycle of challenges that impacts the MAF's ability to effectively protect national sovereignty and interests.
COCOK BUAT ASET MALONDESH...TUWIR 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapusThe Malondeshn military faces significant challenges in its modernization and readiness due to budgetary and procurement constraints. These issues are not new but have become more pronounced in recent years, impacting its ability to acquire new equipment and maintain existing assets.
BalasHapus1. Limited and Inconsistent Budget Allocation
The defense budget in Malondesh is often constrained by competing national priorities such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure development. While recent budgets have shown slight increases, the overall allocation remains small compared to the country's defense needs and the spending of some of its regional counterparts. This limited funding forces the military to prioritize between acquiring new assets and maintaining its current aging fleet, often leading to a compromise on both.
• Impact: The lack of consistent, long-term funding prevents the Ministry of Defence from undertaking large-scale, multi-year procurement projects with confidence. This results in piecemeal acquisitions and an inability to execute a comprehensive, long-term modernization plan.
________________________________________
2. Inefficient and Opaque Procurement Process
The procurement process itself is a major source of weakness, often criticized for a lack of transparency and for being susceptible to inefficiencies. Reports from the Auditor-General have repeatedly highlighted critical issues.
• Delayed and Uncollected Penalties: A recent Auditor-General's report revealed significant weaknesses in the contract and procurement management for the army's armored vehicles. It found that the government failed to collect RM162.75 million in penalties for delayed deliveries and did not impose another RM1.42 million in penalties for late maintenance services.
• Contract Splitting: The audit also found instances of contract splitting, where a large contract was broken down into smaller ones to circumvent open tender regulations. This practice, amounting to RM107.54 million in one instance, opens the door to irregularities and undermines fair competition.
• Reliance on Agents: There are often concerns that procurement decisions are influenced by agents rather than being based on the military's genuine operational needs and market prices. This can lead to the acquisition of unsuitable or overpriced equipment.
________________________________________
3. Delays and Failures in Major Projects
The combination of budget constraints and procurement inefficiencies has led to high-profile failures and delays in major defense projects.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal: This is a prominent example. The project to build six naval vessels was plagued by massive cost overruns and significant delays, despite the government having paid a substantial portion of the contract value. As a result, not a single ship has been delivered.
• Delayed Deliveries: Other projects, such as the acquisition of armored vehicles, have also faced extensive delays, with some vehicles delivered years behind schedule. This directly impacts the operational readiness of the armed forces and their ability to fulfill their missions.
1. Lack of Transparency and Accountability 🕵️♀️
BalasHapusDefense procurement in Malondesh frequently operates with a high degree of secrecy, often justified under the guise of national security. This lack of public scrutiny makes the process vulnerable to mismanagement and corruption.
• Direct Negotiation: A common practice is direct negotiation instead of open tenders, which limits competition and can lead to inflated costs. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim himself has stated the need to end the old practice of involving "too many agents" who profit from commissions.
• Role of Middlemen: The use of intermediaries and agents in defense contracts is a long-standing issue. These middlemen often add significant markups, leading to the government paying far more than the actual value of the equipment.
________________________________________
2. High-Profile Scandals and Financial Mismanagement
Several major defense projects have been mired in controversy, serving as stark examples of procurement failures.
• The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal: This is the most notorious case. The project to build six naval vessels for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. Despite the government having paid a substantial portion of the RM9 billion contract, not a single ship has been delivered. A parliamentary report revealed that the contract was awarded through direct negotiation and that hundreds of millions of ringgit were paid to dubious companies.
• Auditor-General's Reports: Reports from the Auditor-General's Department have repeatedly exposed financial irregularities. For example, a recent audit on the army's armored vehicle project found that the government failed to collect RM162.75 million in penalties from contractors for delayed deliveries. The report also highlighted instances of "contract splitting," where large contracts were broken into smaller ones to bypass proper tender procedures.
________________________________________
3. Consequences on Military Readiness
The inefficient and opaque procurement process has tangible negative consequences for the Malondeshn Armed Forces' operational capabilities.
• Obsolete Equipment: The inability to acquire new assets in a timely and cost-effective manner forces the military to rely on an aging inventory. This leads to high maintenance costs, low operational readiness, and a diminished capacity to respond to modern threats.
• Erosion of Public Trust: Scandals and mismanagement erode public trust in government institutions and the armed forces. It also raises questions about whether taxpayer money is being used effectively to ensure national security.
The Malondeshn military has a history of major procurement projects being plagued by delays, cost overruns, and outright failures. This issue, often linked to weak governance and a lack of accountability, has severely impacted the armed forces' modernization and operational readiness.
BalasHapusHigh-Profile Failures
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal
The most significant example of a failed project is the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program for the Royal Malondeshn Navy.
• Massive Delays and No Delivery: The project, initiated in 2011, was meant to deliver six vessels. However, despite the government paying a substantial portion of the RM9 billion contract, not a single ship has been delivered to the navy, years past the original deadline.
• Financial Irregularities: Audits and parliamentary inquiries revealed massive financial mismanagement, with billions of ringgit paid to questionable subcontractors. This led to a parliamentary report that described the project as a "colossal procurement and governance failure."
________________________________________
Systemic Issues Leading to Delays
These failures are not isolated incidents but symptoms of deeper, systemic problems within the procurement process.
• Weak Contract Enforcement: The government has frequently failed to impose penalties or collect damages from contractors for project delays. An Auditor-General's report found that penalties worth over RM162 million for the delayed delivery of armored vehicles were not collected.
• Unsuitability of Contractors: Contractors are sometimes awarded major projects despite having a poor track record or being in a weak financial position. The LCS project, for instance, was awarded to a company that had previously struggled with another naval project.
• Influence of Middlemen: The involvement of intermediaries and agents in defense contracts often drives up costs and can lead to a selection process that is not based on the military's genuine needs.
• Lack of Oversight: There is a persistent lack of effective monitoring and oversight throughout the project lifecycle. This allows contractors to get away with poor performance and non-compliance with agreed-upon terms.
In short, a combination of political interference, a lack of transparency, and poor financial management has created an environment where major defense projects in Malondesh are highly susceptible to failure. These delays and failures not only waste public funds but also leave the armed forces with an outdated and under-equipped inventory, compromising national security.
Liat model bentukannya seperti liat hewan apa gitu, aneh?
BalasHapus01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
01. Salam bina Candi LCS MaharajaLele Mangkrak Karatan 14 tahun SALAH POTONG, seharga RM 12 Billion
BalasHapus02. Salam bina senapang Allien tembak tupai VITA lendir BERAPI
03. Salam KERAjaan BANGKRAP di gondoli Jho Law
04. Salam bina kereta kebal 8x8 GEMPITA tampel sticker tak boleh eksport
05. Salam bina tank ugly STRIDE bentuk KOTAK Turet impoten
06. Salam bina rudal antar Galaxy ugly TAMING SARI
07. Salam bina jet PTM GEN 6 hasil mimpi basah insinyur 5 top university
08. Salam bina drone ugly NYAMUK
09. Salam bina KERETA KIPAS TERBANG tampal Sticker dari Cina
10. Salam bina kereta PROTON tak laku di jual ke gelly cina
11. Salam Komando LETUPKAN wanita hamil
12. Salam komando TEWAS saat DEMO, tembak Komandan sendiri
13. Salam komando PINGSAN saat latihan berbaris
14. Salam Komando TEWAS dilempar GRANAT teman sendiri
15. Salam Komando tewas Saat BERENANG
16. Salam kapal selam SCORPANE tak boleh selam sebelum MRO
17. Salam LMS Ompong, plat tipis, lambat, setahun pakai radio rusak, dari CINA untuk lawan CINA
18. Salam kapal RUSAK oleh JARING nelayan NGUYEN
19. Salam kapal TONGKANG untuk kapal militer BUNGA MAS LIMA
20. Salam 7 Jet Tersikit dunia F18 hornet meletup JATUH guna parade aja tiada SOURCE CODE
21. Salam Su30MKM 18 Ekor hanya 4 yg boleh terbang
22. Salam Mig29 GROUNDED
23. Salam kilang AIRCROD Lembab MRO 1 pesawat butuh masa 3 tahun
24. Salam heli TELUR PUYUH MD530 KILANGnya Bangkrut
25. Salam engine jet HILANG di SONGLAP ke Uruguay
26. Salam ASKAR BERSARONG bangga jadi penjaga ISTANA british
27. Salam EJECT KAT HANGGAR world record 2 kali
28. Salam kapal militer Gagah Samudra kena sita MYBANK
29. Salam JUDI HALAL BERSYARIAH Gentting Highland daulat tuanku
30. Salam tak punya korps MARINIR,Kapal HOSPITAL,LPD,LST, Tank Amphibi dan SPH
31. Salam TANK PENDEKAR design WW II MOGOK tengah jalan
32. Salam HUTANG Rm 1.5 Trillion 84% PDB, Kumpul koin, Bayar hutang CINA pakai hutang JEPUN, gali LOBANG tutup LOBANG
33. Salam BELI pespur MB339 BARU TANPA ENGIN baru 12 tahun pakai sudah Grounded
34. Salam 88 bijik Jet Bekas GURUN A4 Skyhawk hilang setengah di parkiran GURUN
35. Salam BOMBER Cina dan 16 Pesawat Cina pusing - Pusing langit Sabah cuma kirim NOTA Protes
36. Salam CCG KEKAL 289 hari pertahun di betting Ali, CCG dan nelayan Cina sudah makan tidor berak sedot ikan sedot minyak buang tahi
37. Salam Komando tewas kena tembak SENAPAN ANGIN penyelundup Perlis
38. Salam TAMPAL STICKER Batik,Reog,Wayang,Rendang,Anklung,kuda lumping,Keris,pacu jalur,lagu rasa sayange,lagu halo halo bandung dan lagu terang bulan
39. Salam 9 APC Guardian di tolak PBB tiada RCWS hendak prank PBB dengan harga komplit RCWS
40. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Amerika Convert CN235 basic ke versi MSA Upgrade di PT DI
41. Salam UCAV drone DJI di tempel dua senapan M4 untuk menakuti Kelalawar
42. Salam di bully Singapure, bayar air murah, di ceroboh Jet dan Apache, di ambil batu puteh, bayar denda kereta Cepat, Su 30 MKM di usir dari singapure tiada SLOT
43. Salam dapat SEDEKAH Merdeka semu 999 tahun Tanah mesti sedia di tempati
44. Salam HMAV 4X4 TARANTULA SEWA, Tempel Sticker Hizir Turki
45. Salam RADAR IMPOTEN tak bisa kesan MH370
46. Salam satu satunya LST KD Sri Idrapura Terbakar tiada ganti
47. Salam pesawat intai ISRAEL kencing di langit Ibu negara tak takut di salvo Jernas Lapook
48. Salam TERJUN PAYUNG tersasar ke PASAR
49. Salam 4 kali ditolak NGEMIS hornet bekas RONGSOK Kuwait
50. Salam Eksportir kondom Unisex,Narkoba,Teroris,Togel,Maling ikan,Maling patok
51. Salam tak bayar SEWA Sabah, aset Petronas kena sita SULU
52. Salam GFP Rank 48 di bawah kaki Myanmar
53. Salam SEWA Merata untuk militer Heli AW139,Heli EC120 B,Kapal Hidrografi,Simulator heli,Boat FIB,Boat RHFB,Rover,Motosikal,ATV, Vellfire
54. Salam OPV Fatima berenang MIRING
55. Salam Rehull kapal USANG di Make Over PC ex KD Sundang, PC ex KD Panah
56. Salam PM ex Narapidana Korupsi dan ex Narapidana Sodomi
57. Salam tentara tanam SAYUR
58. Salam KD Ganas Kapal Peyot Tua Rongsok Ompong
KEY FACTORS
BalasHapus1. Direct Negotiation and Lack of Open Tenders
A major problem is the frequent use of direct negotiation instead of open and competitive tenders. This practice, often justified under the pretext of national security, limits competition and reduces transparency. By bypassing the tender process, the government loses the ability to secure the best value for money, and it creates a fertile ground for corruption.
• Example: The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal is a prime example. The multi-billion ringgit contract was awarded through direct negotiation, with a parliamentary inquiry later revealing that the decision ignored the navy's preference for a different ship design.
________________________________________
2. The Role of Middlemen and Agents
The procurement process is often riddled with intermediaries or agents who act as go-betweens for the military and foreign contractors. These middlemen, often with political connections or being former military personnel, add significant markups to the cost of equipment. This practice inflates prices, wastes public funds, and has been a major source of controversy. The King of Malaysia himself has publicly criticized this issue, warning against the influence of "agents and salesmen" in the Defence Ministry.
________________________________________
3. Financial Mismanagement and Weak Oversight
Government audits have consistently revealed systemic financial mismanagement.
• Failure to Collect Penalties: Audit reports have shown that the government failed to impose and collect penalties for delayed deliveries from contractors. In one case, a contractor for armored vehicles did not face a penalty of over RM160 million despite significant delays.
• Contract Splitting: To avoid the scrutiny of larger contracts, some projects are broken down into smaller ones, a practice known as "contract splitting." This allows them to bypass the open tender threshold and be awarded through less rigorous methods, raising concerns about accountability.
• Misappropriation of Funds: In the LCS scandal, a significant portion of the project's funds were allegedly used to pay off debts from old, unrelated naval projects, showcasing a severe lack of financial discipline.
Kemarin ada KERANDA TERBANG ...SEKARANG KOTAK SABUN 🇲🇾🐷🐷🐷🇲🇾🤡🤡🤡🇲🇾🐵🐵🐵🇲🇾💩💩💩
BalasHapusKlo menurut GEMPUR itu kendaraan KOTAK
BalasHapus🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
MANTAP... lengkap RCWS guys.... Manakala INDIANESIA.... BTR50 WW2 masih dipakai... 🤣🤣🤣
BalasHapus1. MASALAH PERAWATAN DAN KESIAPAN OPERASIONAL 🚧
HapusIni adalah kelemahan yang paling sering disorot dan menjadi viral di media sosial.
• Insiden Mogok di Jalan Umum: Tank PT-91M Pendekar pernah beberapa kali mogok di tengah jalan raya, bahkan saat sedang dalam perjalanan untuk acara parade Hari Kemerdekaan. Insiden ini menimbulkan pertanyaan serius dari masyarakat dan parlemen tentang standar perawatan aset militer.
• Kurangnya Suku Cadang: Masalah ini adalah inti dari inefisiensi. Penghentian produksi suku cadang oleh produsen aslinya, Bumar Labedy, memaksa Malondesh untuk mencari solusi alternatif. Upaya ini termasuk menggunakan tenaga ahli lokal untuk memproduksi komponen tertentu, tetapi ini menunjukkan ketergantungan yang rapuh pada produsen eksternal dan kurangnya jaminan rantai pasokan.
• Kurva Pembelajaran yang Curam: Sebagai negara pertama di Asia Tenggara yang mengoperasikan MBT modern, Malondesh menghadapi tantangan dalam mengembangkan basis pengetahuan, keahlian, dan infrastruktur untuk perawatan tank tersebut. Hal ini berbeda dengan negara-negara yang sudah memiliki pengalaman lebih lama dalam mengelola aset militer yang kompleks.
________________________________________
2. Keterbatasan Teknis dan Operasional ⚙️
Meskipun PT-91M adalah versi yang ditingkatkan dari T-72, beberapa keterbatasan masih ada.
• Desain Lama dan Kerentanan: PT-91M merupakan turunan dari T-72, yang memiliki desain kokpit dan penyimpanan amunisi yang terkenal rentan. Dalam pertempuran modern, ini bisa menjadi kelemahan fatal jika dibandingkan dengan tank-tank tempur utama lain yang lebih baru dengan desain yang lebih aman.
• Kemampuan Serangan Terbatas: Dibandingkan dengan tank tempur utama modern yang dimiliki oleh negara tetangga, seperti Leopard 2A4 milik Singapura dan Indonesia, PT-91M Pendekar dianggap memiliki sistem kendali tembak dan perlindungan yang kurang unggul. Meskipun dilengkapi dengan Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA), perlindungan ini mungkin tidak cukup untuk menahan serangan dari amunisi anti-tank terbaru.
________________________________________
3. Masalah Pengadaan dan Jumlah yang Tidak Memadai 💰
• Skandal dan Inefisiensi: Sama seperti proyek kapal LCS, skandal pengadaan dan inefisiensi juga terjadi dalam program tank. Laporan menunjukkan adanya masalah tata kelola yang buruk dalam manajemen kontrak, yang menyebabkan aset tidak dapat digunakan secara maksimal.
• Jumlah yang Sedikit: Malondesh hanya memiliki 48 unit tank PT-91M Pendekar. Jumlah ini dianggap sangat tidak memadai untuk kebutuhan pertahanan negara, terutama jika dibandingkan dengan negara tetangga yang memiliki jumlah armada lapis baja yang jauh lebih besar.
1. MASALAH PERAWATAN DAN KESIAPAN OPERASIONAL 🚧
HapusIni adalah kelemahan yang paling sering disorot dan menjadi viral di media sosial.
• Insiden Mogok di Jalan Umum: Tank PT-91M Pendekar pernah beberapa kali mogok di tengah jalan raya, bahkan saat sedang dalam perjalanan untuk acara parade Hari Kemerdekaan. Insiden ini menimbulkan pertanyaan serius dari masyarakat dan parlemen tentang standar perawatan aset militer.
• Kurangnya Suku Cadang: Masalah ini adalah inti dari inefisiensi. Penghentian produksi suku cadang oleh produsen aslinya, Bumar Labedy, memaksa Malondesh untuk mencari solusi alternatif. Upaya ini termasuk menggunakan tenaga ahli lokal untuk memproduksi komponen tertentu, tetapi ini menunjukkan ketergantungan yang rapuh pada produsen eksternal dan kurangnya jaminan rantai pasokan.
• Kurva Pembelajaran yang Curam: Sebagai negara pertama di Asia Tenggara yang mengoperasikan MBT modern, Malondesh menghadapi tantangan dalam mengembangkan basis pengetahuan, keahlian, dan infrastruktur untuk perawatan tank tersebut. Hal ini berbeda dengan negara-negara yang sudah memiliki pengalaman lebih lama dalam mengelola aset militer yang kompleks.
________________________________________
2. Keterbatasan Teknis dan Operasional ⚙️
Meskipun PT-91M adalah versi yang ditingkatkan dari T-72, beberapa keterbatasan masih ada.
• Desain Lama dan Kerentanan: PT-91M merupakan turunan dari T-72, yang memiliki desain kokpit dan penyimpanan amunisi yang terkenal rentan. Dalam pertempuran modern, ini bisa menjadi kelemahan fatal jika dibandingkan dengan tank-tank tempur utama lain yang lebih baru dengan desain yang lebih aman.
• Kemampuan Serangan Terbatas: Dibandingkan dengan tank tempur utama modern yang dimiliki oleh negara tetangga, seperti Leopard 2A4 milik Singapura dan Indonesia, PT-91M Pendekar dianggap memiliki sistem kendali tembak dan perlindungan yang kurang unggul. Meskipun dilengkapi dengan Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA), perlindungan ini mungkin tidak cukup untuk menahan serangan dari amunisi anti-tank terbaru.
________________________________________
3. Masalah Pengadaan dan Jumlah yang Tidak Memadai 💰
• Skandal dan Inefisiensi: Sama seperti proyek kapal LCS, skandal pengadaan dan inefisiensi juga terjadi dalam program tank. Laporan menunjukkan adanya masalah tata kelola yang buruk dalam manajemen kontrak, yang menyebabkan aset tidak dapat digunakan secara maksimal.
• Jumlah yang Sedikit: Malondesh hanya memiliki 48 unit tank PT-91M Pendekar. Jumlah ini dianggap sangat tidak memadai untuk kebutuhan pertahanan negara, terutama jika dibandingkan dengan negara tetangga yang memiliki jumlah armada lapis baja yang jauh lebih besar.
1. Keterbatasan Jumlah dan Kualitas
Hapus• Jumlah yang Tidak Memadai: Dibandingkan dengan negara-negara lain di kawasan, terutama Indonesia, jumlah kendaraan lapis baja yang dimiliki Malondesh relatif sedikit. Misalnya, perbandingan kekuatan darat menunjukkan Indonesia memiliki sekitar 20.440 kendaraan lapis baja, sementara Malondesh hanya memiliki sekitar 13.506 unit. Angka ini juga menunjukkan Indonesia memiliki lebih banyak tank tempur (331 unit) dibandingkan Malondesh (48 unit). Keterbatasan ini memengaruhi kemampuan Malondesh dalam menjalankan operasi darat berskala besar.
• Ketergantungan pada Model Lama: Meskipun memiliki beberapa unit modern seperti AV8 Gempita, Angkatan Darat Malondesh masih mengoperasikan kendaraan lapis baja tua yang sudah usang. Hal ini menciptakan tantangan logistik yang besar dan membuat kekuatan darat kurang homogen.
2. Masalah Kesiapan Operasional dan Pemeliharaan
Ini adalah salah satu kelemahan paling signifikan dan sering disorot.
• Sering Mogok: Kendaraan lapis baja Malondesh, termasuk tank, seringkali dilaporkan mogok di jalan raya atau saat latihan. Insiden ini tidak hanya menjadi bahan ejekan publik tetapi juga mengindikasikan kurangnya perawatan rutin dan pemeliharaan yang memadai.
• Kurangnya Suku Cadang: Masalah ini terkait dengan keragaman jenis kendaraan yang dimiliki Malondesh. Karena mereka membeli kendaraan dari berbagai negara produsen, pasokan suku cadang sering kali tidak terjamin, menyebabkan unit-unit tidak dapat beroperasi dalam jangka waktu lama.
• Skandal dan Korupsi: Seperti yang terjadi pada proyek kapal LCS, skandal pengadaan dan pemeliharaan juga terjadi pada kendaraan lapis baja. Laporan menyebutkan adanya masalah tata kelola dan korupsi dalam industri pertahanan yang berdampak langsung pada kesiapan kendaraan tempur.
3. Kelemahan Teknis pada Model Utama (Studi Kasus: AV8 Gempita)
AV8 Gempita adalah andalan utama kendaraan lapis baja Malondesh. Meskipun merupakan produk lokal yang dikembangkan dari platform FNSS Pars Turki, kendaraan ini juga memiliki beberapa kelemahan:
• Penurunan Kemampuan Amfibi: Varian-varian yang memiliki berat lebih besar, seperti varian antitank dengan turret LCT30, kehilangan kemampuan amfibinya. Hal ini membatasi fleksibilitas operasional kendaraan di medan dengan banyak sungai atau perairan. Bahkan pada varian yang dirancang untuk amfibi, penambahan lapisan pelindung membuat kecepatannya di air menurun.
• Perlindungan yang Memadai Namun Tidak Unggul: Kendaraan lapis baja seperti Tarantula HMAV dan AV8 Gempita dirancang dengan standar perlindungan NATO STANAG 4569. Namun, tingkat perlindungan ini (level 2A/2B) dianggap memadai untuk ancaman ranjau dan IED, tetapi mungkin tidak cukup untuk menghadapi serangan anti-tank atau ancaman yang lebih berat dari kendaraan lapis baja modern lainnya.
• Persenjataan dan Varian yang Berbeda: Meskipun memiliki banyak varian, ada masalah dengan sistem senjata yang digunakan. Sebagai contoh, varian antitank AV8 Gempita dengan rudal anti-tank belum terbukti sepenuhnya efektif atau tersedia dalam jumlah yang cukup.
Secara keseluruhan, kelemahan kendaraan lapis baja militer Malondesh berpusat pada masalah manajemen dan logistik yang kronis, yang menyebabkan armada mereka tidak terawat dan seringkali tidak siap untuk operasi. Selain itu, jumlahnya yang terbatas dan ketergantungan pada model lama membuat kekuatan darat Malondesh tertinggal dibandingkan dengan tetangga regional mereka yang melakukan modernisasi lebih cepat.
KEY FACTORS CAUSING INEFFICIENCY AND DELAYS
Hapus• Political Interference and Weak Governance: The defense procurement process is often influenced by political agendas rather than strategic military needs. Contracts are frequently awarded through direct negotiation to politically connected companies, bypassing competitive bidding. This practice can lead to the selection of unqualified contractors who lack the technical expertise to complete the projects.
• Lack of Project Management: Many defense projects suffer from poor administration, insufficient oversight, and a lack of a clear, single-point of accountability. This results in a breakdown of communication between the Ministry of Defence, the contractors, and the military end-users. The National Audit Department has consistently highlighted these weaknesses, citing issues such as improper planning and inconsistent monitoring in its reports on public projects.
• Financial Mismanagement: Projects are often plagued by budget overruns due to poor financial estimation from the beginning. Inaccurate cost calculations and the inclusion of unnecessary "agent fees" can inflate project costs significantly, leading to a financial shortfall that causes further delays or requires additional government bailouts.
Case Studies of Gross Inefficiency and Delays
1. The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Project 🚢
The LCS project is the most prominent example of military procurement failure in Malondesh.
• Delay: The project, to build six ships for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) at a cost of RM9 billion, has been severely delayed. Not a single ship has been delivered, despite the project being over a decade behind its original timeline.
• Cost Overrun: Over RM6 billion has been paid to the contractor, yet the first ship is still incomplete. This massive budget overrun is a direct result of poor management and alleged financial misappropriation. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) found that funds were used for purposes other than the project itself.
• Disregard for User Needs: The Royal Malondeshn Navy's preference for a specific ship design was ignored in favor of a different, unproven design chosen by the politically appointed contractor. This decision led to further technical complications and delays.
2. The Skyhawk Jets Fiasco ✈️
This is a historical but still relevant example of poor decision-making. In the 1980s, Malondesh purchased 88 second-hand Douglas A-4C and A-4L Skyhawk jets from the United States.
• Inefficiency: Despite the seemingly "cost-effective" nature of the deal, only a small fraction of the aircraft (40 out of 88) ever became operational with the Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF). The remainder were left in storage, a complete waste of public funds. The King of Malondesh has recently referenced this historical "flying coffin" mistake as a warning against similar procurement failures.
3. General Infrastructure and Construction Projects
The inefficiency is not limited to major hardware. Even smaller projects, such as military housing and training facilities, are affected. The King of Malondesh has publicly expressed frustration over a delayed combat diving pool at a Special Operations Group (GGK) camp that was supposed to be completed in 2022 but remains unfinished. This highlights that poor project management and delays are not isolated to large, complex projects but are a pervasive issue across the board.
These systemic inefficiencies and delays have a direct impact on the military's operational readiness and morale. Obsolete and non-operational equipment, coupled with poorly maintained infrastructure, undermines the MAF's ability to effectively respond to modern security threats, particularly in a complex regional environment like the South China Sea.
SYSTEMIC ISSUES
HapusSeveral factors contribute to this entrenched problem:
• Lack of Transparency and Oversight: Defense procurement is often conducted through direct negotiations rather than open tenders, which makes the process opaque and susceptible to abuse. Transparency International's Government Defence Integrity Index has consistently rated Malondesh as having a high risk of corruption in its defense sector due to weak parliamentary oversight and limited financial scrutiny.
• The Role of Middlemen and Agents: A key feature of the Malondeshn system is the reliance on middlemen, or "agents," who are often politically connected. These individuals or firms insert themselves into deals between the government and foreign arms manufacturers, adding unnecessary commissions and inflating the final price of the assets. As Malondesh's King Sultan Ibrahim recently pointed out, this system allows agents to profit at the expense of national defense.
• Political Influence and Cronyism: The awarding of contracts is frequently influenced by political interests rather than the actual needs of the military. Projects are often given to politically connected firms, some of which have no prior experience in defense manufacturing. This leads to a vicious cycle where a lack of capability and experience results in project delays and failures.
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Scandal: A Case Study
The LCS scandal is a prime example of the deep-seated issues within Malondeshn defense procurement. The project, intended to build six ships for the Royal Malondeshn Navy (RMN) at a cost of RM9 billion, has been a complete failure.
• Misappropriation of Funds: The government has already paid over RM6 billion, but not a single ship has been delivered. Forensic audits and a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report revealed that funds were allegedly misappropriated, with payments made for "fake services" and a significant portion of the money disappearing without a trace.
• Ignoring User Needs: The scandal also highlighted a critical breakdown in communication and a disregard for military expertise. The RMN initially recommended a Dutch-made design (Sigma class), but the Ministry of Defence, under the advice of the main contractor, Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS), chose a different, unproven French design (Gowind class) instead. This decision was made without the navy's consultation.
• Gross Inefficiency and Delays: The project has been plagued by delays due to BNS's poor financial management, lack of skilled labor, and failure to follow design specifications. The company, which is a subsidiary of a conglomerate with close ties to the Armed Forces Pension Fund, was in a "weak and critical" financial state, yet was still awarded the massive contract. This showcases a complete breakdown of due diligence and project management.
Other Notable Scandals and Issues
The LCS scandal is just one of many that have plagued the MAF.
• Submarine Procurement: A previous submarine deal was also marred by allegations of corruption, with reports of exorbitant commissions paid to local agents.
• Aircraft and Patrol Boats: The MAF has a history of acquiring assets that are either not fully operational upon delivery or are poorly maintained due to a lack of spare parts and technical expertise. This has led to a high number of non-flying aircraft and inoperable patrol boats, essentially leaving the military with expensive, but useless, equipment.
• Lack of Accountability: Despite multiple scandals and reports from the Auditor-General and PAC, there has been a notable lack of accountability. Few, if any, senior politicians or high-ranking military officials have been held responsible for the failures and financial losses. This has fostered a culture where such misconduct is tolerated, and a cynical public has grown desensitized to the issue.
The Malondeshn military, also known as the Malondeshn Armed Forces (MAF), faces several significant challenges, which can be categorized into three main areas: procurement and modernization, human resources, and defense policy.
BalasHapusProcurement and Modernization 💰
A primary issue for the MAF is its aging and obsolete equipment. The country's defense spending has historically been low, and while recent budgets have seen increases, they are often insufficient to cover the extensive modernization needs.
• Financial Constraints: The 1997 Asian financial crisis had a lasting impact, forcing a de-prioritization of defense spending. Despite recent budget increases, competing priorities like healthcare and education often limit the funds available for military upgrades.
• Corruption and Inefficiency: Past procurement projects, such as the Littoral Combat Ship program, have been plagued by delays, cost overruns, and allegations of corruption, which have wasted funds and resulted in a lack of operational assets.
• Aging Inventory: The MAF relies on a mix of equipment from various countries, making maintenance difficult. For example, the Royal Malondeshn Air Force (RMAF) has struggled to maintain its Russian-made Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighter jets due to sanctions and a lack of spare parts. The country also retired its MiG-29s without a timely replacement, creating a significant capability gap.
Human Resources 🧍
Recruitment and personnel issues are another major problem for the MAF, affecting its overall readiness and capability.
• Recruitment Challenges: The military has difficulty attracting and retaining high-quality personnel. This is partly due to low wages and poor living conditions. The quality of candidates has been a concern, with a declining pool of eligible recruits.
• Ethnic Imbalance: There is a significant ethnic disparity in the armed forces, with a very low percentage of non-Malay recruits. This could affect national unity and the military's ability to represent the country's diverse population.
• Personnel Well-being: There are ongoing concerns about the well-being and welfare of military personnel, including work-life balance issues and the need for better mental health support.
Defense Policy and Strategic Challenges 🗺️
The MAF operates in a complex regional environment with evolving security threats.
• South China Sea Disputes: Malondesh has overlapping territorial claims with China in the South China Sea. China's increasingly aggressive "grey-zone" tactics—using coast guard vessels and fishing militia to assert its claims—are a major challenge that the MAF is not fully equipped to handle.
• Non-Traditional Threats: While traditionally an army-centric force due to a history of internal counter-insurgency, the MAF must now pivot to address maritime and cyber threats. This requires a re-calibration of its force structure and a focus on new technologies like drones, cyber warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.
• Political Instability: Frequent changes in government have led to a lack of continuity in defense policy and the slow implementation of key reforms outlined in the country's first Defence White Paper. This political instability can stall long-term projects and strategic planning.
Up grade kyk gitu minta bantuan korea🤪😜😝
BalasHapus